0% found this document useful (0 votes)
105 views20 pages

Assessment Creteria

The document outlines evaluation criteria for two vehicle vendors bidding on a project. It includes sections on general corporate profile, business profile, manufacturer's/product's strengths, and presentation on project proposal. Vendor 1, ADAM Motors, is described as operating for over 15 years with over 10 offices/service centers across the country and over 100 employees. Vendor 2 is VERTEX International, which will also be evaluated based on the same criteria. The bids will be evaluated based on both eligibility and technical qualifications, with technically qualified bidders advancing to the financial bid opening.

Uploaded by

Brian Thompson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
105 views20 pages

Assessment Creteria

The document outlines evaluation criteria for two vehicle vendors bidding on a project. It includes sections on general corporate profile, business profile, manufacturer's/product's strengths, and presentation on project proposal. Vendor 1, ADAM Motors, is described as operating for over 15 years with over 10 offices/service centers across the country and over 100 employees. Vendor 2 is VERTEX International, which will also be evaluated based on the same criteria. The bids will be evaluated based on both eligibility and technical qualifications, with technically qualified bidders advancing to the financial bid opening.

Uploaded by

Brian Thompson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Vender 1 : ADAM Motors, Karach

QUALIFICATION

S. # Attribute Description Max. Score

Section – I: General Corporate Profile 25


1. 7
Company in Operation since
Market Presence 4
Registration
2
2. 8
Number of offices/ services centers 5
Bidder’s Footprints
across the country
2
3.
3
Human Resource Strength Number of full-time employees
1
4. 7
Annual Turnover averaged over last 3
Financial Standing 4
years
2
Section – II: Business Profile 25
5. Project(s) of similar value and 5
Relevant Experience complexity completed in last three (03) 3
years 1
6. 5
Project(s) delivered to government
Public Sector Experience 3
organizations over last three (03) years
1
7. 5
Education Sector Project(s) completed at education
3
Experience institutions over last three (03) years
1

5
8.
Past Project(s) with activities spanning
Country-wide Scope 3
over different cities across the country

9. History of Non-Performing 5
Non-performance of contracts (if any)
during last 3 years.
Contracts 0

Section – III: Manufacturer’s/ Product’s Strengths 20


10
. Manufacturer’s Global Countries having supplied the same
5
Presence Quoted item

11
. Production Capacity Monthly capacity to produce similar item 5

12
. Products’ Portfolio Number of Models and/ or Products
5
produced by manufacturer
13
. National & International Number of national and international
5
Patents patents on manufacturer’s credit

Section – IV: Presentation on Project Proposal 30


14 Project Management Overall approach towards planning and
. Approach 10
implementing the project.
15 Overall approach towards after-sale
. Post-Delivery Services support and services.
10

16 Distinguishing features of the quoted


. Distinguishing Features Product and/ or overall project 10
proposed.
Grand Total 100
Bids shall be evaluated on both Eligibility and Technical Qualific
Technical Evaluation the Eligibility Criteria and able to secure 70 points in Technical qu
Technically Qualified Bidders for the next step, i.e. Opening of Fin

Project Director (PMEWC) : ________________________


Motors, Karachi

Criteria Value Scoring

15+ years
11 – 15 years
5 – 10 years
10+ offices/ service centers
5 – 10 offices/ service centers
< 5 officers/ service centers
100+ employees with at least
20% Technical staff
50 – 100 employees with at least
20% Technical staff
Minimum Rs. 750 million
Rs. 500 million
Rs. 250 million

10+ Projects
5 – 10 Projects
< 5 Projects
8+ Projects
5 – 8 Projects
< 5 Projects
5+ Projects
3 – 5 Projects
< 3 Project
2 Projects activities spanning
over at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over
at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over
at least 10 cities

No non-performance contracts

At least 1 non-performance
contract

No. of countries supplied by Bid


in consideration/ Max. No. of
countries in all Bids * 5
Monthly capacity by Bid in
consideration/ Max. capacity
referred in all Bids * 5
No. of models produced by Bid in
consideration/ Max. No. of
models in all Bids * 5
No. of Patents possessed by Bid
in consideration/ Max. No. of
Patents in all Bids * 5

To be assigned by the Technical


2
Committee 2
To be assigned by the Technical
5 5
Committee

To be assigned by the Technical


0
Committee
0

Technical Qualification Criteria. Bidders meeting


nts in Technical qualification shall be declared as
i.e. Opening of Financial Bid.

Evaluator Name: ________________________________

Signature : ____________________________________
Vender 2 : VERTEX International, Islam
QUALIFICATION

S. # Attribute Description Max. Score

Section – I: General Corporate Profile 25


1. 7
Company in Operation since
Market Presence 4
Registration
2
2. 8
Number of offices/ services centers 5
Bidder’s Footprints
across the country
2
3.
3
Human Resource Strength Number of full-time employees
1
4. 7
Annual Turnover averaged over last 3
Financial Standing 4
years
2
Section – II: Business Profile 25
5. Project(s) of similar value and 5
Relevant Experience complexity completed in last three (03) 3
years 1
6. 5
Project(s) delivered to government
Public Sector Experience 3
organizations over last three (03) years
1
7. 5
Education Sector Project(s) completed at education
3
Experience institutions over last three (03) years
1

5
8.
Past Project(s) with activities spanning
Country-wide Scope 3
over different cities across the country

9. History of Non-Performing 5
Non-performance of contracts (if any)
during last 3 years.
Contracts 0

Section – III: Manufacturer’s/ Product’s Strengths 20


10
. Manufacturer’s Global Countries having supplied the same
5
Presence Quoted item

11
. Production Capacity Monthly capacity to produce similar item 5

12
. Products’ Portfolio Number of Models and/ or Products
5
produced by manufacturer
13
. National & International Number of national and international
5
Patents patents on manufacturer’s credit

Section – IV: Presentation on Project Proposal 30


14 Project Management Overall approach towards planning and
. Approach 10
implementing the project.
15 Overall approach towards after-sale
. Post-Delivery Services support and services.
10

16 Distinguishing features of the quoted


. Distinguishing Features Product and/ or overall project 10
proposed.
Grand Total 100
Bids shall be evaluated on both Eligibility and Technical Qualific
Technical Evaluation the Eligibility Criteria and able to secure 70 points in Technical qu
Technically Qualified Bidders for the next step, i.e. Opening of Fin

Project Director (PMEWC) : ________________________


national, Islamabad

Criteria Value Scoring

15+ years
11 – 15 years
5 – 10 years
10+ offices/ service centers
5 – 10 offices/ service centers
< 5 officers/ service centers
100+ employees with at least
20% Technical staff
50 – 100 employees with at least
20% Technical staff
Minimum Rs. 750 million
Rs. 500 million
Rs. 250 million

10+ Projects
5 – 10 Projects
< 5 Projects
8+ Projects
5 – 8 Projects
< 5 Projects
5+ Projects
3 – 5 Projects
< 3 Project
2 Projects activities spanning
over at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over
at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over
at least 10 cities

No non-performance contracts

At least 1 non-performance
contract

No. of countries supplied by Bid


in consideration/ Max. No. of
countries in all Bids * 5
Monthly capacity by Bid in
consideration/ Max. capacity
referred in all Bids * 5
No. of models produced by Bid in
consideration/ Max. No. of
models in all Bids * 5
No. of Patents possessed by Bid
in consideration/ Max. No. of
Patents in all Bids * 5

To be assigned by the Technical


Committee
To be assigned by the Technical
Committee

To be assigned by the Technical


Committee

Technical Qualification Criteria. Bidders meeting


nts in Technical qualification shall be declared as
i.e. Opening of Financial Bid.

Evaluator Name: ________________________________

Signature : ____________________________________
Vender 3 : BMTICO, Islamabad
QUALIFICATION

S. # Attribute Description Max. Score

Section – I: General Corporate Profile 25


1. 7
Company in Operation since
Market Presence 4
Registration
2
2. 8
Number of offices/ services centers 5
Bidder’s Footprints
across the country
2
3.
3
Human Resource Strength Number of full-time employees
1
4. 7
Annual Turnover averaged over last 3
Financial Standing 4
years
2
Section – II: Business Profile 25
5. Project(s) of similar value and 5
Relevant Experience complexity completed in last three (03) 3
years 1
6. 5
Project(s) delivered to government
Public Sector Experience 3
organizations over last three (03) years
1
7. 5
Education Sector Project(s) completed at education
3
Experience institutions over last three (03) years
1

5
8.
Past Project(s) with activities spanning
Country-wide Scope 3
over different cities across the country

9. History of Non-Performing 5
Non-performance of contracts (if any)
during last 3 years.
Contracts 0

Section – III: Manufacturer’s/ Product’s Strengths 20


10
. Manufacturer’s Global Countries having supplied the same
5
Presence Quoted item

11
. Production Capacity Monthly capacity to produce similar item 5

12
. Products’ Portfolio Number of Models and/ or Products
5
produced by manufacturer
13
. National & International Number of national and international
5
Patents patents on manufacturer’s credit

Section – IV: Presentation on Project Proposal 30


14 Project Management Overall approach towards planning and
. Approach 10
implementing the project.
15 Overall approach towards after-sale
. Post-Delivery Services support and services.
10

16 Distinguishing features of the quoted


. Distinguishing Features Product and/ or overall project 10
proposed.
Grand Total 100
Bids shall be evaluated on both Eligibility and Technical Qualific
Technical Evaluation the Eligibility Criteria and able to secure 70 points in Technical qu
Technically Qualified Bidders for the next step, i.e. Opening of Fin

Project Director (PMEWC) : ________________________


O, Islamabad

Criteria Value Scoring

15+ years
11 – 15 years
5 – 10 years
10+ offices/ service centers
5 – 10 offices/ service centers 1
< 5 officers/ service centers 2
100+ employees with at least
20% Technical staff
20
50 – 100 employees with at least
20% Technical staff 3
Minimum Rs. 750 million
Rs. 500 million
Rs. 250 million

10+ Projects
5 – 10 Projects 29
< 5 Projects 5
8+ Projects
5 – 8 Projects 29
< 5 Projects 5
5+ Projects
3 – 5 Projects 9
< 3 Project 5
2 Projects activities spanning
over at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over 2
at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over
at least 10 cities 5
No non-performance contracts
0
At least 1 non-performance
contract 0

No. of countries supplied by Bid


in consideration/ Max. No. of 10
countries in all Bids * 5 5
Monthly capacity by Bid in
consideration/ Max. capacity 4166
referred in all Bids * 5 5
No. of models produced by Bid in
consideration/ Max. No. of
models in all Bids * 5 5
No. of Patents possessed by Bid
in consideration/ Max. No. of
Patents in all Bids * 5 0

To be assigned by the Technical


10
Committee 10
To be assigned by the Technical
10 10
Committee

To be assigned by the Technical


0
Committee
0

Technical Qualification Criteria. Bidders meeting


nts in Technical qualification shall be declared as
i.e. Opening of Financial Bid.

Evaluator Name: ________________________________

Signature : ____________________________________
Vender 4 : STARMED, Islamabad
QUALIFICATION

S. # Attribute Description Max. Score

Section – I: General Corporate Profile 25


1. 7
Company in Operation since
Market Presence 4
Registration
2
2. 8
Number of offices/ services centers 5
Bidder’s Footprints
across the country
2
3.
3
Human Resource Strength Number of full-time employees
1
4. 7
Annual Turnover averaged over last 3
Financial Standing 4
years
2
Section – II: Business Profile 25
5. Project(s) of similar value and 5
Relevant Experience complexity completed in last three (03) 3
years 1
6. 5
Project(s) delivered to government
Public Sector Experience 3
organizations over last three (03) years
1
7. 5
Education Sector Project(s) completed at education
3
Experience institutions over last three (03) years
1

5
8.
Past Project(s) with activities spanning
Country-wide Scope 3
over different cities across the country

9. History of Non-Performing 5
Non-performance of contracts (if any)
during last 3 years.
Contracts 0

Section – III: Manufacturer’s/ Product’s Strengths 20


10
. Manufacturer’s Global Countries having supplied the same
5
Presence Quoted item

11
. Production Capacity Monthly capacity to produce similar item 5

12
. Products’ Portfolio Number of Models and/ or Products
5
produced by manufacturer
13
. National & International Number of national and international
5
Patents patents on manufacturer’s credit

Section – IV: Presentation on Project Proposal 30


14 Project Management Overall approach towards planning and
. Approach 10
implementing the project.
15 Overall approach towards after-sale
. Post-Delivery Services support and services.
10

16 Distinguishing features of the quoted


. Distinguishing Features Product and/ or overall project 10
proposed.
Grand Total 100
Bids shall be evaluated on both Eligibility and Technical Qualific
Technical Evaluation the Eligibility Criteria and able to secure 70 points in Technical qu
Technically Qualified Bidders for the next step, i.e. Opening of Fin

Project Director (PMEWC) : ________________________


ED, Islamabad

Criteria Value Scoring

15+ years
11 – 15 years 12
5 – 10 years 4
10+ offices/ service centers
5 – 10 offices/ service centers 4
< 5 officers/ service centers 2
100+ employees with at least
20% Technical staff
23
50 – 100 employees with at least
20% Technical staff 1
Minimum Rs. 750 million
Rs. 500 million
Rs. 250 million 0

10+ Projects
5 – 10 Projects
< 5 Projects
8+ Projects
5 – 8 Projects
< 5 Projects
5+ Projects
3 – 5 Projects
< 3 Project
2 Projects activities spanning
over at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over
at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over
at least 10 cities

No non-performance contracts

At least 1 non-performance
contract

No. of countries supplied by Bid


in consideration/ Max. No. of
countries in all Bids * 5
Monthly capacity by Bid in
consideration/ Max. capacity
referred in all Bids * 5
No. of models produced by Bid in
consideration/ Max. No. of
models in all Bids * 5
No. of Patents possessed by Bid
in consideration/ Max. No. of
Patents in all Bids * 5

To be assigned by the Technical


3
Committee 3
To be assigned by the Technical
10 10
Committee

To be assigned by the Technical


0
Committee
0

Technical Qualification Criteria. Bidders meeting


nts in Technical qualification shall be declared as
i.e. Opening of Financial Bid.

Evaluator Name: ________________________________

Signature : ____________________________________
Vender 5 : MEGA PLUS, Islamabad
QUALIFICATION

S. # Attribute Description Max. Score

Section – I: General Corporate Profile 25


1. 7
Company in Operation since
Market Presence 4
Registration
2
2. 8
Number of offices/ services centers 5
Bidder’s Footprints
across the country
2
3.
3
Human Resource Strength Number of full-time employees
1
4. 7
Annual Turnover averaged over last 3
Financial Standing 4
years
2
Section – II: Business Profile 25
5. Project(s) of similar value and 5
Relevant Experience complexity completed in last three (03) 3
years 1
6. 5
Project(s) delivered to government
Public Sector Experience 3
organizations over last three (03) years
1
7. 5
Education Sector Project(s) completed at education
3
Experience institutions over last three (03) years
1

5
8.
Past Project(s) with activities spanning
Country-wide Scope 3
over different cities across the country

9. History of Non-Performing 5
Non-performance of contracts (if any)
during last 3 years.
Contracts 0

Section – III: Manufacturer’s/ Product’s Strengths 20


10
. Manufacturer’s Global Countries having supplied the same
5
Presence Quoted item

11
. Production Capacity Monthly capacity to produce similar item 5

12
. Products’ Portfolio Number of Models and/ or Products
5
produced by manufacturer
13
. National & International Number of national and international
5
Patents patents on manufacturer’s credit

Section – IV: Presentation on Project Proposal 30


14 Project Management Overall approach towards planning and
. Approach 10
implementing the project.
15 Overall approach towards after-sale
. Post-Delivery Services support and services.
10

16 Distinguishing features of the quoted


. Distinguishing Features Product and/ or overall project 10
proposed.
Grand Total 100
Bids shall be evaluated on both Eligibility and Technical Qualific
Technical Evaluation the Eligibility Criteria and able to secure 70 points in Technical qu
Technically Qualified Bidders for the next step, i.e. Opening of Fin

Project Director (PMEWC) : ________________________


LUS, Islamabad

Criteria Value Scoring

15+ years
11 – 15 years 2(17) 0(7)
5 – 10 years
10+ offices/ service centers
5 – 10 offices/ service centers 1(4) 2
< 5 officers/ service centers
100+ employees with at least
20% Technical staff
10(250) 3
50 – 100 employees with at least
20% Technical staff
Minimum Rs. 750 million
Rs. 500 million
Rs. 250 million

10+ Projects
5 – 10 Projects 3
< 5 Projects 1
8+ Projects
5 – 8 Projects 3
< 5 Projects 1
5+ Projects
3 – 5 Projects 3
< 3 Project 1
2 Projects activities spanning
over at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over 3
at least 20 cities
1 Project activities spanning over
at least 10 cities 5
No non-performance contracts
0
At least 1 non-performance
contract 5

No. of countries supplied by Bid


in consideration/ Max. No. of 25
countries in all Bids * 5 5
Monthly capacity by Bid in
consideration/ Max. capacity 0
referred in all Bids * 5 0
No. of models produced by Bid in
consideration/ Max. No. of
models in all Bids * 5
No. of Patents possessed by Bid
in consideration/ Max. No. of
Patents in all Bids * 5

To be assigned by the Technical


10
Committee 10
To be assigned by the Technical
10 10
Committee

To be assigned by the Technical


0
Committee
0

Technical Qualification Criteria. Bidders meeting


nts in Technical qualification shall be declared as
i.e. Opening of Financial Bid.

Evaluator Name: ________________________________

Signature : ____________________________________

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy