Kart Steering, Physical Forces and Setup - Theory and Practice
Kart Steering, Physical Forces and Setup - Theory and Practice
by James Hughes
Often when asking questions about chassis and steering settings, the usual answer is simply to
say changing some setting or other causes an increase or decrease in grip. There is never an
explanation of the physical principles involved in causing these changes. I hope in this article to
explain the physical forces involved in driving a kart, along with how those forces are generated
by the steering, and what the effect is on the track of changing the various parameters available
as setup.
Although a kart may seem to be rather simple device, it is perhaps a more difficult subject to
explain than an equivalent car. Both vehicles have many parts and principles in common but
there two major differences, which account for a large divergence in design and in setting up.
These differences are the karts lack of differential, and also its lack of any suspension
components.
A good knowledge of the forces involved can help greatly when setting up a kart - giving the
mechanic some knowledge as to what should happen when a parameter is changed. This
should result in considerably less time spent on the track testing.
Steering Geometry
The steering geometry can be regarded at the movement and displacement of the front wheels
as the steering wheel is turned. This movement is quite complex, and involves a number of
different settings. There is one thing in common though, and that is the reason why we need a
complicated geometry - We MUST lift the inside wheel while cornering.
The inside wheel lift is what enables a kart to go round a corner without using a differential.
Because of this lack of a differential, a karts natural direction of travel, forwards, is very difficult
to change. This is down to the differing radii of turn experienced by the inner and outer rear
wheels while turning a corner. The inside wheel is actually travelling a shorter distance than the
outside, so therefor is needs to take fewer revolutions to go round the corner. However, the two
rear wheels are attached by a solid axle, and must therefor move together, so in order to turn,
one of the wheels need to skid over the track surface. In a car, the differential will allow the
wheels to turn at different rates, without this skidding action.
This skidding action, or indeed the lack of it, is what make a stationary kart so difficult to turn
round - you have to overcome the grip of one of the tyres, and with the sticky tyres used in
many kart classes this can expend a lot of energy.
This is the reason for lifting the inside wheel and it effectively turns the kart into a tricycle during
the cornering process! The steering geometry causes the inner rear wheel to lift off the ground
while cornering, which means the wheel can rotate faster than it is passing over the ground. The
rear inner wheel is no longer touching the track, and we therefor no longer need to overcome
the grip from that tyre in order to turn.
In fact, depending on the power of the engine, we may be able to allow some scrub. For
example, while a Prokart may need to entirely lift the inner wheel, because it does not have
enough power to overcome the scrub, a more powerful kart may have power to spare in the
corner, meaning that the power loss to scrub can be overcome. However, any scrub will start to
cause understeer when entering a corner, so even though the engine may be powerful, it may
still be necessary to completely lift the inner rear to maintain decent handling.
However, we haven't yet explained how the front geometry can affect the rear wheel lift, and in
order to do this, lets define a few terms used when describing front end geometry.
• Camber. This is the degree to which the front wheel
lean in (or out) from each other. A camber setting of
0 means that both tyres sit flat on the track.
Maximising the amount of rubber on the track is one
of the aims of kart setup.
To help explain how the front geometries affect the rear inside wheel, lets assume that the
chassis is completely rigid - it is so stiff that it cannot bend in any direction. This assumption
makes things a little easier to understand. Kart chassis are not actually this stiff - they flex in a
number of areas. However, the differing effects caused by differing stiffness' in various parts of
the chassis are beyond the scope of this article.
When we turn a corner, the steering geometry (but mainly the caster setting and scrub radius)
causes the inside wheel to move down in relationship to the chassis, and the outside wheel to
move up. As this happen, because our chassis is rigid, it pivots around a line from the inside
front and outside rear, causing the inside rear to lift!
OK, so we have now explained how the front geometry is used to raise the inner rear wheel
during cornering. There a quite a few other forces that come in to effect one a corner has been
initiated, and that is what we will talk about next
Karting 'Forces'
During Acceleration/Deceleration
While Cornering
During cornering the driver feels like he is being pushed outwards from the kart. This is actually
wrong, he is not being throw out but is simply trying to move in a straight line. The tyres of the
kart are producing a grip which imparts an angular acceleration on the kart (and driver), forcing
the kart to corner. It is this angular acceleration that the driver feels. The force which the ground
imparts on the kart to make it corner is known as the Centripetal force, and it always acts at
towards the centre of the imaginary circle we are cornering round. It important to remember that
there is NO SUCH THING as centrifugal force.
The further this wheel is from the centreline of the kart (and therefor the centre of inertia), the
greater the turning moment, and the more likely the kart is the overcome the grip of the tyre on
the track . This causes the back to break away - oversteer when accelerating and understeer
when braking.
Understeer at first, then a sudden grip of front which pulls you into the turn, and possibly
going into oversteer.
This is usually explained by insufficient lifting on the inside wheel, causing the initial understeer.
As the car starts to turn, weight transfer through centripetally caused torque on the chassis lifts
the inside rear. Unfortunately, you now have so much steering lock on trying to initiate the turn,
that once the inside rear lifts, the fronts are turned so far that massive oversteer usually results.
This can often be mistaken for a lack of rear end grip, since the final sensation is one of
oversteer, but it in fact almost the opposite, since it's too much grip on the inside rear which is
the main culprit.
We can use the steering geometry to cure this problem. As we showed above, increasing caster
causes the inside front to move down further, thereby increasing inside rear lift. Also, moving
the front wheels out on their stub axle (increasing the scrub radius) gives a greater effect, with
the same result. Also, increasing the Ackerman effect can have an influence on this - making
the inside wheel turn further and therefor move further down.
Oversteer
This is where on turning the wheel, the kart immediately and rapidly changes direction, the rear
end breaks away, which results in a spin, or rear end slide.
This is down to insufficient rear end grip - as the turn is started, the inside wheel lifts, but the
outside rear is unable to cope with the extra cornering forces involved, and breaks away. So we
either have approached the corner too fast - and hence corner forces have overcome the grip of
the tyre, or the tyre isn't producing the required grip level.
If the inside wheel is lifting a long way, this can causes grip problem since the tyre is at a larger
angle to the track. Kart tyres do not react well to large angles of attack (unlike road or car race
tyres which are able to distort to a greater extent because of a lower profile ratio), and this
reduces grip. Reducing caster may reduce initial lift, but may also detrimentally affect initial turn
in. Since the centripetal force acting on the kart overrides the caster settings while corning,
there is probably a problem with the chassis more than the front geometry. It is flexing too far
and allowing the rear too far off the track. Moving the rear hubs outwards can improve this
situation, since a wider stance makes it harder for the centripetal forces to lift the inside rear,
thereby decreasing the amount it will lift in any given corner.
If the back breaks away under braking or acceleration, then its possible that our rears are too
far apart, which increases the rotational torque under changes of speed. Since this is most
noticeable in wet weather, its is more fully described in the next section.
It could be that our tyre is running at the wrong pressure - and is therefor not at the right
temperature to produce the required grip level. Tyre pressures are an arcane science that also
won't be explored here, so the best option is to try different pressures during testing, once initial
handling has been sorted out.
Wet Weather.
This is where things get (even more) complicated. The ultimate aim is the same, but because of
various changed factors, there are some alterations to make…
In the wet, we are cornering much more slowly, and we cannot accelerate as fast, or brake as
heavily because of the lower grip levels available.
Lower corner speed means we do not get the same level of centripetal force during cornering,
so the inside rear may not lift correctly. Moving the front wheels outwards emphasises the
twisting effect induced by caster, improving initial turn in. In effect the front geometry has more
of an effect throughout the corner in wet weather than in dry, where it is overshadowed by the
centripetal forces.
Because we still have the same amount of power available, in low grip conditions the rotational
torque caused on power application can exceed the grip levels more easily, causing rapid spin
out. Moving the rear wheels in reduces this torque, so more power can be applied without
breaking rear end grip. Some people refer to moving the rears inwards as increasing grip. This
is not strictly true - the grip level remains the same, but the power can be applied more
efficiently along the chassis, giving forward acceleration, rather than as a rotation torque which
can cause spin out.
Other problems
You are sure to encounter many other problems with handling, but there isn't the space to go
into them all here. However, hopefully the information presented should now be enough to
make an educated guess as to the causes of any problems.
Summary
You will have guessed by now that we have described an optimal set of parameters for the kart
geometry and wheel setup. Of course this never happens - tyre grip level change according to
the circuit, weather, and the whim of the manufacturer, some circuits are mostly large radius
corners while other are very twisty. What we need is to get to a setup that sits in the mid range
of acceptable parameters, and adjust along this range for a particular circuit. For example, on a
low grip circuit (or in cold weather) we may want to increase the caster to improve initial turn in.
In very cold weather we may want to increase toe in, forcing the tyres to scrub, and therefor
warm up faster to the required grip level. However, this can cause other handling problems,
which may need to be over come.
The most important thing is to ensure that the inner rear contributes little or no grip in order to
improve handling and reduce scrub and hence power loss. This is so important to keeping up
speed through the corner, and makes handling so much more manageable.
However, we can also see from the explanations above that changing some settings can affect
more that one area. For example, changing the distance between the rear wheels affects both
weight transfer across the kart, and the rotation torque caused by accelerating or braking while
cornering. Setting the kart up, even with of good knowledge of why a particular change works,
still requires a certain amount of track time, although hopefully with the additional knowledge
presented here, this track time can be greatly reduced.
Acknowlegements
Thanks also to the following people who helped (usually via the UK Karting website,
www.karting.co.uk)
Neil Dodson, Brian Kavanagh, Brian Pollard, Martin Capenhurst, Peter Holroyd