US 6599130 Claim Chart (Public)
US 6599130 Claim Chart (Public)
US 6,599,130
The ’130 patent (“Moehrle”) (filed on February 2, 2001 without a claim for an earlier
priority date), discloses a system whereby the gestures and comments occurring around an in-
motion event (e.g., a teaching presentation) may be recorded in a time-synchronized fashion to
capture the knowledge expressed during the session for later use. Claim 17 of the alleged
invention (treated as representative of the ’130 patent) recites the use of an “interpretation layer”
for recording gestures and associated comments that is synchronized to and displayed
concurrently with a “video layer” during playback. Claim 17 further recites an “index manager”
for storing comments in a database. However, there was nothing innovative about a system that
displays recorded comments or gestures over a video layer in 2001, as demonstrated by the ’775
patent addressed below.
The ’775 patent (“King”) (filed on August 26, 1994, without a claim for an earlier priority
date) relates to the display of annotations (such as text, graphics, and digital audio) over full-
motion video frames. The abstract explains that the annotation data structure includes a graphical
element for displaying the annotations over the video. King also discloses that the annotation
data is stored indexed in an annotation memory. A sample claim chart comparing the ’130 patent
to the King reference is provided below.
17.f. an index manager for King discloses an annotation data structure that
indexing of the comments or the corresponds to the “index manager” of the ’130 patent. Id.
select portions, or both, within a at 6:19-25 (“The annotation process involves creating an
database; and annotation data structure apart from the indexed data
structure of the video file. This annotation data structure
includes an indication of the index of the annotated frame,
a graphical element which is displayed overlying the
annotated frame when it is displayed, and a data field
storing the actual data of the annotation.”)
1
The term “synchronization means” referenced by claim element 17.d. is identified in the ’130 patent specification
as including a “time code, frame and line code, or other image identifier accompanying the video.” See ’130 Patent
at 2:43-47; see also, id. at 4:48-53 (“The video layer time code 59 is shared with the interpretation layer 47 to
synchronize the two.”). Thus, the term “synchronization means” is construed to include at least “a time code, frame
or line code, or other image identifier that may accompany a video.”