Sostenimiento 2
Sostenimiento 2
Daniele Peila
POLITECNICO DI TORINO
The excavation of the tunnel causes a redistribution of the natural stresses inside the
rock mass around the hole
2
The instability conditions that can occur in and around a tunnel depend on the type of
soil or rock in which the excavation is being done and on the natural (preexisting) state
of stress in the rock mass.
LOCAL
SAFETY
STABILITY
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
GLOBAL
DISPLACEM STABILITY
ENT
Examples of collapse
4
The boundary displacements and the stability of a tunnel is always
a tri-dimensional problem
and as such it should always be studied and analyzed.
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Hoek, 2002
5
The place inside of the tunnel, where it is necessary to act to obtain the stability of the
void, is always the last section of the tunnel that has just been excavated and where
neither the walls nor the face have still been supported.
Bieniawski, 1987
6
The just excavated section of the tunnel must remain stable for the time necessary to
carry out all the operations subsequent to blasting, which means mucking (removal
of blasted rock), scaling and support installation works.
This stretch of the tunnel is usually known as “unsupported span” and the
corresponding stability time is known as “characteristic time” or “self-bearing
time”.
stability of the unsupported span is requested in order to have enough time for
mucking, scaling and support excavation.
8
Ground geotechnical properties
The stability conditions are defined both by the strength of the rock in comparison
with the natural and induced stresses around the void and by the material
deformability, that can show an elastic, brittle, plastic, soft strengthening, etc.
behavior.
The in-situ stresses locked in the rock mass can depend from the geostatic and
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
gravity forces (nature of the material and depth of the excavation, i.e. overburden);
tectonic; geostructural-morphological conditions.
The opposition to the rock mass tension undertaken by the supports determines the
stability conditions for the tunnel.
This influences the rock mass tension concentration around the void (edges are
points where the tension concentration is maximum). The excavation section shape
can vary from rectangular (best use of the free section in road and railway tunnels) to
circular (more homogeneous induced tensions), up to polycentric (in order to get the
best advantages from both the approaches).
This influences the ask for resistance by the supports, both short-term and long-term
ones.
10
Construction method
Underground water
deep detail. The interference of the excavations with the underground water shows
many aspects: natural and induced tension field modification, soil alteration, nasty
interferences on the working operations and environmental impact.
11
13
14
Massive rock with
few unweathered
joints
no serious stability
problems.
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
16
Massive rock at great
depth
stress induced failures,
spalling and popping
with possible rockbursts.
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Apart from surface tunnels in loose soils whose behavior is determined by cohesion and
internal friction of the ground, the most frequent and complex case that presents a great
variety of aspects is that of tunnels in materials which undergo a plastic conditions due
to the stress re-distribution around the tunnel after the opening of the void.
The opening of the tunnel determines the movement of the rock mass towards the void
and the excavation and stabilization methods are to be designed in such a way as to put
the deformations under control.
18
Excavation methods can be divided in four main groups
- Conventional cyclic method using Drill and Blast. The excavation can be carried
out full face or parzialized face sub-dividing the face in smaller separate attacs, with or
without preventive reinforcement of the ground;
- Conventional cyclic method using punctual excavating machines (roadheader,
high energy impact hammer, mechanical excavator, etc.). The excavation can be carried
out full face or parzialized excavation sub-dividing the face in smaller separate attacs,
with or without preventive reinforcement of the ground;
- Full face mechanised continuous excavation method using Rock TBM for the
excavation of tunnels in rock. The main problem is to break the rock;
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
19
When the unsupported length is too short it can be changed through the following four
methods:
20
1) To reduce of the excavation section into smaller portions for parzialized face.
In smaller face the control of the stability is easier, the characteristic time is shorter,
smaller amount of waste rock is to be removed and fewer supports have to be installed.
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
21
1) To reduce of the excavation section into smaller portions for parzialized face.
22
1) To reduce of the excavation section into smaller portions for parzialized face.
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
23
Classification between the various possible multiple headings excavation and the
rock mass quality
Hoek, 2000
24
2) To apply a counter pressure at the face.
- mechanized tunnelling
Pressure transducers
inside the bulk chamber
Maidl et a2l5.,1994
26
3) and 4) Improving the ground properties and pre-supporting the tunnel free span.
The main problem, when tunneling through difficult geotechnical conditions with
conventional methods, is the control of deformations.
Without support or reinforcement the ground plasticizes and tends to move towards the
opening:
To prevent this phenomena of the ground around the tunnel, it is necessary to use “pre-
confinement technique” (defined as any action that favours the formation of an arch
effect in the ground ahead the tunnel face) or to improve the ground properties.
27
DESIGN APPROACH
Grasso, 2010
28
Tunnel construction and ground
reinforcement: various technologies
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Daniele Peila
POLITECNICO DI TORINO
IMPROVEMENTS
REINFORCEMENTS
PRE-SUPPORTS
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
IMPROVEMENT
Methods which improve (from the engineering point of view) the mechanical or
hydraulic properties of the rock mass: injecting fluids or freezing the fluids
already present in the ground
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
REINFORCEMENT
Methods which use the insertion, inside the rock mass, of structural elements
with one dimention prevalent
- Bolts
- Micropiles
- Cable bolting
- mechanical precut
- pretunnel
- steel pipe umbrella
- arch of microtunnels
PRE-SUPPORT
If the improvement techniques are used to create a reinforced zone around the
tunnel and ahead the tunnel face
The global action must be considered as the most important for tunnelling.
Therefore this intervention can be classified as a pre-support.
MECHANICAL PRECUT
ARCH OF MICROTUNNELS
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Seikan Tunnel grouting scheme to cross fault zones (Hashimoto and Tanabe, 1986)
DRAINAGE
Technologies which take away water from the rock mass or the ground in a
controlled way.
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Key: ● Applicable. ◉ Applicable with special intervention: 1 – chemical grout; 2 - two or three-fluid
jet grouting; 3 - steel rebar or pipe reinforced jet grouting; 4 – active dewatering (vacuum pump
required); 5 – additional grouting; 6 – high resistance element; 7 – additional grouting.
The interventions listed in this table can be combined in order to guarantee safe tunnelling conditions in
almost all geotechnical conditions. Grouting, jet-grouting, freezing and dewatering can be normally be
applicable also when tunnelling under water table. The other interventions when the tunnel is under the
water table must be combined with impermeabilization techniques.
Action
Radial displacement
u0
Face stabilization
free span
Lining
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Daniele Peila
POLITECNICO DI TORINO
STEEL PIPE UMBRELLA OR FOREPOLING
temporary invert
Steel arch
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
DO NOT MODIFY
Cross-section of Lonato tunnel (Italy) where steel pipe umbrella has been used
in a morain. The excavation has been carried out heading and bench.
Key: A: steel pipes; B: twin steel arches; C: shotcrete; D: electro-weldes
mesh; E: micropile; F: jet grouting column; G: drainage pipe, H: concrete
lining
Some Italian examples
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Example of steel pipe umbrella in a strong clay (argillite) with rock blocks
Drainage tunnel below San Lorenzo Tunnel (Italy)
Rock block
Example of steel pipe umbrella and jet grouting face reinforcement in sand
Cossato Tunnel (north entrance), Italy
FOREPOLING
(Germany)
FOREPOLING
(Germany)
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
The concrete which fills and surrounds the pipe is not normally considered
in the calculation.
The computation is carried out for the most critical phase, which is just
before the installation of the steel rib as the free span is the longest.
Steel pipe
Tunnel face
q
a)
L=(d+s+g)
q
b)
L=(d+s+g)
The acting load on the pipe [q] can be evaluated, starting from the value of the maximum
vertical stress
q = pvi
where "i" is the spacing between the pipes.
One of the problems is the evaluation of the vertical stress that is acting near the face. In
many cases, it is empirically assumed that p v = 0.50-0.75 of the total vertical load before
excavation and the the load is evaluated by the well known formulation of Terzaghi.
The length ahead of the tunnel face which is not acting as support of the pipes
(g) is usually empirically chosen and very often the value of 0.5 m is assumed.
This value is, obviously, directly linked to the geomechanical properties of the
ground and to the presence of tunnel face reinforcements.
More detailed research must be developed for a complete and final definition of
this length.
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Considering that the support action of the of the pipes must be developed for a
short period of time before the tunnel support are installed (steel arches and
shotcrete), the admissible working stress of the steel of the pipes can be close
to its field stress (1.5>Fs>1.1).
Knowing the acting stresses it is possible to chose the type of pipe.
The length of the steel pipe is linked to practical reasons, that is, drillability and the
maximum bore hole deviation which limit the length of 15-18 m;
The length of the overlap between two subsequent umbrella is controlled by the
behaviour of the ground ahead the tunnel face.
In recent years there have been numerous studies on tunnel face reinforcement with
longitudinal pipes based on small scale laboratory tests, field tests and numerical
modelling. The results of these researches suggest that the length of the overlap must
not be less that 0.3-0.4 times the equivalent diameter of the tunnel.
The interax between the pipes is chosen taking into account the fact that the ground
must not flow between the pipes. Therefore, the natural cohesion of the ground should
be able to control and prevent the occurrence of this phenomenon. Simple calculations
can be carried out, considering the stability of the slice of ground onto two nearby
pipes.
Design flow chart
Change the
1) Choice of a tentative interax
2) Choice of a tentative diametre and thickness of the pipes geometrical
3) Choice of a tentative interax between the steel arches parameters
9) Definition of the steel pipe length (on the basis of available machines)
10) Definition of the excavation length
11) Design of the supports and of steel arch foundations
The described empirical approaches are very simple and their application has been
consolidated in time but they neglect some parameters which are very important for the
design:
does not consider the real stiffness of the supports (steel arches and ground);
- the effect of the ground ahead of the face;
- the own bending stiffness of the steel pipe.
To take into account these aspects it is possible to use more complex design schemes:
- a model based on the approach of a beam on multiple supports.
The design of
foundation procedures
are usually used
BULLFLEX SYSTEM
Problem of contact between the steel arch and the pipes: Bullflex pillow
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
2D numerical modelling
some authors proposed to use a ground reinforced arch around the tunnel
to model the action of the pipes
Problems
Hoek, 2001
Daniele Peila
POLITECNICO DI TORINO
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
simple in-situ tests such as cone penetration or SPT, to estimate soil consistency or relative
density
simple laboratory tests on representative soil samples, to evaluate grain size distribution of
cohesionless materials and water content, bulk density, properties of cohesive formations
laboratory tests on trial grout and soil- grout mixtures, to be defined according to the importance
and specific requirements of the work
in-situ jet grouting tests to check the operational parameters and to a larger extent, if necessary, to
provide more detailed information for the final design.
Design of operational parameters
Geometry of treatment
The great flexibility of the jet grouting procedures allows various problems to be solved by
suitable geometrical patterns such as:
continuous strip treatment by one or more rows of vertical overlapping elements to form cut-off
walls for ground water control or earth-retaininq strucures. Such barriers may have a circular or
elliptic form, for instance when required to protect deep shaft excavation
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
sub-horizontal treatment ahead of the excavation face in deep tunnelling, when operations from
the surface are impossible or not convenient.
The grout mix constituents and composition can be varied to meet the specific requirements for
strength and permeability with quite different and less restrictive criteria in comparison with
conventional injection. As regards the initial rheological properties, viscosity and rigidity should
be fairly low in any case to allow a uniform treatment to the greatest extent.
Where strength is the main design criterion a simple cement slurry is employed, with a
cement/water ratio C/W mostly ranging between 0,5 and 1,0 to be selected according to various
factors besides the required strength, such as:
the type of soil as regards grain size and permeability in general and water content in cohesive
formations
In permeable granular formations a considerable amount of water may be drained out both from
the soil and the grout, while in a cohesive soil of low permeability the final water content may
nearly equal the sum of the two original contents.
Design of operational parameters
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Influence of water contents of grout and soil on the required quantities of grout and
cement (Perelli Cippo e Tornaghi, 1984).
The influence of nozzle diameter, pressure, type and quantity of grout, monitor rotation
and withdrawal speed have been widely investigated in various soils and hydrological
conditions.
A suitable selection of these parameters requires practical experience and may demand
site trials.
Design of operational parameters
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
The results of any treatment, in terms of uniformity and mechanical properties, depends on a
number of interconnected factors concerning the soil and the jet-grouting parameters.
Daniele Peila
POLITECNICO DI TORINO
Tunnel face ground reinforcement is obtained by installing on the
tunnel face fibre glass elements (such as pipes or plaquettes) fully
grouted and therefore connected with the soil/rock mass
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
packer
Ground reinforcement used for the construction of the the Bo-Fi highspeed
railway (Italy)
Example of some scheme of ground reinforcement using longitudinal fiber
glass reinforcement in Tartaiguille tunnel (France) (Lunardi, 2000)
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Example of reinforcement scheme that was adopted to cross the Daj Khad
shear zone in the Headrace tunnel of Nathpa Jhakri Hydroelectric Project
- India (courtesy Geodata S.p.A.)
Example of Reinforcement scheme that was adopted to cross the Daj Khad shear zone in
the Headrace tunnel of Nathpa Jhakri Hydroelectric Project - India (courtesy Geodata
S.p.A.)
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Failure bulbs for different ratio diameter/depth (Chambon and Corté, 1990)
Tunnel near the surface - collapse mechanism: sliding of the ground
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
P
Pc Pf P0 P
Deep tunnel - collapse mechanism: estrusion
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Lunardi, 2000
face support
DESIGN PROCEDURES
4N A 4N b sl a
t min b 2 b ;
D 2
Peila, 1994
D
where:
Nb = number of VTR pipe; A = cross section of the VTR pipe; Sl lateral surface
of the pipes, a = shear stress on the lateral surface of the pipe; b= yielding stress
of the pipe material
Evaluation of face reinforcement action
c * c
2 cos
n T max
3 c
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
c 1
S 3
c
Tmax= max force of sliding between the reinforcement and the ground
u (mm)
analisi a)
analisi b)
analisi c)
dati sperimentali
Experimental data
San Vitale tunnel (Italy)
Horn model (1961) which was assumed by Anagnostou and Kovari (1994,1996) as the
base for the stabilty analysis of the face ahead of Slurry Shield and EPB machines bat
can be used for surface tunnel design
Face reinforcement
Evaluation of the forces in the nails based on
Sliding body Soil nailing approach
(Raccomendation Cluterre, 1991)
Example of 3D numerical computation with modeling of the elements
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Sewer
Self-drilling bolts
(=38mm) to inject
silicate resins (2
components)
Steel arches
IPN 160
double
+ bullflex
1m
Drilling and installation of self drilling bolts
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
138
The Serra dell’Ospedale Tunnel
139
GEOLOGICAL MAP
PL1: Sandy silts
PL2: Silty sands and fine sands
PL3: Silty clays and clayey silts
Longitudinal geotechnical profile, Serra dell’ Ospedale Tunnel
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
Debris
SAL Silty sands Typical geotechnical soil layout
SA-SAG-SAF
Fine sands
Sands Complex
SAF SAL (yellow)
142
- the sands show a rather different behaviour, even in presence of similar
granulometrical mixtures
- the sands, if present at the face inside the layers or lenses in the clayey-silt,
constitute a somewhat precarious support foundation for the clayey
formations, which often result instable because of lack of support
- the silty-clayey soil has a role that is connected to the deformability of the
excavation face
144
Documents pédagogiques internes au Mastère TOS
a transversal section and longitudinal profile of the “umbrella” at the back face and the consolidation of the excavation face
147
Type A: water and cement in a ratio of 0.6 was not used as it proved to be too
“scattered”
The drilling pipes were first bent by the excavator and then cut off with a
robust scissor supported by a trucked carrier and then carried away
151
Execution
Quantity
Operation Dimensions time (*)
per cycle
hours
diameter
length m
mm
Pre-lining of the back face
110,6/8 12 78 48 (**)
(one self-drilling casting)
Reinforcement of the face
(self-drilling microcasting) 60,3/8 18 80 72 (**)
TOTALTIMEPERCYCLE 198
152