Ramanujan Cubic Polynomials
Ramanujan Cubic Polynomials
Roman Witula
Institute of Mathematics
Silesian University of Technology
Kaszubska 23
Gliwice 44-100
Poland
roman.witula@polsl.pl
Abstract
We give a full description of the Ramanujan cubic polynomials, introduced and first
investigated by V. Shevelev. We also present some applications of this result.
1 Introduction
Shevelev [2] called the cubic polynomial
x3 + p x 2 + q x + r (1)
a Ramanujan cubic polynomial (RCP), if it has real roots x1 , x2 , x3 and the condition
p r1/3 + 3 r2/3 + q = 0 (2)
is satisfied. It should be noticed, that if x1 , x2 , x3 are roots of RCP of the form (1), then the
following formulas hold (see [2, 5]):
1/3
1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3
x1 + x2 + x3 = −p − 6 r + 3 (9 r − p q) , (3)
1/3
(x1 x2 )1/3 + (x1 x3 )1/3 + (x2 x3 )1/3 = q + 6 r2/3 − 3 (9 r2 − p q r)1/3 , (4)
1
and Shevelev’s formula [2]:
x 1/3 x 1/3 x 1/3 x 1/3 x 1/3 x 1/3 p q 1/3
1 2 1 3 2 3
+ + + + + = −9 . (5)
x2 x1 x3 x1 x3 x2 r
We note that (3) easily implies all three Ramanujan equalities
1 1/3 2 1/3 4 1/3 √
3
1/3
− + = 2−1 , (6)
9 9 9 √
2 π 1/3 4 π 1/3 8 π 1/3 5 − 3 3 7 1/3
cos + cos + cos = , (7)
7 7 7 √ 2
2 π 1/3 4 π 1/3 8 π 1/3 3 3 9 − 6 1/3
cos + cos + cos = , (8)
9 9 9 2
since the following decompositions of polynomials hold: (19), which implies (6) after some
algebraic transformations for every r ∈ R \ {0} (the equality (6) we obtain by setting r =
8/729), (28), which implies (7) and at last (10), which implies (8).
In [2] many interesting and fundamental properties of RCP’s are presented.
The object of this paper is to prove the following fact
Theorem 1. All RCP’s have the following form
P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
x3 − r1/3 x2 − r2/3 x + r =
(γ − 1) (γ − 2) (1 − γ) (2 − γ)
r1/3 2 − γ 1/3
= x− x − (γ − 1) r1/3 x − r , (9)
2−γ 1−γ
where r ∈ R \ {0}, γ ∈ R \ {1, 2}, and
3
2π 4π 8π
P (γ) := γ − 3 γ + 1 = γ − 2 cos γ − 2 cos γ − 2 cos . (10)
9 9 9
Corollary 2. From formulas (3), (4) and (5) for the sums of the real cube root of the roots
of polynomial (9), the following equalities can be generated
2 p
γ 3 − 9 γ − 1 + 3 γ 2 − 3 γ + 3 3 (γ − 1) (γ − 2) =
p p p 3
= 3 3 2 3 2
1 − γ − (2 − γ) (1 − γ) + (2 − γ) , (11)
p
γ 3 − 9 γ + 9 − 3 γ 2 − 3 γ + 3 3 (γ − 1) (γ − 2) =
p p p 3
= 3 3 2 3 2
2 − γ − (1 − γ) (2 − γ) − (1 − γ) , (12)
2
i.e., 3
γ 2 − 3 γ + 3 = 9 (γ − 1)2 (2 − γ)2 − P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ). (14)
The above relations essentially supplement the set of identities presented in [1]. Further-
more, (11)–(14) entail Ramanujan’s equalities (6)–(8), as well as all the other expressions of
this type discussed in [2, 4, 5].
In the second part of this paper we will discuss an important Shevelev parameter prq
of RCP’s having the form (1). We note, that from (17) the following Shevelev inequality
follows:
pq 9
≤ . (15)
r 4
We remark that for every a ∈ R, a ≤ 49 , there exist at most six different sets of RCP’s,
depending only on values r and having the same value of prq , equal to a. In the sequel,
there exist only two sets of RCP’s, depending on r ∈ R, having the value prq = 2 (see the
descriptions (40) and (41)). However, there is only one family of RCP’s, depending on r ∈ R
with prq = 49 (see the descriptions (19)). This fact is proven in Section 2, but it independently
results from (31), (9), (14) and from the following identity
3
pq (γ − 1) (γ − 2) + 1
=9− 2 . (16)
r (γ − 1) (γ − 2)
2 Proof of Theorem 1
Let us indicate that from condition (2) the following equality follows (see [2]):
9 p q 3 p 2
− = + 1/3 . (17)
4 r 2 r
Let 3 1/3
p := α − r .
2
By (17) we have
pq 9
= − α2 ,
r 4
3 2/3
q =− α+ r .
2
3
In other words, an RCP has the form
3
3 1/3 2 3 2/3
x + α− r x − α+ r x+r (18)
2 2
for some α, r ∈ R. If α = 0, the following decomposition holds
3 3 1
x3 − r1/3 x2 − r2/3 x + r = x − r1/3 x + r1/3 x − 2 r1/3 .
(19)
2 2 2
Accordingly, the roots x1 , x2 , x3 of the polynomial (18) have the form (r 6= 0):
1
+ β r1/3 , x2 = −1 + γ r1/3 , x3 = 2 + δ r1/3
x1 = (20)
2
for certain β, γ, δ ∈ R. Then from Vieta’s formulae the following equations can be obtained
α=− β+γ+δ , (21)
1 1 3
+ β −1 + γ + + β 2 + δ + −1 + γ 2 + δ = −α − , (22)
2 2 2
1
+ β −1 + γ 2 + δ = 1. (23)
2
From (21) and (22) we receive
3
(δ − γ) − δ γ
β= 2 , (24)
δ+γ
which, by (23), implies
δ 2 γ 2 − 3 γ + 2 + δ 3 γ 2 − 7 γ + 3 + 2 γ 2 − 3 γ = 0.
4
Example 3. Since
2π 4π 8π
x − 2 cos x − 2 cos x − 2 cos = x3 + x2 − 2 x − 1 (28)
7 7 7
is the RCP [4], then, from (9) the following relations can be deduced
2π
γ = 1 − 2 cos , r = −1,
7
P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
= 1 and = 2,
(1 − γ) (2 − γ) (1 − γ) (2 − γ)
cos 27π + cos 29π cos 27π + cos 49π cos 27π + cos 89π
1
2π 2π
=− , (29)
cos 7 1 + 2 cos 7 4
and the equivalent one
1
+ cos 27π − cos 29π 1
+ cos 27π − cos 49π 1
+ cos 27π − cos 89π
2 2 2 1
= . (30)
cos 27π 1 + 2 cos 27π
2
pq
3 Values of for RCP’s
r
By (9) we obtain
pq P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
= . (31)
r (γ − 1)2 (2 − γ)2
pq
The examples of RCP’s, which are given in [4, 5] (see also [2]), are produced by r
equal
only to 2, −40, −180.
The following theorem holds.
Theorem 4. For every a ≤ 49 there exist at most six different sets of RCP’s, depending on
r ∈ R, having the same value of prq , equal to a.
Proof. The proof of this theorem results easily from inequality (15) and from relation (31).
pq
We will present now a series of remarks, connected with the parameter a = r
.
P (γ − 1) P (2 − γ)
=a (a ∈ R). (32)
(γ − 1)2 (2 − γ)2
5
This equation, by (16), after substitution t := (γ − 1) (γ − 2), is equivalent to the following
one
R(t) := t3 + (a − 6) t2 + 3 t + 1 = 0. (33)
a−6
If we replace t in (33) by τ − 3
, then the canonical form of R(t) can be generated
1 2 2
τ3 + 3 − a−6 τ+ (a − 6)3 − (a − 6) + 1. (34)
3 27
But the polynomial (34) has only one real root, if and only if
1 2 2 1 1 2 3
(a − 6)3 − (a − 6) + 1 + 3− a−6 > 0 ⇐⇒
4 27 27 3
4 1 9
⇐⇒ (a − 6)3 − (a − 6)2 − 2 (a − 6) + 5 > 0 ⇐⇒ (a − 9)2 a − > 0.
27 3 4
9
Since the case a = 4
was discussed in (19), the polynomial R(t) has three real roots for every
a ≤ 94 .
Remark 7. Let us separately discuss equation (32) for a = 2. After substitution t = 1−τ
in (33), the following equation is derived
τ 3 + τ 2 − 2 τ − 1 = 0, (35)
6
or
8π 2π 2π
(γ − 1) (γ − 2) = 1 − 2 cos ⇐⇒ γ − 1 = −2 cos ∨ γ − 2 = 2 cos . (39)
7 7 7
For the values n 2k π o
γ ∈ 1 − 2 cos : k = 1, 2, 3 ,
7
we obtain the same set of RCP’s
x3 + 7 x2 − 98 x − 343 =
2π 2π 8 π 3 4π 2π 4 π 3
= x − 128 cos sin sin x − 128 cos sin sin ·
7 7 7 7 7 7
8π 4π 8 π 3
· x − 128 cos sin sin
7 7 7
pq
belongs to the set (40) of RCP’s with r
= 2 for r = 73 , because of the following remark.
Remark 8. Suppose, that α ∈ { 2π
7
, 4π
7
, 8π
7
}. Then, we have sin α = sin 8α, which implies
References
[1] B. C. Berndt, H. H. Chan and L.-Ch. Zhang, Radicals and units in Ramanujan’s work,
Acta Arith. 87 (1998), 145–158.
7
[4] R. Witula and D. Slota, New Ramanujan-type formulas and quasi-Fibonacci numbers
of order 7, J. Integer Seq. 10 (2007), Article 07.5.6.
[5] R. Witula, Ramanujan type trigonometric formulas: the general form for the argument
2π
7
, J. Integer Seq. 12 (2009), Article 09.8.5.
Received December 1 2009; revised versions received March 2 2010; May 4 2010. Published
in Journal of Integer Sequences, May 5 2010.