Gender Based Violence Proposal New
Gender Based Violence Proposal New
BY
KYOMUGISHA SHEILA KETRAH
1173 – 06404 - 10804
1
CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0 Introduction
This chapter presents the introduction to the study which covers: the background of the study,
statement of the problem, objectives of the study, research questions, significance of the study,
scope of the study, limitations of the study, conceptual framework and assumptions of the study.
The EFA, and part of SDGs key objectives is to strongly advocate for international education
agenda and enhance gender equality in education. These objectives have been key in attracting
international attention and guiding the educational operations over time. Through these
2
initiatives, considerable gains have been made in access to education in both developed and
developing Nations (Concern Worldwide, 2013). Amidst these initiatives, SRGBV continues to
be one of the most pervasive yet least recognized human rights violations in the world and a
major challenge to the achievement of EFA across the globe. Plan and Child Helpline
International (2011) has established that globally, between 500 million and 1.5 billion children
experience violence every year, mainly within schools. Furthermore, an estimated 150 million
girls and 73 million boys experienced sexual violence. In the United Kingdom, it has been
established that SRGBV in and around schools is a major barrier to the realization of all
children’s rights to education, and protection from all forms of violence and abuse (Pinheiro,
2006).
In Bangladesh a survey by Plan programme (2007) established that 91% of school children
reported having been physically punished and in India study carried out across 13 states found
out that more than half of children reported having been involved in different forms of sexual
abuse. Surprisingly in Swaziland, one-third of girls between ages13 and 17 revealed that their
first sexual experience was forced and that it took place in their own homes (Fraser, 2012).
A study by Save the Children in Yemen revealed that 31 per cent of school children were
exposed to sexual abuse (Leach et al., 2013). A similar 2008 study in Lebanon showed that 16
per cent of school children reported sexual abuse, majority being girls. In a similar study in Peru,
169 teachers were prosecuted because of rape and other inappropriate behavior in 2007 alone
(Ibid). Gender based violence has no boundaries and the cases are wide spread across the world.
The trend has however been that, girls are most at risk of Gender Based Violence within and
even outside school environment, but boys are also vulnerable (United Nations Girls' Education
Initiative (UNGEI, 2013).
Majority of the gender based violence cases occur at home or in school, committed by persons
known to the victims (Wanjiru, 2011). Cases of peer-to-peer sexual harassment have been
experienced frequently in both primary and secondary schools. Wubs, Lief, Alan, Sheri, Hans,
Sylvia and Catherine (2009) in a survey on dating violence among school students in Cape Town
South Africa and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania found out that, 10.2% - 37.8% of the students had
3
been victims of sexual violence, 3.1% - 21.8% had been perpetrators, while 8.6% - 42.8% had
been both. This compares with the global survey by World Health Organization (2002) which
established that 150 million girls under the age of 18 had experienced sexual violence, while
36% –62% of reported sexual assaults were committed against girls who were 15 years or
younger.
Global data on SRGBV are fragmented. While there is some evidence on the harmful effects of
SRGBV, its impact on academic achievement in particular has not been studied extensively. In
Botswana, a study by Kibriya, et al., (2016) in depicts the negative effect of being bullied weekly
on student performance in reading, science, and math. Students who experience bullying score
lower than those who are not bullied. Similarly in Ghana, students who experience bullying
perform worse academically than non-bullied students. In South Africa, students who are bullied
score between 13 and 25 points less than those who are not bullied, corresponding to a 3% to 6%
decrease. Overall the study demonstrated bullying as a key factor that drives a decrease in
academic performance in Ghana, Botswana and South Africa. Bullying statistically overpowers
other influences on student performance, particularly in Botswana and South Africa. Other
factors that emerged through this study that influence students’ academic performance include
students’ sex and age, teachers’ sex and experience, parents’ education, and geographical
location. However, in all countries the effect of bullying was more influential than the individual
effect of these other variables. This shows the enormity of gender violence in students’ academic
performance although this did not take into account the other SRGBV forms.
In Uganda it is not clear on the origin of gender based violence in school however, the first case
to be publicly highlighted can be traced back to 1991 where high school male students invaded a
girls' dormitory and raped more than 70 girls, another 19 female students died while escaping
from the attack at a tender age of 15 and below (Sang, 2008). In July 1996, several girls were
attacked and raped within the school compound in Kawempe division. In 2006 there was yet
another case of mass rape against schoolgirls in which approximately 15 girls were victims as
fellow students staged a protest within the school in the middle of the night (Mathiu, 2008). In
2007, a group of boys in who were demonstrating against their internal school administration and
conditions raided a neighboring girls school and sexually assaulted the girls (Ruto & Chege,
4
2006). In all these incidents there is an orgy of gender based violence and sexual assaults
targeting the girls and suggests an emerging culture of mass sexual violence against girls in
schools in Uganda.
Outside the school environment, increase in gender based violence against school going children
still remains to be a challenge. According to Munyui (2004) the Uganda police recorded 1,987
cases of rape in 2001 compared with 2,908 reported cases in 2004 which accounts for 46.4%
increase between the duration under study. These are the cases that were reported others
occurred but remained unaccounted for. The actual figure is thought to be higher considering that
not all violations are reported. In Kawempe division the prevalence level of gender based
violence against school going children stands at 47% (Githinji, 2011).
Statistics indicate that although boys have been victims of gender based violence and sexual
assault girls are more vulnerable (Githinji, 2011). The World Health Organization (WHO)
estimates are that between 36 and 62 percent of all sexual assault victims are aged below 15
years. Further statistics from Nairobi Women’s hospital in Nairobi indicate that 55% of those
who are sexually violated are girls aged 0-15 years (Munyui 2004). Gender based violence
against girls includes group rape attacks of girls that occur periodically.
GBV has various effects on the psychological, social and economic life of the victims. It has
been identified as a profound health problem, compromising victim’s physical health, and
eroding their self-esteem. In addition to injury, violence exposes women to other health risks.
Sexual abuse enhances risk of unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and adverse
pregnancy problems among women. The costs of handling sexual violence remains high but in
almost every society in the world there are social institutions established to address gender based
violence which adds to the cost of GBV (Heise, 2002).
Generally, the performance in secondary schools in Uganda has been dismal. For instance, in the
year 2019, the percentage of candidates who obtained grade C+ and above was 28.36% which
was lower when compared to 29.12% in 2018. Students who scored D+ and above which was
5
considered as the pass level in 2019 were 68.46% compared to 71.16% in 2018. The pass rate
was again slightly lower in 2019 when compared to 2018 (Kilonzo, 2013).
In Uganda, Gender based violence in schools manifests itself in a number of ways which include
rioting, sexual harassment, fighting and bullying. These activities have a significant negative
effect on the smooth running of school activities besides affecting the students’ personal security
and their emotional stability. For instance, violence may contribute to lifelong physical
deformities, humiliation, disinterest, withdrawal, poor academic performance, high dropout rates
and even death of affected students (Ruto, 2009). The implications of violence are far-fetched
and have both direct and indirect impacts on the life of the child in general and participation in
school activities. Sexual, physical and psychological abuse frequently occurs together. There is
also emotional distress leading to depression, anxiety and anger. All these impacts negatively on
the social life of students and is likely to result in poor academic performance.
In Kawempe Division Statistics from the Kawempe Sub County Hospital (2018) indicate that at
least 3 to 4 cases of GBV are reported monthly. Further, statistics from the Kawempe Division
Education office in (2018) revealed that UCE and UACE performance had declined from a mean
score of 5.08 in 2019 to 4.98 in 2018. In 2018 there was a slight improvement to a mean score of
5.00 which was still below the 2019 performance.
6
Kawempe Division Education office in (2018) revealed that UCE and UACE performance has
been declining from a mean score of 5.08 in 2018 to 4.98 in 2019.
Global data on SRGBV are fragmented. While there is some evidence on the harmful effects of
SRGBV, its impact on academic achievement in particular has not been studied extensively.
Studies in Uganda on gender based violence on school going children has focused on the number
of cases rather than the effects and impacts. Kibriya, et al., (2016) depicts a number of factors
that influence students academic performance such as students’ sex and age, teachers’ sex and
experience, parents’ education, and geographical location. However, violent acts such as
bullying were more influential than the individual effect of these other variables. In Kawempe
Division, data on the effects of SRGBV on academic performance remains scanty. This study
specifically seeks to identify the common types of school related gender based violence cases
that take place in secondary schools, including the current trend of SRGBV and its effects on the
performance. The study will also seek to identify the measures that have been put in place to
mitigate against the effects. It is with this in mind that the current study will broadly seek to
determine the relationship between school related gender based violence and students academic
performance in secondary schools in Kawempe Division.
7
iv. Identify the measures that have been put in place to mitigate against the effects of gender
based violence in secondary schools in Kawempe Division.
8
In this study, the research considered a period of six years that is from 2013-2018. This is
because the area under investigation faced a huge decline in performance of students due to
school related Gender based violence (Kawempe division Annual Report, 2019).
It is also hoped that the study may assist the ministry of education in developing policy measures
to tackle GBV in schools and develop strategies for improving the much sought performance in
schools. Further parents and the community at large may also benefit by being able to identify
the forms and effects of GBV which will assist in addressing the problem of gender based
violence in and out of schools, this is hoped to have a trickle-down effect to the community as a
whole.
Gender: Refers to the socially/ culturally determined power relations, roles, responsibilities and
entitlements for men and women. The social constructs vary between cultures as well as over
time. In this study gender will be categorized as either male or female.
Gender based violence: This refers to any form of act of violence that may result in or is likely
to result in physical sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women and men on the basis of
gender.
9
UCE and UACE: These are abbreviations for the Uganda Certificate of Education or Uganda
advanced Certificate of Education, which is an examination administered to students at the end
of the four year and six years secondary education level.
Non-Consensual Touching: In this study is used to refer to the act of touching by a member of
the opposite sex without consenting.
Performance: This is a broad term which incorporates the performance of students in class and
out of class. It also captures UCE and UACE performance at the end of secondary education
curriculum. This study will focus on academic performance on the academic grades.
School Related Gender Based Violence: In this study it refers to gender based violence that
occurs in and around schools. These include and not limited to sexual harassment, fighting,
seduction, non-consensual touching, bullying, hitting, punching, kicking or threats.
10
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATUREREVIEW
2.0 Introduction
This chapter presents a review of literature on studies that have been done on gender based
violence in schools focusing on the global perspective, regional perspective, local perspective
and their effects on students’ performance in school. The section will be guided by the study
objectives in discussing the studies then highlight the gaps in literature that need to be filled.
The feminist theory perceives rape as a function of mechanism of social control in patriarchal
dominated societies (Riger and Gordon, 1981). Feminist theorists argue that men assert their
power using rape and the fear of rape to maintain the existing system of gender stratification
(Adamec and Adamec, 1981). Furthermore, Clark and Lewis (1977) predict cases of rape are
more likely to occur in societies where women are perceived as merely sexual and reproductive
possessions of their men. In such environments, men tend to sustain their power and privilege
and enforce what they call their sexual rights using threats and force against women.
The feminism theory further attributes rape to traditionally perceived gender-role attitudes
(Curtis, 1975; Russell, 1975; Weis and Borges, 1977).Consequently, norms which are attributed
to masculinity, such as dominance and aggression, encourage men to sexually exploit women.
11
Considering that the acquisition of sexual scripts is closely allied to the development of gender-
role identities, it is imperative to state that male sexual behaviour is deeply engraved in the
traditional masculine traits of dominance and aggression (Gagnon and Simon,
1973).Brownmiller (1975) perceives rape as an act of power that provides a basis for male
bonding and enforcing masculinity by undermining and dehumanizing the female victims. This
type of gender violence against women is perpetuated in part by the belief in rape myths. Rape
myths prejudicial and untrue beliefs about rape that serve to justify why violence against women
is perpetuated by shifting the blame on the women that they are themselves responsible for
becoming victims of rape (Burt, 1980).
Feminist theory was used in the current study to define gender based violence and in identifying
its different forms and manifestations in schools. The theory defines sexual violence in terms of
offensive activities that one gender engages in to exercise dominance over the other gender. In
the current study, gender based violence is defined as the exercise of dominance of one gender
over another. For instance in sexual harassment, fighting, bullying, seduction and non-
consensual touching of students from one gender by others from the opposite gender can be
viewed as exercise of power of one gender over another when it is performed forcefully without
the consent of the other party. This could happen for both girls and boys perpetuated by teachers,
fellow students or members of support staff within the school. The power driving this dominance
could either be physiological, economic, social and psychological.
12
Independent variables
School Related Gender Based Dependent variables
Academic Performance
Violence
Grades obtained in
Types of Violence UCE and UACE
Sexual harassment Interest with
Fighting schooling
Bullying
Students motivation
Seduction
Non-consensual
touching
Intervening variables
School environment
Home environment
Peer Influence
Management of
SRGBV
Figure 2.1: Conceptual Framework on School Related Gender Based Violence and Academic
Performance
The main independent variable of the study is the school related gander based violence which
was operationalized using the different forms of gender based violence eminent in schools which
include: sexual harassment, fighting, bullying, seduction and non-consensual touching. The study
was of the view that as a result of GBV victims of sexual violence suffers physically,
psychologically and socially which affect their academic grades in school. Threats, harassment,
physical violence or fear of violence constrain victim’s life choices. This factors may adversely
affects victims’ health, self-esteem, anxiety, attendance in school, attentiveness in class and also
their motivation for schooling which may lead to low performance, depression by the affected
students and lack of interest with schooling. According to Florida (2001), children may
experience a wide range of emotions some of which may be new and therefore doubly
distressing. Students are thus insecure and afraid of the future.
13
Oliveira, Menezes & Oliveira (2018) on the other hand showed that bullying has a negative
impact on performance in mathematics and that social emotional skills can help students deal
with bullying. Mundbjerg et al. (2014) established a causal relationship between bullying in
elementary school and future outcomes in Denmark, establishing that bullied children have lower
academic achievement in 9th grade and that the effects are larger when bullying episodes are
more severe. When there are no SRGBV there can be good performance and the students will be
highly motivated in their school activities. When teachers demand sex from female students and
‘reward’ them for sex with high grades in tests and exams, the idea is perpetuated that academic
success is tied to girls’ sexuality rather than their intellect. Gender based violence in schools may
affect student’s social and psychological life negatively therefore affecting academic
performance. Based on the above indications, the conceptual framework is designed to show the
causal relationships being investigated between the different forms of school related gender
based violence and student academic performance measured in terms of grades achieved in UCE
AND UACE. Their interest with schooling and motivation were also considered to determine the
effects of school related gender based violence.
Leach (2008) classified gender based violence in schools in to two: explicit and implicit gender
violence. Explicit gender based violence as defined by Leach refer to cases that are overtly
sexual in nature, which may involve aggressive or unsolicited sexual advances or other forms of
sexual harassment which may include touching, pinching, grouping and verbal abuse, and acts of
intimidation, assault, forced sex and rape. On the other hand implicit gender violence cases are
defined as those which involve actions that are less visible and directly gendered. These happen
14
in daily school routines and activities that reinforce gender differentiation. Implicit gender
violence in schools according to Leach may include corporal punishment, or acts that indirectly
encourage violence.
According to WHO (2011), SRGBV may include acts such as verbal, physical, sexual,
psychological, emotional or symbolic violence. These include both bullying and cyber-bullying.
These are thus the ways in which experiences of, and vulnerabilities to, violence may take a
gender dimension. SRGBV thus may include individuals action or a society’s practice or
traditional. It may also include gendered expectations that negatively impact on the rights of
children with regard to access to education. It can take place through different paths: among
students themselves, or between students and teachers, and/or between family or community
members and students. The practice of SRGBV leads to an unsafe schooling environment and
can also lead to drop out from school.
Studies undertaken on different forms of gender based violence indicate that cases and forms of
gender based violence are not fixed, they evolve with time, and differ based on circumstances
and cultures (Reuters, 2002). Baldasare (2012) has also acknowledged that Patterns of GBV vary
from place to place, as do cultural and legal understandings of its acceptability. According to
Meyer (2008) sexual harassment may take on two distinctive forms. The first one involves
unwanted sexual attention such as jokes, touching, hugging, sending text messages through email
or the phone or even demanding for a date. The second one involves sexual coercion in return for
some benefits such as demands for sexual favours in order to pass an exam or get a promotion at
work. The two classifications by Meyer and Leach compare in that they categorize GBV based
on the extent of the crime and the likely effect on the victims.
15
15 to 71% of women reported experiencing physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate
partner at a certain instance in their lives, while another study by UNICEF (2009) found out that
globally nearly one third of adolescent girls worldwide reported that their first sexual experience
was forced, and almost half of all sexual assaults were against girls 15 years of age or younger.
An earlier UN study on Violence against Children in Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean also
asserts that this was a common phenomenon in these countries despite their level of civilization
(Pinheiro, 2006). Most of the victims are school going children below the age of 15 years. This
implies that global vulnerability to sexual assaults for the school going girl child world wide
requires understanding and measures to be put in place to counter it. Globally, cases of SRGBV
are highest in developing countries, with some of the most extreme rates in African countries
(Baldasare, 2012). Majority of these violence cases reported are committed within the school
environment.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, studies from at least nine countries, seven of these countries featured in a
USAID 2003 annotated bibliography of unsafe schools, the other two are from Benin (Wible,
2004) and Togo (Plan Togo, 2006) revealed a recurrent sexual abuse together with harassment
among school going children. This involved both boys and teachers, both gender repeatedly
indicated that some teachers in their schools abused their position of authority to demand sexual
favours from them in order to be awarded better/ good grades or in order to be accorded
preferential treatment in class or money or both. The study further established that despite the
attention given to such cases of teachers’ sexual misconduct, the evidence points to older
students being the main source of violence against girls. These studies however focused on
establishing the presence of SRGBV across different countries in Sub Saharan Africa without
consideration of the effects on victims’ academic performance.
A survey conducted by Rossetti (2001), among 560 students in Botswana found that 67% of the
students had experienced sexual harassment by teachers, some of whom were boys. Another
20% indicated that they have been asked for sex by teachers and 42% of them accepted to
comply for fear of the consequences if they refused. Another survey by Brown’s (2002) in Ghana
where 466 primary and secondary students were sampled found out that 13.5% of the girls and
16
4.2% of the boys had been victims of sexual abuse in school. This survey implies that GBV
affects both boys and girls with teachers being perpetrators.
In Ugandan schools, sexual abuse and harassment is therefore evident and can either be direct
such as forced sex or indirect such as punishments in schools. Variation in intensity, definitions
and manifestations differ based on culture and other sociodemographic factors but the motive
remains the same across (Githinji, 2011). This review also reveals that, although majority of the
GBV cases reported in schools are perpetrated by the teachers, some are also perpetrated by
students and also both genders are affected although the female gender is more vulnerable.
However the effects of these SRGBV have not been explored (Ruto & Chege, 2006). As seen
from this literature, both gender are affected although the magnitude of the effects is not known.
Therefore the current study will reveal statistics on extent to which each gender is affected on
academic performance in KCSE. This study sought to establish the trends in SRGBV and then
evaluate the measures put in place in Schools by different stakeholders to fight it.
Leach, et al. (2003) while studying on the impact of gendered experiences on retention and
achievement found that gender based violence in the form of sexual intimidation, verbal abuse
and physical assault was a significant contributor to irregular attendance and under achievement
of girls in school. Further, the study revealed that, pregnancy along with early marriage, are also
a major reason for girls’ drop-out since School girls who became pregnant rarely returned to
school.
A study done by Ruto (2009) on sexual abuse of school age children: evidence from Kenya by
purposively selecting 10 districts in Kenya found out that child sexual abuse was detrimental to
17
the child’s personal developmental growth. The study further revealed that learners’ school
participation suffered when knowledge that something happened between them and the teacher
spread. This would highly affect students’ concentration in academics therefore affect their
performance. If violation results in pregnancy, school attendance is automatically curtailed.
Efforts to get statistics on school girl pregnancies were unsuccessful. This study tried to establish
the link between GBV and issues related to education however, it does not establish a direct link
with classroom performance. The current study sought to identify and compare the academic
performance of students who have been victims of GBV with the rest of their colleagues who
have not.
Njoroge (2010) in a different study on the impact of gender based violence on girl child
education in Kinango District, Kenya revealed that, the existence of gender based violence in the
country denied girls the opportunity to attend school, participate effectively, compete and enjoy
quality education. Violence and abuse being prevalent at schools is a major hindrance to the
education of girls and negatively influencing their school performance. This study also brought
out the effect of GBV in terms of access, active participation and drop-out from school that
would reduce the chances of performance for the victims of GBV in schools although it focuses
more on girls and overlooks the boy child who is also a victim of sexual assault by their peers
and teachers. In the current study the focus was directly on how SRGBV affects students’
academic performance. Further the study examined GBV for both gender as opposed to Njoroge
(2010) who focused on girls alone.
18
range of other actions to prevent violence against children and to respond to it effectively if it
occurs. The focus of this report was general, not specific on the gender based violence especially
in schools which is one of the environments focused.
Five years later a follow-up study conducted UN (2011) dubbed the global update on violence
against children reiterated recommendations of 2006 study, as well as provided additional
recommendations that called on the provision of recovery and social reintegration services; to
ensure the participation of children; create accessible and child-friendly reporting systems and
services and address the gender dimension of violence against children; develop and implement
systematic national data collection and research efforts.
Though the reports increase awareness and disseminate information on violence against children
generally, the reports only briefly discuss violence in the school setting and hardly mention
school related gender based violence. UNESCO has published two gender-sensitive reference
materials to help teachers address school related gender based violence (Kozai, 2013). Kozai
further reiterates that though several states have implemented policies or programmes addressing
school related gender based violence through legislation or safe school initiatives, the majority of
states have not established an integrated or multi- sectoral plan to comprehensively address such
violence.
UNFPA (1999) states that the war against gender based violence can be won through, a multi-
sectoral team approach to prevent and respond appropriately to sexual and gender based
violence. The guiding manual further states that a committee or task force should be formed to
design implement and evaluate sexual violence programming at the field level. Some of the
measures put in place by UNFPA include: involvement of both gender in promoting a safe
environment, information, education and communication, protection of victims immediately
following an incident of sexual violence, medical care and psychosocial care to victims.
However, these measures are directed to victims in refugee camps. The nature of confinement in
refugee camps however can be closely related to that of schools especially with the restricted
movement and the accommodation of both genders in the same environment.
19
In Uganda, responses by education authorities to allegations of teacher sexual misconduct have
usually been marked by complacency and obfuscation and that government action has been
limited to tightening teachers’ codes of conduct and legislating to make sexual relations with
students a prosecutable offence (Njoroge, 2010). The lack of reliable statistical evidence with
which to convince policymakers of the need to take action, the silence surrounding what is seen
as a sensitive issue, traditional cultural views that find sex between older men and young girls
acceptable, and uncertainty among teachers, parents and children about how to report incidents
are contributing factors. Teachers are rarely expelled from the profession, even when the student
is pregnant; at most, the offending teacher is transferred to another school (Ruto, 2009).Indeed,
not all education officials, parents, teachers and the girls themselves disapprove of teachers
having sexual liaisons with their students, especially in rural areas where marriage to a man with
a government salary is much valued.
Majority of the studies reviewed have focused on the effects of GBV on developmental growth,
and also in drop out and stigma of the victims which is perceived to affect academic
performance. However, there is no clearly drawn link to show whether these translate to
academic performance especially on students who continue to stay in school after experiencing
GBV. This study therefore filled in the gaps in literature on how GBV in school affects students’
academic and social performance. Studies on GBV have also focused more on girls and
overlooked the boy child who is also a victim of sexual assault by their peers and also teachers.
Therefore, this study investigated GBV in both boys and girls. The study also identified ways in
which GBV in schools can be combated.
20
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the methodology adopted in conducting the study. The methodology is will
be presented in several sections: study design, study location, target population, sample and
sampling procedures, data collection tools, piloting of research tools, validity of the study,
reliability of research instruments, data collection procedure, data analysis, ethical and logical
considerations.
21
therefore they are better placed to provide information on the observed cases of gender based
violence in the past and how they affect them or their colleagues’ academic performance.
Guidance and counseling teachers on the other hand handle the cases of gender based violence
internally while principals handle the cases within the schools and externally with external
stakeholders.
22
Therefore, the student sample for the study will be 97 students. All the 18 principals and one
guidance and counseling teacher from each of the 18 sampled secondary schools will be selected
to take part in the study. The sample for the study will therefore be 133.
The sample distribution is shown on the sample matrix on Table 3.1.
The tool will help victims in disclosing confidential information without being identified. Hence
this tool was used for all categories of respondents. Anonymity in the use of questionnaires helps
to produce more candid answers and protect the student. However, questions will be adapted for
each category of respondent to suit the level of information they have on the subject. The
students’ questionnaire (Appendix I) comprised of structured and open ended and closed
questions, where section (A) had the general information while section (B) had questions about
school related gender based violence and the performance attributes. The principals
‘questionnaires (Appendix II) will also have two sections with section (A) dealing with personal
information while section (B) with five point likert-scales used to rate subjects’ opinions on the
23
form and extent of GBV and its effects on students academic performance. The Guidance and
Counseling teachers’ questionnaires (Appendix III) also solicited general information about the
respondents in the first section. Section two of the questionnaire will solicit for general
information about the respondents in the first section. Section two solicited information on the
different forms of GBV cases experienced. The third section will focus on causes while the
fourth section focused one establishing whether GBV affects students’ academic performance.
The last section will seek for measures to mitigate against the cases of GBV in schools.
24
3.7.2 Reliability
A research instrument is considered reliable when it yields consistent results upon different trials.
The pilot questionnaires were used to determine reliability of the data collection tools by testing
them using the Cronbach reliability coefficient. The instruments will yield alpha of 0.734 and
will be adopted for the study as they will be found to be reliable.
25
3.10 Ethical and Logical Considerations
3.10.1 Ethical Consideration
Ethical considerations will be observed in handling data and sharing of research findings.
Respondents will be assured of anonymity and utmost confidentiality of their opinions while at
the same time observing the necessary research regulations set in the country. Research permits
will be obtained and permission to conduct the research from all the schools sampled. To ensure
that maximum information is obtained from students, the researcher will administer the
questionnaires in an environment without teachers and the school administration and privacy will
highly be observed during disclosure of information.
26
REFERECES
Abuya, B, Onsomu, E., Moore. D., & Sagwe, J., (2012). A phenomenological study of sexual
harassment and violence among girls attending high schools in urban slums, Nairobi, Kenya,
Journal of School Violence, 1, (4), 323-344.
Brown, K. (2002). A study on sexual abuse in schools in Ghana. Cape Coast: University of Cape
Coast/UNICEF Ghana.
Draugalis J., Coons S., Plaza C. (2008). Best practices for survey research reports: A synopsis
for authors and reviewers. Am J Pharm Educ, 1(72), 23 - 45.
Dunne, M., Humphreys, S. & Leach, F. (2006). Gender violence in schools in the developing
world. Journal of Gender and Education, 18(1), 75–98.
Dunne, M., Leach F., & Salvi, F. (2014). School‐related gender‐based violence: A global review
of current issues and approaches in policy, programming and implementation responses to
School‐ Related Gender‐Based Violence (SRGBV) for the Education Sector. Background
research paper prepared for UNESCO.
Ellis, J. (2014). Preventing violence against women and girls: A study of educational
programmes for children and young people. United States: Policy Press.
27
Fraser, E. (2012) Helpdesk Research Report: Risks, effects and prevalence of VAWG. London:
Governance and Social Development Research Centre.
Gachiru , B (2010). The impact of gender based violence on girl child education in Kinango
District, Kenya. Acced at http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke: 8080/ handle/ 123456789/4992 on
3/23/2016.
Githinji, P. (2011). Sexual abuse of children: A study of primary school pupils in Nakuru
municipality, Kenya. Published Masters Thesis, Kenyatta University.
Heise, L., Ellsberg, M., & Gottmoeller, M., (2002). A global overview of genderbased violence.
International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1(3) 5–14.
Joint Programme on Sexual and Gender Based Violence (2011). In-depth study on reasons for
high incidence of sexual and gender based violence in Liberia Recommendations on Prevention
and Response. Swedish International Development Cooperation (SIDA): Stockholm.
Kilonzo, M. (2013). Release of the 2012 KCSE examination results by the. Minister for
Education Friday, 1st March 2013 Minister for Education, Hon. Mutula Kilonzo, on Friday, 1st
March 2013.
Kilonzo, M. (2013). Speech on release of the 2012 KCSE examination results by the Minister for
Education. Nairobi: Mtihani House.
Leach, F. & Machakanja, P. (2000). A preliminary investigation into the abuse of girls in
Zimbabwean Junior Secondary Schools.Education Research. 39, 24–35.
Leach, F. & Machakanja, P. (2003). An investigative study into the Abuse of girls in African
Schools. London: DfID.
28
Leach, F. &Máiréad, D.(2013). A global review of current issues and approaches in policy,
programming and implementation responses to School Related Gender-Based Violence
(SRGBV) for UNESCO Education Sector, Sussex: University of Sussex.
Mathiu, M. (2008). No party is innocent in school fires tragedy. Daily Nation of July 26, 2008.
Nairobi: Nation Media.
Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, A. (2003). Research method: Quantitative and qualitative approaches.
Nairobi: Nairobi African Center for Technology.
NGO Advisory Council (2011) Global update on violence against children. Paris: United
Nations.
Oliveira, F., Menezes, T., &Oliveira, G. (2018) Bullying Effect on Student’s performance.
Economia.19 (1), 57-73.
Pinheiro, P. (2006). World report on violence against children. Geneva: United Nations. Plan &
Child Helpline International (2011). Using Child Helplines to Protect Children from School
Violence. London: Plan International.
Plan Togo (2006). Suffering to Succeed? Violence and abuse in schools in Togo. Accessed at
www.planinternational.org/pdfs/sufferingtosucceed.pdf on 2 January 2015.
Rossetti, S. (2001). Children in school: A safe place? In Development & Training Services, Inc.
and Wellesley Centers for Research on Women. Washington DC: U. S. Agency for International
Development.
29
Ruto J. (2009). Sexual abuse of school age children: Evidence from Kenya. CICE Hiroshima
University, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 12(1) 177-192.
Ruto, J. & Chege, R. (2006). Violence against girls as a structural barrier to her right to and in
education.Nairobi: Action Aid Kenya.
Sang, J. (2008). The preparedness of secondary school head teachers as leaders and managers of
schools in Kenya. Moi University: Eldoret.
United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative. United Nations (2006).World Report On Violence
against Children. Paris: United Nations.
United Nations Children’s Fund, (2009). Machel Study 10-Year Strategic Review: Children and
Conflict in a Changing World. Accessed at:
http://www.un.org/children/conflict/machel/_download/msr2_en.pdf on 6/1/2013
Wible, B. (2004). Making schools safe for girls: Combating gender-based violence in Benin.
Washington, DC: US Academy for Educational Development.
World Health Organization (2011) Violence against women: Intimate partner and sexual
violence against women. fact sheet No. 239. Accessed at:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/index.html on 1/15/ 2013.
Wubs, G, Leif. E, Alan J, Sheri B., Hans O., Sylvia K., and Catherine, M. (2009). Dating
violence among school students in Tanzania and South Africa: Prevalence and socio-
demographic variations. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37(2),75-86.
30