05 N017 2931
05 N017 2931
DISSERTATION PROPOSAL
Submitted By:
Mr,. BHAVANI SINGH
M.Sc., (Nursing), 1st year
1
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, KARNATAKA
BANGALORE, KARNATAKA
ANNEXURE – II
SYNOPSIS PROFORMA FOR REGISTRATION OF SUBJECTS FOR
DISSERTATION
1 NAME OF THE CANDIDATE Mr. BHAWANI SINGH
AND ADDRESS (IN BLOCK 1st YEAR M.Sc., NURSING
LETTERS BAPUJI COLLEGE OF NURSING
DAVANGERE
2 NAME OF THE INSTITUTION BAPUJI COLLEGE OF NURSING
DAVANGERE – 577 004, KARNATAKA
2
Good health depends in a part on a safe environment. Clients in all health
settings are at risk for acquiring infections because of lower resistance to infectious
micro-organisms, increased exposure to numbers and types of disease causing micro-
organisms and invasive procedures.1
Nosocomial infection result from delivery of health services in a health care
facility.1
Nosocomial infections are infections which are a result of treatment in a hospital
or a health care service unit, but secondary to the patient’s original condition. Infections
are considered nosocomial if they first appear 48 hours or more after hospital admission
or within 30 days after discharge.2
Most of the causative organisms are present in the external environment of the
patient and are introduced into the body through direct contact or through contaminated
materials.3
In the United States, it has been estimated that as many as o e hospital patient in
ten acquires a nosocomial infection or 2 million patients a year. Estimates of the annual
cost range from $4.5 billion to $11 billion and up.2
In many instances nosocomial infections could be prevented by strict aseptic
technique and by a reduction in the use of invasive procedures and antibiotics.3
3
patient with a clean and safe environment. The conscientiousness and accuracy of
the nurse in performing clean and aseptic procedures increases the effectiveness of
infection control.
Reported occurrence of nosocomial infections in United States range from 3% to
15.5% of hospital discharges, depending on the type of hospital, type of patients. On
the average, 5% to 7% of people who are admitted to general hospital acquire a
nosocomial infection.7
Nosocomial infections contributed to 88,000 deaths in the United States in 1995.
One third of nosocomial infections are considered preventable. Ms. Magazine
reports that as many as 90% of the deaths from hospital infections could be
prevented.2
A study was conducted by P. Mathur A. Kapil and B. Das on nosocomial
bacteraemia, intensive care unit patients of a tertiary care centre. The study was
conducted from July to December, 2001 in the ICUs of a tertiary care centre in
Northern India. The records of all the patients who had one or more episodes of
nosocomial bacteraemia during the study period were reviewed to identify the
pathogens causing bacteraemia and their antimicrobial sensitivities. A total of 152
episodes of nosocomial bacteraemia occurred in 140 patients. A high prevalence of
antimicrobial resistance in isolates causing bacteraemia in these critical care wards
warrants implementation of strict antibiotic prescribing policies and hospital
infection control guidelines.
A recent study showed how serious nosocomial pneumonia is the researchers
examined threetypes of nosocomial infection; pneumonia, infected surgical wounds
and UTIs of the patients who died because of their infections, more than 79% had
nosocomial pneumonia.9
This initiated the researcher to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching
programme on knowledge regarding nosocomial infections among staff nurses of
Bapuji Hospital, Davangere.
4
and in depth of information from previous studies.
a) Pitt-Gomez C, Molina-Quilis R, Ruiz-Bremon A, depedro-Cuesta J (1995)
A descriptive study of nursing practices in nosocomial infection control in
Spain was conducted. During the period 1990-1991, a questionnaire, adapted
from that used in the study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection control was
mailed to all Spanish General Hospitals, public and private, having more than
400 beds, and to all those in the public health sector having more than 100 beds.
Nursing related information was selected for analysis from each of three sections;
staff, surveillance system and programmes. The response rate was 70%. Most
procedures proving nosocomial infection control efficient had been implemented
in 70-80% of responding hospitals. Teaching was most qualified and intensive in
medium sized hospitals.10
5
international recommendations. The program was updated regularly according to
infection and colonization rates and reports in the literature.12
In a 5 years following implementation of the infection control programme
there was a significant decline in the rate of nosocomial infections.
6
(n=50) and ward aides (n=50) were included. A questionnaire was administered.
A scoring system was devised (KAP score). They were further subjected to a
series of similar questionnaires at different intervals after an education module.
Statistical analysis was done using statistical software. Total compliance was
63% and ward aides were most compliant 76.7%. The study concluded that
education has a positive impact on retention of knowledge, attitudes and
practices in all the categories of staff. There is a need to develop a system of
continuous education for all categories of staff in order to reduce the nosocomial
infections.15
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:
“A study to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching program on knowledge
regarding nosocomial infection among staff nurses of Bapuji Hospital, Davangere.
7
4) To find the difference between pre-test and post-test knowledge score.
5) To determine the association between pre-test knowledge score and selected
demographic variables.
6.5 HYPOTHESIS:
The mean post test scores of subject exposed to structured teaching programme
will be greater than their mean pre test scores as measured by structured
questionnaire at 0.05 level of significance.
6.6 ASSUMPTIONS:
1) Staff nurses may not have complete knowledge regarding nosocomial infection.
2) Structured teaching programme will significantly increase the knowledge level of
staff nurses.
6.7 DELIMITATIONS:
8
1) The study is limited to staff nurses of Bapuji Hospital.
EXCLUSIVE CRITERIA:
1) Staff nurses who are not willing to participate in the study.
9
VARIABLES:
Independent variable: Structured teaching programme
Dependent variants: Knowledge regarding nosocomial infection among staff nurses.
10
4) Barbara Kozier, Glenora Erb, Andrey Berman, Karen Burke. “Fundamentals of
Nursing”. 7th edition, Pearson Education Publishers, Singapore, pp 669.
5) Basavantappa B.T. “Fundamentals of Nursing”. 1 st edition, Jaypee Brothers
Publishers, New Delhi, pp 140.
6) Grace Cole. “Basic Nursing Skills and Concepts”. Mosby Year Book
Publishers, Missouri, pp 2040
7) Deanna E. Grimes. “Infectious Diseases”. Mosby Year Book Publishers,
Missouri, pp 275-280.
8) Mathur P, Kapil A and Das B. “Nosocomial bacteraemia in intensive care unit
patients of tertiary care centre”. Indian J Med Res 122, October 2005, pp 305-308.
9) Carol Calianno. “Nosocomial Pneumonia”. Nursing 96 May, pp 34-39.
10) Pliff-Gomez C, Molina-Quilis R, Ruiz-Bremon A, dePedro-Cuesta J. “Nursing
in nosocomial infection control in Spain”. J Adv Nurs 1995 March; 21 (3): 440-6.
11) Pittet D,Hugonnet S, Harbarth S et al. “Effectiveness of hospital-wide
programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control
programme. Lancet, 2000 Oct 14; 356 (9238): 1307-12.
12) Benoit Misset, Jean-Francois Timsit et al. “A continuous quality improvement
program reduces nosocomial infection rates in the ICU”. Intensive care medicine,
Springer Berlin Publishers, March 2004; 30 (3): pp 395-400.
13) Rabin Saba, Dilara Iran et al. “Hand hygiene compliance in a hematology
Unit”. Acta Haematologica 2005; 113: 190-193 (DOI: 10.1159/000084449).
14) Christiaens G, Barbier C et al. “Hand hygiene: first measure to control
nosocomial infection”. Rev Med Liege 2006 Jan; 61 (1): 31-61.
11
9. Signature of the Candidate
12
11.1Signature
11.3Signature
11.5Signature
12 12.1 Remarks of the Principal
12.2 Signature
13