BGM On Litigation Management
BGM On Litigation Management
Litigation Management
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed in this material are those of author(s). The Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India may not necessarily subscribe to the views expressed by the author(s).
The information cited in this material has been drawn from various sources. While every
efforts have been made to keep the information cited in this material error free, the Institute or
any office do not take the responsibility for any typographical or clerical error which may have
crept in while compiling the information provided in this material. Further, the information
provided in this material are subject to the provisions contained under different acts and
members are advised to refer to those relevant provision also.
E-mail : idtc@icai.in
Website : www.idtc.icai.org
Price : 140/-
ISBN : 978-81-8441-844-6
Our members with their expertise can help trade and industry by preventing and
resolving the disputes. Considering the expertise of the members and the opportunities
available in the area of litigation, the Indirect Taxes Committee of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India has come out with a Course on Litigation Management
and has also developed Background Material for the same. The material covers
principles of evidence, drafting and pleadings, ethics and etiquette, litigation strategy
and mock tribunal etc. which seems very comprehensive.
I congratulate CA. Madhukar N. Hiregange, Chairman, CA. Sushil Kumar Goyal, Vice
Chairman and other members of the Committee for their efforts in bringing out this
highly useful publication. I am sure that the members, specifically those who are
involved in area of litigation in indirect taxes would find this material immensely useful.
1. Introduction
The word ‘representation’, in the context of indirect tax litigation, would mean the act of
appearing in a client’s cause to offer explanation, information or defense in relation to
proceedings before the authorities or Tribunal.
Representation (discussed in detail later), is a legal right that upholds one’s right to personal
liberty which has beengranted to us by various statutes including taxation relatedstatutes, to
provide the client (the person represented) the benefit of professional assistance in presenting
his defense. But for the specific provisions in the taxing statutes permitting appearance
through a representative, the party or assessee has to appear in person, which may not be
very effective due to reasons like lack of knowledge of the subject, lack / absence of legal and
communication skills, inadequate time at disposal etc.
2. Importance
Representation in tax litigation proceedings before the authorities or Tribunal is an important
service which a CA can provide to his client. Having used the services of the CA in compliance
function, they would also look forward to assistance by the same CA in case of litigation later.
In fact, representation can also be a stand-alone assignment undertaken by a CA and he can
specialize in handling litigation matters upto the Tribunal level. If the matter advances to High
Court or Supreme Court, although a CA cannot legally represent the client, the CA can provide
valuable assistance to lawyers in handling the matters before such fora.
Indirect tax was introduced close to five years ago and has been conducted successfully
across the country. More recently, the certificate courses are being conducted with a
specialization in the field of indirect tax i.e. Certificate Course on Service Tax.
It is thus felt that CAs could have enormous opportunities in handling indirect tax litigation. In
general, CAs can provide assistance to their clients in the following areas:
(a) Assisting the client to prepare for departmental audit and due diligence audits.
(b) Advising the client during audit and investigation and assistance in clarifying the issues
raised by the audit/investigation team, preparation of statements/ reports to be
submitted to audit/ investigation team, preparation and submission of documents
requested by the department, drafting of letters, correspondence and reply to audit
observations.
(c) Advising the client on the course of action to be adopted i.e. whether to litigate or not on
the issues raised by the department in the course of audit/ investigation.
(d) Representing clients in adjudication proceedings by drafting reply to show cause notice,
submissions and attending hearings and post-hearing filing of submissions/evidence (if
needed).
(e) Representing clients in appellate proceedings before the first appellate authority or
Tribunal. The professional assistance would encompass drafting of appeal including
statement of facts and grounds and appearance before the authority or Tribunal.
(f) Support functions in (a) and (b) supra, by assisting the other Counsel (CA or Advocate)
in the above areas including preparation of notes and briefing other Counsel.
(g) Assisting Advocates in matters before the High Court/Supreme Court including in
understanding facts for preparation of grounds for appeal, counter, rejoinder and legal
research.
4. Historical background
If we go back in history then we have record of vakils appointed to represent others’causes
before the Courts and other Officers. The concept slowly developed and as the laws were
codified, specific provisions were introduced to provide for appearance / representation by
authorized representative holding prescribed qualifications.
6. How to represent?
While representing before the Tribunal like CESTAT, there is a dress code prescribed which is
specifically dealt with later. There is no ‘right way’ of representing a case. There are various
skills and methods employed by an authorized representative while representing his client
before authorities and Tribunal. By experience, observation and thinking, each person
develops his own method of representation.
7. When to represent?
Representing a client in an investigation is neither generally permitted nor advisable, as the
representative becomes a witness. Attending summons on behalf of a client and giving
statements should be avoided, as the CA is not integrally involved in the operations of the
client, and as such, may not possess the required firsthand information and the expertise to
provide evidentiary statements.
11. Conclusion
At this juncture, it would also be relevant to refer to the Constitution of India, which is the
supreme law of the country. Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution have been interpreted by
the Courts to confer the right of being heard in any of the proceedings. In Maneka Gandhi v.
UoI 1978 AIR 597 (SC), the Hon’ble Supreme Court had interpreted these Articles and stated
that the right of being heard is part of the principles of natural justice and the procedure
established by law should be followed.
2. Contents of notice
The notice should not be vague and should clearly spell out the charges against the noticee. It
should draw reference to the relevant statutory provisions that are allegedly contravened by
the noticee. This would enable the noticee to admit or rebut the allegations and charges
contained in the notice. Further the notice should be served on the person chargeable to tax.
3. Contents of order
The order should contain findings on the issues raised in the notice and contentions and
submissions made by the noticee. The order should specifically address the contentions urged
by the noticee including judicial decisions cited. The adjudicating authority should apply his
mind to the facts, issues, contentions urged by the noticee and evidence on record and reach
a finding which forms the substance of his responsibility before passing the order.
4. Hearing
Indirect tax laws specifically contain provisions for conduct of hearing. Hearing is mainly
granted to understand, in person, the contentions of the noticee and identify the reasons for
differences. If a personal appearance by the noticee or through Counsel aides in this exercise,
that must be facilitated. It is not an empty formality as it enables the noticee to place on record
his submissions (in oral or in writing) and to lead evidence and cite precedents. The process
of appeal is not concluded until the last forum hears the matter.
statements, search the premises and seize documents. The information collected is thereafter
used as a basis to issue show cause notice and not to conclude the process of tax recovery
without giving the noticee the opportunity of being heard.
No administrative power can exist unsupervised. Any exercising authority having investigative
powers necessarily comes under the administrative supervision of a designated person who
has finite powers specified in law. Infinite powers or unspecified powers are both
impermissible. Administrative law is a salutary development in a society that operates on the
basis of ‘rule of law’. Restrictions in the powers of investigative authorities are not only
expressive but also implicit based on the purpose for which those powers have been
conferred. And no such power can be conferred by excluding judicial review.
Illustration 1: Service tax authorities visited the New Delhi branch premises of an assessee
and identified themselves as officers of the ‘audit wing’ of the tax department. They were
seeking some information about the business activities, details of taxable value of services,
service tax paid, etc., for the past five years. Assessee issued a copy of registration certificate
showing ‘centrallized’ registration at Bangalore HO and politely refused to provide any further
information. Officers were understandably taken aback and left. Assessee issued a letter to
the said officers with copy to Commissioner of ST, Bangalore referring to their visit and that no
other information other than RC copy was submitted. The matter concluded there because
having a centralized registration precludes every other office to exercise audit jurisdiction over
all branch offices.
Illustration 2: DGCEI authorities had visited the registered office of an assessee and had
soughtinformation about the business activities, details of taxable value of services, service
tax paid, etc., for the past five years. Assessee made note of the details required and asked
for some time to supply information that needed to be compiled and submitted (although new
reports or information not maintained need not be provided) but provided the audited financial
statements, half-yearly returns with working calculations and ledger extract of income
recognized, input credit and taxes paid. The officers worked out some tax liability and insisted
that some tax payment has to be made. The assessee politely expressed inability to make
payment at such short notice in a sudden inspection-led-demand. The officers left after making
their displeasure known. Assessee visited the office after a few days to submit the information
that was to be prepared. At that time, payment of tax (as computed by them) was discussed
and the same reply was given. After more than six months, a show cause notice was issued
which presently is pending adjudication and experts have advised that the issue raised is not
sustainable and there are favourable decisions passed by Tribunal.
opportunity of being heard to the noticee. He conducts the hearing before passing the Order.
The adjudicating authority allows cross-examination of witnesses, if requested, by the noticee.
The adjudicator is expected to consider the facts, allegations, submissions and evidence in a
holistic manner and pass a speaking order. The proceedings culminate in an order fully or
partially accepting the submissions of the noticee or all the proposals in the notice may be
confirmed. The adjudicating authority cannot proceed beyond the parameters of the
allegations leveled in the notice and make out a new case against the noticee.
8. Duties/powers of Tribunal
The Tribunal functions under the aegis of Ministry of Finance and has Benches at several
places. Matters are heard by the Division Bench (two members) or Single Member Bench. The
Tribunal has both Judicial Members and Technical Members. The Tribunal functions are
described as quasi-judicial functions. The procedures and manner of conduct of proceedings
are set out in the relevant Tribunal Procedure Rules, such as, CESTAT (Procedure) Rules,
2001. The Tribunal is the final ‘fact finding’ authority. Any delay in filing an appeal can be
condoned if sufficient cause is shown. The orders passed by the Tribunal are appealable
either before the High Court or Supreme Court.
Illustration 28: Central Excise authorities issued summons to Director of a Company and
raised questions about levy of duty on certain transactions and after explaining the provisions
put the question to the Director ‘Do you accept that duty is payable on the …… transaction?’ –
To this, the Director replied ‘I do not know the law so well as I am an Engineer.As such, I am
in no position to express an opinion about the levy of duty’. It is the right answer because ‘I do
not know’ is factually accurate because a Director of Company is not competent to reach a
conclusion about the levy and is only required to ensure that competent people are appointed
to attend to such matters in the Company.
1. Evidence
Evidence in the popular sense means “that by which facts are established to the satisfaction of
person enquiring”.
(b) “Relevant Fact” – One fact is said to be relevant to another when the one is connected
with the other in any of the ways referred to in the provisions of this Act relating to the
relevancy of facts
(c) “Facts in issue”. —The expression “facts in issue” means and includes—
any fact from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non-
existence, nature, or extent of any right, liability, or disability, asserted or denied in any suit or
proceeding, necessarily follows.
Explanation —Whenever, under the provisions of the law for the time being in force relating to
Civil Procedure, any Court records an issue of fact, the fact to be asserted or denied in the
answer to such issue is a fact in issue.
Illustration 31:
A is accused of the murder of B.
At his trial the following facts may be in issue:—
That A caused B’s death;
That A intended to cause B’s death;
That A had received grave and sudden provocation from B;
That A, at the time of doing the act which caused B’s death, was, by reason of unsoundness of
mind, incapable of knowing its nature.
Illustration 32:
There is an allegation that the XYZ Pvt. Ltd. engaged in construction activity has not paid
service tax on certain constructions undertaken by them. XYZ claims the said transaction
relates to construction of a building meant for religious use for a trust and is exempt from
service tax:
Facts Relevant Fact Facts in Issue
XYZ is a private limited Trust Deed / registration There is an entry in the
company certificate of the trust to notification exempting such
whom construction is transaction
undertaken
XYZ is engaged in the activity Registration certificate The entity to whom service is
of construction of buildings or issued by Income tax provided is a trust registered
civil structure department under section under 12AA of Income Tax
12AA Act
XYZ is paying service tax on Plan sanctioned by the local The building is meant for
its activities authority to construct the religious purposes
particular building
XYZ has not paid service tax
certain specified transaction
(b) Part II: Part II covering sections 56 to 100 provides as to what facts to be proved and
facts which need not be proved. Further, it also provides for the manner in which the facts are
to be proved.
(c) Part III: Remaining provisions i.e. Section 101 to 167 deals with burden of proof,
estoppels and provisions relating to witness.
5. Burden of Proof
‘Burden of proof’ is a duty placed upon a person to prove or disprove a disputed fact. In terms
of Section 101 of the Evidence Act, person who desires any Court to give judgment as to any
legal right or liability on the basis of the existence of the facts to which he asserts, must prove
that those facts exist. When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact, it is said that
the burden of proof lies on that person.
Burden to prove a particular fact is always on the person who alleges. However, once such
burden is discharged, the onus then shits to the other party. In A Raghavamma v. A
Chenchamma, AIR 1964 SC 136 – para 15, it was said that the burden of proof lies upon a
person who has to prove the fact and which never shifts. Onus of proof shifts, which is a
continuous process in the evaluation of evidence. In our opinion, in a suit for possession
based on title once the plaintiff has been able to create a high degree of probability so as to
shift the onus on the defendant, it is for the defendant to discharge his onus and in the
absence thereof the burden of proof lying on the plaintiff shall be held to have been
discharged so as to amount to proof of the plaintiff's title.
Under tax litigation, in the issues of classification of goods / services, the burden to prove that
the classification adopted by the assessee is wrong is always on the department. Similarly,
where the department alleges fraud, misrepresentation or existence of mens rea (culpable
state of mind) intention to evade for invoking extended period or imposing penalties, it is the
department whichhas to prove.
On the contrary, where it comes to claim for an exemption, the burden is on the assessee to
prove as to why and how he is eligible for exemption. However, once the same is proved by
the assessee, the onus then shifts to the department to disprove the same.
It shall be noted that, merely because the burden of proof is on the department, it does not
mean the assessee need not provide the evidences to support his case. Supplying of sufficient
evidence would support the case and the deciding authority, whether at the stage of
adjudication or appellate or Tribunal, would be able to appreciate and pass orders judiciously.
6. Degree of Proof
Degree of proof is that extent to which the fact shall have to be proved. It shall be noted that
under criminal matters, the proof shall be beyond reasonable doubt but the Tribunals have
held that in adjudicating proceedings, such degree of proof is not necessary. The adjudication
proceedings are to be determined on the facts and circumstances available in the particular
case. [Refer Kashi Prasad Saraff Vs. CC, 1993 (66) E.L.T. 409 (Trib.)]
7. Timing of Evidence
The assessee shall have to provide evidences supporting his contentions right from the stage
of investigation. However, providing of evidences at the stage of adjudication proceeding in
relation to show cause notice is very important and in terms of the rules governing appeal
procedures, new evidences may be rejected by appellate authority or Tribunal. (Refer Rule 5
of Central Excise (Appeal) Rules, 2001).
Illustration 34: Type and nature of evidence to be produced depends on nature of the dispute
and cannot be generalized. However, the following table illustrates the evidences that could
be produced for the nature of dispute listed therein.
Dispute on clandestine removal - Quantitative analysis of purchase and sale
goods from factory - Electricity consumption
- Bank statements to show receipts from customers and
payments to vendors.
Dispute on classification of Description of the goods
goods Chemical composition of goods
Technical literature about the goods
Dispute on classification of Explanation about the nature of activities.
services Agreement with the customer which details the scope of
services
Eligibility to cenvat credit Copy of the invoice/bill on the basis of which credit is
availed.
Explanation as to usage of the said input or input service
Short payment / Non-payment Provide copy of challans / provide copy of the extract of
of tax or duty (which is already cenvat register if paid by utilizing cenvat
paid but not considered by the
department)
8. Expert Advice
Section 45 of Evidence Act provides that when the Court has to form an opinion on a point of
foreign law, or of science, or art, or has to identity hand writing or finger-impressions, the
opinions of persons specially skilled in such foreign law, science or art, or in identification of
handwriting or finger impressions are relevant.
Under tax litigation, opinions of experts may be relevant on the composition of goods
manufactured or imported for the purpose of classification of goods.
Further, such expert opinion would be relevant to defend the case where the assessee has
taken certain legal positions based on the expert opinions.
the client obtained during his professional appointment. The disclosure of information of client
obtained during professional appointment is a misconduct as held by High Court in the case of
Council of Institute of CA Vs. Mani S Abraham, AIR 2000 Ker 2012.
However, the question that arises is whether communication between a CA and his client,
whom a CA is representing in tax litigation would fall under Section 126/127/129 of Evidence
Act. It is possible that CA could well fit in the ambit of ‘pleader’ which is defined to mean as
below under CPC and CrPC.
Section 2 (15) of CPC: "pleader" means any person entitled to appear and plead for another in
Court, and includes an advocate, a vakil and an attorney of a High Court
Section 2(q) of CrPC: "pleader", when used with reference to any proceeding in any Court,
means a person authorised by or under any law for the time being in force, to practice in such
Court, and includes any other appointed with the permission of the Court to act in such
proceeding.
It may be noted that since appearance by a chartered accountant before any adjudicating or
the appellate authority or the Tribunal would not be as appearance before any “court”,
immunity under Sections 126 or 127 would not be available to the communications between
the said Chartered Accountant and his client.
Apart from the above, the communications between CA and his client in relation to rendering
legal advice could fall under Section 129
11. Affidavits
Affidavits are written statement of facts voluntarily made by an affiant under an oath or
affirmation administered by a person authorized to do so by law.
Affidavits shall be confined to such facts as the deponent is able to prove on his own account.
Affidavit shall contain facts and grounds and not inferences or submissions.
There are conflicting views on the aspect whether affidavits, in themselves, are an evidence in
the court of law. (Source: Order XIX CPC)
1. Introduction
An appeal is judicial examination of an inferior court by a higher forum. An appeal is an
application to reverse, vary or set aside the judgment or decision or award of an inferior court
on the ground that it is wrongly decided or that as a matter of justice or law it requires to be
corrected. – Halsbury’s Laws of England – quoted in Maruti Udyog Ltd vs ITAT (2001) 117
Taxman 122 (Del. HC-DB).
Right to appeal is neither a natural right nor an inherent right. It does not exist unless
expressly conferred by statute. –Vijay Prakash D Mehta v. CC (72 STC 324). Hence, it is
important to be mindful of the express nature of the right to appeal conferred by the statute.
Excise, Customs and Finance Act have made elaborate provisions for appeals against
adjudication orders passed by excise / customs / service tax authorities. There is only one
appeal in case of orders of Commissioner, which in case of other orders (i.e., orders of
Superintendent, Assistant Commissioner, Deputy Commissionerr etc.,), first appeal is with
Commissioner (Appeals) and other with Tribunal. In some matters, revision matters application
lies with Government against order of Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals).
In this chapter the relevant provisions relating to appeal and CESTAT procedures that one
needs follow havebeen dealt.
2. Provisions of Appeal
Recovery of sums due to Government
Particulars Service tax Excise Customs
Section 87 11 142
Amount Any amount payable by a person to the credit of the Central
Government under any of the provisions of the Act or of the rules
made thereunder.
By whom Concerned Central Excise Officer or Customs Officer upon required
authorisation from Principal Commissioner or Commissioner.
Mode of recovery 1. May deduct or may require any other Central Excise Officer or
any officer of customs to deduct the amount so payable from any
money owing to such person which may be under the control of the
said Central Excise Officer or any officer of customs.
2. May, by notice in writing, require any other person from whom
money is due or may become due to such person, or who holds or
Statutory Provisions 23
the Principal
Commissioner of
Customs or
Commissioner of
Customs
Power If the officer has reason The concerned officer If the officer has reason
to believe that any may arrest any person to believe that any
person has committed an whom he has reason to person in India or within
offence, he may, by believe to be liable to the Indian customs
general or special order, punishment under the waters has committed
authorise any officer of Act or the rules made an offence, he may
Central Excise, not below thereunder. Any person arrest such person and
the rank of accused or reasonably shall, as soon as may
Superintendent of suspected of committing be, inform him of the
Central Excise, to arrest an offence under the Act grounds for such arrest.
such person. or any rules made Every person arrested
Where a person is thereunder, who on shall, without
arrested for any demand of any officer unnecessary delay, be
cognizable offence, duly empowered by the taken to a magistrate.
every officer authorised Central Government in
to arrest a person shall, this behalf, refuses to Where an officer of
inform such person of the give his name and customs has arrested
grounds of arrest and residence, or who gives any person, he shall, for
produce him before a a name or residence the purpose of releasing
magistrate within twenty- which such officer has such person on bail or
four hours. reason to believe to be otherwise, have the
In the case of a non- false, may be arrested same powers and be
cognizable and bailable by such officer in order subject to the same
offence, the Assistant that his name and provisions as the officer-
Commissioner, or the residence may be in-charge of a police-
Deputy Commissioner, ascertained. station has and is
as the case may be, subject to under the
shall, for the purpose of Code of Criminal
releasing an arrested Procedure, 1898.
person on bail or (The following offences
otherwise, have the shall be cognizable (a)
same powers and be prohibited goods; or (b)
subject to the same evasion or attempted
provisions as an officer evasion of duty
in charge of a police exceeding fifty lakh
station has, and is rupees - all other
passed in appeal or in revision and four copies of the order of the original
authority.
Explanation: "Copy for the purpose of this Rule shall mean a true copy
certified by the appellant or appellant's representative to be a true copy.
(2) In the case of an appeal which can be heard by a single Member,
Memorandum of appeal shall be filed in triplicate and number of copies of
the order shall be three instead of four.
(3) Where an appeal which can be heard by a single Member is
referred to or placed before a two-Member Bench or an appeal which can
be heard by a two-Member Bench is referred to a Larger Bench, the
appellant shall immediately furnish an additional copy of the memorandum
of appeal and of the order or orders of the lower authorities.
Rejection or 1. The Tribunal may, in its discretion, on sufficient cause being
amendment of shown, accept a memorandum of appeal which is not accompanied by the
memorandum of documents referred to in Rule 9 or is in any other way defective, and in
appeal: - Rule such cases may require the appellant to file such documents or, as the
11 case may be, make the necessary amendments within such time as it may
allow.
2. The Tribunal may reject the memorandum of appeal, if the
documents sought by the Tribunal are not produced, or the amendments
are not made, within the time-limit allowed.
Document 1. Where the parties to an appeal or application are being represented
authorising in such appeal or application by authorised representatives, the
representative to documents authorising such representatives to appear on their behalf
be attached to shall be appended to the memorandum of appeal, application or
the memorandum memorandum of cross-objection if they are signed by the authorised
of appeal – Rule representatives.
13 2. The said documents shall indicate clearly the status of the
authorised representatives as to whether they are relatives or regular
employees of the parties and the details of the relationship of
employment;
3. In cases where they are not relatives or regular employees, their
qualifications to act as authorised representatives under the Acts or, in
the case of a person referred to in rule 2(c)(ii), particulars of the
notification by which they have been appointed:
4. Where the authorised representative is a legal practitioner, such
document of authorisation shall be a duly executed vakalatnama.
Filling of 1. Subject to satisfaction of the Bench, in cases, where an authorised
authorisation at representative known to the Court has been engaged but is unable to file
a later stage: - immediately the document authorising him to appear and plead along with
Rule 14 the appeal or application for any reason, he may file memo of appearance
along with an undertaking to file duly executed vakalatnama or document
of authorisation during such time as the Bench may in its discretion allow.
2. In case the direction of the Bench (including extended time, if any)
is not followed, the Bench may in its discretion withhold the issue of the
order or stay its operation till the compliance is duly made and/or refrain
from extending the facility in future.
3. Any misrepresentation for the purpose of this Rule will be
considered as a misconduct and may invite the same action in the same
way as indicated in Section 35Q(5) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Reply to appeal After a copy of the appeal has been served, the respondents may file a
– Rule 15A reply within one month and on receipt thereof, the appellant may file a
rejoinder within one month or within such time as may be specified /
extended.
Preparation of 1. The appellant shall, along with the appeal or within one month of
paper book: - filing of the appeal, submit in such number of copies as of the
Rule 16 memorandum of appeal, a paper book containing copies of the
documents, statements of witnesses and other papers on the file of, or
referred to in the orders of, the departmental authorities, which he
proposes to rely upon at the hearing of the appeal.
2. The respondent may also file a paper book containing such
documents as are referred to in sub-rule (1), which he proposes to rely
upon at the time of hearing of the appeal, in such number of copies as of
the memorandum of appeal, within one month of the service of the notice
of the filing of the appeal on him, or within two weeks of the service of the
paper book, whichever is later.
3. The Tribunal may, in its discretion, allow the filing of any paper
book referred to in sub-rule (1) or sub-rule (2) after the expiry of the
period referred to therein.
4. The Tribunal may on its own motion direct the preparation of as
many copies as may be required of a paper book by and at the cost of the
appellant or the respondent, containing copies of such statements, papers
or documents as it may consider necessary for the proper disposal of the
appeal.
5. All paper books shall contain clearly legible documents duly paged,
indexed and be tagged firmly.
Date and place of The Tribunal shall notify to the parties the date and place of hearing of the
hearing to be appeal or application.
notified: - Rule The issue of the notice referred to in sub-rule (1) shall not by itself be
18 deemed to mean that the appeal or application has been admitted.
Action on The appellant does not appear when the appeal is called on for hearing,
appeal for the Tribunal may, in its discretion, either dismiss the appeal for default or
appellant's hear and decide it on merits:
default: - Rule In case an appeal has been dismissed for default and the appellant
20 appears afterwards and satisfies the Tribunal that there was sufficient
cause for his non-appearance when the appeal was called on for hearing,
the Tribunal shall make an order setting aside the dismissal and restore
the appeal.
Though the rule provides for dismissal for non- appearance, the appeal
shall have to be decided on merits – refer Balaji Steel Rolling Mills v
Commissioner of C.Ex. & Customs, 2014 (310) E.L.T. 209 (S.C.)
Hearing of In case the appellant appears and the respondent does not appear when
appeals ex the appeal is called on for hearing, the Tribunal may hear and decide the
parte: - RULE 21 appeal ex parte.
Continuance of Where in any proceedings the appellant or applicant or a respondent dies
proceedings or is adjudicated as an insolvent or in the case of a company, is being
after death or wound up, the appeal or application shall abate, unless an application is
adjudication as made for continuance of such proceedings by or against the successor-in-
an insolvent of interest, the executor, administrator, receiver, liquidator or other legal
a party to the representative of the appellant or applicant or respondent, as the case
appeal or may be:
application – Every such application shall be made within a period of sixty days of the
Rule 22 occurrence of the event. The Tribunal may condone the delay if it is
satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from
presenting the application within the period so specified, allow it to be
presented within such further period as it may deem fit.
Order to be Every order of the Tribunal shall be in writing and shall be signed and
signed and to dated by the Members constituting the Bench concerned.
dated – Rule 26 Last date of hearing of the matter shall be typed on the first page of the
order.
If the order is dictated on the Bench, the date of dictation will be the date
of the final order. If the order is reserved, the date of final order will be the
date on which the order is pronounced.
In cases, where gist of the decision is pronounced without the detailed
order, the last para of the detailed order shall specify the date on which
the gist of the decision was pronounced. In such cases, the date of the
final order shall be the date on which all the Members of the Bench sign
the order. If they sign on different dates, the last of the dates will be the
date of the order.
Procedure for 1. Every application preferred under the provisions of the Acts for stay
filing and of the requirement of making deposit of any duty demanded or penalty
disposal of stay levied shall be presented in triplicate
petitions: - Rule (a) by the appellant in person; or
28A (b) by his duly authorised agent; or
(c) sent by registered post to the Registrar or any other office
authorised to receive memoranda of appeals, as the case may be,
at the Headquarters of the Bench having jurisdiction to hear the appeal in
respect of which the application for stay arises.
2. One copy each of such application shall be served on the
authorised representative of the Commissioner or, as the case may be,
the Administrator simultaneously by the applicant.
3. Every application for stay shall be neatly typed on one side of the
paper and shall be in English and the provisions of rule 5 shall apply to
such applications.
4. An application for stay shall set forth concisely the following:
the facts regarding the demand of duty or penalty, the deposit
whereof is sought to be stayed;
the exact amount of duty or penalty and the amount undisputed
therefrom and the amount outstanding;
the date of filing of the appeal before the Tribunal and its number, if
known;
whether the application for stay was made before any authority
under the relevant Act or any civil court and, if so, the result thereof
(copies of the correspondence, if any, with such authorities to be
attached);
reasons in brief for seeking stay;
whether the applicant is prepared to offer security and, if so, in
what form; and
prayers to be mentioned clearly and concisely (state the exact
amount sought to be stayed).
5. The contents of the appeal / application / cross-objection shall be
supported by a verification regarding their correctness by the appellant or
respondent or the principal officer authorised to sign appeal / cross-
objection.
6. The Bench may, however, in a particular case direct filing of an
affidavit by the appellant / respondent or any other person, if so
considered necessary or desirable in the circumstances of a given case.
Sittings of the (1) The Tribunal shall not ordinarily hold sittings on Saturdays, nor on any
Tribunal: - Rule Sundays and other public holidays.
43 (2) The sitting hours of the Tribunal shall ordinarily be as under:
In New Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai and other location
From 10.30A.M. to 1.30 P.M. and from 2.15 P.M. to 4.45 P.M.
In Kolkata From 10.30A.M. to 1.15 P.M. and from 2.00 P.M. to 4.30 P.M.
Dress for the Every authorised representative other than a relative or regular employee
parties – Rule of a party shall appear before the Tribunal in his professional dress, if
48 any, and, if there is no such dress,-
Male - in a close-collared black coat, or in an open-collared black
coat, with white shirt and black tie; or
Female - in a black coat over a white sari or any other white dress:
Note: During the summer season from 15th April to 31st August, the
authorised representatives may, when appearing before a Bench of the
Tribunal, dispense with the wearing of a black coat.
Questions not The applicant shall not, except with the leave of the Authority, urge or be
specified in the heard in respect of any question other than the question specified in the
application - application but in pronouncing an advance ruling on the question set forth
Regulation 12 in the application, the Authority may at its discretion consider such other
aspects as may be necessary to pronounce the advance ruling on the
question specified in the application.
On a petition made by an applicant, the Authority may permit amendment
of a question, in appropriate cases.
Authorization to An authorized representative appearing for the applicant shall before the
be filed - commencement of the hearing, file before the Secretary, a document
Regulation 13 authorizing him to appear for the applicant.
Every authorized representative shall notify to the Secretary the address
of his office, before the commencement of the hearing.
Any change of an authorized representative shall be intimated by the
concerned party to the Secretary as well as to the other party to the
application.
Continuation of Even on the death or dissolution of the applicant, the application shall be
proceedings continued by the legal representatives, executors, administrators,
after the death, liquidators, assignees, etc. of the applicant. However, this continuation is
etc., of the only on approval by the Authority of a petition made in this regard.
applicant. -
Regulation 14.
Hearing of On the day fixed for hearing or any other day to which the case is
application - adjourned, the Authority shall hear the applicant or his authorized
Regulation 15 representative in cases where it is proposed to reject the application
or where the applicant seeks an opportunity of being heard;
the Authority may also hear the Commissioner or his authorized
representative, if it considers it necessary, before pronouncing its
advance ruling.
The Authority may, on such conditions as the circumstances of the
case require, adjourn the hearing of the application.
Hearing of In case an order is passed ex parte on merits because of non –
application ex appearance of either party or their authorized representatives, an
parte – application aside the ex parte order may be made within 7 days of receipt
Regulation 16 of that order.
If the authority is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for non-
appearance at the time of the original hearing, and after giving the other
party to the application a reasonable opportunity of being heard the ex
parte order may be set aside and the application restored
Withdrawal of The applicant may withdraw his application within thirty days from the
application - date of such application and thereafter only with the leave of the
Regulation 17 Authority.
Modification of The Authority may suomotu or on a petition by the applicant or the
the Commissioner,
order/advance Before pronouncement of an advance ruling or before an advance ruling
ruling. - pronounced has been given effect to,
Regulation 18. On being satisfied that an order/advance ruling was pronounced under
mistake of law or fact,
Modify such order/advance ruling in such respects as it considers
appropriate, after allowing the applicant and the Commissioner a
reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Rectification of The Authority may, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from
mistakes - the record, amend any advance ruling pronounced by it before such
Regulation 19 ruling has been given effect to.
Declaration of The regulation states that a ruling obtained on the basis of fraud or
advance ruling misrepresentation is void ab initio. The procedural aspects in this regard
to be void in are summarised below:
certain The revenue authorities may make a representation to the authority
circumstances - claiming fraud or misrepresentation. The representation is to be
Regulation 23 accompanied by an attested affidavit and attested copies of all
documents relied upon for making the representation.
If the authority is of a prima facie view that the application is
obtained by fraud or misrepresentation,a notice is sent to the
application informing of the grounds on which the ruling is void along
with copies of documents relied upon. A reasonable opportunity of
being heard is given (in writing and in person).
A copy of the notice is also sent to the revenue authorities and they
are given an opportunity of being heard as well.,
Proceedings of (1) When one or both of the Members of the Authority other than the
Authority - Chairperson is unable to discharge his functions owing to absence or
Regulation 27 vacancies etc., the Chairperson alone or the Chairperson and the
remaining Member may function as the Authority.
(2) In case there is difference of opinion among the Members hearing
an application, the opinion of the majority of Members shall prevail;
(3) Where the Chairperson and one other Member hear a case and are
divided in their opinion, the opinion of the Chairperson shall prevail.
Dress (1) An authorized representative shall appear before the Authority in
Regulation - dress prescribed for the members of his profession by the competent
Regulation 29 professional body, if any.
(2) All other persons appearing before the Authority shall be properly
dressed.
Prohibition of No person shall be allowed to bring mobile phones, sticks, arms or other
arms, mobile weapons in the room where the Authority conducts the proceedings.
phones etc.-
Regulation 30.
6. Settlement Commission
Particulars Service Tax Excise Customs
Application for 1. An assessee may, in respect of a case relating to him, make an
Settlement application, before adjudication, to the Settlement Commission to have
Commission – the case settled,
Section 32E 2. The application must contain a full and true disclosure of:
(Under Customs
law – Section (a) His duty liability which has not been disclosed before the Central
127B) Excise Officer having jurisdiction or proper officer, the manner in
which such liability has been derived,
(b) The additional amount of excise duty / customs duty accepted to
be payable by him; and
(c) Such other particulars as may be prescribed including the
particulars of such excisable goods in respect of which he admits
short levy on account of misclassification, under-valuation,
inapplicability of exemption notification or CENVAT credit or
otherwise;
(d) Under customs law - the particulars of such dutiable goods in
respect of which he admits short levy on account of
misclassification, under-valuation or inapplicability of exemption
notification or otherwise;
3. No application shall be made unless,—
(a) the applicant has filed returns showing production,
clearance and central excise duty paid in the prescribed
manner;
(b) a show-cause notice for recovery of duty issued by the
Central Excise Officer has been received by the applicant;
(c) the applicant has filed a bill of entry, or a shipping bill, or a
bill of export, or made a baggage declaration, or a label or
declaration accompanying the goods imported or exported
through post or courier, as the case may be, and in relation
Form and (1) An application under shall be made in the Form SC(ST)-1; SC(E)-1.
Manner of (2) The application referred to in sub-rule (1), the verification contained
Application – therein and all relevant documents accompanying such application shall
Rule 4 of Central be signed by the authorised person;
Excise (3) Every application shall be filed in quintuplicate and shall be
(Settlement accompanied by a fee of one thousand rupees.
cases) Rules (4) The additional amount of excise duty accepted by the applicant, along
2007. with interest due thereon, shall be deposited by him in any of the
authorized bank under TR-6 challan in quintuplicate.
Fee for Copies Section 32J of the Central Excise Act provides for inspection of reports
of reports – Rule made by Central Excise officers to the Settlement Commission on the
6 of Central basis of an application along with payment of fees. This rule provides
Excise that the fee for this purpose shall be INR5/page of the report.
(Settlement
cases) Rules
2007.
Preparation of (1) If the applicant or the Commissioner, as the case may be, proposes to
paper books etc. refer or rely upon any documents or statements or other papers, he may
– Rule 6 submit six copies of a paper book containing such papers duly indexed
and paged within seven days from the date of issuance of notice;
Provided that if the Commission is satisfied that there is sufficient reason
for delay, it may condone the delay and admit the paperbook.
(2) If the applicant proposes to refer to or rely upon any documents or
statements or other papers during the course of hearing, the applicant
may submit six copies of a paper book containing such papers duly
indexed and paged, within thirty days or within such extended period as
may be allowed by the Commission.
(3) The Commission may, suomotu, direct the preparation of six copies of
a paperbook by and at the cost of the applicant or the Commissioner,
containing copies of such statements, documents and papers, as it may
consider necessary for the proper disposal of the settlement application
on or matters arising therefrom.
(4) The paperbook must be legibly written or type-written in double space
or printed. If xerox copy of the document is filed, then the same should be
legible. Each paper should be certified as a true copy by the party filing
the same and indexed in such a manner as to give a brief description of
the documents, with page numbers and the authority before whom it was
filed.
Filing of Where a fact which is not borne out by or is contrary to the record relating
Affidavit – Rule to the case, is alleged in the settlement application, it shall be stated
7 clearly and concisely and supported by a duly sworn affidavit.
No revision if (a) the time for appeal against the order has not expired; or the matter has
been subject to an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal or a revision in the
High Court.
(b) more than four years have expired after the passing of the order sought
to be revised.
Period The JC shall pass order within a The Additional Commissioner or the
period of one year from the date of Commissioner may pass an order,
initiation of proceeding or calling for as the case may be, on any point
the records which has not been raised and
decided in an appeal or revision,
before the expiry of a period of one
year from the date of the order in
such appeal or revision or before
the expiry of a period of four years,
whichever is later.
Procedure The JC / Ad.C/ Commissioner may, if necessary, stay the operation of the
order for such period as he deems fit and after giving the person concerned
an opportunity of being heard and after making or causing to be made
such inquiry as he deems necessary, pass such order thereon as the
circumstances of the case justify, including an order enhancing or
modifying the assessment, or cancelling the assessment and directing the
fresh assessment.
of the assessment, or order or decision, as the case may be, the objection
and any other document or information as may be relevant.And where the
person aggrieved, requests a hearing in person, the person shall be
afforded an opportunity to be heard in person.
3. Where a person has requested a hearing and the person fails to
attend the hearing at the time and place stipulated, the Commissioner shall
proceed and determine the objection in the absence of the person.
4. Within three months after the receipt of the objection, the
Commissioner shall either – (a) accept the objection in whole or in part and
take appropriate action to give effect to the acceptance (including the
remission of any penalty assessed either in whole or in part); or (b) refuse
the objection or the remainder of the objection, as the case may be; and in
either case, serve on the person objecting, a notice in writing of the
decision and the reasons for it, including a statement of the evidence on
which it is based.
5. Where the Commissioner within three months of the making of the
objection notifies the person in writing, he may continue to consider the
objection for a further period of two months. Also the person may, in
writing, request the Commissioner to delay considering the objection for a
period of up to three months for the proper preparation of its position, in
which case the period of the adjournment shall not be counted towards the
period by which the Commissioner shall reach his decision.
6. Where the Commissioner has not notified the person of his decision
within the time, the person may serve a written notice requiring him to
make a decision within fifteen days.
7. If the decision has not been made by the end of the period of fifteen
days after being given the notice, then, at the end of that period, the
Commissioner shall be deemed to have allowed the objection.
Section 79- Bar No objection or appeal shall lie against –
on appeal or (a) a decision of the Commissioner to make an assessment of tax or
objection penalty;
against certain (b) a notice requiring a person to furnish a return;
orders (c) a notice issued for audit, special audit and inspection of records;
(d) a decision of the Commissioner to notify any matter;
(e) a notice asking a dealer to show cause why he should not be
prosecuted for an offence under this Act;
(f) a decision relating to the seizure or retention of books of account,
registers and other documents;
(g) a decision sanctioning a prosecution under the Act;
(h) an interim decision made in the course of any proceedings;
(c) Pass such other order for the determination of the issue as it thinks
fit:
6. The Appellate Tribunal shall give reasons in writing for its decision
which shall include its findings on material questions of fact and the
evidence or other material on which those findings were based.
7. The Appellate Tribunal shall use its best endeavours to make a final
resolution of the matter before it and for this purpose may make a decision
in substitution for the order in dispute, including the exercise or re-exercise
of any discretion or power vested in the Commissioner.
8. The Appellate Tribunal shall not set aside an assessment and remit
the matter to the Commissioner for a further assessment, unless it has
first-
(a) Advised the aggrieved person of the proposed order;
(b) Offered the person the opportunity to adduce such further evidence
before it as might assist the Appellate Tribunal to reach a final
determination.
9. Where the Appellate Tribunal sets aside an assessment and remits
the matter to the Commissioner for a further assessment, the Appellate
Tribunal shall at the same time order the Commissioner to refund to the
person some or all of the amount in dispute:
10. Where no order is made, it shall be presumed that the Appellate
Tribunal has ordered the refund of the amount in dispute.
11. Where a person has failed to attend the hearing at the time and
place stipulated, the Appellate Tribunal may adjourn the proceedings,
strike out the appeal or proceed to make an order determining the objection
in the absence of the person.
12. The Appellate Tribunal may rectify any mistake or error apparent
from the record of its proceedings.
13. Any order passed by the Appellate Tribunal may be reviewed suo-
motu or upon an application made in that behalf Provided that before any
order which is likely to affect any person adversely is passed, such person
shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
8.4 Revision Powers
Particulars Provisions
Section 74A
Revision w.r.t After any order (including an order under this section) or any decision in
objection is passed under the Act, rules or notifications made thereunder,
by any officer or person subordinate to him, the Commissioner may, of his
own motion or upon information received by him, call for the recordof such
1. Introduction
Conveying information that is adequate to state a fact or observation or question about an
action taken or anticipated without deficiency or overuse of words is a skill that will come by
practice. However, this chapter lays down the variants that may be at play in communicating
with various authorities in indirect tax laws.
Drafting refers to the manner of presenting / communicating that best fulfills the twin
objectives of ‘audience’ and ‘message’. That is, the communication must be commensurate
with the office of its recipient in language, detail and precision while passing on the desired
understanding in its essence and form for verification.
Pleading means a plaint or a written statement. Understanding these requires a detailed study
of this subject but broadly refers to the precise and purposive writing of the communication
where only relevant facts are brought into consideration seeking a particular action by the
addressee. Any relief sought in a departmental communication is with a purpose for seeking
exercise of authority vested with the addressee based on facts or data supplied. Hence, clarity
in communication is imperative.
Communication in general must convey:
(a) Clear and unambiguous statement of facts about the assessee or transaction;
(b) Polite yet firm statement of assessee’s position about any, direct or indirect, assertion;
(c) Awareness of the limits to the power to seek information and the extent of duty to
supply the same;
(d) Transparency about availability of documents and the contemporaneous nature; and
(e) Promptness in being available or accessible to attend to requirements.
2. Investigation
By its very nature, investigation is secretive as to the ‘object and reason for ‘suspicion’.
Confidential, yes, but conveys a certain degree of mutual lack of confidence between the
investor and the investigated. That one cannot be made a witness against himself is not a
one-way street because the investigation cannot be compromised by allowing the person
investigated to supply evasive response.
Correspondence received from investigating authorities is generally brief and seeks large
number of documents and records. Refusing to supply information attracts punitive provisions
and it is not offensive to express inability to prepare new information not ordinarily available
Drafting and Pleadings 71
Illustration 37:
“To,
……..
With reference to your above referred letter, we have been directed to prepare and provide the
following information:
a) Sales register in respect of sales contracts concluded in each office of the Company
within the State of …..
b) Details of Cenvat credit availed segregated based on payment made from each bank
account of the Company for the period …..
c) …..
In view of the fact that the said information is not required to be maintained by us in
accordance with the extant Rules under Service Tax or other applicable law(s), we do not
have the processes to capture this information and regrettably we do not have the said
information prepared contemporaneously. Hence, we are unable to reliably prepare and
provide the same for verification.
…….”
3. Audit
Audit is undertaken based on certain criteria such as revenue or risk in a unit and
departmental officers perform the audit. Sometimes audit is conducted by the CAG or special
audit is conducted at the behest of the department by CAs. Audit as envisaged under the
Chartered Accountant’s Regulations is distinct and cannot be used as an appropriate
comparison to appreciate the nature of this exercise undertaken by departmental audit
officers.
It is usual to receive request for information in standardized forms / formats. Hence, it is
important to bear in mind that the response must be in line with the information available in
returns filed and annual financial statements. For example, where AS-7 is followed for
reporting revenues in financial statements, it is not acceptable that reconciliation is not
available with the value of taxable services disclosed in ST3 returns.
The scope of an audit correspondence may be bifurcated into two parts:
(a) Categorization of transaction for purposes of levy of service tax – here contractual
arrangements are inquired into and copies of agreements / contracts are called for to verify
the tax positions followed. As regards, general business overview or any equivalent non-
specific language used to seek information that categorizes the business operations, it is
important to ensure that in the enthusiasm to provide such information the note / submission
does not travel beyond the scope of the words used in actual agreements / contracts. Use of
sweeping description can lead to misunderstanding or misinterpretation. It is advisable to
restrict the information to words from contracts or tax positions determined after internal
consultations.
Illustration 38:
“General Business Overview
The Company is engaged in the business:
Not Advisable Suggested Alternative
..…of software development and …..of information technology software
customization, sale of software licenses of its services and trading of goods (packaged
own products namely, ………. and annual software, namely, …..)
maintenance contracts
…..of real estate development …..of works contracts for construction of
residential apartment under a scheme
involving transfer of undivided share of land
(owned and otherwise) along with amenities
and facilities
…..of operating restaurant …..of operating air-conditioned restaurant
serving food and non-alcoholic drinks and
outdoor catering services
…..of operating dealership of XYZ (brand) …..of trading of goods (motor cars and parts)
cars including service station as authorized dealer and providing
maintenance and repair services
4. Adjudication
While it is in one sense correspondence, more precise expressions are employed to describe
correspondence with adjudicating authorities. Interaction with an adjudicating authority has the
show cause notice as the starting point. Not only that, the SCN provides the framework or
boundaries for correspondence.
Show cause notice must be met with a reply that may be filed by the Noticee or a duly
authorized representative. The authority to appoint a representative is a statutory right and the
law lays down a list of qualifications that such a representative needs to possess in order to
be eligible to provide such representation.
Reply to a show cause notice must contain the following parts:
(a) Background facts relating to the Noticee;
(b) Identification of facts and facts-in-issue to point to the purpose of the SCN;
(c) Preliminary objections concerning the SCN – authority and jurisdiction, timing and valid
service and request for adjournment;
(d) Clear statement of acceptance or rejection, wholly or in part, of each para(s) forming the
issues raised in the SCN. Arguments, corroborative or rebuttal evidence and supporting
decisions need to be provided;
(e) Alternative plea may also be contained in order to rebut the issues raised in the SCN;
and
(f) Prayer containing the nature of relief sought including whether opportunity for personal
hearing is required or waived.
Illustration 40:
“OPENING WORDS (IN REPLY TO SCN) AGAINST EACH REBUTTAL PARA –
Without prejudice and in addition to the foregoing………..”
Illustration 41:
“CONCLUDING (IN REPLY TO SCN) AGAINST EACH REBUTTAL PARA –
………..for these reasons the demand in para no. ……… of the impugned notice is liable to be
set aside as being unlawful and contrary to facts which the Noticee vehemently objects and
rejects in totality.”
Illustration 42:
“MAKING REFERENCE TO PARAS IN ORDER APPEALED AGAINST –
…….the learned Assistant Commissioner has extracted para no…….. in internal page no…….
of the Intelligence Report and reproduced it in para no…….. at page no…… of the impugned
order that……”
Illustration 43:
“CONCLUDING PARA IN REPLY IN THE FORM OF PRAYER –
In view of the foregoing, the Noticee prays that:
a) Su ppression alleged in the impugned notice may be dropped as
unsubstantiated
b) Demand for service tax in para no……. of impugned notice may be dropped as barred
by limitation / not sustainable in law
c) Demand for consequent interest may also be dropped
d) Demand for penalty is liable to be set aside
Noticee further craves leave to furnish additional grounds or amend any or all of the grounds
setout herein as may be necessary to support contentions raised herein and seeks opportunity
to be heard in person through authorized signatory.”
5. Revisionary Authority
Power of revision is a supervisory power conferred by statute to inquire into the propriety of
orders passed by any specified authority. Correspondence with revisionary authority occurs
when opportunity is being given to the Noticee before passing adverse orders.
The fact that such a revisionary proceeding is initiated itself indicates that the underlying order
is considered to be warranting re-examination on some ground. Hence, it is important for such
Noticee to ensure accuracy of facts being referred or relied upon. And correspondence may be
directed towards:
(a) Firstly, ensure correctness and completeness of information being considered in the
proceedings and
(b) Secondly, ensure all judicial precedents holding field on a given date are supplied to the
authority carrying out these proceedings
7. Settlement Commission
Commission is a forum where the tax department does not have any representation. It is the
Applicant who is to make a truthful and voluntary disclosure of the admitted amount of dues
with an unconditional undertaking to pay these admitted dues in exchange for immunity from
prosecution. Hence, the nature of the underlying cause for non-payment of dues is one which
imminently attracts prosecution.
Given the nature of remedy sought, the application must be simple and clear in stating the
facts. Further, securing decision by misleading the Commission has very severe
consequences. In such a case, the decision will be revoked, erstwhile proceedings that were
halted will be resumed and the time lost in approaching the Commission until discovery of
such deception will be excluded in calculating the applicable limitation.
8. Appeal
While provisions of CPC do not apply to appeal proceedings before statutory authorities such
as Joint Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal, it is important to fully grasp
the Appellate Procedure Rules that are prescribed by the statute. Diligence in the adherence
to the form and presentation is essential.
Format prescribed may be referred from the statute. It is important to note that the appellate
authority’s familiarity with the form of appeal guides them to look for relevant information in
specific columns or pages in this form. Hence, strict adherence to the prescribed form is
essential.
Completeness is also of equal importance where the different parts of the form of appeal such
as facts, grounds, prayer and verification arenot deviated from. Deviation can be fatal to the
appeal itself.
Well- drafted appeal does not mean a very lengthy appeal. In fact, it is encouraging to note
that under Income-tax law, e-filing of appeals has just commenced where there are limits to
the number of words for each of these parts. Hence, the area of skill in filing appeal is not in
elaborate language but in precision without leaving out any potential ground for substantiating
the relief prayed for.
Illustration 44:
“……..the learned Commissioner has permitted himself to be misled by relying upon unverified
information that is nothing more than hearsay and as such reached an erroneous finding at
para no….. of the impugned order which is unlawful and for this reason the demand for tax
deserves to be set aside.”
Illustration 45:
“……..the impugned order is not legal and proper in as much as it seeks to regard the services
rendered by the Appellant tax contrary to the express language of rule ….. by introducing
extra-legislative tests and criteria not contained in the extant Rules and thereby performing
great injustice against the Appellant which does not enjoy legislative sanction or pleasure of
support from authority of judicial pronouncements holding field and for this reason the demand
for tax deserves to be set aside.”
Illustration 46:
“…having cited a circular issued by the Board as to the interpretation that the words in rule …..
are to be supplied and to this end, the impugned order demonstrates eagerness to fasten
unsubstantiated liability and a pre-determined mind which is violative of principles of natural
justice and for this reason the demand for tax deserves to be set aside.”
9. Additional Evidence
Evidence is that which advances the cause asserted by the Appellant. Appellant is free to
mount a barrage of evidence that may prevail upon the Appellate Authority. Use of additional
evidence must not appear to exhaust the Authority. Instead, it must be such that each one of
them throws new light or advances the case asserted by the Appellant.
Appeal is a process of visualizing the ‘reasons’ for the ‘actions’ charged to have or ought not
to have taken place. Availability of evidence only supports the imagination of the Authority to
reach a substantial conclusion about the events that have occurred in the past.
12. Formats
All documents are to be in clear and legible font with adequate margin and line spacing. One-
inch margin and double-line spacing on legal-size paper is a safe format to follow. Relevant
Procedure Rules of the Appellate forum may be referred.
All submissions are to be bound with index and page numbering legibly marked uniformly in all
copies. Where documents are voluminous, the same may be separated into multiple volumes
marked distinctly but with continuity in the page numbers.
13. Do’s
(a) Always ask for written requests before submitting any information and collect
acknowledgement for written replies submitted.
(b) While filing enclosures, identify the same with description in the title of the document. If
there are too many enclosures, then pagination and indexing it is advisable to facilitate
quick reference.
(c) Record the ‘date of service’ of every communication including notice or order(s)
received from the tax department. If it is not available, it can be sourced under right to
information law.
(d) Address all communication to the specific authority and provide relevant references of
documents, letters, visits, etc., that ‘this communication is in relation to or is in
furtherance of…….’.
(e) Provide written communication in case of change of address for serving notice during
the course of any proceeding by letter or a specific application.
(f) Ensure politeness in all communications with tax authorities. Politeness does not mean
reverence to the authority because as an authorized representative, loyalty is towards
the law and not to the officer enforcing or administering the law.
(g) When extracts of statutory provision arebeing submitted, ensure that photocopy from an
official publication is provided and not a print-out of a reproduced version from a
computer. Photocopy from an official publication displays authenticity.
(h) Subscribe to more than one law journal for reference including electronic versions.
(i) Develop and maintain a good library in the office.
(j) Before citing any authority ensure that it is current and has not been overruled by a
superior authority / Court.
14. Don’ts
(a) Do not deviate from prescribed forms and formats. Use additional enclosures to submit
charts and pictorial presentation of relevant information / data
(b) Do not forget to do page numbering after printing and binding the final version of
documents and submissions to tax authorities
(c) If any information is not available, make a clear statement to this effect and do not offer
any alternatives because it dilutes the clarity about the earlier statement – that the said
information is not available
(d) Do not make spelling mistakes in the title / designation of authorities before whom
submissions are being made
(e) Avoid using short forms / acronyms for the title of any authority such as ‘Supdt.’ for
Superintendent, ‘AC’ for Assistant Commissioner, etc. Instead, refer to their full and
complete title.
(f) As an authorized representative, do not encourage telephonic communication with the
office of any adjudicating or appellate authority. Client is free to maintain telephonic
contact with jurisdictional / range authorities
(g) Do not allow typographical errors in statements or replies
(h) Do not submit incomplete or erroneous enclosures to be including in the submissions
(i) As a practitioner, do not discard books / publications of Act and Rules when the next
year’s publications are notified. In representation matters, reference is to be made to
the law ‘as it then was’ and not as on the date of current proceedings
undertaken on behalf of the Company by various third parties. Cost of feasibility studies is
shared with ……. who is an associate concern.”
(c) Caustic remarks – However much the order passed may cause grief to the assessee,
there is no justification formaking caustic remarks against the said authority in appellate
submissions.
Illustration 49:
“PERSONAL AND UNCHARITABLE REMARKS –
………..in so doing the learned Commissioner has taken leave of his senses and made a
mockery of the discretion vested in him under ….. rule of ….. Act ……………”
1. Appearance
Appearance before Government / departmental authorities, is an art and one of the most
important functions in any litigation proceedings. It requires skills that showcase the grasp of
knowledge about the law on a particular matter and the understanding of the facts of the case.
With practice, one can express this art skillfully. While a well prepared ground can ease the
task of the person representing; the representation skills are often brought to test when either
the grounds are weak or lack precedence or can be decided eitherway.
Appearance, either as appellant, or as a respondent, is a formal representation on behalf of
the client in the proceeding before the adjudicating authority/appellate authority so as to lend
assistance in discovering the facts and the interpretation of law and the application of law to
the facts of the case. The outcome is a by-product of this exercise.
Depending on the matter, an appearance, may be before:
(a) Departmental authority, that is, pursuant to a notice issued by the lower authority which
considers that the assessee has either not paid or short paid any tax, interest or penalty
due to the Government and who has either issued a show cause notice or desires to
issue a show cause notice
(b) Appellate Authority such as Commissioner (Appeals), where an adjudicating order has
been passed and the assessee is aggrieved.
(c) Tribunal, where the order is passed by any lower authority in adjudicatory or appellate
proceedings, or in case of a departmental appeal, as respondent.
(d) Appropriate High Court or the Supreme Court of India.
3. Dress code
The dress code for appearance by an authorized representative is prescribed only for
appearances before Tribunal. The recommended dress code for representation is given in the
table below:
Represented Prescribed dress code Recommended dress code
before
Departmental Not specified Recommended to be formal
Authority
Commissioner Not specified Recommended to be formal
(Appeals)
Tribunal In terms of Rule 48 of Customs, When representing in person:
Excise and Service Tax Appellate Formal dress.
Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982:
If prescribed by Professional body When representing by authorized
to which the representative is representative: as prescribed.
attached, the said prescribed dress
code, else:
(i) For a male: A close-collared
black coat, or in an open-collared
black coat, with white shirt and
black tie;
(ii) For a female: A black coat over
a white sari or any other white
dress
(c) Know the adjudicating / appellate authorities – this may be done by reading about his /
her previous judgments, if any. This would give the person appearing a better
perspective of the authorities and would aid in representing in a manner the authorities
would understand or get convinced;
(d) Visit the location of the hearing before the actual date of hearing, to familiarize yourself
with the place;
(e) Review the file, to acquaint yourself with the facts and legal grounds taken;
(f) Check for judicial decisions not considered earlier and having relevance to the matter.
It is advisable to have printed copies of the judicial decisions relied upon and in case
the same are to be presented, sufficient copies be made available to the adjudicating
authorities and the other party;
(g) Prepare a summary / synopsis to be presented before the adjudicating authority/
appellate authority which will help them know about the entire case in about 3-4 pages.
This also saves time and gives all the parties involved a better understanding ofthe
facts of the case.
(h) Prepare short notes that would help you while appearing before the adjudicating
authority/ appellate authority
(b) In case the letter of authorization to represent the matter is not filed earlier, the same
may be provided to the court master to be placed in the file
(c) The members on the bench should be addressed as ‘My Lord’ or ‘Your Honour’.
(d) Parties must remain quiet so as not to disturb the hearing. Disrupting court hearings is a
contempt of court and can result in punishment.
(e) Stand whenever the members on the bench enter or leave the courtroom and bow your
head to acknowledge them.
General etiquettes:
(a) Smoking, eating, drinking or chewing gum is strictly not permitted;
(b) Audio or video recording or photography is not allowed;
(c) Usage of mobile phones is prohibited;
(d) Children under the age of 14 are not allowed in the courtroom unless they are present
to give evidence or have the court’s prior approval;
(e) While sitting in the court hall or before the adjudicating authority/ appellate authority, the
posture should be courteous. For instance, sitting with crossed legs may be taken as
being disrespectful to the authorities.
Illustration 51: Appellant submitted financial statements where loss was reported for two years
in a row in support of his claim for financial hardship. Appellate authority verified the balance
sheet and found that loans to related parties had been extended for a sufficient amount and
recognizing the financial hardship allowed stay application partially by directing the appellant
to deposit to the extent monies were advanced as loans to related parties.
Illustration 52: Appellant claimed financial hardship but the financial statements showed
profitability of the business. The CA representing the appellant stated that by being asked to
deposit the disputed amount, would cause financial distress to the operations. He supported
this submission with an elegant cash flow statement projecting the working capital implication
of making such a deposit. The Appellate Authority agreed with the submission and granted
absolute stay after making a statement that in view of the extent of ongoing Government
contracts, there was no apparent risk to recovery of dues, if eventually determined in favour of
revenue.
Illustration 53: Appellant praying for stay of recovery of demand had claimed financial hardship
along with corroborative evidence. During arguments, the CA showed that the case was
covered by a superior Court’s decision which had been followed by this forum in a number of
recent decisions. Appellate Authority allowed the stay application and as there was no
objection by the departmental Counsel, took up the appeal itself and disposed of it in the
interest of time and justice.
(ii) Early Hearing:
It would be important that the reasons for early hearing are clearly illustrated. The right to
grant early hearing would be that of the adjudicating authority/ appellate authority. Principally,
matters with high financial implications are not the only reasons for early hearing.
Illustration 54: Appellant filed application for early hearing stating that the stay application has
also not come up for hearing but the tax department has issued a letter to the bank asking for
‘blocking’ of funds in view of the adjudicating order that is currently in operation. Appellate
authority took exception to this revenue recovery tactic and allowed the early hearing
application and directed the Registry to bring the stay application. Appellate authority heard
the stay application in the afternoon session and passed stay orders noting that such
aggressive measures were unwarranted and showeddisrespect tothe Appellate Authority who
is yet to hear the stay application. Factors like stakes involved, other similar matters,
availability of precedents, and recurring nature of the issue are considered while granting early
hearing.
Illustration 55: Appellant filed application for early hearing of application stating that appeal
along with stay application has been filed; however the time limit stated in the adjudicating
order for payment of disputed tax is about to expire and that the Appellant is apprehensive
that the tax authorities may take aggressive recovery action. Appellate authority assured the
Appellant that when the stay application is pending, the tax authorities will not take any
recovery action. They will wait for disposal of the stay application and directed the
departmental Counsel to taken note of this confidence that the Appellate Authority is reposing
in the tax authorities. After making these observations, the early hearing application was
dismissed as unsubstantiated apprehension without any real evidence and as such
unwarranted.
(iii) Clubbing:
Similar matters may be prayed to the adjudicating authority/appellate authority to be clubbed
for hearing. In case the matters in different appeal have common cause, the adjudicating
authority/appellate authority may list the same together for speedy disposal. This would also
reduce the litigation costs.
Illustration 56: Appellant filed application for clubbing of multiple appeals involving
substantially similar questions. Appellate authority heard the application but found that only
some of the questions were similar and recognized that there were other significant dissimilar
issues and by clubbing the various appeals, there would be occasion to attend to the
dissimilar issues out of turn. As such, the application was dismissed as rejected.
Illustration 57: Appellant filed application for clubbing of multiple appeals involving
substantially similar questions. Appellate authority heard the application and though other
dissimilar issues were present, they were not substantial and as such allowed the application
as the substantial questions involved in all appeals being identical merited consideration
together.
Illustration 58: Appellant filed application for clubbing of multiple appeals where some were
cross-appeals and some were appeals by Appellant. Appellate authority heard and allowed the
application so that appeals by Appellant and Department could receive consideration together.
(iv) Condonation of delay:
Filing an appeal within time is a limitation provided in the law for seeking redressal and the
condonable period is ordinarily stated. In case of delay, the applicant will have to provide for
reasons that account for the delay and in the event the adjudicating authority/ appellate
authority considers the same to be fit for condonation and is within the extendable period, the
matter subject to the satisfaction of the adjudicating authority/appellate authority, is
condonable. The applicant will have to bring a strong case for condonation. The application
should also be supported by an affidavit and other documentary evidence.
There may also be delay in filing departmental appeals, which are viewed little more leniently
due to government procedures/processes involved in seeking approval for filing and other
administrative reasons. Condonation is not a matter of right. Sometimes costs are imposed by
the Tribunal and Court for entertaining a condonation application.
Illustration 59: Appellant filed application for condonation of delay of more than 1000 days and
explained that being a PSU, they required clearance to file the appeal from their Committee of
Disputes. When the Appellate Authority found that the case each day of delay was explained
and if the time taken by the Committee were excluded, the Appellant had filed the appeal in
time, and the application was allowed. The CA for the Appellant made successful submissions
on the strong prima facie merits of the case and the Appellate Authority noted that need to do
justice on the merits of the case further supported condonation of delay.
Illustration 60: Appellant filed application for condonation of 200 days’ delay before First
Appellate Authority where the condonable delay was 180 days and due to bona fide reasons
the Appellant was prevented from filing appeal within this extended time limit. The First
Appellate Authority dismissed the application and also the appeal also stating the there is no
statutory power to condone delay beyond the time limit of 180 days. Delay of 200 days being
beyond the statutory time limit for condonation, even though the cause for delay is genuine
and verifiable, the law does not vest the First Appellate Authority with the power to condone.
Illustration 61: An appeal was filed in respect of dismissal of the condonation application and
the appeal itself (as in the above illustration) before the Second Appellate Authority. In law,
the Second Appellate Authority has power to condone delay and there is no upper limit for the
extent of delay that can be condoned. The Second Appellate Authority found that this appeal
was filed in time and held that the scope of the second appeal is to inquire into the propriety of
the order of the First Appellate Authority and not to entertain appeal against the adjudication
order passed originally. As such this appeal was dismissed by the Second Appellate Authority
stating that there was nothing improper in the order passed by the First Appellate Authority.
Appellant was left to consider whether writ petition can be filed against the order of the
Second Appellate Authority in view of the merits of the case having never come up for
consideration and that justice eluded the Appellant on account of technicalities of procedure.
Appellant was relying upon decisions in Orient Syntex Ltd. v. AC-CE 1990 (47) ELT 321
(Bom.) and Zafarullah v. CC 1992 (60) ELT 263 (Trib.)
(v) Regular hearing:
Ordinarily, there are no limitations on time for presenting the arguments at regular hearings.
This is for the reason that the adjudicating authority/ appellate authority provides full
opportunity to the parties to present their version in a manner, which enables justice to prevail.
However, we need to value the time of the adjudicating authority/appellate authority and the
matter presented would need to be precise and adequate as the context requires.
(b) Start with your hearing by addressing the bench ‘Your Honour’ and state in brief the
matter before the adjudicating authority/ appellate authority
Illustration 62: The CA for an Appellant opened his submissions by stating “Your Honour, the
facts of the case are covered by decision in the case of …….”. The Bench replied “So, do you
mean to say that you will not bother to explain the facts to us and want us to take your word
for it and allow your appeal?” and the Bench added “Kindly, submit the facts and also show us
how your facts are covered by the decision in the case of ….. which you are seeking to rely
upon. We will then be able to apply our minds to that question and if it is in fact true and
acceptable in our view, we will pass an equitable order”. The CA quickly retraced his steps
and made his submissions and the Bench eventually ruledin favour of the Appellant.
(j) Never interrupt an adjudicating authority/ appellate authority. This may annoy the
adjudicating authority/ appellate authority and adversely impact his / her perception
(k) In case where the respondent is presenting his version of the matter, allow him to
complete his / her submission and in case you desire to intervene, the permission of the bench
is to be sought before countering the respondent’s arguments
(l) In case the matter is posted for another date, the record of the next hearing be made as
the bench may not serve a notice considering that the date has been communicated in person
during the proceedings
(m) Whenever matters are heard partly, it would be important to summarize the submissions
made in the previous hearing before proceeding with the fresh submissions
(n) In case of pass-over of the matter for specified reason, it is important to adhere to the
same before the appointed time
(o) In case the bench or adjudicating authority/ appellate authority has sought compliance
to any stipulation such as pre-deposit or providing of evidence, the same be made before the
appointed date and in case otherwise, permission of the adjudicating authority/ appellate
authority besought.
(p) While concluding the submissions, you may state as “Your Honour if there are no
further questions, I would like now to close submission and thank the bench for the attention”
(q) The CA should keep all relevant documents, statutory provisions, circulars and case
laws, which he intends to rely upon during arguments. A compilation of such documents with
proper indexation is preferable and adequate number of copies should be available
(r) It is important to use appropriate language, which is polite, humble and draws the
needed attention. Depending on the situation, one may consider using the following terms:
I would like to emphasize that...
If I may draw your attention to the fact that...
I submit that....
As already pointed out...
As a consequence...
Let me quote the words of...
It is a rule that...
With your permission, I doubt that the revenue would accept...
I would like to explain why...
With your permission, I quote...
The principles we invoke, etc.
I respectfully disagree with the learned respondent…
1. Introduction
The purpose of enriching one’s knowledge is to bring justice to a client who is neither obliged
to pay excessive or higher taxes nor unlawfully lower than what is imposed under the law.
While ethics and integrity serve as guiding principles of the role one adores, etiquette is the
tool at one’s disposal in effectively discharging that role.
This chapter in sum is a recollection of visible signs that a learned member of this Institute has
come to personify. A few areas where this recollection may be required are briefly discussed.
2. Code of Conduct
All members are required to refer to an updated publication of ICAI Code of Ethics to be
mindful of the continuous recommendations brought about by the Ethical Standards Board
(www.esb.icai.org). Code of conduct not only refers to the written code but also the underlying
essence that serves as a guide post for conducting oneself as a member of this august
Institution.
Conduct as it is said is contagious and articled assistants and new members learn by watching
other members. It helps the process of training if the considerations weighing on the various
decisions being taken are shared transparently. Code of conduct is both the written and
practiced approach in the course of work that is chosen as a path to follow. It comprises
various aspects from knowledge to methodology.
3. Knowledge
Knowledge is gained continuously - some from books and some from observing those
exercising its teachings. Those who produce work of great skill and expertise have long been
contemplating every interpretation that a provision may expose itself to. A client’s engagement
only provides an opportunity and create an occasion to display and put into action the
expertise and experience gathered by a practitioner over a long period of time involving study,
observations and assimilation of knowledge.
Reading and updating is a sign of being ‘teachable’ or ‘coachable’ and those who have worked
closely with some of our members who are acclaimed in their field of expertise would agree
that such members are found to spend greater number of hours on this aspect than a fresher.
Embracing technology to access most recent information advances the cause of Clients by
allowing you to placehands on most current decisions or changes in law.
Knowledge is valuable when shared. Hence, develop an environment of learning and
imparting the learning to all associates even if it is expected that someof them may leave the
92 Background Material on Litigation Management
firm. Plagiarizing is self-humiliation. Those who leave the firm with the knowledge gained go
on to become ambassadors in the world. Hence, it is advisable to be magnanimous in
imparting knowledge to all who can embrace it.
5. Integrity
This is an overused expression but is visible and apparent in day- to- day practice. Clients
seeking representational assistance always believe they are right and come with an
expectation of a favourable outcome immediately. A member well-entrenched in litigation
services knows the value of setting right expectations and where deserving, advise Clients to
accept the tax demanded. In his /her zeal to serve more clients, a CA should not give any
false assurance or fail to indicate the serious impediments in a case. Service of a member in
litigation is not just to support the cause of the Client but maintain unbiased loyalty to the law
and not to the litigating parties.
6. Methodology
This refers to an organized, systematic and predictable manner of undertaking work and
carrying it out until completion. One possible methodology could include the following:
(a) Documented approach
(b) Objective assessment of facts (or case)
(c) Transparency in process-of-law
(d) Disclosure of all submissions
(e) Regular communication of progress
(f) Prompt attendance to case
(g) Handing over documents and orders
Setting unrealistic expectations or supporting unsubstantiated tax positions is one of the key
areas where members need to be firm and objective. If surgery is necessary, medicines will
not suffice.
Meticulousness is not an act but a habit. It cannot be found in certain areas,andmissing in
others. Ensure consistency in being meticulous in all areas of Client handling. Convene
meeting with Clients with both a ‘start’ and an ‘end’ time. Have an agenda for discussion or
interviewing for preparation in a case. Regularly update Client about the progress including
where there may be long intervals of time when no update is available.
Clients come with their experience with other experts and hence this requires to be reset /
realigned and it may be necessary to educate them about the approach that they should
expect. In all new relationships, this must be started immediately so that there is no confusion
or gap due to no fault of either party.
7. Do’s
(a) Obtain written mandate for all representational engagements with specific reference to
the period of dispute or notice. Hence, develop standard mandate forms / templates
(b) In case of bona fide tax default, advise admission of default availing concessional
penalty instead of pursing litigation. The possibility of approaching the Settlement
Commissioner could also be explored
(c) Follow all amendments/changes in law closely
(d) Develop and preserve good library of reference material and commentaries
(e) Maintain continuity of subscription to journals
(f) Verify print out with authenticated version of law or decision before using in
submissions
(g) Encourage associates to be present during hearings, if permitted, to witness
proceedings ‘live’
(h) Maintain case-file and supply copies of all notices and submissions to Client
(i) Maintain acknowledgement of filing of copies of all appeals and submissions to
appellate authority and departmental representation
(j) Maintain respectful arm’s length distance fromdepartment representatives and staff in
Registry
(k) Verify cause-list hosted in website of CESTAT or VAT Tribunal regularly to avoid ex
parte disposal of matters
(l) Ensure prompt and reliable process of receiving notices and intimation at office that
reaches the member representing the Client. Large establishment are likely to have
mis-delivery within the office
(m) Adjournment applications to be filed as early as the intimation of hearing is served
(n) Carry books / journals to hearing and not just photo-copies. Photo-copies are for
submission
(o) Strive to make continuous improvements inthe representation style and approach
8. Don’ts
(a) Do not assume unwritten authorization to represent. Have standard form of ‘power of
attorney’
(b) Do not entertain requests to support unlawful tax positions
(c) Do not advise pursuit of litigation when deviation from law by Client is evident
(d) Do not skip reading and updating yourknowledge with latest decisions
1. Introduction
One of the key concerns of a tax management team in an organization is to avoid tax
disputes. A tax management team of an organization takes many steps to ensure that the
company does not get into tax disputes. However, even after adequate precautions and care
being taken, disputes may crop up, which may be mainly because of lack of clarity and
simplicity in the laws. Hence handling litigation assumes importance and the tax management
team in consultation with their Counsel would think of strategies to handle litigation, where the
pros and cons of litigating are analysed and the impact of outcome of litigation isalso weighed,
keeping in mind various factors like unique facts, availability of binding precedents, risk
involved, litigation costs, precedent value, time span etc.
Litigation strategy enables analysis of various factors, which enable arriving at a decision as to
whether to litigate a particular issue or not and to what extent. This exercise would give an
insight into the issue as well as information about the risks involved. It would serve as a tool
for the assessee to decide as to whether the matter shall be litigated or not. Some of the
factors considered are analysed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Also, as the quantum of tax payments increases over the years, it should be considered
common for tax authorities to review the returns filed and examine the tax positions taken,
particularly exemptions, concessions, deductions and tax credits. Hence, ongoing compliances
must be aligned to defend all possible questions that may be posed in any audit inquiry.
applicable from the next day itself. There could be instances where the department might be
referring to provisions or notifications, which may not be applicable to the period in dispute.
Hence the legal provisions on the basis of which the show cause notice has been issued shall
also be analyzed and understood as the department may invoke the wrong provisions.
(a) Payment of duty along with interest and availment of credit by the buyer of the
goods or recipient of service: Where the buyer is willing to accept the supplementary
bill for the services/goods and if the demand is not on account of invoking of extended
period of limitation (refer Rule 9(1)(bb) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004), the possibility of
using the credit by the buyer/service recipient could be explored..
(b) Settlement Commission: Where the issue cannot be contested on merits or the case
is weak on merits and limitation, then the option of going for settlement should be
considered instead of opting for the adjudication route.
(c) Writ: Where the demand appears to be patently wrong or beyond the scope or powers
of the issuing authority or if there is a requirement to challenge the legal provisions or
rule or notifications or circulars, then the client should be advised to file a Writ
challenging the show cause notice itself on lack of jurisdiction/competence or validity of
provisions invoked in the notice. This is because the adjudicating or appellate
authorities can only implement the law and cannot express their views on validity of
provisions/rules etc.
Illustration 68: Where the transaction is in the nature of sale of goods(fact is accepted by
department) and the department issues a notice proposing demand of service tax on such
transaction, challenge could be made before writ court
6. Revenue Neutrality
Revenue neutral situation arises when the tax (if paid) would be eligible for availment as credit
either by the person paying the tax or person who purchases/receives the goods or services.
The Revenue neutrality is also considered in the matter of invoking extended period of
limitation and imposing penalties.
8. Refund Matters
In cases involving refund, whether refund of duties or taxes excess paid or refund/rebate
arising out of export of goods or services (like cenvat refund/rebate of duty paid on inputs)
etc., the following aspects are to be considered:
(a) Compilation of the relevant documents and submission of such documents.
Obtain copy of SCN and check whether complete set of SCN along with documents relied
upon has been served by the Department. If the relied upon documents are not provided along
with SCN, write to the department asking them to make available the relied upon documents.
Obtain proof of the date of service of SCN. This would be useful for contesting the matter on
limitation, as the SCN should be issued in a time- bound manner.
Obtain complete set of correspondence between the client and department in connection with
the said issue or in connection with other issues but having impact on the current issue.
Understand the facts from the client, obtain (if necessary) documents such as agreements,
work orders, purchase orders, invoices etc.
Analyse and understand the facts, issues raised and quantifications in the show cause notice.
(a) Allegations in the SCN should be specific and not vague.
(b) It should be based on evidence and documents not on the basis of assumptions.
of receipt may have to be produced before the CESTAT or Commissioner (Appeals) while
filing the appeal.
Note that the Commissioner (Appeals) has limited powers to condone delay.
Summarize the order giving break up of demands confirmed (or refund rejected) and the
demand dropped.
Advise the client as to the options available where the demands are confirmed (or refunds are
rejected). Also inform the client on the time limitwithin which the appeal needs to be filed.
Based on the confirmation received from the client for filing of appeal, prepare the appeal by
considering the following aspects:
(a) Read through and understand provisions relating to appeal and the rules issued there
under.
(b) Appeal shall be filed in specific forms and format as notified. Select the proper form.
(c) If the appeal is being filed before the CESTAT, ensure that the appeal filing fee is
computed properly and demand draft for the same is submitted.
(d) Provide correct information as required under the form of appeal.
(e) Don’t leave any of the questions in the form unanswered.
(f) Prayer for grant of relief shall be specific.
(g) Verification shall be completed properly and signed by the authorised person
Drafting of appeal memorandum
(a) Give a brief background of the assessee and the issues involved.
(b) Chronological events prior to issue of SCN (if relevant) may be stated and the relevant
documents be enclosed.
(c) Summarize the allegations in the SCN, your reply and the findings in the impugned
order. Enclose copy of each of the document.
(d) Grounds of appeal:
(i) State the grounds of appeal in a precise and concise manner. Link such grounds
to the reply to show cause notice and the evidence relied upon, which apparently
was not considered in the impugned order.
(ii) Counter the findings of the respondent if he has dealt with the ground taken
before him. If the respondent has not dealt with such ground, state that the
respondent has not considered the said ground.
(iii) The findings in the order cannot traverse beyond the proposals in the SCN. In
case the order has made out a new case then it should be mentioned in the
grounds (Example: Allegation in the SCN that the services provided fall under
marketing services but the tax demand is confirmed under support services in the
order).
1. Introduction
This module on Mock Tribunal and Mock Appellate/Adjudication Proceedings is included in the
course to give the participants a feel of what happens, while representing a case before the
authority or Tribunal. Hence, it should be ensured that the logistics and format are as close to
that we come across in the Tribunal or before the authority.
2. Writ Jurisdiction
2.1 Writ has been defined as a written command or formal order issued by Court directing
person(s) to do or refrain from doing some act specified therein. The Constitution of India
provides writ jurisdiction under Article 32 and Article 226 for the enforcement of Fundamental
Rights and other legal remedies. A petitioner can approach Supreme Court under Article 32
and High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.
2.2 The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of
the rightsconferred by this Part is guaranteed. The Supreme Court shall have power to issue
directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of the following:
(a) Habeas Corpus: Habeas Corpus is a Latin term which means “you may have the body”.
108 Background Material on Litigation Management
The writ is issued to produce a person who has been detained, whether in prison or in
private custody, before a court and to release him if such detention is illegal. The writ
provides a prompt and effective remedy against illegal detention. The principal aim of
the writ is to ensure swift judicial review of alleged unlawful detention on liberty or
freedom of the prisoner or detenu.
(b) Mandamus: Mandamus is a Latin word, which means “We Command”. Mandamus is an
order from the Supreme Court or High Court to a Lower Court or Tribunal or public
authority to perform a public or statutory duty. The writ of mandamus would be to issue
an order to cancel an order of an administrative or statutory public authority or the
Government itself where it violates a fundamental right.
(c) Prohibition: The writ of prohibition means to forbid or to stop and it is popularly known
as ‘Stay order’. The writ of prohibition would be issue of order to prevent or prohibit a
quasi-judicial authority from proceeding to act in contravention of a fundamental right
such as ex-jurisdiction, violation of natural justice, unconstitutional etc. After the issue
of this writ, proceedings in the lower court etc. come to a stop.
(d) Certiorari: Certiorari means “to be certified”. The writ of certiorari can be issued by the
Supreme Court or any High court for quashing the order already passed by an inferior
court, tribunal or quasi- judicial authority.
(e) Quo Warranto: The word Quo Warranto means “what is your authority”. It is a writ
issued with a view to restrain a person from holding a public office to which he is not
entitled. The writ requires the concerned person to explain to the court by what authority
he holds the office.
2.3 In addition to the specific writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights and other
constitutional rights, a petition can also be filed in cases where the vires of the law has been
challenged or where the principal of natural justice has not been followed or against the
validity/enforceability of circular/rule/notification or against any order/notice issued without
jurisdiction or where the alternate remedy is inadequate. The writs are subjected to rejection
when any efficacious alternate remedy is available or if it involves a disputed question of fact.
2.4 There is no prescribed time limit for filing writ petition in the Supreme Court or High
Court. However, writ can be dismissed on grounds of unreasonable delay.
2.5 Only the person aggrieved can file a writ in the Supreme Court or Jurisdictional High
Court. However public interest litigation or enforcement of habeas corpus or quo warrantoare
some exceptions where writ can be filed other than the aggrieved person.
3. General Clauses
3.1 Any exercise on interpretation of law is incomplete without due consideration being
given to the provisions of General Clauses Act, 1897. States too have their own laws on
General Clauses. This Act provides the ‘rules’ for interpretation and the provisions of this Act
burns into every legislation to which it applies. The Constitution of India also does not fall
outside the scope of the rules laid down in this Act. Some key provisions of the Central law on
General Clauses are discussed here.
3.2 Section 5 Coming into force – when a Central Act is to ‘come into force’ from the date it
receives assent of the President of India, it shall come into force from ‘end of day preceding’
its commencement.
3.3 Section 6 Effect of repeal – when any Act is ‘repealed’, it shall not:
(a) Revive anything not in force;
(b) Affect anything already done;
(c) Affect any – right, privilege obligation or liability – arrived previously;
(d) Affect any – penalty, forfeiture, punishment – incurred previously;
(e) Affect any – investigation, legal proceeding or remedy – in respect of above.
3.4 Section 8 References to repealed enactments – when any law refers to provisions from
other laws which undergo amendment, then reference to those provisions will have to be
applied along with those amendments while enforcing the law.
3.5 Section 9 Commencement and termination of time – when referring to a series of days
with ‘from’ it excludes the first of those days and ‘to’ includes the last of those days.
3.6 Section 17 Functionaries – for indicating a person executing certain functions, it is
sufficient to mention the official title of the person and every successive incumbent in that
office will continue those functions.
3.7 Section 20 Construction of notification – words and expressions used in a notification
issued under an enactment must be interpreted according to the meaning available ofthose
words and expressions in the enactment itself.
3.8 Section 21 Scope of power – when power is given to issue notifications or orders, then
it includes the power to add, amend, vary or rescind those notifications or orders but the
procedure prescribed must be followed without any deviation.
3.9 Section 23 Laying down – when power is delegated with a condition that exercise of
such delegated power must be ‘laid’ before Parliament or ‘published’ in gazette or after any
other similar procedure of supervision (with or without affirmative action) then, unless the said
procedure is followed, the exercise of delegation is void.
3.10 Section 24 Continuation after repeal – when any notification or order is issued under a
law which is repealed and re-enacted, then those notifications or orders (unless inconsistent
with the re-enacted law) will continue to apply as if issued under the re-enacted law until
superseded.
3.11 Section 27 Meaning of service by post – when service is required in respect of any due
process, it is sufficient if the said process, properly addressed and stamped with all necessary
contents included, is put into dispatch which would reach the addressee in the normal course
of delivery by post.
4. Limitation
4.1 Assistance from the State is available to everyone whose rights are violated. If not,
those rights will be illusory. However, such assistance only avails to those who are vigilant
about enforcing their rights. Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt - the law
assists those that are vigilant with their rights, and not those that sleep thereupon.
4.2 Limitation is provided in every enactment and where it is missing, recourse may be had
to the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Certain matters, in the wisdom of law maker, do not have
any limitation or have a very large period of limitation.
4.3 Limitation is not that the underlying right abates but it merely states that the assistance
of the State is not available if the step to avail such assistance is not taken withinthe said
period of limitation. For example, section 25 of Indian Contract Act recognizes the payment of
a time barred debt
4.4 Prescription, on the other hand, is the state of affairs where after the expiration of the
period specified, the underlying right itself evaporates.
4.5 Identifying whether it is a case of limitation or prescription would greatly advance the
litigation strategy to be adopted. Reference may be had to illustration 61 above where it is
claimed by the revenue that the right to appeal abates after lapse of the time permitted for its
filing, whereas assessee holds that it is unjust and the time limit must not be treated as a
prescription but as a limitation which can be cured by intervention of higher judiciary.
4.6 Timelines of limitation can be interrupted by supervening events that can suspend the
clock. Such events could be way, lunacy, etc. Examination of expiration of limitation must also
take into account whether any supervening events may have occurred.
1. General Principles
1.1 Natural Justice
(a) Oryx Fisheries Private Limited v UOI 2011 (266) ELT 422 (SC)
Issue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court was whether the authority who issued show cause
notice proposing cancellation of the registration certificate of the appellant acted fairly and in
compliance with principles of natural justice and also whether such authority acted with an
open mind.
Quasi-judicial authority, while acting in exercise of its statutory power must act fairly and must
act with an open mind while initiating a show cause proceeding. A show cause proceeding is
meant to give the person proceeded against a reasonable opportunity of making his objection
against the proposed charges indicated in the notice.
(b) Kothari Filaments Vs. CC (Port), Kolkata, 2009 (233) E.L.T. 289 (S.C.)
The customs department, based on the enquires conducted and information collected, passed
the order of confiscation of goods and imposed penalties. The said information was not
supplied to the assessee.
Supreme Court held that when a document is relied upon by the department in passing an
order or coming to certain conclusions, the same cannot be done without supplying the relied
upon documents or information to the assessee
1.2 Contents of Notice
(a) CCE v Brindavan Beverages (P) Ltd. 2007 (213) ELT 487 (SC)
The allegations in the show cause notice was that the assessee wrongly availed the benefit of
SSI exemption.
Though the department’s case was that the assessee hadarranged their transactions to
erroneously avail the benefit of exemption, the allegations in show cause notice were not clear
and specific.
The Supreme Court observed that the show cause notice is the foundation on which the
department has to build up its case. If the allegations in the show cause notice are not specific
and are on the contrary vague, lack details and/or unintelligible that is sufficient to hold that
the noticee was not given proper opportunity to meet the allegations indicated in the show
cause notice.
112 Background Material on Litigation Management
(b) Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. v UOI 1978 (2) ELT J172 (SC)
The show cause notice alleged clandestine removal of dutiable goods based on sample
testing of raw materials and machinery usage.
The Supreme Court held that the show cause notice issued on the basis of assumption and
presumption and the findings based on such show cause notice are without any material
evidence and are based only on inferences involving unwarranted assumptions and are
vitiated by an error of law. In the absence of tangible evidence of clandestine activity the
notice was held as invalid.
1.3 Jurisdiction of the officer
(a) CC Vs Sayed Ali, 2011 (265) E.L.T. 17 (S.C.)
Whether Commissioner /Collector of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai has jurisdiction to issue
show cause notice when imports have taken place at Bombay Custom House
Supreme Court held that Customs officer assigned with specific functions of assessment and
re-assessment in jurisdictional area where goods imported, are competent to issue show
cause notice under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 as ‘proper officer’. such officer alone can
adjudicate the matters. Since Collector of Customs (Preventive) is not shown as officer
assigned with such functions under Section 28 as ‘proper officer’, such officer is not
competent to adjudicate the matters
1.4 Extended period of limitation
(a) Cosmic Dye Chemicals Vs. CCE, 1995 (75) E.L.T. 721 (S.C.)
The assessee did not include value of certain clearances, in the information supplied to the
department, on the basis of bona fide belief that these were exempted and need not include.
The issue before the Court was whether non-supply of information without intent to evade
would also be reasons to invoke extended period.
Each of the words (fraud, willful misstatement, collusion, Contravention of any provisions)
used in the statute allowing invocation of extended period of limitation, requires to prove
existence of intent to evade payment of duties. Without providing existence of intention to
evade, no extended period could be invoked.
(b) Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vs. CCE, Madras 1994 (74) E.L.T. 9 (SC)
Assessee, a statutory body engaged in manufacture of concrete and wood in two different
units, did not pay duty on wood on the basis of the belief that the wood products are not sold
but are used in construction activity.
When the law requires an intention to evade payment of duty then it is not mere failure to pay
duty. It must be something more. That is, the assessee must be aware that the duty was
leviable and it must deliberately avoid paying it. The word `evade’ in the context means
defeating the provision of law of paying duty. It is made more stringent by use of the word
`intent’. In other words, the assessee must deliberately avoid payment of duty which is
payable in accordance with law.
(c) Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Vs. CCEx., Delhi, 2009(240) ELT 641(S.C)
Issue relates to interpretation of the definition of phrase ‘inputs’ and eligibility to avail credit on
inputs used in power generation.
Huge litigation in the country stands generated on account of repeated amendments in Cenvat
Credit Rules hence penalty is not leviable, particularly on account of conflict of views
expressed by various Tribunals/High Courts, in large number of other cases where assessees
also succeeded.
1.5 Presence of counsel during deposition
(a) Poolpandi v Superintendent 1992 (60) ELT 24 (SC),
The Supreme Court held that a person being interrogated did not have the right to insist on the
presence of his lawyer.
The Court observed that there is no force in the arguments of appellant’s advocates that if a
person is called away from his own house and questioned in the atmosphere of the customs
office without the assistance of his lawyer or his friends, his constitutional right under Article
21 is violated
(b) Senior Intelligence Officer v Jugal Kishore Samra 2011 (270) ELT 147 (SC)
In this case, the applicability of above decision (Poolpandi case) to Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 was examined and it was held that the decision referred to
above would be applicable and the advocate could not be part of the investigation. However,
considering poor medicalconditions of the party, interrogation was allowed to be done in the
presence of a lawyer.
1.6 Act v. Rule
(a) Bimal Chandra Banerjee v. State of M.P. and Ors., (1971) 81 ITR 105,
No tax can be imposed by any bye-law or rule or regulation unless the statute under which the
subordinate legislation is made specially authorises the imposition even if it is assumed that
the power to tax can be delegated to the executive. The basis of the statutory power conferred
by the statute cannot be transgressed by the rule making authority. A rule making authority
has no plenary power. It has to act within the limits of the power granted to it.
(b) L. CHANDRA KUMAR Vs. UoI, 1997 (92) E.L.T. 318 (S.C)
Tribunal competent to test the vires of subordinate legislations and rules but not the vires of
their parent statutes because being a creature of an Act it cannot declare the very Act as
unconstitutional
2. Evidence
2.1 Burden of Proof
(a) State of Maharashtra v. Wasudeo Ram Chandra Kaidalwar AIR 1981 SC 1186
Burden of proof has two aspects (i) legal burden – to bring forth an assertion about something
and (ii) evidential burden – to lead evidence to establish that assertion. The former is burden
and later is onus. Burden does not shift but onus shifts. An issue poorly defended does not
prove the allegation unless the allegation itself is proved satisfactorily. No benefit of an
assertion accrues unless burden of proof is discharged. Burden to prove lies on the person
who asserts (onus probandi).
A substantive point not contested during adjudication but contested only in appeal causes
misleading of adjudication process. Party entitled to contest estopped from questioning
admitted or uncontested assertion.
Onus permits adducing counter-evidence to displace the proof adduced to establish the
assertion. Once proof of assertion is displaced, the assertion, while still true, is rendered
without force during remainder of proceedings.
Burden of proof and onus of proof are not synonymous. Refer res ipsa loquitur.
2.2 Degree of proof
(a) Mah. State Board of Secondary & Higher Education v. KS Gandhi (1991) 2 SCC 716
Strict rules of Evidence Act do not apply to domestic Tribunals. It is open to receive all
necessary, relevant, cogent and acceptable material facts though not strictly proved. Inference
from evidence and circumstances must be carefully distinguished from conjectures or
speculation. The mind is prone to take pleasure to adapt circumstances to one another and
even in straining them a little to force them to form parts of one connected whole. The
standard of proof is not proof beyond reasonable doubt but the preponderance of probabilities
tending to draw an inference that the facts must be probable. Probative value of evidence
must be gauged from facts and circumstances of the case. Incriminating facts incompatible
with innocence – is the degree to which an assertion is to reach to be disproved.
Seriousness of offence and evidence in support must be proportionate. As a matter of ordinary
human experience, a person is less easily satisfied that a serious allegation is made out than
that a trivial one is made out.
Severity of consequences inherently discourages deviation. Fraud is less likely than
negligence. Courts are to try the case, not the moral rectitude of assessee. Doubt about
innocence not adequate to establish guilt.
2.3 Presumption
(a) Sodhi Transport Co. v. UO AIR 1985 SC 1099
A presumption is not in itself evidence but only makes a prima facie case for party in whose
favour it exists. It indicates the person on whom the burden of proof lies. When presumption is
conclusive it obviates the production of any other evidence. But when it is rebuttable it only
points out the party on whom lies the duty of going forward with evidence on the fact
presumed, and when that party has provided evidence fairly and reasonably tending to show
that the real fact is not as presumed, the purpose of presumption is over.
Proved means the evidence adduced establishes the assertion. Disproved means that based
on evidence.
3. Interpretation
3.1 Per incuriam
(a) Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community Vs State of Maharashtra, 2010 (254) ELT
196 (SC)
Review of earlier judgment. Doctrine of precedents.
“Per incuriam” means a decision rendered in ignorance of a previous binding decision such as
decision of its own or of a Court of coordinate or higher jurisdiction. It may also mean decision
rendered in ignorance of terms of a statute or of a rule having force of law.
(b) State of UP Vs Synthetics and Chemicals Limited, 1991 (4) SCC 139
‘Incuria’ literally means ‘carelessness’. In practice per incuriam appears to mean per
ignoratium. The ‘quotable in law’ is avoided and ignored if it is rendered, ‘in ignoratium of a
state, or other binding authority’.
3.2 Sub Silentio
(a) Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur [(1989) 1 SCC 101],
Under Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, there was a bar on Illegal encroachment on
public land. A question arose whether the Commissioner can exercise authority to remove
encroachment.
A decision is sub silentio when the particular point of law involved in the decision is not
perceived by the court or present to its mind. The court may consciously decide in favour of
one party because of point A, which it considers and pronounces upon. It may be shown,
however, that logically the court should not have decided in favour of the particular party
unless it also decided point B in his favour; but point B was not argued or considered by the
court. In such circumstances, although point B was logically involved in the facts and although
the case had a specific outcome, the decision is not an authority on point B. Point B is said to
pass sub silentio.
(b) Security Printing & Minting Corpn of India Ltd Vs Gandhi Industrial Corporation, 2007
(217) ELT 489 (SC)
Job work was done for gumming and super-calendering of stamp paper for appellant-security
press. Impugned papers brought by appellant after paying excise duty and gate passes issued
evidencing thereof. Issue was whether Appellant was entitled to Modvat benefit.
Principle of sub silentio not applicable when terms and conditions well known and clearly
understood between parties.
3.3 Res Judicata
(a) M.J. Exporters P. Limited Vs UOI, 2015 (325) ELT 216 (SC)
The appellant had challenged the demand of interest claimed by the Department on the
amount of duty paid belatedly. The High Court rejected the prayer of the appellant and gave
partial relief for recalculating interest.
Settled law that principles of constructive res judicata are applicable in writ proceedings
also.Accordingly, while undoubtedly question of law can be raised at any time of lis, appellant
not permitted to raise fresh argument on law point on a foreclosed issue.
(b) CC Vs Texcomash Export, 2015 (322) ELT 601 (SC)
The respondent had exported children’s garments to Russia under the claim of drawback.
Value for drawback purpose was fixed by the ACC, which was challenged in earlier
proceedings and concluded by higher authority. Fresh show cause notice was issued by
alleging fraud against the respondent and on that basis, the entire issue was sought to be
reopened.
Show cause notice for drawback recovery was not issuable by Commissioner, when issue had
already been settled by higher authority viz., Joint Secretary (Review). Even if certain
additional material had cometo notice, proper course was to challenge order of Joint Secretary
(Review) at appropriate forum. No infirmity in Tribunal’s order setting aside demand arising out
of impugned show cause notice.
3.4 Promissory Estoppel
(a) Shrijee Sales Corpn Vs UOI, 1997 (89) ELT 452 (SC)
Appellant had imported PVC Resin, which was sought to be taxed. Whether time bound
customs exemption can be removed prior to its expiry.
The principle of promissory Estoppel is applicable against the Government but in case there is
a supervening public equity, the Government would be allowed to change its stand. It would
then be able to withdraw from representation made by it which induced persons to take certain
steps which may have gone adverse to the interest of such persons on account of such
withdrawal. However, the Court must satisfy itself that such a public interest exists.
(b) Kasinka Trading Vs UOI, 1994 (74) ELT 782 (SC)
Courts would not interfere with fiscal policy unless there is fraud or lack of bona fides on the
part of Government.
(c) UOI Vs Dharampal Satyapal Ltd, 2015 (319) ELT 6 (SC)
Industries set up in North-Eastern Region were exempted from Excise Duty. The exemption on
tobacco product was sought to be withdrawn. Whether it was hit by promissory estoppel.
Withdrawal of exemption did not violate the principle of promissory estoppel.
3.5 Lex Non CogitImpossiblia
(a) Indian Seamless Steel & Alloys Ltd Vs UOI, 2003 (156) ELT 945 (Bom.)
Prescribed period for making payment of tax expired on a holiday. Whether there was a
default in tax payment.
Law cannot compel a person to do the impossible. Unforeseen circumstance beyond control of
assessee resulting in non-payment of duty would not mean that there was failure to pay the
duty by due date.
(b) Hico Enterprises Vs CC, 2005 (189) ELT 135 (T-LB). Affirmed by SC in 2008 (228) ELT
161 (SC)
Export obligation under Notification No. 203/92-Cus. was fulfilled by original licence holder.
Department alleged that endorsement of transferability made on licence obtained by fraud or
misrepresentation. Satisfaction arrived at by DGFT that exporter had discharged export
obligation without availing input credit is binding on the Customs Department at all times.
Maxim Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossiblia to be read from the point of view of performance of an
act by transferee of licence to fulfil condition, which is allegedly not discharged by transferor
but not from the point of view of applicability of Notification No. 203/92-Cus.
(b) ACCE Vs Dunlop India Ltd &Ors, 1985 (19) ELT 22 (SC)
Impact of ex parte interim orders
It is inevitable in a Hierarchical system of courts that there are decisions of the Supreme Court
which do not attract the unanimous approval of all members of the judiciary, but the judicial
system only works if someone is allowed to have the last word and that last word once spoken
is loyally accepted. The better wisdom of the Courts below must yield to the Higher wisdom of
the Court above that is the strength of the hierarchical judicial system. In India, needless to
say, under Article 141 of the Constitution, the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be
binding on all courts within the territory of India, and under Article 144 all authorities civil and
judicial in the territory of India shall act in aid of the Supreme Court.
3.9 Judicial discipline
(a) Pradip Chandra Parija Vs Pramod Chandra Patnaik, 2002 (144) ELT 7 (SC)
Judicial discipline to be followed by Judges as regards Court decisions.
Judicial discipline requires that two Judge Bench should follow the decision of a Bench of
three learned Judges. If the two Judge Bench concludes that the earlier judgment of three
learned Judges is very incorrect and under no circumstances to be followed, proper course is
to set out the reasons why it could not agree with the earlier judgment and refer the matter to
a Bench of three Judges and if then the Bench of three Judges also comes to the conclusion
that the earlier judgment of a Bench of three learned Judges is incorrect, it should refer the
matter to a Bench of five learned Judges.
(b) UOI Vs Kamalakshi Finance Corpn. Ltd, 1991 (55) ELT 433 (SC)
It cannot be too vehemently emphasised that it is of utmost importance that, in disposing of
the quasi-judicial issues before them, revenue officers are bound by the decisions of the
appellate authorities. The order of the Appellate Collector is binding on the Assistant
Collectors working within his jurisdiction and the order of the Tribunal is binding upon the
Assistant Collectors and the Appellate Collectors who function under the jurisdiction of the
Tribunal. The principles of judicial discipline require that the orders of the higher appellate
authorities should be followed unreservedly by the subordinate authorities. The mere fact that
the order of the appellate authority is not “acceptable” to the department, in itself an
objectionable phrase and the subject-matter of an appeal, can furnish no ground for not
following it unless its operation has been suspended by a competent Court. If this healthy rule
is not followed, the result will only be undue harassment to assessees and chaos in
administration of tax laws.
3.10 Doctrine of merger
(a) Kunhyammed Vs State of Kerala, 2001 (129) ELT 11 (SC)
Doctrine of merger is neither a doctrine of constitutional law nor one statutorily recognized. It
is a common law doctrine founded on principles of propriety in the hierarchy of justice delivery
system. Its underlying logic is that there cannot be more than one operative order governing
the same subject matter at a given point of time. The doctrine is not of universal or unlimited
application. To attract it, the superior jurisdiction should be capable of reversing, modifying or
affirming the order put in issue before it and it should do so by passing a speaking and
reasoned order.
(b) Fuljit Kaur vs. State of Punjab, 2010 (262) ELT 40 (SC)
Unique case of an influential person having allotment of residential plot in discretionary quota
within 48 hours of submission of application and to assert right to have land at throwaway
price and not deposit sale price for quarter of a century.
Dismissal of Special Leave Petition in limine does not mean reasoning of judgment of High
Court stood affirmed or such judgment merges with Supreme Court order. Such dismissal of
SLP means case not considered as worthy of examination. Such order does not operate as
res judicata and is not a binding precedent.