Writing A Scientific Paper
Writing A Scientific Paper
scientific papers
Claudio Casetti
Why are we here?
• The acceptance rate of non-mother English tongue
authors is generally a lot lower than for native English
tongue authors.
• http://cardiovascres.oxfordjournals.org/content/
53/2/279.long
General Advice
• Write for your readers
Conclusions
The abstract
• Motivation:
Why do we care about the problem and the
results? If the problem isn't obviously
"interesting" it might be better to put
motivation first; but if your work is
incremental progress on a problem that is
widely recognized as important, then it is
probably better to put the problem
statement first to indicate which piece of
The abstract
• Ideally, a scientific paper
abstract should provide 5 key
pieces of information
1. Motivation
• Motivation:
Why do we care about the problem and the
results? If the problem isn't obviously
"interesting" it might be better to put
motivation first; but if your work is
incremental progress on a problem that is
widely recognized as important, then it is
probably better to put the problem
statement first to indicate which piece of
The abstract
• Ideally, a scientific paper
abstract should provide 5 key
pieces of information
1. Motivation
2. Problem statement
The abstract
• Ideally, a scientific paper
abstract should provide 5 key
pieces of information
1. Motivation
2. Problem statement
3. Approach
The abstract
• Ideally, a scientific paper
abstract should provide 5 key
pieces of information
1. Motivation
2. Problem statement
3. Approach
4. Results
5. Conclusions
}
The abstract
• This is an abstract
you do not want to write
• no discernible structure
• no context
Introduction
Conclusions
The “Introduction”
• Capture the readers’ (and reviewers’) attention!
Introduction
Related Work
Conclusions
Related Work
• web sites
!
would you like your work
to be cited in this way?
Related Work
!
Related Work
!
!
Bibliography
• Some simple rules:
Introduction
Related Work
Technical Background
Your Proposal
Conclusions
Background and Proposal
• General advice:
Introduction
Related Work
Technical Background
Your Proposal
Conclusions
Results and discussion
Introduction
Related Work
Technical Background
Your Proposal
Conclusions
Conclusions
! a multiple-input board
! an eye-opening experiment
! user-friendly interface
• some fixed expressions (at arm’s length, the earth’s surface, the
journey’s end…)
The Genitive
• Genitive with non-living things is usually wrong
(unless you’re certain it is a fixed expression -
learn from experience or google it…)
singular!
The article
• General rule:
Go easy on nominalisation
• Removing nominalization makes sentences
crisper: watch for excessive use of prepositions
Go easy on nominalisation
• Removing nominalization makes sentences
crisper: watch for excessive use of prepositions
• In relative clauses:
• In incidental clauses:
• Enumerate concepts:
• First of all (firstly) … Secondly … Lastly
Arguably,… Therefore,…
As a consequence,… Furthermore,…
In this paper, we focus on the hard decoder, since its delivery rate
can be accurately estimated. Conversely, our experiments show
that the delivery rate of a soft decoder (with or without combining)
! depends not only on effective SNR but also on the mapping
between symbols and SNR. Additionally, the delivery rate of a soft
decoder is much harder to estimate in these conditions.
Inversions
• No sooner … than …
• Scarcely/hardly … when/before …
Not only do stochastic geometric models account for
! random
locations of network entities, but they also
provide tractable results for performance metrics
Correcting
Common English
Mistakes
Recommendation
!• To allow to do something