Anthonys Summative Westminster Evaluation
Anthonys Summative Westminster Evaluation
Signature:
Performance Indicators: 0 – Not Effective 1 – Beginning 2 – Developing 3 – Preservice Effective (NA – Not Applicable)
Please see Utah Institutions of Higher Education Preservice Teacher Evaluation Rubric for description of each indicator
Standard 1: Learner Development
Rating
The teacher understands cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional and physical areas of student development.
The teacher: Comments and Suggestions: Anthony has a good relationship with the students in his
1.1 Creates developmentally appropriate and
classroom which gives him great insight into their needs as learners. He knows which students
challenging learning experiences based on each are likely to understand the math concept for the day, and which students he's going to need
learner’s strengths, interests, and needs (1a, to pull into a small group for a second hit. He has strengthened the rigor through his own
2e). personal growth that allows learners to stretch and grow.
InTASC 1 One of his strengths is collaborating with others, whether it’s families or colleagues, because
he comes from a relationship point of view. His kindness and compassion help in building
3 CAEP 1.1, 3.5 those relationships that have lead to trust from students, parents, and colleagues. Even
1.2 Collaborates with families, colleagues, and though he has only been in the building for a few months other teachers feel comfortable as
other professionals to promote student growth he asks questions, discusses life in the classroom, or what his weekend was like.
and development (1b).
InTASC 1
CAEP 1.1, 3.5
Standard 2: Learning Differences
Rating
The teacher understands individual learner differences and cultural and linguistic diversity.
The teacher: Comments and Suggestions: Something he’s learned is to factor in the needs of his ELL
2.1 Allows learners multiple ways to
students where their learning often can’t keep pace with their language skills. He slows down,
demonstrate learning sensitive to diverse restates it, or allows them to work with others to show what they know. That has made a big
3
experiences, while holding high expectations for difference with many of his students. I’ve often heard him ask a student to do more because
all (2a, 2b, 2c, 2d). InTASC 2 CAEP 1.1, 3.5 they can. Anthony, it’s far too easy for us as teachers to narrow our field of view as we teach.
Keep reminding yourself to check the corners to see which students are learning.
Standard 3: Learning Environments
Rating The teacher works with learners to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, social interactions, active engagement in
learning, and self-motivation.
The teacher: Comments and Suggestions: Your students are really engaaged during the times they are using
3.1 Develops learning experiences that engage and the response flipcards, white boards, and Nearpods because they can show what they know
support students as self-directed learners who on an individual basis. Even though you discovered that putting student desks in tables so
internalize classroom routines, expectations, and they can work and collaborate did not work at that particular time continue preparing them
procedures (3)InTASC # for when they will be. You've discovered that you can have students collaborate anywhere in
the room, and that's working well for you and them. Putting students of differing interest and
3 3.2 Collaborates with students to establish a abilities together works because you know your students. Thank you for labeling student
positive learning climate of openness, respectful
interactions, support, and inquiry (3b).InTASC conduct as disrespectful and then taking the time to explain the WHY so they understand and
learn. One of your best strategies is the use of proximity when you need to help a student
3.3 Utilizes positive classroom management improve behavior or learning.
strategies, including the resources of time, space,
and attention, effectively (3c, 3d). InTASC 3
Standard 5: Assessment
Rating The teacher uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, monitor learner progress, guide planning and instruction, and
determine whether the outcomes described in content standards have been met.
The teacher: Comments and Suggestions You began the year using just the CFAs and assessments your
5.1 Uses data sources to assess the
grade level was using. It was overwhelming. As the year went on and you discovered you
effectiveness of instruction and to make were doing most and then all of your own planning I saw you developing your own strategies
3 adjustments in planning and instruction (5a, 5c, to use the data to change instruction. That's exactly what I wanted you to do. You caught the
5d, 8a).InTASC 6 excitement of using data to inform instruction. Powerful!
5.2 Documents student progress and provides It was a good thing that your grade level had many CFAs and assessments that were already in
descriptive feedback to student, place, however, you have been able to design your own to share with the team that have been
parent/guardian, and other stakeholders in a very successful. I especially appreciated your insight as to when assessments and instruction
variety of ways (5b, 5e).InTASC 6 weren't matching so you could adjust things. It took some time for you to have the courage to
branch out on your own to do some of your own CFAs, but I think that's when you became
5.3 Designs or selects pre-assessments, hooked on different ways to assess. You'll never look back now!
formative, and summative assessments in a
variety of formats that align to learning
objectives and engage the learner in
demonstrating knowledge and skills
(5a).InTASC 6
The teacher: Comments and Suggestions Remember that sometimes the I CAN statements for math and
6.1 Demonstrates knowledge of the Utah Core
literacy you post on the board for students are really more for you, the teacher. It's your way
Standards and references them in short- and to check that you are sticking to the standards as you teach. Refer to them if you've taken the
long-term planning (4b, 6a).nTASC 7 time to write them up there, if you don't, then don't take the time to write them on the board.
3 You are taking the time to think about ways to bring more to your lesson than just what is in
6.2 Integrates cross-disciplinary skills into the texts, Wonders and Go Math, so more students can deepen their background knowledge.
instruction to purposefully engage learners in That's vital for our population so keep it up.
applying content knowledge (6b, 6e). InTASC 7
08/16/2017Performance Indicators: 0 – Not Effective 1 – Beginning 2 – Developing 3 – Preservice Effective (NA – Not Applicable)
Standard 10: Professional and Ethical Behavior
Rating
The teacher demonstrates the highest standard of legal, moral, and ethical conduct in compliance with federal and state rules and laws.
The teacher: Comments and Suggestions All of these listed here are things that are just part of you. You
10.1 Is responsible for compliance with
have high standards for yourself, and will teach your students the same. You are going to be
university policies, federal and state laws, State an asset to any school or district you belong to.
Board of Education administrative rules, state
assessment policies, local board policies, and
supervisory directives (10a, 5f). InTASC 9 CAEP
1.1, 1.4, 3.3, 3.5, 3.6
3
10.2 Is responsible for compliance with all requirements of State Board of Education Rule R277-530 at all levels of teacher development (10b). InTASC 9 CAEP 1.1, 1.4, 3.3, 3.5, 3.6
GOALS: Pre COVID-19 Goals: Further develop use of assessment based instruction by increasing the frequency of exit tickets and formative
assessments to three times per week for both reading and math instruction. Post COVID-19 Goals: Increase student engagement in online
instruction materials through frequent (weekly) contact and creation of easy to access and use material. Increase the rigor of online instruction
through the use of video learning module creation and frequent assessments.
GENERAL COMMENTS: Anthony is an outstanding intern teacher who will quickly become a master teacher. He has dedicated himself to learning
everything he can about how to best educate students through his university studies, working as an intern with a coach, and collaborating with his
colleagues.
He has spent countless hours with learning the basics of classroom management, and then successfully managed the whole classroom including one
student who pushed the boundaries for every single adult in our building. Classroom management has been an area of teaching that Anthony has
worked hard to understand and implement. He has asked questions, asked for help, and celebrated the successes with his students, parents, and
other teachers. He has learned excellent management practices.
Intern teachers are always surprised by the amount of time and effort it takes to learn curriculum and how to plan and prepare. Anthony has been
more than willing to take the necessary time to learn how to plan, prepare and instruct. He has always been willing to ask for help so that he can
learn everything he can that will improve his skills. He has begun to share his ideas with his team, push himself to learn more, and actively
participate in everything our school is doing.
Technology is one of Anthony’s strengths. He is quick to share his knowledge with his students, as well as with other adults in our school. His
students know he is always able to help them navigate the programs they work on and as a result there just seems to be less tension while Chrome
Books are being used. I’ve come to count on him to be my tech guy and sent him to help others. He is always willing and cheerful about it, but
most importantly, he teaches! He doesn’t just do it for you.
Rarely have I seen a teacher as motivated and exceptional as Anthony. He is truly one of a kind. I have been honored to be his coach.
08/16/2017Performance Indicators: 0 – Not Effective 1 – Beginning 2 – Developing 3 – Preservice Effective (NA – Not Applicable)