Scribd
Upload
77 views2 pages

Belo Vs Comelec

This case discusses whether Mikey Arroyo, a nominee of the Ang Galing Pinoy Party-List, qualified to hold the party-list seat given questions around whether he truly represented the marginalized sector. The Supreme Court ruled that while the COMELEC sets guidelines for nominees, the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal has jurisdiction over the qualifications of elected members, including party-list nominees, once they assume office. It held that Arroyo met the legal requirements to be a nominee but that the issue of his qualifications fell under the HRET's jurisdiction once he was proclaimed and assumed his seat in Congress.

Uploaded by

JM Genobaña
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
77 views2 pages

Belo Vs Comelec

This case discusses whether Mikey Arroyo, a nominee of the Ang Galing Pinoy Party-List, qualified to hold the party-list seat given questions around whether he truly represented the marginalized sector. The Supreme Court ruled that while the COMELEC sets guidelines for nominees, the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal has jurisdiction over the qualifications of elected members, including party-list nominees, once they assume office. It held that Arroyo met the legal requirements to be a nominee but that the issue of his qualifications fell under the HRET's jurisdiction once he was proclaimed and assumed his seat in Congress.

Uploaded by

JM Genobaña
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

CHAPTER: Legislative Department

BELLO VS COMELEC

TOPIC: Constitutional organs within congress, power

FACTS:
 Ang Galing Pinoy Party-List (AGPP) on November 29, 2009, AGPP filed with the
Commission on Elections (COMELEC) its Manifestation of Intent to participate in the
May 10, 2010 elections.
 On March 25, 2010, the COMELEC issued Resolution No. 8807 33 which prescribed the
rules of procedure applicable to petitions to disqualify a party-list nominee for purposes
of the May 10, 2010 elections.
 In order not to be disqualified, they must prove that the party-list group and the
nominees truly belong to the marginalized and underrepresented sector/s, and to the
sectoral party, organization, political party or coalition they seek to represent.
 Mikey Arroyo was one of the party’s nominees. Here arose several questions regarding
his qualification for, he is not only a member of the First Family, but is also (a) an
incumbent member of the House of Representatives.
o Arroyo cannot be considered a member of the marginalized and
underrepresented sector, particularly, the sector which the AGPP represents —
tricycle drivers and security guards —
 Arroyo counter-argued that the Comelec had no jurisdiction over issues involving the
qualifications of party-list nominees

ISSUES:
 Whether or not Arroyo duly represents the marginalized sector he is representing
 Whether the HRET has jurisdiction over the question of Arroyo’s qualifications as
AGPP’s nominee after his proclamation and assumption to office as a member of
the House of Representatives.

RULING: No,
 It held, among others, that a Filipino citizen, in order to qualify as a party-list
nominee, only needs to be a bona fide member of the party or organization which he
seeks to represent, for at least ninety (90) days preceding the day of the election, and
must likewise be at least twenty-five (25) years of age on the day of the election.
 he Comelec en banc also held that Section 6 of Resolution No. 8807 is ultra vires, since
the requirement that a nominee belong to the marginalized and underrepresented sector
he seeks to represent is not found in RA 7941.Thus, it concluded that Arroyo possessed
all the requirements mandated by Section 9 of RA 7941
 This issue is far from novel and is an issue previously ruled upon by this Court. The
consistent judicial holding is that the HRET has jurisdiction to pass upon the
qualifications of party-list nominees after their proclamation and assumption of
office; they are, for all intents and purposes, "elected members" of the House of
Representatives although the entity directly voted upon was their party.
 What is inevitable is that Section 17, Article VI of the Constitution provides that
o the HRET shall be the sole judge of all contests relating to, among other things,
the qualifications of the members of the House of Representatives. Since, as
pointed out above, party-list nominees are "elected members" of the House of
Representatives no less than the district representatives are, the HRET has
jurisdiction to hear and pass upon their qualifications.
 By analogy with the cases of district representatives, once the party or organization of
the party-list nominee has been proclaimed and the nominee has taken his oath and
assumed office as member of the House of Representatives, the Comelec’s
jurisdiction over election contests relating to his qualifications ends and the
HRET’s own jurisdiction begins.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy