Synopsis: " Scope of Parliamentary Privileges in India-A Study in Constitutional Perspective"
Synopsis: " Scope of Parliamentary Privileges in India-A Study in Constitutional Perspective"
MENTOR
MR. P. PATHAK
STUDENT NAME
SONAL
LL.M – II
Parliamentary Privileges: An Introduction
The privileges are provided to both the houses of parliament to work effectively
and efficiently and to discharge its functions without any kind of obstruction or
interference. The privileges are provided to each house collectively and to its
members independently.
India in the case of Raja Ram Pal v Hon’ble speaker defined the term privilege
as “A special right, advantage or benefit conferred on a particular person. It is a
peculiar advantage or favour granted to one person as against another to do
certain acts”. Inherent in the term is the idea of something, apart and distinct
from a common right which is enjoyed by all persons and connotes some sort of
special grant by the sovereign. The word grant by sovereign refers the privilege
is conferred to them by the higher authority and the privilege an immunity is
derived from them only to such members. As inspired by the privileges of house
of the commons. The privileges of House of Commons have been defined as
“the sum of the fundamental rights of the house and of its individual members
as against the prerogative of the crown, the authority of the ordinary court of
law and the special rights of the house of lord”. Sir Erskin May[ii] states-
“Parliamentary privilege is the sum of the peculiar rights enjoyed by each
House collectively as a constituent part of the High Court of Parliament, and by
Members of each House individually, without which they could not discharge
their functions, and which exceed those possessed by other bodies or
individuals. Thus privilege, though part of the law of the land, is to a certain
extent an exemption from the general law. Certain rights and immunities such
as freedom from arrest or freedom of speech belong primarily to individual
Members of each House and exist because the House cannot perform its
functions without unimpeded use of the services of its Members. Other such
rights and immunities such as the power to punish for contempt and the power
to regulate its own constitution belong primarily to each House as a collective
body, for the protection of its Members and the vindication of its own authority
and dignity. Fundamentally, however, it is only as a means to the effective
discharge of the collective functions of the House that the individual privileges
are enjoyed by Members”. Sir Erskin, widening beautifully the scope of
Privileges with inducing the concept of Power and Immunities of the members
of parliament that exists in India too describes them as the necessity for
parliament to perform its function with impeded use of services of its members.
He considers it as the tool for collective discharge of its collective and
important function. Sankar J. in a particular case stated that the right of the
House to have absolute control of its internal proceedings may be considered as
its privilege. Sighted very rightly in the case of raja Ram Pal that “privilege
depends on the known laws and customs of Parliament”. Thus, the term
privilege is the special rights that are available in the different extent and in
various forms to the members of parliament throughout the world. These
privileges are important in order to enable the house to perform its functions
authorized to them by constitution and for proper conduct of business.
Objectives Of Research
The objectives keeping in mind which this research paper has been undertaken
are as follows:
The methodology adopted for this study is purely doctrinal and based on
primary and secondary data gathered from different sources including
Constitutional Provisions, Statutes, Constituent Assembly Debates,
Parliamentary Debates, Case Laws, Books, Law-Journals, Magazines,
Newspapers, Published-interviews and On-line Databases.
Abstract
This thesis analyses parliamentary privilege. The privilege is an ancient
parliamentary power. All of countries that have democratized or will soon have
democratized provide them by own constitution. The purpose of the
parliamentary privilege is to permit members of the legislature to speech freely
and express their opinion of political position, and not worry about retaliation
on the basis of political motives. The Parliament formulates itself its own rules
of procedure and maintains the discipline of parliament itself and so on, in order
to ensure that the parliament can independently, freely discharge of its duties
and perform its functions. Parliamentary privilege, however, is often
misunderstood by popular who believes that the privilege is the special
protection of all of the elites of society. That is ironic, because privilege was
originally produced as a whole of the protection of Parliament, and it protected
members of parliament from the elites at that time. It may be said that
parliamentary privilege is a special institutional arrangements based on the
principles of democracy. Compared with otherparliamentary powers, it is
special because it is the defensive power of Parliament rather than an offensive
power which the parliament must proactively exercise.
Literature review:-
The existing literature on this research work mainly revolves around the
published works of Indian authors pertaining to the subject matter, the decided
and pending cases, Constituent Assembly and the articles published in the Law
journals. The researcher has made sincere efforts to fill the gap and lacunae in
the existing literature and suggested guidelines for making draft legislation
codifying the law of Parliamentary/Legislative Privileges as mandated under
Articles 105(1) and 194(1) of the Constitution.
Some other important sources are:-
Reference:-