Color and Shade Management in Esthetic Dentistry
Color and Shade Management in Esthetic Dentistry
net/publication/267392049
CITATIONS READS
4 5,229
2 authors, including:
Vineet Agrawal
Manubhai Patel Dental College
24 PUBLICATIONS 87 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Vineet Agrawal on 27 October 2014.
REVIEW ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
The color and appearance of teeth is a complex phenomenon, with many factors such as lighting conditions, translucency,
opacity, light scattering, gloss and the human eye and brain influencing the overall perception of tooth color. To achieve
esthetics, four basic determinants are required in sequence; viz., position, contour, texture and color. The knowledge of
the concept of color is essential for achieving good esthetics. This review compiles the various aspects of color, physics
behind perception of color, measurements and shade matching in dentistry for various esthetic treatments.
KEY WORDS: Chroma, colorimeter, hue, shade matching, shade selection, value
(i.e., rods and cones) in the eye and recognized by the depends on the object’s capacity to modify the color of the
brain as specific color.[7] incident light. Color appears because the material absorbs
the radiating visible light, with the exception of the
wavelength reflected to the viewer’s eyes. A transparent
PRIMARY PREREQUISITE FOR PERCEPTION medium will allow visible light to pass through almost
OF COLOR (COLOR TRIAD) unaltered. Translucent object scatter, transmit and absorb
The primary prerequisites for color perception include portions of wavelengths of visible light, while opaque
three variable elements: The object, a light source for materials do not transmit, but reflect and absorb various
illumination and an observer [Figure 1]. wavelengths of visible light.
most nearly corresponds with the lightness or darkness of in dentistry. Photoelectric tristimulus colorimeters have
the color.[15] Value ranges from white to black. Chroma is the potential to remove some of the shortcomings of
determined next with tabs that are close to the measured the visual method and have been shown to provide accurate
value but are of increasing saturation of color. Chroma and repeatable measurements; however, they are not
ranges from achromatic or gray to a highly saturated error‑proof. In dentistry, the results of a colorimetric device
color. Hue is determined last by matching with color tabs can be altered because the standardized illuminating light
of the “value” and “chroma” already determined. Hue is emitted from the device may be scattered, absorbed,
measured on a scale from 2.5 to 10 in increments of 2.5 transmitted, reflected and even displaced in a sideways
for each of the 10 color families (red, R; yellow‑red, YR; direction as a result of the translucent optical properties
yellow, Y; green‑yellow, GY; green, G; blue‑green, BG; of teeth and dental ceramics.
blue, B; purple‑blue, PB; purple, P; red‑purple, RP).
Visual color determination of a patient’s tooth is the most SHADE TAKING DEVICES
frequently applied method in clinical dentistry. However, Shade guides
visual determination of shade selection has been found to Shade matching tools are called color standards or shade
be unreliable and inconsistent. Visual color assessment is guides. There are different types of color standards
dependent on the observer’s physiologic and psychologic for dentistry, depending on their purpose and the tissue
responses to radiant energy stimulation. Inconsistencies
for which they are intended. Tooth color standards, color
may result from uncontrolled factors such as fatigue,
standards for oral soft‑tissues and color standards for
aging, emotions, lighting conditions, previous eye
facial prostheses‑commonly known as dental, gingival
exposure, object and illuminant position and metamerism.
and facial shade guides, respectively ‑ are possible.
Paravina[16] evaluated a newly developed visual
shade‑matching apparatus, Shademat visual+ (SV+). Clark introduced a custom shade guide in 1931 based on
The SV+ apparatus enabled better shade‑matching visual assessment of human teeth, recorded in Munsell hue,
results than daylight. Correlated color temperature of the
value and chroma. Acknowledging the deficiencies of the
daylight varied from 4500 to 6800 K, while light intensity
available guides, Sproull, in the early 70s, suggested that an
varied from 140 to 1000 lux. In SV+ trials, these values
ideal shade guide should consist of shade (color) tabs that
were constant at the measuring place: 5000 K and 1400
are well distributed and logically arranged in color space,
lux. There is a need for a more scientific and consistent
preferably based on the Munsell color system. Quality
means of shade matching in restorative dentistry.
control issues regarding color mismatches of shade tab and
porcelain batches from the same manufacturer could be
Instrumental technique
as problematic as mismatches among manufacturers. The
In this system, the color space consists of three coordinates:
limitations of shade guides are factors that compromise
L*, a* and b* [Figure 4].[15] The L* refers to the lightness
shade‑matching procedures in dentistry and contribute to the
coordinate and its value ranges from 0 for perfect black to
dissatisfaction of clinicians, technicians and patients. A new
100 for perfect white. The a* and b* are the chromaticity
generation of shade guides has been developed to address
coordinates in the red–green axis and yellow–blue axis,
these deficiencies. Shofu offered the natural color concept
respectively. Positive a* values reflect the red color
(NCC)[17] while Vita introduced a 3‑dimensional shade guide
range and negative values indicate the green color range.
Similarly, positive b* values indicate the yellow color range system (Vita 3D‑Master). The NCC[18] system consists of
while negative values indicate the blue color range. The 208 color blends based on 38 basic shades. The manufacturer
differences in the lightness and chromaticity coordinates purports that these blends are logically arranged in L* a* b*
(ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*) as a result of ultraviolet light exposure are color space according to Munsell hue, chroma and value. In
determined first and the total color change (ΔE*ab) can be addition, the shade guides and veneering material are made
calculated using the relationship. of the same material to avoid the effect of metamerism.
The Vita 3D‑Master shade guide[6] [Figure 5a] features a
∆E* ab = ( ∆L * 2 + ∆a * 2 + ∆b*2 )½ systematic colorimetric distribution of 26 shade tabs within
the tooth color space. The manufacturer purports that this
Instrumental color analysis, on the other hand, offers a shade guide demonstrates an equidistant distribution in
potential advantage over visual color determination because the color space. The shade guide is organized into five
instrumental readings are objective, can be quantified primary value levels, with a secondary distribution based on
and are more rapidly obtained. Spectrophotometers and chroma and hue. These value groups are arranged from the
colorimeters have been used with modifications in an lightest (value level 1) to the darkest (value level 5), left to
attempt to overcome problems with visual shade matching right. Intermediate shades can be achieved based on mixing
formulas. The manufacturer advocates a three‑step process: and the color is confirmed in natural daylight after initial
Value is determined first in making a shade determination selection under incandescent and fluorescent lightening
and then the chroma and hue are determined. The selection • The teeth to be matched should be clean
process is simplified because the number of choices decreases • Shade comparison should be made at the start of the
throughout the procedure. The shade tabs arrangement patient visit
in the Vita classical[6] [Figure 5b] is by hue, whereas in the • Brightly colored clothing should be draped and lipstick
chromascop guides[6] [Figure 5c], the tabs are arranged in five should be removed
clearly discernible value levels. Within each level are tabs that • Shade comparison should be made quickly, with the
represent different chromas and hues. The five levels cover color samples placed under the lip directly next to the
that area of the CIELAB color solid occupied by natural tooth being matched
teeth. The lightest value level has only two chroma steps of a • The eye should be rested by focusing on a gray-blue
single hue and the darkest value level has three chroma steps surface immediately before a comparison since
of one hue. Groups 2, 3 and 4 have three chroma levels of the this balances all the color sensors of the retina and
middle and orange hue and two chroma levels in each hue re‑sensitizes the eye to the yellow color of the tooth.
shift toward yellow or red. The sequence of shade selection is
value, then chroma, followed by hue. Technology based shade matching devices
• Digital cameras
There are certain principles that should be followed during • Spectrophotometers
shade selection.[13,14,19‑21] These are as follows: • Colorimeters.
• Patient should be viewed at the eye level so that the
most color‑sensitive part of the retina will be used Spot measurement (SM) devices measure a small area
• Shade comparison should be made under different lighting on the tooth surface, while complete‑tooth measurement
conditions. Normally, the patient is taken to a window (CTM) devices measure the entire tooth.[1,7] For SM
a b c
a b
d e f
cc
Figure 6: Technological based shade matching devices; (a) Shade
Figure 5: Shade guides; (a) Vitapan 3D master shade guide; (b) Vita scan; (b) Spectro shade; (c) Vita easy shade; (d) Crystal eye;
lumin shade guide; (c) Chromascop shade guide (e) Shade eye NCC; (f) Shade vision
devices, the size or diameter of the optical device aperture These filters act as analog function generators that limit
(generally about 3 mm2) will determine how much of the spectral characteristics of light striking the detector
tooth surface and subsequent shade is measured. Examples surface.[6] The filter colorimeters are considered inferior to
of such SM technologies are the Shofu ShadeEye‑NCC scanning devices like spectrophotometers because of the
chroma meter system and the Vita EasyShade system. CTM inability to match the standard observer functions. However,
systems measure the entire tooth surface and provide a because of their consistent and rapid sensing nature, these
topographical map of the tooth in one image. Measurement devices can be used for quality control.[25‑27] The ShadeEye
of the complete surface gives the operator more consistent NCC chroma meter [Figure 6e] is example of tristimulus
and reproducible information about the tooth structure. colorimeter. The ShadeVision system [Figure 6f] is a
device that combines digital color image technology with
Digital cameras colorimetric filtering technology.
Digital photography, like many of the newer electronic
technologies in the industry, offers significant benefits to
dental practices. The digital camera is extremely efficient THREE STEP SHADE MATCHING
and easy to use. Instead of focusing light on the film to PROCEDURES
create a chemical reaction, digital cameras capture images First lightness, then chroma and then hue should be
using charged coupled devices, which contain millions matched. It is the same order as for Clark’s, Hayashi’s and
of microscopically small light‑sensitive elements.[22] The Hall’s shade guides as well as in vitapan 3D master.
advantage of this method is that the camera records each of
the three colors at each pixel location. ShadeScan [Figure 6a] What is actually needed is to reduce the number of
combine digital color analysis with colorimetric analysis, potentially adequate tabs to between 2 and 4 as quickly
but SpectroShade [Figure 6b] is the only one that combines as possible, by choosing tabs from the same or different
digital color imaging with spectrophotometric analysis. groups.
8. Chu SJ. Precision shade technology: Contemporary strategies in shade 19. Christopher CK. Shade selection. Aust Dent Pract 2007;10:116‑9.
selection. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2002;14:79‑83;84. 20. Dagg H, O'Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C. The influence of
9. Westland S. Review of the CIE system of colorimetry and its use in some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil
dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15 Suppl 1:S5‑12. 2004;31:900‑4.
10. Terry DA, Geller W, Tric O, Anderson MJ, Tourville M, Kobashigawa A. 21. Park JH, Lee YK, Lim BS. Influence of illuminants on the color
Anatomical form defines color: Function, form, and aesthetics. Pract distribution of shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:402‑11.
Proced Aesthet Dent 2002;14:59‑67. 22. Cal E, Sonugelen M, Guneri P, Kesercioglu A, Kose T. Application of
11. Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: The science and a digital technique in evaluating the reliability of shade guides. J Oral
strategies. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:467‑79. Rehabil 2004;31:483‑91.
12. Boksman L. Shade selection; accuracy and reproducibility. Ont Dent 23. Da Silva JD, Park SE, Weber HP, Ishikawa‑Nagai S. Clinical
2007;32:24‑7. performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth
13. Capa N, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Calikkocaoglu S. Evaluating color reproduction. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:361‑8.
factors that affect the shade‑matching ability of dentists, dental staff 24. Trushkowsky RD. How a spectrophotometer can help you achieve
members and laypeople. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:71‑6. esthetic shade matching. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:60‑6.
14. Denissen H, Dozic A. Photometric assessment of tooth color using 25. Tung FF, Goldstein GR, Jang S, Hittelman E. The repeatability of an
commonly available software. Eur J Esthet Dent 2010;5:204‑15. intraoral dental colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:585‑90.
15. Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual and instrumental 26. Yap AU, Sim CP, Loh WL, Teo JH. Human‑eye versus computerized
agreement in dental shade selection: Three distinct observer populations color matching. Oper Dent 1999;24:358‑63.
and shade matching protocols. Dent Mater 2009;25:276‑81. 27. Swift EJ Jr, Hammel SA, Lund PS. Colorimetric evaluation of vita
16. Paravina RD. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade‑matching shade resin composites. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:356‑61.
apparatus. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:528‑34.
17. Yuan JC, Brewer JD, Monaco EA Jr, Davis EL. Defining a natural tooth
color space based on a 3‑dimensional shade system. J Prosthet Dent How to cite this article: Agrawal VS, Kapoor S. Color and shade manage-
2007;98:110‑9. ment in esthetic dentistry. Univ Res J Dent 2013;3:120-7.
18. Egger B. Natural color concept; a systematic approach to visual shade Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared
selection. Quintessence Dent Technol 2003;26:161‑70.