Colour As Sensation in Visual Art and in Science.
Colour As Sensation in Visual Art and in Science.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The MIT Press and Leonardo are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Leonardo.
http://www.jstor.org
Jonathan C. Fish*
Abstract-Contemporary colour science and colour art are, for the most part, on separate paths
in spite of strong reasons for unity and collaboration. It is argued that this schism is not based
on any intrinsic incompatibility, but on causes that are symptomatic of a disorientated culture.
These causes are recent in origin and may be classified into those that are common to art or to
science, in general, and those that are peculiar to the subject of colour. Prominent in the latter
class is the failure by artists to appreciate the importance of distinguishing colour sensations
from the external causes of these sensations and the inevitable priority given in science to the
objective, rather than to the subjective, aspects of colour.
It is suggested that material for a common philosophy, deeper than that of medium or
technique, can be found in the study of colour sensation as part of the wider problem of relating
private experience to external reality. An important example is provided by a discussion of
contemporary uncertainties about the number and nature of colour attributes and of the
relevance that this problem has for the visual arts. Some of the author's kinetic artworks and
colour demonstrations pertinent to the subject are discussed.
I.
Delacroix and Georges Seurat in the colour
Since C. P. Snow first published his 'Two Cul- science of their day have been well documented.
tures' lecture [1], the separation of science from In spite of their pioneering attempts, a reaction
the so-called humanities and the arts in western ensued leading to the wide-spread belief that the
industrial countries has been much discussed. In scientific knowledge of colour is useless, if not
the words of W. D. Wright, a pioneer of colour harmful, to visual artists. Thus this early attempt
science, 'We have in the subject of colour a quite by painters to bridge the gap between art and
specific example of the two cultures, in which science was premature.
artist and scientist speak a language the other
does not understand. We have a responsibility to
II.
put an end to this dichotomy, and if, as I now
believe, the scientist's concept of colour is incom- I believe that one of the reasons for the failure
plete, then it is high time we developed a more of artists generally to accept colour science as
adequate philosophy of colour to which both essential knowledge has been confusion between
artist and scientist can subscribe' [2]. (For the colour as it is subjectively experienced and the
view that science is not a culture in the traditional external causes of that experience, namely mate-
sense see Ref. 3.) rial substances or the light reflected by them. J. S.
In the first half of the 19th century, painters were Mill pointed out over a century ago that the
receptive to science and also to the idea, ridiculed confusion is preserved in the everyday English
today, that there might be precise rules in visual language. This is still true. Mill wrote: 'We have a
art similar to the laws of nature [4-6]. In that name for the objects which produce in us a certain
period, black and white photography was in- sensation: the word white. We have a name for
vented, which may have caused a shift in the the quality of those objects, to which we ascribe
emphasis in painting towards colour and moti- the sensation: the name whiteness. But when we
vated some artists to study its properties. The speak of the sensation itself (as we have not
interests of the painters J. M. W. Turner, Eugene occasion to do this often except in our scientific
speculations), language, which adapts itself for
the most part only to the common uses of life, has
*Painter,kineticartist,teacher,biochemist,21 CollegeRoad, provided us with no single-worded or immediate
Cneltenham, Gloucestershire,GL53 7HY, England. (Re- designation; we must employ a circumlocution,
ceived 7 Sept. 1979) and say, the sensation of white or the sensation
89
sensation and used this triad as the colour struc- use in art. For example, effective compositionin
ture for some of his paintings [4]. The same paintinginvolves carefullydeterminedcolour dif-
pigment-sensation error appears in Piet Mon- ferences-sometimes subtle modulations, some-
drian's restricted use of these colours 90 years times strong contrasts. In each instance painters
later. Turner and Mondriansucceeded superbly choosingcolourswill, perhapsunconsciously,ask
in their use of colour, despite their incorrect themselves, 'In how many differentways can two
assumption. colour sensations be alike or be different?'Sur-
Perhapsit was the realizationthat 19th-century prisingly,this questionis still a subjectof debate,
colour science had not adequatelydifferentiated even amongstcolour scientists.
between stimuli and sensations that led to its Since sensations are subjective and priorityis
abandonmentfollowing its seemingly premature given to objective measurement, emphasis in
use in Impressionism and Neo-Impressionism. colour science until recentlyhas been put on the
The pseudo-scientifichypotheses of colour har- study of stimuli rather than on the study of
mony of the chemist Michel Eugene Chevreul sensations. This has resultedin the sophisticated
(1839) and of the painter Seurat may have done subject of colorimetry,which provides a way of
more harm than good to the cause that they describingcolour stimuli by combiningphysical
espoused. Henri Matisse, departing from Neo- measurementwith the knowledge, obtained by
Impressionism,wrote: 'My choice of coloursdoes research,of a typicalhumancolourresponse.
not rest on any scientific theory; it is based on This methodis commonlyappliedto an isolated
observation, on sensitivity, on felt experiences. colour stimulus, that is, one that is uniformand
Inspiredby certain pages of Delacroix, an artist has very dark surroundings.For these conditions
like Signac is preoccupied with complementary and for normalcolour vision at daylightlevels of
colours, and the theoretical knowledge of them light intensity, it has been determinedthat only
will lead him to use a certain tone in a certain three variablesof the stimulus are relevant to a
place. But I simplytry to put down colourswhich specific colour sensation. These variablescan be
rendermy sensation'[14]. expressed in different ways, but the most perti-
In 1959Naum Gabo expressedan opinion that nent triad here are the three that describe light
is probablywidely shared amongst artiststoday. obtainedby mixingmonochromaticlight (light of
He wrote: 'All textbook theories about colours a single wavelength)with white light (light, such
are concerned with their chemical and physical as sunlight, of two or more wavelengths that
propertiesand have no relationwhateverto their produces an achromatic (hueless) response) to
aestheticnature. match the given colour stimulus.Thus a stimulus
'An artistcan be absolvedfrom the necessityof can be specified quantitativelyby the three vari-
knowing all that the scientist knows about col- ables describingthe mixturethat matchesit. The
ours. Except for some practical information variablesare: (1) luminance-a measure of total
which it is necessary for him to have about the intensity of the stimulus (radiation) weighted
treatmentof pigmentsand materials,the scientific wave-length by wavelength according to the
knowledge of their chemical and physicalprop- visual sensitivity of an internationallyaccepted
erties is apt to confuse the artist more than to standardobserver;(2) dominantwavelength-the
enlightenhim in his art and to distracthim from wavelengthof the monochromaticlight required
knowingwhat his experiencesof colour are' [15]. in mixturewith white light to matchthe stimulus
The firstsentence above is untrue. Presumably and (3) colorimetricpurity-the ratio of the lumi-
Gabo had not read Ewald Hering's Outlinesof a nance of the monochromaticlight to the lumi-
Theory of the Light Sense [12] or David Katz's nance of the mixture.
World of Colour [10]. However, to the second These three variablesare psychophysicalvari-
sentence quoted, it is embarrassinglyharder to ables, and the colour they describeis here called
find more than a partial refutation, such as pre- psychophysicalcolour in order to distinguishit
sented above. from colour sensation or psychological colour.
It must be noted that Matisse was wrong to The reasonfor this is that physicalmeasurements
imply that, if colour science were to be useful, it of the light are used to calculatethree numerical
would play a role in the making of aesthetic values. The link with a typical colour responseis
decisions. Before artists can make colour deci- made by weightingthe measurementsusinginter-
sions, they must have a conceptual framework nationallyacceptedcoefficientsthat are obtained
with which to think about colour experienceand from colour matchingdata for a standardobser-
also a knowledge of the stimulus conditions by ver. These weighted numericalvalues are then
whichthis experienceis produced. used to calculatethe three psychologicalvariables
[9].
V.
VI.
While contemporary artists generally have
made little use of pertinentnew knowledgeabout I have selected for discussion here three
colour [9], it should be pointed out that there are psychophysicalvariables (luminance, dominant
certaindifficultiesin colour science that hinderits wavelength and colorimetricpurity), which are
screen. Now suppose that the luminanceof the indicatedabove. (A demonstrationof this can be
white surroundis increasedto about half that of given with the use of my kinetic light box de-
the target. The target now begins to look like a scribedin Section IX.)
brilliantlycoloured surface that is emitting light By itself the additionof lightnessas a variable
(it gives the illusion of being fluorescent).As the of colour is not sufficientto invalidatethe use of
luminanceof the surroundis raised further, the three variablesto describesurfacecolours,if they
target becomes less brilliant and resembles a are assumedto be viewed under the same illumi-
normalcolouredsurface.As the luminanceof the nation, for in this case brightnessis irrelevant.
surroundis made higher than that of the target, The same cannot be said about brillianceor, in a
two new attributesof the colour sensationappear more limited sense, greyness (as indicated be-
that are not presentin isolatedstimulibut that are low). (I think the word blacknesswould be more
normally present in the colour sensations pro- appropriate.)One can readily be convincedthat
duced by coloured areas in paintings.Therefore, this is an attributeof non-isolatedcolours, if one
a stimulus-basedconcept about the attributesof notes that the specific colour sensations neutral
colour sensation as they are experienced by a grey, ochre, brown, olive green, maroon and
personviewinga colouredarea in a paintingmust navy blue are not elicited by isolated stimuli.
be based not on three psycho/physicalvariables Those who insist on the use of three attributesto
but at least on six, three for the stimulusassoci- describepsychologicalcolour must explainthese
ated with the coloured area and three for the distinctivesensationsby the assumptionthat they
surround. (In Leonardo, Ref. 22, a method has are simplydarkeror less saturatedversionsof the
been discussedfor extendingthe luminancerange corresponding colours, white, yellow, orange,
of colours in a paintingby selective illumination green, red and blue. Whetheror not brownreally
of parts of it. A striking 3-dimensionalappear- looks like a mixture of orange and black or
ance may be producedby so doing.) whetherit is 'unique'is anotherquestion[24].
In a fascinatingand provocativebook, Evans One important point made by Evans is that
has suggested that, except when the stimulusis lightness and saturationare perceivedseparately
isolated againsta darkbackground,there are not from greyness. Another is that separate colour
three but five variablesof coloursensationrelated attributesare not necessarilyindependent from
to the six stimulusvariables [21]. In additionto one another. In the past this has caused confu-
the attributesof brightness, hue and saturation sion. For example, the series of coloursextending
already described, there are two additionalvari- fromblackthroughgrey to white has usuallybeen
ables, lightnessand brilliance.Both lightnessand conceived as the variation of a single attribute.
brilliance are related to the luminance of the Accordingto Evans, however, two attributesare
stimulusrelativeto the luminanceof its surround, concernedthat vary simultaneously.As the series
but brilliance varies with dominant wavelength progresses from black to white the colours
whereas lightness does not. The term lightness become lighter (lightness increases), but sim-
correspondsto the artists'termstonalityand value ultaneously they become less grey, or more
of a surface colour. While the attributeof light- brilliant,(Fig. 2, top).
ness may be indicated by the psychophysical The evidence that lightness is separate from
luminancefactor, the relation is not a linear one greyness (brilliance) is based on absorbing re-
(Section IX). search to which justice cannot be done here.
Brightness in related (that is, non-isolated) Briefly, Evans discovered that, when the lumi-
colours is the impressionof illuminationand is nance of a very high puritystimulusis decreased
relatedto the total luminanceof the stimulusplus from a high value and the luminanceof a white
that of the surround.A piece of coal in strong surroundis held constant, the relativeluminance
sunlightlooks both dark and bright, whilstwhite (the ratio of one to the other) at which greyness
paper in a dark room looks light but dim. This first appearsconstitutesa thresholdquantitythat
distinctionwas made long ago (1911) by David varies greatlywith the dominantwavelength(and
Katz, who demonstratedthat the visual mechan- hence the hue) of that stimulus.Lightness,on the
ism is able to separate informationabout illumi- other hand, varies only with the relative lumi-
nationfrom that about the reflectingpropertiesof nance. To comprehend this, compare in 'the
surfaces[10]. Part of the fascinationof paintingis mind's eye' the sensations evoked by viewing a
the way in which the visible lightnessof pigments chrome yellow and an ultramarinepaint sample.
may generate paradoxicalillusions of brightness. Both sensations can be produced without any
Faber Birren in an article in Leonardo has pre- discernablegrey content and of equal brilliance,
sented illustrationsshowingseveral differentillu- yet, when matched, the blue is darker than the
sions of illuminationthat may be producedwith yellow. The sensation of greyness of a colour is
the use of paint [23]. On the other hand, artists not the same sensationas its darkness.Evansused
who work with coloured light rather than pig- the word brilliance to refer to two mutually
ments know that it is possible to elicit the illusion opposite attributes, greyness and fluorence, the
of pigmentedsurfacesfrom the projectionof light apparentfluorescenceof very brilliantstimuli.
on the back of a translucentscreen. In fact, all Unfortunately, Evans died before the publi-
surface colours can be produced this way, as cationof his book and, since muchof the research
I.HTtA 5vS
(HS.II qs5
4'1X/^rm^&5;ES
....
....
i:
Top left: Jonathan Fish. Colour adaptation box, perspex, wood, 30 x 20 x 20 cm, 1970. (Fig. 7, cf. page 96)
Top right: Pavel Kuznetsov. 'Kirghizian Woman', oil on canvas, 85 x 59 cm, 1919. (Fig. 3, cf. page 141)
Center: Paul Re. III-9: 'Front and Back', acrylic paint on Masonite 34.5 x 60.5 cm, 1975. (Photo: K. Cornyn,
San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.) (Fig 7, cf. page 107)
Bottom left: Roberto Donnini. 'Immagina in Progress', collage, paper, wood (mahogany), 65 x 135 cm, 1974 (unfinished).
(Fig. 2, cf. page 122)
Bottom right: Tariffe Raslain. Untitled, acrylic on canvas. 114 x 162 cm, 1979. (Fig. 5, cf. page 132)