INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SOUTH COTABATO Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2018 - March 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Weight Performance Indicators

per Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline KRA Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No acceptable
Education Knowledge and of content within and of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its evidence was
integration within integration within integration within integration within shown
Services Pedagogy across curriculum and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
teaching areas areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

7.50%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV 1 using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and the given MOV evidence was
and supported by supported by any 1 supported by any 1 shown
any 1 of the other of the other given of the other given
given MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
Education teaching strategies different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
Services that enhance learner promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading,
achievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.50%
 Weight Performance Indicators
per Very Actual Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline KRA Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
learnercentered learnercentered learnercentered learnercentered evidence was
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lesson as evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of the
and supported by and supported by and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range of Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
Services develop critical and and creative and creative and creative and creative
creative thinking, as thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
well as other other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
higherorder thinking shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
skills. with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.50%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by any evidence was
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1 of the given MOV shown
1 and supported by supported by any 1 supported by any 1
any 1 of the other of the other given of the other given
given MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education Environment structure to engage management management management management evidence was
learners, individually strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
Services and Diversity of engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
Learners or in groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
meaningful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
exploration, discovery with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
and hands-on activities
within a range of 7.50%
physical learning
environments

Weight Performance Indicators

Very Actual Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
KRA QET Results
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons supported supported by MOV supported by MOV supported by any of evidence was
by MOV 1 and any 1 1 and any 1 of the 1 and any 1 of the the acceptable MOV shown
of the other other acceptable other acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Education behavior management management management management evidence was
strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
Services constructively by behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
applying positive and promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
non-violent discipline and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
to ensure discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
learningfocused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
environments.

7.50%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Education differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence
teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
Services developmentally to address learner to address learner to address learner to address learner
appropriate learning diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
gender, needs,
strengths, interests 7.50%
and experiences.

Weight Performance Indicators

per Very Actual Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline KRA Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence
teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown No
in at least 2 lessons in at least 2 lessons in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as acceptable
as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by MOV evidently shown in evidence was
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1 and supported by any 1 of the show
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
of the other of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Education and Planning and implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
Services developmentally sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process
and learning as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as as shown in MOV 1
processes to meet with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
curriculum

7.50%
 Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
7.50% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown
and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process
as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Weight Performance Indicators

per Very Actual Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline KRA Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable
Education collegial discussions participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
Services that use teacher and meetings to discuss meetings to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback to teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as shown
practice instruction as shown instruction as shown instruction as shown in the MOV
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

7.50%

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ meeting evidence was
meetings as meetings as meetings as as evidently shown shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in any 1 of the given
any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No acceptable
Education developed, organized varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was
learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, shown
Services and used appropriate including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
teaching and learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, including goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
ICT, to address MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
learning goals of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

7.50% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
varied teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Weight Performance Indicators
per Very Actual Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline KRA Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
Education and Reporting selected, organized organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown
Services and used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent
with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum
requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.50%
 7.50%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable
Education evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress and shown
Services progress and progress and progress and progress and achievement using
achievement using achievement using achievement using achievement using learner attainment
learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment data as shown in the
data data as shown in the data as shown in the data as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

7.50%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV shown
acceptable MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV was No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed completed in only 1 evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters quarter shown

Weight Performance Indicators

per Very Actual Rating
MFOs KRAs Objective Timeline KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Score
QET Satisfactory Results
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 12. Communicated Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable
Education promptly and clearly prompt and clear prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was
communication of communication of clear communication of shown
Services the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and progress and progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key progress and achievement to key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including including parents/ including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians as shown guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown
parents/guardians. in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
submitted submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted

7.50%

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

evidence was
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV shown
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV was No acceptable
evidence was
were distributed were distributed were distributed completed in only 1 shown
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters quarter

Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Education various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
related related related work/activities that shown
Services works/activities that work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
teaching-learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown in
process. process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in the MOV submitted
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
10.00%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness
RATING FOR
OVERALL
ACCOMPLISHM
ENTS

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Strengths Development Needs

A. Functional Competence

B. Core Behavioral Competence

Feedback :

Ratee: Rater:

LOIDA S. SANDOVAL ROEL R. PENAFLORIDA

Master Teacher I School Principal I
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan Resources

Timeline
(Recommended Developmental Needs) Needed

APPROVING AUTHORITY

MARIO M. MADRERO
OIC-Assist. Schools Division Superintendent