Dietary Reference Values of Individual Micronutrients and Nutriomes For DNA Damage Prevention
Dietary Reference Values of Individual Micronutrients and Nutriomes For DNA Damage Prevention
2010; 91(5):1438S-1454S
Michael Fenech
CSIRO Food and Nutritional Sciences
GENOME HEALTH NUTRIGENOMICS LABORATORY
michael.fenech@csiro.au
Overview
Biomarkers used to study DNA damage in humans
NPB
dicentric
MN
Acknowledgement
John RK Savage
Atlas Genet Cytogenet
Oncol Haematol. July 2000
Genome damage
Micronuclei
Odds Ratio
HRN
N=24 12
10
8
6 P=0.006
LYMPHOCYTE 4
P=0.003
MICRONUCLEI 2
MEASURED AT 0
>19.3 >28.0 >36.7
18 WKS
MN-BN ‰
GESTATION
Risk of cancer increases with
higher MN frequency
6,983 subjects
275 cancer cases
PROBABILITY OF SURVIVING
WITHOUT CANCER
MN<
MN<1‰
1650 subjects
111 deaths
39 due to CVD
MN>1‰
MN>1‰ Mean age 65 y
Federici C et al
MN frequency
15
p < 0.0001
100
10
75
5
%
50
0
AD PD CONTROL
25
0
AD PD CONTROL
50 What is the
MN per 1000 BN cells
threshold of
40 DNA damage
we should
allow?
30
Can we design
20
“exposomes”
that enable us
10 to stay below
this threshold?
0
46-55
56-65
66-75
76-90
26-35
36-45
18-25
AGE (years)
Fenech et al. 2000
CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF GENOME DAMAGE
GENOME
DAMAGE IN: HIGHER
RISK
GERMLINE
E MALNUTRITION
X EMBRYO
DEVELOPMENTAL
GENETIC
DEGENERATIVE
P LIFE-STYLE FOETUS
DISEASES
AND
O GENOTOXINS
ACQUIRED
BABY
S PSYCHOLOGICAL SUSCEPT-
O STRESS
IBILITY CHILD
M ENVIRONMENTAL TEENAGER
E GENOTOXINS
YOUNG ADULT
LOWER
OLDER ADULT RISK
Italy Germany USA
H
E
A
NUTRIOME L GENOME
T
H
THF DHF
METHIONINE dUMP
SHMT1
MTR VIT B6
VIT B12
TS
SAM (CoIII)
MTRR 5,10-MeTHF
DNA MTR dTMP
VIT B12
(CoI)
MTHFR
VIT B2
HOMOCYSTEINE
5-MeTHF
20ul blood
Nutrients
Seed
Lymphocytes Mitogen Cytochalasin B
(cytokinesis
blocking agent)
Image
acquisition
1h 20 h 44 h and analysis
A ,B, C
A B C
NUCLEAR
DIVISION
INDEX
D E D,E
CBMN
CYTOME
ASSAY CELL DEATH
F G H F, G, H
DNA DAMAGE
[A] [B] NUCLEAR BUDS
MICRONUCLEATED CELLS
40 15
ANOVA P < 0.0001
ANOVA P<0.0001
MNed BNs/1000 BNs *
Buds/1000 BNs
30 *
** 10
20
**
5
10
0 0
12 24 60 120 12 24 60 120
folic acid in medium (nM) folic acid in medium (nM)
[D]
URACIL
[C]
NUCLEOPLASMIC BRIDGES
10.0 50
ANOVA P<0.0001 * *
* ANOVA P < 0.0001
pg uracil / g DNA
40
NPB/1000 BNs
7.5
**
30
5.0
20
2.5
10
0.0 0
12 24 60 120 12 24 60 120
[folic acid] in medium (nM) [folic acid] in medium (nM)
Crott et al. Carcinogenesis 2001
Genome damage induction by Folic acid deficiency is of a similar
magnitude as that induced by unsafe doses of ionising radiation
IAEA annual safe exposure limit ie equivalent to 0.1-0.5 rad X-rays
35
Crott & Fenech 2002
30
MNed BNs/1000 BNs
25
15
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
0 5 10 20 rad X-rays
120 60 24 12 nM folic acid
“normal”
serum folate
concentration
Randomised, placebo-controlled dietary intervention
PLACEBO FOLB12
* blood sample
Fenech et al. 1998 Carcinogenesis
Supplementation with 3.5 times RDI folic acid & vit B12
reduces micronucleus index by 25 % in subjects with
above average chromosome instability
Low MNed cell freq. High MNed cell freq.
at R1. [N = 17] at R1. [N = 16]
ANOVA P = 0.65 ANOVA P < 0.0005
MNed cells per 1000 BN cells
12
9
* *
0
R1 R1 R2 R2 R3 R3
7ug B12 20ug B12
Fenech et al. 1998 Carcinogenesis Base-line
700ug FA 2mg FA
serum B12 vs MN
MICRONUCLEUS FREQUENCY IS MINIMISED frequency in
WHEN
men aged 50-70 years who
HOMOCYSTEINE < 7.5umol/l and were
B12not
> 300pmol/l
vitamin B12 deficient
N = 48 R=-
R=-0.31
150 100
0 M N frequency vs plasma HC in
0 0 10 20 30
men (50-70years) who were not40
0 5 10 15 20 MN frequency
deficient in per
B121000 BN cells
or folate
MNed cells per 1000 BN cells
R = 0.4148 P = 0.0086 N = 39
20
N = 48
plasma HC (mol/l)
R = 0.392 15
15
P = 0.006
plasma HC [mol/l]
10 10
5
5
0
0 5 10 15 20 0
0 10 20 30 40
MNed cells per 1000 BN cells
MN frequency per 1000 BN cells
Fenech et al. 1998 Carcinogenesis Fenech et al. (1997) Carcinogenesis
Eussen SJ et al 2005
* P < 0.006
70 * * mid-tertile
% variation in MN freq
60
50 * highest tertile
40 *
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30 *
-40 * * *
-50 *
* *
Folate
-Carotene
Nicotinic acid
Biotin
Riboflavin
Pantothenic acid
Retinol
Vitamin E
Calcium
Fenech et al.
Carcinogenesis
(2005)
Fenech et al 2005 Carcinogenesis; Fenech 2010 AJCN
(a) COMBINED EFFECT OF FOLATE AND CALCIUM (b) COMBINED EFFECT OF FOLATE AND
INTAKE ON MN FREQUENCY RIBOFLAVIN INTAKE ON MN FREQUENCY
0 50
* *
% VARIATION
40
% VARIATION
-10
FOLATE 30 RIBOFLAVIN
-20 INTAKE
INTAKE 20
-30 * low tertile 10 low tertile
-40
* * mid tertile 0 mid tertile
high tertile -10 high tertile
-50
* -20
-60
* * -30 *
-70 -40
*
low tertile mid tertile high tertile low tertile mid tertile high tertile
MORE RIBOFLAVIN
The combined effect of (a) calcium and folate intake and (b) riboflavin
IN A LOW FOLATE
and folate intake on MN frequency. Results shown are the % variation
BACKGROUND
relative to the combined lowest tertiles of intake in the pair of nutrients
MAY BE
examined. * P < 0.05 for comparison with the referent value for the
GENOTOXIC
combined lowest tertile of intake for the pair of nutrients examined.
Q. Which dietary
AMOUNTS pattern
IN 100g will work for
EXPRESSED AS %your
OF genotype
MIMIMUM ?
REQUIREMENT FOR OPTIMUM GENOME HEALTH
A. It depends on the “nutriome” of the foods you prefer to eat
300
CALCIUM
FOLATE
200 NIACIN
VITAMIN E
BETA-CAROTENE
100 RETINOL
0
)
)
EA DS
SE
N
A
ED
ED
ED
A
N
EE
N
A
K
N
IL
O
TB
N
O
EE AN
O
H
A
LM
O
C
B
(C
(C
(
A
LI
H
F
W
O
D
N
C
ED
TU
C
B
O
H
R
C
TELOMERE SHORTENING OR
DYSFUNCTION INCREASES
RISK FOR CANCER AND
ACCELERATED SENESCENCE
SHORTER TELOMERES ARE ASSOCIATED
PROSPECTIVELY WITH INCREASED RISK FOR CANCER
MULTIVARIATE HAZARD
RATIO FOR CANCER INCIDENCE
3.5
3
2.5
2 LONG
1.5 MEDIUM
SHORT
1
0.5
0
1st Qtr
LEUKOCYTE
TELOMERE LENGTH
Wong & Collins Lancet 2003 Willeit P et al, JAMA. 2010; 304(1):69-75.
Thomas et al, Mech Aging Dev, 2008
175 a
a
Absolute telomere length
50 a
(Kb per diploid genome)
ls
ls
D
ls
ls
rA
A
ro
ro
rA
A
ro
ro
er
nt
nt
er
nt
nt
ge
ge
ld
co
co
ld
co
co
un
un
O
O
ld
Yo
g
ld
Yo
un
O
un
Yo
Yo
WBC TL <115 Kb per diploid genome Buccal TL <40 kb per diploid genome
OR of being diagnosed with AD is 10.8 OR of being identified with AD is 4.6
specificity 46% sensitivity 92.9%. specificity 63% sensitivity 72.7%.
young controls (N=30), old controls (N=26), younger AD (N=14), older AD (N=18).
LONGER SHORTER
TELOMERES
FOLATE PUFA
VITAMIN D OBESITY
Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Aug;34(8):1345-8; Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 May;91(5):1273-80. Rejuvenation Res. 2009
Oct;12(5):341-9. ; Rejuvenation Res. 2009 Jun;12(3):169-76. J Nutr. 2009 Jul;139(7):1273-8; Am J Clin Nutr.
2009 Jun;89(6):1857-63. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Nov;86(5):1420-5.
Bull & Fenech Proc. Br Nutr Soc 2008
ANTIOXIDANT
DEFICIENCY
8-OHdG
OR OXIDATIVE
STRESS
BREAKS IN
TELOMERE
URACIL
?
DYSFUNCTIONAL
REDUCED AND/OR SHORT
TRF1, TRF2 TELOMERES;
FOLATE TELOMERE END
DEFICIENCY BINDING
FUSIONS;
AND CIN
? HYPO-
METHYLATED
SUBTELOMERE LOSS OF
TELOMERE
LENGTH
CONTROL
NIACIN OR
? REDUCED
NICOTINIC
TANK1
ACID
ACTIVITY
DEFICIENCY
TELOMERE DAMAGE CASCADE
High protein (TWD) or high carbohydrate
(HC) weight-loss diets reverse telomere
shortening in rectum in over-weight men
18.2
TWD HC
15.6
Telomere length (kb)
7.8
5.2
2.6
0.0
0 12 52 0 12 52
O’Callaghan, Clifton, Noakes,
Noakes, Fenech.
Rejuvenation Res. 2009 weeks on diet
IS A COMPREHENSIVE SET OF DNA
DAMAGE BIOMARKERS NEEDED
FOR PERSONALISED NUTRITION AND
DRV DETERMINATION FOR GENOME
DAMAGE PREVENTION?
Fenech M (2010) Am. J. Clin.
Clin. Nutr.
Nutr.
RBC MN ASSAY
COMET ASSAY
MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY
IN BUCCAL CELLS ?
MICRONUCLEUS
ASSAY IN ?
ERYTHROCYTES
DNA STRAND BREAKS
IN LYMPHOCYTES BY ?
COMET ASSAY
DNA OXIDATION
?
DNA METHYLATION
?
TELOMERE LENGTH IN
LEUKOCYTES OR ?
LYMPHOCYTES
MITOCHONDRIAL
DNA DELETION ?
PROPOSED ROAD-MAP TO DETERMINE
DRVs FOR GENOME STABILITY
VERIFICATION OF EFFICACY
GENOME HEALTH - NUTRIENT STATUS - GENOTYPE
NUTRIGENOMICS
EXPERT ADVICE SYSTEM
FEEDBACK TO DATABASE
DATA BASE
INDIVIDUALISED NUTRITION
DIETARY PATTERNS - FUNCTIONAL FOODS - SUPPLEMENTS
CHORI (USA)
Bruce Ames,
Susan Mashiyama
INTEREST
O’Callaghan, Clifton, Noakes,
Noakes, Fenech. Rejuvenation Res. 2009
Image
acquisition
and analysis
Nuclear
9 day culture stain/Fix
Micronucleus
promotes inhibits??
inhibits promotes
DHF
Spermine
dTMP
Protein
Putrescine dcSAM Synthesis
MTHFR
Vit. B2
Vit. B12
DNA & Protein Homocysteine Cob(I)
5-Methyl THF
Methylation CBS
RFC-1 Cytoplasm
Extra Cellular
Trans-Sulphuration
Pathway Folic Acid
monoglutamate
Diet
Cancers are genetically and epigenetically very different from normal tissue
in the same person and from each other across persons.
Some cancers amplify the high affinity folate receptor and may benefit from
folate restriction.
7-10 days
for cells
to migrate
from basal
layer to
keratinised
layer
MICRONUCLEI KARYORRHEXIS
3 60
p = 0.0003
p<0.0001
50
2 40
30
1 20
10
0 0
ER
LS
LS
LS
ER
S
LS
N
N
O
M
W
M
W
TR
TR
TR
EI
TR
O
EI
O
D
H
N
N
LZ
LZ
O
O
C
C
A
A
ER
ER
ER
ER
G
LD
LD
N
N
O
O
U
U
YO
YO
CONDENSED CHROMATIN BASAL CELLS
75 100
p<0.0001
p<0.0001
75
50
50
25
25
0 0
ER
LS
LS
LS
ER
S
LS
N
N
O
W
M
O
M
W
TR
TR
TR
EI
TR
O
EI
O
H
D
N
N
LZ
LZ
O
O
C
C
A
A
ER
ER
ER
ER
LD
G
LD
N
N
O
O
U
U
YO
YO
Buccal Micronucleus Cytome Assay &
Alzheimer Disease Risk
PPV = 98%; NPV = 77%;
Sensitivity = 82%, Specificity = 97%
LR = 25, OR = 140 for Biomarker 1+2 < 41
150
AD
AD & MCI
CONTROLS
CONTROLS
BIOMARKER 2
karyorrhexis
100
50
0
0 50 100 150 200
BIOMARKER 1
Basal cells
Fenech & Thomas 2007 Mutagenesis
Thomas P et al 2008; Wang J et al 2009
R
N
SE
SE
O
G
C
C
M
D
D
D
T
DNA damage in
A
W
D
A
Buccal cells
4
ab
2
DNA damage in
1 bone marrow cells
R
N
SE
SE
U
CO
G
C
C
M
D
AD
T
AD
A
W
D
A
Fenech M 2007 Nature Protocols
A B C
D E
CYTOME
F G H
Centromere
dysfunction Chromosome
Cytosine Loss or
Hypome-
Malsegregation,
thylation Telomere
Folate/B12 Micronucleus
dysfunction formation
choline
deficiency Uracil
Telomere Telomere
Oxidised shortening end fusion
Deficiency DNA
of antioxidant bases CHROMOSOME
INSTABILITY
Vitamins and mtDNA ACCELERATED BFB PHENOTPYE
Cofactors of deletion SENESCENCE CYCLES &
Antioxidant Unrepaired ABERRANT
enzymes DNA KARYOTYPE
adducts Base
Sequence Anaphase
mutation bridge
DNA break or deletion formation
Deficiency of misrepair
Cofactors Dicentric
of DNA chromosomes
Repair Micronucleus
enzymes Unrepaired formation
DNA breaks Acentric
Chromosome
fragments
Ageing causes hypomethylation of satellite DNA which
leads to loss of ch 1, 9, 16 and micronucleus formation
50
45
40
35
30
Mned cells
25 (%)
20
Bright Mni
15
(%)
10
5
0
YOUNG OLD AZAC 33
32PDLs 71PDLs PDLs
Protein/ Caloric
Methionine Restriction
restriction Mimetics
VISFATIN
SIRT1
KNOWN
CALORIC
RESTRICTION
MIMETICS:
XENOHORMETIC AGENTS??
DISCOVERY OF CALORIC RESTRICTION MIMETICS
DECELERATED AGEING
HEALTHY OPTIMAL
GENOME RESVERATROL FAT LEVEL
•DNA repair
•Oncogenes silenced
•Compact chromatin
+
SIRTUIN DEACETYLASE
ACTIVATION
•Oxidants
•Excess Calories - PPAR-γ
•DNA misrepair NAD
EXCESS
DAMAGED
NICOTINIC ACID FAT
GENOME
TRYPTOPHAN
ACCELERATED AGEING
Howitz et al Nature 2004
ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSORS MAJOR LIFE EVENTS TRAUMA, ABUSE
(work, home, neighbourhood)
PERCEIVED STRESS
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSES
(genes,development, experiences) (fight or flight, smoking, drink,
diet, exercise)
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE
ALLOSTASIS ADAPTATION
ALLOSTATIC LOAD
Correlations
Huang et al Preventive Medicine 48 (2009) 383-388
VERIFICATION OF EFFICACY
GENOME HEALTH - NUTRIENT STATUS - GENOTYPE
NUTRIGENOMICS
EXPERT ADVICE SYSTEM
FEEDBACK TO DATABASE
DATA BASE
INDIVIDUALISED NUTRITION
DIETARY PATTERNS - FUNCTIONAL FOODS - SUPPLEMENTS