Esthetic Depigmentation of Anterior Gingiva: A Case: Indian Dental Journal
Esthetic Depigmentation of Anterior Gingiva: A Case: Indian Dental Journal
Mumbai 400069. 3Assistant professor, Department of Periodontics & Community Dentistry, Z A Dental college, AMU, Alighar, UP, India.
Address for Correspondence: Dr Amitabh Varshney, Chandra Health Care, Delhi Gate Chauraha, Alighar, UP, India.
E-mail: amitabhvarshney@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
Excessive gingival pigmentation is a major esthetic concern for many people. Though, it is not a medical problem,
many people complain of dark gums as unesthetic and demand for cosmetic therapy. This problem is aggravated in
patients with a "gummy smile" or excessive gingival display while smiling. Esthetic periodontal plastic surgery is
especially successful in individuals with compromised esthetics. A case is reported here where gingival
depigmentation was done using three different techniques: electrosurgery; scalpel surgery; and surgical abrasion.
The clinical results of the three methods have been compared.
8
INDIAN DENTAL JOURNAL
Offical Publication of Society of Medical Dental & Public Health
procedures were explained verbally to the patient and and the amount of the pigment containing cells
written informed consent was taken before the determine the colour of the gingiva.13 As the
procedure. awareness of gingival aesthetics is on the rise, a
larger group of people have been requesting to
Scalpel method: The surgical site was anesthetized
undergo depigmentation procedures. A variety of
by local infiltration with 2% lignocaine containing
procedures have been therefore been explored, with
1:80000 adrenaline. A Bard Parker handle with a
almost the same amount of success. The scalpel
No.15 blade were used to remove the entire
method is one of the foremost recommended
pigmented epithelium along with a thin layer of
techniques due to the easy availability of equipments
connective tissue. (Fig.2&3) Electrocautery: A
to carry out this procedure. It is not overtly technique
straight wire electrode tip was used to de-epithelialize
sensitive and has shown to heal faster as compared to
the labial mucosa. Light, gentle ‘paintbrush-like’
other techniques.14 However, the disadvantage of this
strokes were used and the electrode is always kept in
method is the bleeding and the large area of exposed
motion, to prevent a build-up of lateral heat at the tip
lamina propria that has to be probably covered by a
of the electrode. The electrode tip was cautiously
periodontal pack. The electrosurgical method is more
used to avoid injury to the tooth surface or adjacent
technique sensitive and requires an electrosurgical
tissues. (Fig 4 & 5) Abrasion by rotary round bur:
unit that leads to additional costing. This method
A contra-angled hand piece and carbide bur were
cannot be used in poorly shielded cardiac pace
used for abrasion on the other side. Abrasion under
makers, the heat generated by injudicious use can
water spray over an epithelial layer was performed
cause tissue damage and loss of periodontal support
until whitish connective tissue was exposed. All the
when the electrode is used close to bone and also
melanin remnants of the epithelium were completely
treatment causes unpleasant odor. But this technique
removed to prevent the possibility of recurrence.
has the advantage of hemorrhage control and the
(Fig.6&7) After surgery, the denuded connective
subsequent healing discomfort & scar formation is
tissue was covered with a periodontal pack. Patient
minimal.15 Bur abrasion or de-epithelialization using
was instructed to avoid trauma to the treated gingiva
surgical bur has been employed but the depth of de
and avoid acidic and hot food for one week. Post-
epithelialization cannot be precisely controlled in this
surgical antibiotics (Amoxicillin 500mg, thrice daily
technique.16 It is an easy technique that requires
for five days) and Analgesics (ibuprofen, thrice daily
minimal surgical expertise. This case report has
for three days) were prescribed. The patient was
shown all the 3 techniques to provide a remarkable
advised to use chlorhexidine mouthwash 12 hourly
improvement in the aesthetic and cosmetic
for one week. He was reevaluated 10 days and 6
appearance of the gingiva. Some recurrence of
months after the last surgical session. Evaluation
pigmentation has been observed in mandibular labial
included clinical examination and comparative
segment where the carbide bur was used. Insufficient
clinical photographs.
depth of de-epithelialization can be attributed to be,
as the cause of this recurrence. Some pigmentation
also remained on the marginal gingiva and papilla of
RESULTS the maxillary labial segment because the epithelium
No discomfort, teeth sensitivity, pain or bleeding of the papillary edges and free gingival margins were
complications were found intra or postoperatively. not removed perfectly. This was done to avoid the
The patient was satisfied with the significant occurrence of recession.
improvement in color. Tissue deformities, e.g.,
gingival recession and loss of papilla, were not
observed after 6 months because the papillary edges CONCLUSION
and free gingival margins were left untreated.
The depigmentation procedures carried out in this
However, some recurrence can be observed in the
case report have been shown to be successful, cost
mandibular labial segment.(Fig.8)
effective, causing minimal discomfort and the patient
was satisfied with the result. It can be thus concluded
that gingival depigmentation is a reliable procedure
DISCUSSION that can be easily and quickly performed and the
Wide variations have been recorded in the gingival aesthetic result that is obtained from this procedure
colour in normal healthy persons. The degree of has been shown to gratify the patients who are often
vascularization, the thickness of the keratinized layer self conscious of this condition.
9
INDIAN DENTAL JOURNAL
Offical Publication of Society of Medical Dental & Public Health
2) Dummet CO. Over view of normal pigmentations. 10) Farnoosh AA. Treatment of gingival pigmentótion
J Indiana dent assoc 1980; 59(3):13-18. and discoloration for esthetic purposes. Int J Periodont
Rest Dent 1990:10:313-318.
3) Fry L, Almyeda JR. The incidence of buccal
pigmentation in caucasoids and negroids in Britain. Brit 11) Tamizi M, Taheri M. Treatment of severe
J Dermatol 1968; 80(4): 244-7. physiological gingival pigmentation with free gingival
autograft. Quintessence Int 1996 Aug; 27(8):555-8.
4) Leston JM et al. Oral mucosa variation from
normalicy, part II. Cutis 2002; 69(3): 215-7. 12) Roshna T, Nandakumar K. Anterior esthetic
gingival depigmentation and crown lengthening: Report
5) Almas K, Sadig W. Surgical treatment of melanin- of a case. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 15: 139- 47.
pigmented gingival; An esthetic approach. Indian J dent
Res.2002 April- Jun; 13(2):70-3. 13) Humagain M, Nayak DG and Uppoor US. Gingival
depigmentation: A case report with review of literature.
6) Tal H, Landsberg J, Kozlovsky A. Cryosurgical JNDA 2009, vol 10, No.1, Jan-Jun: 53-56.
depigmentation of the gingival. A case report. J Clin
Periodontol 1987 Nov; 14(10):614-7. 14) Almas K, Sadiq W: Surgical Treatment of Melanin-
Pigmented Gingiva: An Esthetic Approach. Indian
7) Gnanasekhar JD, Al-Duwairi YS. Electro surgery Journal of Dental Research, 2002; 13( 2): 70-73.
in dentistry. Quintessence Int 1998; 29(10)649-54.
15) Krejci RF. Kalkwarf KL and Krause-Hohenstein U.
8) Tal H, Oegiesser D, Tal M. Gingival Electrosurgery-a biological approach. J Clin Periodontol
depigmentation by Erbium:YAG laser: clinical 1987: 14: 557-563.
observation and patient responses. J Periodontol 2003
Nov; 74(11):1660-7. 16) Bishop K.Treatment of unsightly oral pigmentation:
a case report. Dental update. 1994;21 (6):236-7.
10