Scribd
Upload
38 views4 pages

Calibration of Weir of Hydrology Apparatus

The document summarizes an experiment conducted by 6 students to calibrate the weir of a hydrology apparatus. It includes tables of flow rate and head measurements from 4 groups across 10 trials each. A graph plots the flow rate versus head with a polynomial trendline, and sample calculations show how flow rates were converted from LPM to m3/s. The results, discussion, conclusions and recommendations sections were not included.

Uploaded by

Shean Berwin Gonzales
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
38 views4 pages

Calibration of Weir of Hydrology Apparatus

The document summarizes an experiment conducted by 6 students to calibrate the weir of a hydrology apparatus. It includes tables of flow rate and head measurements from 4 groups across 10 trials each. A graph plots the flow rate versus head with a polynomial trendline, and sample calculations show how flow rates were converted from LPM to m3/s. The results, discussion, conclusions and recommendations sections were not included.

Uploaded by

Shean Berwin Gonzales
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Experiment No.

1
Data Sheet

Calibration of Weir of Hydrology Apparatus

Date Performed: May 29, 2019


Date Submitted: June 20, 2019
Section : EH2
Members of the Group:

1. Dominic Cutango 4. Hanz Martinez


2. Anton Valdez 5. Kirk Bautista
3. Bladimir Rosario 6. Shean Gonzales
________________________________________________
RESULTS OF THE EXPERIMENT

Table 1. Group 1 Data


Trial No. Q (LPM) Q (m3/s) H(mm)
1 2.5 4.17E-05 17.5
2 3.5 5.83E-05 18
3 4.5 7.50E-05 22
4 5.5 9.17E-05 25
5 6.5 1.08E-04 28
6 7.5 1.25E-04 31
7 8.5 1.42E-04 33
8 9.5 1.58E-04 36
9 10.5 1.75E-04 40
10 11.5 1.92E-04 41

Table 2. Group 2 Data


Trial No. Q (LPM) Q (m3/s) H(mm)
1 2 3.33E-05 17
2 3 5.00E-05 21
3 4 6.67E-05 21
4 5 8.33E-05 25
5 6 1.00E-04 29
6 7 1.17E-04 31
7 8 1.33E-04 34
8 9 1.50E-04 37
9 10 1.67E-04 39.5
10 11 1.83E-04 41
Table 3. Group 3 Data
Trial No. Q (LPM) Q (m3/s) H(mm)
1 2 3.33E-05 10.4
2 3 5.00E-05 10.9
3 5 8.33E-05 20.1
4 7 1.17E-04 31
5 9 1.50E-04 34
6 11 1.83E-04 39
7 13 2.17E-04 45
8 15 2.50E-04 51
9 17 2.83E-04 55
10 19 3.17E-04 58

Table 4. Group 4 Data


Trial No. Q (LPM) Q (m3/s) H(mm)
1 2 3.33E-05 14
2 4 6.67E-05 21
3 6 1.00E-04 27
4 8 1.33E-04 33
5 10 1.67E-04 38
6 12 2.00E-04 43
7 14 2.33E-04 47
8 16 2.67E-04 52
9 18 3.00E-04 56
10 20 3.33E-04 60
GRAPH:

Flow Rate Versus Head


25
y = 0.0034x2 + 0.133x - 0.1051
FLOW RATE (LPM) 20 R² = 0.9915

15

10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
-5
HEAD (MM)

FLOW RATE VS HEAD Poly. (FLOW RATE VS HEAD)

Figure 1. Calibration Curve

SAMPLE COMPUTATIONS:
Conversion of flow rate from LPM to m3/s:

𝐿 1𝑚3 1𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑚3
2.5 𝑥 𝑥 = 0.417𝑥10−4
𝑚𝑖𝑛 1000𝐿 60 𝑠 𝑠

RESULTS / DISCUSSION: (attach additional page/s if necessary)

CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy