ANOVA 2 (2) NNNKN
ANOVA 2 (2) NNNKN
Example 2.1 In a study on automobile traffic and air pollution reported in the International
Journal of Environmental Studies, air samples taken at four different times and at
five different locations were analyzed to obtain the amount of particulate matter
present in the air (mg/rn3).
Let;
The Model
Figure 1. Mean responses for (a) an additive, and (b) a nonadditive model
For the
The interpretation of the parameters of (3) is straightforward: μ is the true grand mean),
αi is the effect of factor A at level i (measured as a deviation from μ ), and βj is the effect
of factor B at level j. Unbiased (and maximum likelihood) estimators for these
parameters are;
Example 3
called a randomized block experiment. An extraneous factor, “blocks,” is constructed by dividing the
IJ units into J groups with I units in each group. This grouping or blocking is done in such a way
that within each block, the I units are homogeneous with respect to other factors thought to affect
the responses. Then within each homogeneous block, the I treatments are randomly assigned to the
I units or subjects in the block.
Example 5
A consumer product-testing organization wished to compare the annual power consumption
for five different brands of dehumidifier. Because power consumption depends on the prevailing
humidity level, it was decided to monitor each brand at four different levels ranging from moderate
to heavy humidity (thus blocking on humidity level). Within each level, brands were randomly
assigned to the five selected locations. The resulting amount of power consumption (annual kwh)
appears in Table 2.
Table 2 Power consumption data for Example 5
Exercises
Continuation
of question 4
Continuation
of question 2
2.2
To obtain valid test procedures, the μij’s were assumed to have an additive structure with
(2.7)
(2.8)
(2.9)
(2.10)
Example 2.6
Three different varieties of tomato (Harvester, Pusa Early Dwarf, and Ife No. 1) and four different
plant densities (10, 20, 30, and 40 thousand plants per hectare) are being considered for planting in
a particular region. To see whether either variety or plant density affects yield, each combination of
variety and plant density is used in three different plots, resulting in the data on yields in Table 2.6.
To test the hypotheses of interest, we again define sums of squares and present computing formulas:
Total variation is thus partitioned into four pieces: unexplained (SSE) and three pieces that may be
explained by the truth or falsity of the three H0’s. Each of four mean squares is defined by MS = SS/df.
The expected mean squares suggest that each set of hypotheses should be tested using the appropriate
ratio of mean squares with MSE in the denominator:
Each of the three mean square ratios can be shown to have an F distribution when the associated H0 is
true, which yields the following level α test procedures:
Example 2.9
A study was carried out to compare the writing lifetimes of four premium brands of
pens. It was thought that the writing surface might affect lifetime, so three different surfaces were
randomly selected. A writing machine was used to ensure that conditions were otherwise
homogeneous (e.g., constant pressure and a fixed angle). Table 2.8 shows the two lifetimes (mm)
obtained for each brand—surface combination.
Table 2.8 Lifetime data for Example 2.9
Exercises
e)-
2.3
Three-Factor ANOVA
If we use dot subscripts on the μij’s to denote averaging (rather than summation), then
(2.11)
(2.12)
(2 11)
(2.13)
(2 11)
(2.13)
(2.11)
Advanced Engineering Statistics
The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 27 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.
Even the computational formulas for these SSs are quite tedious to use, so we eschew them in favour
of output from a statistical computer package. The current version of MINITAB, for example, will fit a
three-factor model with fixed, mixed, or random effects. Each sum of squares (excepting SST) when
divided by its df gives a mean square, with
Advanced Engineering Statistics
The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 28 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.
Main effect and interaction hypotheses are tested by forming F ratios with MSE in each denominator:
Example 2.10
The following observations (body temperature — 100°F) were reported in an
experiment to study heat tolerance of cattle. Measurements were made at four
different periods (factor A, with I = 4) on two different strains of cattle (factor B,
with J = 2) having four different types of coat (factor C, with K = 4); L = 3
observations were made for each of the 4 x 2 x 4 = 32 combinations of levels of
the three factors.
Figure 2.4
Example 2.11
Exercises
Solution of question 27
Solution of question 28