Vapor-Liquid Equilibria For The Ternary System Methyl Acetate-Benzene-Cyclohexane
Vapor-Liquid Equilibria For The Ternary System Methyl Acetate-Benzene-Cyclohexane
Methyl Acetate-Benzene-Cyclohexane
ISAMU NAGATA'
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
S E P A R A T I O N of the benzene-cyclohexane mixtures mercury (average deviation of * 3 mm. Hg.). Such devi-
resulting from hydrogenation of benzene into pure con- ations affect observed x-y data negligibly. N o correction
stituents is industrially important. This is effectively was made on them.
accomplished bv azeotropic or extractive distillation of the
mixtures with an entrainer. Several investigators have EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
reported vapor-liquid equilibrium data for ternary systems
including benzene and cyclohexane, which are needed to Binary Systems. The liquid phase activity coefficients were
design suitable distillation equipment ( 3 , 4 ,5 , 7. 13, 24, 2 5 ) . calculated using the following equation:
The objectives of this investigation are: to determine
Y8 = ?rY~/X2PI (1)
vapor-liquid equilibrium data on the methyl acetate-
benzene-cyclohexane system and to correlate the experi- The vapor pressure data for methyl acetate were obtained
mental data by two methods; one is an analytical method from the compilation of Timmermans ( 2 7 ) . The Antoine
expressing logarithm of activity coefficients, and the other equations cited by Lange ( 1 4 ) were used to calculate the
is an algebraic one, for comparison. vapor pressures of benzene and cyclohexane. Binary
equilibrium data are shown in Table 111.
The area condition for isobaric binary systems has been
EXPERIMENTAL
shown by Herington (11) and Thijssen (26)to be
Purity of Compounds. First grade (Japanses Industrial
Standards) methyl acetate was purified in accordance with
the procedure by Hurd and Strong ( 1 2 ) . Cyclohexane of
guaranteed reagent grade was used without further purifi-
cation. Special grade (Japanese Industrial Standards) For close-boiling point and some azeotropic systems the
benzene was purified by recrystallization repeated twice. right side of Equation 2 is nearly zero. The benzene-cyclo-
The physical properties of the pure compounds are shown in hexane system is an example of this statement. I n order to
Table I . check thermodynamic consistency for a binary system
Analytical M e t h o d . The binary mixtures were analyzed by showing an appreciable difference between both sides of
measuring refractive indices. T h e ternary mixtures were Equation 2 the heat of mixing data a t boiling points for
analyzed by combining refractive index and density the same system are necessary. Such data for the present
measurements. Refractive index measurements were made systems were not available. So no further calculations using
using a Shimadzu Pulfrich refractometer. Prism tempera- Equation 2 were made. Chao ( 2 ) modified the Redlich-
ture was controlled at 25 i 0.1" C. by circulating water Kister equations for isobaric conditions, accounting for the
from a constant temperature bath. Monochromatic light requirements of Equation 2. The equation used to correlate
was obtained from a sodium lamp. Modified Lipkin-type the experimental data on log y l / y ? in terms of liquid
pycnometers were used for density determination. The compositions is
values of refractive index and density were reproducible
within +0.0001. Figure 1 is a ternary calibration diagram
log ~
Yl
=a + b (x? - x;) + c (6x1x?- 1) (3)
Yl
constructed from analytical data listed in Table 11.
Temperatures were measured by a copper-constantan Constants of the equation are given in Table IV. The
thermocouple which was calibrated against a standard activity coefficients of the separate components are
thermometer and was connected with a Yokogawa P-7 expressed by
potentiometer. Observed temperatures were corrected to
normal boiling points (20) and are believed to be accurate + C(XI- xd] + x ? [ a+ b ( x 2 - xl)+ c(6xlx?- 1)l
log 7 1= xlx?[B (4)
within k0.05" C.
Vapor-liquid equilibrium data on the mixtures were log ~2 = xixi[B + C ( X i - x ? ) ] -XI[. +b ( ~ i
-xi) + C ( ~ X ~ W- ?l ) ] (5)
obtained under atmospheric pressure using a Colburn
vapor-recirculating still as described by Grisword and B and C in Equations 4 and 5 are not independent of b and c
Buford (8). Atmospheric pressure recorded during experi- respectively. They must fulfill the following relations to
mental runs showed small deviations from 760 mm. of satisfy thermodynamic requirements (19).
XP X?b d? n% XI X? d? n$ XI X? di5 ns
0.923 0.077 0.9218 1.3698 0.761 0 0.8706 1.3730 0.399 0 0.8123 1.3963
0.872 0.128 0.9181 1.3769 0.661 0.131 0.8704 1.3893 0.341 0.145 0.8200 1.4095
0.798 0.202 0.9131 1.3879 0.527 0.308 0.8708 1.4113 0.258 0.353 0.8315 1.4291
0.714 0.286 0.9081 1.3997 0.465 0.388 0.8708 1.4212 0.225 0.435 0.8365 1.4370
0.647 0.353 0.9041 1.4094 0.380 0.500 0.8711 1.4351 0.189 0.525 0.8420 1.4462
0.547 0.453 0.8986 1.4236 0.325 0.573 0.8714 1.4442 0.163 0.593 0.8461 1.4531
0.448 0.552 0.8920 1.4372 0.262 0.655 0.8718 1.4546 0.125 0.686 0.8522 1.4628
0.343 0.657 0.8881 1.4517 0.186 0.755 0.8721 1.4671 0.088 0.781 0.8583 1.4730
0.298 0.702 0.8861 1.4578 0.128 0.832 0.8727 1.4765 0.058 0.855 0.8635 1.4814
0.190 0.810 0.8814 1.4723
0.678 0 0.8546 1.3782 0.316 0 0.8021 1.4020
0 0.078 0.7791 1.4276 0.576 0.151 0.8569 1.3957 0.258 0.185 0.8132 1.4175
0 0.176 0.7860 1.4328 0.457 0.327 0.8602 1.4161 0.220 0.304 0.8208 1.4277
0 0.281 0.7941 1.4389 0.394 0.418 0.8618 1.4272 0.189 0.403 0.8274 1.4368
0 0.379 0.8025 1.4452 0.365 0.462 0.8626 1.4321 0.160 0.495 0.8338 1.4453
0 0.460 0.8100 1.4507 0.275 0.594 0.8652 1.4482 0.086 0.727 0.8512 1.4684
0 0.561 0.8202 1.4583 0.229 0.662 0.8667 1.4565 0.045 0.857 0.8617 1.4823
0 0.638 0.8281 1.4642 0.109 0.840 0.8703 1.4782
0 0.714 0.8367 1.4707 0.268 0 0.7968 1.4051
0 0.795 0.8463 1.4779 0.624 0 0.8455 1.3816 0.221 0.175 0.8078 1.4187
0 0.867 0.8557 1.4847 0.535 0.143 0.8491 1.3975 0.186 0.305 0.8166 1.4298
0.477 0.237 0.8516 1.4079 0.152 0.431 0.8260 1.4407
0.945 0 0.9129 1.3621 0.400 0.360 0.8549 1.4221 0.128 0.522 0.8326 1.4490
0.787 0.167 0.9041 1.3854 0.333 0.467 0.8580 1.4346 0.103 0.616 0.8402 1.4578
0.679 0.281 0.8990 1.4011 0.266 0.574 0.8608 1.4467 0.082 0.694 0.8464 1.4656
0.600 0.365 0.8954 1.4127 0.193 0.690 0.8641 1.4606 0.058 0.784 0.8541 1.4747
0.501 0.470 0.8911 1.4270 0.081 0.870 0.8696 1.4821 0.042 0.844 0.8593 1.4809
0.411 0.565 0.8874 1.4400
0.342 0.637 0.8850 1.4498 0.550 0 0.8334 1.3865 0.154 0 0.7856 1.4132
0.248 0.737 0.8816 1.4631 0.461 0.162 0.8391 1.4034 0.128 0.171 0.7973 1.4246
0.179 0.811 0.8791 1.4728 0.404 0.265 0.8432 1.4144 0.097 0.371 0.8124 1.4394
0.362 0.342 0.8461 1.4227 0.082 0.465 0.8201 1.4470
0.863 0 0.8928 1.3669 0.272 0.505 0.8527 1.4406 0.072 0.532 0.8260 1.4525
0.727 0.157 0.8887 1.3879 0.216 0.608 0.8570 1.4522 0.056 0.638 0.8358 1.4620
0.595 0.310 0.8853 1.4080 0.182 0.669 0.8593 1.4591 0.045 0.708 0.8424 1.4683
0.511 0.407 0.8830 1.4209 0.082 0.851 0.8672 1.4803 0.031 0.799 0.8517 1.4773
0.457 0.471 0.8816 1.4292 0.022 0.860 0.8580 1.4832
0.362 0.580 0.8799 1.4442 0.478 0 0.8230 1.3911
0.300 0.652 0.8788 1.4531 0.402 0.158 0.8299 1.4066 0.076 0 0.7794 1.4185
0.208 0.758 0.8771 1.4670 0.349 0.269 0.8351 1.4179 0.063 0.180 0.7919 1.4293
0.136 0.843 0.8757 1.4779 0.300 0.374 0.8403 1.4286 0.049 0.365 0.8063 1.4416
0.244 0.479 0.8454 1.4395 0.043 0.439 0.8129 1.4471
0.820 0 0.8831 1.3694 0.208 0.565 0.8498 1.4488 0.035 0.548 0.8228 1.4478
0.744 0.093 0.8818 1.3814 0.132 0.723 0.8584 1.4662 0.028 0.640 0.8321 1.4631
0.595 0.274 0.8793 1.4048 0.076 0.841 0.8649 1.4795 0.021 0.719 0.8403 1.4702
0.500 0.390 0.8780 1.4198 0.015 0.801 0.8494 1.4777
0.443 0.460 0.8772 1.4286 0.010 0.863 0.8568 1.4839
0.344 0.581 0.8763 1.4442
0.274 0.660 0.8758 1.4551
0.198 0.759 0.8748 1.4676
0.152 0.815 0.8746 1.4743 Mole fraction of methyl acetate. * Mole fractiQn of benzene.
Table IV. Constants Used in Expressing Log r,/y, Experimental and calculated activity coefficients are
d o t t e d in Figure 2. I t is Dractical to comDare calculated
Y
XI
CYCLO.
HEXAM
0.2
1
+ [ X I X ? ( X >+ XI) + x X f ] ( C 1 7 + . ) + [ X ? X i ( X ? + X3) - BXiXl]
, ,
33-13 r i d d i d
m
U
m
z
. . . . .
r i d 4 1 3
-0 U
GE -1Lo?c??
. I-wwc-w
m m m ~ w
N
C
m
z
+
c
U
E
a
-
x
f
?
5
b
+
U
+
O
n
.- 5
L
wmmm*
rccowt-t-
c9""c??
a
.-
- 0 0 0 0 3
3
0-
UJ
0
.-0-
2
O w d m 0
bQ oowwww
9wu?yc?
2 0 0 0 0 0
2-
E
c
>
m
5
t
xmot--
i m c s m m
"""i"
ooooo 0 0 0 3 0
c-mwxt-
@ J i m 0 0
?*?t;q
C O G 0 3
x, + x a, + x,x d ,
:=:( x b +xc, 1 (10)
,i bi
,i
:
bl,
: (*
where CY'S are ternary constants to be determined horn the
experimental data.
Boiling temperatures of the binary and ternary systems
were calculated in accordance with the method proposed by
the author ( 1 6 , 1 8 ) .For the present ternary mixtures
Subscripts
1, 2, 3, i, j = components
0 42 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 m = mixture
X
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
RECEIVED for review March 16, 1962. Accepted June 29, 1962.
The author thanks Fumitake Yoshida who supported this Part of dissertation submitted by Isamu Nagata to Kyoto Univer-
work and Yoshio Tamaki for carrying out part of the sity in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
experimental measurements. doctor of engineering.