COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES improve

performance.
Self-Management Examples
may include
Sets personal
doing
goals and
something
direction,
1 needs and 4 better, faster,
at alower cost,
development.
more
efficiently; or
Undertakes Teamwork
personal 4.00 1 Willingly does h
2 actions and 4 4
behaviors that
are clear and 2 Promotes
purposive collaboration
Displays and and removes
emotional barriers to
maturity and teamwork and
enthusiasm goal
for and is accomplishme 4 4.00
3 challenged by 4 nt across the
higher goals organization

Prioritize work 3 Applies

tasks and negotiation
schedules principles in
(through gantt arriving at win-
charts, win
checklists, agreements.
4 etc.) to 4 4
achieve goals.

Sets high 4 Drives consens

quality,
challenging,
realistic goals
5
for self and
4 4
others
 5 Works
constructively
and
collaboratively
with others
and across
organizations
Professionalism and Ethic to accomplish 4
organizational
goals and
objectives.

Demonstrates Service Orientation

the values
and behavior Can explain
enshrined in and articulate
the Norms of organizational
1 4 directions,
Conduct and 1 4
Ethical issues and
Standards for problems.
public officials
and employee

Practices
ethical and
professional
behavior and Takes
personal
2 conduct taking 4 4.00 2
responsibilty
4 4.00
into account
the impact of for dealing
his/her actions with and/or
and decisions. correcting
costumer
service issues
and concerns
 Maintains
professional
image: being
trustworthy,
regularity of
attendance
3
and 4 3 Initiates 4
punctuality, activities that
good promotes
grooming and advocacy for
communicatio men and
n. women
empowerment
.

Participates in
updating of
Makes office vision,
personal mission,
sacrifices to mandates &
4
meet the 4 4
strategies 4
organization's based on
needs. DepEd
strategies and
directions.

Acts with a
Develops and
sense pf
adopts service
urgency and
improvement
responsibility
programs
to meet the
through
organization's
5
needs, 4 5 simplified 4
procedures
improves
that will further
systems and
enhance
help others
service
improve their
delivery.
effectiveness.

Result Focus Innovation

 Achieves Examines the
results with root cause of
optimal use of problems and
time and suggests
resources effective
most of the solutions.
time. Fosters new
ideas,
processes,
1 4 1 and suggests 4
bettter ways
to do things
(cost and/or
operational
efficiency).

Avoids Demonstrates
rework, an ability to
mistakes and think "beyond
wastage the box".
through Continuously
effective work focuses on
2
methods by 4 2
improving 4
placing personal
organizational productivity to
needs before create higher
personal value and
needs. results.
 Delivers error-
free outputs
most of the
time by
conforming to
standard
operating
Promotes a
procedures
creative
correctly and
climate and
consistently.
inspires co-
3 Able to 4 4.20 3
workers to 4 4.00
produce very
develop
satisfactoy
original ideas
quality of work
or solutions.
in terms of
usefulness/ac
ceptability and
completeness
with no
supervision
required.

Expresses a
desire to do
Translates
better and
creative
may express
thinking into
frustration at
tangible
waste or
4
inefficiency. 5 4 changes and 4
solutions that
May focus on
improve the
new or more
work unit and
precise ways
organization.
of meeting
goals set.
 Uses
ingenious
methods to
accomplish
Makes
responsibilties
specific
.
changes in
5
the system or 4 5 Demonstrates 4
resourcefulne
in own work
ss and the
methods to
ability to
succeed with
minimal
resources.

5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -SG 18 above

LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES People Development

Improves the
skills and
effectiveness of
individuals
through
employing a
Leading People 1 range of 4
developmental
strategies
 Uses basic Facilitates
persuation workforce
techniques in effectiveness
a discussion through
or coaching and
presentation motivating/dev
e.g., staff eloping
mobilization , people within
appeals to a work
1 reason and/or 4 4.00 2 environment 4 4.20
emotions, that promotes
uses data and mutual trust
examples,visu and respect.
al aids

Persuades,co Conceptualize
nvinces or s and
influences implements
others, in learning
order to have interventions
2 a specific 4 3 to meet 5
impact or identified
effect. training needs
 "Sets a good Does long
example", is a term coaching
good and or training by
respected arranging
leader;and appropriate
demonstrates and helpful
desired assignments,
behavior formal
training,or
other
experiences
3 4 4 for the 4
purpose of
supporting a
person's
learning and
development.

Recommends
appropriate
and updated
4 4 5 technology to 4
enhance
productivity
and
professional
Adjust communic practice.
 Forwards personal,professional and work unit needs and interests in an issu

Cultivates a
learning
environment
by structuring
interactive
4 5 experiences 4
such as
looking for
future
opportunities
that are in
support of
achieving
individual
career goals.
Assumes a
pivotal role in
promoting the
development of
an
inspiring,releva
nt vision for the
organization
and influences
others to share
ownership of
depEd goals, in
order to create
5 an effetive 4
work
environment.

People Performance Man

 Makes
specific
changes in
the
performance
management
system or in
own work
methods t5o
improve
performance
(e.g., does
something
better ,faster,
at lower
1
cost,more
4
efficiently;impr
oves
quality,custom
er
satisfaction,m
orale,revenue
s).

Sets
performance
standards and
measures
progress of
employees
based on
2 office and 4 4.00
department
targets.

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS

 Provides
feedback and
technical
assistance
such as
coaching for
3 performance 4
improvement
and action
planning

CORE BEHAVI 4.03

States
performance
expectations
clearly and
checks
4 understanding 4
and
commitment

CORE SKILLS 4.07

Performs all
the stages of
result-based
performance
management
system
supported by
5 evidence and 4
required
documents/for
ms

OVERALL RA 4.05

5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates

Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) - Teacher I-III (Proficient Teachers)
Name of Employee MARIA JESSICA V. MARABI Name of Rater ELVIRA I. JABONILLO
Position SST-1 Position School Principal
Division BOHOL Date of Review 29-Apr-19
Rating Period SY 2018-2019 School Pagnitoan NHS

KRAs To be Filled in during

MFOs Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives Timeline per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) Score
Q E T Ave
Very Unsatisfactory
A. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy 22.5% QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) (2) Poor (1)
Basic 1. Applied 7.5% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable Showed knowledge
Education Knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was of content and its
Services content within content and its content and its content and its content and its shown integration within
and across integration integration integration integration and across subject
curriculum within and within and within and within and areas as shown in
teaching areas across subject across subject across subject across subject MOV1 with a rating
areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown of 6
in MOV1 with a in MOV1 with a in MOV1 with a in MOV1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

June 2018-
March 3 3.00 0.23
2019
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons of the other evidence was
using MOV 1 using MOV 1 using MOV 1 given MOV shown
and supported and supported and supported
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the
other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Content
Knowledge and
 KRAs To be Filled in during
MFOs Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives Timeline per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) Score
Q E T Ave
2. Uses of range 7.5% Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
of teaching different different different different evidence was
strategies that teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
enhance learner strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
achievement in promote promote promote promote
literacy and reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing
numeracy skills and/or and/or and/or and/or
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

June 2018-
Content March Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 3 3.00 0.23
Knowledge and 2019 least 4 learner- learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
Pedagogy centered lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as shown
as evidently evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
shown in MOV1 in MOV1 in MOV1 in any of the
andsupported andsupported andsupported given MOV
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the
other MOV other MOV other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
3. Applied a range 7.5% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
of teaching teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
strategies to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative
thinking, as well thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
as other higher- other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
order thinking shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
skills with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

June 2018-
March 3 3.00 0.23
2019
 as other higher-
order thinking
skills
KRAs To be Filled in during
MFOs Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives Timeline
June 2018- per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) March
Q
3E T 3.00 Ave
0.23
Score
2019
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was
as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by shown
MOV1 and MOV1 and MOV1 and any 1 of the
supported by supported by supported by given MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
B. Learning Environment and Diversity of 22.5% QET Very
Outstanding (5) Satisfactory Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory Poor (1)
Learners (4) (2)
Basic 4. Managed 7.5% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education classroom management management management management evidence was
Services structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
engage learners, engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
individually or in in in in in
groups in activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
meaningful as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
exploration, MOV1 with a MOV1 with a MOV1 with a MOV1 with a
delivery and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
hands-on
activities within a
range of physical June 2018-
learning March 4 4.00 0.30
environment. 2019 Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson evidence was
supported by supported by supported by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any any 1 of the
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other other acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV

Timeliness

Learning
 KRAs To be Filled in during
MFOs Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives Timeline per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) Score
Q E T Ave
5. Managed 7.5% Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
learner behavior management management management management evidence was
constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of shown
applying positive learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote that promote that promote that promote
discipline to positive and positive and positive and positive and
ensure learning- non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
focused discipline as discipline as discipline as discipline as
environment shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
June 2018-
March 4 4.00 0.30
2019
Learning
Environment and
Diversity of
Learners Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the evidence was
given strategies given strategies given strategies given strategies shown
as observed in at as observed in at as observed in at as observed in
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons only 1 lesson

Timeliness
6. Used 7.5% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
developmentally teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
learning address learner address learner address learner address learner
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
address learners' shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
gender, needs, with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
strenths,
interests, and
experiences.

June 2018-
March 4 4.00 0.30
2019
 experiences to
address learners'
gender, needs,
KRAs strenths, To be Filled in during
MFOs interests, and Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives
experiences. Timeline per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) Score
Q E T Ave
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
June 2018- least 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
March differentiated teaching teaching teaching shown 4 4.00 0.30
2019 teaching strategies in at strategies in at strategies in only
strategies in at least 2 lessons least 2 lessons 1 lesson as
least 2 lessons as evidenced by as evidenced by evidently shown
as evidenced by MOV1 and MOV1 and in any 1 of the
MOV1 and supported by supported by acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Very Unsatisfactory
C. Curriculum and Planning 22.5% QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) (2) Poor (1)
Basic 7. Planned, 7.5% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Education managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching process learning process learning process learning process learning process
to meet as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
curriculum MOV1 with a MOV1 with a MOV1 with a MOV1 with a
requirements and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
varied teaching
contexts.

June 2018-
March 4 4.00 0.30
2019
 teaching process
to meet
curriculum
KRAs requirements and To be Filled in during
MFOs varied teaching Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives
contexts. Timeline per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) Score
Q E T Ave
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
June 2018- developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
March sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and 4 4.00 0.30
2019 teaching and learning process learning process learning process
learning process as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in any 1
shown in MOV1 and supported and supported of the other
and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the given MOV
by any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
8. Participated in 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
collegial participated in participated in participated in participated in evidence was
discussions that LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ shown
use teacher and meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to
learner feedback discuss discuss discuss discuss
to enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
practice. feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
June 2018-
Curriculum and March 4 4 4.00 0.30
Planning 2019
Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable
least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence was
LACs/FGDs/Mee Meetings as Meetings as Meetings as shown
tings as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness
 KRAs To be Filled in during
MFOs Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives Timeline per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) Score
Q E T Ave
9. Selected, 7.5% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning learning learning learning
teaching and resources, resources, resources, resources,
learning including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
resources, address learning address learning address learning address learning
including ICT, to goals as shown goals as shown goals as shown goals as shown
address learning in MOV1 with a in MOV1 with a in MOV1 with a in MOV1 with a
goals. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable

June 2018- least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and evidence was
March teaching and and learning and learning learning shown 4 4 4.00 0.30
2019 learning resources resources resources
resources including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
including ICT, as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently by by MOV1 and by MOV1 and in any 1 of the
MOV1 and supported by supported by acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Very Unsatisfactory
D. Assessment and Reporting 22.5% QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) (2) Poor (1)
 KRAs To be Filled in during
MFOs Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives Timeline per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) Score
Q E T Ave
Basic 10. Designed, 7.5% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable
Education selected, selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was
Services organized and organized and organized and organized and organized and shown
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative, and formative, and formative, and formative, and formative, and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

June 2018-
March 4 4 4.00 0.30
2019

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool evidence was
assessment assessment assessment as evidently shown
tools as tools as tools as shown in any 1
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown of the
in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

11. Monitored 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable

and evaluated monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and evidence was
learner progress evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated shown
and achievement learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress
using learner and and and and
attainment date. achievement achievement achievement achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment date attainment date attainment date attainment date
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

June 2018-
March 4 4 4 0.30
Assessment and 2019
Reporting
 KRAs To be Filled in during
evaluation
Timeline Weight
MFOs
(Major
(Key Result Objectives Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) June 2018- per KRA Actual Results
Score
Areas) March 4 4E T Ave
Q 4 0.30
Assessment and 2019
Reporting Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of combination of combination of acceptable MOV evidence was
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed were distributed evidence was
across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1 quarter shown
quarters quarters quarters

12. 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable

Communicated showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and evidence was
promptly and and clear and clear and clear clear shown
clearly the communication communication communication communication
learners' needs, of the learners' of the learners' of the learners' of the learners'
progress and needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
achievement to and and and and
key stakeholders, achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
including key key key key
parents/ stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
guardians. including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

June 2018-
March 4 4 4.00 0.30
2019

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 No acceptable

combination of combination of combination of acceptable MOV evidence was
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed were distributed evidence was
across 4 across 3 across 2 across 1 quarter shown
quarters quarters quarters
 KRAs To be Filled in during
MFOs Weight evaluation
(Major
(Key Result Objectives Timeline per KRA Performance Indicators Actual Result
Final Outputs) Actual Results
Areas) Score
Q E T Ave
Very Unsatisfactory
E. Plus Factor 10.0% QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) (2) Poor (1)
Basic 13. Performed 10.0% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable
Education various related performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services work/ activities various related various related various related various related shown
that contribute to work/ activities work/ activities work/ activities work/ activities
the teaching- that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
learning process. to the teaching- to the teaching- to the teaching- to the teaching-
learning process learning process learning process learning process
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

June 2018-
Plus Factor March 5 5 5.00 0.50
2019

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the evidence was
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable MOV shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

OVERALL RATING
FOR 3.88
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

VS

AGUSTINA S. DELIGERO ELVIRA I. JABONILLO MARIA JESSICA V. MARABI

PSDS Rater Ratee