0% found this document useful (0 votes)
92 views

Civil Procedure B

This document provides a summary of Philippine remedial law principles across 5 topics: 1) General principles of jurisdiction and differences between substantive and procedural law. 2) Specific laws governing jurisdiction of courts and basic principles such as jurisdiction being conferred by law, not agreement of parties. 3) Rules governing parties to a civil action. 4) Rules regarding subject matter and grounds for intervention in a case. 5) Hierarchy of courts and effects of lack of jurisdiction such as a case being null and void.

Uploaded by

Katz Betito
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
92 views

Civil Procedure B

This document provides a summary of Philippine remedial law principles across 5 topics: 1) General principles of jurisdiction and differences between substantive and procedural law. 2) Specific laws governing jurisdiction of courts and basic principles such as jurisdiction being conferred by law, not agreement of parties. 3) Rules governing parties to a civil action. 4) Rules regarding subject matter and grounds for intervention in a case. 5) Hierarchy of courts and effects of lack of jurisdiction such as a case being null and void.

Uploaded by

Katz Betito
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

COUKSLOUTi-INF-

(-iuilfr.,."Jr'"

{s s ista nt .!o Ii.ito. (-1. n. r.,| \'t a rissa pl a ca...ig-f u iI|.'',


2010-2011

ReferenceBook: Regolodo,F.RemedialLow Compendium,Vol. 7

of RemedialLaw
l. GeneralPrinciples -'

A) DifferencebetweenSubstantiveLawand ProcedureLaw
. B e rn a b evs A l e j o ,7 4 SCRA180
B) Objectiveof ProceduralLaw
. K ovs P N B G.R, .N o s.1691,1,- 32,
Januar y20,2006
C) Applicationof ProceduralLaws
. S p s.D e l o sS a n to svs v dade Mangubat, G.R.No.149508,October10,2007
. B o rrevs C A ,1 5 8S C RA 560 ( 1988)
c C A ,G.R .No. L4l- 530,
R e p u b l ivs Mar chL8,2003
. Ma g a l l a n evs
s S u nY at Sen ElementarSchool,
y G.R.No. 160876,Januar y
19,2009

l l . J u r i sd i cti o n

A) Laws:

1) A rt.8 , S e c.1 , 1 9 8 7C onstitution


2) B a ta s P a mb a n saBldg., L29 ( ' An Act Reor ganizinlthe Judic i ar y ,
A p p ro p ri a ti nFgu n d sTher eforand , fr otherpur poses")
3) R A N o . 7 9 0 2(" A nA c t Expanding the Jur isdiction of the Cour tof Appeal s ,
A me n d i n g fo r th e p u rposeSection9 of B.P.129"1
4) R A 7 6 9 1 ('A n A ct Expanding the Jur isdiction of the M etr opolitanT r i al
C o u rts,Mu n i ci p aTl ri alCour tsand MunicipalCir cuitTr ialCour ts,Amen di ng
th e P u rp o se o f B .PL. 29"\
5 ) S C A d m i n i s t r a t i vNeo . 0 9 - 9 4( " G u i d e l i n ei sn t h e l m p l e m e n t a t i oonf R A
769r"\
6) R A 8 6 9 ('A n A ct E s tablishing FamilyCour ts,Gr antingthem Exc l us i v e
O r i g i n a l J u r i s d i c toi o
ven rC h i l da n d F a m i l C
y ases")
7) S e c.5 .2 ,C h a p telrl o R.A.8799( "TheSecur ities Code)
S ) S .CA . .M. N o .0 1 -2 -04- SC ( "lnter imRulesof Pr ocedur es for Intr a- Corpor ate
Controversies")
. R e a dC a l l e j vs a P anday, G.R.No. 168696,Febr uar 28,2006 y
9 ) A .M. N o .0 8 -0 -7R u l esof Pr ocedurfor e SmallClaim s( October0L, 2008)

Page1 of 18
B ) B a si cP ri n ci p l e s

of the par ties


n n fe rredby law and not by agr eement
1 ) Ju ri sd i cti oco
. S p o u seAs tu e lvs Spouses Valdez,G.R.No. 139561- , 10,2003
June
. Zamoravs CA,183 SCRA279
2 ) D e te rmi n ebdy th e l aw in for ceat the tim e of com m encem ent
. D e l aC ru zvs Mo ya,10 SCRA 838
3 ) D e t e r m i n ebdy t h e a l l e g a t i oonf t h e c o m p l a i not r o t h e ri n i t i a t o r py l e a d i n g
. C h i n gv s M a l a y a1, 5 3S C R A 412
. T i me ,In c.vs R e yes, 39 SCRA 303 ( 1971)
4 ) Ju ri sd i cti oonve rth e par ties
. Agravante vs Patriarca, 183SCRA113
. N a va l evs C o u rto f Appeals, G.R.No. L09957,Febr uar 20, y L996
5 ) D i ffe re n ce b e tw e e nJur isdiction and Exer cise of Jur isdiction
. Platinum . o .1 3 3 3 6 5S, e p t e m b e1r6 ,2 0 0 3
T o u r sv s P a n l i l i oG, . R N
6 ) D i ffe re n ce b e tw e e nJur isdiction andVenue
. D a va oL i g h ta n d PowerCo.,Inc.vs Cour tof Appeals, 363SCRA 396
. N o cu mvsT a n ,G.R.No. 145022,Septem ber 23,2005
7) Paymentof DocketFees
. ManchesterDev't.Corp. VsCA,19 SCRA562 (May7, L987)
. S u nIn su ra n ce vs Asuncion, L7OSCRA 274 ( 1989)
. B a ra n g aPyi a pvs i Talip,G.R.No. 138248, Septem ber 7,2O05
. P R O T OP Ni l i p i n aCs o r p o r a t i ovns B a n q u eN a t i o n a l eD e P a r i sG , . R .N o .
1,5L242, June15,2005
' S p o u sedse L e o nv s CA,287SCRA 94
. T o ki o Ma ri n e MalayaInsur anceCo., Inc. vs Jor geValdez,G.R . N o.
1 5 0 1 0 8Ja, n u a ry28,2OO8
. L u vs L u ,G.R .N o. 1- 53690/G.R. No. L5738t/G.R. No. t70889,Augus t4,
2009
8) Staggered DocketFee
. S p s.Gre g o ri o Go andJuanaTanGovs Tong,G.R.151942,Novem e b r 27,
2003
. A M N o , 0 4 -2 -0 4- SC, Re:Amendmentof Section21' ( i\,Rule141 o f the
R u l e so f C o u rt[A.M .No.04- 2- 04- SC, AugustL6,2004]by Clar ifyi ng the
Ma n n e ro f P a ymentof the Incr eased Feesfor Cor por ateRehabi l i tati on
P e ti ti o n s,T a ki n gInto Accountthe Cour t' slssuance in Amendmenton
th e C l a ri fi ca ti oon n the LegalFeesto be Collected in Casesof Cor por ate
R e h a b i l i ta ti o[A.M
n . No. 00- 8- ]- Q- SC, Decembert0, 2021,Septem ber
19,2006
9 ) A d h e re n ce to Ju ri sdiction; Jur isdiction cannotbe ousted
Leevs MTCof Legaspi City,1-45SCRA408
. D i o q u i n vos C r u z t, L 6 S C R A 451(1982)
. R a mo svs C e n tralbank,41 SCRA 565

Poge2 of 18
10 )E ffe ct o f l a cko f Ju ri sdiction
. A b b a i nvs C h u a 22SCRA748
,
. Mu n i ci p a l i ty o f A ntipolovs CA,133SCRA 320
. Estoesta, Sr.vs CA,I79 SCRA203
. S u a re vs z C A ,1 8 6SCRA 339
. T i j a mvs S i b o n g hanoy, et. al.,23 SCRA 29 ( 1968)
L 1 )S u s p e n d eJdu r i s d i c t i o n
. PALvs Kurangking, 389 SCRA588 ..
1-2 )H i e ra rch o fyC o u rts .'
. Ou a n ovs P GT TInter national Investment Cor p.( 384SCRA 589)
. A g a ne a li r T e r m i n a l G
, t . a l .V s P h i l i p p i nIen t e r n a t i o nA s ,. R .N o . l - 5 5 0 0 1 ,
Ma y 5 , 2 0 0 3

s to 6 , R OC
l l l . R u l e1 , S e cti o n 1
. Redefra vs CA,G.R.No. 1,466L1., February06,2007
. V d ad e V i cto ri avs CA,G.R.No. 147550, Januar y06,2007
. H e r n a n d evzs R u r aB 75
l a n k8, 1 S C R A
- . Govs U C P BG.R , .No. LGL87, Novem bert1' ,2004
. P e d e ra n gvs a H o n.Buissan, G.R.No.L- 49475 28,1993
Septem ber
. P h i l i p p i nN
e a ti o nalBankvs Cour tof Appeals, 153SCRA437( 1987)
. Tesorero vs Mathay,185SCRA328
Ma n i l aH o te lvs CA,384SCRA 515

lV. Rule2, Sectionl to 6

' R e b o l l i dvs
o C A ,170SCRA 800 ( 1989)
. D eGu zma nJr vs lAC,192SCRA 507( 1990)
. BaliwaT Incvs.Ople,171-SCRA
g ra n si t, 250 ( 1989)
. B a ch ra ch 68 Phils287
Mo to rsvs lcar angal,
. A g u sti nvs B a ca l an,135SCRA 340 ( 1985)
. 144SCRA
F l ro e svs Ma l l a re- Philipps, 377 ( L986)
' S p s.D e ce n avs S ps.Piquer o, G.R.No. L55736,Mar ch31,2005

V. Rule3 - Section1 to 3: Partiesto a CivilAction


. l ro na n dS te e A l u thor ityvs CA,249SCRA 538 ( 1995)
. T ra veWil d eA ssociated Sales,Inc.vs CAL99SCRA 205( 1991)
. R a l avs R a l l a1, 9 9SCRA 495 ( 1991)
. T a mp i n g co vs l A C,207SCRA 652
. H o u sel n te rn a tionalBuildingTenantsAssoc.vs lAC, 151 SCRA703
(1e87)
o P a scu avs l P a scual, G.R.No. 157830,Novembert7,2005
' Go l a n g ovsJo n eB. Fung,G.R.No. 157952, September 8,2009
. . E q u i ta b l eP C IB ank,Inc. ( now known as BancoDe Or o- EPCl,lnc .)v s

Poge3 of 18
H e i rso f A n to n i oC.Tiu,et. al.,G.R.No. L78529,
Septem ber
04,2009

Vl. Rule3, Sections4 to 6: Partiesto a CivilAction


. Wongvs lAC,200 SCRA792
. B e g o sa
vs C h a i rm an,
PVA,32 SCRA 66 ( 1970)
. Mo b i lP h i l vs. Ar r astr e( 18SCRAIL20)( 1966)
. C ustom s,
. A me ri ca nE xp re ssCo.vs Santiago, 49 SCRA 75 ( 1.973)
. P a n tra n co G.R.No. 14Q746,
vs B u ncan, Mar ch1.6,2005

Vll. Rule3, Sections7 to 12 (Partiesto a Civilnction)


. L o za n o vs B a l l e ser os,
L95SCRA 681 ( 1991)
. D a e lvsT e ve s, 1 3 6SCRA199( 1- 985)
. S e n ovs Ma n g u bat,156SCRA11- 3( 1987)
. L o tteP h i l svs D e laCr uz,G.R.No. 1,663302,
July28,2005
. Qu i o mb o n vs g C our tof Appeals, L89SCRA 325 ( 1990)
. D o mi n g ovs S ch eer421 , SCRA 468
. C h u avsT o rre s, G.R.No. 151900,August30, 2005
- . L i a n a 's
S u p e rmaar ket vs NLRC,G.R.No. 1,LI0L4M ay 3 j- ,1995
. R e p u b l ivs
c C a mpos, G.R.No.84895,May4, t989

Vlll. Rule3, Sections13 to 19: Partiesto a CivilAction

. C h i a n gK a iS h e kSchoolvs CA,G.R.No.58028,Apr il18,1989


. A tty.L a vi n a vs C our tof Appeals, 171SCRA 691( 1989)
. L a w a svs C A ,1 4 6SCRA173( 198)
. Vda.De Salazar vs CA,G.R.No. I2I5L0
. B o n i fa ci oe,t. a l .Vs Hon.Dizon,et. al.,( 1989)
. T h e H e i rso f th e the late Flor entina Nuguidvda de Haber ervs CA ,104
scR As3 4 (1 9 8 1 _)
. Atty.RogelioE.Sarbasa vs Fevda de Te,represented by her Attorney-in-
fa ctF a u sti nC o a stafieda, G.R.No. 175910, July30,2009
. D a g a d avsg T o n gnawa, G.R.No. 161166- 67, Febr uar03, y 2005
' C a r a n d a nvgs H e i r so f Q u i r i n od e G u z m a nG, . R .N o . 1 6 - 3 4 7N
, ovember
29,2006

lX. Rule3, Sections18 to 22: Partiesto a CivilAction


. R u mu a l d evs z T i glao,G.R.No. 51.I5L,July24,I98t
. T h eB o a rdo f L i quidatorvss Heir sof M aximoM . Kalaw20 SCRA19 67
. A g u a svs L l e mo s5, SCRA 595

Page4 of L8
X. Rule4 Venue
. Govs U C P Be, t. al.G.R.No. L56I87,November' 1,L,2004
. S a l u d ovs.a me ri canExr ess, G.R.No. L59507, Apr il16,2006
. H o e ch stP h i l i p pines, 83 SCRA297( 1978)
Inc.petitionervs Tor r es,
. S u ri g a o C e n tu rySawmillvs CA,218SCRA 623
. P h i l i p p i nB
e a n ki ng vsTensuan,
Cor por ation 230SCRA4L3( 1994)
. Ge smu n dvs o JR BRealtyCor por ation,234 SCRA153( 1994)
. P h i l .B a n ko f C o mm er cevs Lim ,G.R.No. 159507, Apr ilL9,2006
. U n i te dOve rse as Bankvs Rosem or M inngand Dev' t,G.R.No. 159669

Xl. Rule5: UniformProcedurein TrialCourts


L a w :R u l eo n S u mma ryP rocedur(eSCResolution
dateOctober15,1991)

A . M .N o . 0 2 - 1 1 - 0 9 - S C

S e c.L A (2 )o f th e R e vi se d Ruleson Summ ar yPr ocedur es is amendedto r e adas


f o l lo w s:
'(2 ) A l l o th e r c ases,except pr obate pr oceedings, wher e the total
a mo u n to f th e plaintiff' sclam does not exceedon hundr edthous and
p e so s(P 1 0 0 ,0 00.00) or , two hundr edthousandpesos( P200,00 0.00) in
Me tro p o l i ta Manila,
n exclusive of inter estan cost"
T h ea me n d me nto t o k e ffe c ton November25,2002

. y C A ,2 24SCRA
B a yu b avs 557 ( 1993)
. Januar31,
A,M . No.MTJ- 99- 1226,
L u ca svs F a b ro s, y 2000
. B o n g a to
vs Ma l v arG.R.
; No.1,4L614,August1.4,2002
. P a scu avsl Jo ve llanos, 390SCRA 333
. L u n avs Mi ra fu e ne,A.M. No.MTJ- 05- I- 610,
September 26,2005
. vs B P l ,G.R.No.L75490,September
Ma ca l i n o l- 9,2009

X l l . R u l e5 : K i n so f P l e a d i n g s
. C a l ovs A j a x,2 2 SCRA 996 ( 1968)
. R e ye vs s C A ,3 8 SCRA138( 1971)
. C h a nvs C A ,2 3 0SCRA 685
. ICTSIvs CA,214 SCRA456 (1992)
. Me ta l sE n g i n e er ing r esour ces vs CA203SCRA273lt992l
Cor por ation
. C o j u a n g co vs V i l legas,et. al. 184SCRA 374 ( 1990)
. A g a n avs L a g man, G.R.No. 139018,Apr il1,1,,2005
. S i n g a p o re A i rl n esvs CA,243SCRA143( 1995)

Page5 of 18
Xlll. R u l e7 : P a rtso f P l e adings
. Qu i mp ovs D e l aVictor ia, 46 SCRA1,39( L972)
. Buenaventura vs Uy,et., L49SCRA22 (L987)
. S a mme rOve rseas Placem ent
Agency,lnc.vs Mildr edR. Santose, t. al .
G.R.No. 152579,August4,2009
. B u a nvs L o p e z,G.R.No.75349,October13,L986
. S h p si d eIn c.vs C A,G.R.No. t43377,Febr uar 20,2001. y
. L o q u i svs Offi ceof he Om budsm 4pr August
, 2000
. D o e n av s L a p e s u r a , 3 5S5C R A658
. S to .T o ma sU n i ver sity vs Sur la,294SCRA 382 ( 1998)
. C a g a yaV n a l l e yvs Com m issioner of Inter nalRevenue, G.R.No. L5'J .41.3,
F e b ru a ry 1 3 ,2 0 08
. F i d e lO . C h u a a n d F i l i d e nR e a l t ya n d D e v e l o p m e nCt o r p o r a t i o vns
Me tro p o l i ta n B ankand Tr ustCom pany, et. al. G,R.No. 1.8231.L A ugus
, t
19,2009

XlV. R u l e8 : Ma n n e ro f M akingallegations in pleadimngs


Vdade Daffonvs CA,387 SCRA427 (ultimatefact)
. T o ri b i ovs B i d i n ,134SCRA162( 1985)
. B o u g ha n d B o u ghvs Cantiver os, 40 Phil209 ( 1919)
. H i b b e rdvs R h o de,32 Phil476( t9I5\
. Ja b a l d vs
e P N B 7, SCRA79L ( L963\
. CentralSuretyvs CNNHodges,38 SCRAL59(1971)
. C o n so l i d a teBda nkvs Del Monte Motor W or ks,July29,2005,G.R .N o.
1 .4 3 3 3 8
Ju, l y2 9 ,2005
. Me mi tavs Ma songsong, G.R.No. I509I2, May 28,2007
. C a p i toMol to rsvs Yabut,32 SCRA1 ( 1970)
. A n ta mC o n so l i dated, 34 ( 1986)
Inc.et. al.vs CA,et. al. 143SCRA
. Me ri l lL yn chF u tur es, CA,G.R.No.97816,July24,1992
. R e ye vs s R T CB ranch142G.R.No. 165744,August1L,2008

XV.Rule
9
. e r i t i s hC o . ,I n c . ,e t . a l . v s D e l o sA n g e l e s6, 3 S C R A5 0
T h e P h i l i p p i nB
(1s7sl
. D u l o svs C A ,1 -8 8SCRA 413 ( 1990)
. Go ch a n g coe,t. al. vs CFINegr osOccidental, et. al. ( G.R.No. L- 49396,
J a n u a r 1y 5 ,1 9 8 8 )
. In d i a n aA e ro sp ace of HigherEducation,
Univ.vs.Comm ission 356 SC R A
367(2oorl
. Mo n zo nvs L7, 2008
G.R.No. t7L827, Septem ber
, S p s.Relova,

Page6 of 18
XV l . R u l e1 0 :A me n d e da nd supplemental Pleadings
. L e o b re ra vs C A ,G.R.No.8000L,Febr uar27,1989y
. T h eP a sa C y i tyGover nment vs CFl,132SCRA156( 1984)
. Torresvs CA,131SCRA24 (t984\
. V e rso za vs C A ,2 99SCRA100
. Ma g a sp e et. al.,115SCRA1- 93( 1982)
i , t. a l .vs Ram olete,
. MWS Svs C Aa n dthe Cityof Dagupan, 143SCRA 623 ( 1986)
. N o rth e rnC e me ntCor por ation vs..lACand ShipsideIncor por ated
, [G.R .
y 19881
N o .L -6 8 6 3 6F, e br uar 29, .,
. V a l e n zu e vs l a C A,G.R.No. 131175,August28,2001,63SCRA 779
. S p s.L a mb i n ovs Hon. Pr esiding Judge,G.R.No. L69551,Janua r y24,
2007
. P h i l i p p i n eP o r t s A u t h o r i t yv s W i l l i a m G o t h o n g ,G . R . N o . 1 5 8 4 0 1 - ,
Ja n u a ry2 8 ,2 0 0 8

XVll. R u l e1 1 :Wh e nto fi l e r esponsive


Pleadings
. D e lB ro svs l A C ,159SCRA 533
. S p o u seB s a rra zavs Cam pos, L20SCRA 8881( 1983)

XVlll. R u l e1 2 :B i l lo f P a rticular
. S a l i tavs Ma g to l is,233 SCRA100( 1994)
. A g ca n avs s Me rc ado,7 SCRA 688( 1963)
. Santosvs Liwag,101SCRA327 (19801

XlX. R u l e1 : F i l i n g
. B a rra me dvs a C astillo, 78 SCRA ( 1977)
. P N Bvs C F Io f R i zal,209SCRA ( 19921
. H e rn a n d e z, e t. a l. vs The Honor ablePer dr oC. Navar r o,et. al.,48 SC R A
4s (19721
. Qu e l n a nvs V H FG.R. , No. L38500,September 16,2005
. Ga rru ch o vs C A ,G.R>No. L43791- Januar
, y1,4,2007
. SolaT r e a mE n te r tainment vs Ricafor te,203SCRA 661( 1998)
. A me nvs C A ,G.R.No. L43424, August- ,200L
' P e fro so vs D o n a G.R.
, No. 154018,Apr il3,207
. H e i rso f E u g e n i oLopezvs Hon.Enr iquez, G.R.No.146262, Janu ar 21,,
y
2007
. Ga rvi d a Jr .,G.R.No.124893,
vs S a l e s, Apr il18,1997

X X . R u l e1 4 :S u mmo n sS e cs.1 to 14
. P a ra mo u nltn su r anceCor por ation
vs Maximo M. Japzon,et al ., 2L1-
- scRA87e(19921
. , c.vs C astr o,175SCRA1- 71( 1989)
S yj u coIn
. v C h u ,L48SCRA
B o ti ca n o 541 ( 1987)
.

Poge7 of 18
. P a nA si a ti cT ra vel, Cor p.vs CA,G.R.No.L- 6278t,August1- 9,1988
. Mapavs CA,et. al.,214 SCRA4I7 (1,992)
. S a n d o vavs l H re t,G.R.No. 149380, July3, 2000
. Oa mi n avs l C a stillo, G.R.No.1.52776, October8, 2003
. Masonvs CA,G.R.No.144662, OctoberL3,2003
. Josevs Boyon,G.R.No. L47369,October23,2003
. D o ma g avs s Je n sen, G.R.No. 158407, Januar yt7,2005
. B i a covs P h i l .C o untr yRur al,Bankr .G.R. No.161417,Febr uar8,20 y 07
. B a n ko f t h e P h i l i p p i nles l a n d vs s - S a n t i a gGo.,R .N o . L 6 9 1 1 6M , a r c h2 8 , '
2007
. T h e P h i l i p p i nAe m e r i c a nL i f e& G e n e r aIl n s u r a n cC e o m p a n yv s H o n .
A u g u stoV . B re va,G.R.No. 1.47937, NovemberL1,,2004
. S a n to svs P N OCExplor ation Cor por ation, G.R.No. 170943,Septem ber
23,2008
. A l e xa n d eTr a m Wong vs Cather ineFactor - KoyomG.R. a, No. 1- 83802,
S e p te mb et7 r ,2 009
. S a n s i oP h i l i p p i n e Isn, c .v s S p s .A l i c i aL e o d e g a r iM
o o g o l ,J r . ,G . R .N o .
L77007,july L4,2009
. B D L o n gS p a nB u i l d e r sl,n c . v s R . S .A m e p l o q u i oR e a l t yD e v ' t . ,G . R .
N o .1 6 9 9 1 9S,e p tem ber LL,2009

XXl. Rule14,Secs.15 to 20
. C a ri a gvsa Ma l a ya,143SCRA 441 ( 1986)
. L i ca rovs s L i ca ros,G.R,No. 150656,Apr il29,2003
, . D e Mi d g e l yvs F er andos, 64 SCRA 23 ( 1975\
. Busuegovs CA,151SCRA376 (1987)
. P i n l a cvs C A ,Ja n uar yL9,200L
. Go n za l evs Januar y25,200t
Cor p.G.R.No. 1,49765,
s S ta tePr oper ties

XXll. R u l e1 5 :Mo ti o n sS ecs.1to 10


. D e l aP e n avs D e laPena,258SCRA 298
' Manacopvs CA,215SCRA773 (L992)
. Yapvs CA,115SCRA105
. Azajarvs CA,145SCRA333
. S a rmi e n to vs Z a ralan, Febr uar 5,2007
G.R.No.16747L, y
. AnecoRealtyDev'tvs Landex,G.R.No. 165952,July28, 2008

Xx l l l . R u l e1 5 :Mo ti o nto Dismiss


. V i ta n g co lvs N ew Vista Pr oper ties,Inc. et. al., G.R. No. L7 6014,
S e p te mb e1r 7 ,2 009
. Barraza vs Campos,Jr.I20 SCRA881 (1983)
' . Panganiba l o r p3
v sn P i l i p i n aSsh e C 624
. 9 5S C R A
. . BAFinancevs Pineda,119SCRA493(1982)

Page8 of 18
. o f B iffanLaguna
Mu n i ci p a l i ty vs CA,219SCRA69
. Guerrerovs RTCof llocos,229 SCRA274
. R a mo svs P e ra l ta, 203SCRA 412
. C h u a vs A n g , G.R. No. I56t64, Septem ber4, 2009 ( excepti onto
e xh a u sti oonf a d ministr ative r emedies)
. A n to n i oN a va rrovs Metr opolitanBankand Tr ustCom pany/Cl ar i P.
ta
N a va rro vs Me tr opolitan Bank and Tr ust Com pany,G.R, N o.
1.65697/G.R. No. 1.56481, August4,2009
. BancoDe Oro-EPCl, G.R.No. 1'81235,July22,
Inc. vs John.-iansipek,
2009

XXIV. Rule17: Dismissal of Actions


. D a e vsl S p s.B e l tr an, G.R.No. 156470,Apr il30,2008
' Go vs Cruz,I72 SCRA247
. Ja o vevs r Y to ri a ga, October28, L977
et. al.,G.R.No.L- 35989,
' V a l l a n g ca
e ,t. a l .vs CA,et. al.,G.R.No.55336,M ay4, 1989
. Mo n te j ovs U ro ti a,40 SCRA 41

XXV. Rule18: Pre-trial

A .M. N o .0 3 -1 -0 9 -S "Rule
C, to be Obser ved
on Guidelines by the Tr ialC our t
and Useof
s n dC l e rkso f Cour tin the conductof Pr e- tr ial
Ju d g e a
D e p o si ti o ni-d measu
sco ve ry r e.

. P h i l i p p i nPe o r t sA u t h o r i t yv s C i t yo f l l o i l o ,G . R .N o . 1 0 9 7 9 I ,J u l y 1 4 ,
2003
. S a r m i e n tvosJ u a n G , . RN . o .L - 5 5 6 0 5J;a n u a r2y 8 ,L 9 8 3
. Alarconvs CA,323 SCRA7L6 (2OO\
. T i uvs Mi d d l e to n,310SCRA 581-
. D u l o svs C A ,1 8 8SCRA 413 ( 1990)
. T ro p i caH l o me sInc.vs Villar uz,et. al., G.R.No. L- 4O628, Febr ua r y24,
1989
. F o u n t a i n h e aI dn t e r n a t i o n aPl h i l i p p i n e sI n, c . v s C A , G . R .N o . 8 6 5 0 5 ,
F e b ru a ry 1 ,1 ,,1 991,
. Saguid vs C A ,G.R.No. 150611, June10,2003
. S o nvs S o n ,G.R .No.73077,December 29,1995
. C o rp u zvs C i ti b ank,N.A, et. al./Citibank, NA vs SpousesAzucenaB.
C o r p u za n d R e n a t oS . C o r p u zG , . R .N o . 1 7 5 6 7 7G , . R 'N o . 1 7 7 1 3 3J, u l y
31.,2009

Poge9 of 18
XXVI. Rule19, Intervention
. P a g ta l u n avs G.R.No. 5428t,Mar ch19,1990
n T am ayo,
. Ma g ysa ysa y-Labr ador vs CA,G.R.No.58168,Decem ber L9,L989
. Ord o n e zvs Gu stilo,192SCRA 469
. Me tro p o l i ta n judge,RTCMani l a,
B ankand Tr ustCom panyvs Pr esiding
1_89 SCRA821

XXVIl. Rule20: Calendarof Cases


. A n gK e kC h e nvs Bello,G.R.No. t- JOZqq- q6,
June30, 1988

X X V l l l . R u l e2 1
. U n i ve rsaRl u b b erPr oducts,
Inc.vs CA,130SCRA104( 1984)
. P e o p l evs Mo n tejo,21-SCRA 722 ( 1967)
. Ge n o rg vsa Qu i ntain,78 SCRA 94 ( 1.977)

XXIX. Rule22
. N a cto rvs l A C ,1 -58SCRA
635 ( 1988)
Ma yo rvs l A C ,1 6 1SCRA 63 ( 1988)
. L u zvs N a ti o n aAmnesty
l G.R.No. 159708,September
Com m ission, 24,
2004
. Neypesvs CA,G.R.No. 141,524, September14,2005

XXX. Rule23: DepositionPendingAction

, A . M .N o .0 3 - 1 - 0 9 - S"CR,u l eo n G u i d e l i n et os b e O b s e r v ebdy t h e T r i a C
l ourt
s n dC l e rkso f Cour tin the Conductof Pr e- Tr ial
Ju d g e a and Useof
D e p o si ti o n -d i sco vm ereasu
y r es.

. Kohvs lAC,L44SCRA259 (1986)


. R e p u b l ivs
c S a n diganbayan, 204SCRA 212 ( L991' )
. C a g u i avs 30 SCRA106( 1969)
t T o rre s,
. o a n dD ev' tCor p.vs CA,G.R.No. t03922,July9, 1996
S a n ti a g L
. V d ad e Ma n g u e rrvs Risos, G.R,No. 152643, August28,2008

XXXI. Rule24-28(other modesof discovery)


. a C A ,G.R .No. 1,02390,
L a fra dvs Febr uar I,2002
y
. M ar ch1' 1' ,2002
; No. 1- 51310,
B a n kC o rp .vs DelAlcazarG.R.
S e cu ri ty
. R o se tevs L i m,G.R .No. 13605,June8, 2006

X X X |l . R u l e2 9
. L o p e zvs Ma ce re n9, 5 SCRA753
F o rtu n eC o rp .vs C A,355 SCRA

Page10 of L8

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy