01 Particle Sizing by Laser Difraction PDF
01 Particle Sizing by Laser Difraction PDF
Dr Anne Virden
Product technical specialist – diffraction and analytical imaging
anne.virden@malvern.com
226μm
Max. length
Min. length
Sedimentation rate
Max. length
Min. length Sedimentation rate
Sieve aperture
Max. length
Sedimentation rate Sieve aperture
Min. length
Max. length
Sedimentation rate Sieve aperture
Surface area
Min. length
Max. length
Sedimentation rate Sieve aperture
Surface area
Min. length
Data acquisition
system
Light source
IP65 enclosures
Side scatter
detectors
633nm red
laser
Precision
folded optics
© 2017 Malvern Instruments Limited
Measuring the scattering data: Mastersizer 3000
Measurement cell
Back scatter
detectors
Extinction detectors:
51 and 63
Particle size
0.1nm 1nm 10nm 100nm 1μm 10μm 100μm 1mm 10mm
Laser diffraction
Spatial filter velocimetry
Sieving
Automated imaging
Electrozone sensing
Sedimentation
Dynamic light scattering
Nanoparticle tracking
Resonant mass measurement
Taylor dispersion analysis
Optical alignment
Data analysis
Dispersion
% Error
Sampling
Instrumentation
Particle size
2.50
2.00
Minimum mass / g
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Dv90 / μm
after ultrasound
Median Mode
% Volume
%
Diameter
Mode
Median
% Volume
%
49% 51%
Diameter
100
90
Cummulative distribution / %
80
70
% Volume
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Diameter
Dx10 Dx50 Dx90
D[4,3] =7.95
D[4,3] = 11.2
D[3,2] = 34.4μm
D[3,2] = 59.1
Volume
%%
Dx100
› Percentiles
› Averages, weighted by number, surface area or volume
› Avoid parameters with high variability, such as Dx100
© 2017 Malvern Instruments Limited
Choosing the right parameter to follow the process
› Blend of coarse and fine particles
100
90
Cumulative volume %
80
70
coarse
60 1% fines
50 5% fines
10% fines
40
20% fines
30 30% fines
20 fines
10
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Size / um
250
200
Size / um
Dv10
150 D[3,2]
Dv50
100 D[4,3]
Dv90
50
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fines /%
Evolutions in Direct Compression, Douglas McCormick, Pharmaceutical Technology, April 2005. Pg 52-62
Measurement
s Specification s
Product Specification
Particle Size
How to Establish Manufacturing Specifications, Donald J. Wheeler, Statistical Process Controls Inc.
Posted on spcpress.com May 2003
Coarse
Fine particles
particles
Choice of
Sampling
dispersant
Sonication
Measurement
(dispersion
time
energy)
Dispersant
Sampling
Agglomerated Dispersed
Polarity
Organic acids
Use surfactants Alcohols
(methanol / ethanol / isopropyl alcohol)
to improve Simple alkanes
wetting (hexane / heptane/ iso-octane / cyclohexane)
Carry out a
beaker test
Stabilization Examples
90
80
70
60
Size / um
50
Stirring
40
30
20
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Measurement no.
90
80
70
60
Size / um
50
40
Ultrasound
30
20
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Measurement no.
90
80
70
60
Size / um
50
40
30
After
20
Ultrasound
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Measurement no.
10
8
Obscuration / %
Ultrasound off
6
Ultrasound on
2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Measurement no.
Obscuration
Loss of scattering
on inner detectors
Trend across repeat
measurements
Agglomerates dispersing
Without
ultrasound
With
ultrasound
90
80
70
60
Size / um
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Measurement no.
90
80
50 citrate
40
• pH can also be important
• ‘The use of zeta potential measurements for
improving dispersion during particle size
30
determination’ (MRK373)
20
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Measurement no.
Av RSD
13.3μm 13.3 0.465%
Av RSD
7.32μm 7.32 0.11%
Av RSD
3.77μm 3.77 0.0357%
Detector
Low angle
detectors
Detector
Increase in
scattering angle
Low angle
detectors
Fine 5% to 10%
Low obscurations are used to avoid multiple
scattering
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Stir speed / rpm
5
% RSD (Dv50)
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Measurement duration / s
Air pressure
Sampling
Coarse
Fine particles
particles
Feed
Air rate
pressure
Sampling
Feed rate
Energy/aggression
Time
High pressure
140
130
120
110
Dv50 / um
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Air Pressure / bar
Volume density / %
6
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Size classes / m
‘For particles smaller than about 50μm Mie theory offers the best general solution’
ISO13320
Refracted light
Absorption
‘The advantage of this equation is that it is relatively simple and quick to calculate
‘This Fraunhofer approximation does not make use of any knowledge of the optical
properties of the material’
ISO13320
© 2017 Malvern Instruments Limited
Scattering models: Fraunhofer approximation
ISO13320
© 2017 Malvern Instruments Limited
Mie vs Fraunhofer: Data quality advice
‘Good understanding of the influence of the complex refractive index in the light scattering
from particles is strongly advised in order to apply the Mie theory or the Fraunhofer
approximation appropriately.’
ISO13320
0 Latices
0.001 Emulsions
Refractometer measurements
Empirical/semi-empirical
Residual = 0.83%
Example - unweighted