DADAISM
DADAISM
A17 GED108
Dada was an artistic and literary movement that began in Zürich, Switzerland. It arose as
a reaction to World War I and the nationalism that many thought had led to the war.
Influenced by other avant-garde movements - Cubism, Futurism, Constructivism, and
Expressionism - its output was wildly diverse, ranging from performance art to poetry,
photography, sculpture, painting, and collage. Dada's aesthetic, marked by its mockery
of materialistic and nationalistic attitudes, proved a powerful influence on artists in many
cities, including Berlin, Hanover, Paris, New York, and Cologne, all of which generated
their own groups. The movement dissipated with the establishment of Surrealism, but the
ideas it gave rise to have become the cornerstones of various categories of modern and
contemporary art.
The artists in Zürich published a Dada magazine and held art exhibits that helped spread
their anti-war, anti-art message. In 1917, after Ball left for Bern to pursue journalism,
Tzara founded Galerie Dada on Bahnhofstrasse where further Dada evenings were held
along with art exhibits. Tzara became the leader of the movement and began an
unrelenting campaign to spread Dada ideas, showering French and Italian writers and
artists with letters. The group published an art and literature review entitled Dada starting
in July 1917 with five editions
from Zürich and two final ones
from Paris. Their art was
focused on performance and
printed matter.
Once the war ended in 1918,
many of the artists returned to
their home countries, helping to
further spread the movement.
The end of Dada in Zürich
followed the Dada 4-5 event in
April 1919 that by design
turned into a riot, something
that Tzara thought furthered
the aims of Dada by undermining conventional art practices through audience
involvement in art production. The riot, which began as a Dada event, was one of the
most significant. It attracted over 1000 people and began with a conservative speech
about the value of abstract art that was meant to anger the crowd. This was followed by
discordant music and then several readings that encouraged crowd participation until the
crowd lost control and began to destroy several of the props. Tzara described it thus: "the
tumult is unchained hurricane frenzy siren whistles bombardment song the battle starts
out sharply, half the audience applaud the protestors hold the hall . . . chairs pulled out
projectiles crash bang expected effect atrocious and instinctive . . . Dada has succeeded
in establishing the circuit of absolute unconsciousness in the audience which forgot the
frontiers of education of prejudices, experienced the commotion of the New. Final victory
of Dada." For Tzara the key to the success of a riot was audience involvement so that
attendees were not just onlookers of art but became involved in its production. This was
a total negation of traditional art.
Soon after this, Tzara traveled to Paris, where he met André Breton and began
formulating the theories that Breton would eventually call Surrealism. Dadaists did not
self-consciously declare micro-regional movements; the spread of Dada throughout
various European cities and into New York can be attributed to a few key artists, and each
city in turn influenced the aesthetics of their respective Dada groups.
Irreverence was a crucial component of Dada art, whether it was a lack of respect for
bourgeois convention, government authorities, conventional production methods, or the
artistic canon. Each group varied slightly in their focus, with the Berlin group being the
most anti-government and the New York group being the most anti-art. Of all the groups,
the Hannover group was likely the most conservative.
A readymade was simply an object that already existed and was commandeered by Dada
artists as a work of art, often in the process combined with another readymade, as in
Duchamp's Bicycle Wheel, thus creating an assemblage. The pieces were often chosen
and assembled by chance or accident to challenge bourgeois notions about art and
artistic creativity. Indeed, it is difficult to separate conceptually the Dada interest in chance
with their focus on ready-mades and assemblage. Several of the ready-mades and
assemblages were bizarre, a quality that made it easy for the group to merge eventually
with Surrealism. Other artists who worked with ready-mades and assemblages include
Ernst, Man Ray, and Hausmann.
Chance was a key concept underpinning most of Dada art from the abstract and beautiful
compositions of Schwitters to the large assemblages of Duchamp. Chance was used to
embrace the random and the accidental as a way to release creativity from rational control,
with Arp being one of the earliest and best-known practitioners. Schwitters, for example,
gathered random bits of detritus from a variety of locales, while Duchamp welcomed
accidents such as the crack that occurred while he was making The Large Glass. In
addition to loss of rational control, Dada lack of concern with preparatory work and the
embrace of artworks that were marred fit well with the Dada irreverence for traditional art
methods.
Tied closely to Dada irreverence was their interest in humor, typically in the form of irony.
In fact, the embrace of the readymade is key to Dada's use of irony as it shows an
awareness that nothing has intrinsic value. Irony also gave the artists flexibility and
expressed their embrace of the craziness of the world thus preventing them from taking
their work too seriously or from getting caught up in excessive enthusiasm or dreams of
utopia. Their humor is an unequivocal YES to everything as art.