Sizing Calculations For 20/3.3 KV, 12.5 MVA Transformer Feeder Cable
Sizing Calculations For 20/3.3 KV, 12.5 MVA Transformer Feeder Cable
5 MVA transformer
feeder cable
electrical-engineering-portal.com /cable-sizing-transformer-feeder
Google+ 08/05/2017
Typical calculations for a 20kV transformer feeder cable are presented below. After correct cable voltage
classification the following considerations apply:
Consider a 20/3.3 kV, 12.5 MVA transformer to be fed by direct buried, 3 core XLPE, SWA, PVC, copper
conductor cable.
Cable sizing for 20/3.3 kV, 12.5 MVA transformer feeder (photo credit: cabletecservices.co.uk)
1. Cable current carrying capacity
Don’t forget derating factors… Manufacturers provide data sheets for cables including appropriate
derating factors based upon IEC 60287 (Table 1). For a ground temperature at depth of laying of 20°C, the
derating factor is 0.97.
The group derating factor based upon 3 cables laid in trench at 0.45 m centres is 0.84. Ground thermal
resistivity taken as the normal of 1.2°Cm/W for a UK installation and 1.00 rating factor. Cable installation
depth to be 0.8 m and 1.00 rating factor.
Go back to contents ↑
The maximum system fault level in this application is 8.41 kA. From standard IEC 60364-5-54 (Electrical
Installations In Buildings – Earthing arrangements, protective conductors and protective bonding
conductors):
Isc = K × A / √t
Where:
From manufacturers tables and/or Figures 1 (a–c) for working voltages up to and including 19000 / 33000
XLPE based insulated cable the selected 240 mm2 cable is just capable of this 1 second short circuit
rating.
Note tables are conservative and assume a fully loaded cable. At the initiation of the fault conductor
temperature is 90°C and at the end of the fault conductor temperature is 250°C.
Go back to contents ↑
Figure 1 – (a) Paper-, (b) PVC- and (c) XLPE-insulated copper conductor cable short circuit ratings
Consider a 100 m route length of cable with resistance, R = 0.0982 Ω/km and inductive reactance, XL =
0.097 Ω/km. At full load current, Ifl = 361 A at 0.85 power factor the cable voltage drop over a 100 m cable
length,
Important Notes //
Go back to contents ↑
For building services work it is important with small cross-section wiring and low fault levels to ensure that
sufficient earth fault current flows to trip the MCB or fuse protection. For distribution power networks
with more sophisticated protection the check is still necessary and allows the calculation of the likely touch
voltages arising from the earth fault.
This in turn can then be checked against the allowable fault duration to avoid danger. See this article for a
consideration of the design criteria associated with touch and step potentials.
Criteria #2 – The source substation 20 kV neutral is approximately 10 km from the 100 m cable under
consideration. In addition parallel copper conductor earth cable is run to supplement and improve power
cable armour resistance values from equipment back to the primary substation infeed neutral.
For this example assume power and supplementary earth copper cables and armour over the 10 km
distance have a combined effective resistance of 0.143.
Criteria #3 – The combined resistance of the 100 m, 240 mm2, cable armour (0.028 Ω / 100 m) and in
parallel 2 × 95 mm2 copper supplementary earth cables (0.00965 Ω /100 m) = 7.18 × 10-3 Ω.
Criteria #5 – The effective earth circuit is shown in Figure 2. The effective primary substation neutral-to-
fault cable resistance 0.15.
Figure 2 – Calculation example – earth loop impedance
Criteria #6 – The maximum earth fault current at 20 kV has to be determined. Sometimes this is limited by
a neutral earthing resistor and the maximum limited current may be taken for calculation. Maximum earth
fault current for this calculation is 1000 A.
For a fault to earth at the end of the 100 m cable, 10 km from the primary power infeed the fault current,
Therefore touch voltage to earth at the cable fault 131 × 0.5 = 65.3 V
Go back to contents ↑
Reference // Transmission and Distribution Electrical Engineering by Dr C. R. Bayliss CEng FIET and B. J.
Hardy ACGI CEng FIET