Fire
Fire
793
Acta Ophthalmologica 2014
of muscle cells both in the levator considered a quality improvement Results were categorized as ‘good’,
palpebrae and M€ uller0 s muscle (Grove study by the Regional Medical Ethics ‘acceptable’ and ‘unacceptable’ accord-
1981; Cockerham et al. 2002; Shih Committee of Western Norway, and ing to Mourits and Sasim (Mourits &
et al. 2006). It is thought that inflam- was approved as such by the Hauke- Sasim 1999). A ‘good’ result is defined
mation may cause changes in eyelid land University Hospital review board as the upper eyelid covering 0.5–
structures that progress towards fibro- (project no. 2010/474). The study 1.5 mm of the cornea in the 12 o’clock
sis resulting in a tight, retracted eyelid. adhered to the tenets of the Declara- position, the difference in lid aperture
There are several options for tion of Helsinki. between the two sides is <1 mm, the
treatment of upper eyelid retrac- The patients underwent a clinical eyelid contour is smooth, the lid crease
tion. Injections with botulinum toxin, examination that included photogra- is within 7–10 mm of the lid margin,
triamcinolone (Lee et al. 2013) and phy, and their hospital records were the skin folds of the right and left lid
hyaluronic acid (Mancini et al. 2011) reviewed. Before surgery, all patients are symmetrical, and the patient is
may produce temporary relief. A had been euthyroid for at least satisfied. An ‘acceptable’ result is pres-
number of techniques have been 12 months, and none had any signs of ent when the upper eyelid margin is
described for surgical treatment. Most active inflammation according to the within 0.5 mm of the limbus or covers
are variations on weakening or length- Clinical Activity Score (CAS) (Mourits no more than 2 mm of the cornea in
ening of the upper eyelid retractors et al. 1997). They were all operated by the 12 o0 clock position, the difference
(Schaefer 2007). The effect has in some the same surgeon (ER). between the right and the left side is
cases only been evaluated by a single The position of the eyelid was mea- <2 mm, and otherwise as in ‘good’
group of investigators, and frequently sured relative to the limbus with the result.
only in small series. Comparing data normal position being 1–1.5 mm below Parameters were recorded in an
from individual studies can be difficult the limbus. Retraction was considered Excel spreadsheet and analysed using
as patient features and criteria for to be present when the eyelid was the statistical package for the social
success may vary from one study to <0.5 mm below the limbus. sciences (SPSS Version 21.0; IBM Cor-
another. The surgical procedure has been poration, Armonk, NY, USA). Paired
Surgically, the main challenges are described previously (Collin & O’Don- t-test was performed to evaluate the
to avoid contour defects, under-correc- nell 1994). It was carried out under change in pre- and postoperative mea-
tion and secondary ptosis. Levator local anaesthesia using a 50/50 solution surements. p-values <0.05 were consid-
recession with adjustable sutures of marcaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1% ered significant.
addresses many of the problems that with adrenaline 0.005%. In cases with
may result in poor outcome following bilateral involvement, both upper lids
surgery for upper eyelid retraction. were operated in the same session.
Results
This includes cutting the lateral horn Briefly, following a lid crease incision A total of 80 patients, 74 women and
of the levator aponeurosis to eliminate down to the tarsal plate, the levator 6 men underwent levator recession
lateral flare, recessing both the levator aponeurosis was separated from with adjustable sutures as the primary
and M€ uller muscle and releasing the M€ uller0 s muscle. The septum was procedure for correcting upper eyelid
septum to ensure sufficient lowering of opened across the eyelid, and the retraction between 2001 and 2011. At
the lid. The sutures allow adjustments lateral horn of the levator aponeurosis follow-up, 4 were dead and 12 were
of the eyelid contour and symmetry was cut. Except in the most severe unable to attend. Among the 64
relative to the opposite eyelid. The cases, the medial horn was left intact patients that attended, 6 had suffered
adjustments can be done without the (Ceisler et al. 1995). M€ uller0 s muscle from recurrent, active inflammation
influence of local anaesthesia. The was then dissected from the underlying with worsening of their thyroid eye
positioning of the sutures restores the conjunctiva, and a vertical incision was disease after they had undergone leva-
eyelid crease. So far, however, the made in the lateral part of the muscle tor recession and were therefore
results of treatment with adjustable to detach it from its lateral extension. excluded from further analysis. The
sutures have only been reported in Three double-armed polyglactin 910 12 patients unable to attend were
small series (Levine & Chu 1991; Small (Vicryl) 6-0 sutures were passed from contacted by telephone. They were
1995; Tucker & Collin 1995; Woog the levator aponeurosis to the upper all satisfied with the outcome and
et al. 1996), and there are no long-term part of the tarsus. The sutures were none requested any further surgery.
studies. In this study, we have re- then passed through the skin edges, one All of them had only been operated
examined 58 patients (86 eyelids) trea- arm above and the other below the once.
ted with this procedure. incision and tied temporarily. Polyester Among the 58 patients that partici-
(Ethicon, Kirkton, Scotland) 6-0 pated in the follow-up examination,
sutures were used for additional skin median age at surgery was 49 years
Materials and Methods closure. Eyelid position was adjusted (range 32–72 years), and median time
All patients that had primary surgery the day after surgery. No anaesthesia from surgery to the follow-up exam
due to upper eyelid retraction with was used during the adjustment. The was 56 months (range 6–123 months).
levator recession using adjustable patients were then seen after 1 week. In Correction was performed bilaterally in
sutures in the period 2001–2011 were under-corrected patients, both the po- 28 patients, and unilaterally in 30
invited to participate in the study. A lyglactin and the polyester sutures were patients. During the active stage of
written informed consent was obtained removed, otherwise only the polyester the disease, 23 patients had been
from the participants. The study was sutures were removed. treated with corticosteroids. Of these,
794
Acta Ophthalmologica 2014
795
Acta Ophthalmologica 2014
Perioperatively, all patients were Using the same procedure in 41 All degrees of eyelid retraction can be
overcorrected as it is easier to raise patients and evaluating the outcome corrected, but the procedure is time-
the eyelid than to lower it postopera- with the criteria of Mourits and Sasim, consuming, and patients must be
tively. In patients with tight sutures, Hintschich and Haritoglou reported a informed about the risk for reopera-
both the skin sutures and the adjust- perfect result in 72% (43/60 lids) and tion. Compared with other procedures,
able sutures were removed 1 week acceptable in 23% (14/60 lids) after 1 it appears that equally good or better
postoperatively. However, the position or 2 procedures (Hintschich & Hari- results can be achieved with less
of the eyelid is fairly stable at this time- toglou 2005). In a recent study, Shortt demanding techniques. Still, there is a
point (Mourits & Sasim 1999; Shortt and co-workers used a graded need for randomized studies to deter-
et al. 2011), and unless there is an approach with levator recession, lateral mine the optimal procedure for cor-
immediate lowering of the lid following and in some cases medial M€ ullerecto- recting upper eyelid retraction.
suture removal, a reoperation should my, and, if necessary, division of the
be considered as it is quite easy to pull conjunctiva (Shortt et al. 2011). Suc-
the tissues apart and insert a new set of cessful outcome using similar criteria as
Acknowledgements
sutures. Mourits and Sasim was reported in The assistance of photographer B
ard
The procedure, as described by Col- 87% of the eyelids (45/52 eyelids). Kjersem is greatly appreciated.
lin and O‘Donnell, included cutting the The reoperation rates in the more
medial horn of the levator aponeurosis recent studies include 18% (7/38 lids)
(Collin & O’Donnell 1994). We find (McNab et al. 2004), 13.5% (7/52 lids) References
that in lids with mild or moderate (Shortt et al. 2011), 12% (7/60 lids)
retraction this may not be necessary to (Hintschich & Haritoglou 2005), 8% Bartley GB (1996): The differential diagnosis
and classification of eyelid retraction. Oph-
achieve overcorrection perioperatively. (1/12 lids) (Woog et al. 1996), 6.5% (7/
thalmology 103: 168–176.
While good results could be achieved 107 lids) (Ben Simon et al. 2005), 3% Bartley GB, Fatourechi V, Kadrmas EF,
for all degrees of retraction, patients (2/72 lids) (Ceisler et al. 1995), and 2% Jacobsen SJ, Ilstrup DM, Garrity JA &
with severe retraction were on aver- (1/50 lids) (Elner et al. 2004). The main Gorman CA (1996): Clinical features of
age slightly overcorrected. A similar reason for reoperation is either under- Graves’ ophthalmopathy in an incidence
experience was reported by Elner or over-correction with subsequent cohort. Am J Ophthalmol 121: 284–290.
and co-workers in their series on full- asymmetry between the two upper Ben Simon GJ, Mansury AM, Schwarcz RM,
thickness anterior blepharotomy. Here, eyelids. Contour abnormalities, wound Modjtahedi S, McCann JD & Goldberg RA
(2005): Transconjunctival Muller muscle
the final heights in severe retraction dehiscence and skin crease recession
recession with levator disinsertion for cor-
were more variable, and patients with less frequently lead to reoperation. rection of eyelid retraction associated with
mild lid retraction had the least chance When comparing the results from thyroid-related orbitopathy. Am J Ophthal-
of having postoperative asymmetry different studies, it is important to bear mol 140: 94–99.
(Elner et al. 2004). in mind that the studies vary with Ceisler EJ, Bilyk JR, Rubin PA, Burks WR &
The outcome after unilateral surgery respect to the number of patients stud- Shore JW (1995): Results of Mullerotomy
was less successful than after bilateral ied, the severity of lid retraction and and levator aponeurosis transposition for
surgery with a larger proportion of the criteria used for evaluating the the correction of upper eyelid retraction in
Graves disease. Ophthalmology 102: 483–
patients achieving only an acceptable outcome. Also, in some series, there is
492.
result. Others have not observed any a mix of patients with thyroid eye Cockerham KP, Hidayat AA, Brown HG,
difference in the outcome after unilat- disease and other conditions, and some Cockerham GC & Graner SR (2002): Clin-
eral and bilateral surgery (Mourits & include a re-examination of patients, icopathologic evaluation of the Mueller
Sasim 1999). However, some patients while others are based solely on hospi- muscle in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.
with unilateral retraction may actually tal records. It is important to re-exam- Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 18: 11–17.
have bilateral disease, and this in addi- ine the patients since unacceptable Collin JR & O’Donnell BA (1994): Adjustable
tion to the effect of Hering‘s law may results may not be noticed if the sutures in eyelid surgery for ptosis and lid
retraction. Br J Ophthalmol 78: 167–174.
influence the outcome. patients are only interviewed by phone
Elner VM, Hassan AS & Frueh BR (2004):
Other techniques for correcting or by answering a questionnaire. There Graded full-thickness anterior blepharoto-
upper eyelid retraction in thyroid eye are very few studies where different my for upper eyelid retraction. Arch Oph-
disease have been introduced more procedures are compared. In a retro- thalmol 122: 55–60.
recently. Levator aponeurosis transpo- spective study, Tucker and Collin Gaddipati RV & Meyer DR (2008): Eyelid
sition has been used in 2 studies. found that levator recession with retraction, lid lag, lagophthalmos, and von
Ceisler and coworkers reported excel- adjustable sutures gave better results Graefe’s sign quantifying the eyelid features
lent results in 81% (30/37 patients, 58/ than levator recession without sutures of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Ophthalmol-
ogy 115: 1083–1088.
72 eyelids) and good results in 6/37 or with non-adjustable sutures (Tucker
Grove AS Jr (1981): Upper eyelid retraction
patients (13/72 eyelids) (Ceisler et al. & Collin 1995). and Graves’ disease. Ophthalmology 88:
1995), while Schaefer obtained excel- 499–506.
lent results in 91% (32 patients, 48
eyelids) (Schaefer 2007). Elner and
Conclusion Harvey JT & Anderson RL (1981): The
aponeurotic approach to eyelid retraction.
co-workers obtained good results with Good results can be obtained after Ophthalmology 88: 513–524.
anterior blepharotomy in 75% (32 levator recession with adjustable Hintschich C & Haritoglou C (2005): Full
patients 50 eyelids) (Elner et al. 2004). sutures for the treatment of upper thickness eyelid transsection (blepharotomy)
for upper eyelid lengthening in lid retraction
Only 1 patient had asymmetry >1 mm. eyelid retraction in thyroid eye disease.
796
Acta Ophthalmologica 2014
associated with Graves’ disease. Br J Oph- Mourits MP & Sasim IV (1999): A single Small RG (1995): Surgery for upper eyelid
thalmol 89: 413–416. technique to correct various degrees of retraction, three techniques. Trans Am Oph-
Lee SJ, Rim TH, Jang SY, Kim CY, Shin DY, upper lid retraction in patients with Graves’ thalmol Soc 93: 353–365; discussion 365–
Lee EJ, Lee SY & Yoon JS (2013): Treat- orbitopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 83: 81–84. 359.
ment of upper eyelid retraction related to Mourits MP, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM & Tucker SM & Collin R (1995): Repair of upper
thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy using Koornneef L (1997): Clinical activity score eyelid retraction: a comparison between
subconjunctival triamcinolone injections. as a guide in the management of patients adjustable and non-adjustable sutures. Br J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251: with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Endo- Ophthalmol 79: 658–660.
261–270. crinol 47: 9–14. Woog JJ, Hartstein ME & Hoenig J (1996):
Lelli GJ Jr, Duong JK & Kazim M (2010): Putterman AM (1981): Surgical treatment of Adjustable suture technique for levator
Levator excursion as a predictor of both thyroid-related upper eyelid retraction. recession. Arch Ophthalmol 114: 620–624.
eyelid lag and lagophthalmos in thyroid eye Graded Muller’s muscle excision and levator
disease. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 26: recession. Ophthalmology 88: 507–512.
7–10. Schaefer DP (2007): The graded levator hinge
Received on September 30th, 2013.
Levine MR & Chu A (1991): Surgical treat- procedure for the correction of upper eyelid
Accepted on February 23rd, 2014.
ment of thyroid-related lid retraction: a new retraction (an American Ophthalmological
variation. Ophthalmic Surg 22: 90–94. Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc
Correspondence:
Mancini R, Khadavi NM & Goldberg RA 105: 481–512.
Dr. Eyvind Rødahl
(2011): Nonsurgical management of upper Shih MJ, Liao SL, Kuo KT, Smith TJ &
Department of Ophthalmology
eyelid margin asymmetry using hyaluronic Chuang LM (2006): Molecular pathology of
Haukeland University Hospital
acid gel filler. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Muller’s muscle in Graves’ ophthalmopathy.
N-5021 Bergen
Surg 27: 1–3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 1159–1167.
Norway
McNab AA, Galbraith JE, Friebel J & Caesar Shortt AJ, Bhogal M, Rose GE & Shah-Desai
Tel: +47 55 97 41 10
R (2004): Pre-Whitnall levator recession S (2011): Stability of eyelid height after
Fax: +47 55 97 41 43
with hang-back sutures in Graves orbitopa- graded anterior-approach lid lowering for
Email: eyvind.rodahl@helse-bergen.no
thy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 20: dysthyroid upper lid retraction. Orbit 30:
301–307. 280–288.
797