Trends in India's Exports: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post Reform Period
Trends in India's Exports: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post Reform Period
e-ISSN: 2321-5933, p-ISSN: 2321-5925.Volume 3, Issue 2. Ver. I (Mar. - Apr. 2014), PP 08-18
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: This paper analyzes the trends in India’ s exports using the time series data for the
period 1980-81 to 2010-11. The Govt. of India introduced economic reforms since 1991 especially
in the trade sector, therefore, in order to see the impact of economic reforms on India’s export
behavior, the whole time period has been divided into two sub-periods 1980-81 to 1991-92 (pre-
reform period) and 1992-93 to 2010-11 (post-reform period). The study shows that India’s exports
performance improved significantly during the post -reform period and there has been a perceptible
change in the value, composition and direction of India’s exports. Though the volume and value of
exports has increased manifold, India’s share in the world exports is still not up -to the expectation.
Keyword: Economic Reforms, Economic Growth, India’s Exp orts, Liberalization, Openness.
I. Introduction
Exports have acquired added significance in the wake of liberalization wave sweeping
across the world. The trend towards market economy in almost all the countries of world has
increased the role of exports in developmental efforts. Therefore, exports constitute a key factor in
economic development of a country. For a developing country, it is essential to build up a sizeable
export surplus. The rate of economic growth is largely determined by the rate at which a country
can expand its export capacity. Higher rates of economic growth tend to be associated with higher
rates of export growth. A country that tries to promote growth while ignoring its export
performance may succeed in the short -run, but it will be hard- pressed to sustain growth over a long
period of time. Thus, it can be concluded that exports are a key factor in the growth process, not
one of political astrology but of empirical fact.
The major concern of the government in the past was restriction o f imports with a view to
controlling the trade deficit and protection of domestic industries against foreign competition.
Imports were, therefore were very much restricted by prohibition of imports of many few items,
import licensing, very high import duties and foreign exchange restrictions. The foreign trade
policy was characterized by the overtone of negativism. Beginning mid -1991, the Government of
India introduced a series of reforms to liberalize and globalize the Indian economy. Reforms in the
external sector of India were intended to integrate the Indian economy with rest of the world. In this
context, the Ninth five year plan (1997-2002) observed, “The process of globalization is a reality
which cannot be denied and also should not be avoided. Howe ver, it needs to be managed so that we
can derive the maximum advantage from the world markets”. Reforms of trade and exchange rate
policy were a critical element in the process of structural reforms. Since the initiation of economic
reforms, India‟s outward orientation has increased considerably.
The major trade policy changes in the post -1991 period included simplification of
procedures, removal of quantitative restrictions and substantial reduction in tariff rates. A
significant development in the current account of balance of payments in the 1990s was the
remarkable growth in the exports of invisibles to the rest of world. This was made possible by
unfrequented growth in information and communication related services like computer software,
hardware, internet, e - commerce and telecommunication sector. The economic reforms process
introduced since 1991 with focus on liberalization, openness, transparency and globalization has
enabled increased integration of the Indian economy with the rest of world. The growth rate of
India‟s trade is increasingly dependent on exogenous factors such as world trade growth (especially
those of the trading partners), international price changes and development in the competitor
countries. Cross currency exchange rates as well as dollar rupee exchange rate movements also get
reflected in the performance of India‟s trade.
India‟s approach to openness has been cautious, contingent on achieving certain pre -
conditions to ensure an orderly process of liberalization and ensuring macro -economic stability.
This approach has been vindicated in recent years with growing incidence of fina ncial crisis in the
world economy. Over and above, the entire policy regime in India with regard to liberalization of
www.iosrjournals.org 8 | Page
Trends in India’s Exports: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post Reform Period
external sector has witnessed perceptible change in the post -reform period.
globalization with enormous opportunities for higher growth emanating from higher exports
(Krueger, 1998). Exports, being a major part of India's foreign trade, have assumed a place of
paramount importance and play a significant role in economic development process through
generating investible surplus and financing imports by earning foreign exchange (Kaur, 1993).
Declining from respectable share of 2.00 per cent to 0.50 per cent during 1950 -60, and hovering
around 0.50 per cent during 1960-90, India‟s share in world merchandise export has increased from
0.56 per cent in 1991-92 to 1.0 per cent in 2005-06 and 1.6 percent in 2010-11. Trade policy
reforms in recent past with their focus on liberalization, openness, transparency and globalization as
well as creation of WTO have provided an export friendly environment with simplified procedure
for trade facilitation (Economic Survey, 2007 -08).
www.iosrjournals.org 10 | Page
Trends in India’s Exports: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post Reform Period
FIG:-1
INDIA’S PERCENTAGE SHARE IN WORLD EXPORTS VIS-À-VIS OTHER COUNTRIES
(1980-2011)
www.iosrjournals.org 11 | Page
Trends in India’s Exports: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post Reform Period
TABLE: - 1.2
GROWTH RATE OF INDIA’S EXPORTS OF AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED PROD UCTS
PRE AND POST ECONOMIC REFORMS PERIOD
COMPOUND GROWTH RATE COMPOUND GROWTH RATE
COMMODITY FOR PRE-REFORM PERIOD FOR POST-REFORM PERIOD
(1980-81 TO 1991-92) (1992-93 TO 2010-11)
I.)Agriculture & Allied products 1.9 9.7
1. Tea 0.8 3.0
2. Coffee -2.5 3.1
3. Rice -0.4 10.0
4. Tobacco -4.4 10.6
5. Marine Products 5.7 5.4
II.) Ores & Minerals 2.2 17.5
Source:- Handbook of statistics on Indian Economy (various issues) & Author’s calculation
The above table (1.2) reveals that The compound growth rate of India‟s exports of
agriculture and allied products is found to be only 1.9 percent during the pre -reform period but it is
found to be higher i.e. 9.7 percent during the post -reform period. It implies that the exports of
agriculture and allied products has been rising during post reform period due to the factors such
as:-Adoption of a National Agricultural policy (NAP) by the Government of India, Establishment of
Agriculture Export Zones (AEZs), VisheshKrishi and Gram UdyogYojna (VKGUY) and Opening of
Agriculture under W.T.O.
1. TEA:
Tea has been the most important traditional commodity in our exports. The Indian tea
industry is a profile source of foreign exchange for the central and state Governments. India has the
largest average as well as the highest production of tea in the world. It even occupied first position
in our export items in the few years of sixties. The compound growth rate of India‟s exports of tea
is found to be only 0.8 percent during pre -reform period which indicates very poor performance of
tea exports due to the factors such as: - Increase in domestic demand for tea faster than expansion in
its production, Rise in price of tea in domestic market vis -à-vis international prices, Competition
from East Africa, China, Lanka and Bangladesh, Low yield rate, Increase in cost of production,
Heavy fiscal burden and Progressive tax policy of Government. But the C.G.R is found to be 3.0
percent during post-reform period which is greater as compared to pre -reform period. It implies a
rise in exports of tea during post reform period because of factors such as: Improvement in the
production of North Indian tea, Firming up of tea price in the world market, Rise in unit value
realization and Failure of Kenya‟s tea crop.
2. COFFEE:-
Coffee is another important traditional commodity in India‟s export basket. The C.G.R of
India‟s exports of coffee is found to be negative during the pre -reform period. It implies very poor
performance of coffee exports due to fall in exports of coffee to USA and EEC. But the exports of
coffee have shown some improvement during post -reform period as C.G.R is found to be positive.
This rise in exports of coffee may be attributed to the factors such as: Failure of Brazilian coffee
crop, Increase in India‟s competitiveness in coffee.
3. RICE:-
The C.G.R of India‟s exports of rice is found to be negative during pre -reform period. The
fall in export volume, in face of the buoyant market conditions is due to decline in domestic
availability following the drought conditions and because of ban placed on exports of non -basmati
rice to augment domestic supply. But during the post -reform period exports of rice has shown a
remarkable growth as C.G.R is found to be 10.08 percent. The adjustments in the exchange rate of
rupee, attractive premium on exim-scrip and inclusion of exports of certain varieties of rice in the
open general license made the exports of rice competitive. Bulk of these exports found their ways to
www.iosrjournals.org 12 | Page
Trends in India’s Exports: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post Reform Period
the gulf region and the USA. Further, recover y in agriculture also facilitated an increase in rice
exports during post-reform period.
4. TOBACCO:-
Tobacco has been yet another highly playing traditional exportable item and its relative
share in the country‟s exports, like that of other traditional e xportable has been marginal and has
moved in a narrow direction in eighties. India‟s exports of tobacco experienced a negative growth
rate during pre-reform period mainly due to the reasons such as: - Anti-smoking drive, Increased
competition from other tobacco producing countries, Higher price as compared to Brazil and South
Korea, Decline in exports to China and USSR, Drought conditions prevailing in the country,
Stagnant yield and Use of traditional methods of cultivation, Pressure for internal consumptio n,
Failure to produce quality tobacco and Increase in the cost of production. But the exports of tobacco
have shown a rapid growth during post -reform period as the C.G.R is found to be 10.6 percent. This
is mainly due to higher unit value realization. Furt hermore, the rapid growth of exports of tobacco
during post- reform period is a welcome development in view of the value -added being generated
within the country.
5. MARINE PRODUCTS:-
The C.G.R of exports of marine products is found to be 5.76 percent dur ing pre-reform
period and 5.44 percent during post-reform period. Improved catch position because of the
operation of chartered vessels, coupled with better infrastructural facilities like cold storage,
transport, etc. and quality control gave apparently a boost to these exports.
TABLE: 1.3
GROWTH RATE OF INDIA’S EXPORTS OF MANUFACTURED GOODS PRE AND POST
ECONOMIC REFORMS PERIOD
COMMODITY COMPOUND GROWTH RATE COMPOUND GROWTH RATE
FOR PRE-REFORM PERIOD FOR POST-REFORM PERIOD
(1980-81 TO 1991-92) (1992-93 TO 2010-11)
III. Manufactured Goods 12.3 13.6
1.Leather & Manufactures 14.2 6.0
2.Engineering Goods 9.4 19.6
3.Gems &Jewellery 15.4 13.8
4.Chemical& Related products 20.5 16.0
5.Petroleum Products 24.6 37.7
Source:- Handbook of statistics on Indian Economy (various issues) & Author’s calculation
The above table (1.3) shows that Compound Growth Rate of India‟s exports of
Manufactured goods is found to be 12.3 percent during pre -reform period but it improved slightly
i.e. 13.6 percent in post-reform period which implies that the exports of manufactured goods have
shown an improved performance in post-reform period. However, the consistent rise in the share of
this commodity group can be attributed to many commodities, whose exports have shown a
remarkable increase. Category wise export performance of manufactured goods is as follows:-
recession, Sharp drop in exports of finished leather and footwear components mainly due to the
break- up of former USSR, Depressed market conditions for leather in European union countries
and delay in clearance of imported consignment etc. In view of competition from developed
countries, the Government has set up an inter -ministerial committee to provide a single window
clearance to enable leather exports to meet their requirements of imported raw materials, machinery
etc. on a priority basis. The export base of this item has been strengthened by the change in the
composition of exports wherein there has been an increase in the share of finished pr oducts and
items with higher value additions. The leather exports promotion council has also taken steps to
improve the skills of technical personnel and to promote the development, fabrication and
distribution of improved tools for tanning etc.
2. ENGINEERING GOODS:-
The C.G.R of exports of engineering goods is found to be 9.4 percent during pre -reform
period but almost doubled during post-reform period as period as C.G.R is found to be 19.6 percent
due to the factors such as: Rising demand from countries i n East Asia and China, Growing
industrial base of the country, Fixation of minimum value addition levels and Stream ling of
procedures for ensuring optimal use of funds under IPRS i.e. International Price Reimbursement
Scheme. Finally, the sharp rise in the engineering goods exports indicates that despite rising
protectionism in the developed countries and strong competition in international market from the
newly industrialized countries these items have achieved acceptable quality and quantity standards.
5. PETROLEUM PRODUCTS:-
The compound growth rate of India‟s exports of petroleum products is found to be 24.6
percent during pre-reform period 37.7 percent during post-reform period. This implies that India‟s
exports of petroleum products have shown a remarkable performance in both the peri ods especially
in post-reform period. Enhanced domestic refining capacity developed with a supportive tariff
structure is mainly responsible for surge in exports of petroleum products in post -reform period.
EASTERN DEVELOPING
OECD OPEC
EUROPE
www.iosrjournals.org 14 | Page
COUNTRIES
Trends in India’s Exports: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post Reform Period
B. EXPORTS TO OPEC:-
India had relatively old trade connections with Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries. In the 1950s, it was India‟s turn to be placed in a more advantageous position where it
had more to offer to these countries than to buy them. The C.G.R of India‟s exports to OPEC is
found to be only 0.6 percent during pre -reform period but it is found to be much greater (20.5
percent) during post-reform period. This implies that our trade with OPEC during post -reform era
has improved substantially as its share in Indian exp orts has increased. Prevalence of high
international crude oil prices and the consequent gains in terms of trade have increased the share of
India‟s exports with OPEC region.
economic relations. In addition, the sharp increase in exports to Eastern Europe was associated with
the repayment of technical credits as trade agreements which govern trade with countries drew to a
close.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The major policy implications emerging out of the present study are as follows: -
1. For India to become a leading exporter in the world trade it will have to achieve at -least 2
percent share of world exports by the year 2020. Based on the past trends in world trade and
new developments in global economic scenario envisaged over the next few years,
aggregate world exports are likely to cross 25,000 billion dollars by 2020. India‟s exports
should, therefore, exceed 500 billion dollars to acc omplish this vision. However, there
seems to be a controversy between economists and policy - makers. For one group of
economists this target might appear to be too ambitious to achieve and one might dismiss it
as an exercise in wishful thinking. We feel th at this target can be achieved provided global
environment in external trade becomes favorable.
2. Deepening of reforms into specific export sectors would stimulate India‟s exports; result
compositional and geographical diversification; help to remove supply bottlenecks
operating in the economy and help in improving export competitiveness. More emphasis on
rapidly increasing markets in the context of the behavior of price and income elasticity‟s
would positively affect the demand for export, and further would eliminate the negative
market distribution and commodity composition effects.
3. The Government should make special efforts to increase the High Technology exports Such
as aerospace, computers-office machine, scientific instruments, electrical machinery,
pharmacy etc. as India‟s performance on high tech manufacturing trade front is not at par
with other leading exporters of high technology products.
4. India needs to reorient the pattern of its exports to switch to more skill -intensive and more
knowledge-intensive goods and services of competitive international quality. Further,
diversification of exports and the development of new export markets should be viewed as
part of a wider effort to enlarge the country‟s foreign trade and expand commercial and
economic relations with other countries.
Bibliography
[1]. Aggarwal, M.R. (1982), Export Earning Instability and Economic Development in Less Developed Countries: A
Statistical Verification, Indian Economic Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 60 -70.
[2]. Aksoy M.T and Tang H. (1992), “Imports, Exports and Industrial Performance in India: 1970 -88”, Policy Research
Working Paper No. 969, August, World Bank, 1 -41.
[3]. Anoruo Emanuel and Yusuf A. (2000), “Openness and Economic Growth: Evidence from Selected ASEAN
Countries”, Indian Economic Journal, Vol. 47 (3), pp.110 -117.
[4]. Arize A. (1990), “An Econometric Investigation of Export Behavior in seven Asian Developing Countries”,
Applied Economics, Vol. 22 (7) pp. 891 -904.
[5]. Bannock, G., R.E. Baxter, and E. Davis (1992), The Penguin Dictionary of Economics, Penguin Book Ltd.,
London, England.
[6]. Balaguer J. and Manuel Cantavella - Jorda (2002), “Structural Change in Exports and Economic Growth: Co-
integration and Causality analysis for Spain”, WP -EC 2000-2.
[7]. Chennery, (1979); Chennery, H.B (1979), Structural Change and Development Policy, Oxford University Press,
New York
[8]. Chen Huan (2009), “A Literature Review on the Relationship between Foreign Trade and Economic Growth”,
International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 1, No. 1.
[9]. Kavoussi R.M. (1984), “Export Expansion and Economic Growth: Further Empirical Evidence”, Journal of
Development Economics, Vol. 14: 241 -50.
[10]. Kaur, N. (1993). India‟s Exports: An Analysis of Instability and Performance, Ph.D. Thesis, Unpublished, Punjabi
University, Patiala
[11]. Krueger, A. (1998), Why Trade Liberalisation is Good for World?, The Economic Journal, Vol. 108, September.
[12]. KaushikKrishan K, Lawrence Nil Anang, (2008), “Export Growth, Export Instability, Investment and Economic
Growth in India: A time series Analysis”, Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 155 -170.
[13]. Moon B.E. (1998), “Exports, Outward Oriented Development and Economic Growth”, Political Research
quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 7 -37.
[14]. Ram R. (1987), “Exports and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Evidence from Time - series and Cross-
Sectional Data”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 36 (1).
[15]. Rashid A. Ismail (1995), “Trade, Growth and liberalization: The Indian Experience, 1977 -1989”, Journal of
Developing Areas, Vol. 29, pp. 365 -370.
[16]. Santos Paulino A. and Thirlwall A.P (2004), “The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Exports, Imports and the
Balance of Payments of Developing Countries”, The Economic Journal, 114 (February), pp. 50 -72.
www.iosrjournals.org 17 | Page
Trends in India’s Exports: A Comparative Study of Pre and Post Reform Period
China 2.9 2.8 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.9 4.3 5.1 5.9 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.8 8.9 9.7 9.9 10.5
Hong 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.7
Kong
Malaysia 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2
Indonesia 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1
Singapore 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.1 2.2 1.6 1.9
Thailand 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2
India 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.7
Korea 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.0
Developing 32.0 32.8 33.7 32.0 32.3 37.3 26.8 37.9 38.7 40.7 43.8 45.3 45.0 37.9 37.0 34.6 35.9
Countries
World 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source:- International Financial Statistics Yearbook (Various issues )
www.iosrjournals.org 18 | Page