Rabbi Ben Ezra
Rabbi Ben Ezra
1
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/robert-browning
1
What is he but a brute
Whose flesh has soul to suit,
Whose spirit works lest arms and legs want play?
To man, propose this test—
Thy body at its best,
How far can that project thy soul on its lone way?
2
For note, when evening shuts,
A certain moment cuts
The deed off, calls the glory from the grey:
A whisper from the west
Shoots—"Add this to the rest,
Take it and try its worth: here dies another day."
3
But all, the world's coarse thumb
And finger failed to plumb,
So passed in making up the main account;
All instincts immature,
All purposes unsure,
That weighed not as his work, yet swelled the man's amount:
4
So, take and use Thy work:
Amend what flaws may lurk,
What strain o' the stuff, what warpings past the aim!
My times be in Thy hand!
Perfect the cup as planned!
Let age approve of youth, and death complete the same!
The poem is narrated by Rabbi Ben Ezra, a real 12th-century scholar. The piece does not have a clearly
identified audience or dramatic situation. The Rabbi begs his audience to "grow old along with [him]" (line
1). He stresses that age is where the best of life is realized, whereas "youth shows but half" (line 6). He
acknowledges that youth lacks insight into life, since it is characteristically so concerned with living in the
moment that it is unable to consider the deeper questions.
Though youth will fade, what replaces it is the wisdom and insight of age, which recognizes that pain is a
part of life, but which learns to appreciate joy more because of the pain. "Be our joys three parts pain!"
(line 34). All the while, one should appreciate what comes, since all adds to our growth towards God, and
embrace the "paradox" that life's failure brings success. He notes how, when we are young and our
bodies are strong, we aspire to impossible greatness, and he explains that this type of action makes man
into a "brute" (line 44).
With age comes acceptance and love of the flesh, even though it pulls us "ever to the earth" (line 63),
while some yearn to reach a higher plane. A wise, older man realizes that all things are gifts from God,
and the flesh's limitations are to be appreciated even as we recognize them as limitations.
His reason for begging patience is that our life on Earth is but one step of our soul's experience, and so
our journey will continue. Whereas youth is inclined to "rage" (line 100), age is inclined to await death
patiently. Both are acceptable and wonderful, and each compliments the other.
What complicates the philosophy is that we are wont to disagree with each other, to have different values
and loves. However, the Rabbi begs that we not give too much credence to the earthly concerns that
engender argument and dissention, and trust instead that we are given by God and hence are fit for this
struggle. The transience of time does not matter, since this is only one phase of our existence; we need
not grow anxious about disagreements and unrealized goals, since the ultimate truth is out of our reach
anyway. Again, failure breeds success. He warns against being distracted by the "plastic circumstance"
(line 164) of the present moment.
He ends by stressing that all is part of a unified whole, even if we cannot glimpse the whole. At the same
time that age should approve of youth and embrace the present moment, it must also be constantly
looking upwards towards a heaven to come and hence simultaneously willing to renounce the present.
2
Cedars, S.R.. Joyce, Meghan ed. "Robert Browning: Poems “Rabbi Ben Ezra” Summary and Analysis".
GradeSaver, 27 January 2013 Web. 11 July 2017. http://www.gradesaver.com/robert-browning-
poems/study-guide/summary-rabbi-ben-ezra
5
Analysis
"Rabbi Ben Ezra" is unique in Browning's oeuvre of dramatic monologues because though it is written
from the perspective of a historical figure, it does not contain any clear audience or dramatic situation. As
such, it is more a philosophical text than a proper poem. Much of its meaning is dissected in the
"Summary" above, though this section will provide some context and simplification.
Rabbi Ben Ezra was a real historical figure of the 12th century, known primarily for his philosophy that
suggested good sometimes lies in its opposite (badness, or pain). Browning often takes a figure from the
past and uses dramatic irony to propose a conflict between the words and the meaning, but here, lacking
any sense of the audience to whom he speaks (a congregation? God? Himself?) or of any stakes (what
he hopes to gain), we are merely to dissect the philosophy.
The Rabbi's philosophy is a paradox: the struggles of life hold little meaning since life is but our soul's first
step, yet the wise man should appreciate everything about life. He praises old age as the time when our
soul reaches best fruition on earth, because only in age can this paradox be appreciated. The Rabbi is
willing to admire and appreciate every stage of life, even as he is quick to show the folly of those stages.
For instance, youth operates from a place of carpe diem, 'seizing the day' constantly, and trying to
transcend the limits of the body. The Rabbi notes that with age comes an awareness of the pain and
difficulty of life, but he says that a wise man should not be weighted down but rather lightened by that
realization. He preaches that we should accept the present, but not let the concerns of the present
dominate us. What lies at the center of his creed is patience and complicity to what comes. He does not
deny the basic tenants of a carpe diem philosophy: time is short and transient; the body does not keep its
youth; the world is full of wonderful things to be exploited. But at the same time, he believes that focusing
on the ways of the world distracts us from our greater goal, which is to continue growing even in the
afterlife.
However, it is important to see that while he praises age as superior, it is only superior because it
recognizes the beauty of youth's yearnings. Without the latter, the former does not have the insight to
both admire and renounce such actions. The most important lesson we learn in old age is that we can
know nothing and never truly transcend ourselves. By accepting this limitation, we learn to be content and
patient as we near death, which is not an end but a release to a greater sphere where our soul may
continue to grow.
The Rabbi embraces body and soul, youth and age, death and life, pain and joy, all the while recognizing
that the contradictions are the goal. They are beyond our comprehension, and by accepting that can we
find true serenity.
3
http://www.bobforrestweb.co.uk/The_Rubaiyat/Appendices/app08.htm
6
Rabbi being the opposite number to FitzGerald’s Omar. Instead of a nihilistic “live for today” approach to
life, Browning’s Rabbi ben Ezra sees life’s trials and tribulations as a road to spiritual development and
maturity of soul. Rather than holding onto today and prolonging our youth, with all its follies, we should
welcome the wisdom and understanding of God’s Plan which we gain as we progress through life’s
troubles to old age and, ultimately, to death. The first two lines of Browning’s poem are in direct
opposition to FitzGerald’s regret “that Youth’s sweet-scented Manuscript should close!” (verse 72) The
whole first verse reads as follows:
In other words, old age is the best part of life, for which youth is a preparation. We must trust God, and
not be afraid. In verse 2, the Rabbi decries the follies of youth, whilst at the same time (verse 3) valuing
the doubts of youth as part of our development. In verse 4 The Rabbi again directly opposes Omar’s “eat,
drink and be merry” philosophy:
In other words, life is more than just joy and feasting! (This last line is a good example of the obscurity of
Browning as opposed to the directness of FitzGerald – the line means that the sated bird or beast feels
nothing beyond its fullness.)
Verses 6 and 7 are again in direct opposition to Omar and his “sorry scheme of things”, for here the Rabbi
places value on life’s problems, because they are part of our developmental process. Paradoxically, they
are not problems but valuable lessons:
As the Rabbi says in verse 9, “How good to live and learn!” In verse 10, the Rabbi praises God’s plan,
which he now realizes is perfect. He then thanks God that he is a human being, and expresses his trust in
God’s purposes. Verses 11 &12 are rather obscure references to life as a mutually supportive mixture of
body and soul, and to getting the balance right in meeting the needs of both: “Life may err as gravely by
7
being over-spiritual as over-worldly.” (Edward Berdoe, Browning’s Message to his Time: his Religion,
Philosophy, and Science (1890), p.205.) In verse 13, we return to spiritual development through ageing:
In other words, spiritual development is what distinguishes Man from Beast. Verses 14 to 18 further extol
the virtues of the ageing process, to the point where death is seen as the natural culmination of that
process: “Thou waitedst age: wait death nor be afraid!” (verse 19) Verses 20 to 25 debate the relative
worth of the events in one’s life (the virtue of work, for example), arriving at the conclusion (verse 25) that
the sum total of those events – both good and bad – measures one’s worth in the eyes of God. It is at this
point that the Rabbi begins his rebuttal to Omar’s Potter, referring to “God, whose wheel the pitcher
shaped.” Verse 26 reads thus:
The last three lines of this verse, of course, are directly opposed to Omar’s “drink, and live for today”
philosophy. Verses 27 & 28 read:
Verse 27 tells us that our souls and God endure through Time and Change; verse 28 that Time and
Change are the mechanism by which our souls are given chance to develop. These ideas are expanded
in subsequent verses, the final verse – verse 32 – ending with the notable line: “Let age approve of youth,
and death complete the same!”
Rabbi ben Ezra is not easy to follow in a lot of places and so, as stated earlier, it lacks the immediacy and
impact of FitzGerald’s verses. Obscurity was a common complaint leveled against Browning’s poetry
generally. For example, the art historian Anna Jameson summed things up nicely when she wrote that
whilst she admired “the wondrous wisdom and subtlety of thought” of Browning’s poetry, she did not
admire his “obscurity in the expression of the thought”!