Understanding The Balance Sheet
Understanding The Balance Sheet
The balance sheet has several purposes including telling you the assets a company
has to protect shareholders, how efficiently management is using capital, the risk of
bankruptcy, and how fast a business can grow. This table of contents has been put
together to make it easy for you to navigate Investing Lesson 3: How to Understand a
Balance Sheet. Whether you are researching a stock or running your own small
business, the balance sheet has never been easier to understand for new investors.
The table of contents below can help you navigate effortlessly - we've kept each
balance sheet topic on its own page to make learning even easier. Grab a cup of
coffee, and start reading through these pages. Please note, these lessons have been
designed to be read sequentially! You should start at the beginning and work your way
through, page by page, to learn the most.
Introduction
Purposes of the Balance Sheet
How many times have you flipped to the back of a company's annual report and found
yourself blankly staring at the pages of numbers and tables? You know that these
should be important to your investing decision, but you're not quite sure what they
mean or where to begin.
In this investing lesson, we're going to take our first major step towards changing that
by teaching you about the balance sheet. Smart investors have always known that
financial statements are the keys to every company. They can warn of potential
problems, and when used correctly, help determine what a business is really "worth".
An investor who understands financial statements will never have to ask "is this
company a good investment?".
In this lesson, we are going to learn to analyze a balance sheet. There are two
segments. In the first, we will go through a typical balance sheet and explain what each
of the items means. In the second, we will actually look at the balance sheets of several
American corporations and perform basic financial calculations on them.
1.) The Annual Report: The annual report is a document released by companies at the
end of their fiscal year which includes almost everything an investor needs to know
about the business. It generally contains pictures of facilities, branch offices,
employees, and products, all of which are completely unimportant to making your
investing decision. They are normally followed by a letter from the CEO and other
senior management which discusses the past as well as upcoming year. Tucked away
in the back of most annual reports is a collection of financial documents. Most of the
time you can go onto a company's website and find the Investor Relations link. From
there, you should be able to either download the annual report in PDF form or find
information on how to contact shareholder services and request a copy in the mail.
2.) The 10K: This is a document filed with the SEC which contains a detailed
explanation of a business. It is reported annually and contains the same financial
statements the annual report does, in a more detailed form. The benefit of the 10K is
that it allows you to find out additional information such as the amount of stock options
awarded to executives at the company, as well as a more in-depth discussion of the
nature of the business and marketplace. Sometimes you will find that a company has
no financial statements in the 10K, but instead has written, "incorporated herein by
reference" This means that the financial statements can be found elsewhere, such as in
the annual report or another publication. Even if this is the case, it is still worth it to get
a copy. You can find this by contacting the company, visiting their website, or going to
FreeEdgar (freeedgar.com) or SEC.gov.
3.) The 10Q: The is similar to the 10K, but is filed quarterly (four times a year - normally
the end of January, June, September, and December). If the company is planning on
changing its dividend policy, or something equally as important, they may bury it in the
10Q. These documents are critical and can be obtained in the same way as the annual
report and 10K.
You will want to get a copy of all three documents for the past year or two from the
company you are interested in investing in. Most of them can be found at
http://finance.yahoo.com - type in the ticker symbol of the company you want to
research and then click the "financials" link. This will bring up a copy of the latest
quarterly financial statements. (For all good purposes, I would recommend you first
analyze the annual balance sheet, which can be found by clicking "annual data" in the
upper right hand corner.) As always, it is best to get the information directly from the
company.
Before you can analyze a balance sheet, you have to know how it is set-up.
Every balance sheet must "balance". The total value of all assets must be equal to the
combined value of the all liabilities and shareholder equity (i.e., if a lemonade stand
had $10 in assets and $3 in liabilities, the shareholder equity would be $7. The assets
are $10, the liabilities + shareholder equity = $10 [$3 + $7]).
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable $9,300,000,000 $4,483,000,000
Short Term Debt $21,000,000 $5,373,000,000
Total Current Liabilities $9,321,000,000 $9,856,000,000
Long-Term Liabilities
Long-Term Debt $835,000,000 $854,000,000
Other Liabilities $1,004,000,000 $902,000,000
Deferred Long Term Liability Charges $358,000,000 $498,000,000
Total Liabilities $11,518,000,000 $12,110,000,000
Shareholders' Equity
Common Stock $870,000,000 $867,000,000
Retained Earnings $21,265,000,000 $20,773,000,000
Treasury Stock ($13,293,000,000) ($13,160,000,000)
Capital Surplus $3,196,000,000 $2,584,000,000
Other Stockholder Equity ($2,722,000,000) ($1,551,000,000)
Total Stockholder Equity $9,316,000,000 $9,513,000,000
There are some cases where cash on the balance sheet isn't necessarily a good thing.
If a company is not able to generate enough profits internally, they may turn to a bank
and borrow money. The money sitting on the balance sheet as cash may actually be
borrowed money. To find out, you are going to have to look at the amount of debt a
company has (we will be discussing this later on in the lesson). The moral: You
probably won't be able to tell if a company is weak based on cash alone; the amount of
debt is far more important.
From time to time, companies become known for their legendary cash hoards. A
decade ago, Microsoft was known for its $5.25 billion in cash and $32.973 billion in
short term investments. Berkshire Hathaway has kept as much as $40+ billion in cash
on hand.
Accounts Receivables
Accounts Receivable as a Balance Sheet Asset
Receivables are also sometimes known as accounts receivables and represents
money that is owed to a company by its customers.
The $2.5 million would go on Warner Brother's balance sheet as accounts receivables.
Receivable Turns
The receivable turns or receivable turnover is a great financial ratio to learn when you
are analyzing a business or a stock because common sense tells you the faster a
company collects its accounts receivables, the better. The sooner customers pay their
bills, the sooner a company can put the cash in the bank, pay down debt, or start
making new products. There is also a smaller chance of losing money to delinquent
accounts. Fortunately, there is a way to calculate the number of days it takes for a
business to collect its receivables. The formula looks like this:
Let's look at an example. I've built a table at the bottom of this page that will provide
you with the numbers you need for a fictional company, H.F. Beverages.
In 2009, H.F. Beverages reported credit sales of $15,608,300. If we look at the excerpt
from its balance sheet (above), we will see that in 2009, it had $1,183,363 in
receivables and in 2008, $1,178,423. We need to find out the average amount of
receivables H.F. had in 2009, so we would take $1,1873,363 + $1,178,423 and divide it
by 2. The answer is $1,180,893.
The answer, called receivable turns by financial analysts and professional investors, is
13.2173. This means that H.F. Beverages collects its accounts receivable 13.2173
times per year. Once you calculate this number, finding out the number of days it takes
for customers to pay their bills is simple. Since there are 365 days in a year and the
company gets 13.2173 turns per year, take 365 ÷ 13.2173. The answer is the number
of days it takes the average customer to pay (in H.F.'s case, we come up with 27.61).
This means the company is doing a good job managing its accounts receivable
because customers aren't exceeding the 30 day policy. Had the answer been greater
than 30, you would have been wise to try to find out why there were so many late
payments, which could be a sign of trouble. (Keep in mind you will need to read
through the company's reports to find out what its collection deadline is. Not all
companies require their customers to pay within 30 days).
To come up with a balance sheet amount, companies must estimate the value of their
inventory. For instance, if Nintendo had 5,000 units of its new video game system, the
Game Cube, sitting in a warehouse in Japan, and expected to sell them to retailers for
$300 each, they would be able to put $1,500,000 on their balance sheet as the value of
their current inventory (5,000 units x $300 each = $1.5 million).
Inventory Spoilage
Another inventory risk is spoilage. Spoilage occurs when a product actually goes bad.
This is a serious concern for companies that make or sell perishable goods. If a grocery
store owner overstocks on ice cream, and two months later, half of the ice cream has
gone bad because it has not been purchased, the grocer has no choice but to throw it
out. The estimated value of the spoiled ice cream must be taken off the grocery store's
balance sheet.
The moral of the story: the faster a company sells its inventory, the smaller the risk of
value loss.
Finding out how fast a company turns its inventory is simple. Here's the formula.
The answer is the number of inventory turns - in Coca-Cola's case, 5.7927. What this
means is that Coca Cola sells all of its inventory 5.79 times each year. Is this good? To
answer this question, you must find out the average turn of Coke's competitors and
compare. If you do the research, you find out that the average turnover of a company in
Coke's industry is 8.4. Why is Coca-Cola's turn rate lower? Should it affect your
investing decision? The only way you can answer these kinds of questions is if you
truly understand the business you are analyzing. This is why it is important that you
read the entire annual report, 10K and 10Q of the companies you have taken an
interest in. Although Coke's turn rate is lower, further analysis of the balance sheet will
reveal that it is 4 to 5x financially stronger than its industry averages. With such
outstanding economics, you probably don't need to worry about inventory losing value.
Use the inventory turn formula (cost of goods sold divided by the average inventory
values) to come up with the number of inventory turns for each business. Between
1999 and 2000, McDonald's had an inventory turn rate of 96.1549, incredible for even a
high-turn industry such as fast food. This means that every 3.79 days, McDonald's
goes through its entire inventory. Wendy's, on the other hand, has a turn rate of 40.073
and clears its inventory every 9.10 days.
This difference in efficiency can make a tremendous impact on the bottom line. By tying
up as little capital as possible in inventory, McDonald's can use the cash on hand to
open more stores, increase its advertising budget, or buy back shares. It eases the
strain on cash flow considerably, allowing management much more flexibility in
planning for the long term.
Wendy's
2000 1999
Inventory on Balance Sheet $40,086,000 $40,271,000
Cost of Goods Sold on Income Statement $1,610,075,000
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
In the course of every day operations, businesses will have to pay for goods or services
before they actually receive the product. If a jewelry store moved into your
neighborhood mall, it would most likely have to sign a rent agreement and pay six to
twelve months' rent in advance. If the monthly rent was $1,000 and the business
prepaid for an entire year, they would put $12,000 on the balance sheet under Prepaid
Expenses ($1,000 monthly rent x 12 months = $12,000). Each month, they would
deduct 1/12 from the prepaid expenses until the end of the year, at which point, the
amount would be $0.
Sometimes companies decide to prepay taxes, salaries, utility bills, rent, or the interest
on their debt. These would all be pooled together and put on the balance sheet under
this heading.
By their very nature, Prepaid Expenses are a small part of the balance sheet. They are
relatively unimportant in your analysis and shouldn't be given too much attention.
Notes Receivable
Notes Receivable are debts owed to the company which are payable within one year.
I would recommend you get a copy of Barron's "Dictionary of Finance and Investing
Terms". They are relatively inexpensive ($10 or $11), and define over 4,000 terms. This
can be a huge asset regardless of the financial statement you are looking at. You may
also find the "Dictionary of Business Terms" useful as well. It has 7,500 entries covering
almost every business definition you could possibly ask for. While neither is required to
do balance sheet analysis, they can be a big help.
Current Liabilities
Current liabilities are the debts a company owes which must be paid within one year.
They are the opposite of current assets. Current liabilities includes things such as short
term loans, accounts payable, dividends and interest payable, bonds payable,
consumer deposits, and reserves for Federal taxes.
Let's take a look at some of the most common and important current liabilities on the
balance sheet.
So how can you ever hope to tell if a company is wisely borrowing money (such as our
department store), or recklessly going into debt? Look at the amount of notes payable
on the balance sheet (if they aren't classified under 'notes payable', combine the
company's short term obligations and long term current debt). If the amount of cash
and cash equivalents is much larger than the notes payable, you shouldn't have any
reason to be concerned.
If, on the other hand, the notes payable has a higher value than the cash, short term
investments, and accounts receivable combined, you should be seriously concerned.
Unless the company operates in a business where inventory can quickly be turned into
cash, this is a serious sign of financial weakness.
If you are looking at the balance sheet of a bank, you will want to pay close attention to
an entry under the current liabilities called "Consumer Deposits". Often, they will be will
lumped under other current liabilities. This is the amount that customers have
deposited in the bank. Since, theoretically, all of the account holders could withdrawal
all of their funds at the same time, the bank must list the deposits as a current liability.
Working Capital
The number one reason most people look at a balance sheet is to find out a company's
working capital (or "current") position. It reveals more about the financial condition of a
business than almost any other calculation. It tells you what would be left if a company
raised all of its short term resources, and used them to pay off its short term liabilities.
The more working capital, the less financial strain a company experiences. By studying
a company's position, you can clearly see if it has the resources necessary to expand
internally or if it will have to turn to a bank and take on debt.
One of the main advantages of looking at the working capital position is being able to
foresee any financial difficulties that may arise. Even a business that has billions of
dollars in fixed assets will quickly find itself in bankruptcy court if it can't pay its monthly
bills. Under the best circumstances, poor working capital leads to financial pressure on
a company, increased borrowing, and late payments to creditor - all of which result in a
lower credit rating. A lower credit rating means banks charge a higher interest rate,
which can cost a corporation a lot of money over time.
Negative Working Capital Can Be a Good Thing for High Turn Businesses
Companies that have high inventory turns and do business on a cash basis (such as a
grocery store) need very little working capital. These types of businesses raise money
every time they open their doors, then turn around and plow that money back into
inventory to increase sales. Since cash is generated so quickly, managements can
simply stockpile the proceeds from their daily sales for a short period of time if a
financial crisis arises. Since cash can be raised so quickly, there is no need to have a
large amount of working capital available.
A company that makes heavy machinery is a completely different story. Because these
types of businesses are selling expensive items on a long-term payment basis, they
can't raise cash as quickly. Since the inventory on their balance sheet is normally
ordered months in advance, it can rarely be sold fast enough to raise money for short-
term financial crises (by the time it is sold, it may be too late). It's easy to see why
companies such as this must keep enough working capital on hand to get through any
unforeseen difficulties.
For the past ten or twenty years, it has been incredibly rare for a company to trade that
low. You can still use the basic concept to your advantage; if you can find a business
that is trading for working capital plus half the value of the fixed assets, you would be
paying $0.50 for every $1.00 of assets.
An acceptable current ratio varies by industry. Generally speaking, the more liquid the
current assets, the smaller the current ratio can be without cause for concern. For most
industrial companies, 1.5 is an acceptable current ratio. As the number approaches or
falls below 1 (which means the company has a negative working capital), you will need
to take a close look at the business and make sure there are no liquidity issues.
Companies that have ratios around or below 1 should only be those which have
inventories that can immediately be converted into cash. If this is not the case and a
company's number is low, you should be seriously concerned.
Inefficiency
If you're analyzing a balance sheet and find a company has a current ratio of 3 or 4,
you may want to be concerned. A number this high means that management has so
much cash on hand, they may be doing a poor job of investing it. This is one of the
reasons it is important to read the annual report, 10K and 10Q of a company. Most of
the time, the executives will discuss their plans in these reports. If you notice a large
pile of cash building up and the debt has not increased at the same rate (meaning the
money is not borrowed), you may want to try to find out what is going on.
Although not ideal, too much cash on hand is the kind of problem a smart investor
prays for.
What does this tell you? It is a reflection of the liquidity of a business. The Quick Test
ratio does not apply to the handful of companies where inventory is almost immediately
convertible into cash (such as McDonalds, Wal-Mart, etc.) Instead, it measures the
ability of the average company to come up with cold, hard cash literally in a matter of
hours or days. Since inventory is rarely sold that fast in most businesses, it is excluded.
The difference between short term and long term investments lie in the company's
motive for owning them. Short term investments consist of stocks, bonds, etc. a
company has bought and will sell shortly. The investments made under long term
investments may never be sold. An excellent example would be Berkshire Hathaway's
relationship with Coca-Cola. Berkshire owns 200 million shares of the soft-drink giant,
and will most likely continue to hold them forever, regardless of the price they are
selling for in the open market.
Depending on the type of business, these may or may not make up a large percentage
of the total assets. Most of the assets of a railroad or airline will fall into this category
(these companies must continue to buy railroad cars and planes to survive - both of
which are fixed assets). An advertising agency on the other hand, will have far fewer
fixed assets. They require nothing but their employees, some pencils, and a few
computers.
You must be careful not to pay too much attention to this number. Since companies are
often unable to sell their fixed assets within any reasonable amount of time (who would
be willing to buy three notebook binders, a factory, the broom in the broom closet, etc.
at a moment's notice?) they are carried on the balance sheet at cost regardless of their
actual value. It is possible for companies to grossly inflate this number (which is called
"watering" the stock), or to write the values down to nothing (some companies have $1
million dollar buildings carried for $1 on the balance sheet).
When analyzing a balance sheet, you will want to look at this number with a raised
eyebrow. Don't completely ignore it (that would be foolish), but certainly don't take it too
seriously.
Intangible Assets
Companies often own things of value that cannot be touched, felt, or seen. These
consist of patents, trademarks, brand names, franchises, and economic goodwill (which
is different than the accounting goodwill we've discussed. Economic goodwill consists
of the intangible advantages a company has over its competitors such as an excellent
reputation, strategic location, business connections, etc.) While every effort should be
made for businesses to carry them at costs on the balance sheet, they are normally
given completely meaningless values.
To prove the point that the intangible value assigned on the balance sheet can be
deceptive, here's an excerpt from Michael F. Price's introduction to Benjamin Graham's
"The Interpretation of Financial Statements" ...
In the spring of 1975, shortly after I began my career at Mutual Shares Fund, Max
Heine asked me to look at a small brewery - the F&M Schaefer Brewing Company. I'll
never forget looking at the balance sheet and seeing a +/- $40 million net worth and
$40 million in 'intangibles'. I said to Max, 'It looks cheap. It's trading for well below its
net worth.... A classic value stock!' Max said, 'Look closer.'
I looked in the notes and at the financial statements, but they didn't reveal where the
intangibles figure came from. I called Schaefer's treasurer and said, 'I'm looking at your
balance sheet. Tell me, what does the $40 million of intangibles related to?' He replied,
'Don't you know our jingle, 'Schaefer is the one beer to have when you're having more
than one.'?'
That was my first analysis of an intangible asset which, of course, was way overstated,
increased book value, and showed higher earnings than were warranted in 1975. All
this to keep Schaefer's stock price higher than it otherwise would have been. We didn't
buy it."
When analyzing a balance sheet, you should generally ignore the amount assigned to
intangible assets. These intangible assets may be worth a huge amount in real life
(Coca-Cola's brand name is priceless), but it is the income statement, not the balance
sheet, that gives investors insight into the value of these intangible items.
For decades, when a company bought another company, it could use one of two
accounting methods: pooling of interest or purchase. When the pooling of interest
method is used, the balance sheets of the two businesses are combined and no
goodwill is created. When the purchase method is used, the acquiring company will put
the premium they paid for the other company on their balance sheet under the
"Goodwill" category. Accounting rules require the goodwill be amortized over the course
of 40 years.
McDonald's
Earnings: $1,977,300,000
Shares Outstanding: 1.29 Billion
(You don't need McDonald's other information for this example)
Wendy's
Book Value: $1,082,424,000
Book Value per Share: $10.3482
Shares Outstanding: 104.6 Million
Earnings: $169,648,000
Say McDonald's decided to buy all of Wendy's stock using the purchase method.
Wendy's has a book value of $10.3482 per share, yet is trading at $32 per share. If
McDonald's were to pay the current market price, they would spend a total of
$3,347,200,000 (104.6 million shares x $36 per share). To keep this example simple,
we are going to assume the shareholders of Wendy's approved the merger for cash.
McDonald's would mail a check to the Wendy's shareholders, paying them $32 for each
share they owned.
Since the book value of Wendy's is only $1,082,424,000, and McDonald's paid
$3,347,200,000, McDonald's paid a premium of $2,264,776,000. This is going to go
onto their balance sheet as Goodwill. It is required to be amortized against earnings for
up to 40 years. This means that each year, 1/40 of the goodwill amount must be
subtracted from McDonald's earnings so that by the 40th year, there is no goodwill left
on the balance sheet.
Now that McDonald's and Wendy's are one company, their earnings will be combined.
Assuming next year's results were identical, the company would earn $2,146,948,000,
or $1.66 per share1. Remember that goodwill must be amortized, meaning 1/40 the
amount must be deducted from next year's earnings. McDonald's must deduct
$56,619,400 from earnings next year as a charge against goodwill2. Now, McDonald's
can only report earnings of $2,090,328,600, or $1.62 per share (compared to the $1.66
they would have been able to report before the goodwill charge). Goodwill reduced
earnings by 4¢ per share.
If the pooling of interest method had been used, no goodwill would have been created,
and McDonald's would have reported EPS (earnings per share) of $1.66. Meaning that
depending on how the accounting was handled, the exact same transaction could have
two vastly different impacts on earnings per share.
Pay careful attention to the mergers a company has made in the past few years. Once
you are able to value a business, you will want to look at recent acquisitions to
determine if they were too expensive. If you find this to be the case, you will probably
want to avoid the stock (why would you want to invest in a company that was throwing
your money around?).
These charges are intangible and should be given very little weight when analyzing a
balance sheet.
Long Term Debt and the Debt to Equity Ratio on the Balance
Sheet
The amount of long term debt on a company's balance sheet is crucial. It refers to
money the company owes that it doesn't expect to pay off in the next year. Long term
debt consists of things such as mortgages on corporate buildings and / or land, as well
as business loans.
A great sign of prosperity is when a balance sheet shows the amount of long term debt
has been decreasing for one or more years. When debt shrinks and cash increases,
the balance sheet is said to be "improving". When it's the other way around, it is said to
be "deteriorating". Companies with too much long term debt will find themselves
overwhelmed with interest payments, a risk of having too little working capital, and
ultimately, bankruptcy. Thankfully, there is a financial tool that can tell you if a business
has borrowed too much money.
The result you get after dividing debt by equity is the percentage of the company that is
indebted (or "leveraged"). The normal level of debt to equity has changed over time,
and depends on both economic factors and society's general feeling towards credit.
Generally, any company that has a debt to equity ratio of over 40% to 50% should be
looked at more carefully to make sure there are no liquidity problems. If you find the
company's working capital, and current ratio / quick ratios drastically low, this is is a
sign of serious financial weakness.
Profitable Borrowing
If a business can earn a higher rate of return than the interest rate at which it borrows,
it becomes profitable for the business to borrow money. (An example: If a corporation
earned 15% on its investments and borrowed funds at 8%, it would make 7% on the
borrowed money [15% return - 8% cost of money = 7% net profit]. This boosts what
analysts call "Return on Equity". We will talk about Return on Equity, or ROE, in a
future lesson. It is briefly touched on in the Retained Earnings section of this lesson.)
Other Liabilities
Like the few other "other" parts of the balance sheet, "Other Liabilities" is a catch-all
category where companies can consolidate their miscellaneous debt. You can normally
find an explanation of what makes up these other liabilities somewhere in the financial
reports. Often times, they consist of things such as inter-company borrowings (where
one of a company's divisions or subsidiaries borrows from another), accrued expenses,
sales tax payable (in the instance of retail stores), etc.
Generally, you should take the time to look at the various other liabilities a company
has. Most are self explanatory and are not as important as the other major liabilities
already discussed.
In 1983, Nebraska Furniture Mart was the most successful home furnishings store in
the United States. It's gross annual sales exceeded $88.6 million, and the company
had no debt. At the time, Warren Buffett, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, was
searching for great businesses to acquire. After noticing how successful the furniture
business appeared to be, he approach the owner, Rose Blumpkin, and offered to buy
the company.
Almost immediately, Rose offered to sell 90% of Nebraska Furniture Mart to Berkshire
for $55 million. The next day, Buffett walked into the store and handed her a check.
This made NFM a partially-owned subsidiary of Berkshire. (A subsidiary is a company
controlled by another company through ownership of at least a majority of the voting
stock.) Since subsidiaries are controlled by their parent companies, accounting rules
allow for them to be carried on the parent company's balance sheet 1. When Berkshire
bought its 90% stake in Furniture Mart, it was able to add the assets of the furniture
giant to its own balance sheet.
This presents a problem. Berkshire can now add the assets of Nebraska Furniture Mart
to its balance sheet, but technically, it doesn't own them all. Remember, Rose Blumpkin
only sold 90% of her company - she kept the other 10%. Berkshire will somehow have
to show that some of the assets on its balance sheet belong to Rose, who has a
minority interest in NFM. To do this, it will calculate the value of Rose's stake in the
subsidiary and put it under a liability account called "Minority Interest". These are the
assets Berkshire "owes" Rose. Again, in all reports following 2008 and 2009, this
account will appear in the Shareholder Equity section of the balance sheet and not as a
liability. This is extremely important. The theory behind this shift was that the money
owed to Rose wasn't really a debt of the company, it represents allocation of
ownership.
A company may have several minority partners in many subsidiaries. The minority
interest of all of these partners is added together and placed on the balance sheet.
1.) A company can integrate the balance sheet of its subsidiary if it owns 80% or more. It can report earnings of the subsidiary if it owns 20% or more.
Shareholder Equity
Shareholder Equity is the net worth of a company. It represents the stockholders' claim
to a business' assets after all creditors and debts have been paid. Shareholder equity is
also referred to as Owner's or Stockholders' Equity. It can be calculated by taking the
total assets and subtracting the total liabilities.
Shareholder equity usually comes from two places. The first is cash paid in by investors
when the company sold stock; the second is retained earnings, which are the
accumulated profits a business has held on to and not paid out to its shareholders as
dividends. Because these are the two ways a company generally creates shareholders'
equity, the balance sheet is organized to show each parts' contribution.
Book Value
Book Value and Shareholder Equity are not quite the same thing. To find a company's
book value, you need to take the shareholders' equity and exclude all intangible items.
This leaves you with the theoretical value of all of the company's tangible assets (those
which can be touched, seen, and felt). For this reason, book value is sometimes also
called "Net Tangible Assets".
Why? Let's say your company earns $10 million a year and has $30 million in assets.
My company earns the same $10 million but has $50 million assets. It is generally
understood that a relationship exists between the amount of assets a company has and
the profit it generates for the owners. If you wanted to double the earnings of your
company, you would probably have to invest another $30 million into the company.
After the reinvestment, the business would have $60 million in assets and earn $20
million a year.
On the other hand, if I wanted to double the earnings of my company, I would have to
invest another $50 million into the business (which would double the assets). After the
reinvestment, my business would have $100 million in assets and generate $20 million
a year.
You would have to retain $30 million in earnings to double your profits. I would have to
retain $50 million to get the same profit! That means that you could have paid out the
difference (in this case $20 million) as dividends, reinvested it in the business, paid
down debt, or bought back shares! We will talk more about this in the future.
On most balance sheets, there is a list of such entries. They consist of all of the capital
that has been paid in by shareholders who have purchased either the common stock,
preferred stock, warrants, etc.
Almost always part of the surplus is a result of retained earnings (which would increase
the shareholder equity). There is a specific part of the surplus that comes from other
sources (such as increasing the value of fixed assets carried on the balance sheet, the
sale of stock at a premium, or the lowering of the par value on common stock). These
"other" sources are frequently called "Capital Surplus" and placed on the balance
sheet. In other words, Capital Surplus tells you how much of the company's
shareholder equity is not due to retained earnings.
Treasury Stock
When analyzing a balance sheet, you're apt to run across an entry under Shareholder
Equity called "Treasury Stock". This refers to the shares a company has issued and
somehow reacquired either through share repurchase programs or donations.
Companies sometimes buy back their shares for a variety of reasons. In most cases, it
is a sign management believes the stock is undervalued. Depending upon its
objectives, a company can either retire the shares it purchases, or hold them with the
intention of reselling them to raise cash when the stock price rises.
When a corporation purchases its own stock, the cash on hand is reduced. This lowers
the total shareholder equity. In order for investors to know the reduced cash and equity
was a result of share repurchases and not debt or losses, management puts the cost of
the reacquired stock under "Treasury Stock" in order to clarify. This is why you will often
see a negative number besides the treasury stock entry. (You may be wondering why
the current market price of the company's treasury stock isn't listed as an asset since
the shares can be sold at any time to raise cash. There is a debate about this in the
accounting world. The premise is that all unissued stock can also be sold for cash yet it
isn't listed as an assets - treasury stock should be treated the same way.)
Many states limit the amount of treasury stock a corporation can own at any given time
since it is way of taking resources out of the business by the owners / shareholders,
which in turn, may jeopardize the legal rights of the creditors.
When the executives decide that earnings should be retained, they have to account for
them on the balance sheet under shareholder equity. This allows investors to see how
much money has been put into the business over the years. Once you learn to read the
income statement, you can use the retained earnings figure to make a decision on how
wisely management is deploying and investing the shareholders' money. If you notice a
company is plowing all of its earnings back into itself and isn't experiencing
exceptionally high growth, you can be sure that the stock holders would be better
served if the board of directors declared a dividend.
Ultimately, the goal for any successful management is to create $1 in market value for
every $1 of retained earnings.
The Lear example deserves a closer look. It is immediately apparent that shareholders
would have been better off had the company paid out its earnings as dividends.
Unfortunately, the economics of the company are so bad had the profits been paid out,
the business probably would have gone bankrupt. The earnings are reinvested at a sub
par rate of return. An investor would earn more on the earnings by putting them in a CD
or money market fund then by reinvesting them into the business.
Often times, the information you find on the balance sheet isn't valuable in and of itself;
it must be compared with something else. There were a few calculations we looked at
that required the use of the income statement, which is the focus of Lesson 4. As you
progress through these lessons, you will find that by using the three financial
statements together, you can garner nearly all of the secrets of any business.
Now, get ready to put your skills to the test. We're going to analyze a few balance
sheets together.
Keep in mind we are analyzing the fiscal balance sheet as of June, 2001. This
information may be different when you go to search on Moneycentral, Yahoo!, or
TheStreet since they will use the most recent data available. The purpose of this
analysis is not to advice you on what to buy, but rather to show you the process of
analyzing a balance sheet.
Cash Position
The first thing you will notice is that Microsoft has $31.6 billion in cash and short term
investments. This doesn't mean much unless you compare it to the company's debt to
find out if it is borrowed money. Glance down the balance sheet and look for any long-
term debt. You'll notice there isn't an entry for it. This isn't a mistake; Microsoft has no
long term debt.
Don't get too excited yet. Remember that some businesses fund day-to-day operations
with short-term loans (think back to our department store executive at Christmas in Part
10). To see if Microsoft is using short term debt to survive, look at the current liabilities.
In 2001, the entire value of Microsoft's current liabilities was $11,132. Compare that to
the $31.6 billion in cash the company has. Does it have enough money to pay off its
debt? Absolutely. Microsoft's balance sheet has 3x the cash necessary to pay off
current liabilities and long term debt. This is without calculating in receivables and other
assets. You can be sure the company is not in any danger of going bankrupt.
Working Capital
Let's calculate the company's working capital. Take the current assets ($39,637) and
subtract the current liabilities ($11,132). The answer is $28,505. Microsoft has $28.5
billion in working capital. To find the working capital per share, look at the bottom of the
balance sheet. You'll see there are 5.383 billion shares outstanding. Take the working
capital of $28.5 billion and divide it by the 5.383 billion shares outstanding. The answer,
$5.29, is the amount of working capital per-share.
If you could buy Microsoft's stock at $5.29 per share, you would be getting all of the
company's fixed assets (real estate, computers, long term investments, etc.) plus its
earnings / profit each year from now until eternity for free! The company will probably
never trade that low; but you should always keep this in mind when analyzing a
business. Sometimes, especially during serious economic downturns, you will find
companies selling close to working capital. (Note: We will discuss stock option dilution
and other advanced concepts in later lessons.)
Working Capital Per Dollar of Sales
We calculated working capital at $28.505 billion. According to Microsoft's income
statement, total revenue (the same thing as total sales) came to $25.296 billion.
Following the formula for Working Capital per Dollar of Sales, we come up with 1.12 (or
112%). This means Microsoft has more working capital than its sales last year; if you
remember from the lesson, manufacturers of heavy machinery require the most
working capital and range from 20-25%. The 112% figure is excessive by anyone's
standard. The main concern should not be financial safety, but efficiency. Why isn't
Microsoft putting this money to work?
Current Ratio
The current ratio should be at least 1.5 but probably not over 3 or 4. Taking Microsoft's
current assets and dividing them by the current liabilities, we find the software company
has a current ratio of 3.56. Unless the business is saving resources to launch new
products, build new production facilities, pay down debt, or pay a dividend to
shareholders, a current ratio this high usually signals that management is not using
cash very efficiently.
Quick Ratio
To calculate the quick ratio, we have to take the quick assets and divide them by
current liabilities. If you've studied Microsoft's current assets, you will notice there is no
entry for inventory. You know that Microsoft sells software; meaning its products consist
of information It doesn't need to carry inventory. As soon as a customer places an
order, the company can load its program onto a CD-ROM or DVD and ship it out the
same day. Because there is no inventory, there is no risk of spoilage or obsolesce.
Inventory is what causes the biggest difference between the current and quick ratio.
The quick ratio was designed to measure the immediate resources of a company
against its current liabilities. Almost all of Microsoft's resources are already liquid. The
only things that aren't are the $1.949 billion in deferred income taxes (how are you
going to use it to raise cash?) and the $2.417 billion attributed to "other" current assets.
Subtract these from the $39,637 billion in current assets and you get $35.271 billion.
This $35 billion in quick assets represents the things the company can turn in to cash
almost immediately. Divide it by the current liabilities ($35.271 divided by $11,132) and
you get 3.168. Even under the most stringent test of financial strength, Microsoft has
$3.168 in current assets for every $1 in liabilities.
Final Thoughts
All of our calculations have shown one thing; the company has virtually no risk of
bankruptcy. Microsoft has 3x the cash it needs to survive, no long term debt, no
inventory to worry about, and extremely strong current and quick ratios. Its working
capital per dollar of sales is 112%, excessive by any standard (especially compared to
its competitors. Adobe Software had a ratio of 36%, while Oracle Systems came in at
46.5%). The main question an investor should ask when looking at the balance sheet
is, "why so much cash?". None of the company's top management has given any clues
as to the plans for the growing pile of greenbacks.
Microsoft's Financial Statement Excerpts
Year Ended June 30 1999 2000 2001
Revenue $19,747 $22,956 $25,296
Cost of Goods Sold $2,814 $3,002 $3,455
Simon Transportation Services filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the early part of 2002.
The company's balance sheet showed signs of strain almost two years prior. We are
going to focus most of our attention on the 2000 part of the balance sheet to
demonstrate that an intelligent investor could have seen warning signs before the
company went under. Note: Since we are going to be focusing on 2000's numbers, we
will not average in 2001's numbers to calculate inventory and receivable turn.
Cash Position
Simon had $3,331,119 in cash in September of 2000. It also had $3,437,120 in short
term loans. This is the first sign the company was using borrowed money to operate.
Almost all of the company's current assets are tied up in receivables, which is a real
concern that customers may not be paying on time.
Working Capital
In 2000, the company had working capital of $15,970,104.
Current Ratio
The current ratio should be at least 1.5 but probably not over 3 or 4. Simon had a
current ratio of 1.631 in 2000. This is mediocre. The quick ratio will be a much better
indication of the company's financial health.
Quick Ratio
The company's quick assets come out to around 1.487.
A quick look into the company's 10k and 10q statements reveals that the short term
loans are secured by the receivables. In plain English, if Simon Transportation fails to
pay its short term loans on time, the bank can go to court and take control of the
receivables. If this were to happen, the business may not have enough cash on hand to
pay its long term debt, which makes up a sizable part of the balance sheet. If Simon
ran into a bump in the road, it probably wouldn't be able to survive because of cash
flow issues.
Final Thoughts
Here's what we've observed: In 2000, a full year before declaring bankruptcy, Simon
Transportation had very little working capital, barely acceptable current and quick
ratios, a high percentage of debt to equity, and inventory that was quickly sold but
slowly collected for. The company may be able to survive as long as it doesn't run into
any problems. An increase in fuel prices, a driver strike, or some other unfavorable
event that increased losses would quicken the company's financial demise. An item of
particular concern is found in the company's 10k, "The Company's top 5, 10, and 25
customers accounted for 24%, 39%, and 57% of revenue, respectively, during fiscal
2000. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue during the fiscal
year."
According to these numbers, each of the top five customers accounted for nearly 5% of
Simon's business. If just one of these switched to another trucking company, five
percent of the business' revenues would have been lost. If the company had profitable
with little or no debt, this would not be a concern. When you're counting on things going
smoothly and you're playing with money that's not your own, you're almost always
headed for disaster.
The bottom line: This is not a company you would invest in if you were looking for
something long term and considerably safe.
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable $46,031,558 $21,844,631
Short Term Debt $74,537,820 $3,437,120
Total Current Liabilities $120,569,408 $25,281,751
Long-Term Liabilities
Long-Term Debt $835,000,000 $16,376,791
Other Liabilities $1,004,000,000 $902,000,000
Deferred Long Term Liability Charges N/A $4,604,318
Total Liabilities $120,569,408 $46,262,860
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred Stock $5,195,434 N/A
Common Stock $62,917 $62,877
Retained Earnings ($50,503,733) ($2,451,176)
Treasury Stock ($1,053,147) ($1,053,147)
Capital Surplus $51,865,007 $48,285,578
Other Stockholder Equity $3,559,918
Total Stockholder Equity $9,126,396 $44,844,132
"In addition to the change in accounting method, during the quarter, Simon experienced
the highest driver turnover in its history. Turnover exacerbated recruiting costs and
contributed to increased claims and repair expense, and low tractor utilization. In
addition, high fuel prices continued to affect the truckload industry, including Simon."
To correct this problem, Simon's management increased driver pay by 2¢ per mile, an
increased cost the company could hardly afford. Perhaps most disturbing of all, the
company openly acknowledged in its 10k around the same time that it was in violation
of its long term debt agreements.
In February of 2002, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Had an
investor been able to analyze a balance sheet, they would have been warned in
advance of the company's problems and possibly avoided huge losses to their portfolio.