Naturalistic Intervention Complete10 2010
Naturalistic Intervention Complete10 2010
Evidence
Naturalistic intervention meets the evidence-base criteria with eight single-subject and two
randomized group design studies, demonstrating its effectiveness for promoting communication
and social skills for learners at the preschool, elementary school, and middle/high school levels.
Naturalistic intervention can be used effectively with learners with ASD regardless of cognitive
level and/or expressive language skills. The evidence base shows that naturalistic intervention
is effective for learners at the preschool, elementary school, and middle/high school levels.
The evidence base demonstrates that naturalistic intervention can be used to facilitate
communication and social skills, which may include things like expressive vocabulary, speech
intelligibility, use of gesture, shared attention, and turn-taking.
Evidence Base
The studies cited in this section provide the basis upon which this practice was determined to
meet the NPDC on ASD’s criteria as an evidence-based practice. This list is not exhaustive and
other quality studies may exist but were not found in our search.
Preschool
Ingersoll, B., Lewis, E., & Kroman, E. (2007). Teaching the imitation and spontaneous use of
descriptive gestures in young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral
intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1446-1456.
Naturalistic Intervention: Overview Page 1 of 3
National Professional Development Center on ASD
10/2010
National Professional Development Center on
Autism Spectrum Disorders
McGee, G. G., Almeida, M. C., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Feldman, R. S. (1992). Promoting
reciprocal teaching via peer incidental teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,
25, 117-126.
Yoder, P., & Stone, W. L. (2006). A randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic
communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in
preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 698-
711.
Elementary
Charlop, M. H., Schreibman, L., & Thibodeau, M. G. (1985). Increasing spontaneous verbal
responding in autistic children using a time delay procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 18(2), 155-166.
Charlop, M. H., & Walsh, M. E. (1986). Increasing autistic children’s spontaneous verbalizations
of affection: An assessment of time delay and peer modeling procedures. Journal of
Applied Behavior Analysis, 19(3), 307-314.
Charlop, M. H., & Trasowech, J. E. (1991). Increasing autistic children’s daily spontaneous
speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(4), 747-761.
Koegel, R. L., Camarata, S., Koegel, L. K., Ben-Tall, A., & Smith, A. E. (1998). Increasing
speech intelligibility in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 28(3), 241-251.
Laski, K. E., Charlop, M. H., & Schreibman, L. (1988). Training parents to use the natural
language paradigm to increase their autistic children’s speech. Journal of Applied
Behavior Analysis, 2(4), 391-400.
McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental
teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,
18, 17-31.
Middle/High
Hamilton, B. L., & Snell, M. E. (1993). Using the milieu approach to increase spontaneous
communication book use across environments by an adolescent with autism.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 259-272.
Hancock, T. B., & Kaiser, A. P. (2002). The effects of trainer-implemented enhanced milieu
intervention on the social communication of children with autism. Topics in Early
Childhood Special Education, 22(1), 39-54.
Hanock, T. B. & Kaiser, A. P. (2006). Enhanced milieu teaching. In McCauley R. J. & Fey,
M. E. (Ed.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 203-229). Baltimore:
Paul H. Brooks Publishing.
Hwang, B., & Hughes, C. (2000). The effects of social interactive training on early social
communicative skills of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 30(4), 331-343.
Ingenmey, R., & Van Houten, R. (1991). Using time delay to promote spontaneous speech in an
autistic child. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 591-596.
Kaiser, A. P., Hancock, T. B., & Nietfeld, J. P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented
enhanced milieu intervention on the social communication of children who have autism.
Early Education and Development, 11(4), 423-446.
Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language intervention paradigm
for nonverbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17 (2),
187-200.
Matson, J. L., Sevin, J. A., Box, M. L., & Francis, K. L. (1993). An evaluation of two methods for
increasing self-initiated verbalizations in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 26(3), 389-398.
Neef, N. A., Walters, J., & Egel, A. L. (1984). Establishing generative yes/no response in
developmentally disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17(4), 453-460.
Wong, C. S., Kasari, C., Freeman, S., & Paparella, T.. (2007).The acquisition and generalization
of joint attention and symbolic play skills in young children with autism. Research and
Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(2), 101-109.
High quality randomized or quasi experimental design studies do not have critical design flaws
that create confounds to the studies, and design features allow readers/consumers to rule out
competing hypotheses for study findings. High quality in single subject design studies is
reflected by a) the absence of critical design flaws that create confounds and b) the
demonstration of experimental control at least three times in each study.
Horner, R., Carr, E., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single
subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional
Children, 71, 165-180.
Nathan, P., & Gorman, J. M. (2002). A guide to treatments that work. NY: Oxford
University Press.
Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. D., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. (2004).
Quality indicators for research in special education and guidelines for evidence-based
practices: Executive summary. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children Division
for Research.
Rogers, S. J., & Vismara, L. A. (2008). Evidence-based comprehensive treatments for early
autism. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 8-38.
Using these criteria, the empirical studies that follow provided documentation for supporting
Naturalistic Strategies as an evidence-based practice. This list is not exhaustive; other quality
studies may exists that were not included.
Ingersoll, B., Lewis, E., & Kroman, E. (2007). Teaching the imitation and spontaneous use of
descriptive gestures in young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral
intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1446-1456.
Koegel, R. L., Camarata, S., Koegel, L. K., Ben-Tall, A., & Smith, A. E. (1998). Increasing
speech intelligibility in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 28(3), 241-251.
McGee, G. G., Almeida, M. C., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Feldman, R. S. (1992). Promoting
reciprocal teaching via peer incidental teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,
25, 117-126.
Yoder, P., & Stone, W. L. (2006). A randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic
communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in
preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 698-
711.
Elementary
Charlop, M. H., Schreibman, L., & Thibodeau, M. G. (1985). Increasing spontaneous verbal
responding in autistic children using a time delay procedure. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 18(2), 155-166.
Charlop, M. H., & Walsh, M. E. (1986). Increasing autistic children’s spontaneous verbalizations
of affection: An assessment of time delay and peer modeling procedures. Journal of
Applied Behavior Analysis, 19(3), 307-314.
Charlop, M. H., & Trasowech, J. E. (1991). Increasing autistic children’s daily spontaneous
speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(4), 747-761.
Koegel, R. L., Camarata, S., Koegel, L. K., Ben-Tall, A., & Smith, A. E. (1998). Increasing
speech intelligibility in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 28(3), 241-251.
Laski, K. E., Charlop, M. H., & Schreibman, L. (1988). Training parents to use the natural
language paradigm to increase their autistic children’s speech. Journal of Applied
Behavior Analysis, 2(4), 391-400.
McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental
teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,
18, 17-31.
Middle/High
Hamilton, B. L., & Snell, M. E. (1993). Using the milieu approach to increase spontaneous
communication book use across environments by an adolescent with autism.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 259-272.
b. social skills.
With naturalistic intervention, it is important to identify specific skills that will be targeted
(i.e., target behaviors). These skills, or target behaviors, need to be more specific than a
general goal.
General Goal: Connor will increase his use of language during play.
Target Behavior: Connor will use the pronouns he, she, and it correctly.
2. Practitioners, parents, and other team members confirm that target behaviors are
reflected in the learner‟s IEP or IFSP.
Because naturalistic intervention is often used with very young children, it is important to
recognize and understand the value of prelinguistic communication. For example, a
target behavior may be pointing to an object to establish shared attention, engaging in
shared attention, or vocal turn-taking. Although none of these target behaviors
demonstrates actual language use, these skills provide the foundation for language
development. For video clips demonstrating shared attention and other preliguistic
behaviors, see the ASD Video Glossary at
http://www.autismspeaks.org/video/glossary.php.
2. Practitioners, parents, and other team members take data on the target skill a
minimum of three times in more than one environment.
Language sampling can provide useful information about learners who are using
words and/or phrases regularly. It is a direct transcription of an interaction between
learners and their teacher, practitioner, or team members. A language sample will
provide information on the current length and content of utterances as well as
antecedents to their production. A speech/language pathologist on the learner‟s team
should be able to take and analyze a language sample (see additional resources).
Naturalistic intervention should take place throughout the day in the context of daily
routines/ schedules. Table 1 provides an example of naturalistic interventions used to
increase target behaviors throughout a preschooler‟s day at school and at home. The
art of embedding intervention within the learner‟s regular routines is critical for
successfully implementing naturalistic intervention.
1. Practitioners, parents, and other team members determine the learner‟s daily
schedule.
1. Practitioners, parents, and other team members determine who will teach the
skill.
Because naturalistic intervention occurs throughout the day, many adults may need to
be taught how to elicit the target behavior. These adults may include parents,
caregivers, related service providers, paraprofessionals, classroom teachers, or
classroom volunteers. Having multiple adults interact with learners encourages
generalization. Adults who naturally interact with learners should be prepared to use
naturalistic intervention strategies to elicit target skills.
Depending on the situation, different levels of training may be necessary. For example,
in a preschool classroom, the classroom teacher may need to arrange the environment
and to model the strategies used to elicit the skill for assistants and volunteers. For
older learners in multiple classrooms throughout the day, individual classroom teachers
must understand the entire process to successfully embed naturalistic strategies in their
classrooms. Regular consultation with a case manager and/or professional
development may be required to achieve consistency and success in implementing
naturalistic intervention throughout the day when multiple teachers and settings are
involved.
Although some naturalistic practices, such as milieu teaching, have traditionally been
implemented by practitioners, parents, and other team members, research has also
In Step 5, practitioners, parents, and other team members use information from Step 4
and materials/resources within learning environments to capture learners‟ attention
and motivate them to produce target behaviors.
A key feature of naturalistic intervention is using materials and toys that will
motivate the learner to engage in the target behavior and that will promote
generalization of skills. Toys that can be particularly useful in facilitating
communication and social play include those that:
Have multiple parts (e.g., LegosTM, a shape sorter, or Mr. Potato HeadTM),
Are added onto another activity (e.g., adding Little PeopleTM into play with blocks,
using puppets to behavior out a reading lesson),
Require adult assistance (e.g., having lid on bottle of bubbles so tight that learner
must request help, holding puzzle pieces until the child requests them), and/or
Encourage turn-taking (e.g., throwing a ball, placing puzzle pieces, sending toy
cars down a ramp).
2. Practitioners, parents, and other team members manage and distribute teaching
materials in a way that encourages learners to communicate.
3. Practitioners, parents, and other team members arrange the intervention context
and environment to:
Ruby‟s team has identified her target behavior to be increased turn taking.
She enjoys manipulatives. Her teacher replaces the standard manipulatives
(e.g., counting bears) with turn-taking games that involve the manipulation
of small parts, like Ants in the PantsTM, StacrobatsTM, and KerplunkTM. The
intention is for Ruby to be enticed by the small pieces and then engage in
turn-taking while playing the game.
In Step 6, the teacher, practitioner, or team member elicits the target behavior using
interaction techniques and, if necessary, behavioral strategies like prompting and
modeling.
In Step 6a, the teacher, practitioner, or team member engages the learner in a
language-rich and learner-centered interaction in which the teacher, practitioner, or
team member is highly attuned and responsive to the communicative attempts of the
learner.
a. Following the learner‟s lead. Following the learner‟s lead involves allowing the
learner to direct the interaction and the activity. Rather than a teacher,
practitioner, or team member having a set lesson plan (e.g., to play in the toy
house), she waits and sees what the learner wants to do. If the learner goes
to the toy house, she engages him there. But if the learner goes to the block
area, she engages him with the blocks. Remember that the environment has
already been arranged to elicit specific targets (Step 5), so either activity
should lead to the desired target.For some learners, the teacher, practitioner,
or team member must be especially observant and patient in order to follow
the learner‟s lead. If a learner has a more passive temperament, it may be
difficult to identify his interests, and the teacher, practitioner, or team member
may be tempted to become more directive (“Here‟s a puzzle! Let‟s do it!”).
However, teacher, practitioner, or team members are encouraged to be
patient, watch for nonverbal indications of interest (e.g., eye gaze, reaching),
and match the learner‟s activity level (e.g., if the learner is pouring sand over
and over, join her in this activity rather than encouraging her to make a
sandcastle).
b. Being at the learner‟s level. With very young learners, the teacher,
practitioner, or team member may have to lie or sit on the floor while the child
is on a chair or couch to share face-to-face interactions. This kind of
positioning facilitates shared attention, which is crucial to the interactions.
For learners who avoid eye contact, it may be necessary for the teacher,
practitioner, or team member to maneuver her own body to interrupt the
Both verbal and motor imitation can engage learners. If a learner holds a
puzzle piece up to her face and says, “ga,” the teacher, practitioner, or team
member can hold a puzzle piece up to his own mouth and say, “ga.” This
imitation can encourage turn-taking and facilitate the back-and-forth dance of
social communication.
Interrupting a routine with a pause or doing something that the learner finds
funny or interesting can engage learners. For example, make a funny face as
you reveal yourself after a few rounds of peek-a-boo or pause at the end of a
line of a song (“The itsy bitsy spider went up the water…..”).
For most children with ASD, it will be necessary to provide supports for learners to
demonstrate the target behaviors. Strategies Based on Applied Behavior Analysis
(ABA) to elicit targeted behaviors are outlined in Step 6b, below.
Step 6b. Using Strategies Based on Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) to Elicit
Target Behaviors
In Step 6b, the teacher, practitioner, or team member uses modeling, mand-models,
time delay, and/or incidental teaching techniques to elicit the target behavior within
intervention contexts and arranged environments that were identified in Steps 4 and 5.
1. Practitioners, parents, and other team members select one of the following
interventions to elicit the target behavior:
a. modeling,
b. mand-modeling,
d. incidental teaching.
Modeling
c. Expanding the response and providing the requested material (if the learner
responds to the model correctly),
d. Providing another model (if the learner does not respond or is inaccurate),
e. Expanding the response and providing the requested material (if the learner
responds to the model correctly), and
f. Stating the correct response and providing the material (if the learner does
not respond or does not repeat the model correctly).
The following table illustrates how modeling can be used to teach a learner with ASD to
use two-word utterances to make a request. Notice how the interaction is brief, with the
learner being given two or three models, and that it ends positively, with the learner
obtaining the desired material.
Steps Example
a. Establish shared attention Caleb and his childcare provider are playing with
play dough.
b. Provide a verbal model The childcare provider prompts Caleb, “Say, „More
play dough‟.”
c. If the learner responds to the If Caleb says, “More play dough,” the childcare
model correctly, expand the provider gives him more play dough and expands his
response and provide the utterance, “More green play dough, please!”
requested material.
d. If the learner does not respond or If Caleb says, “More,” the childcare provider prompts
does not repeat the model exactly, him by saying, “Say, „More play dough‟.” She
provide another model. stresses „play dough‟.
e. If the learner responds to the If Caleb says, “More play dough,” the childcare
model correctly, expand the provider gives him more and expands his utterance
response and provide the by saying, “More green play dough, please!”
requested material.
f. If the learner does not respond or If Caleb does not respond or only responds partially
does not repeat the model (e.g., “More”), the childcare provider says, “More play
correctly, provide material and dough” and gives Caleb the play dough.
state the correct response.
(Adapted from Hancock & Kaiser, 2006)
Mand-Modeling
c. Expanding the response and providing the requested material (if the learner
responds correctly);
e. Expanding on the response and providing the requested material (if the
learner gives the target response); and
f. Saying the target response and providing the material (if learner still does not
give the target response or repeat the model exactly).
Table 4 illustrates how mand-modeling can be used to teach a learner with ASD how to
use two-word utterances.
Steps Example
a. Establish shared attention Sasha and her mother are having snack at the
table where enticing snacks are located.
b. Provide a verbal direction (mand) or Her mother says, “Tell me what you want,
question Sasha” or gives a choice question, “Do you
want apples or crackers?”
c. If the learner responds correctly, When Sasha says the target response (i.e.,
expand the response and provide the “Want crackers”), her mother provides the
requested material. crackers and expands her utterance by saying,
“Want fish crackers, please!”
d. If the learner does not respond or does When Sasha points to the crackers instead of
not respond with a target, provide verbalizing, her mother prompts her by saying,
another direction or model (depending “Say, „Want crackers‟.”
on the learner‟s needs for support).
e. If the learner gives the target response, When Sasha repeats, “Want crackers,” her
expand the response and provide the mother provides the crackers and expands,
requested material. “Want fish crackers, please!”
f. If the learner still does not give the When Sasha says, “Crackers,” which is not
The use of modified time delay, or waiting, before providing a verbal prompt allows
learners to initiate the verbalization and encourages them to become aware of
nonverbal cues.
Practitioners, parents, and other team members implement modified time delay by:
d. Providing a mand or model, depending on the learner‟s need for support (if
the learner does not initiate at the target level;
e. Expanding on the response and providing the material (if the learner
responds correctly);
f. Saying the target response and providing the material (if the learner still does
not give the target response or repeat the model exactly).
The following table illustrates how modified time delay can be used to teach a learner
with ASD how to use two-word utterances to request.
Steps Example
a. Establish shared attention John‟s teacher is pushing John on the swing,
facing him.
b. Wait for the learner to make a request The teacher lets the swing come to a stop. She
waits, with her hands up as if to push, and has an
expectant look on her face.
c. If the learner initiates a request/ If John says, “Push me!” the teacher says, “Push
comment at the target level, expand me really high!” and pushes the swing.
the response and provide the request.
d. If the learner does not initiate at the If John grunts instead of verbalizing, the teacher
Incidental Teaching
Incidental teaching can be used to help learners elaborate on requests they have made.
The teacher, practitioner, or team member encourages the learner to initiate interactions
and manipulates the environment to elicit a request, and then uses a question to
encourage an elaboration from the learner.
Practitioners, parents, and other team members implement incidental teaching by:
c. Responding with a request for elaboration (if the learner does not initiate with
the target response),
The following table illustrates how incidental teaching can be used to teach a learner
with ASD how to use modifiers when making requests.
Steps Example
a. Set up the environment to encourage Ming‟s teacher knows she likes to play a fishing
learners to request assistance or game. She places the game on the table, but
materials does not put out the fishing pole.
b. Wait for learners to initiate the request Ming looks at her teacher and says, “Pole.”
c. If the learner initiates with the target Her teacher asks, “What kind of pole?” If Ming
response, respond with a request for replies, “Fishing pole,” her teacher can say,
elaboration. “That‟s right!” and provide her with the fishing
pole. If Ming still replies, “Pole,” then her teacher
may prompt again for the elaboration.
d. Continue to prompt (varying the level If Ming still replies, “Pole,” then her teacher may
of prompting as needed) for the prompt again for the elaboration: “Tell me what
elaboration until the learner responds kind of pole, Ming.”
appropriately.
e. If the learner does not initiate a If Ming points at the pole or says, “Pole,” her
request with the target behavior, use teacher can respond with the procedure that is
model, mand-model, or modified time most appropriate for Ming. In this example, her
delay procedures, depending on the teacher provides a model, “Say fishing pole.”
needs of the learner.
(Adapted from Hancock & Kaiser, 2006)
The strategies described in the above section also can be used with prelinguistic
learners, with some modifications. Instead of expanding on a verbal response, the
communication partner would map language onto the target behavior. This can be used
to pair language with any communicative attempt. If a learner points to a picture on the
mantel (request for information), her mother can say, “That‟s Grandma!” If a child
pushes away her plate of noodles (protest), her father can say, “Oh! I don‟t want
spaghetti,” and remove her plate. One way to think of pairing an adult‟s words with a
child‟s intent is to say it “as your child would if he could” (Sussman, 1999, p. 208).
Table 1 provides a thorough example on how all these strategies might be used
throughout a preschooler‟s day to elicit the target behavior.
Step 7. Using Data Collection to Monitor Learner Progress and Determine Next
Steps
1. Practitioners, parents, and other team members collect data to evaluate the
success of the intervention and to guide future decision-making.
The example below shows how data could be gathered on the intervention, including
routines in which the intervention was embedded, environmental modifications, and
strategies that were used to elicit the target behavior.
Learner: Jason
Person collecting data: Ms. C
Target Behavior (TB): Using words to ask for more
Date Activity/Routine Environmental Strategies Used TB Notes
Modifications (underline or circle) used
Yes/
No
4-9 Snack Snacks out of M Ma TD IT O N Off day? Had to
reach. Choices = M Ma TD IT O Y provide model for
chips, goldfish, M Ma TD IT O Y him to request
apple, juice box, M Ma TD IT O N more
raisins M Ma TD IT O Y
4-10 Snack Same M Ma TD IT O N Only ate chips
M Ma TD IT O Y today
M Ma TD IT O Y
M Ma TD IT O N
M Ma TD IT O Y
4-11 Free Choice – I held the bin of M Ma TD IT O Keesha playing
Y
Pirate Legos Legos and only M Ma TD IT O N with us at same
gave three blocks M Ma TD IT O Y time – each
at a time when M Ma TD IT O Y building their
asked M Ma TD IT O Y own thing
M = Model, Ma = Mand-Model, TD = Modified Time Delay, IT = Incidental Teaching, O = Other
Wrapping paper around one‟s wrist on which data can be tallied, allowing adults
to move around the teaching space without having to carry data collection
sheets.
Placing data collection sheets around the teaching space so that they are
available regardless of where the learner goes.
Gathering data from multiple students on address labels that can later be peeled
off and put on individual students‟ data sheets. Practitioners, parents, and other
team members will avoid having to shuffle through multiple data sheets as they
interact with a classroom of students.
References
Hancock, T. B., & Kaiser, A. P. (2006). Enhanced milieu teaching. In McCauley R.J. & Fey,
M.E. (Ed.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 203-229). Baltimore: Paul
H. Brooks Publishing.
Sussman, F. (1999). More than words: Helping parents promote communication and social skills
in children with autism spectrum disorder. Toronto, ON: The Hanen Centre.
Daily Goals
Activity/
Routine Goal 1. Using 2-3 word utterances to request Goal 2. Labeling body parts
Coat Hook Activity: Adults can forget to bring necessary items (shoes Activity: Removing coat, etc in the morning.
Routine to replace his boots) to assist student.
Intervention: Use mands (commands/prompts) and time delay to elicit
Intervention: Use modified time delay and mands to labels for body parts associated with clothing items.
encourage request. Adult asks, “Are these your hands or feet?” as Brian removes
Wait (modified time delay) to see if Brian requests his mittens. Brian responds, “Hands.”
his shoes independently. Adult comments, “I see your ____,” as Brian removes his
If not, provide a mand: “Tell me what you need, boots. Brian responds, “Feet.”
Brian,” in order to prompt for the response: “my
shoes.”
Circle Activity: Include “requests” into daily classroom Activity: Include songs involving body parts in the class‟s repertoire.
Time assignments during circle time.
Intervention: Use modified time delay to encourage Brian to fill in the
Intervention: Provide models to encourage Brian to use a missing word during your pause
two-word utterance to make these requests. During the Hokey Pokey, use time delay and encourage Brian
Encourage the daily “weather person” to ask a to fill in the missing word during your pause. Adult sings,
friend to walk with them to the window by “You put your ____” (and places arm out) and calls on Brian.
requesting, “Help me, please.” Brian responds, “Arm in!”
Letting the “friend counter” request a specific
pointer for counting, “Red pointer, please”. Activity: Dress a toy bear as part of the daily weather report.
Daily
Activity/ Goals
Routine
Goal 1. Using 2-3 word utterances to request Goal 2. Labeling body parts
Morning Activity: Offered choices at snack time are kept out of reach Activity: The group talks about body parts that are used for
Snack but in sight. eating.
Intervention: Adult uses mand to elicit request. Models two- Intervention: Adult uses modified time delay to encourage Brian
word utterances when response is a single word utterance. to fill in to appropriate body part.
Modified time delay is used to elicit request for more. Adult: “Brian, for chewing I use my ____.” Brian
Adult says, “Tell me what you want.” If Brian replies responds, “Teeth!”
with a single word (“cookie”), adult models two-word If Brian does not respond with the target, use a question
utterance: Say chocolate cookie.” paired with the visual example of chewing: “Brian, what
Adult gives only a small serving of requested snack am I chewing with?”
(e.g., two goldfish crackers). Wait for Brian to request
more. Model the two-word phrase if he uses a single
word to request: “Say more please.”
Free Activity: Favorite toys are placed out of reach, but in sight. Activity: Dolls are available in the “Doctor‟s Office” pretend play
Choice area.
Intervention: Adult waits for Brian to make a request (time
delay). If Brian uses a single word or gesture, adult provides a Intervention: Adult uses mands in order to prompt Brian to label
model. body parts as he fixes the doll‟s injuries.
Brian says, “Trains!” Adult responds, “You want the Brian is placing a band-aid on the doll‟s belly. Adult asks,
trains! Say want trains!” “Brian, tell me where you‟re putting the band aid.” Brian
looks at doll and responds, “Belly.”
Activity: Certain activities require a partner.
Intervention: Adult asks Brian what kind of milk he wants and Intervention: Adults uses a mands to have Brian label body parts
uses incidental teaching to expand the request. while he cleans up.
Brian says, “Milk please.” Adult responds, “What kind As Brian wipes his mouth and hands, adult says, “Brian,
of milk?” Brian responds, “Chocolate milk please!” tell me what you‟re wiping.” Brian responds with the
appropriate label.
Outside Activity: Sand toys are withheld until verbally requested. Activity: Pouring sand on Brian‟s arms, hands, and legs in the
Play sandbox: a familiar and enjoyed activity.
Intervention: Adult holds sand toys out with an expectant look
on her face and waits for Brian to request. Intervention: Adult uses mands (command/prompt) to have Brian
Brian says, “Please.” Adult models the two word label body parts.
phrase, “Say digger please.” Brian responds Brian sticks his hand out, toward the pouring sand. Adult
appropriately. says, “Tell me where to pour it, Brian.” Brian responds,
“My hand!” They do the same for legs and arms.
At Home: Activity: Play with bikes, scooters, sports equipment, all of Activity: Tracing Brian‟s body on the driveway with chalk
Driveway which are hung out of reach
Play Intervention: Adult asks choice questions to elicit the labels.
Intervention: Adult uses mand-model to elicit the request. As the adult and Brian color in the outline, the adult can
Adult says, “Tell me what you want, Brian.” Adult ask, “What are you drawing now, Brian, your eyes or your
pauses, allowing Brian to respond, “My bike!” nose?” Brian responds, “My eyes!”
If Brian responds with a single word or a gesture,
adult provides a model, “Say my bike please!”
At Home: Activity: Playing with foam soap. Adult squeezes a small Activity: Washing up during the bath
Bath Time amount onto Brian‟s hands when requested.
Intervention: As Brian washes different body parts, adult asks for
Intervention: Adult uses modified time delay to elicit the the label and waits for Brian‟s response.
request. Brian uses the washcloth on his leg. Adult asks, “What
Adult waits expectantly while Brian plays with the are you washing?” Brian looks at himself and responds,
foam soap. When it is gone, adult holds up the “Leg!”
container and waits for him to request, “More please!”
Franzone, E. (2009). Implementation checklist for naturalistic intervention. Madison, WI: The
National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders, Waisman
Center, The University of Wisconsin.
Instructions: The Implementation Checklist includes each step in the process of implementing naturalistic
intervention. Please complete all of the requested information including the site and state, individual being
observed/interviewed, and the learner’s initials. To assure that a practice is being implemented as
intended, an observation is always preferable. This may not always be possible. Thus, items may be
scored based on observations with the implementer, discussions and/or record review as appropriate.
Within the table, record a 2 (implemented), 1 (partially implemented), 0 (did not implement), or NA (not
applicable) next to each step observed to indicate to what extent the step was implemented/addressed
during your observation. Use the last page of the checklist to record the target skill, your comments,
whether others were present, and plans for next steps for each observation.
**Scoring Key: 2 = implemented; 1 = partially implemented; 0 = did not implement; NA = not applicable
Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Date
Observer’s Initials
Step 3. Identifying the Contexts for Score**
Intervention
1. Determine the learner’s daily schedule.
2. Identify the contexts in which naturalistic
intervention will be embedded, including
a. learner-directed activities,
b. routine activities, and/or
c. planned activities.
**Scoring Key: 2 = implemented; 1 = partially implemented; 0 = did not implement; NA = not applicable
Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Date
Observer’s Initials
Intervention (Step 6)
Step 6. Eliciting the Target Act
Step 6A. Engaging the Learner in an
Interaction Score**
1. Engage the learner in language-rich, learner-
directed, and reciprocal interactions that
involve the following techniques:
a. following the learner’s lead,
Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Date
Observer’s Initials
Step 6B. Using Strategies Based on Score**
ABA to Elicit Target Behaviors (cont.)
Mand-Modeling
3. Implement mand-modeling by:
Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Date
Observer’s Initials
Step 6B. Using Strategies Based on Score**
ABA to Elicit Target Behaviors (cont.)
Incidental Teaching
1. Implement incidental teaching by:
**Scoring Key: 2 = implemented; 1 = partially implemented; 0 = did not implement; NA = not applicable
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O
M Ma TD IT O