Count 1 Willful Killing of Tribal People Constituting War Crimes'
Count 1 Willful Killing of Tribal People Constituting War Crimes'
STATUTE
Pursuant to Art. 8 of the Rome Statute, the Office of the Prosecutor has concluded that there are reasonable
grounds to believe that Commander Jeremy Kaloch of Manochistan Army, Mr. Jabralter Manoch and
Lucifer Rhina bear criminal responsibility under Art. 25(3) (b) of the Rome Statute for the following
crimes:
Count 1
Willful killing of tribal people constituting ‘war Crimes’
(Article 8(2)(a)(Ⅰ) of the Rome Statute)
Article 8 (2) (a) (Ⅰ)1
War crime of willful killing
Elements
1. The perpetrator killed one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons were protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions
of 1949.
3. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected
status.
4. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international
armed conflict.
As per the article 3 and 13 of Geneva conventions relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of
war of 1949, person taking no part in hostilities are saved from any attrocites.
Hence, the Chamber will first analyze whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the contextual
elements of the crimes alleged by the Prosecution in the Prosecution Application are present, and only if the
answer is in the affirmative, will turn its attention to the question as to whether there are reasonable grounds
to believe that the specific elements of any such crime have been met.
In this regard, the Chamber observes that article 8(2)(f) of the Statute, which defines "armed conflicts not of
an international character" for the purpose of article 8(2)(e) of the Statute, states that:
1
The Elements of Crimes are reproduced from the Official Records of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court, First session, New York, 3-10 September 2002 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.03.V.2 and
corrigendum), part II.B.
Paragraph 2 (e) applies to armed conflicts not of an international character and thus does not apply
to situations of internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots, isolated and sporadic acts of
violence or other acts of a similar nature. It applies to armed conflicts that take place in the territory
of a State where there is a protracted armed conflict between governmental authorities and
organized armed groups or between such groups.
The Chamber has also highlighted that article 8(2)(f) of the Statute makes reference to "protracted armed
conflict between [...] organized armed groups", and that, in the view of the Chamber, this focuses on the
need for the organised armed groups in question to have the ability to plan and carry out military operations
for a prolonged period of time.
The Manochistan government in order to curb to the challenges to the centre’s writ, adopted a policy of
eliminating innocent people opposing the committed scheme of government with republic of Rhina.
Manochistan government had given the power to Republic of Rhina to station their republican guard in
Kalochistan responsible of security of commercial establishments. Under pretext of neutralizing the
terrorists many innocent civilians were killed. As per the record of the Manochistan Wing of Amnesty
International released annual report Manochistan army along with local leader of Kalochistan, Jeremy
Kaloch has committed atrocities on people killing at least 5000 civillians to clear areas for construction of
roads and establishments for GROW initiative. Also the Human Rights watch in its detailed report confirms
the mass death caused in concentration camp and extrajudicial murders committed just for smoothening the
way and grabbing the tribal resources.
Count 2
Torture and inhuman treatment constituting ‘war Crimes’
(Article 8(2)(a)(Ⅱ) of the Rome Statute)
War Crime of Torture:
Elements
1. The perpetrator inflicted severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon one or more persons.
2. The perpetrator inflicted the pain or suffering for such purposes as: obtaining information or a
confession, punishment, intimidation or coercion or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind.
3. Such person or persons were protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
4. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected status.
5. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
6. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
As per the article 32 and 147 of Geneva conventions relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of
war of 1949, inflicting torture and inhuman treatment to the persons so protected by the convention is
considered to be the grave breaches.