A Comparative Approach - us.UK.H.handout
A Comparative Approach - us.UK.H.handout
Parliamentary systems
Presidential systems
The systems
Presidential systems:
Parliamentary systems
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2018/dec/12/tory-mps-trigger-vote-of-no-
confidence-in-may-amid-brexit-uncertainty-politics-live
Hungary
Executive power
Hungary, Britain:
Vested in the Prime Minister and the Cabinet (PM selects Cabinet ministers and has the
exclusive right to dismiss them)
The president in Hungary has a largely ceremonial role but nominally he is the commander-
in-chief. Elected by the National Assembly for 5 years
US:
President: does not have to belong to the majority party (any natural-born citizen over 35)
CHECKS ON: US: judicial review (SCOTUS) – Hungary: Constitutional Court - Britain:
parliamentary sovereignty
Legislative Power
Differences in the role of committees: in the US function to kill proposed bills in many cases
Hungary:
Parliamentary committees (25) play a significant role in the supervision of the executive
branch
Westminster
Sessions every day usually from 2-30 p.m. until 10.30. p.m. (except on Fridays) – mornings
spent on committee work, working on speeches, problems in the constituencies
House of Lords: supreme legislative body in historic times; under reform at the moment
789 members: 26 Lords Spiritual (archbishops of York & Canterbury, senior bishops); 763
Lords Temporal (90 “hereditary” peers, rest: life peers)
restricted legislative power: Acts of Parliament 1911, 1949 – cannot reject (only delay) bills;
no power with ‘money bills’
role: control and check. warn rather than frustrate Government by amending bills
http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Commons
Congress
Limited gov.: dividing authority between the central gov. and the individual states:
Federalism
Separation of power among 3 branches, each with a separate function and checks-and-
balances
House of Representatives – elected for a 2 year term, number from each state based on
population of states
The National Assembly is a unicameral structure recently reformed (199 members elected
for 4 years)
Party factions have a decisive role in a number of important aspects of parliamentary work.
E.g. the nomination of officers and committee members of the Parliament, as well as
elaboration of the agenda of plenary sessions. MPs participate in the work of the committees
as delegates of the parliamentary factions.
Individual parliamentary control bodies – State Audit Office (the independent, financial and
economic control organization of the National Assembly), the ombudsman Commissioner for
Fundamental Rights and his or her deputies http://www.ajbh.hu/
http://www.parlament.hu/fotitkar/angol/general_info.htm
Electoral systems
The UK
650 constituencies/MPs altogether (533 for England, 40 for Wales, 59 for Scotland, 18 for
Northern Ireland), but only 427 seats in the debating chamber
The USA
For the President, for both houses, for state and local gov. offices
Expensive campaigns
Electoral College
Electors: chosen by a "winner take all" formula >> The candidate winning a state gets all that
state's electoral vote.
The body of electors that chooses the president and vice president. The electors are directed
by the Constitution to vote in their respective states, and Congress is authorized to count
their votes.
Electors are chosen in a series of state elections held on the same day (election day). The
number of electoral votes of each state is the sum of its number of U.S. Senators (always two)
and its U.S. Representatives; the District of Columbia has three electoral votes.
In each state, voters vote for a slate (list) of pre-selected candidates for Presidential Elector,
representing the various candidates for President.
The Presidential Electors of each state (and DC) meet 41 days following the popular vote to
cast the electoral votes. The Electors ballot first for President, then for Vice President.
“faithless electors”.
To win, a presidential candidate must have a majority in the electoral college (min. 270)
2000 Election
Bush and Gore were in a virtual dead heat in Florida, but all 27 of Florida's electoral votes
were going to go to either Bush or Gore.
A candidate can win the popular vote and still lose the Electoral College: focusing on different
outcomes in large population states vs. small population states.
Running up large margins of victory in the big states but losing many of the small states by
close votes >> can win more votes and still lose in the Electoral College. This is what
happened to Al Gore.
Nationally, Gore won 560,000 more votes than Bush. Gore won two of the three largest
states by large margins, while Bush won his home state of Texas.
Gore won California (54 electoral votes) by almost 1.3 million votes. Bush won Texas (32
electoral votes) by almost 1.4 million votes.
But Gore won New York (33 electoral votes) by more than 1.5 million votes. He also won
Illinois (22 electoral votes) by approximately 570,000 votes. Gore would have benefited from
having his vote spread more evenly through the country. Bush's closer victories in many
smaller states gave him more electoral votes than Gore's larger margins of victories in
California, New York, and Illinois.
http://bcove.me/ge0iv15n (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/al-gore-hillary-clinton-
each-vote-matters-229625)
2016 election
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37889032
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/12/20/why-electoral-college-landslides-are-
easier-to-win-than-popular-vote-ones/
Elections in Hungary
mixed electoral system, which contains both a majoritarian and a proportional element, has
been retained, though with a slight shift towards the majoritarian principle
number of seats and electoral districts reduced (the latter from 176 to 106)
three-tier system (single member constituencies; regional list and national list ) replaced with
a two-tier one (no national list)
changes in the rules for candidate registration (e.g. candidates have to collect 1000
recommendation coupons to be able to run for election, as opposed to 750 under the old
law)
Hungarian citizens living abroad granted voting rights (but they can only vote for party lists)
the first election according to the new Constitution of Hungary (The Fundamental Law of
Hungary went into force on 1 January 2012)
For the first time since Hungary's transition to democracy, the election had a single round.
JUDICIAL POWER in US
3 levels
the Supreme Court (created in the Constitution) – 9 members, justices (appointed by the
president, „nine old men”), head of the court: Chief Justice.
SCOTUS has the power to influence the law through a process called judicial review
13 courts of appeal
many federal district courts, special courts (Court of International Trade, eg)
the President appoints federal judges; Senate has to confirm the nominations – keep their
jobs for life, can remain independent from gov.
ROLE: interprets and applies the law by trying federal cases, can declare laws passed by
Congress and executive actions unconstitutional.
Judicial Power UK
The President of the Supreme Court of Hungary and the Hungarian civil and penal legal
system he leads is fully independent of the Executive Branch.
The Attorney General or Chief Prosecutor of Hungary is currently fully independent of the
Executive Branch, but his status is actively debated
Several ombudsman offices exist in Hungary to protect civil, minority, educational and
ecological rights in non-judicial matters. They have held the authority to issue legally binding
decisions since late 2003