Notes Community Mobilization Skills Level 5 2018
Notes Community Mobilization Skills Level 5 2018
Social mobilization is the process of bringing together all feasible and practical intersect oral
allies to raise awareness
Also Community mobilization can be defined as the act of encouraging and engaging the
community to participate in the creation of safe cities and communities for women and girls.
This process must involve the whole community, not just the specific actors who are directly
involved in a safe cities for women programme. A community could be considered “mobilized”
when all members feel as though the issue of women’s and girls’ safety is important to them and
worthy of action and support.
Secure strong leadership Engage strong leadership with community member support to
drive the community-wide efforts. Strong leaders can include both individuals who take
on the work and the organization(s) that spearhead collaborative efforts. Lead
organizations should possess a number of key characteristics including: the will to serve
as the leader of the community mobilization effort over a significant period of time; the
capacity to provide both infrastructure and human resources; financial stability; the
ability to garner and manage financial resources, and the respect and support of the
community.
Ensure that individuals and organizations in leadership positions have adequate support
and resources.
Develop a formal structure that can effectively lead community change efforts. This
structure serves six essential functions: providing overall strategic direction, facilitating
dialogue between partners, managing data collection and analysis, handling
communication, coordinating community outreach, and mobilizing funding.
Establish key structures and develop guiding documents to help facilitate the
coordination of community-wide efforts. These may include specific committees (such as
steering committees and subcommittees dedicated to a certain issue or strategy),
organizational charts, codified rules of operation (such as bylaws), policy statements
adopted by the partnership, and formal letters of agreement for those who lead, organize,
and participate in the community-wide effort.
The needs assessment research will inform the direction of the mobilization effort by
serving as the basis for creating a strategic plan, program activities, internal
communication plans, and public education campaigns. Be sure to clearly define the
community that the partnership is designed to serve whether it is by geographic location
or other population characteristics.
Draft a strategic plan that lays out the partnership’s goals (the explicit ways that
community partners are going to address the problems identified in the needs assessment)
and objectives (the activities that will be carried out in pursuit of the goal). The strategic
plan should identify the social, structural, and individual changes that will lead to
reductions in teen pregnancy and birth rates.
o Social changes include increased public will; greater community leadership
capacity; increased and high quality community participation, and supportive
community norms.
o Structural changes include changes made by institutions such as schools, health
departments, and family planning centers and/or changes in policies and practices
that support individual behavior change.
o Individual changes include shifts in knowledge, skills, and behaviors among both
youth and adults.
Ensure that goals and objectives are SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic,
and time-framed).
Explore a wide range of funding opportunities to ensure that the strategies and activities
can continue beyond the life of the original funding cycle. Consider diverse funding
sources including foundation grants, gifts from individual donors, and in-kind donations
from organizations and business in the area. Focus on local resources whenever possible.
Consider drafting standard fundraising language that can be used for a variety of “asks.”
Make sure to include the best argument for why the community partnership is important
as well as your mission, goals, objectives, strategies, and plans for evaluation. Don’t
forget to add specific information about the community from the needs assessment.
Educate and inspire the community by holding forums, engaging local media, designing
public service announcements, creating billboard campaigns, drafting letters to the editor,
launching web-based and social media campaigns, or holding home health parties, parent
meetings, roundtables, and conferences. The goal of public education campaigns is to
generate awareness, motivate action, encourage funding, and keep the community
focused on the issue at hand.
Remember to tailor the messages to the community, incorporate data from the needs
assessment, and chose spokespeople who resonate with the intended audience.
Decide in advance how the partnerships are going to define success and remember that
there is often a long delay between when a partnership begins its activities and when
there is a measurable impact on youth in the community (such as a reduction in teen birth
rates). Set key benchmarks and progress points along the way.
Design both process and outcome evaluations and decide on the intervals at which each
will be conducted. Process evaluations will help determine, for example, how many
community members have participated in each activity and whether the activity was
carried out as originally planned. Outcome evaluations will assess whether the
partnership resulted in expected changes in the community.
Conduct an evaluation to help determine the impact of the mobilization effort – that is,
whether the partnership was successful in building leadership, shifting norms in the
community, harnessing community buy-in, and mobilizing financial resources. Evaluate
the partnership by looking at the quality of the strategic plan, level of member
participation, total number of actions implemented, satisfaction of members and staff,
collaboration of members and member agencies, members’ knowledge of the problem at
hand, perceived ownership and empowerment of members, partner mobilization and
maintenance, and team functioning.
References
Chervin, D.D., Philliber, S., Brindis, C., Chadwick, A.E., Revels, M.L., Kamin, S. L., Wike,
R.S., Kramer, J.S., Bartelli, D., Schmidt, C.K., Peterson, S.A., Valderrama, L.T. (2005).
Community capacity building in CDC’s Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the
Prevention of Teen Pregnancy.
Butterfoss, F.D., Lachance, L., & Orians, C.E. (2006). Building Allies Coalitions: Why
Formation Matters. Health Promotion Practice, 7 (2), 23S-33S.(Guidance Document)
Zakocs, R. C., & Edwards, E. M. (2006). What explains community coalition effectiveness?: a
review of the literature. American journal of preventive medicine, 30(4), 351.(Review)
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. A. (2001).
Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework.
American journal of community psychology, 29(2), 241-261.(Review)
Objectives of community Mobilization:
Help stakeholders to form a group and establish the self-reliant organization that can
plan, design, construct, operate, maintain, manage, govern and finance their water
delivery and disposal systems optimizing various interests of stakeholders
Facilitate assessment and prioritization of needs and resources mobilization
Promote communication and train stakeholders in problem - solving, decision making,
and conflict resolution
Built community's capabilities in organization and system management
Smooth relationships between community and service! water providing agency
Coordinate with technical staff to facilitate community participation in the project
Process documentation, evaluation, and development.
Every person has the right to feel and be safe in their community and when all members
understand and support this sentiment, they can work together to make positive changes in the
physical structure, the policies, and the attitudes that shape their city. Thus, community
mobilization is important because the community itself is ultimately responsible for and affected
by situations of safety or insecurity. Conversely, if the community is not mobilized in creating
safe cities for women and girls, the ideas and initiatives put forward by safe cities for women
programme will not be supported and will not be put into practice in the day-to-day interactions
of people in the city or community.
Primary Stakeholder
Primary stakeholders are persons, groups, organizations or other entities that are actively
involved in forest–related activities and are directly affected by the participatory approach and
can thus significantly influence the process or project. In many cases, primary stakeholders can
be viewed as those stakeholders that need to be included if objectives of forest management in
the area are to be met.
Secondary Stakeholder
Secondary stakeholders are not directly involved in, or affected by, forest – related activities or
the participatory approach. They may, however, be indirectly affected (for example a local shop
owner indirectly benefiting from a tourist venture in the nearby forest due to an increased
number of customers), or are interested and willing to participate in the process in different ways
and stages.
Suggested materials/references
1. Abbott, Lewis F. (2007) Theories of Industrial Modernization and Enterprise
Development: A Review, 2nd Revised edition, Industrial Systems Research, Michigan
2. Abraham, Anita and Jean-Phillippe Platteau, (2001), Participatory Development in the
Presence of Endogenous Community Imperfections’ University of Namur, Belgium
3. Adam Fforde (2013), Understanding Development Economics: Its Challenge to
Development Studies As Social Theory, Routledge, London
4. Alison Gilchrist, Marilyn Taylor (2011), The Short Guide to Community Development,
Policy Press, Bristol
5. Brocklesby M. A and Fisher E. (2003), Community Development in Sustainable
Livelihoods. Approach, An Introduction, Community Development Journal 38(3), 185-98
6. Bryant Myers (2011), Walking with the Poor: Principles and Practices of
Transformational Development, Revised, Expanded ed., Orbis Books (USA), Maryknoll
7. Caroline Harper, Nicola Jones, Rachel Marcus, Sophie Laws (2013), Research for
Development: A Practical Guide, 2nd Revised edition, Sage Publications Ltd, London
8. Chitere, O. (1994), Community Development: Its conceptions and Practice with
Emphasis on Africa. Nairobi: Gideon S. Were Press
9. Jolin M, Schmitz P, & seldon W. (2012) needle-moving community collaborative: a
promising approach to address America’s biggest challenges. New York bridgespan
group ( model)
10. Jolin M, Schmitz P, & seldon W. (2012) needle-moving community collaborative: a
promising approach to address America’s biggest challenges. New York bridgespan
group ( model)