HW1 Laws
HW1 Laws
1
Sapalaran, Ma. Carmela P
ECE70/A11
mcpsapalaran@hotmail.ph
Section 5.
CHAPTER 4 1. X obliged himself to deliver to Y a
specific carabao to Y on July 31. The
Section 1.
carabao died on July 25. Y has no
1. D (debtor) owes C (creditor) P10,000 proof that X was negligent. Is X liable
with G as guarantor. On the due date to Y?
of the obligation, T, a third person, 2. X obliges himself to deliver a specific
offered to pay the obligation D. Can thing to Y on a certain date. The thing
C legally refuse to accept the was lost by X without his fault and
payment? How about an offer of before he has incurred in delay. Does
payment from G? it mean that X is already exempt from
2. M (maker) issued a promissory note liability?
for P10,000 in favor of P (payee) who 3. Suppose in the preceding problem,
lost the note which was found by T the thing was lost through the fault of
who demands payment from M. M Z, a third person. State the effect of
did not know that the note was lost by the loss as far as X, Y, and Z are
P. Is M justified in paying T? concerned.
3. D owes C P10,000 which was paid by
T who demands reimbursement from Section 3.
D. 1. D (debtor) borrowed money from C
(a) When is D liable to T? (creditor) evidenced by a promissory
(b) When is D not liable to T? note signed by D.
(c) When is D liable for less than (a) What presumption arises if:
P10,000 to T? 1) The promissory note is
(d) May D be liable to T for P12,000 voluntarily given by C to D?
if that was the amount paid by him 2) It is found in the possession of
to C? D?
4. D owes C P10,000. Without the (b) When will the presumption of
knowledge of C, D in good faith paid remission arise?
to T his obligation to C. Is D required 2. Suppose in the same problem, the
by law to prove that the payment has debt of D, aside from being
been received by C in order to be guaranteed by G, is secured by a
released from liability? pledge of a certificate of shares of
5. D owes C P10,000 in payment for stock delivered by D to C. what
which C accepts a check from D. On presumption arises if:
the ground that a check is not legal (a) the debt of D is condoned by C?
tender, C later insists that D pay him (b) the certificate is later found in the
in cash. Is D justified in rejecting this possession of D?
demand of C?
Section 4.
Section 2.
1. A, B, and C are jointly liable to D in 1. T (third person) tells C (creditor) that
the amount of P15,000. Subsequently, T will pay the debt of D (debtor). C
D assigned his credit to C in agrees. Is D released from his
consideration for goods sold by C to obligation to C?
D. Give the effect of the assignment. 2. Suppose in the above problem, D
2. Assuming the obligation of A, B, and proposed to C that T would substitute
C is solidary, distinguish the effect of D as the new debtor to which C
the assignment from the first agreed. Is D still liable to C in case of
problem. insolvency of T?
3. T paid C the debt of D without
Section 5. objection from the latter. What are the
1. D borrowed P50,000 as character rights of T>
loan (no security) from a bank. 4. Illustrate a mixed novation.
Despite demands for payment after
. Title II
the loan fell due, D did not pay the
bank. D has a savings deposit of Chapter 1
P40,000 with the bank. Has the bank
the right to apply the deposit to the 1. A and B entered into a contract
payment of D’s debt? not specifically provided in the Civil Code. Is the
2. D owes C P10,000 payable on contract valid and binding?
November 20. C owes D P10,000
payable on October 20. Can 2. S (seller) and B (buyer) entered
compensation also take place into a contract of sale. It was agreed that the price
although the debts are not payable on shall be determined by T, a third person. Can S or
the same date?
B refuse to be bound by T’s determination of the
3. Illustrate compensation which can be
set up only by one of the parties. price if he does not agree with the amount
4. After contracting a debt in the amount thereof?
of P10,000 in favor of C, D succeeded
through fraudulent means to make C 3. D owes C P20,000. Both are
liable to him in the same amount. house painters. It was agreed that D instead of
Assuming that both obligations are paying C, will paint the house of E to which E
now due, may the two debts be expressed his conformity to C whose service as
compensated against each other?
painter was previously contracted by E. Has B the
What is the effect if the debt of C is
right to enforce the stipulation between C and D?
later annulled in court at the instance
of D? 4. X made an office desk for Y. X
Section 6. told Y that the latter may pay whatever amount
he would like to pay for it. When the desk was
finished Y offered to pay P2,000 but X instead 1. S sold to B for P100,000 a parcel
demanded P3,000, its fair value. Is X entitled to of land belonging to S located in his hometown
P3,000? without specifying its exact location and area. Is
the sale valid?
Chapter 2
2. S has several pigs. Under a
Section 1 Problems
contract of sale, S binds himself to deliver a pig
1. In a contract containing an to a B for P3,000 if the pig has a weight of at least
option period, when is the offerer not allowed to 30 kilos. State the binding effect of the sale.
withdraw his offer even before acceptance by the
Section 3 Problems
offeree? When is the offerer allowed to withdraw
his offer even after acceptance? 1. S sold his fishing boat to B who
intends to use the boat for smuggling. Is the
2. S sold his house to B believing
contract of sale illegal?
that B was C. Can S legally withdraw from the
contract on the ground of mistake? 2. S sold to B a specific parcel of
land for P500,000. B failed to pay. Has C the right
3. S agreed to deliver to B 500
to have the sale declared void by the court on the
cavans of rice at P600 per cavan. S delivered only
ground of absence of cause for non-payment of
P490 cavans deliberately misrepresenting that the
the price?
delivery consisted of 500 cavans. Can B ask the
court to annul the contract on the ground of fraud? 3. X gave P10,000 to Y who signed
a receipt stating: “This is to acknowledge
4. S sold to B a commercial land for
payment by X in the amount of P12,000.” X later
P1,000,000. S assured B that it is certain that in
complains that he received nothing from Y for the
two years time, the land would increase in market
P10,000. Is Y bound to return the P10,000?
value by 50% or P1,500,000. It turned out that the
market value of the land even decreased to about 4. S sold to B hi car worth
P800,000. Is S liable to B for misrepresentation? P250,000 for only P200,000. There is no question
that the purchase price is grossly inadequate. Has
5. Suppose in the same problem,
S the right to have the sale annulled?
what S sold to B, hardware owner, are 500 bags
of cement. S had every reason to believe that the Chapter 3
price of cement would go down. After two weeks,
1. S (seller) and B (buyer) entered
it did go down. Has B the right to have the sale
into a contract of sale of a parcel of land. The sale
annulled?
is embodied only in a private document and not
Section 2 Problems in a public instrument because it was not
acknowledged before a notary public as required fixed amount of P200,000 or 6% of the cost of
by law. Is the sale valid? construction. How much is Y liable to pay?
assume the obligation of D. Can the promise of T nonpayment of the latter’s obligation. D won the
be proved by the testimony of a witness who was case on a technicality (i.e., not on the merits).
present when T made the same? Nevertheless, when C asked payment again, D
paid him. Now, D demands the return of what he
3. S orally agreed to sell his piano
has paid claiming, he should not have paid C
for P7,000 to B who made a partial payment of
since he had no more obligation to C under the
P1,000. Later, S denied there was such a sale. Can
law. Decide.
B enforce the sale considering that the contract
was oral and the price was more than P500? 2. M, a minor, bought a bicycle for
P2,000 from N, who is not a minor. Under the
law, the contract is voidable because M is
Chapter 9 incapacitated to give consent because of his
minority. Give the situation by reason of which
1. S (seller) and B (buyer) entered
M cannot recover the P2,000 from N.
an absolutely simulated contract of sale of a
parcel of land. S brought action in court to
recover the land only after 20 years. Is it correct
for the court to dismiss the action because of the
long lapse of time?
2. In consideration of P10,000
given by X to Y, the latter agreed to burn the