Stdy RCD PDF
Stdy RCD PDF
Sponsored by
PLANNING COMMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
The Planning Commission assigned a case study on Rural Cluster Development to the
Society for Economic and Social Transition (SEST). The objective of the study is to
assess, through field surveys, the ground situation regarding existing clusters of small-
scale industries, the problems faced by them and measures to be adopted to improve
the viability of existing clusters as well as the formation of new clusters.
The study has been undertaken in four districts of the state of Uttar Pradesh which have
a rich heritage of rural small-scale industries. The districts selected are those in which
the programme of Rashtriya Sam Vikas Yojana is being implemented. These districts
have better access to resources for rural development programmes which include
implementation of rural cluster development programme.
The study found that while there are very few formal clusters which are recognized and
assisted by the State Government as such, small-scale entrepreneurs of units having
similarities in products, services or raw materials have grouped themselves into informal
clusters to avail the benefits of group action. The study thus extends both to “natural
clusters” formed by units set up to take advantage of locally available skills, raw
materials, proximity to market etc. as well as to “induced clusters” set up by the
government or other agencies through the creation of infrastructure accompanied by a
range of technical services designed to cater to a group of units in a local area.
The survey indicates that small-scale entrepreneurs are quite resourceful and clearly
perceive the advantages of clusterisation. While deficiencies of infrastructure, difficulties
in timely availability of finance etc are cited as problems, the entrepreneurs are equally
keen over getting assistance in economic procurement of upgraded appropriate
technology, getting R&D support from government institutions, training facilities for their
managers, technicians and workers in different areas and regular availability of
information about market trends and marketing opportunities.
The study has come out with some recommendations based on survey analysis,
intensive interactions with the small-scale entrepreneurs, local government officials and
other knowledgeable persons. We hope these will be of interest to the concerned
government departments and industry associations as also to non-government
organisations and researchers in this area.
Shahzad Bahadur
Project Director
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This research study on Rural Cluster Development was conducted with the grant-in-aid
sanctioned by the Planning Commission, Government of India. The report now
presented is the effort of a team of researchers of the Society of Economic and Social
Transition (SEST).
The basic idea for the study emerged out of discussions held in the Working Group on
Rural Cluster Development constituted under the chairmanship of the Advisor (VSI),
Planning Commission. Director SEST, as a member of the working group, had the
benefit of discussions with officers of the Planning Commission, KVIC, SIDBI, NGOs and
others on the subject.
The scheme for project implementation was drawn by S.K.Sinha who also acted as
coordinator. The field studies for the project were conducted under the guidance of
S.K.Sinha and BAL Krishna. Statistical analysis and tabulation was supervised by Bal
Krishna. A.K.Sarkar assisted with the tabulation and analysis of data. Sourcing of
relevant research material through the internet was assisted by Vivek Mathur.
The administrative aspects of the project were looked after by R.C.Nandwani. Computer
assistance was provided by Savita Sharma.
The research study was conducted under the overall guidance of Dr S.P.Gupta,
Honorary Chairman, SEST whose advice at all stages was crucial in providing unity,
coherence and direction to the study.
Shahzad Bahadur
Project Director
iv
CONTENTS
_______________________________________________________
Chapter Pages
________________________________________________________________
Preface i
Acknowledgement ii
I Introduction 13-22
Tables 71-195
References 197
v
LIST OF TABLES
_______________________________________________________
Pages
_____________________________________________________________________________
vi
LIST OF TABLES (Cont..)
_______________________________________________________
Pages
_____________________________________________________________________________
vii
LIST OF TABLES (Cont..)
_______________________________________________________
Pages
_____________________________________________________________________________
viii
RURAL CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT
A CASE STUDY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ix
v. To study the availability of raw materials, finance, technical and
managerial manpower in proposed clusters and suggested ways of
improvement therein.
vi. To assess the impact of technology upgradation in improving the
viability of clusters in different sectors of small and tiny industries.
vii. Requirements of training for entrepreneurs and managers.
viii. Other issues relevant to the increase in profitability of clusters.
5. The state of Uttar Pradesh known for the large variety of small industries
operating in different districts was chosen for the study. Four districts of
Uttar Pradesh namely Unnao. Barabanki. Hardoi and Gorakhpur were
selected for the study. These districts are included in the Rashtriya Sam
Vikas Yojana, (RSVY) and have a number of small and medium industries
of different categories running in them to enable a critical study being made
of the functioning of formal and informal clusters. In each district two
Development Blocks were identified based on the discussion held with the
District Planning Officers and in each selected Block, four villages/ semi-
urban areas were selected for conducting the study. Thus eight
villages/semi urban areas in each district were covered for the study. In
each district 150 respondents were contacted through a well-designed
questionnaire. About 125 respondents were owners of small industries of
different categories and 25 were the government officials and other
knowledgeable persons. In all, 611 respondents in all the four districts were
covered.
6. Gorakhpur has the oldest established units where more than 45 per cent of
the units were established prior to 1970. In the other three districts, most of
the units were established in 1990s or even later. Out of 611 surveyed units,
x
65 per cent units are engaged in manufacturing activities, 18 per cent in
processing activities and the rest in servicing activities. More than 40 per
cent of the units were household industries and more than 35 per cent of the
units were reported as proprietorship firms.
7. Analysis of financial parameters revealed that the surveyed units were more
economical in the use of capital as compared to the national average given
in the Third All India Census of Small Scale Industries. Their average output
is also comparable.
8. The 611 surveyed units employed a total of 5498 workers (4462 males and
1036 females), an average of 9 employees per unit as against the all-India
average of 4.48. The share of technical employees in total employment was
observed as 45 per cent (46 per cent for males and 39 per cent for
females). The share of contract workers was 18 per cent, of daily wage
workers 19 per cent and of family workers 18 per cent. The share of women
in the surveyed units was 18.84 per cent. It was more for family workers (28
per cent) and less for contract workers (14 per cent). The national average
for female employment is 13.31 per cent but the average for Uttar Pradesh
is very low at 5.11 per cent according to Third All India Census of Small
Scale Industries.
9. The growth of employment as ascertained from the surveyed units for the
period s 2001 to 2004 has been of the order of 5 per cent per annum. The
demand for technicians and skilled workers is expected to remain strong but
the skills will have to suit the existing industries or those being set up. The
demand and supply of skills can best be matched through planned
formation and strengthening of industrial clusters. The overall percentage of
female workers has gone down from 19.5 per cent in 2001 to 18.8 per cent
in 2004 mainly on account of decrease in the number of contract
employees. While the increase in female family workers could be on
account of domestic circumstances, the increase in the number of female
technical persons is a positive development.
xi
10. The surveyed units complained about quality of power, inte rruptions in
supply and high tariffs. There were not many complaints about water supply
and availability of raw materials. Provision of storage facilities was desired.
11. The survey has revealed that most of the SSI entrepreneurs are well aware
of the benefits of cooperation and group action even though they may not
be aware of the concept of clusterisation as enunciated by UNIDO and other
agencies. It is recognized that the collective strength of clusters enables its
members to get assistance in availability of raw materials on better terms,
availability of finances for setting up projects, obtaining government
subsidies, updating technology of production, identification of markets,
transportation, storage and marketing. Mutual discussion, increased
awareness and competition within the cluster are also beneficial to the
national economy through more efficient use of raw material, efficient use of
power, increase in productivity leading to increase in workers’ income, a
more congenial labour owner relationship, evolution of local leadership and
promotion of innovation and creativity.
12. Most of the respondents feel that being part of a cluster ensures easier and
timely availability of raw materials as also at a better price, advantage of
adequate storage and highe r credit limits from banks. The presence of
cluster also leads to improvement in availability of quality control facilities. It
ensures regular off take of production leading to low inventories. Being
members of a group, they obtain quicker perception of market changes and
desired improvement in the quality of products. Infrastructure facilities of
roads, power, water supply and pollution control measures can be provided
more conveniently and at lesser cost per unit to clusters of industries.
Membership of clusters helps in obtaining government subsidies and in
getting bank finance.
14. The handloom sector has obtained the best advantage of clusterisation. In
this sector the maximum number of industrial units obtained the advantage
of assistance in technology upgradation followed by assistance in obtaining
raw materials, assistance in obtaining better and economic transport and
assistance in obtaining government subsidy. The handicraft cluster units
received the minimum advantage of clusterisation.
15. While the main driving force for clusterisation is the profit to individual
industrial units, such profit maximization by the units, also, leads to
economical use of national resources. Efficient use of power through
interaction in groups has been reported by several units. Strengthening of
infrastructure of rural roads and power lines etc has also been reported by
the group members.
16. The units have, also, given their views regarding the constraints faced by
them in operating these units at maximum efficiency. The biggest deficiency
concerns infrastructure. Erratic power supply and poor connectivity (to
power grid) have been cited as the foremost constraints to growth and it is
felt most keenly in Gorakhpur. Lack of marketing facilities is the second
most felt constraint. The entrepreneurs are not fully aware of government
policies regarding small-scale industry and clusterisation and are not able to
take their full advantage. The district and the village level officials are not of
much help. While the entrepreneurs are fully aware of the necessity of
technological upgradation in order to remain competitive as regards quality
and price, they lack knowledge about latest technologies and the cost of
acquiring such technologies is also a deterrent.
xiii
17. The need for training is keenly felt by the entrepreneurs. The requirements
of training vary for entrepreneurs and managers and for technicians and
skilled workers and have been specified by them in detail.
The areas in which entrepreneurs expressed the need for training are as
follows:
Upgradation of technology
Obtaini ng finance
Dealing with market
Energy conservation
The areas in which need for training for managers are perceived are as
follows:
i. Administration
ii. Production
iii. Labour management
iv. Market trends
v. Finance and marketing
vi. Technological upgradation
vii. Quality and cost control
viii Designs in line with changing tastes and market requirements
The areas in which training needs are perceived for technicians and
skilled workers are:
xiv
ii. Inform entrepreneurs, specially small ones, about facilities
made available by the government and financing institutions.
Dissemination of such information to clusters through newsletter
etc. should be formalized.
iii. Simplify and liberalize procedures for sanction of loans on
single window concept and in a time bound manner
iv. Ensure availability of power and water at reasonable rates.
v. Improve communications
vi. Assist clusters with market information
vii. Assist clusters in selection of proper technology for upgradation.
viii. R&D for technology improvement / upgradation and availability
of R&D to small entrepreneur.
ix. Provide training facilities focusing on needs of clusters
The efforts of the government need to be supplemented by the banks,
financing institutions and other development agencies.
19. The financial and manpower resources of the government are limited and
practically, it is not possible to provide all the assistance needed by all the
small-scale units to remove their bottlenecks and increase their productivity.
It is, therefore, essential to concentrate on the formation and operation of
industrial clusters which should emerge as centres of excellence. The
example of a few successful clusters will induce the other individual units to
come together as clusters and consolidate their strength through unity.
20. The respondents were also asked to give their views as to the nature of
clusters that they considered viable in their districts. The two factors they
considered most important were availability of raw materials and of skilled
workers. They are of the opinion that about 30 clusters can be successfully
established in the four surveyed districts. Product-wise details have been
given.
21. The survey confirms that Small Scale Industry can contribute very
significantly to employment and income generation. The role of Small Scale
Industry (SSI) in providing employment opportunities and mobilizing local
xv
skills and capital resources has been recognized in all the six Industrial
Policy Resolutions adopted by successive Governments at the Centre. In
the pre-reform period, the Government initiated various reform measures
from time to time to facilitate the rapid development of the SSI sector. These
included policy of reservation, periodical revision of investment ceilings,
schemes for modernization and technological upgradation, marketing
assistance, fiscal incentives etc. In the post-reform period, there has been a
shift in focus from “protection” to “promotion”. The steps taken include
enhancement of investment limits, establishment of growth centres, export
promotion, marketing assistance, incentives for quality improvement etc. An
important initiative in the post-reform period is the emphasis laid on the
cluster development programme. The cluster development approach has
been fully established in government policies. The basic requirement now is
for faithful and efficient implementation of these policies.
22. A primary objective of promoting SSIs has been their high employment
potential specially in rural and backward areas. The growth of employment
in the SSI sector during the period 2001-02 has been estimated in the
Economic Survey as 4.4 per cent. The employment growth in the surveyed
units is higher at 5.1 per cent for about the same period. An encouraging
feature of the employment scenario in the surveyed units is that about 45
per cent of the employment is for technical persons. It implies that unit
owners are realizing the value of quality production which can be achieved
only by employing properly qualified technical persons which would include
technicians and skilled workmen.
xix
CHAPTER - I
INTRODUCTION
1.1.2. The Government has been assisting the SSI sector through policies for
reservation of products for exclusive manufacture in SSI sector,
preferential purchase policy, preferential access to credit, assistance in
technology upgradation and other measures. A comprehensive package
of incentives for SSI sector was announced by the Prime Minister on 30
August 2000.
xx
S.S.I. through the Third All India Census of Small Scale Industries (2001-
2002) has placed the number of clusters as 1223 in the registered sector
covering 321 products and 819 in the unregistered sector covering 250
products. The number of handicraft clusters has been assessed as 3000
by DC Handicrafts. Number of existing clusters in specific type of
industries such as handlooms has been estimated by different
organizations.
1.3.4. A significant fact brought to light in the UNIDO study of clusters was that
125 of these clusters have been classified as “natural clusters”. These
clusters have been formed by units set up to take advantage of locally
available skills, raw materials, proximity to market etc. Gradually, similar
types of industries grow in number by utilizing the existing pool of trained
workers who shift from one unit to another. These clusters have grown
spontaneously and not as a result of any policy of the government. On the
other hand, only 13 of the 138 clusters were set up by the government or
other agencies through the creation of infrastructure accompanied by a
range of technical services designed to cater to a group of units in a local
area. Such clusters formed as a result of intervention by the government
or other agency are termed as “induced clusters”. It was also revealed that
while market opportunities had induced formation of 99 clusters, another
33 were formed due to facilities of raw materials or skilled labour.
1.3.5. The conditions conducive to the formation and functioning of clusters have
favoured their location in or near cities where 65 per cent of such clusters
xxiii
are located. Only about 13 per cent are located in small towns and rural
areas. In order to ensure dispersion of industrial activity, employment and
income generation in the rural areas, special efforts and policy measures
are required.
1.4.3. The Ministry of Commerce and Industry has an ambitious scheme for
development of industrial clusters during the Tenth Plan period with an
outlay of Rs 675 crore. Under the scheme, industrial clusters with high
growth potential are picked up. The scheme emphasizes converting static
local efficiency into dynamic competitiveness. The scheme supports
innovation, product design and development through association with
specific R&D institutions. It assists the cluster units in developing common
facilities like raw material depots, testing facilities, design centres,
information hub etc. It also assists in appropriate technology transfer,
xxiv
information sharing and quality improvement. The share of government in
funding the cost of any project under the scheme is limited to 75 per cent
of project cost. The remaining 25 per cent has to be financed by other
stakeholders of the respective cluster. Similar scheme with adequate
outlay is required to be approved for the SSI sector.
1.4.4. The Tenth Plan outlay for the SSI sector is Rs 3449 crore which is only 3.6
per cent higher as compared to the Ninth Plan outlay. This could be due to
non-utilization of about 13 per cent of the Ninth Plan outlay. The position
of utilization needs to be improved in the Tenth Plan. Allocation of
additional funds to the different agencies under the Ministry of Small Scale
Industry for the time bound development of identified clusters of small
scale industries, handlooms and handicrafts is essential. The allocation
should cover the financing and implementation of cluster specific projects
on a pattern similar to that of the cluster scheme of the Ministry of
Commerce and Industry mentioned above. Implementation of these
projects will go a long way in improving the health of the cluster units and
generate additional income and employment.
1.5.1. The small scale industries in any cluster, existing or proposed, will have to
take into account the changes that have occurred in the industrial,
commercial and financial environment on account of liberalisation of the
economy and globalisation. The small-scale industry had, prior to
liberalisation, operated in a protected environment with large scale
reservation, subsidies and little competition from foreign goods in most of
its products. This situation has changed radically and for the worse as far
as small scale industry is concerned.
1.5.2. The de-reservation of most of the items reserved for the small-scale
industry has placed it in competition with indigenous large-scale industry
which can produce the same products cheaper and of better quality due to
economics of scale, improved technology and easier access to credit. If
xxv
small scale units are to survive and prosper, these facilities will need to be
extended consciously in greater measure in order to obtain the larger
benefits to the national economy in terms of employment and alleviation of
poverty specially in rural and semi- urban areas.
1.5.3. The removal of quantitative restrictions and lowering of cus toms tariffs has
thrown open the Indian market to cheap foreign products from
neighbouring countries. Some safeguards are available through levy of
anti dumping duties but the long -term solution for indigenous small-scale
industry is to upgrade production technology, improve worker efficiency
and productivity and ensure consistency in quality of production.
1.5.4. The removal of quotas for our textile products should also be taken as
opportunity rather than as a handicap. Technology upgradation,
continuous improvement of quality and changes in designs to conform to
the requirements and tastes of foreign buyers can certainly enhance our
market share in the developed countries. It will also improve the
competitiveness of the products of small-scale industry in relation to
similar products of our own large-scale industry.
Panchayti Raj Institutions at village and block level can play an active role
in rural cluster development. Local Panchayats are the key to the locality /
region where the clusters are likely to be developed. Panchayats could
provide ground level guidance to the government officials/ agencies in
developing infrastructure like roads, water and power. They could help the
entrepreneurs in conceptualizing viable projects using local resources of
raw materials and skills and could stand guarantor / surety to the
entrepreneurs for the financial assistance from banks / financial
xxvi
institutions. Panchayats could even provide some financial help to small
enterprises. Panchayats could help the entrepreneurs in getting suitable
manpower. Panchayats could also play an important role in developing
better relations between labour and owners. Panchayats could also help
the entrepreneurs in building construction, acquiring land and also provide
godowns for storage of products if necessary. In this way the role of
Panchayti Raj Institutions is important in the development of rural clusters.
1.8.1 Uttar Pradesh has been known for the large variety of small industries
operating in different parts of the State. The state, according to the Third
xxvii
All India Census of Small Scale Industries, had 17,07,977 SSI units which
were 16.23 per cent of the total SSI units in the country. The state,
therefore has been chosen for conducting the case study on “ Rural
Cluster Development”.
1.8.2 The study intends to determine the actual field situation in respect of small
scale industries including village industries and their problems in respect
of inputs, labour and marketing of their output (i.e. goods and services)
and to determine as to how these problems could be solved or at least
minimized through the formation of suitable clusters. The study thus aims
to provide inputs for policy formulation regarding development of viable
rural industries clusters.
1.8.3 For the purpose of this case study, four districts of Uttar Pradesh were
selected. The Planning Commission desired that the districts selected for
the study should be chosen from the districts identified under Rashtriya
Sam Vikas Yojana, (RSVY) and should be such which already, have a
number of small and medium industries of different categories running in
them to enable a critical study being made of their functioning as also the
possibilities of cluster formation.
1.8.4 The idea of linking the study with RSVY was that the suggestions thrown
up by the study could be implemented better in RSVY districts where
resources and infrastructure facilities could be made available more
easily. The following four districts of Uttar Pradesh have been selected for
the study.
1. Unnao
2. Hardoi
3. Barabanki, and
4. Gorakhpur
All the above districts selected for the study are identified under RSVY.
xxviii
1.9 Selection of Cluster Units.
The information thus obtained has been analysed and report has been
prepared based on the assessments and perceptions of individuals and
organisations who are actual participants in the formation and
implementation of rural industries clusters. The report, thus, presents the
ground realities of clusterisation and the suggestions offered in the report
are based on the actual experience of the respondents in existing clusters,
government officials and other knowledgeable persons who are concerned
with the developmental activities. The report, therefore, is expected to be
helpful to the Planning Commission while considering appropriate
guidelines for Rural Cluster Development.
District statistics for the district of Unnao for the year 2002-03 indicates
that there were 80 small-scale industries and 2425 khadi and village
industries. Leather, handicrafts, engineering and chemical industries were
the main constituents. The SSIs employed about 700 persons besides
their owners.
Barabanki district had 4462 SSIs and 176 khadi and village industries.
Handloom, fabrication, tractor trolleys and wooden furniture were the main
items produced. SSIs employed about 6000 persons.
xxx
Gorakhpur district has a tradition of nurturing small industries. The district,
in 2002-03 had 466 SSIs employing 1662 persons and 126 khadi and
village industries employing 925 persons. The main industries were
handlooms, handicrafts and light engineering goods, paints, shoe soles
and furniture.
The methodology of the survey was discussed with the local officers and
two development blocks were selected as representative in each district
taking into account the concentration of particular types of SSI units there.
The existence of clusters as also the potential for the formation of new
clusters of different types of industry was considered. About 150 units
selected in each district were chosen to give representation to different
types of industry. A total of six hundred eleven units have, thus, been
covered in the study, 154 units in Unnao, 154 units in Barabanki, 153 units
in Hardoi and 150 units in Gorakhpur. (Ref. Table-1)
Gorakhpur has the oldest established units where more than 45 per cent
of the units were established prior to 1970. In the other three districts,
most of the units were established in 1990s or even later. (Ref. Table-1)
The surveyed units have been classified as SSI units, handloom units and
handicraft units. It has been observed that more than 30 per cent of the
units in Unnao are under SSI category, whereas number of such units in
Gorakhpur district is more than 75 per cent. In Barabanki district, SSI
covers more than 40 per cent of the industrial units while in Hardoi also it
is about 40 per cent. Barabanki district has more than 30 per cent units in
handloom clusters whereas in the other three districts it is only about 10
per cent or less. (Ref. Table-1)
2.1.9 Out of six hundred eleven units, 65 per cent units are engaged in
manufacturing activities and 18 per cent in processing activities. Thus
more than 80 per cent of the units are found engaged in manufacturing
and processing activities. This distribution has been observed in all the
districts. Service providing units constituted only 4 per cent of the total
xxxi
units, the highest percentage of 9 per cent being observed in Hardoi
district followed by 6 per cent in Unnao. (Ref. Table-2)
It has also been observed that more than 40 per cent of the units were
household industries and more than 35 per cent of the units were reported
as proprietorships firms. Around 45 per cent of the units were reported as
not using power which appears to be surprising. However, in Gorakhpur
district, such units were less than 20 per cent. (Ref. Table 3 and Table– 4)
Capital employed
The main advantage of the small scale industries to the national economy,
as also to the small entrepreneur, is their low capital base. It has been
observed for the surveyed units that more than 85 per cent of them have
their fixed capital below Rs. 5 lakhs, the percentage varying from 79 per
cent to 99 per cent in different districts. Only 5 per cent of the units were
found to have the fixed capital in the range of Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs 10 lakhs.
At the national level, according to Third All India Census of Small Scale
Industries (year 2001-02), 96 per cent of SSI units had fixed capital below
Rs 5 lakhs while only 1 per cent had it between 5 to 10 lakhs (Ref. Table–
6). The survey reveals that fixed capital requirements have increased in
the three years since the Third Census. The national average for fixed
investment per unit increased from 1.60 lakhs for Second Census (1990-
91) to Rs 6.68 lakhs for the Third SSI Census (2001-02).
As far as working capital is concerned, 85 per cent of the units are having
working capital less than Rs. 2 lakhs and only 5 per cent of the units were
found to have the working capital in the range of Rs. 2 lakhs to Rs 5 lakhs
while another 5 per cent fall in the range of Rs 5 lakhs to Rs 10 lakhs. In
case of Gorakhpur and Hardoi districts, the units having working capital
less than Rs. 2 lakhs are around 95 per cent. (Ref. Table -7)
xxxii
Annual Output
The annual output of the surveyed units is low. About 75 per cent of the
units have output below Rs. 5 lakhs whereas about 10 per cent have
outputs in the range of Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs 10 lakhs (Ref. Table -8).
According to Third SSI Census (year 2001-02), at the national level the
average gross output per unit of registered SSI units was Rs 4.22 lakhs.
The analysis of capital/labour ratio indicates that units in SSI clusters are
more capital intensive. The SSI units have to invest Rs 2.36 lakh for
employing one person whereas for other units it is Rs 46,000. Handloom
and Handicraft clusters seem to use much less capital for employing one
person which is Rs 11,000 and Rs 6,000 respectively. (Ref. Table – 12A)
The output/ labour ratio indicates that the maximum output per labour has
been observed in SSI clusters which is Rs 1.95 lakh. This varies from
district to district and maximum output of Rs 3.92 lakh is observed in
Barabanki district whereas minimum output of Rs 57,000 is observed in
Gorakhpur district. (Ref. Table -12C)
The average capital/output ratio for all surveyed units is 1.08. It is the
highest for Barabanki district at 1.85 and lowest for Hardoi at 0.27. It is
0.41 for Unnao and 0.59 for Gorakhpur. The capital/output ratio is
dependent on the type of industry which is more capital intensive in
Barabanki. Again, the lowest capital/output ratio is for Handicraft cluster at
0.18 and highest for SSI units at 1.21. (Ref. Table–12B)
xxxiii
2.3 Distribution of Units by Size of Employment.
2.3.1 The 611 surveyed units employed a total of 5498 workers (4462 males
and 1036 females), an average of 9 employees per unit. About 48 per cent
of the surveyed units were found to employ less than five persons. This
percentage however varies from district to district. In Hardoi district, more
than 60 per cent units were having less than five employees and the
number of such units in Unnao districts constitutes more than 45 per cent.
It has also been observed that the units employing between 5 to 9 persons
in Barabanki, Gorakhpur, Hardoi and Unnao districts were 49 per cent, 45
per cent, 31 per cent and 27 per cent respectively with an average of 38
per cent. 10 per cent of the industrial units were found to have employed
between 10 and 19 persons, such units being 12 per cent each in
Gorakhpur and Barabanki district and 14 per cent in Unnao. Only 16 units
(3 per cent) employed between 20 to 50 persons and only 8 units (1 per
cent) above 50 persons. (Ref. Table–9)
The Third SSI Census reveals that per unit employment for SSI units at
the national level has gone down from 6.29 in the Second Census to 4.48
in the Third Census.
The share of women in the surveyed units was 18.84 per cent. It was
more for family workers (28 per cent) and less for contract workers (14 per
cent). The national average for female employment is 13.31 per cent but
the average for Uttar Pradesh is very low at 5.11 per cent according to
Third SSI Census while it is as high as 37.15 per cent for Kerala. The
survey, however, indicates that female employment is showing
improvement.
xxxiv
2.3.2 The share of technical workers was higher for handlooms (48.4 per cent)
and handicrafts (51.4 per cent) and lower for SSI units (45.6 per cent).
District wise highest proportion of technically qualified persons is found in
Hardoi (49.8 per cent) followed by Gorakhpur and Barabanki at 48.2 per
cent each and 35.6 per cent for Unnao. (Ref. Table –11A)
2.3.4 This also points to proper direction being given to the training institutes
regarding training requirements. Often there is a mis-match between the
expertise of the tradesmen and technicians coming out of the training
institutes and the requirements of the local industry. This problem can be
resolved to a large extent through a proper plan of clusterisation which
would enable the most efficient use of resources including the resources
of training.
2.7.1 The respondents were of the view that cluster formation would be helpful
in the identification of markets for the products of the industrial units
working in the area. More than 50 per cent of the units were of this view
and emphasized that regular off take of their production will bring down
inventory costs. About 45 per cent emphasized role of easier
transportation in bringing down costs. It is interesting to note that in
Barabanki district, regular payment by buyers was reported by than 66 per
cent of the units. (Ref. Table-17)
2.7.2 The need for quick perception of market changes in tastes, quality and
quantity of goods to be produced for sale was emphasized by more than
50 per cent of the respondents. Such information is not available to a
xxxvii
small entrepreneur. They desired some common facility and government
assistance for the monitoring and communication of such information.
They expressed awareness of the fact that clusterisation would enable
easier and quicker dissemination of emerging market trends. (Ref. Table–
17)
Growth of employment
2.10.1 Information about employment has been obtained from the respondents
for two periods namely for the years 2001 and 2004. It has been tabulated
xl
for four categories namely technical persons, contract workers, daily wage
workers and family workers. The average rate of growth of employment
during the period 2001-04 has been of the order of 5 per cent per annum.
(Ref. Table -10A and Table-11A)
The growth of employment in the surveyed units can be seen from the
following figures:
2.10.3 It is seen that the maximum number of workers are in the category of
technical persons (45 per cent) while in the other categories they are
almost equally divided at about 18 per cent each. This implies that small
industry owners are consciously using their skilled workers and technically
trained persons to streamline their production and to upgrade their
technology in order to produce better quality products economically for
meeting market requirements. It also implies that demand for technicians
and skilled workers will remain strong but the skills will have to suit the
existing industries or those being set up. The demand and supply of skills
can best be matched through planned formation and strengthening of
industrial clusters.
2.10.4 It will, also, be seen that employment growth has been steady for all the
four categories of workers. The maximum growth is seen in daily wage
workers, which indicates that industries are expanding but will like to wait
for hiring regular employees till their expansion consolidates. Technical
persons, which form the mist important constituent of the workers, have
shown a consistent and encouraging increase.
xli
2.10.5 Female employment has also shown steady increase except for contract
workers. However, the overall percentage of female workers has gone
down from 19.5 per cent in 2001 to 18.8 per cent in 2004 mainly on
account of decrease in the number of contract employees. While the
increase in female family workers could be on account of domestic
circumstances, the increase in the number of female technical persons is
a positive development.
HANDLOOM
HANDICRAFT
xlii
OTHER
ALL UNITS
2.10.7 Average annual growth of employment has been observed as 5 per cent
which is nearly the same as observed in the Third All India Census of
Small Scale Industries. The rate of growth differs from district to district
and with categories of employees as well. The maximum rate of growth at
5.75 per cent has been observed in Gorakhpur district followed by 5.31
per cent in Hardoi district, 4.81 per cent in Barabanki and 4.51 per cent un
Unnao district. So far as categories of employees are concerned, the
highest growth rate was observed in daily wage workers at 7 per cent per
annum. The average rate of growth in employment of technical persons
for all the four districts was observed as 4.9 per cent whereas family
worker’s growth was 5.1 per cent. Contract employees were observed to
grow at 3.6 per cent annually. For technical persons Hardoi district was
having maximum growth rate of 5.59 per cent whereas Gorakhpur had
5.03 per cent, Barabanki 4.14 per cent and Unnao only 2.32 per cent.
xliii
with the total employment in SSI cluster. However the growth of technical
persons in each district except Hardoi was less than the growth of total
employment in the particular district. In Hardoi district growth rate of
technical persons in employment was observed to be 8.4 per cent against
the growth of 7.6 per cent of all employees. In Gorakhpur district growth of
technical persons was observed around 5.1 per cent against the overall
employment growth of 5.7 per cent whereas in Barabanki district against
the growth of 5.1 per cent in overall employment, the growth rate of
technical persons was around 4.5 per cent. In Unnao district growth rate of
total employment is less at 2.3 per cent and the growth rate for technical
persons at 1.6 per cent. It appears that Unnao district is backward in SSI
development and accordingly the employment of technical persons in that
district for SSI units is also low.
Employability
It appears from the analysis that SSI clusters offer good opportunities for
employment of technical persons except in Unnao. Handloom clusters
offer somewhat better opportunities of employment for technical persons
as compared to the Handicraft clusters. In other types of clusters the
employability of technical persons seems to be lower but the contract
employees in this cluster were observed to have more employment
opportunities. Keeping in view the significant share of technical persons in
employment it could be inferred that cluster development in rural areas is
important to create additional employment for skilled and semi-skilled
workers and specially for technically qualified persons. Cluster
development is also expected to encourage entrepreneurship
development for both men and women, as today’s technical persons
become tomorrow’s entrepreneurs.
xlv
CHAPTER- III
Awareness Of Clusterisation
3.1.1 Clusters have been known to have existed in India for centuries and much
before the evolution of the concept of SSI development as a plank of state
policy. The survey has revealed that most of the SSI entrepreneurs are
aware of the benefits of cooperation and group action even though they
may not be aware of the concept of clusterisation as enunciated by
UNIDO and other agencies. SSI units producing similar products have
been getting together naturally in procuring raw materials, in transportation
of goods, in marketing and other activities even where there are no formal
clusters. The efficiency and profitability of these units could be advanced
significantly through proper organisation of appropriate clusters.
3.1.2 Experience with cluster formation indicates that significant benefits accrue
as a result of clusterisation. The collective strength of clusters enables its
members to get assistance in availability of raw materials on better terms,
availability of finances for setting up projects, obtaining government
subsidies, updating technology of production, identification of markets,
transportation, storage and marketing. Mutual discussion, increased
awareness and competition within the cluster are also beneficial to the
national economy through more efficient use of raw material, efficient use
of power, increase in productivity leading to increase in workers income, a
more congenial labour owner relationship, evolution of local leadership
and promotion of innovation and creativity. These hypotheses have been
tested through responses of the survey.
3.1.3 The responses received in the survey cover a wide range of small-scale
industries as also a range of opinions. Ten major groups of industries
covered in the four districts of Unnao, Gorakhpur, Barabanki and Hardoi
are garments, dying and printing, cotton and wooden shawls, zari work,
xlvi
leather products, carpets, wood furniture, food products, engineering
industry and fabrication. These products have been classified amongst
four types of groups or informal clusters namely SSI, handloom,
handicrafts and others. More than 25 per cent of the units are found
engaged in garments, whereas about 10 per cent units are engaged in
zari and about 5 per cent in carpet manufacturing. Around 15 per cent of
the industrial units were engaged in wood furniture and around 5 to 7 per
cent industrial units are engaged in light engineering and fabrication work.
Around 5 per cent of the industrial units were engaged in manufacture of
shawls and other cotton and woolen products. Production and marketing
of food products accounts for another 15 per cent (Ref. Table-5A). The
responses of the survey are analysed in the following paragraphs.
53 per cent of the respondents feel that being part of a cluster ensures easier
availability of raw materials while 43 per cent feel that it ensures timely
availability. 47 per cent feel that they are able to get a better price as
members of cluster while 56 per cent get advantage of adequate storage.
52 per cent have obtained higher credit limits from banks. (Ref. Table -15)
Marketing
The analysis of the cluster units in respect of marketing products indicates
that more than 50 per cent of the units have reported better facilities as
xlviii
regards identification of markets. Such units in the in the district of
Barabanki are more than 70 per cent, in Unnao they are more than 65 per
cent, in Hardoi around 48 per cent whereas in Gorakhpur such units are
less than 30 per cent. (Ref. Table-17)
Around 50 per cent of the cluster units have reported that clusterization
has enabled the units to obtain a higher sale price for their products and
as a group, they have better bargaining power with the buyers. The
numbers of such units in Gorakhpur and Hardoi are less than 45 per cent
whereas such units in Unnao and Barabanki are more than 50 per cent.
(Ref. Table -17)
xlix
Infrastructure Facilities
For the surveyed units, it appears that about 63 per cent of the responding
units have enough power supply and 85 per cent have reported availability
of continuous supply of power. 52 per cent of the responding units have
indicated availability of power at cheaper rate. Most of the respondents,
however, want further improvement in the
3.5.4 Transport
l
Storage Facilities
Risk Awareness
Small units do not have the information or the expertise to recognize the
short or long term business risks. Around 60 per cent of industrial units in
all the four districts have reported the advantage of clusterization in
creating awareness of risk and ways to get over them. The number of
such units in Barabanki and Hardoi districts are around 80 per cent and in
Gorakhpur district such units are 63 per cent. Number of units reporting
the advantage of creating awareness of risks and ways to get over them in
Unnao district were only 16 per cent which indicates apathy on the part of
the units. (Ref. Table-25)
Technology Upgradation
li
has been the main factor contributing to sickness of the small-scale units.
The resources of the small entrepreneur are, however, inadequate to
properly search for the latest appropriate technology and a suitable
technology provider. Import or local purchase of such technology may be
beyond the reach of an individual small-scale entrepreneur. The
cumulative knowledge and financial resources of the cluster are crucial in
identifying the latest technology and in obtaining the best terms for its
transfer to the members of the cluster desirous of upgradation of their
units. Technology providers, local or foreign, may also be willing to
demonstrate their technologies and provide training in their maintenance
and operation if several members of the cluster desire to have it installed
in their units. Government departments and NGOs may, also find it more
convenient to provide technology upgradation assistance to rural clusters.
Manufacturers could, also be induced to set up semi-urban support bases
to cater to the needs of a number of clusters.
Benefits of assistance in technology upgradation in clusters has been
reported by 57 per cent of the industrial units in all the four districts.
Maximum number of such units were in Barabanki district with 80 per cent
followed by Hardoi 79 per cent and Gorakhpur 51 per cent. (Ref. Table-
25)
Around 38 per cent units have reported the advantage of increasing profit
due to clusterization. Maximum number of such units are 66 per cent in
lii
Hardoi district followed by 40 per cent units in Barabanki and 35 per cent
in Gorakhpur district. Similar to the perception of other advantages in
Unnao district, only 10 per cent units were found reporting increase in
profit due to clusterization. (Ref. Table-25)
3.12.1 This analysis indicates that the units of Unnao district are not getting as
much benefit from clusterisation as the other three. Gorakhpur being the
oldest district in respect of setting up of units, seems to be low in modern
facilities in comparison to Barabanki and Hardoi district where the
clusterization has started recently. The industrial units coming under SSI
cluster are found to have maximum advantage of clusterization in case of
getting assistance for better and economical transport followed by
advantage of getting awareness of risks and ways to get over them.
Getting assistance for obtaining raw material, assistance in obtaining
Government subsidy and assistance in availability of finances for setting
up projects are other advantages of clusterisation.
3.12.2 The handloom sector has obtained the best advantage of clusterisation.
In this sector the maximum number of industrial units obtained the
advantage of assistance in technology upgradation followed by
assistance in obtaining raw materials, assistance in obtaining better and
economic transport and assistance in obtaining Government subsidy.
The handicraft cluster units received the minimum advantage of
clusterisation and only 38 units have reported the advantage of
assistance in obtaining raw materials followed by 34 units each reporting
increase in profits and assistance in obtaining better and economical
transport while 33 units have reported advantage of assista nce in
obtaining government subsidy. (Ref. Table-25)
liii
districts have also indicated obtaining significant advantages of
clusterization but in all cases number of such units in Gorakhpur district is
more than the number of units in Barabanki and Hardoi. Unnao district
does not appear to have taken advantage of clusterisation. (Ref. Table-
25)
While the main driving force for clusterisation is the profit to individual
industrial units, such profit maximization by the units, also, leads to
economical use of national resources. Efficient use of power has been
reported by 43 per cent of the industrial units in all the four districts. This
percentage however, varies from district to district. The maximum
number of units (66 per cent) were reported in Barabanki district for more
efficient power use followed by Gorakhpur with 57 per cent and Hardoi
with 43 per cent. For Unnao only 8 per cent units have reported the same
advantage.
(Ref. Table -26A)
liv
Promoting Innovation And Creativity
Around 39 per cent of the units in all the four district have indicated
advantage of clusterization for promoting innovation and creativity which
make industry more efficient and competitive. In Hardoi district the
number of units reporting such advantages was 57 per cent which was
followed by Barabanki district with 51 per cent and Gorakhpur with 42 per
cent. (Ref. Table -26A)
Conclusion
lv
requirements. Their ability to take risks collectively is also enhanced.
Increase in productivity leads to more efficient and economical use of
resources such as power and water which is a benefit to the national
economy.
lvi
CHAPTER -IV
4.1.1 The advantages of clusterization for the small-scale industries have been
brought out in the previous chapter. Government policies regarding small-
scale industries are increasingly emphasizing formation of clusters.
International agencies like UNIDO are also assisting in cluster formation. It
is, therefore a matter of concern that even with such obvious advantages
and incentives, clusterization has not made adequate progress.
4.1.3 Responses from the owners / managers of 611 units were obtained in the
survey. Meaningful responses regarding problems faced or perceived by
them were received from 436 respondents. These are analysed below.
Constraints Perceived
lvii
take full advantage of government support, incentives, subsidies and
concessionary finance. They also desire substantial improvement in the
infrastructure of power, roads and water supply. They will also like that
common facilities for testing and quality control are established at
government cost. Training needs are also perceived for managers and
skilled workmen. Denial of these facilities or delays in providing them are
perceived as constraints.
Deficiencies of infrastructure
Erratic power supply and poor connectivity (to power grid) have been cited
as the foremost constraints to growth and 184 (42 per cent) respondents
have mentioned this problem. It is felt most keenly in Gorakhpur with 94
(68 per cent) respondents and in Hardoi with 60 (43 per cent)
respondents. It is not felt to that extent in Barabanki and Unnao which
have better infrastructure on account of their proximity to the capital city,
Lucknow and the industrial capital, Kanpur. (Ref. Table-24)
lviii
While interacting with the entrepreneurs, especially of smaller units, the
surveyors felt that they were not fully aware of the facilities offered by the
government to the small-scale sector and its stated policy for encouraging
cluster formation. It was stated that while district level officers do not take
interest in small village level industries, the village level workers neglected
their duties. Such lack of awareness has been reported by 19 respondents
(4 per cent), mainly from Barabanki and Hardoi districts. (Ref. Table-24)
The need for training is keenly felt by the entrepreneurs. The requirements
of training vary for entrepreneurs and managers and for technicians and
skilled workers.
The areas in which entrepreneurs expressed the need for training are as
follows:
i. Upgradation of technology
ii. Obtaining finance
iii. Dealing with market
iv. Energy conservation
lix
The areas in which need for training for managers is perceived are as
follows:
i. Administration
ii. Production
iii. Labour management
iv. Market trends
v. Finance and marketing
vi. Technological upgradation
vii. Quality and cost control
viii. Designs in line with changing tastes and market
requirements
The areas in which training needs are perceived for technicians and
skilled workers are:
The suggestions for improvement flow from the constraints faced by small-
scale units individually and in clusters. The following measures will
improve the viability and profitability of clusters.
lxi
i. Assist entrepreneurs in preparation of feasibility report.
ii. Inform entrepreneurs, specially small ones, about facilities made
available by the government and financing institutions. Dissemination
of such information to clusters through newsletter etc. should be
formalized.
iii. Simplify and liberalize procedures for sanction of loans on single
window concept and in a time bound manner.
iv. Ensure availability of power and water at reasonable rates.
v. Improve communications.
vi. Assist clusters with market information.
vii. Assist clusters in selection of proper technology for upgradation.
viii. R&D for technology improvement / upgradation and availability of R&D
to small entrepreneur.
ix. Provide training facilities focusing on needs of clusters.
4.3.3 The financial and manpower resources of the government are limited and
practically, it is not possible to provide all the assistance needed by all the
small-scale units to remove their bottlenecks and increase their
productivity. It is, therefore, essential to concentrate on the formation and
operation of industrial clusters which should emerge as centres of
excellence. The example of a few successful clusters will induce the other
individual units to come together as clusters and consolidate their strength
through unity.
lxii
4.4.2 The Government of India considers the cluster approach .as important for
the development of small-scale industry including handlooms and
handicrafts. Different government institutions have taken up programmes
for the identification of potential clusters and creating infrastructural
facilities for their formation. While these institutions including D.C. SSI,
KVIC and others have done creditable work, their resources are not
enough to develop the process of clusterisation at a rapid pace. Active
involvement of the banks and financial institutions with their vast
resources and reach in all parts of the country is necessary to give a push
to this programme. Their involvement will also provide additional
resources for clusters being developed by the government institutions and
also assist the establishment and operation of new units.
4.4.5 Banks, financial institutions and private enterprises could also “adopt”
some SSI, handloom or handicraft clusters as a part of their social
responsibility. Their assistance could extend to creating and improving
infrastructure, arranging finance, assistance in marketing etc. An important
element of such assistance will be rendering advice about technology
upgradation and assistance in its procurement.
4.4.6 Banks could also consider priority lending in backward areas and areas
having adverse credit-deposit ratios coordinating with Rashtriya Sam
Vikas Yojana (RSVY).
4.4.8 NGOs having necessary resources could also consider “adopting” some
rural clusters and help them with technical and management advice.
4.5.1 The respondents of the survey are fully aware of the advantages of acting
as parts of clusters, formal or informal. As such, they have valuable ideas
regarding the industrial activities which are most suitable for their
areas/districts and which could be operated as clusters. The respondents,
therefore, were asked to give their views as to the nature of clusters that
they considered viable in their districts. Views of concerned government
officers were also sought. The types of potential clusters considered viable
by them in different districts are given below (ref: Table 27-A and Table
27-B)
lxiv
District Type of potential cluster_________________________
Gorakhpur Agro-based, Rice mill, Mango pulp, Pickles, Mini-sugar
mill, Special handloom products, Power looms
Unnao Agro-based, Mango pulp, Pickles, Chikan, Carpet,
Zari work, Power loom
Barabanki Agro-based, Potato based, Menthol based, Papad,
Rice mill, Agricultural implements, Timber/furniture
Power loom, Terracotta
Hardoi Agro-based, Mango pulp, Potato chips, Juice processing, Small rice
mill, Dairy products, Flour mill, Handloom/Power loom, Children’s
clothing, Carpet weaving, Chikan, Zardosi/ Zari .
4.5.2 The analysis of information reveals that the factors considered important
for setting up clusters of small scale industries are availability of raw
materials, availability of traditional skills, availability of markets and
linkages of their products to other industries as ancilliaries or otherwise.
The dominant activity in the surveyed area being agriculture, horticulture
and dairying, the majority of suggestions are for agro-based industries.
However, availability of avenues of profitable investment in areas other
than agro-processing appears to have weighed also with the respondents
in prioritizing their perceptions of desirable SSI clusters for their areas.
4.5.4 Availability of timber for wooden furniture and wood carving is another
resource for small scale industries. Considering also the availability of
traditional skilled workers, wood based industry and handicrafts have been
suggested by 8 per cent of the respondents in Barabanki district. Similarly,
8 per cent of the respondents have suggested leather industry units in
Unnao district which has a number of large scale leather factories and
tanneries. The small-scale leather based units there can have easier
access to raw materials and processing and could also avail benefits of
ancilliarisation to some extent.
lxvi
respondents in Unnao district have suggested chemical industry as a
potential industry.
4.5.6 The above suggestions are based on the personal knowledge and
experience of entrepreneurs and government officers working in the
small industries set up. They could be helpful in identifying new projects
that could be taken up in the area. A decision to take up a project will,
obviously depend upon a thorough study of its technical and financial
viability.
lxvii
CHAPTER -V
lxviii
backgrounds. The economics of agglomeration ensures a network of
suppliers for providing raw materials, equipment, machinery, spares,
repair and other services to units. Clusters encourage specialization in
manufacturing processes, inter-firm relationships in production activities
and sharing of information. Common facilities for product testing, quality
control, transport and storage of products, pollution control, power, water
and communication facilities can also be made available more
conveniently to clusters rather than individual units. The clusters can
engage in joint activities such as promotion, transportation and training
which lowers the cost per unit of carrying out these functions. The clusters
become information and knowledge networks creating efficiency and
innovation making them responsive to market needs. Clusters provide the
ability to take collective risks for developing new products and entering
distant and international markets.
5.2.3 A package for encouraging the SSI sector was announced by the Prime
Minister on 30th August 2000. Some important measures taken thereafter
are as follows.
5.3.1 The main objective of promoting SSIs is their high employment potential.
The further advantage is that this employment is dispersed and benefits
rural and backward areas.
5.3.2 The growth of employment in the SSI sector during the period 2001-02
has been estimated in the Economic Survey as 4.4 per cent. The
employment growth in the surveyed units is higher at 5.1 per cent for
about the same period.
lxx
5.3.3 An encouraging feature of the employment scenario in the surveyed units
is that about 45 per cent of the employment is for technical persons. It
implies that unit owners are realizing the value of quality production which
can be achieved only by employing properly qualified technical persons
which would include technicians and skilled workmen.
5.3.5 The Economic Survey has estimated the total employment in the SSI
sector during 2004-05 as 282.82 lakhs. The average growth rate for the
year has been estimated as 4.2 per cent. It would be reasonable to
assume that with a policy of actively encouraging clusterisation in SSIs,
the rate of growth of employment should rise to 4.5 per cent annually .It is
5.1 per cent as observed in the surveyed units. With 4.5 per cent growth
rate, the SSI sector has a potential of providing additional employment to
12.72 lakhs persons annually.
5.4.1 The survey indicates that the SSI entrepreneurs are generally satisfied
with the government policies. The suggestions for reduction in taxes and
duties, reduction of electricity tariffs, end of inspector raj, end of corruption
etc. are demands which are commonly known and would apply to sectors
other than SSI sector also. The complaint of the entrepreneurs is against
delay, red-tapism, harassment and corruption.
5.4.2 The benefits of clusterisation are fully realized by the entrepreneurs. Local
groups of SSI units forming informal clusters already exist. Government
assistance is needed to make these clusters effective. The present
schemes for assistance to clusters are very inadequate. There has to be
lxxi
manifold increase in providing infrastructure of roads, power and water
and provision of common facilities of testing, quality and significant R&D
support specifically designed to assist particular types of clusters adopting
a sectoral approach.
5.4.3 The overall allocation for SSI and VSI sector has not kept pace with the
needs of this sector. These allocations have to be stepped up in view of
the crucial importance of the SSI sector for generating employment and
promoting exports at low capital cost.
5.4.5 Lack of technically trained manpower has been cited as a constraint. This
could be taken care of by having properly designed courses of study to
suit the manpower requirements of the clusters at the nearby Industrial
Training Institutes.
5.4.6 Raw material banks could be set up for specific clusters such as
handlooms, power looms, sericulture etc.
lxxii
5.6 De-reservation
5.8 Recommendations
Based upon our interactions with respondents and knowledgeable
persons, we consider the following recommendations as essential for the
lxxiii
expeditious development of rural small industries clusters and for their
efficient functioning.
(iv) Training
lxxv
Modern testing facilities and quality certification laboratories, at
least one in each district/ cluster should be provided (if not
provided already) by the Ministry of SSI / in association with State
Governments. The utilisation of these facilities should be maximum
and SSI units should be encouraged to take their full advantage in
improving the quality of their products. (Action: Ministry of SSI /
State Government / SSI units).
lxxvi
(x) Establishment of new clusters
5.9.1 The Government of India and the State Governments have been actively
assisting the SSI sector through policy initiatives and financial support
through various programmes. To achieve the benefits of these
programmes fo rmation of clusters of interlinked firms collaborating
technologically and strategically, which was a desirable option in the past,
has become an urgent necessity now. Clusterisation leads to efficiency in
terms of resource use and in promoting inter-industry and inter-sectoral
linkages contributing significantly to the economic growth and prosperity of
the region.
5.9.2 Clusters benefit from a high degree of horizontal linkages in the form of
collaboration between firms forming part of the cluster and vertical
linkages between suppliers, manufacturers and distributors. Suppliers,
trading agents and financiers are attracted to geographical and sectoral
lxxvii
concentration of firms which reduces their exposure to risks enabling them
to offer better terms to their clients. The clusters, collectively, generate
more experiential knowledge about the industry than individual units could
do. Industry trends and technical innovations can be communicated
quickly between firms in a cluster. Greater levels of social cohesion and
community connections shared between people involved in geographic
clusters facilitate cooperation and collective action. Clusters can engage in
joint activities of transportation, training, seeking orders and utilizing
marketing channels for exports at much reduced cost per unit. Owners
can upgrade the technology of their units at substantially lower cost by
utilizing the experience of other units in the cluster.
5.9.3 Small scale industries policy should aim to connect isolated rural and
semi urban communities to the global market through development of
industrial clusters. This should be treated as an important economic
growth strategy for our country’s small scale industrial sector. Our
economy needs to create millions of jobs every year to keep pace with
our increasing workforce. For a large labour surplus economy as ours
small business should be encouraged as parts of ‘clusters’. This will open
the door to link India’s small entrepreneurs to the wider global economy.
5.9.4 In its new programme initiatives for industrialisaiton the 10th Five Year
Plan has prepared a scheme for cluster development of the small scale
sector. Department of industry, Policy and Promotion under the Ministry of
Commerce and Industry is its nodal agency for monitoring and
implementation. The scheme aims to pickup the industrial cluster with high
growth potential. The State Govt. must take advantage of the scheme and
create suitable pockets for conducive growth of existing units of all types
in the form of vertical cluster. If advantage of the scheme is properly
utilized the SSI units can be converted into a dynamic and competitive
cluster.
5.9.5 Five decades of industrial development in India has seen many changes
occurring in small medium and large industries. Now it is becoming quite
lxxviii
clear that in days to come India will have to focus on its competitive and
compatible advantages in areas like agriculture, dairy products,
biotechnology, environment etc. It is high time for us to focus our attention
towards these areas and effective techno logy. It must be realized that
rural raw material, whether from agriculture, horticulture, forest, fisheries,
minerals, herbs, food & food products etc could be some of the promising
industries which could be setup in the rural and semi-urban areas as
‘Cluster’ with a suitable technology and proper policy packages as
available. India has a rich heritage of artisans and they are in various
areas like handloom, powerlooms, leather, pottery, paper making, herbs,
stone carving, construction and water management etc. Of late even
service sector has been included in the list of rural industries. These areas
are considered potential areas for clusterisation; and such areas should
be taken into active consideration while formulating policies and
programmes for cluster development in rural/semi-urban areas.
lxxix
REFERENCES
lxxx
Table 1. Districtwise Distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by year of establishment
SSI 3 1 5 21 23 53
HANDLOOM 0 3 2 5 5 15
HANDICRAFT 0 1 1 13 17 32
OTHER 20 2 5 16 11 54
Total 23 7 13 55 56 154
GORAKHPUR
SSI 41 11 17 31 18 118
HANDLOOM 2 0 0 2 0 4
OTHER 25 0 0 2 1 28
Total 68 11 17 35 19 150
BARABANKI
SSI 2 5 8 23 29 67
HANDLOOM 15 11 8 8 5 47
OTHER 17 3 2 9 9 40
Total 34 19 18 40 43 154
HARDOI
SSI 4 9 7 17 21 58
HANDLOOM 7 3 3 3 0 16
HANDICRAFT 1 1 8 18 15 43
OTHER 18 2 0 9 7 36
Total 30 15 18 47 43 153
ALL CLUSTERS
SSI 50 26 37 92 91 296
% 32 50 56 52 57 48
HANDLOOM 24 17 13 18 10 82
% 15 33 20 10 6 13
HANDICRAFT 1 2 9 31 32 75
% 1 4 14 18 20 12
OTHER 80 7 7 36 28 158
% 52 13 11 20 17 26
G.Total 155 52 66 177 161 611
71
Table 2. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by type of activity
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
HANDLOOM
Manufacturing 10 3 46 16 75
Processing 5 1 1 0 7
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
Manufacturing 3 0 0 21 24
Processing 26 0 0 22 48
Service Providers 3 0 0 0 3
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
Manufacturing 16 4 24 7 51
Processing 21 0 1 6 28
Service Providers 1 0 1 4 6
Others 16 24 14 19 73
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
Manufacturing 67 117 130 85 399
% 44 78 84 56 65
Processing 62 5 9 35 111
% 40 3 6 23 18
Service Providers 9 3 1 14 27
% 6 2 1 9 4
Others 16 25 14 19 74
% 10 17 9 12 12
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
72
Table 3. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by type of ownership
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
Self Entrepreneurship / Household unit 23 111 18 4 156
Partnership firm 8 3 3 1 15
Proprietorship 17 0 45 53 115
Company 5 2 1 0 8
No Response 0 2 0 0 2
Total 53 118 67 58 296
HANDLOOM
Self Entrepreneurship / Household unit 10 4 31 0 45
Proprietorship 5 0 16 16 37
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
Self Entrepreneurship / Household unit 26 0 0 11 37
Partnership firm 2 0 0 0 2
Proprietorship 4 0 0 32 36
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
Self Entrepreneurship / Household unit 18 4 7 6 35
Partnership firm 1 0 2 0 3
Proprietorship 19 0 17 11 47
No Response 16 24 14 19 73
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
Self Entrepreneurship / Household unit 77 119 56 21 273
% 50 79 36 14 45
Partnership firm 11 3 5 1 20
% 7 2 3 1 3
Proprietorship 45 0 78 112 235
% 29 0 51 73 38
Company 5 2 1 0 8
% 3 1 1 0 1
No Response 16 26 14 19 75
% 10 17 9 12 12
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
73
Table 4. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type
of cluster and by use of power
HANDLOOM
< 5 KVA 2 2 5 0 9
5 -10 KVA 1 1 1 0 3
10 - 20 KVA 1 0 1 0 2
Not Using power 11 1 40 16 68
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
< 5 KVA 5 0 0 0 5
5 -10 KVA 2 0 0 0 2
Not Using power 25 0 0 43 68
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
< 5 KVA 14 4 3 3 24
5 -10 KVA 4 0 15 3 22
10 - 20 KVA 2 0 1 0 3
20 - 50 KVA 4 0 0 0 4
>50 1 0 0 1 2
Not Using power 29 24 21 29 103
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
< 5 KVA 32 93 17 24 166
% 21 62 11 16 27
5 -10 KVA 10 27 40 22 99
% 6 18 26 14 16
10 - 20 KVA 10 1 12 6 29
% 6 1 8 4 5
20 - 50 KVA 9 0 3 0 12
% 6 0 2 0 2
>50 13 0 7 1 21
% 8 0 5 1 3
Not Using power 80 29 75 100 284
% 52 19 49 65 46
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
74
Table 5A. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of clusterand
by major products / service
SSl UNNAO GORAK BARABA HARDOI TOTAL
HPUR NKI
AGRICULTURE IMPLEMENTS &
CULTIVATION 0 0 3 1 4
ANGOCHA, TOWEL 0 0 10 0 10
BATTERIES WORKS (MAKING &
SUPPLY) 2 0 0 0 2
BED COVER, SHEETS, PILLOW, DHOTI
OTHER CLOTHS 2 17 1 7
BOTTLE (AMPLE) 2 0 0 0 2
BRICK 4 0 2 0 6
CARPET 0 0 0 2 2
CHATAI 0 0 0 1 1
CUSHION 0 0 0 6 6
DYEING & PRINTING 3 0 1 2 6
ENGG. WORK 0 3 0 2 5
FABRICATION WORK 1 3 15 24 43
FLOUR 1 0 4 1 6
FOOD PRODUCTS 17 0 17 9 43
HANKY 0 0 2 0 2
KURTA 0 0 0 1 1
LEATHER WORKS 2 1 0 0 3
LUNGI 0 1 8 0 9
PAINT 1 31 0 0 32
PHARMACEUTICAL 2 0 0 0 2
POLYBAG 0 0 1 0 1
REPAIRING 0 0 0 5 5
ROTATORS 0 0 0 2 2
RUMAL 0 0 3 0 3
SCARP 0 0 1 0 1
SHIRT 0 2 0 0 2
SHOE SOLE 1 0 0 0 1
SHAWL PRODUCT 0 42 0 0 42
STATIONARY, PRINTING,
ADVERTISEMENT PRINTING 6 1 5 14 26
STEEL ALMIRAH & OTHER WORKS 4 3 3 3 13
TERRACOTTA WORKS 0 3 0 0 3
THAN 0 0 3 0 3
TRACTOR, TROLLEY , WAGON 8 0 14 7 29
TRUCK 1 0 0 3 4
TUBE, TILES 0 0 1 0 1
WOOD FURNITURE 8 34 35 46 123
ZARI, CHICKAN WORK & SAREES 3 0 3 2 8
OTHER 0 0 1 0 1
TOTAL 68 141 133 138 480
HANDLOOM
ANGOCHA, TOWEL 4 0 66 24 94
Table 5A. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of clusterand
by major products / service
% 19 0 1 19 10
OTHER 1 0 1 1 3
% 1 0 0 0 0
GRAND TOTAL 173 150 294 282 900
Note : Some units have more than one product therefore total may not tally
Table 5B.Districtwise distribution of sampled units by
type of cluster and by production activity of the unit
Handloom 0 0 4 0 4
Powerloom 0 40 8 0 48
Handmade paper 1 1 0 0 2
Printing 2 0 0 4 6
Leather 1 0 0 0 1
Carpet Weaving 0 1 0 0 1
Bamboo Craft 0 0 1 1 2
Zari 1 0 2 1 4
Beadwork 1 0 0 1 2
Pottery 0 0 1 1 2
Terracotta 0 43 0 0 43
Metal-work 5 1 2 11 19
Lathe 1 0 0 13 14
Engineering 6 5 2 4 17
Wood Carving 3 8 1 1 13
Carpentry 3 13 9 7 32
Other 29 6 37 14 86
Total 53 118 67 58 296
HANDLOOM
Handloom 10 1 39 16 66
Powerloom 0 0 1 0 1
Zari 0 0 2 0 2
Beadwork 0 0 4 0 4
Terracotta 0 1 0 0 1
Other 5 2 1 0 8
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
Carpet Weaving 0 0 0 19 19
Zari 14 0 0 12 26
Other 18 0 0 12 30
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
Handloom 1 0 1 1 3
Powerloom 1 3 11 0 15
Printing 2 0 2 3 7
Leather 1 0 0 0 1
79
Table 5B.Districtwise distribution of sampled units by
type of cluster and by production activity of the unit
80
Table 5B.Districtwise distribution of sampled units by
type of cluster and by production activity of the unit
81
Table 6. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by fixed capital (Rs. In lakhs)
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
<5 32 106 46 58 242
5 -10 5 5 9 0 19
10 - 20 3 5 3 0 11
20 - 50 4 1 2 0 7
50-100 8 1 2 0 11
>100 1 0 5 0 6
Total 53 118 67 58 296
HANDLOOM
<5 14 4 46 16 80
5 -10 0 0 1 0 1
10 - 20 1 0 0 0 1
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
<5 30 0 0 43 73
5 -10 2 0 0 0 2
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
<5 46 27 37 35 145
5 -10 6 1 3 0 10
50-100 2 0 0 1 3
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
<5 122 137 129 152 540
% 79 91 84 99 88
5 -10 13 6 13 0 32
% 8 4 8 0 5
10 - 20 4 5 3 0 12
% 3 3 2 0 2
20 - 50 4 1 2 0 7
% 3 1 1 0 1
50-100 10 1 2 1 14
% 6 1 1 1 2
>100 1 0 5 0 6
% 1 0 3 0 1
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
82
Table 7. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by
type of cluster and by working capital(Rs. In lakhs)
HANDLOOM
<2 13 4 45 14 76
2-5 1 0 0 1 2
5 - 10 1 0 2 1 4
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
<2 28 0 0 43 71
2-5 3 0 0 0 3
5 - 10 1 0 0 0 1
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
<2 41 28 35 34 138
2-5 5 0 3 1 9
5 - 10 5 0 2 1 8
10 - 20 1 0 0 0 1
20- 50 1 0 0 0 1
>50 1 0 0 0 1
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
<2 110 141 125 146 522
% 71 94 81 95 85
2-5 15 4 5 5 29
% 10 3 3 3 5
5 - 10 10 1 15 2 28
% 6 1 10 1 5
10 - 20 4 0 1 0 5
% 3 0 1 0 1
20- 50 6 1 1 0 8
% 4 1 1 0 1
>50 9 3 7 0 19
% 6 2 5 0 3
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
83
Table 8. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of
cluster and by output (Rs. In lakhs)
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
<5 36 100 49 57 242
5 - 10 3 13 6 1 23
10 - 20 3 3 3 0 9
20 - 50 7 1 2 0 10
50- 100 1 1 0 0 2
>100 3 0 7 0 10
Total 53 118 67 58 296
HANDLOOM
<5 11 4 47 14 76
5 - 10 2 0 0 0 2
20 - 50 2 0 0 2 4
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
<5 25 0 0 40 65
5 - 10 5 0 0 3 8
20 - 50 2 0 0 0 2
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
<5 40 28 38 34 140
5 - 10 6 0 2 2 10
10 - 20 4 0 0 0 4
20 - 50 3 0 0 0 3
50- 100 1 0 0 0 1
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
<5 112 132 134 145 523
% 73 88 87 95 86
5 - 10 16 13 8 6 43
% 10 9 5 4 7
10 - 20 7 3 3 0 13
% 5 2 2 0 2
20 - 50 14 1 2 2 19
% 9 1 1 1 3
50- 100 2 1 0 0 3
% 1 1 0 0 0
>100 3 0 7 0 10
% 2 0 5 0 2
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
84
Table 9.Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of
cluster and by size of employment
SIZE UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
<5 16 35 16 39 105
5–9 19 65 35 19 138
10 – 19 10 17 13 0 40
20 – 49 5 1 1 0 7
>=50 3 0 2 0 5
Total 53 118 67 58 296
HANDLOOM
<5 7 2 20 3 32
5–9 2 2 26 10 40
10 – 19 3 0 1 1 5
20-49 3 0 0 0 3
>=50 0 0 0 2 2
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
<5 11 0 0 28 39
5–9 10 0 0 12 22
10 – 19 6 0 0 3 9
20-49 4 0 0 0 4
>=50 1 0 0 0 1
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
<5 39 27 22 29 117
5–9 11 0 14 6 31
10 – 19 4 0 0 0 4
20 – 49 1 0 0 1 2
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
<5 73 64 58 99 294
% 47 43 38 65 48
5 – 10 42 67 75 47 231
% 27 45 49 31 38
10 – 19 22 18 18 4 62
% 14 12 12 3 10
20 – 49 13 1 1 1 16
% 8 1 1 1 3
>=50 4 0 2 2 8
% 3 0 1 1 1
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
84
Table 10A. Districtwise distribution of employees as on 31st March 2001 by type of
cluster and by category and sex.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE
SSI
Technical Persons 172 0 462 109 271 7 99 2 1004 118
Contract
Employees 243 70 120 0 110 3 6 0 479 73
Dailywage
Workers 172 37 30 0 108 11 55 0 365 48
Family Workers 40 0 291 144 39 10 36 4 406 158
Total 627 107 903 253 528 31 196 6 2254 397
HANDLOOM
Technical Persons 44 5 14 2 99 60 137 59 294 126
Contract
Employees 28 6 6 0 17 1 75 25 126 32
Dailywage
Workers 18 9 0 0 52 34 46 32 116 75
Family Workers 14 11 8 2 31 29 9 2 62 44
Total 104 31 28 4 199 124 267 118 598 277
HANDICRAFT
Technical Persons 107 47 0 0 0 0 125 32 232 79
Contract
Employees 14 36 0 0 0 0 59 0 73 36
Dailywage
Workers 15 10 0 0 0 0 42 21 57 31
Family Workers 13 17 0 0 0 0 34 12 47 29
Total 149 110 0 0 0 0 260 65 409 175
OTHER
Technical Persons 87 4 9 2 75 13 51 0 222 19
Contract
Employees 4 3 3 0 19 1 13 0 39 4
Dailywage
Workers 44 17 0 0 32 0 35 0 111 17
Family Workers 36 0 6 4 32 10 11 1 85 15
Total 171 24 18 6 158 24 110 1 457 55
ALL CLUSTERS
Technical Persons 410 56 485 113 445 80 412 93 1752 342
% 39 21 51 43 50 45 49 49 47 38
Contract
Employees 289 115 129 0 146 5 153 25 717 145
% 27 42 14 0 16 3 18 13 19 16
Dailywage
Workers 249 73 30 0 192 45 178 53 649 171
% 24 27 3 0 22 25 21 28 17 19
Family Workers 103 28 305 150 102 49 90 19 600 246
G.Total 1051 272 949 263 885 179 833 190 3718 904
86
Table 10B. Districtwise distribution of employees as on 31st March 2001 by type of cluster
and by production activity of unit and sex
87
Table 10B. Districtwise distribution of employees as on 31st March 2001 by type of cluster
and by production activity of unit and sex
88
Table 11A. Districtwise distribution of employees as on 31st August 2004 by type of
cluster and by category and sex
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE
SSI
Technical Persons 180 2 552 128 320 8 132 2 1184 140
Contract Employees 275 60 131 0 140 5 5 0 551 65
Daily wage Workers 201 35 55 5 116 15 86 0 458 55
Family Workers 42 1 362 171 52 10 32 4 488 186
Total 698 98 1100 304 628 38 255 6 2681 446
HANDLOOM
Technical Persons 65 9 15 3 107 65 169 72 356 149
Contract Employees 28 7 6 0 23 1 81 25 138 33
Daily wage Workers 31 5 0 0 54 35 78 44 163 84
Family Workers 16 8 9 3 39 36 7 3 71 50
Total 140 29 30 6 223 137 335 144 728 316
HANDICRAFT
Technical Persons 125 73 0 0 0 0 149 25 274 98
Contract Employees 36 37 0 0 0 0 58 0 94 37
Daily wage Workers 26 20 0 0 0 0 61 17 87 37
Family Workers 26 24 0 0 0 0 37 10 63 34
Total 213 154 0 0 0 0 305 52 518 206
OTHER
Technical Persons 91 5 12 0 90 15 62 0 255 20
Contract Employees 4 4 4 0 30 2 13 0 51 6
Daily wage Workers 49 21 0 0 44 0 43 0 136 21
Family Workers 38 0 8 10 36 11 11 0 93 21
Total 182 30 24 10 200 28 129 0 535 68
AL ALL CLUSTERS
Technical Persons 461 89 579 131 517 88 512 99 2069 407
% 37 29 50 41 49 43 50 49 46 39
Contract Employees 343 108 141 0 193 8 157 25 834 141
% 28 35 12 0 18 4 15 12 19 14
Daily wage Workers 307 81 55 5 214 50 268 61 844 197
% 25 26 5 2 20 25 26 30 19 19
Family Workers 122 33 379 184 127 57 87 17 715 291
% 10 11 33 58 12 28 8 8 16 28
G.Total 1233 311 1154 320 1051 203 1024 202 4462 1036
89
Table 11B. Districtwise distribution of employees as on 31st August 2004 by type of
cluster and by production activity of unit and sex
90
Table 11B. Districtwise distribution of employees as on 31st August 2004 by type of
cluster and by production activity of unit and sex
Wood Carving 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0
Carpentry 27 2 8 0 47 0 0 0 82 2
Other 90 25 0 0 24 3 29 0 143 28
Total 182 30 24 10 200 28 129 0 535 68
ALL CLUSTERS
Handloom 114 26 4 0 204 106 340 144 662 276
% 9 8 0 0 19 52 33 71 15 27
Powerloom 4 0 407 81 173 41 0 0 584 122
% 0 0 35 25 16 20 0 0 13 12
Handmade paper 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 6 1
% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Printing 24 2 0 0 8 0 23 0 55 2
% 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0
Leather 95 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 12
% 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
Carpet Weaving 0 0 24 0 0 0 109 34 133 34
% 0 0 2 0 0 0 11 17 3 3
Bamboo Craft 0 0 0 0 8 4 4 4 12 8
% 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
Zari 126 70 0 0 32 9 178 5 336 84
% 10 23 0 0 3 4 17 2 8 8
Beadwork 7 0 0 0 17 24 3 0 27 24
% 1 0 0 0 2 12 0 0 1 2
Herbal/Tulsi 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0
% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pottery 5 0 0 0 35 3 9 0 49 3
% 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 1 0
Terracotta 0 0 389 216 0 0 0 0 389 216
% 0 0 34 68 0 0 0 0 9 21
Metal-work 26 0 6 0 16 0 44 0 92 0
% 2 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 2 0
Lathe 9 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 71 0
% 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0
Engineering 41 0 36 0 27 0 22 0 126 0
% 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 3 0
% 2 0 7 0 1 0 1 0 3 0
% 3 2 12 0 10 1 2 0 7 1
% 58 63 6 7 40 6 19 7 31 24
G. Total 1233 311 1154 320 1051 203 1024 202 4462 1036
91
Table 12A. Districtwise capital/labour ratio by type of cluster
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
92
Table 13. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
registration/affiliation with Association
HANDLOOM
Manufacture 3 0 0 0 3
Not affiliated but desire to form association 7 4 40 14 65
Not affiliated and do not need any association 5 0 7 2 14
Total 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
Manufacture 1 0 0 0 1
Trading 1 0 0 0 1
Not affiliated but desire to form association 24 0 0 39 63
Not affiliated and do not need any association 6 0 0 4 10
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
Manufacture 5 0 1 0 6
Service 1 0 0 0 1
Not affiliated but desire to form association 20 4 21 13 58
Not affiliated and do not need any association 28 24 18 23 93
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
Manufacture 24 2 1 0 27
% 16 1 1 0 4
Trading 1 0 0 0 1
% 1 0 0 0 0
Service 3 0 0 0 3
% 2 0 0 0 0
Not affiliated but desire to form association 77 99 116 116 408
% 50 66 75 76 67
Not affiliated and do not need any association 49 49 37 37 172
% 32 33 24 24 28
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
93
Table 14A. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by getting better facilities (Power Connection)
SSI
HANDLOOM
Enough Power 3 4 18 9 34
Cheaper Rate 2 1 39 12 54
Continuance of power 5 3 42 12 62
Total 9 4 44 12 69
HANDICRAFT
Enough Power 10 0 0 40 50
Cheaper Rate 5 0 0 36 41
Continuance of power 18 0 0 41 59
Total 25 0 0 41 66
OTHER
Enough Power 20 4 12 16 52
Cheaper Rate 10 1 17 12 40
Continuance of power 16 4 22 16 58
Total 34 4 26 16 80
ALL CLUSTERS
Enough Power 47 114 54 95 310
% 40 93 42 79 63
Cheaper Rate 24 39 90 103 256
% 20 32 70 86 52
Continuance of power 70 112 116 120 418
% 59 91 91 100 85
G.Total 118 123 128 120 489
Note: Only responding units have been analysed and therefore total may not tally
94
Table 14B. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by getting better facilities (Water)
SSI
HANDLOOM
Enough Water 3 3 2 6 14
Cheaper Rate 0 1 11 8 20
Continuance of Water 4 1 13 8 26
Total 7 3 15 9 34
HANDICRAFT
Enough Water 6 0 0 20 26
Cheaper Rate 1 0 0 15 16
Continuance of Water 10 0 0 23 33
Total 19 0 0 23 42
OTHER
Enough Water 8 4 3 10 25
Cheaper Rate 7 0 6 9 22
Continuance of Water 15 4 13 10 42
Total 22 4 15 12 53
ALL CLUSTERS
Enough Water 34 111 22 45 212
% 41 91 25 73 60
Cheaper Rate 10 17 49 41 117
% 12 14 56 66 33
Continuance of Water 47 103 71 58 279
% 57 84 81 94 79
G.Total 82 122 88 62 354
Note : Only responding units have been analysed and therefore total may not tally
96
Table 14C. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by getting better facilities (Use of Internal Roads)
Note: Only responding units have been analysed and therefore total may not tally
96
Table 15. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by reporting advantage
of being part of cluster in availability of raw material
Note: Cluster units have reported more than one advantage and therefore total may not tally
97
Table 16. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
quality control facilities in cluster
HANDLOOM
HANDICRAFT
OTHER
ALL CLUSTERS
Better Quality control 47 0 52 44 143
% 31 0 34 29 23
Facilities for test laboratories at reasonable price 12 0 0 0 12
% 8 0 0 0 2
Facility for quality certification 24 1 1 1 27
% 16 1 1 1 4
No quality control system 130 149 153 152 584
% 84 99 99 99 96
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
Note: Cluster units has shown more than one characteristic and therefore total may not tally
98
Table 17. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by reporting
advantages of being part of cluster in marketing of products
99
Table 17. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by reporting
advantages of being part of cluster in marketing of products
% 60 31 68 48 52
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
100
Table 18A. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for entrepreneurs
SSI
HANDLOOM
101
Table 18A. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for entrepreneurs
HANDICRAFT
Total 31 0 0 43 74
102
Table 18A. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for entrepreneurs
OTHER
Total 33 4 26 17 80
ALL CLUSTER
103
Table 18A. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for entrepreneurs
% 0 3 0 2 1
ABOUT BUSINESS IMPROVING POLICY AND 9 0 0 0 9
PROGRAME
% 7 0 0 0 2
TRAINING OF QUALITY MAINTAINANCE OF 7 0 4 6 17
PRODUCT,FINANCING & CLIENT DEALING
% 6 0 3 5 3
% 0 0 0 1 0
YES,TRAINING REQUIRED FOR PRODUCTION 7 1 11 2 21
FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATION.
% 6 1 8 2 4
% 72 44 26 30 43
Note: Only responding units have been analysed and therefore total may not tally
104
Table 18B. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by training needs for managers
SSI
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT . 1 0 1 7 9
HANDLOOM
105
Table 18B. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by training needs for managers
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT . 0 0 1 3 4
TOTAL 5 3 41 16 65
HANDICRAFT
OTHER
106
Table 18B. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by training needs for managers
ALL CLUSTERS
% 0 10 6 7 7
SHORT TRAINING ABOUT PRODUCT 1 2 3 11 17
AND MARKET
% 2 3 3 12 5
107
Table 18B. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by training needs for managers
% 2 0 0 0 0
COST EFFICIENCY BETTER 1 0 0 0 1
MANAGEMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION
% 2 0 0 0 0
% 5 0 0 0 1
% 2 0 1 0 1
% 0 0 1 0 0
108
Table 18B. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and
by training needs for managers
MANAGEMENT OF PRODUCTION 0 1 2 0 3
% 0 1 2 0 1
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT . 1 0 4 10 15
% 2 0 4 11 5
Note: Only responding units have been analysed therefore total may not tally
109
Table 18C. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for skilled workers
SSI
110
Table 18C. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for skilled workers
HANDLOOM
111
Table 18C. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for skilled workers
HANDICRAFT
NO TRAINING REQUIRED 4 0 0 1 5
OTHER
TRAINING OF QUALITY MAINTENANCE & 0 2 6 5 13
ABOUT NEW MACHINERY
TRAINING ABOUT NEW & UPGRADED 1 1 3 1 6
TECHNOLOGIES
INITIAL TRAINING FOR SKILLS 2 1 1 0 4
ABOUT NEW DESIGN MACHINES 2 0 0 1 3
SHOULD BE GIVEN TO TECHNICIANS
112
Table 18C. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for skilled workers
% 12 25 2 2 9
ABOUT NEW DESIGN MACHINES 5 0 6 19 30
SHOULD BE GIVEN TO TECHNICIANS
% 9 0 5 21 9
TRAINING ABOUT POWER 0 0 3 1 4
CONSERVATION
% 0 0 3 1 1
113
Table 18C. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for skilled workers
% 3 0 2 4 2
% 5 0 0 0 1
% 0 0 4 1 1
% 26 3 11 2 9
POWERLOOM TRAINING WITH THE 0 0 4 1 5
HELP OF SKILLED TECHNICIANS OF BIG
INDUSTRIES
% 0 0 4 1 1
RELATED TO SHEET METAL WORKS, 5 1 3 0 9
DESIGNING WORKS AND TRAINING
% 9 1 3 0 3
114
Table 18C. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
training needs for skilled workers
REPAIRING TRAINING 1 0 0 0 1
% 2 0 0 0 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
Note: Only responding units have been analysed and therefore total may not tally
115
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
SSI
116
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
117
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
HANDLOOM
118
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
HANDICRAFT
119
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
120
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
OTHER
121
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF 6 1 1 2 10
WORKERS
KNOWLEDGE OF DEMANDS OF WORLD 0 0 2 0 2
CLASS MARKET AND MODERN
TECHNOLOGY
LABOUR TRAINING 0 0 1 0 1
122
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
ALL CLUSTERS
123
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
DIVERSIFICATION 20 7 19 26 72
% 16 6 14 19 14
INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF 21 4 8 4 37
WORKERS
% 17 3 6 3 7
124
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
LABOUR TRAINING 1 0 1 0 2
% 1 0 1 0 0
% 0 0 2 0 1
% 1 0 2 1 1
% 5 0 1 0 1
125
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
% 6 6 2 6 5
% 1 0 0 0 0
126
Table 19. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster
and by suggestions for improving quality
% 2 0 2 1 1
127
Table 20. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
suggestions for reducing cost.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
BETTER MANAGEMENT 0 0 2 0 2
DIVERSIFICATION 46 80 49 50 225
UPGRADATION OF TECHNOLOGIES, 30 16 16 8 70
MARKETS AND PRODUCTS SUIT TO
CHANGING MARKET REQUIREMENTS
WAYS TO INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY 0 0 1 0 1
HANDLOOM
DIVERSIFICATION 11 2 36 14 63
INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF 7 3 31 7 48
WORKERS.
128
Table 20. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
suggestions for reducing cost.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
HANDICRAFT
DIVERSIFICATION 25 0 0 26 51
INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF 18 0 0 37 55
WORKERS.
OTHER
BETTER MANAGEMENT 0 0 1 0 1
DIVERSIFICATION 28 3 16 13 60
129
Table 20. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
suggestions for reducing cost.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF 21 1 15 10 47
WORKERS.
ALL CLUSTERS
% 1 0 1 0 1
BETTER MANAGEMENT 0 0 3 0 3
% 0 0 2 0 1
% 2 2 3 0 2
% 80 69 73 77 75
% 23 5 35 35 25
% 59 52 45 58 54
130
Table 20. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
suggestions for reducing cost.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 1 0 0 0 0
% 29 58 31 23 35
% 0 0 1 0 0
131
Table 21. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
role of Panchayati Raj Institutions for cluster development
SSI
132
Table 21. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
role of Panchayati Raj Institutions for cluster development
HANDLOOM
133
Table 21. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
role of Panchayati Raj Institutions for cluster development
TOTAL 15 4 47 16 82
HANDICRAFT
134
Table 21. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
role of Panchayati Raj Institutions for cluster development
Total 32 0 0 43 75
OTHER
135
Table 21. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
role of Panchayati Raj Institutions for cluster development
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 3 1 7 12 6
136
Table 21. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
role of Panchayati Raj Institutions for cluster development
% 1 0 0 0 0
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 0 1 2 2 1
% 0 10 0 0 2
% 0 0 1 5 2
% 1 0 0 0 0
% 1 0 6 7 4
% 0 3 2 1 2
137
Table 21. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
role of Panchayati Raj Institutions for cluster development
% 2 0 3 3 2
% 0 3 0 0 1
138
Table 21. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
role of Panchayati Raj Institutions for cluster development
% 0 0 5 3 2
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 1 0 2 3 1
% 1 0 0 0 0
NO ROLE 87 27 50 46 210
% 56 18 32 30 34
139
Table 22. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
problems faced being a part of cluster
Note: All units did not respond and some units have indicated more than one problem, therefore total may not tally
140
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
141
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
TOTAL 3 88 40 37 168
HANDLOOM
142
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
TOTAL 4 2 26 9 41
HANDICRAFT
TOTAL 2 0 0 36 38
143
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
OTHER
144
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
TOTAL 15 12 25 21 73
ALL CLUSTERS
% 8 14 25 27 21
% 4 23 0 0 8
145
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 4 1 16 5 7
% 0 0 10 13 7
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 0 16 2 0 6
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
146
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 3 0 0 1
% 0 1 0 0 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 2 0 0 1
% 0 2 0 0 1
% 0 0 0 3 1
% 0 0 2 0 1
% 8 0 0 0 1
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 4 0 0 0 0
147
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 21 2 0 2 3
% 4 0 0 0 0
LACK OF PROPER KNOWLEDGE OF UPGRADING 0 4 1 0 5
TECHNOLOGY
% 0 4 1 0 2
% 4 1 0 0 1
% 0 0 1 1 1
148
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 17 3 2 2 3
% 0 0 3 2 2
% 0 0 8 17 8
% 8 10 1 2 5
% 0 7 0 0 2
% 4 0 0 0 0
% 0 1 0 0 0
149
Table 23. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by type of
shortcomings in existing govt. policies
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 4 0 0 0 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
150
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
151
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
HANDLOOM
LIMITATION OF RESOURCES 0 0 1 0 1
POPULATION
152
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
TOTAL 4 3 38 16 61
HANDICRAFT
153
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
INSECURITY OF ENTREPRENEURS 0 0 0 1 1
LACK OF MARKETING PLACE OF
PRODUCTS.
TOTAL 2 0 0 37 39
OTHER
LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURAL 3 0 1 0 4
FACILITY (LIKE ROAD, TRANSPORT,
WATER)
ROAD, POWER SUPPLY, LACK OF 1 0 1 0 2
AWARENESS BETWEEN
ENTREPRENEURS.
LACK OF EDUCATION IN THE AREA 0 0 4 0 4
LACK OF STANDARD RAW MATERIALS
154
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
ALL CLUSTERS
% 4 0 0 0 0
155
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 0 1 1 0
% 8 0 0 0 0
LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURAL 5 0 2 0 7
FACILITY (LIKE ROAD, TRANSPORT,
WATER)
% 20 0 2 0 2
156
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 0 5 1 2
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 12 0 0 0 1
% 0 0 2 0 0
157
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 12 0 0 0 1
% 0 1 0 0 0
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 4 0 0 0 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 1 0 0 0
% 0 0 5 0 1
UNHELPFUL GOVT POLICIES LACK OF 0 0 10 14 24
PROPER GUIDANCE
% 0 0 8 10 6
158
Table 24. Districtwise distribution of sampled units by type of cluster and by
constraints in cluster development.
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
LIMITATION OF RESOURCES 0 0 1 0 1
POPULATION
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 4 0 0 0 0
% 0 0 2 0 0
% 4 0 0 0 0
INSECURITY OF ENTREPRENEURS 0 0 6 4 10
LACK OF MARKETING PLACE OF
PRODUCTS.
% 0 0 5 3 2
% 0 0 0 1 0
Note: All units did not respond and some have identified more than one constraint, therefore
total may not tally
159
Table 25. Districtwise classification of sampled units by type of cluster and by
advantage of cluster to owner/entrepreneur
160
Table 25. Districtwise classification of sampled units by type of cluster and by
advantage of cluster to owner/entrepreneur
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
Other 8 15 22 9 54
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
Assist in formulation of financially viable project 3 3 0 0 6
% 2 2 0 0 1
Assist in availability of finance for setting up project 28 83 106 103 320
% 18 55 69 67 52
Assist in obtaining government subsidy 26 95 117 118 356
% 17 63 76 77 58
Create awareness of risks and ways to get over them 25 94 122 124 365
% 16 63 79 81 60
Assist in obtaining raw materials 28 110 125 140 403
% 18 73 81 92 66
Assist in obtaining better/more economical transport 26 124 120 130 400
% 17 83 78 85 65
Assist in technology upgradation 26 76 123 121 346
% 17 51 80 79 57
Improve marketing facilities 0 10 4 14 28
% 0 7 3 9 5
Increase profits 16 53 62 101 232
% 10 35 40 66 38
Other 11 70 67 28 176
% 7 47 44 18 29
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
Note: Cluster units have indicated more than one advantage, therefore total may not tally
161
Table 26A. Districtwise classification of sampled units by type of cluster and by
advantage of cluster to society/national economy to a large extent
162
Table 26A. Districtwise classification of sampled units by type of cluster and by
advantage of cluster to society/national economy to a large extent
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
Increase in worker income 8 2 18 24 52
Harmonious labour-owner relations 6 10 27 20 63
Benefit to local economy 9 17 26 18 70
Strengthen rural infrastructure 10 10 22 18 60
Develop local initiative and
leadership 1 2 1 3 7
Promote innovations and creativity 7 20 26 25 78
Other 0 1 7 0 8
Total 54 28 40 36 158
ALL CLUSTERS
Efficient use of raw material 5 22 24 23 74
% 3 15 16 15 12
Efficient use of and economy in use
of power 12 86 101 66 265
% 8 57 66 43 43
Increase in worker productivity 12 41 68 82 203
% 8 27 44 54 33
Increase in worker income 11 36 70 85 202
% 7 24 45 56 33
Harmonious labour-owner relations 9 59 89 83 240
% 6 39 58 54 39
Benefit to local economy 14 70 88 76 248
% 9 47 57 50 41
Strengthen rural infrastructure 14 63 88 79 244
% 9 42 57 52 40
Develop local initiative and
leadership 4 32 9 13 58
% 3 21 6 8 9
Promote innovations and creativity 8 63 79 87 237
% 5 42 51 57 39
Other 0 2 18 1 21
% 0 1 12 1 3
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
Note: Cluster units have indicated more than one advantage; therefore total may not
tally
163
Table 26B. Districtwise classification of sampled units by type of cluster and by
advantage of cluster to society/national economy to some extent
164
Table 26B. Districtwise classification of sampled units by type of cluster and by
advantage of cluster to society/national economy to some extent
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
Strengthen rural infrastructure 8 13 14 14 49
Develop local initiative and leadership 4 9 0 5 18
Promote innovations and creativity 9 3 5 8 25
Other 1 0 1 1 3
ALL CLUSTERS
Efficient use of raw material 4 4 7 25 40
% 3 3 5 16 7
Efficient use of and economy in use of
power 16 40 23 75 154
% 10 27 15 49 25
Increase in worker productivity 13 81 54 45 193
% 8 54 35 29 32
Increase in worker income 13 79 49 38 179
% 8 53 32 25 29
Harmonious labour-owner relations 12 64 38 47 161
% 8 43 25 31 26
Benefit to local economy 13 54 37 55 159
% 8 36 24 36 26
Strengthen rural infrastructure 14 63 38 53 168
% 9 42 25 35 27
Develop local initiative and leadership 5 36 15 17 73
% 3 24 10 11 12
Promote innovations and creativity 14 59 26 48 147
% 9 39 17 31 24
Other 1 1 3 2 7
% 1 1 2 1 1
G.Total 154 150 154 153 611
Note: Cluster units have indicated more than one advantage,therefore total may not tally
165
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
166
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
HANDLOOM
167
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
168
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
HANDICRAFT
OTHER
169
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
170
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
ALL CLUSTERS
171
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
PEPPERMINT-LARGE SCALE 0 0 1 0 1
CULTIVATION OF MINT,
% 0 0 1 0 0
% 4 0 1 0 0
172
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 1 0 0 0
% 0 1 0 0 0
173
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 0 0 0 1 0
% 4 0 0 0 0
% 0 0 1 3 1
174
Table 27A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better potential
industries by types of cluster and characteristic available in the region for SSI
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
% 0 0 1 0 0
SSI OF MEDICINES 1 0 0 0 1
% 4 0 0 0 0
Note: All units did not respond and some have given more than one suggestion, therefore total
may not tally
175
Table 27B. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better
potential industries by type of cluster and characteristic available
in the region for Handicraft
HANDLOOM
HAND LOOM, POWERLOOM
GROWTH IN THIS SECTOR
TRADITIONAL WORK OF THIS AREA 0 0 29 8 37
176
Table 27B. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better
potential industries by type of cluster and characteristic available
in the region for Handicraft
HANDICRAFT
HAND LOOM, POWERLOOM
GROWTH IN THIS SECTOR
TRADITIONAL WORK OF THIS AREA 0 0 0 12 12
SEWING OF CHILDREN'S CLOTH
BETTER AVAILABILITY OF SKILLED
WORKERS. 0 0 0 1 1
CARPET & HANDLOOM WORKS
AVAILABILITY OF WORKERS & RAW
MATERIALS 0 0 0 17 17
CHICKAN WORKS & CARPET
WEAVING AVAILABILITY OF SKILLED
WORKERS 0 0 0 3 3
ZARDOZI WORK BECAUSE SKILLED
WORK ARE AVAILABLE HERE 0 0 0 1 1
HANDICRAFT AND POWERLOOM
BECAUSE AVAILABILITY OF RAW
MATERIAL 0 0 0 1 1
PAPAD & CHIPS FACTORY-DUE TO
AVAILABILITY OF POTATO. 0 0 0 1 1
ZARI HANDLOOM, CARPET
WEAVING , AVAILABILITY OF
WEAVING & WORKERS. 0 0 0 1 1
TOTAL 0 0 0 37 37
OTHER
HAND LOOM, POWERLOOM
GROWTH IN THIS SECTOR
TRADITIONAL WORK OF THIS AREA 4 8 24 16 52
177
Table 27B. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better
potential industries by type of cluster and characteristic available
in the region for Handicraft
ALL CLUSTERS
HAND LOOM, POWERLOOM
GROWTH IN THIS SECTOR
TRADITIONAL WORK OF THIS AREA 4 28 99 56 187
% 17 21 77 41 44
SEWING OF CHILDREN'S CLOTH
BETTER AVAILABILITY OF SKILLED
WORKERS. 0 0 0 5 5
% 0 0 0 4 1
178
Table 27B. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better
potential industries by type of cluster and characteristic available
in the region for Handicraft
179
Table 27B. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for better
potential industries by type of cluster and characteristic available
in the region for Handicraft
Note: All units did not respond and some have given more than one suggestion; therefore
total may not tally
180
Table 28 A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for improving
viability/profitability by type of cluster and by character in Financing
181
Table 28 A. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for improving
viability/profitability by type of cluster and by character in Financing
182
Table 28B. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for improving
viability/profitability by type of cluster and by character in Infrastructure
HANDLOOM
Roads 3 3 38 16 60
Power 3 3 38 16 60
Transport 3 3 38 16 60
Communication 3 3 38 16 60
Banking 3 3 38 16 60
Police 3 3 29 15 50
Market Information and Marketing facilities 2 3 38 16 59
Trading 2 4 40 16 62
Total 2 4 40 16 63
HANDICRAFT
Roads 1 0 0 38 39
Power 1 0 0 38 39
Transport 0 0 0 38 38
Communication 0 0 0 38 38
Banking 1 0 0 38 39
Police 1 0 0 36 37
Market Information and Marketing facilities 1 0 0 38 39
Trading 1 0 0 42 43
Total 1 0 0 42 44
OTHER
Roads 18 27 37 35 117
Power 18 27 37 35 117
Transport 18 27 37 35 117
Communication 18 27 37 35 117
Banking 19 27 37 35 118
Police 18 27 32 34 111
183
Table 28B. Districtwise classification of suggestions received for improving
viability/profitability by type of cluster and by character in Infrastructure
ALL CLUSTERS
Roads 25 139 132 144 440
% 96 95 93 97 94
Power 25 139 132 144 440
% 96 95 93 97 94
Transport 24 139 132 144 439
% 92 95 93 97 94
Communication 23 139 132 144 438
% 88 95 93 97 94
Banking 25 139 132 144 440
% 96 95 93 97 94
Police 24 139 96 128 387
% 92 95 68 86 83
Market Information and Marketing facilities 23 139 132 144 438
% 88 95 93 97 94
Trading 26 147 142 149 464
% 100 100 100 100 99
G.Total 26 147 142 149 468
Note: Only responding units have been classified and percentage are based on the maximum response
184
Table 29. Districtwise classification of role of modern information technology in
cluster development by type of cluster
UNNAO GORAKHPUR BARABANKI HARDOI TOTAL
SSI
IMPROVED QUALITY OF PRODUCTS 2 107 54 55 218
BETTER PRODUCTION GOOD QUALITY 0 0 1 0 1
TOTAL 2 107 55 55 219
HANDLOOM
IMPROVED QUALITY OF PRODUCTS 2 3 35 16 56
MODERN MACHINES 0 0 1 0 1
TOTAL 2 3 36 16 57
HANDICRAFT
IMPROVED QUALITY OF PRODUCTS 1 0 0 38 39
NIL BCERAP WHITE SAND 1 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 2 0 0 38 40
OTHER
IMPROVED QUALITY OF PRODUCTS 18 28 36 35 117
TOTAL 18 28 36 35 117
ALL CLUSTERS
IMPROVED QUALITY OF PRODUCTS 23 138 125 144 430
% 96 100 98 100 99
BETTER PRODUCTION GOOD QUALITY 0 0 1 0 1
% 0 0 1 0 0
MODERN MACHINES 0 0 1 0 1
% 0 0 1 0 0
NIL BCERAP WHITE SAND 1 0 0 0 1
% 4 0 0 0 0
GRAND TOTAL 24 138 127 144 433
185
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
SSI
186
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
HANDLOOM
187
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
188
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
HANDICRAFT
189
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
190
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
ALL CLUSTERS 15 14 31 28 88
191
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
MOBILISING OPINION IN 9 0 0 0 1
FAVOUR OF CLUSTER
FORMATION. CREATING
AWARENESS ABOUT THE
EFFECTIVE ROLE OF
CLUSTER IN GENERATION
% 1 0 0 0 1
192
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
% 2 0 1 0 3
% 2 0 0 0 2
% 0 0 0 1 1
193
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
% 0 1 0 0 1
% 0 0 1 0 1
194
Table 30. Districtwise classification of role of NGOs in cluster development
by type of cluster
195