100% found this document useful (1 vote)
512 views1 page

Individual Project Presentation Rubric

The document provides a rubric for evaluating individual presentations. It assesses presentations based on 5 categories - visual appearance, content knowledge, and quality of presentation. For each category, it provides criteria for scoring presentations at different levels from 1-5 points. A score of 1 is the lowest, indicating weaknesses. A score of 5 is the highest, denoting excellent visuals, strong content knowledge, and high quality presentation skills.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
512 views1 page

Individual Project Presentation Rubric

The document provides a rubric for evaluating individual presentations. It assesses presentations based on 5 categories - visual appearance, content knowledge, and quality of presentation. For each category, it provides criteria for scoring presentations at different levels from 1-5 points. A score of 1 is the lowest, indicating weaknesses. A score of 5 is the highest, denoting excellent visuals, strong content knowledge, and high quality presentation skills.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Individual Presentation Rubric

Category 1 (0-9 pts) 2 (10-19 pts) 3 (20-29 pts) 4 (30-39 pts) 5 (40-50pts)
Visual Format is Visuals are Visuals are Visuals are of Visuals are
Appearance simplistic; visuals adequate but appropriate; moderate quality; excellent and
are unreadable; may contain Visuals may be visuals are enhance the
Total visuals are not errors; visuals do difficult to read readable and understanding;
pts/section: 10 appropriate for the not greatly or interpret. easy to visuals are
presentation enhance the understand; easy to read
Pts Earned: presentation and interpret

__________

Content Presenter does not Very little depth Presenter Presenter Presenter
Knowledge appear to of information demonstrates a demonstrates a demonstrates
understand the given; presenter basic clear an excellent
Total topic; presenter has trouble understanding of understanding of understanding
pts/section: 15 cannot answer answering the project and the project and of the project
questions about questions about subject matter; subject matter; and subject
Pts Earned: their project the topic; little Presenter can answers matter;
understanding of answer basic questions answers
__________ the project or questions about accurately; depth questions
topic the topic; and quality of accurately;
demonstrated. Adequate information quality of
amount of enhances the information is
information presentation excellent
given
Quality of Presentation is Presentation is Presentation is Presentation is Presentation is
Presentation inadequate; basic; presenter good; most slides well done; excellent;
presenter does not reads slides and are read with presenter speaks presenter
Total speak clearly and provides little some clearly; some speaks clearly
pts/section: 25 merely reads the elaboration; elaboration; slides are read; without
text; overall overall overall overall reading;
Pts Earned: presentation is presentation presentation presentation Overall
weak and basic meets the basic shows some presents an presentation
__________ requirements basic insight. appropriate level adds to the
of understanding understanding
of the subject

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy