Scribd
Upload
44 views2 pages

8 Rgnul N M C C, 2019: Ational OOT Ourt Ompetition

Nidhi and Subodh got married in 2018 after convincing their parents, but Nidhi began feeling dominated by Subodh, who demanded intercourse without consent. When Nidhi sought advice, her mother and mother-in-law said it was a wife's duty to fulfill her husband's wishes. Inspired by a TV debate on marital rape, Nidhi approached an NGO to fight for her rights. The NGO filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court challenging the exception for marital rape in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code.

Uploaded by

Mudit Gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
44 views2 pages

8 Rgnul N M C C, 2019: Ational OOT Ourt Ompetition

Nidhi and Subodh got married in 2018 after convincing their parents, but Nidhi began feeling dominated by Subodh, who demanded intercourse without consent. When Nidhi sought advice, her mother and mother-in-law said it was a wife's duty to fulfill her husband's wishes. Inspired by a TV debate on marital rape, Nidhi approached an NGO to fight for her rights. The NGO filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court challenging the exception for marital rape in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code.

Uploaded by

Mudit Gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

8TH RGNUL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2019

Nidhi and Subodh, aged 22 and 24 respectively, are two working professionals in the
city of Patiala. They have been live-in partners since 2017 and love each other. Their
parents were against them marrying each other. However, both of them managed to
convince their parents that this was the perfect match for them. In December 2018,
Nidhi and Subodh tied the knot as per the Hindu rituals and customs.

After their marriage, the relationship took a toll and it wasn’t the same as it had been
prior to the marriage. The primary reason according to Nidhi was that Subodh had
begun to be a more dominating figure. He would now demand intercourse as if it were
a matter of right rather than it being an act of two consenting adults. He would never
pay heed to the feelings of Nidhi and this was something that hurt her. When Nidhi
tried to talk about this to her mother and mother-in-law, both of them had the same
view that it is the duty of an Indian wife to fulfill the wishes of her husband and be a
constant companion to him at any cost.

One day, Nidhi was watching a debate show on television on the topic of marital rape.
A few of the panelists strongly condemned Exception II to Section 375 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860. They argued that it was based on the archaic concepts where the wife
was considered as possession and property of the husband. It was further argued that
marital rape also violated human rights and various rights of women under Article 21
of the constitution. They also demanded that there should not be any distinction
between rape within and outside the marriage. On the other hand, the other panelists
argued that Exception II to Section 375 had been inserted to preserve the institution of
marriage and criminalization of sexual intercourse between spouses had potential to
wreak havoc on the society. Further, they argued that the Indian law delivers proper
protection to women rights and the Legislature is well aware of the situation and
demands of the Indian society.

Society for Women’s Rights is an NGO that works for the development and welfare of
women. It is an organization that has previously helped to bring in women-centric laws
by rallying for classification and enactment of women rights via legislations and judicial
intervention. Deeply moved by the debate, Nidhi finally decided to fight for her rights
and what she thought was a blatant injustice against her persona. She approached
Society for Women’s Rights and narrated her grief to their activists. The members of
the NGO decided to approach the court for seeking to eradicate the social plague of
marital rape.

A Public Interest Litigation was filed by the NGO before the Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India with respect to the violation of fundamental rights of married women of all
ages in the form of marital rape. The PIL also challenges the constitutional validity of
Exception II to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

NOTE: The participants are required to identify all the relevant issues and argue
the case. All the laws in force on the date of notification of this proposition shall
be applicable to the case.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy