LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY - CAVITE CAMPUS

College of Engineering, Computer Science and Architecture

RUBRIC FOR PROPOSAL DEFENSE - PROJECT BASED

NAME : TITLE :
ADVISER:

ASSESSMENT
Performance
Very Poor Poor Acceptable Commendable Rating Weight GRADE
Indicators
1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points
Content and Substance 30 -
There was an attempt to describe the study and The proposed study was well-presented, and its
Rationale and The proposed study was not properly presented, The proposed study was comprehensively
substantiate its significance. However, there significance was substantiated. However, there
Presentation and its significance was not substantiated and
were significant gray areas of understanding still minor misperceptions on some aspects of in
presented, and its novelty and significance was 10 -
of the Problem explained. well-explained.
and appreciation of the rationale of the study. the process of substantiation.
Architectural objectives were unclearly stated.
Architectural objectives were unclearly Architectural objectives were acceptably set and
All objectives were high falutin and validation is
presented. Some of the objectives may be validation is seemingly practical. However, there Architectural objectives were clearly set and
Objectives punctiliously impossible or unworkable.
workable but majority are pretentious and is still a visible details that needs to be validation is practically possible or achievable.
5 -
Inclusions and
validation seems to be impossible. enhanced or clarified.
Exclusions
There was a manifestation to explain the scope The scope and delimitation of the study was The scope and delimitation of the study was
Delineations, The scope and delimitation of the study was not
and delimitation. However, the delineation, explained and is generally acceptable. However, properly established. It was philosophically
Inclusions and properly expressed. Thus, the delineation,
exclusion and inclusion within the study were there are some aspects of delineation, exclusion delineating the things that shall be included and
4 -
Exclusions exclusion or inclusion were not understandable.
still significantly confusing. or inclusions that needs to be clarified. excluded in the study.
Methodologies including tools and approaches Methodologies including tools and approaches Methodologies including tools and approaches The research paradigm was clearly expounded
Strategies and to achieve the objectives were doubtfully to achieve the objectives were presented but were presented and proven. There is a minor and it comprehensively gave illustrative
Approaches presented and seemingly unrelated to the there are little relations to the general research enhancements that need to done to ensure that synopsis of the whole processes of the research
6 -
general research strategy. strategy. the methodologies would achieve the objectives. proposal.
Related literature and projects were Related literature and projects were presented Related literature and projects were annotated Related literature and projects were well
Related unannotated and confusing. It did not but not properly annotated. The attempt to relate and corroborated. However, there still a need to annotated, well-presented and successfully
Literature corroborate the profundity of theoretical it is not visible and did not corroborate the further explication on how the literature would corroborated the profundity of theoretical
5 -
framework. profundity of theoretical framework. reinforce the theoretical framework. framework.
Site Selection and Evaluation 15 -
 There is visible subjectivity and partiality in the
The application of the criteria was done with The application of the criteria was done with
There is visible subjectivity and partiality in the application of the criteria. Furthermore, there is
Site Criteria visible objectivity and impartiality. There was a visible objectivity and impartiality. There was
application of the criteria. There was no or little a need for major improvement of narratives to
Implementation
narratives to confirm the peripheral character of further confirm the confirmation the peripheral
need for minor improvement of narratives to narrative confirmation of the chosen sites in 5 -
and Confirmation further confirm the peripheral character of its relation to the peripheral character of its vicinity
its vicinity in micro and macro scale. character of its vicinity in micro and macro
vicinity in micro and macro scale. in micro and macro scale.
scale.
The site analysis was very confusing. The on-
The site analysis was systematic and The site analysis was systematic and
The site analysis was very superficial. The site documentation was not done with
comprehensive but need to further enhance the comprehensive. There was an actual on-site
Site Inventory presented inventory was obviously extracted conscientious effort and the inventory of
actual on-site documentation, inventory, and documentation, inventory and comprehensive
10 -
from google map or google earth. different features of the chosen site was
different features of the chosen site. list of different features of the chosen site.
incomplete
Architectural Programming and Conceptualization 40 -
There were major corrections needed in zoning
Zoning Assignments, Zoning assignments, site circulation and Site were zoned in accordance with the site
The zoning assignments, functional assignments, functional organization, site
Site Organization, networking were generally acceptable. There condition, codes and sensitivity to environmental
Circulation and
organization, site circulation and networking circulation and networking. The presented basis
are minor corrections needed in few of the factors. Site circulation elements were laid out
7 -
were visibly guessed and no basis at all. is not in cohesion with the presented
Networking mentioned factor. systematically and smoothly.
proposition
The general and specific spaces was simply The general and specific spaces was derived The general and specific spaces was derived
The general and specific spaces were as simply presented narratively without using generally systematically with the use of generally systematically with the use of generally
Space Derivation
assumed without or with scanty basis. acceptable methods. There was no rational acceptable methods. However there is a need acceptable methods. The process was also
5 -
narratives to support the presented spaces. for further supporting rational narratives. supported with rational narratives.
The presented space sizing and quantification The presented space sizing and quantification
Space sizing and quantification has no basis at The presented space sizing and quantification is
Space Sizing and was poorly presented. There was majority of was logically presented but there are few items
Quantification
all. No mathematical narratives that support the
spaces has no supporting mathematical which was unsupported with mathematical
commendable and was supported by 8 -
process. mathematical narratives.
narratives. narratives.
Proximity Analysis and The spaces were not properly organized. There is a little manifestation of space The space organization manifested familiarity in The space organization manifested familiarity in
Functional Grouping, Circulation was chaotic. Spaces were misplaced organization process. Majority of spaces were the process of functional grouping and zoning. the process of functional grouping and zoning.
and Spatial which in return prejudice the functional, utility misplaced in relation to circulation, functional, Some spaces were misplaced in relation to Spaces were juxtaposed based on circulation,
7 -
Organization and privacy requisites. utility and privacy. circulation, functional, utility and privacy. functional, utility and privacy relationship.
The engineering concept is clear and feasible. The presented sustainability and allied
There is very little understanding on whether the
Sustainability and Allied There was manifestation of total ignorance to However, there are some minor things which engineering concept was very comprehensive
Engineering Concepts the presented system and its philosophy.
presented concept is suited in the context of the
suggest the need for further contextualization of and manifest total connection to the design
8 -
project.
the proposed system to the project. intentions.
There is no systematic conceptualization of The process to derive the form concept was The process to derive the form concept was
There was an attempt to source out a concept of
form. The building geometry manifested that it systematically done and there is a strong systematically done. There is a strong
form from a tangible or intangible subject.
Design was not derived to create a strong architectural architectural statement that is philosophically architectural statement that is philosophically
Conceptualization statement but just an incidental volume after the
However, the translation resulted to a poorly
anchored to a creative origin. However, there anchored to a creative origin. There is a
5 -
organized geometry which offer a weak
juxtaposed spaces on plan was enclosed with are minor things that needs to be improved in in matured geometric organization and
architectural statement.
roof and wall plane. the geometric organization. juxtaposition outcome.
Oral Presentation 15 -
 The students failed to clearly and confidently The student at least showed effort to orally Generally, the student was able to explain his or The students clearly and confidently explained
explain his or her propositions. The usage of explain the proposition. However, there were her propositions although there are few his or her propositions in professional language.
Oral Presentation oral communication tool manifested lack of very obvious manifestations of confusions and apprehensive moments. There are very few Furthermore, the student confidently gave 10 -
confidence and fluency. The student cannot inconsistencies. Most of the time, the student instances that the student failed to give rejoinder rejoinder and comprehensive explications to all
answer or give rejoinder to the panel’s question. cannot give rejoinder to the panel’s query. to panel’s inquiry. panel inquiries.
The visual and graphical enhancement was
The students did not visibly supply matured, well
The student’s visual and graphical enhancement generally reasonable and conscientious effort is The students visibly supplied mature, and well-
prepared graphical and visual enhancements
Graphics was poor and almost indecipherable. Although, very visible. There are only few negligible prepared graphical and visual enhancements
Enhancements
during his or her presentation as a way of giving
there is a manifestation of conscientious effort, inaccuracies. In a way, the supporting graphics during his or her presentation as a way of giving
5 -
profound explications to his propositions. The
the enhancement outcome is very rudimentary. helped in giving due explications to the profound explications to the propositions.
visual aids were poorly done.
propositions
TOTAL
PASSED PASSED PASSED FAILED (Simply sum up the ‘grade’ in each row.)
REMARKS
with no revisions with minor revisions with major revisions THE PASSING GRADE IS 75% AND UP.
0.00
(please encircle)

NAME OF JUROR

SIGNATURE DATE
 LYCEUM OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSITY - CAVITE CAMPUS
College of Engineering, Computer Science and Architecture
ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT

RUBRIC FOR PROPOSAL DEFENSE - RESEARCH BASED

NAME : TITLE :
ADVISER:

ASSESSMENT
Performance
Very Poor Poor Acceptable Commendable Rating Weight GRADE
Indicators
1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points
Content and Substance 30 -
There was an attempt to describe the study and The proposed study was well-presented, and its
Rationale and The proposed study was not properly presented, The proposed study was comprehensively
substantiate its significance. However, there significance was substantiated. However, there
Presentation and its significance was not substantiated and
were significant gray areas of understanding still minor misperceptions on some aspects of in
presented, and its novelty and significance was 10 -
of the Problem explained. well-explained.
and appreciation of the rationale of the study. the process of substantiation.
Architectural objectives were unclearly stated.
Architectural objectives were unclearly Architectural objectives were acceptably set and
All objectives were high falutin and validation is
presented. Some of the objectives may be validation is seemingly practical. However, there Architectural objectives were clearly set and
Objectives punctiliously impossible or unworkable.
workable but majority are pretentious and is still a visible details that needs to be validation is practically possible or achievable.
5 -
Inclusions and
validation seems to be impossible. enhanced or clarified.
Exclusions
There was a manifestation to explain the scope The scope and delimitation of the study was The scope and delimitation of the study was
Delineations, The scope and delimitation of the study was not
and delimitation. However, the delineation, explained and is generally acceptable. However, properly established. It was philosophically
Inclusions and properly expressed. Thus, the delineation,
exclusion and inclusion within the study were there are some aspects of delineation, exclusion delineating the things that shall be included and
4 -
Exclusions exclusion or inclusion were not understandable.
still significantly confusing. or inclusions that needs to be clarified. excluded in the study.
Although the research paradigm gave illustrative The research paradigm was clearly expounded
The research paradigm was very confusing and The research paradigm was generally confusing
synopsis of the whole processes of the and it comprehensively gave illustrative
Framework did not give illustrative synopsis of the whole and gave very little illustrative synopsis of the
proposal, there is still a need for minor synopsis of the whole processes of the research
6 -
processes of the research proposal. whole processes of the research proposal.
enhancements proposal
Related literature and projects were Related literature and projects were presented Related literature and projects were annotated Related literature and projects were well
Related unannotated and confusing. It did not but not properly annotated. The attempt to relate and corroborated. However, there still a need to annotated, well-presented and successfully
Literature corroborate the profundity of theoretical it is not visible and did not corroborate the further explication on how the literature would corroborated the profundity of theoretical
5 -
framework. profundity of theoretical framework. reinforce the theoretical framework. framework.
Research Methodology, Framework, and Analysis 55 -
The presented enhanced methodology in a way
The presented methodology needs significant
The presented methodology does not warrant is manifesting the achievement of objectives. The presented enhanced methodology is
Methodology
achievement of the research objectives.
revisions to ensure that the objectives would be
However, some minor clarifications should be gearing towards the fulfillment of the objectives.
20 -
satisfied.
done
 There were presented further plans and
The presented further plans and procedures did The further plans and procedures presented There were a clear presented further plans and
Presentation of further procedures that would guarantee the fulfillment
Plans and Procedures
not guarantee that the objectives of the study were just a little assurances that the objectives
of research objectives. However some minor
procedures that would guarantee the fulfillment 5 -
would be met. would be satisfied. of research objectives.
clarifications are need.
The gathered data is almost enough to sustain
The gathered data was logically presented. Its
Presentation of There was an obvious need to restart the There was a need to further gather significant the process of analysis to achieve the
Gathered Data gathering of data. amount or volume of data. objectives. However, there are few more sets of
comprehensiveness assures the readiness for 15 -
analysis.
information that needs to be established.
The presentation of initial results manifest the The presentation of initial results manifest a The initial result or findings was impressively
The initial result or findings was impressively
need to restart the whole processes including need for revisiting the methodologies and the presented and manifest systematic and
Initial Findings
the gathering of data. The presentation was veracity of the gathered data. The presentation reputable process. However, the manner it was
presented and manifest systematic and 15 -
reputable process.
confusing and chaotic. process needs improvement. presented has some minor glitches.
Oral Presentation 15 -
The students failed to clearly and confidently The student at least showed effort to orally Generally, the student was able to explain his or The students clearly and confidently explained
explain his or her propositions. The usage of explain the proposition. However, there were her propositions although there are few his or her propositions in professional language.
Oral Presentation oral communication tool manifested lack of very obvious manifestations of confusions and apprehensive moments. There are very few Furthermore, the student confidently gave 10 -
confidence and fluency. The student cannot inconsistencies. Most of the time, the student instances that the student failed to give rejoinder rejoinder and comprehensive explications to all
answer or give rejoinder to the panel’s question. cannot give rejoinder to the panel’s query. to panel’s inquiry. panel inquiries.
The visual and graphical enhancement was
The students did not visibly supply matured, well
The student’s visual and graphical enhancement generally reasonable and conscientious effort is The students visibly supplied mature, and well-
prepared graphical and visual enhancements
Graphics was poor and almost indecipherable. Although, very visible. There are only few negligible prepared graphical and visual enhancements
Enhancements
during his or her presentation as a way of giving
there is a manifestation of conscientious effort, inaccuracies. In a way, the supporting graphics during his or her presentation as a way of giving
5 -
profound explications to his propositions. The
the enhancement outcome is very rudimentary. helped in giving due explications to the profound explications to the propositions.
visual aids were poorly done.
propositions
TOTAL
PASSED PASSED PASSED FAILED (Simply sum up the ‘grade’ in each row.)
REMARKS
with no revisions with minor revisions with major revisions THE PASSING GRADE IS 75% AND UP.
0.00
(please encircle)

NAME OF JUROR

SIGNATURE DATE