Elastic-Wave Acquisition Systems
Elastic-Wave Acquisition Systems
ABSTRACT
CREWES has designed and built an omni-directional geophone and cable set for the
University of Calgary’s Geometrics Strataview 60 seismograph. This lightweight system
has been field-tested and has given good results. Along with this geophone system we
have also been testing various plates and blocks for hammer seismic energy sources.
These can generate both P-wave and S-wave energy, depending on the design.
A new acoustic modelling tank has been acquired and measuring four feet square and
two feet deep. Made of 15mm-thick glass, the depth will eliminate water column
multiples and the width will eliminate edge effects from the sides. The glass sides will
also aid in the alignment of the models and the sensors. A reusable river channel model
has been built to test the acoustic response of various fluids and porous solids. Liquids
such as water and oil and porous solids such as sand, steel shot and glass beads will be
used for various experiments.
FIG. 1 Single-channel omni-directional geophones. The top left geophone is in the vertical
position and the top right geophone is in the horizontal position. Note the levelling bubble on the
left side of the top of the case. In the foreground is the CREWES designed adapter plate and hex-
sided geophone spike. The white plastic bolts on the geophones are to keep the unused threads
clean of mud or snow.
FIG.2. Two consecutive raw shot gathers using vertical oriented geophones and a vertical impact
with a hammer. The recording parameters are: .05ms sample rate with traces every 2 metres,
with a 200ms AGC.
FIG.3. Two consecutive raw shot gathers using transverse oriented, horizontal geophones, with
impact towards the west. The recording parameters: .5ms sample rate with traces every 2
metres.
FIG.4. Two consecutive raw shot gathers using transverse oriented, horizontal geophones, with
impact towards the east. Recording parameters: .5ms sample rate with traces at every 2 metres.
FIG. 5. Hammer seismic plates and blocks. On the left is a flat plate with geophone-like spikes
and to its right is a cylinder. Both of these are vertical point sources. On the far right is the
tapered block which can generate both P-wave and S-wave energy.
FIG. 6. Flat top pyramid for generating both P-wave and S-wave beside a three pound sledge
hammer.
multiples. The new tank holds 900 litres of water with a weight of about 900 kilograms.
Because it is built of glass, it is easy to see into the tank for alignment of the models and
sensors.
FIG. 7. A very complex fold-thrust model from the C-CORE Laboratory, Memorial University, in
Saint John’s, Newfoundland. The model, which is 650mm long x 100mm wide and 120mm high at
the highest point, is made from silicone putty and plastercine.
FIG. 8. Fixed offset physical modelling acoustic data from the fold-thrust model in Figure 7.
Source/receiver offset 15mm, shot interval 1mm, 720 traces with 1000ms AGC.
PHYSICAL MODELLING
A reusable river channel model (Figure 9) has been built. The 600mm x 600mm x
100mm thick model is constructed of cast acrylic ( Vp = 2750ms and Vs = 1375ms ).
Made of two 50mm layers of acrylic, the model has a hollow meandering channel 45mm
wide x 10mm deep cut from edge to edge into one of the 50mm thick layers. This channel
has a secondary deeper channel 15mm deep and 10mm wide, which meanders across the
45mm width of the main channel. A series of experiments is planned that will use
different channel fills that can be repeated over time. Using various fluids such as water
and oil, and porous solids such as sand, steel shot or glass beads, we will be able to
measure the effects of changing velocity, density and porosity.
FIG.9. The reusable river channel model. Made of cast acrylic the dimensions are 600mm x
600mm x 100mm thick. The width of the channel is 45mm.
CONCLUSIONS
Good quality P-wave and S-wave data have been recorded on Devon Island and
elsewhere using the new omni-directional geophones in vertical and horizontal
orientations. We have constructed hammer seismic plates and blocks that have proven
successful in the field.
A new river channel model has been built that will give us measurements of changing
seismic response with variations in channel fill. The model will be used for 3D
multicomponent surveys and time lapse imaging.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge Andy Read and the staff of the Faculty of
Science Workshop, at The University of Calgary for the manufacture and help in the
design of the omni-directional geophone, the hammer seismic sources and the reusable
river channel model, which was machined using a CNC milling machine.
The authors would like also acknowledge the Foothills Research Project and the
Center for Cold Ocean Research and Engineering (C-CORE), Memorial University, St
John’s, Newfoundland, for the use of their fold-thrust model.
REFERENCES
Gallant E.V., Lawton D.C, and, Bertram, M.B., 1991: Development of a physical modelling system for 3-C
x 3-D experiments: CREWES Research Report, Vol. 3
Gallant E.V., Lawton D.C., Brown R.J., and Stewart R.R, 1994: Physical Modelling System Update:
CREWES Research Report, Vol. 6
Gallant E.V., Stewart R.R., Lawton D.C., and Bertram, M.B., 1996: New technologies in marine seismic
surveying: Overview and physical modelling experiments: CREWES Research Report, Vol. 7
Gallant E.V., Bertram M.B, and Stewart R.R., 1997: New multi-component acquisition equipment: An
initial report, CREWES Research Report, Vol. 9
Lawton D.C., Cheadle S.P., Gallant E.V., and Bertram M.B., 1989: Physical Seismic Modelling .of a
sand-filled channel, CREWES Research Report, Vol. 1