100% found this document useful (1 vote)
203 views8 pages

Ramanujan Cubic Polynomials

1. The document provides a full description of Ramanujan cubic polynomials, which are cubic polynomials with real roots that satisfy a specific condition involving the polynomial's coefficients. 2. It is proven that all Ramanujan cubic polynomials have a particular form involving parameters γ and r, and that formulas can be derived for sums of cube roots of the polynomial's roots. 3. Additional results are presented regarding a parameter of Ramanujan cubic polynomials called the Shevelev parameter, including deriving an inequality and determining the number of possible polynomials with a given value of this parameter.

Uploaded by

vodka
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
203 views8 pages

Ramanujan Cubic Polynomials

1. The document provides a full description of Ramanujan cubic polynomials, which are cubic polynomials with real roots that satisfy a specific condition involving the polynomial's coefficients. 2. It is proven that all Ramanujan cubic polynomials have a particular form involving parameters γ and r, and that formulas can be derived for sums of cube roots of the polynomial's roots. 3. Additional results are presented regarding a parameter of Ramanujan cubic polynomials called the Shevelev parameter, including deriving an inequality and determining the number of possible polynomials with a given value of this parameter.

Uploaded by

vodka
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

1

2 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 13 (2010),


3
47 6
Article 10.5.7
23 11

Full Description of Ramanujan


Cubic Polynomials

Roman Witula
Institute of Mathematics
Silesian University of Technology
Kaszubska 23
Gliwice 44-100
Poland
roman.witula@polsl.pl

Dedicated to Vladimir Shevelev – for his inspiration

Abstract
We give a full description of the Ramanujan cubic polynomials, introduced and first
investigated by V. Shevelev. We also present some applications of this result.

1 Introduction
Shevelev [2] called the cubic polynomial
x3 + p x 2 + q x + r (1)
a Ramanujan cubic polynomial (RCP), if it has real roots x1 , x2 , x3 and the condition
p r1/3 + 3 r2/3 + q = 0 (2)
is satisfied. It should be noticed, that if x1 , x2 , x3 are roots of RCP of the form (1), then the
following formulas hold (see [2, 5]):
 1/3
1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3
x1 + x2 + x3 = −p − 6 r + 3 (9 r − p q) , (3)
 1/3
(x1 x2 )1/3 + (x1 x3 )1/3 + (x2 x3 )1/3 = q + 6 r2/3 − 3 (9 r2 − p q r)1/3 , (4)

1
and Shevelev’s formula [2]:
 x 1/3  x 1/3  x 1/3  x 1/3  x 1/3  x 1/3  p q 1/3
1 2 1 3 2 3
+ + + + + = −9 . (5)
x2 x1 x3 x1 x3 x2 r
We note that (3) easily implies all three Ramanujan equalities
 1 1/3  2 1/3  4 1/3 √
3
1/3
− + = 2−1 , (6)
9 9 9 √
 2 π 1/3  4 π 1/3  8 π 1/3  5 − 3 3 7 1/3
cos + cos + cos = , (7)
7 7 7 √ 2
 2 π 1/3  4 π 1/3  8 π 1/3  3 3 9 − 6 1/3
cos + cos + cos = , (8)
9 9 9 2
since the following decompositions of polynomials hold: (19), which implies (6) after some
algebraic transformations for every r ∈ R \ {0} (the equality (6) we obtain by setting r =
8/729), (28), which implies (7) and at last (10), which implies (8).
In [2] many interesting and fundamental properties of RCP’s are presented.
The object of this paper is to prove the following fact
Theorem 1. All RCP’s have the following form
P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
x3 − r1/3 x2 − r2/3 x + r =
(γ − 1) (γ − 2) (1 − γ) (2 − γ)
 r1/3    2 − γ 1/3 
= x− x − (γ − 1) r1/3 x − r , (9)
2−γ 1−γ
where r ∈ R \ {0}, γ ∈ R \ {1, 2}, and
3
 2π 4π 8π
P (γ) := γ − 3 γ + 1 = γ − 2 cos γ − 2 cos γ − 2 cos . (10)
9 9 9
Corollary 2. From formulas (3), (4) and (5) for the sums of the real cube root of the roots
of polynomial (9), the following equalities can be generated
2 p
γ 3 − 9 γ − 1 + 3 γ 2 − 3 γ + 3 3 (γ − 1) (γ − 2) =
p p p 3
= 3 3 2 3 2
1 − γ − (2 − γ) (1 − γ) + (2 − γ) , (11)

p
γ 3 − 9 γ + 9 − 3 γ 2 − 3 γ + 3 3 (γ − 1) (γ − 2) =
p p p 3
= 3 3 2 3 2
2 − γ − (1 − γ) (2 − γ) − (1 − γ) , (12)

which, after replacing γ := 3 − γ, is equivalent to (11);


s s
1 p3 1 − γ 2−γ
+ (2 − γ) (1 − γ) − 3
+ 3
+
(2 − γ)2 (1 − γ)2
p
3
(2 − γ) (1 − γ)
s s !3
(1 − γ) 2 (2 − γ) 2 P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
+ 3 − 3 =9− , (13)
2−γ 1−γ (γ − 1)2 (2 − γ)2

2
i.e., 3
γ 2 − 3 γ + 3 = 9 (γ − 1)2 (2 − γ)2 − P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ). (14)
The above relations essentially supplement the set of identities presented in [1]. Further-
more, (11)–(14) entail Ramanujan’s equalities (6)–(8), as well as all the other expressions of
this type discussed in [2, 4, 5].
In the second part of this paper we will discuss an important Shevelev parameter prq
of RCP’s having the form (1). We note, that from (17) the following Shevelev inequality
follows:
pq 9
≤ . (15)
r 4
We remark that for every a ∈ R, a ≤ 49 , there exist at most six different sets of RCP’s,
depending only on values r and having the same value of prq , equal to a. In the sequel,
there exist only two sets of RCP’s, depending on r ∈ R, having the value prq = 2 (see the
descriptions (40) and (41)). However, there is only one family of RCP’s, depending on r ∈ R
with prq = 49 (see the descriptions (19)). This fact is proven in Section 2, but it independently
results from (31), (9), (14) and from the following identity
3
pq (γ − 1) (γ − 2) + 1
=9− 2 . (16)
r (γ − 1) (γ − 2)

From (16) we get


pq 9 n 1 o n 3 o
= ⇔ t := (γ − 1) (γ − 2) ∈ − , 2 ⇔ γ ∈ 0, , 3 ,
r 4 4 2
since we have
d (t + 1)3  (t + 1)2
9− = t (2 − t) .
dt t2 t4
 3
All three values γ ∈ 0, 2 , 3 generate the same set of RCP’s of the form (19).

2 Proof of Theorem 1
Let us indicate that from condition (2) the following equality follows (see [2]):
9 p q 3 p 2
− = + 1/3 . (17)
4 r 2 r
Let  3  1/3
p := α − r .
2
By (17) we have
pq 9
= − α2 ,
r 4
 3  2/3
q =− α+ r .
2

3
In other words, an RCP has the form
3
 3  1/3 2  3  2/3
x + α− r x − α+ r x+r (18)
2 2
for some α, r ∈ R. If α = 0, the following decomposition holds
3 3  1 
x3 − r1/3 x2 − r2/3 x + r = x − r1/3 x + r1/3 x − 2 r1/3 .
 
(19)
2 2 2
Accordingly, the roots x1 , x2 , x3 of the polynomial (18) have the form (r 6= 0):
1 
+ β r1/3 , x2 = −1 + γ r1/3 , x3 = 2 + δ r1/3
 
x1 = (20)
2
for certain β, γ, δ ∈ R. Then from Vieta’s formulae the following equations can be obtained

α=− β+γ+δ , (21)
1   1     3
+ β −1 + γ + + β 2 + δ + −1 + γ 2 + δ = −α − , (22)
2 2 2
1   
+ β −1 + γ 2 + δ = 1. (23)
2
From (21) and (22) we receive
3
(δ − γ) − δ γ
β= 2 , (24)
δ+γ
which, by (23), implies
δ 2 γ 2 − 3 γ + 2 + δ 3 γ 2 − 7 γ + 3 + 2 γ 2 − 3 γ = 0.
 

Hence, after some manipulations, we get


2
∆δ = γ 2 − 3 γ + 3 ,
and next
γ 3 − 2γ
δ= or δ= . (25)
1−γ γ−2
γ γ
If we choose δ = 1−γ , then by (24) we have β = 2 (2−γ)
, and by (20) we obtain
r1/3 2 − γ 1/3
x1 = , x2 = (γ − 1) r1/3 , x3 = r ,
2−γ 1−γ
(26)
 γ γ  −2 γ 3 + 9 γ 2 − 9 γ
α=− +γ+ = .
2 (2 − γ) 1−γ 2 (γ − 1) (γ − 2)
Finally
−γ 3 + 3 γ 2 − 3 1/3 2 γ 3 − 6 γ 2 + 9 γ − 3 2/3
x3 + r x + r x+r =
(γ − 1) (γ − 2) (γ − 1) (γ − 2)
 r1/3    2 − γ 1/3 
= x− x − (γ − 1) r1/3 x − r , (27)
2−γ 1−γ
which is compatible with (9).
On the other hand, if we choose δ = 3−2 γ−2
γ
, then β = γ−3
2 (γ−1)
, and we obtain the same
values of x1 , x2 , x3 and α as in (26) above. 

4
Example 3. Since
 2π 4π 8π
x − 2 cos x − 2 cos x − 2 cos = x3 + x2 − 2 x − 1 (28)
7 7 7
is the RCP [4], then, from (9) the following relations can be deduced

γ = 1 − 2 cos , r = −1,
7
P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
= 1 and = 2,
(1 − γ) (2 − γ) (1 − γ) (2 − γ)

which implies the equalities


1 4π γ−2 8π
= 2 cos , = 2 cos ,
γ−2 7 1−γ 7

cos 27π + cos 29π cos 27π + cos 49π cos 27π + cos 89π
  
1
2π 2π
 =− , (29)
cos 7 1 + 2 cos 7 4
and the equivalent one
1
+ cos 27π − cos 29π 1
+ cos 27π − cos 49π 1
+ cos 27π − cos 89π
  
2 2 2 1
= . (30)
cos 27π 1 + 2 cos 27π

2

pq
3 Values of for RCP’s
r
By (9) we obtain
pq P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
= . (31)
r (γ − 1)2 (2 − γ)2
pq
The examples of RCP’s, which are given in [4, 5] (see also [2]), are produced by r
equal
only to 2, −40, −180.
The following theorem holds.

Theorem 4. For every a ≤ 49 there exist at most six different sets of RCP’s, depending on
r ∈ R, having the same value of prq , equal to a.

Proof. The proof of this theorem results easily from inequality (15) and from relation (31).

pq
We will present now a series of remarks, connected with the parameter a = r
.

Remark 5. Let us consider the following equation

P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
=a (a ∈ R). (32)
(γ − 1)2 (2 − γ)2

5
This equation, by (16), after substitution t := (γ − 1) (γ − 2), is equivalent to the following
one
R(t) := t3 + (a − 6) t2 + 3 t + 1 = 0. (33)
a−6
If we replace t in (33) by τ − 3
, then the canonical form of R(t) can be generated

1 2  2
τ3 + 3 − a−6 τ+ (a − 6)3 − (a − 6) + 1. (34)
3 27
But the polynomial (34) has only one real root, if and only if

1 2 2 1 1 2 3
(a − 6)3 − (a − 6) + 1 + 3− a−6 > 0 ⇐⇒
4 27 27 3
4 1  9
⇐⇒ (a − 6)3 − (a − 6)2 − 2 (a − 6) + 5 > 0 ⇐⇒ (a − 9)2 a − > 0.
27 3 4
9
Since the case a = 4
was discussed in (19), the polynomial R(t) has three real roots for every
a ≤ 94 .

Remark 6. If γ0 ∈ C is a root of equation (32) (for fixed a ∈ C) then also γ = 3 − γ0


γ0
and γ = 1−γ 0
are roots of this one. We note, that the last fact derives from the following
identities  1 
(1 − γ)3 P = P (2 − γ)
γ−1
and γ − 2
(1 − γ)3 P = P (γ − 1).
γ−1
Consequently, the roots of (32) are also
3 − γ0 3 − γ0 γ0 3 − 4 γ0 3 − γ0 4 γ0 − 9
γ= = , γ =3− = , γ =3− = .
1 − (3 − γ0 ) γ0 − 2 1 − γ0 1 − γ0 γ0 − 2 γ0 − 2

Remark 7. Let us separately discuss equation (32) for a = 2. After substitution t = 1−τ
in (33), the following equation is derived

τ 3 + τ 2 − 2 τ − 1 = 0, (35)

i.e. (see [4]):


 2π 4π 8π
τ − 2 cos τ − 2 cos τ − 2 cos = 0. (36)
7 7 7
Hence, equation (32) for a = 2 is equivalent to each of the following three equations
2π 4π 4π
(γ − 1) (γ − 2) = 1 − 2 cos ⇐⇒ γ − 1 = −2 cos ∨ γ − 2 = 2 cos , (37)
7 7 7
or
4π 8π 8π
(γ − 1) (γ − 2) = 1 − 2 cos ⇐⇒ γ − 1 = −2 cos ∨ γ − 2 = 2 cos , (38)
7 7 7

6
or
8π 2π 2π
(γ − 1) (γ − 2) = 1 − 2 cos ⇐⇒ γ − 1 = −2 cos ∨ γ − 2 = 2 cos . (39)
7 7 7
For the values n 2k π o
γ ∈ 1 − 2 cos : k = 1, 2, 3 ,
7
we obtain the same set of RCP’s

x3 + r1/3 x2 − 2 r2/3 x − r, r ∈ R. (40)

On the other hand, for values


n 2k π o
γ ∈ 2 + 2 cos : k = 1, 2, 3 ,
7
we obtain the following set of RCP’s

x3 − 2 r1/3 x2 − r2/3 x + r, r ∈ R. (41)

We note, that RCP of the form (see [2, 4]):

x3 + 7 x2 − 98 x − 343 =
  
2π  2π 8 π 3 4π  2π 4 π 3
= x − 128 cos sin sin x − 128 cos sin sin ·
7 7 7 7 7 7
 
8π  4π 8 π 3
· x − 128 cos sin sin
7 7 7
pq
belongs to the set (40) of RCP’s with r
= 2 for r = 73 , because of the following remark.
Remark 8. Suppose, that α ∈ { 2π
7
, 4π
7
, 8π
7
}. Then, we have sin α = sin 8α, which implies

sin 2α 2 sin 2α sin α 3 3


14 cos α = 7 = 8 sin α sin 2α sin 4α = 64 sin 2α sin 4α =
sin α sin α sin 4α
sin 8α 3 3 3
= 64 sin 2α sin 4α = 128 cos 4α sin 2α sin 4α .
sin 4α

References
[1] B. C. Berndt, H. H. Chan and L.-Ch. Zhang, Radicals and units in Ramanujan’s work,
Acta Arith. 87 (1998), 145–158.

[2] V. Shevelev, On Ramanujan Cubic Polynomials, preprint,


http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3420, 2007.

[3] N. J. A. Sloane, The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, available electronically


at http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/, 2010.

7
[4] R. Witula and D. Slota, New Ramanujan-type formulas and quasi-Fibonacci numbers
of order 7, J. Integer Seq. 10 (2007), Article 07.5.6.

[5] R. Witula, Ramanujan type trigonometric formulas: the general form for the argument

7
, J. Integer Seq. 12 (2009), Article 09.8.5.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 11C08; Secondary 11B83, 33B10.


Keywords: Ramanujan cubic polynomial.

Received December 1 2009; revised versions received March 2 2010; May 4 2010. Published
in Journal of Integer Sequences, May 5 2010.

Return to Journal of Integer Sequences home page.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy