0% found this document useful (0 votes)
90 views36 pages

ANOVA 2 (2) NNNKN

The document discusses multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) techniques. It introduces ANOVA models for two or more factors and provides examples analyzing data with two factors. These include additive models and randomized block designs. It also discusses random effects models and mixed effects models. Test procedures are described to evaluate hypotheses about factor effects and interactions based on F-ratio tests of mean squares from the ANOVA table.

Uploaded by

eyassadaileh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
90 views36 pages

ANOVA 2 (2) NNNKN

The document discusses multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) techniques. It introduces ANOVA models for two or more factors and provides examples analyzing data with two factors. These include additive models and randomized block designs. It also discusses random effects models and mixed effects models. Test procedures are described to evaluate hypotheses about factor effects and interactions based on F-ratio tests of mean squares from the ANOVA table.

Uploaded by

eyassadaileh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 36

Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 1 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Multifactor Analysis of Variance


In many experimental situations, there are two or more factors that are of simultaneous interest.
ANOVA 2 extends the methods of ANOVA 1 to investigate such multifactor situations.

Example 2.1 In a study on automobile traffic and air pollution reported in the International
Journal of Environmental Studies, air samples taken at four different times and at
five different locations were analyzed to obtain the amount of particulate matter
present in the air (mg/rn3).

Let;

Example 1, the number of levels of factor A is I = 4, the number of levels of factor

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 2 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

The Model

Includingσ², there are now I + J + 1 model parameters, so if I ≥ 3 and J ≥ 3, then there


will be fewer parameters than observations. The model specified above is called an
additive model because

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 3 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Figure 1. Mean responses for (a) an additive, and (b) a nonadditive model

Example 2(Example 1 continued)


If we plot the observed xij’s in a manner analogous to that of Figure 1, the result is shown in Figure
2. While there is some “crossing over” in the observed xij’s, the configuration is reasonably
representative of what would be expected under additivity with just one observation per treatment.

Figure 2 Plot of data from Example 2

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 4 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

For the

The interpretation of the parameters of (3) is straightforward: μ is the true grand mean),
αi is the effect of factor A at level i (measured as a deviation from μ ), and βj is the effect
of factor B at level j. Unbiased (and maximum likelihood) estimators for these
parameters are;

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 5 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Example 3

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 6 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

ANOVA table (Table 2.1) summarizes further calculations.

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 7 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Example 4 (Example 3 continued)

Randomized Block Experiments


It frequently happens, though, that subjects or experimental units exhibit heterogeneity with
respect to other variables that may affect the observed responses. This was the reason for
introducing a paired experiment in C.I section. The analogy to a paired experiment when I > 2 is
Advanced Engineering Statistics
The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 8 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

called a randomized block experiment. An extraneous factor, “blocks,” is constructed by dividing the
IJ units into J groups with I units in each group. This grouping or blocking is done in such a way
that within each block, the I units are homogeneous with respect to other factors thought to affect
the responses. Then within each homogeneous block, the I treatments are randomly assigned to the
I units or subjects in the block.

Example 5
A consumer product-testing organization wished to compare the annual power consumption
for five different brands of dehumidifier. Because power consumption depends on the prevailing
humidity level, it was decided to monitor each brand at four different levels ranging from moderate
to heavy humidity (thus blocking on humidity level). Within each level, brands were randomly
assigned to the five selected locations. The resulting amount of power consumption (annual kwh)
appears in Table 2.
Table 2 Power consumption data for Example 5

Table .3 ANOVA table for Example .5

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 9 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Figure 3 SAS output for power consumption data

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 10 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Models for Random Effects


In a two-factor situation, a random effects model is appropriate. The case in which the levels of one
factor are the only ones of interest and the levels of the other factor are selected from a population
of levels leads to a mixed effects model. The two-factor random effects model when Kij = 1 is

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 11 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Exercises

Continuation
of question 4

Continuation
of question 2

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 12 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Solution for question 2

Solution for question 3

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 13 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Solution for question 4

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 14 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

2.2

To obtain valid test procedures, the μij’s were assumed to have an additive structure with

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 15 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Parameters for the Fixed Effects Model with Interaction


Let

(2.7)

(2.8)

(2.9)

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 16 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

(2.10)

Example 2.6

Three different varieties of tomato (Harvester, Pusa Early Dwarf, and Ife No. 1) and four different
plant densities (10, 20, 30, and 40 thousand plants per hectare) are being considered for planting in
a particular region. To see whether either variety or plant density affects yield, each combination of
variety and plant density is used in three different plots, resulting in the data on yields in Table 2.6.

Table 2.6 Yield data for Example 2.6

To test the hypotheses of interest, we again define sums of squares and present computing formulas:

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 17 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Total variation is thus partitioned into four pieces: unexplained (SSE) and three pieces that may be
explained by the truth or falsity of the three H0’s. Each of four mean squares is defined by MS = SS/df.
The expected mean squares suggest that each set of hypotheses should be tested using the appropriate
ratio of mean squares with MSE in the denominator:

Each of the three mean square ratios can be shown to have an F distribution when the associated H0 is
true, which yields the following level α test procedures:

As before, the results of the analysis are summarized in an ANOVA table.

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 18 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Example 2.7 (continuation of example 2.6)

Table 2.7 ANOVA table for Example 2.7

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 19 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Example 2.8 (continuation of example 2.7)

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 20 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Models with Mixed and Random Effects


In some problems, the levels of either factor may have been chosen from a large population of
possible levels, so that the effects contributed by the factor are random rather than fixed. If both
factors contribute random effects, the model is referred to as a random effects model, while if one
factor is fixed and the other is random, a mixed effects model results. We will consider here the
analysis for a mixed effects model in which factor A (rows) is the fixed factor and factor B
(columns) is the random factor. The mixed effects model in this situation is

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 21 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Example 2.9
A study was carried out to compare the writing lifetimes of four premium brands of
pens. It was thought that the writing surface might affect lifetime, so three different surfaces were
randomly selected. A writing machine was used to ensure that conditions were otherwise
homogeneous (e.g., constant pressure and a fixed angle). Table 2.8 shows the two lifetimes (mm)
obtained for each brand—surface combination.
Table 2.8 Lifetime data for Example 2.9

Table 2.9 ANOVA table for Example 2.9

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 22 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Exercises

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 23 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Solution for question 15

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 24 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Solution for question 16

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 25 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

e)-

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 26 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

2.3
Three-Factor ANOVA

If we use dot subscripts on the μij’s to denote averaging (rather than summation), then

(2.11)

(2.12)
(2 11)

(2.13)
(2 11)

(2.13)

(2.11)
Advanced Engineering Statistics
The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 27 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

factors, there would be corresponding higher-order interaction terms with analogous


interpretations.

The Analysis of a Three-Factor Experiment


When L > 1, there is a sum of squares for each main effect, note that any of the model parameters
in (2.13) can be estimated unbiasedly by averaging Xijkl over appropriate subscripts and taking
differences. Thus,

Even the computational formulas for these SSs are quite tedious to use, so we eschew them in favour
of output from a statistical computer package. The current version of MINITAB, for example, will fit a
three-factor model with fixed, mixed, or random effects. Each sum of squares (excepting SST) when
divided by its df gives a mean square, with
Advanced Engineering Statistics
The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 28 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Main effect and interaction hypotheses are tested by forming F ratios with MSE in each denominator:

Example 2.10
The following observations (body temperature — 100°F) were reported in an
experiment to study heat tolerance of cattle. Measurements were made at four
different periods (factor A, with I = 4) on two different strains of cattle (factor B,
with J = 2) having four different types of coat (factor C, with K = 4); L = 3
observations were made for each of the 4 x 2 x 4 = 32 combinations of levels of
the three factors.

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 29 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Figure 2.4

Figure 2.4 Plots of Xijk. for Example 2.10

Table 2.10 ANOVA table for Example 2.10

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 30 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Latin Square Designs


When several factors are to be studied simultaneously, an experiment in which
there is at least one observation for every possible combination of levels is referred
to as a complete layout. If the factors are A, B, and C with I, J, and K levels,
respectively, a complete layout requires at least IJK observations.
A three-factor experiment in which fewer than JfK observations are made is
called an incomplete layout. There are some incomplete layouts in which the
pattern of combinations of factors is such that the analysis is straightforward. One
such three-factor design is called a Latin square. It is appropriate when I = J = K
(e.g., four display configurations, four stores, and four time periods) and all two- and
three-factor interaction effects are assumed absent. If the levels of factor A are
identified with the rows of a two-way table and the levels of B with the columns of
the table, then the defining characteristic of a Latin square design is that every
level of factor C appears exactly once in each row and exactly once in each column.
Pictured in Figure 2.5 are examples of 3 x 3, 4 x 4, and 5 x 5 Latin squares. There
are 12 different 3 x 3 Latin squares, and the number of different N x N Latin squares
increases rapidly with N (e.g., every permutation of rows of a given Latin square
yields a Latin square, and similarly for column permutations).

Figure 2.5 Examples of Latin squares

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 31 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

The Model and Analysis for Latin Squares

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 32 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Example 2.11

In an experiment to investigate the effect of relative humidity on abrasion


resistance of leather cut from a rectangular pattern, a 6 x 6 Latin square was
used to control for possible variability due to row and column position in the
pattern. The six levels of relative humidity studied were 1 = 25%, 2 = 37%, 3
= 50%, 4 = 62%, 5 = 75%, and 6 = 87%, with the following results:

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 33 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Table 2.10 ANOVA table for Example 2.11

Exercises

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 34 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Solution of question 27

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 35 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Solution of question 28

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2
Dr.Ramadan. Jabr Page 36 Mutah University/Mech. Eng. Dept.

Advanced Engineering Statistics


The Analysis of Variance 2

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy