Track II Diplomacy or "Backchannel Diplomacy" H Istory: Joseph V. Montville
Track II Diplomacy or "Backchannel Diplomacy" H Istory: Joseph V. Montville
History
Meaning:
What:
track 2 diplomacy
is the practice of
Aim:
Why:
- Montville emphasized that Track Two Diplomacy is not a substitute for Track
One Diplomacy, but compensates for the constraints imposed on leaders by
their people’s psychological expectations.
Montville maintains that there are two basic processes in track two diplomacy.
A. The first consists of facilitated workshops that bring members of conflicting
groups together to develop personal relationships, understand the conflict
from the perspective of others, and develop joint strategies for solving the
conflict.
B. The second process involves working to shift public opinion: "Here the task
is a psychological one which consists of reducing the sense of victim hood of
the parties and rehumanizing the image of the adversary
Winter 1981-1982
In Foreign Policy, Montville and Davidson, put the term “track II diplomacy” in print for the
first time. “Its underlying assumption,” they write, “is that actual or potential conflict can
and reasonableness.”
1989
The American Academy of Arts and Sciences hosts the first of a series of conferences
bringing together Arab and Israeli participants to discuss possible solutions to the Israeli-
Palestinian conflict. The meetings snowball into the first major effort to put Track II into
practice, laying the groundwork for the landmark 1993 Oslo Accords.
1991
The Soviet Union collapses, leaving diplomatic institutions like the United Nations, forged in
an era of great-power conflict, poorly suited to keeping the post-Cold War peace.
With the United States and North Korea on the brink of a nuclear crisis, former President
Jimmy Carter journeys to Pyongyang to extract Kim Il Sung’s promise to halt his nuclear
program. “It was a triumph of Track II diplomacy,” Carter exemplifies the rise in Track II
circles of what might be called the Track 1.5 diplomat, an ex-official who meets on behalf
U.S. Ambassador Marc Grossman tells an audience at Foggy Bottom that “Track II
2017
Once a fringe notion, Track II is now taught in 99 conflict resolution graduate programs in
1 ) China
The Peacemakers: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, and others
Several organizations began bringing U.S. and Chinese defense officials to the table
unofficially after tensions rose over the 1999 U.S. bombing of the Chinese Embassy in
Belgrade and the 2001 spy-plane incident. The meetings have helped ease tensions even
as China has begun flexing its military might in the greater Pacific region.
2 ) Kashmir
Kashmiris of the long-running conflict for the first time in decades in 2004; a formal peace
3 ) North Korea
The Players: China, Japan, North Korea, Russia, South Korea, and the United States
When six-party nonproliferation talks stalled in 2005, the NCAFP kept the conversation
Kissinger) in New York that mirrored the talks themselves, only without the lofty stakes