DEDICATION

This pure modest research work is genuinely dedicated to the following

people who are very precious to me;
To my parents, Pedro E. Orioste and Julita Orioste

”Thank you for bringing us up to into a kind – hearted, God fearing,

friendly and loving persons with good value”

My brothers Francis Ivan C. Orioste and Paulo Tristan C. Orioste and

to my sister Raziel C. Orioste;
To all my friends;
To BSHRM Batch 2016-2017;
And most importantly, to our Almighty God.

P.J.C.O
 ACKNOWLEGEMENT

The author affectionately extends his sincere gratitude with endless

pleasure to those who guided and supported him throughout the completion

of this research work;

Laguna State Polytechnic University, his alma mater for being a

toll in endowing with the chance to be more competitive and experienced

human being;

To our Hon. Nestor. M. De Vera, Ph.D. University President of the

Laguna State Polytechnic University, for giving his knowledge and full

support and for the efforts to maintain the high quality education in the

University.

To Dr. Roberto C. Miranda, our Campus director for his continues

support to all students.

To Charmine V. Rivera, Dean of the College Hospitality

Management and Tourism, for giving we full support and knowledge that

help us to motivate to be a good student.

To Prof. Leslie T. Salazar, thesis adviser, for her valuable guidance

that encourage the researchers to accomplish this research study.

To Merilyn P. Juacalla, Ed. D, his statistician, for his untiring effort

in helping the researcher to improve this research study.

 To my Loving Parents, Perdro E. Orioste and Julita C. Orioste, for

their unconditional love and support, for their patience and understanding

to the times he wasn’t able to help them by doing some chores, for their

never fading advices, for providing all his needs financially and morally, and

most of all for being there for him through ups and down.

To his brothers and sister who serve an inspiration to me, to keep

on encouraging me to give my best in all everything I do and for being

always there for me.

To his classmates BSHRM-4B Batch 2016-2017, for the happy

moments and a memorable memories that we’d shared in good times and

bad times. Thank you to all of you.

P.J.C.O
 ABSTRACT

This study primarily determined the employability of the graduates of Hotel

and Restaurant Management of Laguna State Polytechnic University, Sta. Cruz

Laguna Year 2014-2016. The study aims to answer the following: 1.What are the

Competencies Status of BSHRM Graduates in terms of Communication Skills,

Self-Management and Academic Performance? 2. What is the mean level of

Employability Graduates of BSHRM in terms of Job Relevance, Job Movement

and Work Status? 3. Is there a significant relationship between the Competencies

to the Employability Status of BSHRM Graduates Sta. Cruz Laguna Year 2014-

2016?

The researcher used the descriptive methods of research applied on this

study. In the analysis of data, the statistical treatments applied were mean and

standard deviation and so with the regression to determine the employability of

BSHRM Graduates of Laguna State Polytechnic University, Sta. Cruz Laguna Year

2014-2016.

The main instrument to gather the data of this study, the researcher utilized

a questionnaire. The questionnaire divided into two parts, part one is consists of

competencies of employability graduates in terms of communication skills, self-

management and academic performance. The part two is consists of the

employability status of graduates in terms of job relevance, job movement and

work status. Upon the retrieval of the questionnaires, the data were tabulated and

analyzed.
 The Mean Level of Competencies in term of Communication Skills with the

total weighted of 4.29 and standard deviation of 0.4006 was verbally interpreted

as “Strongly Agree”. Self-Management with the total weighted mean of 4.27 and

standard deviation of 0.5516 was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”.

Academic Performance with the total weighted mean of 4.15 and standard

deviation of 0.46 was verbally interpreted as “Agree”. The mean level of

employability status of BSHRM Graduates in terms of job relevance with the total

weighted of 4.23 and standard deviation of 0.44 verbally interpreted as “Strongly

Agree”. Job Movement got a weighted mean of 4.25 and standard deviation of 0.42

was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. Work status with the total of weighted

of 4.25 and standard deviation of 0.52 was verbally interpreted as “Agree”.

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preliminaries Page

TITLE PAGE ……………………………………………………………...i

APPROVAL PAGE ………………………………….…………………...ii
DEDICATION …………………………………………………………….iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ………………………………….……………..iv
ABSTRACT …………………………………………………….…………v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………….……...vi
LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………...…….…..vii
LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………….……viii

CHAPTER
1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction …………………….…………………………………1
Background of the Study …………...……..………………………..2
Theoretical Framework ………………..………………………….3
Conceptual Framework ………….…………………………….....4
Statement of the Problem ………..…………………………………5
Research Hypothesis …………………..…………………………...6
Significance of the Study …………………………………..……….7
Scope and Limitation ……………………….……………………….8
Definition of Terms ……………………….……………………….…9

2 REVIEWS OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Related Literature ………………………………………………...
Related Studies ……………………………….…………………
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design ……………………………………………………………….
Population and Sampling Technique ………………………………………..
Research Procedure .………………………………………………………….
Research Instruments …………………………………………………………
Statistical Treatment …………………………………………………………..

4 PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION DATA ………………

5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

Summary ……………………………………………………………………….
Findings …………………………………………………………………………
Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………
Recommendations ……………………………………………………………

BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………………..

APPENDICES
A Letter of Request…………………………………………………………..
B Questionnaire ………………………………………………………………..
C Data Matrix
CURRICULUM VITAE ………………………………………………………………
 CHAPTER I

PROPBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction

One of the factors that determine the effectiveness of an academic institution is

through the employability of its graduates. The quality of graduates is very much a function

of quality instruction and facilities because these will help to ensure that graduates are

equipped with the knowledge, skills and values that will enable them to work in their

respective field. Employability are set of attributes to ensure that they have a capability of

being effective in the workplace.

Laguna State Polytechnic University through the College of Hospitality

Management and Tourism has developed a well organization and strategic program of

career counseling and job placement to support students and young alumni. Establishing

and expanding the both local and International firms for possible job placement and

assistance is another major responsibility of the University. Employability from the

universities is subsequently producing graduates the competent to the impacts upon all

parts of Academic life. In terms of delivery of academic modules and activities outside

academic studies. Employment and Employability are two different aspects, being

employed signifies having a job, whereas being employable signifies possessing the

qualities necessary to sustain employment and progress in the work environment.

Measuring quality in higher education and comparing quality across nations in the

term of impossible task. Higher education graduates are prepared for working life, the

development towards mass higher education has led to a growing concern about several

aspects of quality. However studies have shown that there has been a serious gap in the
education system that arises from having curricula that are unsuitable in providing

graduates opportunities for employment,

Background of the Study

Employability as the ability of a graduate to get a satisfying job, stating that

job acquisition should not be prioritized over preparedness for employment to

avoid measure of individual employability. Employability is not a set of skills but a

range of experiences and attributes developed through higher-level learning, thus

employability is not a product but a process of learning. Employability continues to

develop because the graduate, once employed, does not stop learning. Thus

employability is about learning, not least learning how to learn, and it is about

empowering learners as critical reflective citizens it is important for it to

emphasizes employability of graduates, to be able to provide insight about how to

measure graduates‘ employability and what are the differences between graduates

and experienced individuals in labor market. (Lee Harvey, 2005)

While there are variations in the classification of employability, there is a

broad understanding of what qualities, characteristics, skills and knowledge

constitute employability both in general, and specifically for graduates. Employers

expect graduates to have technical and discipline competences from their degrees

but require graduates also to demonstrate a range of broader skills and attributes

that include team-working, communication, leadership, critical thinking, problem

solving and managerial abilities. • It is arguable that specific definitions are less

important than an agreed focus on approaches to promote such transferable skills

and fostering attributes that will enable graduates to find appropriate employment,

progress in their work and thus facilitate the success of their organizations and

contribute to society and the economy.

They say "Experience is the best Teacher" Experience comprises

knowledge skills or observation of something or some event gained through

involvement or exposure to the things or event. it is a "know-how" or procedural

knowledge rather than prepositional knowledge. (As cited by Marzan, 2009)

Buted (2009) investigated the competency-based curriculum enrichment of

HRM Education in the context of Asian Hospitality Business Experiences. He

posited that the philosophy of education in Southeast Asian countries is developing

the potential of individuals in a holistic and integrated manner, to achieve the fullest

potential for all by giving quality education to provide high quality human resources

and to help their students discover their own talents, make the best of these talents

and realize their full potential.

Work is becoming increasingly common among college students. Research

suggests that such work may not be harmful, and may even be helpful for

graduates. Work appears to have no negative effects of the student's GPAs, and

it may have a positive effect. (Buendia, 2010).

School year employment might increases the quantity or productivity of

study time if it complements academic effort, for example by increasing motivation

or "future-orientedness". Thus, the net effect of school year employment on college

academic outcomes is theoretically ambiguous. Given the rise in the return to skill

in recent years, though, any impact of school year employment on human capital
formation probably has larger earnings consequences today than it did in the past.

(www.answers.com).

This study primarily determined the employability of the graduates of Hotel and

Restaurant Management of Laguna State Polytechnic University 2014-2016. Specifically,

it sought to determine the job placement profile of the graduates and relevance of school

related factors to job placement. It also identified the work related values and skills that

contribute in meeting the demands of the present job. Furthermore, this research proposes

a program to improve employment rate for Hotel and Restaurant Management graduates

of Laguna State Polytechnic University.

Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework is presented in the form of paradigm below:

WORK RELATED VALUES EMPLOYABILITY OF

AND SKILLS DEMANDS ON BSHRM GRADUATES LSPU
THE PRESENT JOB. STA CRUZ, LAGUNA 2014-
2016.

Figure I. Theoretical Paradigm

The book by Dearing was related to the present study. The understanding

of employability can be seen to be more complicated than the emphasis that has

placed on student's personal qualities, which suggests less emphasis on these

qualities and more on generic academic skills. However, it could be assumed that
the individual's personal skills could have considerable bearing on a particular

student's success in the employability stakes.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

The conceptual framework is presented in the form of paradigm below:

IV DV

Competencies Employability Status

 Communication Skills
 Job Relevance
 Self-Management Skills
 Job Movement
 Academic Performance
 Work Status

Frame I Frame II

Figure II. Research Paradigm of the Study

Frame I. consist of the independent variable which contains the

competencies of employability graduates in terms of communication skills, self-

management skills and academic performance.

Frame II. Consist of dependent variable which contains the level of

employability status in terms of job relevance, job movement and work status.
Statement of the Problem

The aim of the study is to determine the Employability of the graduates of

Hotel and Restaurant Management of Laguna State Polytechnic University 2014-2016.

Specifically it seeks to answer the following questions:

1.) What are the Competencies Status of BSHRM Graduates in terms of:

1.1 Communication Skills

1.2 Self-Management

1.3 Academic Performance

2.) What is the mean level of Employability Graduates of BSHRM in terms of:

2.1 Job Relevance

2.2 Job Movement

2.3 Work Status

3.) Is there a significant relationship between the Competencies to the

Employability Status of BSHRM Graduates Sta. Cruz Laguna Year 2014-2016?

Research Hypothesis

There is a significance relationship between Competencies and to the

Employability status of BSHRM Graduates Year 2014-2016.

Significance of the Study

This study primarily determined the employability of the graduates of Hotel

and Restaurant Management of Laguna State Polytechnic University from 2014-

2016. Specifically, it sought to determine the job placement profile of the graduates

and relevance of school related factors to job placement. It also identified the work

related values and skills that contribute in meeting the demands of the present job.

Furthermore, this research proposes a program to improve employment rate for

Hotel and Restaurant Management graduates of Laguna State Polytechnic

University.

Scope and Limitation of the Study

This study is limited only in finding out to determine the Employability of the

graduates of Hotel and Restaurant Management of Laguna State Polytechnic

University from 2014-2016, in seventy five (75) respondents.

Definition of Terms

For better understanding of the terms use in the study the following

variables were defined:

Employability. A set of achievements, understandings and personal

attributes that make individuals more likely to gain employment and to be

successful in their chosen occupations.

Academic Performance. It refers to the Grade Point Average of student,

their overall knowledge and skills acquired in attending school subjects at

Laguna State Polytechnic University.

Self-Management Skills. It refers to the personal application of behavior

change tactics that produces a desired change in behavior.

Communication Skills. It refers in the workplace it is all about being able

to convey information to people clearly and skillfully.

Job Relevance. It refers to the previous work, jobs, training, that a person

has in preparation for a new job for which he/she is applying.

Job Movement. Refers to move either within your current company or to

a new organization with similar title, pay, and responsibility.

Work Status. is the position of an individual in relation to another or

others.
 CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND RELATED STUDIES

This chapter presents the review of related literature and review

studies.

RELATED LITERATURE

Employability

Hillage & Pollard, (2007). Government policy to enhance the employability

of graduates is part of a wider strategy to extend the skills base in the UK (Coopers

& Lybrand, 2009). This interest in employability is associated with human capital

theories of innovation and economic performance. Growth in the stock of human

capital is essential for economic growth, and hence the government’s agenda is

driven by the desire to stem the ‘productivity shortfall’. The HE system is therefore

being steered to place greater emphasis on the employability of graduates.

Morley (2009) suggests that HEIs both mediate and manage government

policy, and that the boundaries between the academy, government and

businesses have loosened and been reformed. This raises the question of what

the purpose of HE is, whether it is to provide to the workforce of the future or

educational stimulus, or both. Jackson (2008) suggests that the recent government

agenda for the basification of HE, widening participation, the key

skills/employability agenda, lifelong learning etc., are leading to the unification of

HE and by implication, the curtailing of academic freedoms. Innovation in

education is complex although government, and others, persist in treating it as

something simple, to be planned, delivered and evaluated.

COMMUNICATION SKILLS

Coopers and Lybrand (2008) define ‘employability skills’ in terms of four key

areas: traditional intellectual skills, critical evaluation, logical argument, Key skills

– communication, IT, Personal attributes – motivation, self-reliance and

Knowledge of organizations and how they work. There are several synonyms -

core, key, generic, personal transferable skills, common, work or employment

related skills – this is another of the reasons why it is difficult to conceptualize what

is meant by employability skills. Added to that, ‘skills’ are often referred to as

capabilities, competencies or attributes, levels or learning outcomes, thus

compounding the sense of confusion.

It is possible that employers’ criticisms of the shortcomings of graduate

recruits are not so much the result of failure in the HE curriculum, rather of failure

in the transfer process. questions how transferable key skills are into employment

contexts. Eraut (2008) sees transfer as a learning process in its own right, although

this may be easier for skills in relation to objects such as using particular computer

packages, rather than the ‘softer’ skills of interacting with and managing people

effectively. Brown (2007) believes that learning, and the transfer of that learning,

is most likely to be effective if the learning situation closely resembles the work

place. Knight and Yorke (2008) believe that if there is any hope of transferring the

learning from one context to another, the learner needs to use that learning in a
variety of different situations. From these comments, it would seem that practice

in a number of contexts is fundamental for the development of employability skills

and attributes.

Brennan et al. (2008) in a survey of graduates across Europe and the UK

found that UK graduates rated teamwork, working under pressure, oral

communication skills and problem solving in the top ten skills competencies they

viewed as important. In contrast, none of these appeared in the list of

competencies rated highly by European graduates, instead they highlighted

learning abilities, working independently and written communication skills.

Self-Management

According to Porce (2007) Self-management plans are used to teach

students to independently complete tasks and take an active role in monitoring and

reinforcing their own behavior. An important goal in education is to foster self-

reliance and independence. In fact, self-management strategies can be

implemented before any problem behaviors occur. Research studies show that

self-management strategies can be used to improve academic performance,

productivity, time on-task, and to decrease problem behavior. The ability to use

self-management strategies effectively is a skill that becomes very important for

success as children grow into adulthood. The critical elements of self-management

include setting goals, monitoring behavior, and evaluating progress. Examples of

self-management include self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and self-reinforcement.

 Reili (2008) stated that Self-management skills refer to steps, strategies,

and skills that individuals can use toward the achievement of goals. Some

examples include organizing study materials, setting goals, and monitoring

progress. Teaching self-management skills will prepare students in environments

where there is little guidance structure and monitoring.* Explain to students that

the material in GED classes may be new to them and therefore they should use

strategies that can help them to stay organized and meet their goals.

Academic Performance

Based from the book of Erhenberg (2009) academic performance as to how

students deal with their studies and how they cope with on accomplish in different

tasks given to them by their teachers. Academic performance is the ability to study

and remember facts and being able to communicate knowledge verbally or down

on paper. This reading is significant to aid the researcher in knowing how to gather

pertinent data that will elicit the answers to the present problem.

Bell M (2009) relates academic performance to success.in educational

institutions, success is measured by academic performance, or how a student

meets standards set by local government and the attention of parents, legislators

and education departments.

As mentioned by Erhenberg, the above literature is related to the present

studies because school year employment truly affects the academic performance

of the students. The positive effect is the experience that can be use in attending

school.
Job Relevance

Loretto (2007), believe that employees value employer who understand and

possess willingness to work hard. In addition to working hard it is also important to

work smart. This means learning the most efficient way to complete tasks and

finding ways to core about your job and complete all projects while maintaining a

positive attitude. Doing more than is expected on the job is a good time

management that utilize good time management skills and don’t waste valuable

company time.

J. Beltran (2009) Employees, whatever their degree of responsibilities may

be, are committed to pursuing the quality of work and job relevance to the

provisions for training opportunities is an important as selection of the specific skills

to maximize individual’s job performance.

The quality of our jobs and work environments determines our quality life.

Giving higher priority to improving the quality of work will have numerous benefits

for individual workers.

Job Movement

In (2013), Harvey indicated that an employee is accepted as part of the

social group or team. Most staff has an acute need that their contribution is

worthwhile, appreciated, and acknowledged. Organizations need to look beyond

the traditional economic incentives of career opportunities and salaries to other

social and lifestyle factors outside the workplace. Similarly, Kingira and Mescib

(2010) concluded that, different opinions between the employees in terms of

behavioral statements which can be “Social opportunities providing at the highest

level with working period leads the employee to achieve their goals of the

organization.” Therefore, a social opportunity for the employee is used to boost

their motivation level and ultimately helps in achieving the goals and objectives of

the organization.

If we talk the motivation dimension that enhances organization

performance, training used to enhance the skills, efficiency, and knowledge of

employees for doing a particular job during their earlier career stage because it

familiarizes them with the organizations goals, rules, and regulations and the

working conditions in one hand since updates and amendments take place in

technology, purchasing a new equipment, changes in technique of production, and

computer impartment. The employees are trained for use of new equipment’s and

work methods. Training molds the thinking of employees and leads to quality

performance of employees. Supervisors believe that older workers are less

motivated to learn, less flexible, and do not want to take part in training programs.

So, companies do not invest in training or development opportunities for older

people. In turn, older workers become less self-confident due to the lack of support

in terms of training and their skills rapidly become outdated (Van Vianen et al.

2009).

Williams et al. (2008) argues that the job satisfaction works toward making

good relationships with staff and colleagues, control of time off, enough resources,

and bring autonomy for employee in the organization. It is essential in the stages

of employment i.e., early, middle, and late career stage of life because it brings
any combination of physiological, psychological, satisfaction that invokes a person

truthfully to say I am satisfied with my current job and it leads to employee

motivation to achieve goals of the organization. Job satisfaction refers doing a job

one enjoys, and being rewarded for one’s accomplishment. It is the key ingredient

that leads to recognition, income, promotion, and the achievement of other goals

that lead to a feeling of fulfillment of the desired goals and objectives (Kaliski 2007).

Work Status

They are strongly committed to work and they work full-time (Freidson

2007). These statements, however, do not cover all the professions and

professionals. Firstly, commitment to work varies between professions and

professionals. Some report relatively weak commitment (Mastekaasa 2009).

Secondly, it is well documented that a significant number of professionals work

part-time, partly because they prefer reduced hours, and partly because of lack of

full-time positions.

Underemployment seems mainly to be a problem within fields where part

time work is widespread, particularly within the nursing professions

Overemployment is supposed to exist mainly within male dominated professions

like medicine and law In Norway, as in most European countries, about twenty per

cent of the employees report either underemployment or overemployment.

RELATED STUDIES

Communication Skills

Kiser (2007) stated to this study that the workplace, you are going to be

working as a team with other people, so it is important to be open to others’

thoughts and opinion no matter how much you may or may not agree with them. If

you are having trouble understanding someone else’s point of view, consider

putting yourself in their shoes and see why they might have acted the way they

did. Also, asking questions is a good way to improve workplace communication.

As mentioned by Kiser, communication skills are important in the workplace,

it will reflect the result of your work. Improving skill is necessary enhancing the

skills.

Self-Management Skills

Rishu Roy (2007) as cited by Delgado (2009) Self-management skills are

those abilities that allow an employee to feel more productive when doing daily

routine regardless of the working environment. Well-developed self-management

skills will help you efficiently communicate with co-workers, management and

customers, make right decisions, plan your working time, and keep your body

healthy.
Academic Performance

Lasala (2007) Contemporary educational theory holds that one of the pivotal

causes of inadequate school performance is the in ability of the schools to

adequately staff classrooms with qualified teachers

Another factor affecting academic performance is the students study habit.

In the field research done by Lasala he found that the study habit and academic

performance of college students has a low to moderate relationship.

Job Relevance

Tamondong (2009) identified in her study the relevance of technical training

obtained has been considered as primary factor for the employability of graduates.

It was one of the qualification requirements for successful employment.

Job Movement

Marks (2010) studies focused on assessing the effect that quality circles

had on participating employees and found that the attitudes of employees who

participated in quality circles were influenced in the areas concerning participation,

decision making, and group communication. Although group communication was

influenced, communication through the organization as a whole was not and

neither was employee’s personal responsibility for their work. The results of this

study suggest that quality circles can provide employees with informational and

social support that can help increase their motivation. Methods for motivating

employees, the necessary effort and action towards work-related activities.

Work Status

Ampo (2007) Job status can be thought of as the willingness to expend

energy to achieve a goal or a reward status at work has been defined as ‘the sum

of the processes that influence the arousal, direction, and maintenance of

behaviors relevant to work settings.

 Chapter III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter contains the research design, population and sampling the

data gathering procedure, data gathering instrument and statistical treatment.

Research Design

Descriptive method will be used to determine the employability of BSHRM

Graduates of Laguna State Polytechnic University, Sta. Cruz Laguna Year 2014-

2016.

Descriptive research is also called Statistical research. The main goal of

this type of research is to describe the data and characteristic about what is being

studied. The idea behind this type of research is to study frequencies, averages,

and other statistical calculations. Although this research is highly accurate, is does

not gather the causes behind a situation. Descriptive research is mainly done when

a researcher wants to gain better understanding of a topic. (Sherrard, 2008)

Population and Sampling Techniques

The population of this study used was composed 100% graduates of

Bachelor of Science in Hotel and Restaurant Management of the Laguna State

Polytechnic University from year 2014-2016 by which 75 were used as

respondents using simple random sampling.

 In order to determine the employability of bshrm graduates of Laguna State

Polytechnic University, Sta. Cruz Laguna year 2014-2016, the researcher uses the

purposive sampling. The researcher’s purpose is to know the employability status

of bshrm graduates. The researcher used 75 graduates of bshrm to evaluate the

research.

Research Procedure

Before getting the data, the researcher first identifies the research problem

and it is checked and revised by the thesis adviser Prof. Leslie T. Salazar. After

the approval of the title problem is the data collection. Then the construction of the

chapter two, related literature and studies that is searched from the internet, books,

past studies and other references. And then formulate the research methodology

that was used in the study and also prepared sets of questionnaire that was

validated by the thesis adviser Prof. Leslie T. Salazar and then distributed to the

Bachelor of Science in Hotel and Restaurant Management Graduates of Laguna

State Polytechnic University. The researcher tabulated the result to produce the

data matrix were being submitted to the statistician, that will present the

interpretation of the data gathered. The data gathered were then analyzed,

computed and tabulated and interpreted, therefore the researcher prepared for the

proposal defense.
Research Instrument

To gather the data for the study, the researcher utilized a questionnaire.

The questionnaire divided into two parts, part one is consists of competencies of

employability graduates in terms of communication skills, self-management and

academic performance. The part two is consists of the employability status of

graduates in terms of job relevance, job movement and work status. The

questionnaire had a total of twenty four (24) item questions and it was distributed

with the permission of the thesis adviser Prof. Leslie T. Salazar.

First part is answerable by checking he spaces provided for the

respondents’ rate. The researcher will use the following scale: 5-Strongly Agree,

4-Agree, 3-Moderately Agree, 2-Disagree, 1-Strongly Disagree.

A Five point scale was used to determine the Employability Status of

Bachelor of Science in Hotel Restaurant Management Graduates of Laguna State

Polytechnic University.

Statistical Treatment

The data obtained was treated statistically with the used of the Mean and

Standard Deviation to determine the Employability status of BSHRM Graduates in

laguna state polytechnic university.

For descriptive presentation of variables, the frequency and percentage

were used. The formulas were:

 The spreadsheet application was used to compute the result of the study. It

was presented to the statistical for checking and validation of the computations.

Where in:

P = Percentage

F = Frequency and number of respondents

N = Total number of respondents

Weighted Mean and Standard deviation were used to determine the skills of

service attendant in different restaurant in Laguna its effect to the performance of

the restaurant.

The weighted mean is as follow:

X = mean

N = the total numbers of population

Σx = sum of all data values

The formula for standard deviation is as follow:

S = Standard Deviation

Σ = means “sum of”

X = each value in the data set

X = means of all values in the data value

N = total number of values in the data set

The data collected and treated by used of person formula

Where;

N = number of pairs of scores

Σxy = sum of the products of paired scores

Σx = sum of x scores

Σy = sum of y scores

= sum of squared x scores

= sum of squared y scores

The likert scale will be used as the basis in order to interpret the result

gathered after distributing the questionnaire

Legend:

VERBAL
SCALE REMARKS INTERPRETATION
5 4.21-5.00 STRONGLY AGREE
4 3.41-4.20 AGREE
3 2.61-3.40 MODERATELY AGREE
2 1.81-2.60 DISAGREE
1 1.00-1.80 STRONGLY DISAGREE
Table No 1: Five – Point Likert Scale
 Chapter IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter consists of the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data

gathered from seventy five (75) BSHRM Graduates of Laguna State Polytechnic

University, Year 2014-2016.

A. Profile of the Respondents

The following figure shows the profile of the respondents in terms of age,

gender and place of works.

Figure 1. A Pie Graph showing the frequency and percentage of

distribution of respondent’s age.

Age of Respondents
0%

30%

45%

1st Qtr

Figure 1. Indicates that 45% or Forty (40) respondents were within the age
bracket of 18-23 years old, while 30% or Thirty (30) were within the age
bracket of 23-27 years old.
 Figure 2. A Pie Graph showing the frequency and percentage of
distribution
of respondent’s gender.

Gender of the Respondents

0% 0%

27%

48%

Figure 2 indicates that 48% or forty eight (48) respondents are male while

the other 27% or twenty seven (27) are female which reveals that the most

respondents are male.

 Figure 4. A Pie Graph showing the frequency and percentage of

distribution of respondent’s place of works.

Place of Work of the Respondents

24%

49%

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr

As shows in Figure 3, the respondent’s place of works indicates that in the

total number of seventy five (75) respondents, 49% or forty nine (49) are working

at the Restaurants, while 24% or twenty four (24) are working in the Hotels, and

2% or two (2) working at the vessel, on this figure revealed that restaurants is the

most job satisfaction of the respondents.

 Table 1: The Mean level of competencies of BSHRM Graduates in

terms of Communication Skills

COMMUNICATION SKILLS
MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION REMARKS
Q1 4.253333 0.85571739 STRONGLY AGREE
Q2 4.133333 0.934812213 AGREE
Q3 4.306667 0.63614832 STRONGLY AGREE
Q4 4.466667 0.664410597 STRONGLY AGREE
TOTAL 4.29 0.400675106 STRONGLY AGREE
Legend REMARKS
4.21-5.00 STRONGLY AGREE
3.41-4.20 AGREE
2.61-3.40 MODERATELY AGREE
1.81-2.60 DISAGREE
1.00-1.80 STRONGLY DISAGREE

The table 1 shows the mean status of employability BSHRM graduates of

Laguna State Polytechnic University. In terms of Communication Skills

corresponding to question number 1 which is I was able to communicate well got

a weighted mean level of 4.25 and 0.85 as its standard deviation are verbally

interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. Question number 2 which is I was delivering of

message and information clear got a weighted mean level 4.13 and 0.93 as its

Standard Deviation are verbally interpreted as “Agree”. and question number 3

which is I was mindfully paying attention got a weighted mean of 4.30 and 0.63 as

its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted of “Strongly Agree” question

number 4 which is I can handle difficult people got a weighted mean of 0.46 and

0.66 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. The

total weighted mean of 4.29 and 0.40 as its Standard Deviation was verbally

interpreted as “Strongly Agree”.

 Table 2: The Mean level of competencies of BSHRM Graduates in

terms of Self-Management Skills

SELF-MANAGEMENT SKILLS
MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION REMARKS
Q1 4.293333 1.010396408 STRONGLY AGREE
Q2 4.066667 1.106898923 AGREE
Q3 4.226667 0.966651134 STRONGLY AGREE
Q4 4.506667 0.503322296 STRONGLY AGREE
TOTAL 4.273333 0.551676397 STRONGLY AGREE
Legend REMARKS
4.21-5.00 STRONGLY AGREE
3.41-4.20 AGREE
2.61-3.40 MODERATELY AGREE
1.81-2.60 DISAGREE
1.00-1.80 STRONGLY DISAGREE

The table 2 shows the mean status of employability BSHRM graduates of

Laguna State Polytechnic University. In terms of Self-Management Skills

corresponding to question number 1 which is I am well-organized in work, got a

weighted mean level of 4.29 and 1.01 as its Standard Deviation was verbally

interpreted as “Strongly Agree” question number 2 which is I do my task without

supervision, got a mean level of 4.06 and 1.10 as its Standard Deviation was

verbally interpreted as “Agree”. Question number 3 which is I show calmness in

my job, got a mean level of 4.22 and 0.96 as its Standard Deviation was verbally

interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. Question number 4 which is I show professional

in my job, got a mean level of 4.50 and 0.50 as its Standard Deviation was verbally

interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. The total weighted mean of 4.27 and 0.50 as its

Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”.

 Table 3: The Mean level of Competencies of BSHRM Graduates in

terms of Academic Performance

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION REMARKS
Q1 3.88 1.251593579 AGREE
Q2 4.093333 1.002339605 AGREE
Q3 4.186667 0.895836214 AGREE
Q4 4.453333 0.576413265 STRONGLY AGREE
TOTAL 4.153333 0.468416924 AGREE
Legend REMARKS
4.21-5.00 STRONGLY AGREE
3.41-4.20 AGREE
2.61-3.40 MODERATELY AGREE
1.81-2.60 DISAGREE
1.00-1.80 STRONGLY DISAGREE

The table 3 shows the mean status of employability BSHRM graduates

of Laguna State Polytechnic University. In terms of Academic Performance

question number 1 which is I have achievements on school, got a weighted mean

of 3.88 and 1.25 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Agree”.

Question number 2 which is I have no subject’s repeated, got a weighted mean of

4.09 and 1.00 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Agree”.

Question number 3 which is My general waited average is high, got a mean level

of 4.18 and 0.89 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Agree”.

Question number 4 which is My general average is very satisfactory, got a mean

level of 4.45 and 0.57 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as

“Strongly Agree”. The total weighted mean 4.15 and 0.46 as its Standard

Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Agree”.

 Table 4: The Mean Level of Employability status of BSHRM

Graduates in terms of Job Relevance

JOB RELEVANCE
MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION REMARKS
Q1 4.16 1.065934433 AGREE
Q2 4.2 0.92998111 AGREE
Q3 4.266667 0.859499121 STRONGLY AGREE
Q4 4.28 0.923565359 STRONGLY AGREE
TOTAL 4.226667 0.439158696 STRONGLY AGREE
Legend REMARKS
4.21-5.00 STRONGLY AGREE
3.41-4.20 AGREE
2.61-3.40 MODERATELY AGREE
1.81-2.60 DISAGREE
1.00-1.80 STRONGLY DISAGREE

Table 4 shows the mean status of employability BSHRM graduates of

Laguna State Polytechnic University. In terms of Job Relevance question number

1 which is my current job is vertically in line with the degree finished, got a weighted

mean of 4.16 and 1.06 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as

“Agree”. Question number 2 which is my current job has task assignment in line

with the competencies, got a weighted mean of 4.2 and 0.92 as its Standard

Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Agree”. Question number 3 which is my

current job allows me to apply theories I’ve learnt from school, got a mean of 4.26

and 0.85 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”.

Question number 4 which is my current job is position I’ve prepared for, got a

weighted mean of 4.28 and 0.93 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted

as “Strongly Agree”. The total weighted mean of 4.22 and 0.43 as its Standard

Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”.

 Table 5: The Mean Level of employability status of BSHRM students

in terms of Job Movement

JOB MOVEMENT
MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION REMARKS
Q1 4.2 0.944400282 AGREE
Q2 4.146667 1.074185214 AGREE
Q3 4.4 0.569494797 STRONGLY AGREE
Q4 4.266667 1.017858554 STRONGLY AGREE
TOTAL 4.253333 0.422135284 STRONGLY AGREE
Legend REMARKS
4.21-5.00 STRONGLY AGREE
3.41-4.20 AGREE
2.61-3.40 MODERATELY AGREE
1.81-2.60 DISAGREE
1.00-1.80 STRONGLY DISAGREE

Table 5 shows the mean status of employability BSHRM graduates of

Laguna State Polytechnic University. In terms of Job Movement question number

1 which is I was able to get a job after graduation, got a mean of 4.2 and 0.94 as

its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Agree”. Question number 2

which is I was able to be promoted on a higher position, got a weighted mean of

4.14 and 1.07 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Agree”.

Question number 3 which is I was able to be assigned to another department or

branch of firm, got a weighted mean of 4.26 and 1.01 as its Standard Deviation

was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. Question number 4 which is I was

able to move from other country to acquire relevant competencies, got a mean of

4.26 and 1.01 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Strongly

Agree”. The total weighted mean of 4.25 and 0.42 as its Standard Deviation was

verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”.

 Table 6: The Mean Level of Employability status of BSHRM

students in terms of Work Status

WORK STATUS
MEAN STANDARD DEVIATION REMARKS
Q1 4 1.127062674 AGREE
Q2 4.306667 0.900050049 STRONGLY AGREE
Q3 4.373333 0.712311299 STRONGLY AGREE
Q4 4.333333 0.977217967 STRONGLY AGREE
TOTAL 4.253333 0.520676102 STRONGLY AGREE
Legend REMARKS
4.21-5.00 STRONGLY AGREE
3.41-4.20 AGREE
2.61-3.40 MODERATELY AGREE
1.81-2.60 DISAGREE
1.00-1.80 STRONGLY DISAGREE

Table 6 shows the mean status of employability BSHRM graduates of

Laguna State Polytechnic University. In terms of Work Status question number 1

which is my current job provides me with written statement of employment, got a

mean of 4 and 1.12 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Agree”.

Question number 2 which is my current job provides me with the opportunity to

have a permanent position, got a weighted mean of 4.30 and 0.90 as its Standard

Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. Question number 3 which

is my current job provides me with compensation in accordance with the law, got

a mean of 4.37 and 0.71 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as

“Strongly Agree”. Question number 4 which is my current job provides me with a

security through insurance program, got a mean level 4.33 and 0.97 as its

Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. The total

weighted mean of 4.25 and 0.52 as its Standard Deviation was verbally interpreted

as “Strongly Agree”.

Table 7: Significant relationship between the Competencies to the

Employability Status of BSHRM Graduates Sta. Cruz Laguna Year 2014-

2016:

COMMUNICATION SKILLS VS JOB RELEVANCE

CRITICAL
MEAN SD R-VALUE FINDINGS
VALUE
COMMUNICATION
4.29 0.400675 NOT
SKILLS 0.158973516 0.227164352
SIGNIFICANT
JOB RELEVANCE 4.226667 0.439159

COMMUNICATION SKILLS VS JOB MOVEMENT

CRITICAL
MEAN SD R-VALUE FINDINGS
VALUE
COMMUNICATION
4.29 0.400675 - NOT
SKILLS 0.227164352
0.01577943 SIGNIFICANT
JOB MOVEMENT 4.253333 0.422135

COMMUNICATION SKILLS VS WORK STATUS

MEAN SD R-VALUE CRITICAL VALUE FINDINGS
COMMUNICATION
4.29 0.400675
SKILLS 0.266549648 0.227164352 SIGNIFICANT
WORK STATUS 4.253333 0.520676

SELF-MANAGEMENT SKILLS VS JOB RELEVANCE

MEAN SD R-VALUE CRITICAL VALUE FINDINGS

SELF-MANAGEMENT
4.273333 0.551676
SKILLS -0.20340352 0.227164352 NOT SIGNIFICANT
JOB RELEVANCE 4.226667 0.439159
 SELF-MANAGEMENT SKILLS VS JOB MOVEMENT
CRITICAL
MEAN SD R-VALUE FINDINGS
VALUE
SELF-
MANAGEMENT 4.273333 0.551676 NOT
0.054062084 0.227164352
SKILLS SIGNIFICANT
JOB MOVEMENT 4.253333 0.422135

SELF-MANAGEMENT SKILLS VS WORK STATUS

MEAN SD R-VALUE CRITICAL VALUE FINDINGS
SELF-
MANAGEMENT 4.273333 0.551676 -
0.227164352 NOT SIGNIFICANT
SKILLS 0.22079927
WORK STATUS 4.253333 0.520676

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE VS JOB RELEVANCE

CRITICAL
MEAN SD R-VALUE FINDINGS
VALUE
ACADEMIC
4.153333 0.468417
PERFORMANCE 0.025838956 0.227164352 NOT SIGNIFICANT
JOB RELEVANCE 4.226667 0.439159

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE VS JOB MOVEMENT

CRITICAL
MEAN SD R-VALUE FINDINGS
VALUE
ACADEMIC
4.153333 0.468417
PERFORMANCE 0.023008281 0.227164352 NOT SIGNIFICANT
JOB MOVEMENT 4.253333 0.422135

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE VS WORK STATUS

MEAN SD R-VALUE CRITICAL VALUE FINDINGS
ACADEMIC
4.153333 0.468417
PERFORMANCE -0.06099435 0.227164352 NOT SIGNIFICANT
WORK STATUS 4.253333 0.520676

As indicated in table 7, shows significant relationship to competencies to

the employability status of BSHRM Graduates year 2014-2016 of Laguna State

Polytechnic University. The computed R-Value of 0.1589, 0.0157 are greater than

the Critical Value of 0.2271, indicates to the Communication skills Vs Job

Relevance, Communication Skills Vs Job Movement are “Not Significant”. And

the Computer r- value of 0.2665 are less than to the critical value of 0.2271 it

indicates to Communication Skills Vs Work Status are “Significant”.

The computer R-Value of -0.2034, 0.0540, 0.2207 are greater than the

Critical Value of 0.2271, it indicates to the employability status in terms of Self-

Management Vs Job Relevance, Self-Management Vs Job Movement, Vs Work

status are “Not Significant”.

The computer R-Value of 0.0258, 0.0230, 0.0690 are greater than the

Critical Value of 0.2271 which revealed the Academic Performance Vs Job

Relevance, Academic Performance Vs Job Movement, Academic Performance Vs

Work Status are “Not Significant”.

 Chapter V

SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS ANDRECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusion and recommendation

of the study.

Summary

This research work entitled “The Employability of BSHRM Graduates of

Laguna State Polytechnic University Year 2014-2016” respond to the question: 1.

What are the Competencies Status of BSHRM Graduates in terms of 1.1

Communication Skills; 1.2 Self-Management; 1.3 Academic Performance?,

followed by question number 2. What is the Level of Employability Graduates of

BSHRM in terms of 2.1 Job Relevance 2.2 Job Movement 2.3 Work Status? Then

question number 3. Is there a significant relation to employability status of BSHRM

Graduates Year 2014-2016?

The respondents of the study were seventy five (75) BSHRM Graduates of

Laguna State Polytechnic University, Sta. Cruz Laguna Year 2014-2016.

Purposive Sampling was used in selecting the respondents.

The descriptive method of the research was utilized to gather the needed

data from consistent source of information for the study. The questionnaire was

used as the main tool in order to acquire vital information about the problem. After

gathering, the statistical treatment applied were the mean and standard deviation

and so with the regression to find the Employability of BSHRM Graduates of

Laguna State Polytechnic University, Sta. Cruz Laguna Year 2014-2016.

Findings

Based on the data gathered, the study brought the following findings:

1. The overall mean of competencies of BSHRM Graduates in terms of

Communication Skills got an overall mean score of of 4.29 and verbally

interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. The Self-Management got an overall mean

score of 4.27 and verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”. Academic

Performance got an overall mean score of 4.15 and verbally interpreted as

“Agree”.

2. While in Work Status got an overall mean of 4.25 and verbally interpreted

as “Strongly Agree”. Moreover, Job Relevance got an overall mean of 4.25

and verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree” lastly, Job Movement got an

overall mean of 4.15 and verbally interpreted as “Strongly Agree”

3. Communication Skills has no significant relationship to employability Status

while Self-Management and Academic Performance has significant

relationship to employability status of graduates.

Conclusions

Based on the findings of the study the following conclusions were drawn:

1. The Level of Competencies of BSHRM Graduates in terms of Communications

Skills showed that employees have effective and efficient skills as they

possessed the high quality of professional characteristics. While the self-

management showed techniques and method on how to understand their

responsibilities and duties so that they can work effectively. Also when it

comes to Academic Performance, the employees showed knowledge and

knew very well etiquettes and business practice of hotel and restaurant locally

and abroad.

2. For On the data gathered it was clear that the Graduates of BSHRM Strongly

Agree in terms of level employability in terms of Work Status, the employees

always put theories and principles in competitiveness and excellent skills in

their job performance as graduated as BSHRM Laguna State Polytechnic

University.

3. The BSHRM Graduates Employability significantly affects the competencies

status in terms of Communication Skills as rated by the employees, therefore

the null hypothesis was rejected and it indicates that the employability of

BSHRM can be considered as influencing factor for jab satisfaction.

Recommendations

On the basis of these conclusions, the following are recommended.

1. Students with high skills, knowledge and work values should maintain

it to be a productive graduates. The College of Hotel and Restaurant

Management and Tourism must establish more linkages with hospitality

establishments like restaurants and hotels for the effective program that

would enhance the future employment ratings of its graduate.

2. The University should find a way to retain and enhance the overall level

of employability and competitiveness of graduates. And also CHMT may

regularly update once a year the status of their graduates and ask for

possible curriculum enhancement programs they could offer at the College.

The CHMT faculty may encourage the students to be more motivated to

work hard and persevere in whatever task and project assigned to them to

develop their sense of responsibility and leadership. Their competencies

may be further strengthened through exposure to various competitions and

other related training and seminars. Further students should be encouraged

continue to participate in the English Proficiency Programs to further

enhance their oral and written communication skills.

3. Work skills and values of the HRM students must be further emphasized

in the application of the outcomes based curriculum. Faculty Members

teaching General Education and Professional Subjects may be encouraged

to continue to update and enhance teaching skills through various re

training programs facilitated by the university. The CITHM must continue to

tap linkages that will bring possible employment opportunities for its

graduates.
BIBLIOGRAPY
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Published Materials

Erhenberg & Bell M “Youth Employment; Academic Performance and

Variables”, 2009

Kiser (2007) “Communication Skills and Practical Values”, 2009

Hillage & Pollard, (2007). “Employability Skills”. Trade Publishing, 2007

Graffama, Joseph. Al, “Employs benefits and Management”, 2008

Loretto, “Human Dilema in Hospitality of Leadership, New York and

London”, 2007

Unpublished Materials

Ampo,”Employees Performance and Job Knowledge” (LSPU SAN PABLO

LAGUNA, 2007)

Marks “Assessment of on the student work behavior DHRM effect to the job

training student performance A.Y. 2011-2012” (LSPU Santa Cruz Laguna)

Tamondong “Determine the effevtivess of Academic Performance” (LSPU

SAN PABLO, 2011)

Lasala “Academic Performance of Filipino students and United Arab

Emirates amd overseas Filipino workers children in the philippines” 2007

 A. Website

(http://www.accessmylibrary.com)
(http://www.answer.com)
(http://businessdictionary.com)
(http://www.resource-bnet.com)
APPENDICES
 APPENDIX A

Republic of the Philippines

Laguna State Polytechnic University

Province of Laguna
College of Hospitality Management and Tourism

CHARMAINE V. RIVERA, MIHM

Dean, CHMT
LSPU-System

Madam:

Greetings!
I’m Mr. Patrick Joshua C. Orioste, 4th year student taking Bachelor of
Science in Hotel and Restaurant Management at Laguna State Polytechnic
University Sta. Cruz, Laguna and currently working on my thesis entitled
“EMPLOYABILTY OF BSHRM GRADUATES LAGUNA STATE POLYTECHNIC
UNIVERSITY STA. CRUZ LAGUNA YEAR 2014-2016”. To be submitted to the
faculty of the College of Hospitality Management and Tourism , as a partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the Bachelor of Science in Hotel and Restaurant
Management.
In connection with my research paper of May I request from your good office
to please allow me to distribute my questionnaire to the BSHRM graduates for the
completion of my research.
I am hoping for your kind approval regarding this matter. Thank you and God
bless.

Respectfully yours, Noted by

PATRICK JOSHUA C. ORIOSTE LESLIE T. ZALASAR

Student Researcher Thesis Adviser

Approved/Disapproved
CHARMAINE V. RIVERA, MINH
Dean, CHMT
 APPENDIX B
Republic of the Philippines
LAGUNA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
Province of Laguna
College of Hospitality Management amd T ourism
SURVEY STRUCTED QUESTIONNAIRE
Ma’am/Sir

Good day!

I’m humbly inviting you to participate in research study entitled:

EMPLOYABILITY OF BSHRM GRADUATES LSPU STA CRUZ, LAGUNA
YEAR 2014-2016. I am a student from Laguna State Polytechnic University
Sta. Cruz Main Campus taking up Bachelor of Science in Hotel and
Restaurant Management. I am asking your permission to answer this
questionnaire that will lead of my research. I assure you that your answer to
the questionnaire will be treated confidentially.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely yours,

Patrick Joshua C. Orioste

Student Researcher
I. Respondent’s Profile
Name: Sex: Civil Status:

Age: 18-22 28-32 38 and above Male Single

23-27 33-37 Female Married

Companies: Hotels Restaurants

Vessels Airlines

II. Check (√) the corresponding box based on your preference.

5- Strongly Agree

4- Agree

3- Moderately Agree

2- Disagree

1- Strongly Disagreed

Communication Skills in the workplace is all about being 5 4 3 2 1

able to convey information to people clearly and simply.
1. I was able to communicate well.
2. I was Deliverance of message and information is
clear.

3.
I was mindfully paying attention.
4. I was handle difficult people.
Self-Management Skills is the personal application of 5 4 3 2 1
behavior change tactics that produces a desired change in
behavior.
1. Well- organized in work.
2. Do his/her task without supervision.

3. Show calmness in his/her job.

4. Show professionalism in his/her job.

Academic Performance is very wide-ranging and covers a 5 4 3 2 1

broad variety of educational outcomes.
1. Have achievements on school.
2. There’s no subject repeated
3. General Waited Average is high
4. General Waited Average is very satisfactory
Job Relevance is a previous work, jobs, training, that a 5 4 3 2 1
person has in preparation for a new job for which he/she is
applying.
1. My current job is vertically in line with the degree
finished.

2. My current job has task assignment in line with the

competencies.

3. My current job is allows me to apply theories I’ve learnt

from school

4. My current job is the position I’ve prepared

Job Movement is a move either within your current company 5 4 3 2 1

or to a new organization with similar title, pay, and responsibility.
1. I was able to get a job after graduation.

2. I was able to be promoted on a higher position

3. I was able to be assigned to another department or

branch of firm.
4. I was able to move from other country to acquire
relevant competencies.
Work Status is the position of an individual in relation to 5 4 3 2 1
another or others.
1. My current job provides me with written statement of
employment.

2. My current job provides me with opportunity to help

permanent position
3. My current job provides me with compensation with
accordance with the law.
4. My current job provides me with a security through
insurance program
 DATA MATRIX

PART I: COMPETENCIES
IN TERMS OF COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 MEAN
4 3 5 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
4 5 3 5 4.25
1 1 4 4 2.5
5 4 5 5 4.75
4 5 5 5 4.75
4 1 4 5 3.5
4 4 5 5 4.5
4 4 5 1 3.5
5 4 4 4 4.25
4 5 4 5 4.5
5 3 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
3 4 5 5 4.25
5 3 4 4 4
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 4 4 4 4
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 5 5 3 4.25
5 2 5 5 4.25
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 5 4 5 4.75
5 5 5 5 5
2 4 4 5 3.75
4 3 5 5 4.25
5 5 5 4 4.75
4 5 5 5 4.75
4 5 3 4 4
4 5 5 5 4.75
3 4 4 5 4
5 5 3 4 4.25
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 5 4 4 4.5
4 5 5 4 4.5
4 1 4 4 3.25
 1 5 5 4 3.75
4 4 4 4 4
5 5 4 4 4.5
3 4 5 4 4
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 3 4 4 4
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 5 4 5 4.75
4 4 5 4 4.25
5 4 2 5 4
3 5 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 3 4 4.25
4 5 5 4 4.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 5 4 4 4.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 5 5 4 4.75
4 3 4 4 3.75
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 4 4 4 4
4 5 4 4 4.25
5 4 4 4 4.25
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 3 5 4 4.25
3 4 5 5 4.25
5 4 5 5 4.75
4 5 4 5 4.5
5 5 4 4 4.5
4 4 5 4 4.25
5 4 4 4 4.25
5 5 4 5 4.75
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 5 4 4 4.25
5 5 4 5 4.75
4.25333333 4.13333333 4.30666667 4.46666667 4.29
0.85571739 0.93481221 0.63614832 0.6644106 0.40067511
 IN TERMS OF SELF-MANAGEMENT SKILLS
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 MEAN
3 5 4 5 4.25
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 4 4 4 4.25
5 4 5 4 4.5
5 1 5 5 4
5 4 5 4 4.5
4 5 2 4 3.75
5 4 2 4 3.75
5 5 4 4 4.5
5 5 5 4 4.75
4 4 5 5 4.5
4 1 4 5 3.5
5 5 5 4 4.75
1 2 4 4 2.75
4 5 4 5 4.5
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5
5 3 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4
5 4 5 5 4.75
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 4 4 4 4
4 5 5 5 4.75
5 5 5 4 4.75
5 4 5 5 4.75
3 5 3 5 4
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 4 4.75
5 4 5 5 4.75
5 4 5 4 4.5
5 5 4 4 4.5
5 4 4 4 4.25
5 2 5 4 4
5 5 4 5 4.75
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 3 4 5 4.25
1 5 4 4 3.5
4 4 5 4 4.25
 3 5 5 5 4.5
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 5 5 4 4.75
4 1 3 4 3
4 4 1 4 3.25
1 4 5 4 3.5
5 5 5 4 4.75
5 3 5 4 4.25
5 5 5 5 5
4 5 5 5 4.75
2 3 2 4 2.75
5 5 4 5 4.75
4 4 1 5 3.5
4 4 5 5 4.5
4 1 4 4 3.25
4 5 4 5 4.5
4 5 4 5 4.5
5 4 5 4 4.5
5 5 5 4 4.75
5 4 5 5 4.75
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 2 5 5 4
2 2 4 4 3
5 5 4 4 4.5
4 5 4 4 4.25
2 5 4 5 4
4 4 2 4 3.5
5 4 5 5 4.75
4 4 3 5 4
5 4 3 4 4
5 5 5 5 5
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 2 5 4 3.75
5 5 4 5 4.75
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 4 4 4 4
4.29333333 4.06666667 4.22666667 4.50666667 4.27333333
1.01039641 1.10689892 0.96665113 0.5033223 0.5516764

IN TERMS OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 MEAN
3 4 4 4 3.75
4 4 4 4 4
5 1 4 4 3.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
3 5 5 2 3.75
5 4 4 5 4.5
1 5 4 4 3.5
4 5 5 5 4.75
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 4 5 5 4.75
5 5 5 5 5
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 4 2 5 3.75
5 1 5 4 3.75
1 4 4 5 3.5
4 5 5 4 4.5
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 4 4 4 4
2 5 5 5 4.25
5 5 4 4 4.5
4 5 3 4 4
4 5 5 5 4.75
4 4 5 4 4.25
1 4 1 4 2.5
5 4 4 4 4.25
2 5 5 5 4.25
4 2 5 5 4
4 4 2 4 3.5
4 5 4 5 4.5
5 4 4 4 4.25
4 4 5 4 4.25
4 4 5 4 4.25
4 4 2 4 3.5
1 5 5 5 4
4 5 4 4 4.25
4 5 5 4 4.5
4 1 4 5 3.5
4 4 4 4 4
3 5 3 5 4
5 4 4 5 4.5
 4 5 4 5 4.5
5 5 5 5 5
5 3 4 5 4.25
4 4 3 4 3.75
1 4 4 4 3.25
1 5 4 4 3.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 4 5 4 4.5
5 5 4 5 4.75
5 1 5 5 4
4 4 5 4 4.25
4 4 4 4 4
5 4 4 4 4.25
4 5 4 5 4.5
5 3 4 5 4.25
4 5 4 4 4.25
4 3 5 5 4.25
4 4 5 4 4.25
2 4 2 4 3
5 5 4 4 4.5
4 5 5 4 4.5
4 4 4 4 4
5 4 5 5 4.75
1 5 5 4 3.75
5 4 5 4 4.5
4 4 2 5 3.75
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 2 5 5 4
2 4 5 4 3.75
4 5 4 4 4.25
1 4 4 5 3.5
4 5 5 5 4.75
5 3 4 4 4
5 5 4 5 4.75
3.88 4.09333333 4.18666667 4.45333333 4.15333333
1.25159358 1.00233961 0.89583621 0.57641327 0.46841692

PART II: EMPLOYABILITY STATUS

IN TERMS OF JOB RELEVANCE
RESPONDENTS: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 MEAN
1 1 5 5 2 3.25
2 5 5 4 4 4.5
3 5 4 4 4 4.25
4 2 5 1 4 3
5 5 5 4 5 4.75
6 4 4 4 4 4
7 5 5 5 4 4.75
8 3 4 3 4 3.5
9 5 4 4 5 4.5
10 4 5 5 5 4.75
11 1 4 5 4 3.5
12 5 5 5 5 5
13 2 4 4 5 3.75
14 5 3 4 4 4
15 4 4 4 4 4
16 4 4 5 4 4.25
17 5 5 2 4 4
18 4 5 4 4 4.25
19 5 3 5 3 4
20 5 4 4 4 4.25
21 4 4 5 5 4.5
22 4 5 4 5 4.5
23 5 5 5 4 4.75
24 4 4 5 5 4.5
25 4 4 5 5 4.5
26 4 4 5 4 4.25
27 4 3 4 4 3.75
28 5 5 4 5 4.75
29 5 5 5 5 5
30 4 2 5 5 4
31 2 4 4 5 3.75
32 5 5 1 5 4
33 4 5 5 4 4.5
34 5 1 5 4 3.75
35 4 4 5 4 4.25
36 1 5 4 4 3.5
37 4 4 5 5 4.5
38 4 5 4 5 4.5
39 5 4 5 3 4.25
40 4 5 4 5 4.5
41 5 5 4 4 4.5
42 5 4 3 5 4.25
 43 5 5 5 5 5
44 5 5 4 3 4.25
45 4 5 4 5 4.5
46 4 2 5 5 4
47 5 2 5 5 4.25
48 4 4 4 4 4
49 4 4 5 4 4.25
50 5 5 5 5 5
51 5 2 4 5 4
52 4 5 5 4 4.5
53 5 5 5 4 4.75
54 4 5 4 4 4.25
55 5 4 5 1 3.75
56 5 4 5 5 4.75
57 4 5 4 1 3.5
58 1 4 4 5 3.5
59 4 4 4 4 4
60 4 5 4 4 4.25
61 5 5 5 4 4.75
62 5 3 4 4 4
63 4 5 5 5 4.75
64 4 5 4 5 4.5
65 4 5 4 5 4.5
66 5 3 4 5 4.25
67 4 4 2 5 3.75
68 5 4 4 5 4.5
69 5 4 4 5 4.5
70 4 2 4 5 3.75
71 4 5 4 4 4.25
72 4 4 5 1 3.5
73 5 4 5 4 4.5
74 5 4 4 4 4.25
75 2 4 4 5 3.75
4.266666 4.226666
MEAN 4.16 4.2 67 4.28 67
1.065934 0.929981 0.859499 0.923565 0.439158
SD 43 11 12 36 7

IN TERMS OF JOB MOVEMENT

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 MEAN
5 4 4 4 4.25
2 5 5 5 4.25
5 1 4 5 3.75
4 5 5 5 4.75
5 4 3 4 4
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 2 5 5 4
2 4 5 5 4
4 5 4 5 4.5
5 2 4 5 4
2 5 4 1 3
5 4 4 1 3.5
4 4 5 5 4.5
4 5 4 4 4.25
2 5 4 4 3.75
5 5 5 5 5
5 4 4 1 3.5
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 1 5 5 3.75
4 1 4 5 3.5
5 2 4 5 4
5 4 4 4 4.25
4 4 5 5 4.5
4 4 5 5 4.5
4 5 4 4 4.25
4 5 4 4 4.25
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 4 4 4 4
4 4 5 4 4.25
5 5 5 3 4.5
4 1 4 4 3.25
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 5 4 4 4.25
4 4 5 4 4.25
4 5 5 5 4.75
5 4 5 5 4.75
2 4 4 4 3.5
5 5 4 5 4.75
4 3 5 5 4.25
5 4 5 4 4.5
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
 5 4 4 5 4.5
4 5 4 5 4.5
4 4 4 1 3.25
4 5 3 5 4.25
5 5 4 5 4.75
4 5 4 5 4.5
4 5 5 4 4.5
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 5 4 4 4.25
4 5 5 4 4.5
5 4 5 4 4.5
5 2 4 4 3.75
5 5 5 4 4.75
4 4 4 5 4.25
5 5 5 4 4.75
5 4 4 4 4.25
1 5 5 4 3.75
4 5 3 4 4
4 4 5 4 4.25
4 5 5 4 4.5
4 4 4 4 4
4 5 4 1 3.5
5 3 5 4 4.25
5 5 5 4 4.75
5 5 5 4 4.75
5 5 5 4 4.75
1 5 5 5 4
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 5 4 5 4.75
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 5 5 4 4.75
4 5 4 4 4.25
5 4 5 5 4.75
4.2 4.14666667 4.4 4.26666667 4.25333333
0.94440028 1.07418521 0.5694948 1.01785855 0.42213528

IN TERMS OF WORK STATUS

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 MEAN
2 4 4 4 3.5
2 4 3 5 3.5
5 5 4 5 4.75
1 3 5 1 2.5
4 4 5 4 4.25
4 4 5 4 4.25
5 5 3 5 4.5
5 4 5 4 4.5
1 4 4 4 3.25
1 4 5 5 3.75
3 5 4 4 4
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 1 2 4 3
4 5 4 5 4.5
4 5 4 4 4.25
5 4 4 5 4.5
2 3 3 5 3.25
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4
2 4 5 1 3
5 5 5 4 4.75
5 5 4 4 4.5
2 4 3 4 3.25
4 4 4 5 4.25
4 5 5 5 4.75
5 4 5 5 4.75
5 5 3 4 4.25
4 4 5 4 4.25
4 5 3 5 4.25
5 5 4 4 4.5
5 5 4 5 4.75
4 5 5 5 4.75
4 5 5 4 4.5
4 5 5 5 4.75
4 2 5 4 3.75
4 5 4 5 4.5
4 5 5 1 3.75
1 4 5 4 3.5
4 3 5 5 4.25
 4 5 5 5 4.75
4 5 4 4 4.25
4 5 4 5 4.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
4 5 5 5 4.75
5 5 4 4 4.5
4 2 5 5 4
5 4 4 4 4.25
4 5 4 3 4
4 2 5 5 4
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 5 3 4
2 5 5 5 4.25
5 3 4 5 4.25
4 5 4 5 4.5
4 5 5 4 4.5
4 5 4 4 4.25
5 4 5 5 4.75
4 4 4 5 4.25
5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 4 4.75
4 4 4 4 4
4 5 4 4 4.25
4 2 3 5 3.5
5 4 4 5 4.5
5 4 5 3 4.25
5 5 4 5 4.75
5 5 4 1 3.75
5 5 5 5 5
3 4 5 5 4.25
4 4 5 4 4.25
4 4 5 5 4.5
5 5 5 5 5
5 4 5 5 4.75
4 5 5 4 4.5
2 5 4 5 4
4 4.30666667 4.37333333 4.33333333 4.25333333
1.12706267 0.90005005 0.7123113 0.97721797 0.5206761
CURRICULUM
VITAE
PATRICK JOSHUA COROZA ORIOSTE
238 Apolinario Mabini Street, Barangay Masikap
Liliw, Laguna 4004
+639169501335
patrickorioste_07@yahoo.com

CAREER OBJECTIVES

To obtain a position as a student trainee where I can maximize my multilayer of

management abilities utilizing the knowledge and attitude, as well as the
communication skills obtained from the course being taken.

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary: Bachelor of Science in Hotel and Restaurant Management

Laguna State Polytechnic University
Sta. Cruz, Laguna
S.Y. 2015 - present

Diploma in Hotel and Restaurant Management

Laguna State Polytechnic University
Sta. Cruz, Laguna
S.Y. 2013 - 2015

Secondary: Liliw National High School

Liliw, Laguna
S.Y. 2008-2012

Primary: Liliw Elementary School

Liliw, Laguna
S.Y. 2002 – 2008

TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Goal - oriented and Hardworking
With good communication skills
Computer Literate (Microsoft Office Word, Excel and Powerpoint)
 Good in Interpersonal and Social Collaboration
Punctual

TRAININGS AND SEMINARS ATTENDED

Molecular November 25 -
Mixology Seminar December 30, 2014
Niu by Vikings
SM Aura Premiere Pre-Practicum
Comprehensive
BGC, Taguig City
Training Exercises
February 2016
Hotel Stotsenberg
Tourism Clark, Pampanga
Sustainability and September 16-18,
Environmental 2014
Conservation
Seminar
Microtel by Airline Catering
Wyndham Seminar
Puerto Princesa Macro Asia
City Catering Services
NAIA Gate 3, Pasay
September 25-27,
City
2015
July 24, 2013

On-the-Job Hotel
Training Familiarization
Astoria Plaza Seminar and Tour
Ortigas Business Sofitel Luxury Hotel
District Pasay City
Pasig City July 24-25, 2013

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Age : 19
Sex : Male
Date of Birth : May 7, 1997
Place of Birth : Liliw, Laguna
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Roman Catholic
Height : 5’10
Weight : 170 lbs.
Language Spoken : Filipino, English
Father’s Name : Pedro E. Orioste
Mother’s Name : Julita C. Orioste

CHARACTER REFERENCES
1. Capt. Paulino Montejo
Barangay Captain, Barangay Masikap
Liliw, Laguna

2. Mr. Bobby Camello

Manager, Arabela (Bakehause And Coffee Shop)
Liliw, Laguna

3. Mrs. Leslie T. Salazar

Associate Dean, CHMT
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Sta. Cruz, Laguna

***Contact information available upon request.

I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct

with the best of my knowledge.

_________________________
PATRICK JOSHUA C. ORIOSTE
Applicant