Political Law Review Notes Up To Suffrage PDF
Political Law Review Notes Up To Suffrage PDF
Based on the syllabus and lectures of Atty. Bong Lopez (Compiled by RYAN JAMES S. EDQUILAG)
The digested cases will serve as guide for the topics. Reading the full text of the cases is encouragingly advised.
j. United Nations Convention on the Law Section 4. This Act, together with the
of the Seas (UNCLOS) I, II and III geographic coordinates and the chart and
maps indicating the aforesaid baselines,
In UNCLOS I, it codified the sovereign shall be deposited and registered with the
right of States over the territorial seas of Secretary General of the United Nations.
archipelagic and coastal states.
Province of North Cotabato v.
In UNCLOS II, this convention sought to Government of the Republic of the
determine the breadth of territorial seas Philippines Peace Panel on Ancestral
which went undetermined in UNCLOS I, Domain (GRP)
G. R. No. 183591, 14 October 2008
but no new agreements were made.
568 SCRA 402
In UNCLOS III, it prescribes the water- Facts:
land ratio, length and contour of baselines The Government of the Republic of the
of archipelagic states and sets the Philippines Peace Panel on Ancestral Domain
deadline for the filing of application for (GRP) is scheduled to sign the memorandum
the extended continental shelf. of agreement on the ancestral domain (MOA-
AD) with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front
k. Republic Act No. 9522 (demarcation of (MILF) in lieu of the continuing negotiations
maritime zone and continental shelf under between them with respect to the previous
hostilities throughout recent history.
UNCLOS III)
However, the signing was postponed due to
the filing of petitions questioning the
Section 2. The baseline in the following constitutionality of the MOA-AD. The
areas over which the Philippines likewise Province of North Cotabato and other
exercises sovereignty and juris- petitioners contended that a copy of the MOA-
diction shall be determined as AD must be disclosed and copies of the same
"Regime of Islands" under the Republic must be furnished to them, invoking the right
of the Philippines consistent with Article to information on matters of public concern.
121 of the United Nations Convention on Subsequent petitions were filed, seeking the
the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS): exclusion of several cities from the
Bangsamoro Juridical Entity and declaring
the MOA-AD null and void. Some other
a) The Kalayaan Island Group as petitions questioned the constitutionality of
constituted under Presidential Decree No. the said agreement and seeking the exclusion
1596; and of the local government units where they
represent or are affiliated with.
b) Bajo de Masinloc, also known as
Scarborough Shoal. Issue:
Whether or not the provisions under the
Section 3. This Act affirms that the MOA-AD, having an associated state, is in
Republic of the Philippines has dominion, accordance with the Constitution.
sovereignty and jurisdiction over all
Held:
portions of the national territory as No.
defined in the Constitution and by No province, city, or municipality, not even
provisions of applicable laws including, the ARMM, is recognized under our laws as
without limitation, Republic Act No. 7160, having an “associative” relationship with the
national government. Indeed, the concept
implies powers that go beyond anything ever of the baselines to maritime passage by all
granted by the Constitution to any local or vessels and aircrafts, undermining Philippine
regional government. It also implies the sovereignty and national security,
recognition of the associated entity as a state. contravening the country’s nuclear-free policy,
The Constitution, however, does not and damaging marine resources, in violation
contemplate any state in this jurisdiction of relevant constitutional provisions. In
other than the Philippine State, much less addition, they contend that RA 9522’s
does it provide for a transitory status that treatment of the KIG as “regime of islands”
aims to prepare any part of Philippine not only results in the loss of a large maritime
territory for independence. area but also prejudices the livelihood of
subsistence fishermen.
Even the mere concept animating many of the
MOA-AD’s provisions, therefore, already Issue:
requires for its validity the amendment of Whether or not Republic Act No. 9522 is
constitutional provisions, specifically the unconstitutional.
following provisions of Article X:
Held:
“SECTION 1. The territorial and political No.
subdivisions of the Republic of the Philippines UNCLOS III has nothing to do with the
are the provinces, cities, municipalities, and acquisition (or loss) of territory. It is a
barangays. There shall be autonomous regions multilateral treaty regulating, among others,
in Muslim Mindanao and the Cordilleras as sea-use rights over maritime zones (i.e., the
hereinafter provided. territorial waters [12 nautical miles from the
baselines], contiguous zone [24 nautical miles
SECTION 15. There shall be created from the baselines], exclusive economic zone
autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and [200 nautical miles from the baselines]), and
in the Cordilleras consisting of provinces, continental shelves that UNCLOS III
cities, municipalities, and geographical areas delimits. UNCLOS III was the culmination of
sharing common and distinctive historical and decades-long negotiations among United
cultural heritage, economic and social Nations members to codifynorms regulating
structures, and other relevant characteristics the conduct of States in the world’s oceans and
within the framework of this Constitution and submarine areas, recognizing coastal and
the national sovereignty as well as territorial archipelagic States’ graduated authority over
integrity of the Republic of the Philippines. a limited span of waters and submarine lands
along their coasts.
Magallona v. Ermita
G. R. No. 187167, 16 August 2011 On the other hand, baselines laws such as RA
655 SCRA 476 9522 are enacted by UNCLOS III States
parties to mark-out specific basepoints along
Facts: their coasts from which baselines are drawn,
Prof. Merlin Magallona and other petitioners either straight or contoured, to serve as
filed their petition questioned the geographic startingpoints to measure the
constitutionality of Republic Act No. 9522, breadth of the maritime zones and continental
which adjusted the country’s archipelagic shelf. Article 48 of UNCLOS III on
baselines and classifying the baseline regime archipelagic States like ours could not be any
of nearby territories, on two principal clearer:
grounds, namely: (1) RA 9522 reduces
Philippine maritime territory, and logically, “Article 48. Measurement of the breadth of the
the reach of the Philippine state’s sovereign territorial sea, the contiguous zone, the
power, in violation of Article 1 of the 1987 exclusive economic zone and the continental
Constitution, embodying the terms of the shelf.—The breadth of the territorial sea, the
Treaty of Paris and ancillary treaties, and (2) contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone
RA 9522 opens the country’s waters landward and the continental shelf shall be measured
the people for a term of six years which development, shall be afforded the
shall begin at noon on the thirtieth day of citizen, subject to such limitations as
June next following the day of the election may be provided by law.
and shall end at noon of the same date,
six years thereafter. The President shall D. Government
not be eligible for any re-election. No
person who has succeeded as President 1. Definition
and has served as such for more than four
years shall be qualified for election to the - Section 2(1) of the Introductory
same office at any time. Provisions of Executive Order No. 292,
series of 1987, otherwise known as the
xxx Administrative Code of the Philippines,
defines the Government of the Republic of
(Article XVI, Section 2) the Philippines.
assigning them to some other charitable $80,000 were not included therein, it is said
purpose or institution. The secretary could not that the right to recover this amount did not,
dispose ofany of the funds in this manner so therefore, pass to the present sovereign. This,
long as they were necessary for the specific in our opinion, does not follow as a necessary
purpose for which they were contributed. The consequence, as the right to recover does not
secretary had the power, under the law above rest upon the proposition that the $80,000
mentioned to appoint and totally or partially must be "other immovable property"
change the personnel of the relief board and to mentioned in article 8 of the treaty, but upon
authorize the board to defend the rights of the contractual obligations incurred before the
charity in the courts. The authority of the Philippine Islands were ceded to the United
board consisted only in carrying out the will of States. We will now inquire what effect this
the donors as directed by the Government cession had upon the law of June 20, 1849, the
whose duty it was to watch over the acts of the royal decree of April 27, 1875, and the
board and to see that the funds were applied instructions promulgated on the latter date.
to the purposes for which they were In Vilas vs. Manila (220 U. S., 345), the court
contributed. The secretary of the interior, as said:
the representative of His Majesty's
Government, exercised these powers and "That there is a total abrogation of the former
duties through the Governor-General of the political relations of the inhabitants of the
Philippine Islands. The Governments of Spain ceded region is obvious. That all laws
and of the Philippine Islands in complying theretofore in force which are in conflict with
with their duties conferred upon them by law, the political character, constitution, or
acted in their governmental capacities in institutions of the substituted sovereign, lose
attempting to carry out the intention of the their force, is also plain. (Alvarez y Sanchez
contributors. It will thus be seen that those vs. United States, 216 U. S., 167.) But it is
governments were something more, as we equally settled in the same public law that
have said, than mere trustees of the fund. that great body of municipal law which
regulates private and domestic rights
It is further contended that the obligation on continues in force until abrogated or changed
the part of the Monte de Piedad to return the by the new ruler."
$80,000 to the Government, even considering
it a loan, was wiped out on the change of If the above-mentioned legal provisions are in
sovereignty, or in other words, the present conflict with the political character,
Philippine Government cannot maintain this constitution or institutions of the new
action for that reason. This contention, if true, sovereign, they became inoperative or lost
"must result from settled principles of rigid their force upon the cession of the Philippine
law," as it cannot rest upon any title to the Islands to the United States, but if they are
fund in the Monte de Piedad acquired prior to among "that great body of municipal law
such change. While the obligation to return which regulates private and domestic rights,"
the $80,000 to the Spanish Government was they continued in force and are still in force
still pending, war between the United States unless they have been repealed by the present
and Spain ensued. Under the Treaty of Paris Government. That they fall within the latter
of December 10, 1898, the Archipelago, known class is clear from their very nature and
as the Philippine Islands, was ceded to the character. They are laws which are not
United States, the latter agreeing to pay political in any sense of the word. They
Spain the sum of $20,000,000. Under the first conferred upon the Spanish Government the
paragraph of the eighth article, Spain right and duty to supervise, regulate, and to
relinquished to the United States "all some extent control charities and charitable
buildings, wharves, barracks, forts, institutions.
structures, public highways, and other
immovable property which, in conformity with The present sovereign, in exempting
law, belonged to the public domain, and as "provident institutions, savings banks, etc.,"
such belonged to the crown of Spain." As the all of which are in the nature of charitable
institutions, from taxation, placed such into the exercise thereof. (Cruz, Philippine
institutions, in so far as the investment in Political Law, 2014 edition, p. 40)
securities are concerned, under the general
supervision of the Insular Treasurer a. Criteria for legitimacy
(paragraph 4 of section 111 of Act No. 1189;
see also Act No. 701).
(1) It is established according to the basic
Furthermore, upon the cession of the law of the land
Philippine Islands the prerogatives of the
crown of Spain devolved upon the United (2) It has the general support of the
States. In Magill vs. Brown (16 Fed. Cas., people.
408), quoted with approval in Mormon Church
vs. United States (136 U. S., 1, 57), the court (3) It is entitled to recognition and
said: rightful supremacy. (Zulueta, p. 41)
"The Revolution devolved on the State all the
5. De facto government, kinds and
transcendent power of Parliament, and the
prerogative of the crown, and gave their Acts
characteristics
the same force and effect."
A de facto government is a government of
Chancelor Kent says: fact, that is, it actually exercises power or
control but without legal title.(Cruz,
"In this country, the legislature or government Philippine Political Law, 2014 edition, p.
of the State, as parens patriæ, has the right to 40)
enforce all charities of a public nature, by
virtue of its general superintending authority a. Kinds
over the public interests, where no other
person is entrusted with it." (4 Kent Com.,
508, note.) The Supreme Court of the United
(1) The government that gets possession
States in Mormon Church vs. United States, and control of, or usurps, by force or by
supra, after approving also the last the voice of the majority, the rightful legal
quotations, said: government and maintains itself against
the will of the latter.
"This prerogative of parens patriæ is inherent
in the supreme power of every State, whether (2) That established as an independent
that power is lodged in a royal person or in the government by the inhabitants of a
legislature, and has no affinity to those country who rise in insurrection against
arbitrary powers which are sometimes exerted
the parent state.
by irresponsible monarchs to the great
detriment of the people and the destruction of
their liberties. On the contrary, it is a most (3) That which is established and
beneficient function, and often necessary to be maintained by military forces who invade
exercised in the interest of humanity, and for and occupy a territory of the enemy in the
the prevention of injury to those who cannot course of war, and which is denominated
protect themselves." as a government of paramount force.
(Cruz, Philippine Political Law, 2014
4. De Jure government, Criteria for edition, p. 40, cited in Co Kim Chan v.
legitimacy Valdez Tan Keh, 75 Phil. 113)
They are acts done by the State, through “struck off” at a “not inaugurated at
its political departments of the definite time and any specific time
government and not subject to judicial place following a but changing by
review. (Cruz, Philippine Political Law, conscious or deli- accretion rather
2014 edition, p. 47) berate effort taken than by any sys-
by a constituent tematic method.”
III. THE PHILIPPINE body or ruler.
CONSTITUTION Rigid Flexible
One that can be One that can be
A. Constitution: definition, nature and amended only by a changed by ordi-
concepts formal and usually nary legislation.
difficult process.
1. Definition
b. Essential Qualities of a Written
A constitution is that body of rules and Constitution
maxims in accordance with which the
powers of sovereignty are habitually (1) Broad
exercised. (Cooley, Constitutional
Limitations, p. 4, as cited in Cruz, It is such not only because it provides for
Constitutional Law, 2015 edition, p. 3) the organization of the entire government
and covers all persons and things within
2. Nature the territory of the State but more so
because it is supposed to embody the past,
The purpose of the Constitution is to to reflect the present and to anticipate the
prescribe the permanent framework of a future.
system of government, to assign to the
several departments their respective (2) Brief
powers and duties, and to establish
certain first fixed principles on which It must confine itself to basic principles to
government is founded. (11 Am. Jur. 606, be implemented with legislative details
as cited in Cruz, Constitutional Law, 2015 more adjustable to change and easier to
edition, p. 3) amend.
Found in Articles II, III, IV, V, and XII of November 1, 1897 – The Republic of Biak
the Constitution. na Bato was established in San Miguel,
Bulacan.
2. Constitution of government
December 14, 1897 – The Pact of Biak na
It consists of a series of provisions Bato was signed between Spain and the
outlining the organization of the Aguinaldo administration.
government, enumerating its powers,
laying down certain rules relative to its January 21, 1899 – The First Philippine
administration, and defining the Republic was founded following the
electorate. promulgation of its Constitution, the first
in Asia.
Found in Articles VI to XI of the
Constitution. February 4, 1899 – The Philippine-
American war started when American
3. Constitution of sovereignty troops shot Filipino soldiers in Santa
Mesa, Manila.
It consists of the provisions pointing out
the mode or procedure in accordance with March 23, 1901 – President Emilio
which formal changes in the fundamental Aguinaldo was captured by the Americans
law may be brought about. under the command of Col. Frederick
Funston at Palanan, Isabela, signifying
Found in Article XVII of the Constitution. the end of the First Philippine Republic.
“All military, civil, and judicial powers and Filipino forces fell under the
necessary to govern the Philippine Islands Japanese.
acquired from Spain by the treaties
concluded at Paris on December 10, 1898 October 14, 1943 – The Second Philippine
and at the Washington on November 7, Republic was established. Jose P. Laurel
1900 shall, unless otherwise provided by served as its President.
Congress, be vested in such manner as
the President of the United States direct, October 20, 1944 – American and
for the establishment of civil government, Philippine Commonwealth forces set sail
and for maintaining and protecting the at Palo, Leyte, marking their return to
inhabitants of the said islands in free liberate the Philippines from Japan.
enjoyment of their liberty, property, and
religion.” August 15, 1945 – Japan surrendered to
the Allied forces.
This amendment formally establishes the
American civil government with William August 17, 1945 – The Second Philippine
Howard Taft as its first civil governor. Republic comes to an end.
January 17, 1973 – The 1973 Constitution Section 1. Any amendment to, or
took effect after the ratification of the revision of, this Constitution may be
same by way of a plebiscite. proposed by:
1978 – Interim Batasang Pambansa was (1) The Congress, upon a vote of three-
established. fourths of all its Members; or
February 22-25, 1986 – EDSA People Section 3. The Congress may, by a vote
Power Revolution. of two-thirds of all its Members, call a
constitutional convention, or by a
g. 1986 (EDSA) Revolution and the majority vote of all its Members,
Freedom Constitution submit to the electorate the question
of calling such a convention.
March 25, 1986 – Freedom Constitution
was drafted in transition of the upcoming Santiago v. Commission on Elections
Constitution. This move repealed the G. R. No. 127325, 19 March 1997
1973 Constitution. 270 SCRA 106
Facts:
h. 1987 Constitution
A certain Atty. Jesus Delfin filed a petition to
amend the 1987 Constitution by way of
February 2, 1987 – The 1987 Constitution people’s initiative with the Commission on
took effect. Elections (Comelec) to lift term limits of
elective officials, seeking to amend Article VI,
D. Amendments and Revisions (Article Sections 4 and 7; Article VII, Section 4; and
XVII, Sections 1, 2 & 3) Article X, Section 8 of the Constitution.
Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago and other
petitioners questioned the move on the
initiative, contending that there was no law
people sign on a petition that contains be allowed to sap its strength nor greed
the full text of the proposed for power debase its rectitude. Right or
amendments. wrong, the Constitution must be upheld
as long as it has not been changed by the
The full text of the proposed amendments may
sovereign people lest its disregard result
be either written on the face of the petition, or
attached to it. If so attached, the petition must
in the usurpation of the majesty of law by
state the fact of such attachment. This is an the pretenders to illegitimate power.
assurance that every one of the several (Cruz, Constitutional Law, 2015 edition,
millions of signatories to the petition had seen p. 4)
the full text of the proposed amendments
before signing. Otherwise, it is physically Manila Prince Hotel v. Government
impossible, given the time constraint, to prove Service Insurance System
that every one of the millions of signatories G. R. No. 122156, 3 February 1997
had seen the full text of the proposed 267 SCRA 408
amendments before signing. The framers of
the Constitution directly borrowed the concept Facts:
of people’s initiative from the United States A bidding for the purchase of Manila Hotel
where various State constitutions incorporate commenced. The leading bidders are Manila
an initiative clause. In almost all States which Prince Hotel and a Malaysian firm Renong
allow initiative petitions, the unbending Berhad, in which the latter being the highest
requirement is that the people must first bidder. Manila Prince Hotel questioned the
see the full text of the proposed constitutionality of the bid of Renong Berhad,
amendments before they sign to signify invoking Article XII, Section 10 of the 1987
their assent, and that the people must Constitution, adding that Manila Hotel has
sign on an initiative petition that been identified with the Filipino nation and
contains the full text of the proposed has practically become a historical monument
amendments. which reflects the vibrancy of Philippine
heritage and culture. It is a proud legacy of an
E. Self-executing and non-executing earlier generation of Filipinos who believed in
provisions the nobility and sacredness of independence
and its power and capacity to release the full
potential of the Filipino people. To all intents
Self-executing Non self-executing
and purposes, it has become a part of the
provisions provisions national patrimony.
Those which can be Those which
implemented require certain Issue:
without need of a legislations from Whether or not the bid is constitutional.
legislation from Congress.
Congress Held:
No.
F. Supremacy of the Constitution A constitution is a system of fundamental
laws for the governance and administration of
a nation. It is supreme, imperious, absolute
The Constitution is the basic and and unalterable except by the authority from
paramount law to which all other laws which it emanates. It has been defined as the
must conform and to which all persons, fundamental and paramount law of the
including the highest officials of the land, nation.It prescribes the permanent framework
must defer. No act shall be valid, however of a system of government, assigns to the
noble its intentions, if it conflicts with the different departments their respective powers
Constitution. The Constitution must ever and duties, and establishes certain fixed
remain supreme. All must bow to the principles on which government is founded.
mandate of this law. Expediency must not The fundamental conception in other words is
that it is a supreme law to which all otherlaws Adhering to the doctrine of constitutional
must conform and in accordance with which supremacy, the subject constitutional
all private rights must be determined and all provision is, as it should be, impliedly written
public authority administered. Under the in the bidding rules issued by respondent
doctrine of constitutional supremacy, if a law GSIS, lest the bidding rules be nullified for
or contract violates any norm of the being violative of the Constitution. It is a basic
constitution that law or contract whether principle in constitutional law that all laws
promulgated by the legislative or by the and contracts must conform with the
executive branch or entered into by private fundamental law of the land. Those which
persons for private purposes is null and void violate the Constitution lose their reason for
and without any force and effect. Thus, since being.
the Constitution is the fundamental,
paramountand supreme law of the nation, it is In the instant case, where a foreign firm
deemed written in everystatute and contract. submits the highest bid in a public bidding
concerning the grant of rights, privileges and
When the Constitution addresses the State it concessions covering the national economy
refers not only to the people but also to the and patrimony, thereby exceeding the bid of a
government as elements of the State. After all, Filipino, there is no question that the Filipino
government is composed of three (3) divisions will have to be allowed to match the bid of the
of power—legislative, executive and judicial. foreign entity. And if the Filipino matches the
Accordingly, a constitutional mandate bid of a foreign firm the award should go to
directed to the State is correspondingly the Filipino. lt must be so if we are to give life
directed to the three (3) branches of and meaning to the Filipino First Policy
government. It is undeniable that in this case provision of the 1987 Constitution. For, while
the subject constitutional injunction is this may neither be expressly stated nor
addressed among others to the Executive contemplated in the bidding rules, the
Department and respondent GSIS, a constitutional fiat is omnipresent to be simply
government instrumentality deriving its disregarded. To ignore it would be to sanction
authority from the State. a perilous skirting of the basic law.
Section 3. The State may not be sued Section 50. Appeal from decisions of the
without its consent. Commission. The party aggrieved by
any decision, order or ruling of the
2. When is a suit against the State? Commission may within thirty days from
his receipt of a copy thereof appeal on
Indiscriminate suits against the State will certiorari to the Supreme Court in the
result in the impairment of its dignity, manner provided by law and the Rules of
besides being a challenge to its supposed Court. When the decision, order, or ruling
infallibility. To Justice Holmes, however, adversely affects the interest of any
the doctrine of non-suability is based not government agency, the appeal may be
on “any formal conception or obsolete taken by the proper head of that
theory but on the logical and practical agency.
ground that there can be no legal right
against the authority which makes the University of the Philippines v. Dizon
law on which the right depends. (Cruz, G. R. No. 171182, 23 August 2012
Philippine Political Law, 2014 edition, p. 679 SCRA 54
48)
Facts:
The University of the Philippines (UP)
3. Express consent entered into a general construction agreement
with Stern Builders Corporation for the
a. Money claims arising from contract construction of the extension building and the
renovation of the College of Arts and Sciences
- Act 3083 Building in UP Los Baños. During the
implement-tation of the agreement, Stern
Section 1. Subject to the provisions of this Builders submitted 3 billings, in which UP
Act, the Government of the Philippine only submitted 2 of them. Stern Builders
Islands(now Republic of the Philippines) demanded UP to pay the third billing but the
latter failed to do so. Stern Builders filed an
hereby consents and submits to be
action against UP, in which the trial court
sued upon any moneyed claim ruled in favor of the former, ordering the
involving liability arising from garnishment of public funds belonging to UP
contract, express or implied, which could as payment to Stern Builders, which was
serve as a basis of civil action between affirmed by the CA.
private parties.
Issue:
- CA 327, as amended by PD 1445 Whether or not the funds belonging to UP can
be garnished.
Section 49. Period for rendering decisions
Held:
of the Commission. The Commission shall
No.
decide any case brought before it Irrefragably, the UP is a government
within sixty days from the date of its instrumentality, performing the State’s
submission for resolution. If the constitutional mandate of promoting quality
in which the latter are employed or on the simple rule is that it is suable if its
occasion of their functions. charter says so, and this is true regardless
of the functions it is performing. (Cruz,
Employers shall be liable for the damages Philippine Political Law, 2014 edition, pp.
caused by their employees and household 70-71)
helpers acting within the scope of their
assigned tasks, even though the former 4. Implied Consent
are not engaged in any business or
industry. a. Government submits itself to court’s
jurisdiction
The State is responsible in like manner
when it acts through a special agent; The State itself files a complaint.
but not when the damage has been
caused by the official to whom the Republic v. Sandiganbayan
task done properly pertains, in which G. R. No. 85284, 28 February 1990
case what is provided in Article 2176 shall 182 SCRA 911
be applicable.
Facts:
During the pendency of the case filed by the
Lastly, teachers or heads of establish- Republic of the Philippines through the
ments of arts and trades shall be liable for Presidential Commission on Good Governance
damages caused by their pupils and (PCGG) against former President Ferdinand
students or apprentices, so long as they Marcos for reconveyance, reversion,
remain in their custody. accounting, restitution and damages,
Simplicio Palanca, one of the stockholders of
The responsibility treated of in this article Bacolod Real Estate Development Corporation
shall cease when the persons herein (BREDCO), moved to intervene with the
mentioned prove that they observed all proceedings because they have interest in the
lots owned by BREDCO and the shares of
the diligence of a good father of a family
stocks owned by BREDCO. Sandiganbayan
to prevent damage. (1903a) granted the intervention.
words, a third person who makes himself a limitations provided in this Code and
party to an existing litigation, may either join other laws.
the plaintiff in claiming what is sought in the
complaint, by filing a complaint in (b) Local government units may continue
intervention, or by uniting with the defendant
using, modify, or change their existing
in resisting the claims of the plaintiff, by filing
an answer in intervention.
corporate seals: Provided, That newly
established local government units or
In the present case, the private respondents those without corporate seals may create
intervened in Civil Case No. 0025 merely to their own corporate seals which shall be
unite with the defendants therein in resisting registered with the Department of the
the claims of petitioner, as plaintiff, and for Interior and Local Government: Provided,
that reason asked for no affirmative relief further, That any change of corporate seal
against any party in their answer in shall also be registered as provided
intervention. In other words, this is not a case hereon.
where the private respondents take the
initiative in an action against petitioner by
filing a complaint in intervention or a
(c) Unless otherwise provided in this
complaint. Code, no contract may be entered into by
the local chief executive in behalf of the
b. Government entering into business local government unit without prior
contracts authorization by the sanggunian
concerned. A legible copy of such contract
c. When inequitable for government to shall be posted at a conspicuous place in
claim immunity the provincial capitol or the city,
municipal or barangay hall.
5. Suits against municipal corporations
(d) Local government units shall enjoy full
- RA 7160, Sections 22 & 24 autonomy in the exercise of their
proprietary functions and in the
Section 22. Corporate Powers. - limitations provided in this Code and
other applicable laws,
(a) Every local government unit, as a
corporation, shall have the following Section 24. Liability for Damages. - Local
powers: government units and their officials
are not exempt from liability for death
(1) To have continuous succession in its or injury to persons or damage to
corporate name; property.
buy-bust operation were conducted by the said Diplomatic missions are requested to provide
authorities, coming from the police narcotic the most accurate and descriptive job title to
agents. Minucher also filed a case against that which currently applies to the duties
Arthur Scalzo, an American citizen working performed. The Office of the Protocol would
for the government of the United States, for then assign each individual to the appropriate
damages. Scalzo objected to the filing, being functional category.
not a resident of the Philippines and the being
in personam, it was beyond the processes of But while the diplomatic immunity of Scalzo
the court. The trial court ruled in favor of might thus remain contentious, it was
Minucher, but later reversed by the CA, ruling sufficiently established that, indeed, he
that Scalzo has a diplomatic immunity. worked for the United States Drug
Enforcement Agency and was tasked to
Issue: conduct surveillance of suspected drug
Whether or not Scalzo is diplomatically activities within the country on the dates
immune, thus cannot be sued. pertinent to this case. If it should be
ascertained that Arthur Scalzo was acting
Held: well within his assigned functions when he
Yes. committed the acts alleged in the complaint,
Concededly, vesting a person with diplomatic the present controversy could then be resolved
immunity is a prerogative of the executive under the related doctrine of State Immunity
branch of the government. In World Health from Suit.
Organization vs. Aquino the Court has
recognized that, in such matters, the hands of The precept that a State cannot be sued in the
the courts are virtually tied. Amidst courts of a foreign state is a long-standing rule
apprehensions of indiscriminate and of customaryinternational law then closely
incautious grant of immunity, designed to identified with the personalimmunity of a
gain exemption from the jurisdiction of courts, foreign sovereignfrom suit and, with the
it should behoove the Philippine government, emergence of democratic states,made to attach
specifically its Department of Foreign Affairs, not just to the person of the head of state, or
to be most circumspect, that should his representative, but also distinctly to the
particularly be no less than compelling, in its state itself in its sovereign capacity. If the acts
post litem motam issuances. It might be giving rise to a suit are those of a foreign
recalled that the privilege is not an immunity government done by its foreign agent,
from the observance of the law of the although not necessarily a diplomatic
territorial sovereign or from ensuing legal personage, but acting in his official capacity,
liability; it is, rather, an immunity from the the complaint could be barred by the
exercise of territorial jurisdiction. The immunity of the foreign sovereign from suit
government of the United States itself, which without its consent. Suing a representative of
Scalzo claims to be acting for, has formulated a state is believed to be, in effect, suing the
its standards for recognition of a diplomatic state itself. The proscription is not accorded
agent. The State Department policy is to only for the benefit of an individual but for the
concede diplomatic status to a person who State, in whose service he is, under the
possesses an acknowledged diplomatic title maxim—par in parem, non habet imperium—
and “performs duties of diplomatic nature.” that all states are sovereign equals and cannot
Supplementary criteria for accreditation are assert jurisdiction over one another. The
the possession of a valid diplomatic passport implication, in broad terms, is that if the
or, from States which do not issue such judgment against an official would require the
passports, a diplomatic note formally state itself to perform an affirmative act to
representing the intention to assign the satisfy the award, such as the appropriation of
person to diplomatic duties, the holding of a the amount needed to pay the damages
non-immigrant visa, being over twenty-one decreed against him, the suit must be
years of age, and performing diplomatic regarded as being against the state itself,
functions on an essentially full-time basis. although it has not been formally impleaded.
against the authority that makes the law on to the laws of the Philippines and by a
which the right depends. In the case of foreign specified court of the Philippines is not
States, the rule is derived from the principle necessarily a waiver of sovereign immunity
of the sovereign equality of States, as from suit. The aforesaid provision contains
expressed in the maxim par in parem non language not necessarily inconsistent with
habet imperium. All states are sovereign sovereign immunity. On the other hand, such
equals and cannot assert jurisdiction over one provision may also be meant to apply where
another. A contrary attitude would “unduly the sovereign party elects to sue in the local
vex the peace of nations.” courts, or otherwise waives its immunity by
any subsequent act. The applicability of
The rules of International Law, however, are Philippine laws must be deemed to include
neither unyielding nor impervious to change. Philippine laws in its totality, including the
The increasing need of sovereign States to principle recognizing sovereign immunity.
enter into purely commercial activities Hence, the proper court may have no proper
remotely connected with the discharge of their action, by way of settling the case, except to
governmental functions brought about a new dismiss it.
concept of sovereign immunity. This concept,
the restrictive theory, holds that the Submission by a foreign state to local
immunity of the sovereign is recognized only jurisdiction must be clear and unequivocal. It
with regard to public acts or acts jure imperii, must be given explicitly or by necessary
but not with regard to private acts or acts jure implication. We find no such waiver in this
gestionis. case.
In United States v. Ruiz, for instance, we held Respondent concedes that the establishment
that the conduct of public bidding for the of a diplomatic mission is a sovereign function.
repair of a wharf at a United States Naval On the other hand, he argues that the actual
Station is an act jure imperii. On the other physical maintenance of the premises of the
hand, we considered as an act jure gestionis diplomatic mission, such as the upkeep of its
the hiring of a cook in the recreation center furnishings and equipment, is no longer a
catering to American servicemen and the sovereign function of the State.
general public at the John Hay Air Station in
Baguio City, as well as the bidding for the We disagree. There is no dispute that the
operation of barber shops in Clark Air Base in establishment of a diplomatic mission is an
Angeles City. act jure imperii. A sovereign State does not
merely establish a diplomatic mission and
Apropos the present case, the mere entering leave it at that; the establishment of a
into a contract by a foreign State with a diplomatic mission encompasses its
private party cannot be construed as the maintenance and upkeep. Hence, the State
ultimate test of whether or not it is an act jure may enter into contracts with private entities
imperii or jure gestionis. Such act is only the to maintain the premises, furnishings and
start of the inquiry. Is the foreign State equipment of the embassy and the living
engaged in the regular conduct of a business? quarters of its agents and officials. It is
If the foreign State is not engaged regularly in therefore clear that petitioner Republic of
a business or commercial activity, and in this Indonesia was acting in pursuit of a sovereign
case it has not been shown to be so engaged, activity when it entered into a contract with
the particular act or transaction must then be respondent for the upkeep or maintenance of
tested by its nature. If the act is in pursuit of the air conditioning units, generator sets,
a sovereign activity, or an incident thereof, electrical facilities, water heaters, and water
then it is an act jure imperii. motor pumps of the Indonesian Embassy and
the official residence of the Indonesian
Hence, the existence alone of a paragraph in a ambassador.
contract stating that any legal action arising
out of the agreement shall be settled according 7. Suits Against International Agencies
(e) Be accorded the same privileges in It is based upon the ethical principle that
respect of exchange facilities as are such delegated power constitutes not only
accorded to the officials of comparable a right but a duty to be performed by the
ranks forming part of diplomatic missions delegate through the instrumentality of
to the Government concerned; his own judgment and not through the
intervening mind of another. (Cruz,
(f) Be given, together with their spouses Philippine Political Law, 2014 edition, p.
and relatives dependent on them, the, 160, citing various Supreme Court
same repatriation facilities in time of decisions)
international crisis as diplomatic envoys;
2. Exceptions
(g) Have the right to import free of duty
their furniture and effects at the time of a. By direct constitutional grant
first taking up their post in the' country in
question. - Tariff powers to the President (Article
VI, Section 28 [2])
8. Suits against public officers; exceptions
Section 28. (1) xxx
The test is whether, assuming the
decision is rendered against the public (2) The Congress may, by law,
officer impleaded, enforcement thereof authorize the President to fix within
will require an affirmative act from the specified limits, and subject to such
State, such as the appropriation of the limitations and restrictions as it may
needed amount to satisfy the judgment. If
impose, tariff rates, import and export privileged. Such rules shall provide a
quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues, simplified and inexpensive procedure for
and other duties or imposts within the the speedy disposition of cases, shall be
framework of the national development uniform for all courts of the same grade,
program of the Government. and shall not diminish, increase, or
modify substantive rights. Rules of
- Emergency powers to the President procedure of special courts and quasi-
(Article VI, Section 23 [2]) judicial bodies shall remain effective
unless disapproved by the Supreme
Section 23. (1) xxx Court.
Section 5. The Supreme Court shall have Section 3. The Commission on Elections
the following powers: may sit en banc or in two divisions, and
shall promulgate its rules of
(1) xxx procedure in order to expedite
disposition of election cases, including
(5) Promulgate rules concerning the pre- proclamation controversies. All such
protection and enforcement of election cases shall be heard and decided
constitutional rights, pleading, practice, in division, provided that motions for
and procedure in all courts, the admission reconsideration of decisions shall be
to the practice of law, the integrated bar, decided by the Commission en banc.
and legal assistance to the under-
“An officer to whom a discretion is entrusted province, based on the decision of the
cannot delegate it to another, the presumption Commission on Elections (Comelec). Comelec
being that he was chosen because he was later on declared a status quo on the newly
deemed fit and competent to exercise that formed province as part of the province of
judgment and discretion, and unless the Maguindanao’s first legislative district. Bai
power to substitute another in his place has Sandra Sema, who ran as representative of
been given to him, he cannot delegate his Shariff Kabunsuan in the 2007 elections
duties to another. In those cases in which the questioned the ruling of Comelec, excluding
proper execution of the office requires, on the the votes canvassed from Cotabato City,
part of the officer, the exercise of judgment or contending that Shariff Kabunsuan is entitled
discretion, the presumption is that he was to one representative in Congress and the
chosen because he was deemed fit and Comelec usurped the power of Congress to
competent to exercise that judgment and create or reapportion legislative districts.
discretion, and, unless power to substitute Representative Didagen Dilangalen contended
another in his place has been given to him, he that the resolution of Comelec is
cannot delegate his duties to another.” constitutional because there was no
reapportionment of a legislative district but
Respondents’ assertion to the contrary is not only renaming the same.
tenable. The ruling in the case cited by
respondents to support their contention is not Issue:
applicable in the case at bar. While it is true Whether or not there is undue delegation of
that the Court has determined in the case of power in the case of creating a province from
American Tobacco Company v. Director of the regional assembly of ARMM.
Patents that a delegate may exercise his
authority through persons he appoints Held:
toassist him in his functions, it must be Yes.
stressed that the Court explicitly stated in the There is no provision in the Constitution that
same case that said practice is permissible conflicts with the delegation to regional
only when the judgment and discretion finally legislative bodies of the power to create
exercised are those of the officer authorized by municipalities and barangays, provided
law. According to the Court, the rule that Section 10, Article X of the Constitution is
requires an administrative officer to exercise followed. However, the creation of provinces
his own judgment and discretion does not and cities is another matter. Section 5 (3),
preclude him from utilizing, as a matter of Article VI of the Constitution provides, “Each
practical administrative procedure, the aid of city with a population of at least two hundred
subordinates, so long as it is the legally fifty thousand, or each province, shall have at
authorized official who makes the final least one representative” in the House of
decision through the use of his own personal Representatives. Similarly, Section 3 of the
judgment. Ordinance appended to the Constitution
provides, “Any province that may hereafter be
- Delegation to local government units created, or any city whose population may
(ordinances as subordinate legislation) hereafter increase to more than two hundred
fifty thousand shall be entitled in the
Sema v. Commission on Elections immediately following election to at least one
G. R. No. 177597, 16 July 2008 Member x x x.”
558 SCRA 700
Clearly, a province cannot be created without
Facts: a legislative district because it will violate
The Province of Shariff Kabunsuan was Section 5 (3), Article VI of the Constitution as
formed from the province of Maguindanao well as Section 3 of the Ordinance appended
through law, ratified by a plebiscite of the to the Constitution. For the same reason, a
voters of Maguindanao, which included city with a population of 250,000 or more
Cotabato City as part of the newly formed cannot also be created without a legislative
district. Thus, the power to create a province, national law. Only Congress can enact such a
or a city with a population of 250,000 or more, law. It would be anomalous for regional or
requires also the power to create a legislative local legislative bodies to create or reapportion
district. Even the creation of a city with a legislative districts for a national legislature
population of less than 250,000 involves the like Congress. An inferior legislative body,
power to create a legislative district because created by a superior legislative body, cannot
once the city’s population reaches 250,000, the change the membership of the superior
city automatically becomes entitled to one legislative body.
representative under Section 5 (3), Article VI
of the Constitution and Section 3 of the The creation of the ARMM, and the grant of
Ordinance appended to the Constitution. legislative powers to its Regional Assembly
Thus, the power to create a province or city under its organic act, did not divest Congress
inherently involves the power to create a of its exclusive authority to create legislative
legislative district. districts. This is clear from the Constitution
and the ARMM Organic Act, as amended.
For Congress to delegate validly the power to Thus, Section 20, Article X of the Constitution
create a province or city, it must also validly provides:
delegate at the same time the power to create
a legislative district. The threshold issue then “SECTION 20. Within its territorial
is, can Congress validly delegate to the ARMM jurisdiction and subject to the provisions of
Regional Assembly the power to create this Constitution and national laws, the
legislative districts for the House of organic act of autonomous regions shall
Representatives? The answer is in the provide for legislative powers over:
negative.
(1) Administrative organization;
Section 5 (1), Article VI of the Constitution
vests in Congress the power to increase, (2) Creation of sources of revenues;
through a law, the allowable membership in
the House of Representatives. Section 5 (4) (3) Ancestral domain and natural resources;
empowers Congress to reapportion legislative
districts. The power to reapportion legislative (4) Personal, family, and property relations;
districts necessarily includes the power to
create legislative districts out of existing ones. (5) Regional urban and rural planning
Congress exercises these powers through a development;
law that Congress itself enacts, and not
through a law that regional or local legislative (6) Economic, social, and tourism
bodies enact. The allowable membership of the development;
House of Representatives can be increased,
and new legislative districts of Congress can (7) Educational policies;
be created, only through a national law passed
by Congress. In Montejo v. COMELEC, we (8) Preservation and development of the
held that the “power of redistricting x x x is cultural heritage; and
traditionally regarded as part of the power (of
Congress) to make laws,” and thus is vested (9) Such other matters as may be authorized
exclusively in Congress. by law for the promotion of the general
welfare of the people of the region.
This textual commitment to Congress of the
exclusive power to create or reapportion Nothing in Section 20, Article X of the
legislative districts is logical. Congress is a Constitution authorizes autonomous regions,
national legislature and any increase in its expressly or impliedly, to create or
allowable membership or in its incumbent reapportion legislative districts for Congress.
membership through the creation of
legislative districts must be embodied in a
provision of the Administrative Code which October 10, 1905; and September 7, 1911; also
makes it the duty of the municipal council, Berriz, Diccionario de la Administración, p.
conformably with law, "to prohibit and 35.)
penalize * * * gambling." (Sec. 2188 [j], Adm.
Code of 1916; sec. 2242 [?], Adm. Code of If, therefore, we were to restrict our
1917.) This is a more restricted power than investigation to those portions of the
that found in the original Municipal Code Administrative Code which authorize a
which authorized a municipal council to municipal council to prohibit and penalize
"provide against the evils of gambling, gambling, there would exist grave doubt, to
gambling houses, and disorderly houses of say the least, of the validity of ordinance No. 3
whatsoever sort." (Act No. 82, sec.v39 [u].) The of the municipality of Orion, Bataan. There
present municipal law, since making use of remains for consideration a different approach
the word "gambling," must be construed with to the question. While Philippine law gives to
reference to the Insular Law, Act No. 1757, gambling a restricted meaning, it is to be
relating to the same subject. Act No. 1757 in noted that, in its broader signification,
section 1 defines "gambling" as "the playing of gambling relates to play by certain rules at
any game for money or any representative of cards, dice, or other contrivance, so that one
value or valuable consideration or thing, the shall be the loser and the other the winner.
result of which game depends wholly or chiefly (20 Cyc., 878; Bouvier's Law Dictionary;
upon chance or hazard, or the useof any People vs. Todd [1889], 51 Hun [N. Y.], 446,
mechanical inventions or contrivance to 451; 4 N. Y. Supp., 25.) As one example, the
determine by chance the loser or winner of Charter of the town of Ruston, State of
money or of any representative of value or of Louisiana, authorized it "to restrain, prohibit,
any valuable consideration or thing." In the and suppress * * * games and gambling
United States vs. Hilario ([1913], 24 Phil., houses and rooms * * *, and to provide for the
392), the Supreme Court went into the subject punishment of the persons engaged in the
of the meaning of "gambling" in this same." Under this power the town passed an
jurisdiction, and found that it includes those ordinance prohibiting "all games of chance,
games the result of which depend wholly or lottery, banking games, raffling, and all other
chiefly upon chance or hazard, and excludes species of gambling," indicating that there
those games the result of which depend wholly were other species of gambling in addition to
or chiefly upon skill, with the result that games of chance. (See Town ofRuston vs.
sections 621 to 625 of the Revised Ordinances Perkins [1905], 114 La., 851.) The common
of the city of Manila (734-738 of the Revised law notion for gambling. which only made it
Ordinances of 1917) were found to prohibit an indictable offense when the play was
only games of chance or hazard. attended by such circumstances as would in
themselves amount to a riot or a nuisance or
The ordinance of Orion, Bataan, merely to an actual breach of the peace, has given
prohibits the playing of panguingue on certain way to statutes and ordinances designed to
days, without describing it. Further, although restrain, suppress, or control gambling.
this court has considered the method by which
many other games are played, it has never as Authority for the State or a municipality to
yet authoritatively decided whether take action to control gambling in this larger
panguingue was a game of skill or hazard. Nor sense can be found in an analysis of what is
was any evidence on this point introduced in called the police power. Any attempt to define
the present case. However, a reading of the the police power with circumstantial precision
decision of the trial court and of official would savor of pedantry. The United States
opinions of two Attorneys-General, of which Supreme Court tritely describes it as "the
we can take judicial cognizance, warrants the most essential of all powers, at times the most
deduction that panguingue is not a game of insistent, and always one of least limitable of
chance or hazard and is not prohibited by Act the powers of government." (District of
No. 1757. (See Opinions of the Attorney- Columbia vs. Brooks [1909], 214 U. S., 138.)
General of July 11, 1904; July 25, 1904; The police power is based on the maxim "salus
populi est suprema lex"—the welfare of the preamble of the ordinance of Orion assigns as
people is the first law. The United States authority for its enactment. Said section 2184
Supreme Court has said that it extends "to the of the Administrative Code of 1916 (sec. 2238,
protection of the lives, health and property of Adm, Code of 1917) reads:
the citizens, and to the preservation of good
order and the public morals." (Beer Co. vs. "The municipal council shall enact such
Massachusetts [1878], 97 U. S., 25; Barbier vs. ordinances and make such regulations, not
Connolly [1885], 113 U. S., 27.) The Supreme repugnant to law, as may be necessary to
Court of these Islands has said that "the police carry into effect and discharge the powers and
power of the state includes not only the public duties conferred upon it by law and such as
health and safety, but also the public welfare, shall seem necessary and proper to provide for
protection against impositions, and generally the health and safety, promote the prosperity,
the public's best interest." (U. S. vs. Pompeya improve the morals, peace, good order,
[1915], 31 Phil., 245.) Recent judicial decisions comfort, and convenience of themunicipality
incline to give a more extensive scope to the and the inhabitants thereof, and for the
police power than the older cases. The public protection of property therein."
welfare is rightfully made the basis of
construction. This section, known as the general welfare
clause, delegates in statutory form the police
Not only does the State effectuate its purposes power to a municipality. As above stated, this
through the exercise of the police power but clause has been given wide application by
the municipality does also. Like the State, the municipal authorities and has in its relation
police power of a municipal corporation to the particular circumstances of the case
extends to all matters affecting the peace, been liberally construed by the courts. Such, it
order, health, morals, convenience, comfort, is well to recall, is the progressive view of
and safety of its citizens—the security of Philippine jurisprudence.
social order—the best and highest interests of
the municipality. (Case vs. Board of Health of The general welfare clause has two branches.
Manila and Heiser [1913], 24 Phil., 250.) The One branch attaches itself to the main trunk
best considered decisions have tended to of municipal authority, and relates to such
broaden the scope of action of the municipality ordinances and regulations as may be
in dealing with police offenses. Within the necessary to carry into effect and discharge
general police powers of a municipal the powers and duties conferred upon the
corporation is the suppression of gambling. municipal council by law. With this class we
Ordinances aimed in a reasonable way at the are not here directly concerned. The second
accomplishment of this purpose are branch of the clause is much more
undoubtedly valid. (See U. S. vs. Pacis [1915], independent of the specific functions of the
31 Phil., 524; 39 L. R. A., 523, Note; Cooley's council which are enumerated by law. It
Constitutional Limitations, 6th edition, pp. authorizes such ordinances "as shall seem
138, 226, 742; Greenville vs. Kemmis [1900], necessary and proper to provide for the health
58 S. C., 427 [holding that under the general and safety, promote the prosperity, improve
welfare clause a city may pass an ordinance the morals, peace, good order, comfort, and
prohibiting gambling in any private house].) convenience of the municipality and the
inhabitants thereof, and for the protection of
The Philippine Legislature, as before property therein."
intimated, delegated to municipalities certain
legislative powers of a discretionary nature. It is a general rule that ordinances passed by
Many of these powers are named specifically. virtue of the implied power found in the
But in addition, and preceding both the general welfare clause must be reasonable,
specific powers of a mandatory and consonant with the general powers and
discretionary character, is the general power purposes of the corporation, and not
of a municipal council to enact ordinances and inconsistent with the laws or policy of the
make regulations. It is this grant that the State. The ordinance of the municipality of
Orion does not seem in itself to be pernicious, Phil., 1.) President McKinley's Instructions to
or unreasonable or discriminatory. Its the Commission still remain undisturbed by
purposes evidently are to improve the morals subsequent Acts of Congress dealing with
and stimulate the industry of the people. A Philippine affairs and yet constitute a portion
person is to be compelled to refrain from of our constitutional law, as to the inviolable
private acts injurious both to himself and his rule that "municipal governments * * * shall
neighbors. These objects, to be attained by be afforded the opportunity to manage their
limiting the pastime to definite days, do not own affairs to the fullest extent of which they
infringe any law of the general government. are capable." Again the same organic law
says, "In the distribution of powers among the
The constitutional provision that no person governments organized by the Commission,
shall be deprived of liberty without due the presumption is always to be in favor of the
process of law is not violated by this smaller subdivision, so that all the powers
ordinance. Liberty of action by the individual which can properly be exercised by the
is not unduly circumscribed; that is, it is not municipal government shall be vested in that
unduly circumscribed if we have in mind the government * * * ." Let us never forget these
correct notion of this "the greatest of all principles so highly protective of local self-
rights." That gravest of sociological government.The judiciary can very well take
questions—How far, consistently with notice of the fact that municipalities are
freedom, may the liberties of the individual accustomed to enacting ordinances aimed at
member of society be subordinated to the will the regulation of gambling. The executive
of the Government?—has been debated for authorities and the Attorney-General have
centuries, in vain, if we can not now discount usually upheld the validityof such ordinances,
the time worn objection to any and all especially those intended to restrict the
interference with private rights in order to playing of panguingue. (Opinions of the
effectuate the public purpose. (See United Attorney- General, supra; Opinion of the
States vs. Salaveria. Jacobson vs. Executive Secretary, July 6, 1909;
Massachusetts [1905], 197 U. S., 11; State vs. Indorsement of the Governor-General, July
Kreutzberg [1902], 58 L. R. A., 748.) Almost 21, 1904.)
countless are the governmental restrictions on
the citizen. The presumption is all in favor of This general municipal practice, indicative of
validity. The inhabitants of a municipality are a social cancer to be eradicated, should not be
in themselves miniature states. The action of discouraged by strict judicial construction.
the elected representatives of the people More important still, the courts cannot but
cannot be lightly set aside. The councilors realize that gambling, in its larger sense as
must, in the very nature of things, be familiar well as in its restricted sense, is an act beyond
with the necessities of their particular the pale of good morals, which, for the welfare
municipality and with all the facts and of the Filipino people, should be exterminated.
circumstances which surround the subject,
and necessitate action. The local legislative The suppression of the evil does not interfere
body, by enacting the ordinance, has in effect with any of the inherent rights of citizenship.
given notice that the regulations are essential The pernicious practice is rightfully regarded
to the well being of the people. Who is in as the offspring of idleness and the prolific
abetter position to say whether the playing of parent of vice and immorality, demoralizing in
panguingue is deleterious to social order and its association and tendencies, detrimental to
the public interest in a certain municipality— the best interests of society, and encouraging
the municipal council, or the courts? wastefulness, thriftlessness, and a belief that
a livelihood may be earned by other means
The answer is self-evident. The Judiciary than honest industry. To be condemned in
should not lightly set aside legislative action itself, it has the further effect of causing
when there is not a clear invasion of personal poverty, dishonesty, fraud, and deceit. Many a
or property rights under the guise of police man has neglected his business and
regulation. (See U. S. vs. Joson [1913], 26 mortgaged his integrity to follow the fickle
Goddess of the cards. Many a woman has Bayani Fernando insisted on the enforcement
wasted her hours and squandered her of the order. St. Scholastica questioned the
substance at the gambling board while home validity and constitutionality of the order of
and children were forgotten. It is highly demolition and replacement of fences,
proper that this pastime should be subject to contending thatwould be tantamount to an
the control of restraints imposed by the appropriation of property without due process
ordinances of local governments peculiarly of law; and that the petitioners could only
afflicted by the evil. (See In re Voss [1903], 11 appropriate a portion of their property
N. D., 540; Ex parte Tuttle [1891], 91 Cal., through eminent domain. They also pointed
589; Greenwood vs. State [1873], 6 Baxt., 567; out that the goal of the provisions to deter
32 Am. Rep., 539; 12 R. C. L., 709-715.) lawless elements and criminality did not exist
as the solid concrete walls of the school had
For the suppression of such an evil, coordinate served as sufficient protection for many
and harmonious action must concur between years.. The City Government of Marikina
the three departments of Government. A law countered that the ordinance was a valid
or ordinance enacted by the legislative body exercise of police power, by virtue of which,
must exist. Such an ordinance is before us. they could restrain property rights for the
Vigorous executive enforcement must take protection of public safety, health, morals, or
place to make the law or ordinance a reality. the promotion of public convenience and
Such activity by the police has brought this general prosperity. The RTC ruled in favor of
case to the courts. And finally the Judiciary, St. Scholastica, which was affirmed by the CA.
having full respect for the legislative action of
the municipal council and for the prosecution Issue:
by the executive officials, must, by judicial Whether or not the ordinance regulating the
construction, equally as progressive and construction of fences and walls is a valid
constructive, give effect to the action of the exercise of police power.
other two powers. Wherefore, although
panguingue is not named in the general law Held:
on gambling, and although not entirely a No.
game of chance, since it is a proper subject for “Police power is the plenary power vested in
regulation by municipal authorities acting the legislature to make statutes and
under their delegated police power, whose ordinances to promote the health, morals,
laudable intention is to improve the public peace, education, good order or safety and
morals and promote the prosperity of their general welfare of the people.” The State,
people, their action should be upheld by the through the legislature, has delegated the
courts. Ordinance No. 3 of Orion, Bataan, is exercise of police power to local government
found to be valid. units, as agencies of the State. This delegation
of police power is embodied in Section 16 of
Fernando v. St. Scholastica’s College the Local Government Code of 1991 (R.A. No.
G. R. No. 161107, 12 March 2013 7160), known as the General Welfare Clause,
693 SCRA 141 which has two branches. “The first, known as
the general legislative power, authorizes the
Facts: municipal council to enact ordinances and
The Sangguniang Panglungsod of Marikina make regulations not repugnant to law, as
City enacted an ordinance regulating the may be necessary to carry into effect and
construction of fence and walls. Later, the discharge the powers and duties conferred
City Government ordered the demolition and upon the municipal council by law. The
replacement of the fences of the property second, known as the police power proper,
owned by St. Scholastica’s College to make it authorizes the municipality to enact
80% see-thru, and, at the same time, to move ordinances as may be necessary and proper for
it back about 6 meters to provide parking the health and safety, prosperity, morals,
space for vehicles to park. St. Scholastica peace, good order, comfort, and convenience of
requested for extension but then Mayor
the municipality and its inhabitants, and for Lacking a concurrence of these two requisites,
the protection of their property.” the police power measure shall be struck down
as an arbitrary intrusion into private rights
Ordinance No. 192 was passed by the City and a violation of the due process clause.
Council of Marikina in the apparent exercise
of its police power. To successfully invoke the - Eminent Domain: Genuine Necessity of
exercise of police power as the rationale for Taking
the enactment of an ordinance and to free it
from the imputation of constitutional
- Taxation: Expressly granted by law
infirmity, two tests have been used by the
Court―the rational relationship test and the
strict scrutiny test: 3. Tests for due delegation of power
legislative bills for the creation of the in which the official concerned resides, for his
municipalities involved in this case had failed officewould thereby become vacant. Thus, by
to pass Congress. A better proof of the fact merely brandishing the power to create a new
that the issuance of said executive orders municipality (if he had it), without actually
entails the exercise of purely legislative creating it, he could compel local officials to
functions can hardly be given. submit to his dictation, thereby, in effect,
exercising over them the power of control
Again, Section 10(1) of Article VII of our denied to him by the Constitution.
fundamental law ordains:
Then, also, the power of control of the
"The President shall have control of all the President over executive departments,
executive departments, bureaus, or offices, bureaus or offices implies no more than the
exercise general supervision over all local authority to assume directly the functions
governments as may be provided by law, and thereof or to interfere in the exercise of
take care that the laws be faithfully executed." discretion by its officials. Manifestly, such
control does not include the authority either to
The power of control under this provision abolish an executive department or bureau, or
implies the right of the President to interfere to create a new one. As a consequence, the
in the exercise of such discretion as may be alleged power of the President to create
vested by law in the officers of the executive municipal corporations would necessarily
departments, bureaus, or offices of the connote the exercise by him of an authority
national government, as well as to act in lieu even greater than that of control which he has
of such officers. This power is, denied by the over the executive departments, bureaus or
Constitution to the Executive, insofar as local offices. In other words, Section 68 of the
governments are concerned. With respect Revised Administrative Code does not merely
tothe latter, the fundamental law permits him fail to comply with the constitutional mandate
to wield no more authority than that of above quoted. Instead of giving the President
checking whether said local governments or less power over local governments than that
the officers thereof perform their duties as vested in him over the executive departments,
provided by statutory enactments. Hence, the bureaus or offices, it reverses the process and
President cannot interfere with local does the exact opposite, by conferring upon
governments, so long as the same or its him more power over municipal corporations
officers act within the scope of their authority. than that which he has over said executive
He may not enact an ordinance which the departments, bureaus or offices.
municipal council has failed or refused to
pass, even if it had thereby violated a duty In short, even if it did entail an undue
imposed thereto by law, although he may see delegation of legislative powers, as it certainly
to it that the corresponding provincial officials does, said Section 68, as part of the Revised
take appropriate disciplinary action therefor. Administrative Code, approved on March 10,
1917, must be deemed repealed by the
Neither may he vote, set aside or annul an subsequent adoption of the Constitution, in
ordinance passed by said council within the 1935, which is utterly incompatible and
scope of its jurisdiction, no matter how inconsistent with said statutory enactment.
patently unwise it may be. He may not even
suspend an elective official of a regular a. Completeness Test
municipality or take any disciplinary action
against him, except on appeal from a decision Ideally, the law must be complete in all
of the corresponding provincial board.
its essential terms and conditions when it
Upon the other hand, if the President could leaves the legislature so that there will be
create a municipality, he could, in effect, nothing left for the delegate to do when it
remove any of its officials, by creating a new reaches him except enforce it. A law is
municipality and including therein the barrio complete when it sets forth therein the
the President, belongs the power to enforce Under the 2013 PDAF Article, the statutory
laws; and to the judicial branch of authority of legislators to identify projects
government, through the Court, belongs the post-GAA may be construed from the import
power to interpret laws. Because the three of Special Provisions 1 to 3 as well as the
great powers have been, by constitutional second paragraph of Special Provision 4. To
design, ordained in this respect, “[e]ach elucidate, Special Provision 1 embodies the
department of the government has exclusive program menu feature which, as evinced from
cognizance of matters within its jurisdiction, past PDAF Articles, allows individual
and is supreme within its own sphere.” Thus, legislators to identify PDAF projects for as
“the legislature has no authority to execute or long as theidentified project falls under a
construe the law, the executive has no general program listed in the said menu.
authority to make or construe the law, and the Relatedly, Special Provision 2 provides that
judiciary has no power to make or execute the the implementing agencies shall, within 90
law.” The principle of separation of powers days from the GAA is passed, submit to
and its concepts of autonomy and Congress a more detailed priority list,
independence stem from the notion that the standard or design prepared and submitted by
powers of government must be divided to implementing agencies from which the
avoid concentration of these powers in any one legislator may make his choice.
branch; the division, it is hoped, would avoid
any single branch from lording its power over The same provision further authorizes
the other branches or the citizenry. To achieve legislators to identify PDAF projects outside
this purpose, the divided power must be his district for as long as the representative of
wielded by co-equal branches of government the district concerned concurs in writing.
that are equally capable of independent action Meanwhile, Special Provision 3 clarifies that
in exercising their respective mandates. Lack PDAF projects refer to “projects to be
of independence would result in the inability identified by legislators” and thereunder
of one branch of government to check the provides the allocation limit for the total
arbitrary or self interest assertions of another amount of projects identified by each
or others. legislator. Finally, paragraph 2 of Special
Provision 4 requires that any modification and
Broadly speaking, there is a violation of the revision of the project identification “shall be
separation of powers principle when one submitted to the House Committee on
branch of government unduly encroaches on Appropriations and the Senate Committee on
the domain of another. US Supreme Court Finance for favorable endorsement to the
decisions instruct that the principle of DBM or the implementing agency, as the case
separation of powers may be violated in two may be.” From the foregoing special
(2) ways: firstly, “[o]ne branch may interfere provisions, it cannot be seriously doubted that
impermissibly with the other’s performance of legislators have been accorded post-enactment
its constitutionally assigned function”; and authority to identify PDAF projects.
“[a]lter natively, the doctrine may be violated
when one branch assumes a function that Aside from the area of project identification,
more properly is entrusted to another.” In legislators have also been accorded post-
other words, there is a violation of the enactment authority in the areas of fund
principle when there is impermissible (a) release and realignment. Under the 2013
interference with and/or (b) assumption of PDAF Article, the statutory authority of
another department’s functions. legislators to participate in the area of fund
release through congressional committees is
At its core, legislators — may it be through contained in Special Provision5 which
project lists, prior consultations or program explicitly states that “[a]ll request for release
menus — have been consistently accorded of funds shall be supported by the documents
post-enactment authority to identify the prescribed under Special Provision No. 1 and
projects they desire to be funded through favorably endorsed by House Committee on
various Congressional Pork Barrel allocations. Appropriations and the Senate Committee on
Finance, as the case may be”; while their merely recommendatory and, as such,
statutory authority to participate in the area respondents’ reliance on the same falters
of fund realignment is contained in: first, altogether.
paragraph 2, Special Provision 4189 which
explicitly states, among others, that “[a]ny b. Yes.
realignment [of funds] shall be submitted to As an adjunct to the separation of powers
the House Committee on Appropriations and principle, legislative power shall be
the Senate Committee on Finance for exclusively exercised by the body to which the
favorable endorsement to the DBM or the Constitution has conferred the same. In
implementing agency, as the case may be”; particular, Section 1, Article VI of the 1987
and, second, paragraph 1, also of Special Constitution states that such power shall be
Provision 4 which authorizes the “Secretaries vested in the Congress of the Philippines
of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Interior which shall consist of a Senate and a House of
and Local Government, Labor and Representatives, except to the extent reserved
Employment, Public Works and Highways, to the people by the provision on initiative and
Social Welfare and Development and Trade referendum. Based on this provision, it is
and Industry x x x to approve realignment clear that only Congress, acting as a
from one project/scope to another within the bicameral body, and the people, through the
allotment received from this Fund, subject to process of initiative and referendum, may
[among others] (iii) the request is with the constitutionally wield legislative power and no
concurrence of the legislator concerned.” other. This premise embodies the principle of
non-delegability of legislative power, and the
Clearly, these post-enactment measures which only recognized exceptions thereto would be:
govern the areas of project identification, fund (a) delegated legislative power to local
release and fund realignment are not related governments which, by immemorial practice,
to functions of congressional oversight and, are allowed to legislate on purely local
hence, allow legislators to intervene and/or matters; and (b) constitutionally-grafted
assume duties that properly belong to the exceptions such as the authority of the
sphere of budget execution. Indeed, by virtue President to, by law, exercise powers
of the foregoing, legislators have been, in one necessary and proper to carry out a declared
form or another, authorized to participate in national policy in times of war or other
— as Guingona, Jr. puts it — “the various national emergency, or fix within specified
operational aspects of budgeting,” including limits, and subject to such limitations and
“the evaluation of work and financial plans for restrictions as Congress may impose, tariff
individual activities” and the “regulation and rates, import and export quotas, tonnage and
release of funds” in violation of the separation wharfage dues, and other duties or imposts
of powers principle. The fundamental rule, as within the framework of the national develop-
categorically articulated in Abakada, cannot ment program of the Government.
be overstated — from the moment the law
becomes effective, any provision of law that Notably, the principle of non-delegability
empowers Congress or any of its members to should not be confused as a restriction to
play any role in the implementation or delegate rule-making authority to
enforcement of the law violates the principle implementing agencies for the limited purpose
of separation of powers and is thus of either filling up the details of the law for its
unconstitutional. That the said authority is enforcement (supplementary rule-making)
treated as merely recommendatory in nature or ascertaining facts to bring the law into
does not alter its unconstitutional tenor since actual operation (contingent rulemaking).
the prohibition, to repeat, covers any role in
the implementation or enforcement of the law. In the cases at bar, the Court observes that
Towards this end, the Court must therefore the 2013 PDAF Article, insofar as it confers
abandon its ruling in Philconsa which post-enactment identification authority to
sanctioned the conduct of legislator individual legislators, violates the principle of
identification on the guise that the same is non-delegability since said legislators are
constitutionally flawed since it would then the Constitution “does not provide or prescribe
operate as a prohibited form of lump-sum any particular form of words or religious
appropriation as above-characterized. In recitals in which an authorization or
particular, the lump-sum amount of P24.79 appropriation by Congress shall be made,
Billion would be treated as a mere funding except that it be “made by law,’” an
source allotted for multiple purposes of appropriation law may — according to
spending, i.e., scholarships, medical missions, Philconsa — be “detailed and as broad as
assistance to indigents, preservation of Congress wants it to be” for as long as the
historical materials, construction of roads, intent to appropriate may be gleaned from the
flood control, etc. This setup connotes that the same.
appropriation law leaves the actual amounts
and purposes of the appropriation for further Thus, based on the foregoing, the Court
determination and, therefore, does not readily cannot sustain the argument that the
indicate a discernible item which may be appropriation must be the “primary and
subject to the President’s power of item veto. specific” purpose of the law in order for a valid
appropriation law to exist. To reiterate, if a
In fact, on the accountability side, the same legal provision designates a determinate or
lump-sumbudgeting scheme has, as the CoA determinable amount of money and allocates
Chairperson relays, “limit[ed] state auditors the same for a particular public purpose, then
from obtaining relevant data and information the legislative intent to appropriate becomes
that would aid in more stringently auditing apparent and, hence, already sufficient to
the utilization of said Funds.” Accordingly, she satisfy the requirement of an “appropriation
recommends the adoption of a “line by line made by law” under contemplation of the
budget or amount per proposed program, Constitution.
activity or project, and per implementing
agency.” Analyzing the legal text vis-à-vis the above-
mentioned principles, it may then be
Hence, in view of the reasons above-stated, concluded that (a) Section 8 of PD 910, which
the Court finds the 2013 PDAF Article, as well creates a Special Fund comprised of “all fees,
as all Congressional Pork Barrel Laws of revenues, and receipts of the [Energy
similar operation, to be unconstitutional. That Development] Board from any and all sources”
such budgeting system provides for a greater (a determinableamount) “to be used to
degree of flexibility to account for future finance energy resource development and
contingencies cannot be an excuse to defeat exploitation programs and projects of the
what the Constitution requires. Clearly, the government and for such other purposes as
first and essential truth of the matter is that may be hereafter directed by the President” (a
unconstitutional means do not justify even specified publicpurpose), and (b) Section
commendable ends. 12 of PD 1869, as amended by PD 1993, which
similarly sets aside, “[a]fter deducting five
2. a. Yes. (5%) percent as Franchise Tax, the Fifty (50%)
“An appropriation made by law” under the percent share of the Government in the
contemplation of Section 29(1), Article VI of aggregate gross earnings of [PAGCOR], or
the 1987 Constitution exists when a provision 60%[,] if the aggregate gross earnings be less
of law (a) sets apart adeterminate or than P150,000,000.00” (also adeterminable
determinableamount of money and (b) amount) “to finance the priority infra-
allocates the same for a particular public structure development projects and x x x the
purpose. These two minimum designations of restoration of damaged or destroyed facilities
amount and purpose stem from the very due to calamities, as may be directed and
definition of the word “appropriation,” which authorized by the Office of the President of
means “to allot, assign, set apart or apply to a the Philippines” (also a specifiedpublic
particular use or purpose,” and hence, if purpose), are legal appropriations under
written into the law, demonstrate that the Section 29(1), Article VI of the 1987
legislative intent toappropriate exists. As Constitution.
may be hereafter directed by the President” of facility. This may be deduced from its
under the same provision of law should lexicographic definition as follows: “[t]he
nonetheless be stricken down as underlying framework of a system, [especially]
unconstitutional as it lies independently public services and facilities (such as
unfettered by any sufficient standard of the highways, schools, bridges, sewers, and water-
delegating law. This notwithstanding, it must systems) needed to support commerce as well
be underscored that the rest of Section 8, as economic and residential development.” In
insofar as it allows for the use of the fine, the phrase “to finance the priority
Malampaya Funds “to finance energy resource infrastructure development projects” must be
development and exploitation programs and stricken down as unconstitutional since —
projects of the government,” remains legally similar to the above-assailed provision under
effective andsubsisting. Truth be told, the Section 8 of PD 910 — it lies independently
declared unconstitutionality of the unfettered by any sufficient standard of the
aforementioned phrase is but an assurance delegating law. As they are severable, all
that the Malampaya Funds would be used — other provisions of Section 12 of PD 1869, as
as it should be used — only in accordance with amended by PD 1993, remains legally
the avowed purpose and intention of PD 910. effective and subsisting.
Section 25. After the expiration in 1991 inequalities, and remove cultural
of the Agreement between the inequities by equitably diffusing wealth
Republic of the Philippines and the and political power for the common good.
United States of America concerning
military bases, foreign military bases, To this end, the State shall regulate the
troops, or facilities shall not be allowed acquisition, ownership, use, and dispo-
in the Philippines except under a treaty sition of property and its increments.
duly concurred in by the Senate and,
when the Congress so requires, ratified by (Article XIII, Sections 17-19)
a majority of the votes cast by the people
in a national referendum held for that Section 17. (1) There is hereby created an
purpose, and recognized as a treaty by the independent office called the Commission
other contracting State. on Human Rights.
2. Just and dynamic social order (2) The Commission shall be composed of
a Chairman and four Members who must
a. Social justice (Article II, Section 10) be natural-born citizens of the Philippines
and a majority of whom shall be members
Section 10. The State shall promote of the Bar. The term of office and other
social justice in all phases of national qualifications and disabilities of the
development. Members of the Commission shall be
provided by law.
(Article XII, Section 1(2))
(3) Until this Commission is constituted,
Section 1. x x x the existing Presidential Committee on
Human Rights shall continue to exercise
The State shall promote its present functions and powers.
industrialization and full
employment based on sound (4) The approved annual appropriations of
agricultural development and the Commission shall be automatically
agrarian reform, through industries and regularly released.
that make full and efficient use of human
and natural resources, and which are Section 18. The Commission on Human
competitive in both domestic and foreign Rights shall have the following powers
markets. However, the State shall protect and functions:
Filipino enterprises against unfair foreign
competition and trade practices. (1) Investigate, on its own or on complaint
by any party, all forms of human rights
xxx violations involving civil and political
rights;
b. Respect for human dignity and human
rights (Article XIII, Section 1) (2) Adopt its operational guidelines and
rules of procedure, and cite for contempt
Section 1. The Congress shall give highest for violations thereof in accordance with
priority to the enactment of measures the Rules of Court;
that protect and enhance the right of
all the people to human dignity, (3) Provide appropriate legal measures for
reduce social, economic, and political the protection of human rights of all
persons within the Philippines, as well as
(4) Exercise visitorial powers over jails, (Article XIII, Section 14)
prisons, or detention facilities;
Section 14. The State shall protect
(5) Establish a continuing program of working women by providing safe
research, education, and information to and healthful working conditions,
enhance respect for the primacy of human taking into account their maternal
rights; functions, and such facilities and
opportunities that will enhance their
(6) Recommend to Congress effective welfare and enable them to realize their
measures to promote human rights and to full potential in the service of the nation.
provide for compensation to victims of
violations of human rights, or their - RA 9262 – Anti Violence Against Women
families; and their Children (2004)
Rosalie Jaype-Garcia filed for herself and in that power. And VAW is a form of men’s
behalf of her minor children a petition for the expression of controlling women to retain
issuance of a temporary protection order power.
against her husband Jesus Garcia pursuant to
RA 9262 or the Violence Against Women and The United Nations, which has long
Children Act of 2002. She claimed to be a recognized VAW as a human rights issue,
victim of physical abuse; emotional, passed its Resolution 48/104 on the
psychological, and economic violence as a Declaration on Elimination of Violence
result of marital infidelity on the part of Against Women on December 20, 1993 stating
petitioner, with threats of deprivation of that “violence against women is a
custody of her children and of financial manifestation of historically unequal power
support. The RTC issued a TPO against Jesus relations between men and women, which
Garcia, ruling in favor of Jaype-Garcia. Later have led to domination over and
on, the children of Garcia were tried to get discrimination against women by men and to
kidnapped them but the kidnappers failed to the prevention of the full advancement of
do so, leading for the children to file another women, and that violence against women is
case this time pursuant to RA 7610 against one of the crucial social mechanisms by which
Garcia. The RTC issued another TPO women are forced into subordinate positions,
extending the duration of the said order. The compared with men.”
CA affirmed the decision of the trial court.
The Philippines has been in cadence with the
Issue: half — and full — steps of all these women’s
Whether or not RA 9262 gave inequality movements. No less than Section 14, Article II
between men and women, thus violating the of our 1987 Constitution mandates the State
equal protection clause. to recognize the role of women in nation
building and to ensure the fundamental
Held: equality before the law of women and men.
No. Our Senate has ratified the CEDAW as well
The unequal power relationship between as the Convention on the Rights of the Child
women and men; the fact that women are and its two protocols. To cap it all, Congress,
more likely than men to be victims of violence; on March 8, 2004, enacted Rep. Act No. 9262,
and the widespread gender bias and prejudice entitled “An Act Defining Violence Against
against women all make for real differences Women and Their Children, Providing for
justifying the classification under the law. As Protective Measures for Victims, Prescribing
Justice McIntyre succinctly states, “the Penalties therefor and for other Purposes.”
accommodation of differences ... is the essence (Excerpt from Chief Justice Puno’s remarks on
of true equality.” the launching of RA 9262)
According to the Philippine Commission on The enactment of R.A. 9262 aims to address
Women (the National Machinery for Gender the discrimination brought about by biases
Equality and Women’s Empowerment), and prejudices against women. As emphasized
violence against women (VAW) is deemed to by the CEDAW Committee on the Elimination
be closely linked with the unequal power of Discrimination against Women, addressing
relationship between women and men or correcting discrimination through specific
otherwise known as “gender-based violence”. measures focused on women does not
Societal norms and traditions dictate people to discriminate against men. Petitioner’s
think men are the leaders, pursuers, contention, therefore, that R.A. 9262 is
providers, and take on dominant roles in discriminatory and that it is an “anti-male,”
society while women are nurturers, men’s “husband-bashing,” and “hate-men” law
companions and supporters, and take on deserves scant consideration.
subordinate roles in society. This perception
leads to men gaining more power over women. As a State Party to the CEDAW, the
With power comes the need to control to retain Philippines bound itself to take all
Section 23. The State shall encourage People's organizations are bona fide
non-governmental, community-based, associations of citizens with demonstrated
or sectoral organizations that capacity to promote the public interest
promote the welfare of the nation. and with identifiable leadership,
membership, and structure.
(Article XIII, Sections 15-16)
Section 16. The right of the people and
Section 15. The State shall respect the their organizations to effective and
role of independent people's reasonable participation at all levels
organizations to enable the people to of social, political, and economic
pursue and protect, within the democratic decision-making shall not be abridged.
framework, their legitimate and collective The State shall, by law, facilitate the
interests and aspirations through establishment of adequate consultation
peaceful and lawful means. mechanisms.
Section 5. (1) the State shall take into The regional languages are the auxiliary
account regional and sectoral needs and official languages in the regions and shall
conditions and shall encourage local serve as auxiliary media of instruction
planning in the development of therein.
educational policies and programs.
Spanish and Arabic shall be promoted on
(2) Academic freedom shall be enjoyed in a voluntary and optional basis.
all institutions of higher learning.
Section 8. This Constitution shall be
(3) Every citizen has a right to select a promulgated in Filipino and English and
profession or course of study, subject to shall be translated into major regional
fair, reasonable, and equitable admission languages, Arabic, and Spanish.
and academic requirements.
Section 9. The Congress shall establish a
(4) The State shall enhance the right of national language commission composed
teachers to professional advancement. of representatives of various regions and
Non-teaching academic and non-academic disciplines which shall undertake,
personnel shall enjoy the protection of the coordinate, and promote researches for
State. the development, propagation, and
preservation of Filipino and other
(5) The State shall assign the highest languages.
budgetary priority to education and
ensure that teaching will attract and SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
retain its rightful share of the best
available talents through adequate Section 10. Science and technology are
remuneration and other means of job essential for national development and
satisfaction and fulfillment. progress. The State shall give priority to
research and development, invention,
LANGUAGE innovation, and their utilization; and to
science and technology education,
Section 6. The national language of the training, and services. It shall support
Philippines is Filipino. As it evolves, it indigenous, appropriate, and self-reliant
shall be further developed and enriched scientific and technological capabilities,
and their application to the country's the protection of the State which may
productive systems and national life. regulate its disposition.
Section 11. The Congress may provide for Section 17. The State shall recognize,
incentives, including tax deductions, to respect, and protect the rights of
encourage private participation in indigenous cultural communities to
programs of basic and applied scientific preserve and develop their cultures,
research. Scholarships, grants-in-aid, or traditions, and institutions. It shall
other forms of incentives shall be provided consider these rights in the formulation of
to deserving science students, national plans and policies.
researchers, scientists, inventors,
technologists, and specially gifted citizens. Section 18. (1) The State shall ensure
equal access to cultural opportunities
Section 12. The State shall regulate the through the educational system, public or
transfer and promote the adaptation of private cultural entities, scholarships,
technology from all sources for the grants and other incentives, and
national benefit. It shall encourage the community cultural centers, and other
widest participation of private groups, public venues.
local governments, and community-based
organizations in the generation and (2) The State shall encourage and support
utilization of science and technology. researches and studies on the arts and
culture.
Section 13. The State shall protect and
secure the exclusive rights of scientists, SPORTS
inventors, artists, and other gifted
citizens to their intellectual property and Section 19. (1) The State shall promote
creations, particularly when beneficial to physical education and encourage sports
the people, for such period as may be programs, league competitions, and
provided by law. amateur sports, including training for
international competitions, to foster self-
ARTS AND CULTURE discipline, teamwork, and excellence for
the development of a healthy and alert
Section 14. The State shall foster the citizenry.
preservation, enrichment, and dynamic
evolution of a Filipino national culture (2) All educational institutions shall
based on the principle of unity in diversity undertake regular sports activities
in a climate of free artistic and throughout the country in cooperation
intellectual expression. with athletic clubs and other sectors.
Section 15. Arts and letters shall enjoy f.Urban land reform and housing (Article
the patronage of the State. The State XIII, Sections 9-10)
shall conserve, promote, and popularize
the nation's historical and cultural Section 9. The State shall, by law, and for
heritage and resources, as well as artistic the common good, undertake, in
creations. cooperation with the private sector, a
continuing program of urban land
Section 16. All the country's artistic and reform and housing which will make
historic wealth constitutes the cultural available at affordable cost, decent
treasure of the nation and shall be under housing and basic services to under-
(a) Uplift the conditions of the (f) Improve the capability of local
underprivileged and homeless citizens in government units in undertaking urban
urban areas and in resettlement areas by development and housing programs and
making available to them decent housing projects.
at affordable cost, basic services, and
employment opportunities; g. Reform in agriculture and other natural
resources (Article II, Section 21)
(b) Provide for the rational use and
development of urban land in order to Section 21. The State shall promote
bring about the following: comprehensive rural development
and agrarian reform.
(1) Equitable utilization of residential
lands in urban and urbanizable areas (Article XIII, Sections 4-8)
with particular attention to the needs and
requirements of the underprivileged and Section 4. The State shall, by law,
homeless citizens and not merely on the undertake an agrarian reform
basis of market forces; program founded on the right of
farmers and regular farmworkers Section 7. The State shall protect the
who are landless, to own directly or rights of subsistence fishermen,
collectively the lands they till or, in the especially of local communities, to the
case of other farmworkers, to receive a preferential use of the communal
just share of the fruits thereof. To this marine and fishing resources, both
end, the State shall encourage and inland and offshore. It shall provide
undertake the just distribution of all support to such fishermen through
agricultural lands, subject to such appropriate technology and research,
priorities and reasonable retention limits adequate financial, production, and
as the Congress may prescribe, taking marketing assistance, and other services.
into account ecological, developmental, or The State shall also protect, develop, and
equity considerations, and subject to the conserve such resources. The protection
payment of just compensation. In shall extend to offshore fishing grounds of
determining retention limits, the State subsistence fishermen against foreign
shall respect the right of small intrusion. Fishworkers shall receive a just
landowners. The State shall further share from their labor in the utilization of
provide incentives for voluntary land- marine and fishing resources.
sharing.
Section 8. The State shall provide
Section 5. The State shall recognize the incentives to landowners to invest the
right of farmers, farmworkers, and proceeds of the agrarian reform
landowners, as well as cooperatives, program to promote
and other independent farmers' industrialization, employment
organizations to participate in the creation, and privatization of public
planning, organization, and sector enterprises. Financial
management of the program, and shall instruments used as payment for their
provide support to agriculture through lands shall be honored as equity in
appropriate technology and research, and enterprises of their choice.
adequate financial, production,
marketing, and other support services. - PD 27 – Land Reform Act
Since Reformation must start with the In case of default, the amortization due
emancipation of the tiller of the soil from shall be paid by the farmers' cooperative
his bondage, in which the defaulting tenant-farmer is a
member, with the cooperative having a
NOW, THEREFORE, I, FERDINAND E. right of recourse against him;
MARCOS, President of the Philippines, by
virtue of the powers vested in me by the The government shall guaranty such
Constitution as Commander-in-Chief of amortizations with shares of stock in
all the Armed Forces of the Philippines, government-owned and government-
and pursuant to Proclamation No. 1081, controlled corporations;
dated September 21, 1972, and General
Order No. 1 dated September 22, 1972, as No title to the land owned by the tenant-
amended do hereby decree and order the farmers under this Decree shall be
emancipation of all tenant farmers as of actually issued to a tenant-farmer unless
this day, October 21, 1972: and until the tenant-farmer has become a
full-fledged member of a duly recognized
This shall apply to tenant farmers of farmer's cooperative;
private agricultural lands primarily
devoted to rice and corn under a system of Title to land acquired pursuant to this
sharecrop or lease-tenancy, whether Decree or the Land Reform Program of
classified as landed estate or not; the Government shall not be transferable
except by hereditary succession or to the
The tenant farmer, whether in land Government in accordance with the
classified as landed estate or not, shall be provisions of this Decree, the Code of
deemed owner of a portion constituting a Agrarian Reforms and other existing laws
family-size farm of five (5) hectares if not and regulations;
irrigated and three (3) hectares if
irrigated; The Department of Agrarian Reform
through its Secretary is hereby
In all cases, the landowner may retain an empowered to promulgate rules and
area of not more than seven (7) hectares if regulations for the implementation of this
such landowner is cultivating such area or Decree.
will now cultivate it;
All laws, executive orders, decrees and
For the purpose of determining the cost of rules and regulations, or parts thereof,
the land to be transferred to the tenant- inconsistent with this Decree are hereby
farmer pursuant to this Decree, the value repealed and or modified accordingly.
of the land shall be equivalent to two and
one-half (2 1/2) times the average harvest Done in the City of Manila, this 21st day
of three normal crop years immediately of October, in the year of Our Lord,
preceding the promulgation of this nineteen hundred and seventy-two.
Decree;
- RA 6657 -Comprehensive and Agrarian
The total cost of the land, including Reform Law (1998)
interest at the rate of six (6) per centum
per annum, shall be paid by the tenant in Section 2. Declaration of Principles and
fifteen (15) years of fifteen (15) equal Policies. — It is the policy of the State to
annual amortizations; pursue a Comprehensive Agrarian Reform
Program (CARP). The welfare of the production, marketing and other support
landless farmers and farmworkers will services.
receive the highest consideration to
promote social justice and to move the The State shall apply the principles of
nation toward sound rural development agrarian reform, or stewardship,
and industrialization, and the whenever applicable, in accordance with
establishment of owner cultivatorship of law, in the disposition or utilization of
economic-size farms as the basis of other natural resources, including lands
Philippine agriculture. of the public domain, under lease or
concession, suitable to agriculture, subject
To this end, a more equitable distribution to prior rights, homestead rights of small
and ownership of land, with due regard to settlers and the rights of indigenous
the rights of landowners to just communities to their ancestral lands.
compensation and to the ecological needs
of the nation, shall be undertaken to The State may resettle landless farmers
provide farmers and farmworkers with and farmworkers in its own agricultural
the opportunity to enhance their dignity estates, which shall be distributed to
and improve the quality of their lives them in the manner provided by law.
through greater productivity of
agricultural lands. By means of appropriate incentives, the
State shall encourage the formation and
The agrarian reform program is founded maintenance of economic-size family
on the right of farmers and regular farms to be constituted by individual
farmworkers, who are landless, to own beneficiaries and small landowners.
directly or collectively the lands they till
or, in the case of other farm workers, to The State shall protect the rights of
receive a just share of the fruits thereof. subsistence fishermen, especially of local
To this end, the State shall encourage and communities, to the preferential use of
undertake the just distribution of all communal marine and fishing resources,
agricultural lands, subject to the priorities both inland and offshore.t shall provide
and retention limits set forth in this Act, support to such fishermen through
having taken into account ecological, appropriate technology and research,
developmental, and equity considerations, adequate financial, production and
and subject to the payment of just marketing assistance and other services.
compensation. The State shall respect the The State shall also protect, develop and
right of small landowners, and shall conserve such resources. The protection
provide incentives for voluntary land- shall extend to offshore fishing grounds of
sharing. subsistence fishermen against foreign
intrusion. Fishworkers shall receive a just
The State shall recognize the right of share from their labor in the utilization of
farmers, farmworkers and landowners, as marine and fishing resources.
well as cooperatives and other
independent farmers' organizations, to The State shall be guided by the
participate in the planning, organization, principles that land has a social function
and management of the program, and and land ownership has a social
shall provide support to agriculture responsibility. Owners of agricultural
through appropriate technology and lands have the obligation to cultivate
research, and adequate financial directly or through labor administration
the lands they own and thereby make the processes affecting their rights and
land productive. benefits as may be provided by law.
The State shall provide incentives to The State shall promote the principle
landowners to invest the proceeds of the of shared responsibility between
agrarian reform program to promote workers and employers and the
industrialization, employment and preferential use of voluntary modes
privatization of public sector enterprises. in settling disputes, including
Financial instruments used as payment conciliation, and shall enforce their
for lands shall contain features that shall mutual compliance therewith to foster
enhance negotiability and acceptability in industrial peace.
the marketplace.
The State shall regulate the relations
The State may lease undeveloped lands of between workers and employers,
the public domain to qualified entities for recognizing the right of labor to its just
the development of capital-intensive share in the fruits of production and the
farms, and traditional and pioneering right of enterprises to reasonable returns
crops especially those for exports subject to investments, and to expansion and
to the prior rights of the beneficiaries growth.
under this Act.
- PD 442 – Labor Code of the Philippines
h. Protection to labor (Article II, Section
18) Article 3. Declaration of basic policy. —
The State shall afford protection to
Section 18. The State affirms labor as a labor, promote full employment,
primary social economic force. It shall ensure equal work opportunities
protect the rights of workers and promote regardless of sex, race or creed and
their welfare. regulate the relations between
workers and employers. The State
(Article XIII, Section 3) shall assure the rights of workers to
self-organization, collective
Section 3. The State shall afford full bargaining, security of tenure, and
protection to labor, local and overseas, just and humane conditions of work.
organized and unorganized, and
promote full employment and i. Promotion of health and ecology (Article
equality of employment II, Sections 15 and 16)
opportunities for all.
Section 15. The State shall protect and
It shall guarantee the rights of all promote the right to health of the
workers to self-organization, people and instill health consciousness
collective bargaining and among them.
negotiations, and peaceful concerted
activities, including the right to Section 16. The State shall protect and
strike in accordance with law. They shall advance the right of the people to a
be entitled to security of tenure, balanced and healthful ecology in
humane conditions of work, and a accord with the rhythm and harmony of
living wage. They shall also participate nature.
in policy and decision-making
(d) The State also recognizes the role of Section 15. The State shall respect the
the private sector in promoting the role of independent people's
welfare of persons with disability and organizations to enable the people to
shall encourage partnership in programs pursue and protect, within the democratic
that address their needs and concerns. framework, their legitimate and collective
interests and aspirations through
(e) To facilitate integration of persons peaceful and lawful means.
with disability into the mainstream of
society, the State shall advocate for and People's organizations are bona fide
encourage respect for persons with associations of citizens with demonstrated
disability. The State shall exert all efforts capacity to promote the public interest
to remove all social, cultural, economic, and with identifiable leadership,
environmental and attitudinal barriers membership, and structure.
that are prejudicial to persons with
disability. Section 16. The right of the people and
their organizations to effective and
j. Self-reliant and independent economic reasonable participation at all levels
order (Article II, Sections 19-20) of social, political, and economic
decision-making shall not be abridged.
Section 19. The State shall develop a The State shall, by law, facilitate the
self-reliant and independent national establishment of adequate consultation
economy effectively controlled by mechanisms.
Filipinos.
3. The family and role of the youth(Article
Section 20. The State recognizes the II, Sections 12 and 13)
indispensable role of the private sector,
(1) The right of spouses to found a family Article 1. Marriage is a special contract of
in accordance with their religious permanent union between a man and a
convictions and the demands of woman entered into in accordance with
responsible parenthood; the law for the establishment of conjugal
and family life. It is the foundation of the
(2) The right of children to assistance, family and an inviolable social institution
including proper care and nutrition, and whose nature, consequences, and
incidents are governed by law and not
subject to stipulation, except that The child is not a mere creature of the
marriage settlements may fix the State. Hence, his individual traits and
property relations during the marriage aptitudes should be cultivated to the
within the limits provided by this Code. utmost insofar as they do not conflict with
(52a) the general welfare.
shall protect and promote the right to and implementation of policies and
health of women especially mothers in programs
particular and of the people in general
and instill health consciousness among The State likewise guarantees universal
them. The family is the natural and access to medically-safe, non-
fundamental unit of society. The State abortifacient, effective, legal, affordable,
shall likewise protect and advance the and quality reproductive health care
right of families in particular and the services, methods, devices, supplies which
people in general to a balanced and do not prevent the implantation of a
healthful environment in accord with the fertilized ovum as determined by the Food
rhythm and harmony of nature. The State and Drug Administration (FDA) and
also recognizes and guarantees the relevant information and education
promotion and equal protection of the thereon according to the priority needs of
welfare and rights of children, the youth, women, children and other
and the unborn. underprivileged sectors, giving
preferential access to those identified
Moreover, the State recognizes and through the National Household
guarantees the promotion of gender Targeting System for Poverty Reduction
equality, gender equity, women (NHTS-PR) and other government
empowerment and dignity as a health and measures of identifying marginalization,
human rights concern and as a social who shall be voluntary beneficiaries of
responsibility. The advancement and reproductive health care, services and
protection of women’s human rights shall supplies for free.
be central to the efforts of the State to
address reproductive health care. The State shall eradicate discriminatory
practices, laws and policies that infringe
The State recognizes marriage as an on a person’s exercise of reproductive
inviolable social institution and the health rights.
foundation of the family which in turn is
the foundation of the nation. Pursuant The State shall also promote openness to
thereto, the State shall defend: life; Provided, That parents bring forth to
the world only those children whom they
(a) The right of spouses to found a family can raise in a truly humane way.
in accordance with their religious
convictions and the demands of Imbong vs. Ochoa, Jr.
responsible parenthood; G. R. No. 204819, 8 April 2014
721 SCRA 146
(b) The right of children to assistance,
Facts:
including proper care and nutrition, and
James Imbong and other petitioners
special protection from all forms of questioned the constitutionality and validity
neglect, abuse, cruelty, exploitation, and of Republic Act No. 10354 or the Reproductive
other conditions prejudicial to their Health Act of 2012 on the following grounds:
development; violation on the right to life of the unborn,
right to health and protection against
(c) The right of the family to a family hazardous products, right to religious
living wage and income; and freedom, right to marital privacy in the
family, and among others indicated under
(d) The right of families or family their petitions.
associations to participate in the planning
Textually, the Constitution affords protection couched express the objective sought to be
to the unborn from conception. This is attained; and second, because the
undisputable because before conception, there Constitution is not primarily a lawyer’s
is no unborn to speak of. For said reason, it is document but essentially that of the people, in
no surprise that the Constitution is mute as to whose consciousness it should ever be present
any proscription prior to conception or when as an important condition for the rule of law
life begins. The problem has arisen because, to prevail.
amazingly, there are quarters who have
conveniently disregarded the scientific fact In conformity with the above principle, the
that conception is reckoned from fertilization. traditional meaning of the word “conception”
They are waving the view that life begins at which, as described and defined by all reliable
implantation. Hence, the issue of when life and reputable sources, means that life begins
begins. at fertilization. Webster’s Third New
International Dictionary describes it as the
In a nutshell, those opposing the RH Law act of becoming pregnant, formation of a
contend that conception is synonymous with viable zygote; the fertilization that results in a
“fertilization” of the female ovum by the male new entity capable of developing into a being
sperm. On the other side of the spectrum are like its parents. Black’s Law Dictionary gives
those who assert that conception refers to the legal meaning to the term “conception” as the
“implantation” of the fertilized ovum in the fecundation of the female ovum by the male
uterus. spermatozoon resulting in human life capable
of survival and maturation under normal
Plain and Legal Meaning conditions.
It is a canon in statutory construction that the Even in jurisprudence, an unborn child has
words of the Constitution should be already a legal personality. In Continental
interpreted in their plain and ordinary Steel Manufacturing Corporation v. Hon.
meaning. As held in the recent case of Chavez Accredited Voluntary Arbitrator Allan S.
v. Judicial Bar Council: Montaño, it was written:
One of the primary and basic rules in Life is not synonymous with civil personality.
statutory construction is that where the words One need not acquire civil personality first
of a statute are clear, plain, and free from before he/she could die. Even a child inside the
ambiguity, it must be given its literal meaning womb already has life. No less than the
and applied without attempted interpretation. Constitution recognizes the life of the unborn
It is a well-settled principle of constitutional from conception, that the State must protect
construction that the language employed in equally with the life of the mother. If the
the Constitution must be given their ordinary unborn already has life, then the cessation
meaning except where technical terms are thereof even prior to the child being delivered,
employed. As much as possible, the words of qualifies as death. [Emphases in the original]
the Constitution should be understood in the
sense they have in common use. What it says In Gonzales v. Carhart, Justice Anthony
according to the text of the provision to be Kennedy, writing for the US Supreme Court,
construed compels acceptance and negates the said that the State “has respect for human life
power of the courts to alter it, based on the at all stages in the pregnancy” and “a
postulate that the framers and the people legitimate and substantial interest in
mean what they say. Verba legis non est preserving and promoting fetal life.”
recedendum — from the words of a statute Invariably, in the decision, the fetus was
there should be no departure. referred to, or cited, as a baby or a child.
still in to be complied with. Thus, the Court the mandatory “shall” is to be construed as
agrees with the observation of respondent operative only after they have been tested,
Lagman that the effectivity of the RH Law evaluated, and approved by the FDA. The
will not lead to the unmitigated proliferation FDA, not Congress, has the expertise to
of contraceptives since the sale, distribution determine whether a particular hormonal
and dispensation of contraceptive drugs and contraceptive or intrauterine device is safe
devices will still require the prescription of a and non-abortifacient. The provision of the
licensed physician. With R.A. No. 4729 in third sentence concerning the requirements
place, there exists adequate safeguards to for the inclusion or removal of a particular
ensure the public that only contraceptives family planning supply from the EDL
that are safe are made available to the public. supports this construction.
Thus, in the distribution by the DOH of Stated differently, the provision in Section 9
contraceptive drugs and devices, it must covering the inclusion of hormonal
consider the provisions of R.A. No. 4729, contraceptives, intrauterine devices,
which is still in effect, and ensure that the injectables, and other safe, legal, non-
contraceptives that it will procure shall be abortifacient and effective family planning
from a duly licensed drug store or products and supplies by the
pharmaceutical company and that the actual National Drug Formulary in the EDL is not
dispensation of these contraceptive drugs and mandatory.
devices will done following a prescription of a
qualified medical practitioner. The There must first be a determination by the
distribution of contraceptive drugs and FDA that they are in fact safe, legal, non-
devices must not be indiscriminately done. abortifacient and effective family planning
The public health must be protected by all products and supplies. There can be no
possible means. As pointed out by Justice De predetermination by Congress that the gamut
Castro, a heavy responsibility and burden are of contraceptives are “safe, legal, non-
assumed by the government in supplying abortifacient and effective” without the proper
contraceptive drugs and devices, for it may be scientific examination.
held accountable for any injury, illness or loss
of life resulting from or incidental to their use. 3. No.
In the case at bench, it is not within the
At any rate, it bears pointing out that not a province of the Court to determine whether
single contraceptive has yet been submitted to the use of contraceptives or one’s participation
the FDA pursuant to the RH Law. It behooves in the support of modern reproductive health
the Court to await its determination which measures is moral from a religious standpoint
drugs or devices are declared by the FDA as or whether the same is right or wrong
safe, it being the agency tasked to ensure that according to one’s dogma or belief. For the
food and medicines available to the public are Court has declared that matters dealing with
safe for public consumption. Consequently, “faith, practice, doctrine, form of worship,
the Court finds that, at this point, the attack ecclesiastical law, custom and rule of a
on the RH Law on this ground is premature. church...are unquestionably ecclesiastical
Indeed, the various kinds of contraceptives matters which are outside the province of the
must first be measured up to the civil courts.” The jurisdiction of the Court
constitutional yardstick as expounded herein, extends only to public and secular morality.
to be determined as the case presents itself. Whatever pronouncement the Court makes in
the case at bench should be understood only in
At this point, the Court is of the strong view this realm where it has authority. Stated
that Congress cannot legislate that hormonal otherwise, while the Court stands without
contraceptives and intrauterine devices are authority to rule on ecclesiastical matters, as
safe and non-abortifacient. The first sentence vanguard of the Constitution, it does have
of Section 9 that ordains their inclusion by the authority to determine whether the RH Law
National Drug Formulary in the EDL by using
contravenes the guarantee of religious and their religious convictions. [Section 3(e),
freedom. Declaration of Policy]
At first blush, it appears that the RH Law 4. The State shall promote programs that: (1)
recognizes and respects religion and religious enable individuals and couples to have the
beliefs and convictions. It is replete with number of children they desire with due
assurances the no one can be compelled to consideration to the health, particularly of
violate the tenets of his religion or defy his women, and the resources available and
religious convictions against his free will. affordable to them and in accordance with
Provisions in the RH Law respecting religious existing laws, public morals and their
freedom are the following: religious convictions. [Section 3(f)]
1. The State recognizes and guarantees the 5. The State shall respect individuals’
human rights of all persons including their preferences and choice of family planning
right to equality and nondiscrimination of methods that are in accordance with their
these rights, the right to sustainable human religious convictions and cultural beliefs,
development, the right to health which taking into consideration the State’s
includes reproductive health, the right to obligations under various human rights
education and information, and the right to instruments. [Section 3(h)]
choose and make decisions for themselves in
accordance with their religious convictions, 6. Active participation by nongovernment
ethics, cultural beliefs, and the demands of organizations (NGOs), women’s and people’s
responsible parenthood. [Section 2, organizations, civil society, faith-based
Declaration of Policy] organizations, the religious sector and
communities is crucial to ensure that
2. The State recognizes marriage as an reproductive health and population and
inviolable social institution and the development policies, plans, and programs
foundation of the family which in turn is the will address the priority needs of women, the
foundation of the nation. Pursuant thereto, poor, and the marginalized. [Section 3(i)]
the State shall defend:
7. Responsible parenthood refers to the will
(a) The right of spouses to found a family in and ability of a parent to respond to the needs
accordance with their religious convictions and aspirations of the family and children. It
and the demands of responsible parenthood.” is likewise a shared responsibility between
[Section 2, Declaration of Policy] parents to determine and achieve the desired
number of children, spacing and timing of
3. The State shall promote and provide their children according to their own family
information and access, without bias, to all life aspirations, taking into account
methods of family planning, including psychological preparedness, health status,
effective natural and modern methods which sociocultural and economic concerns
have been proven medically safe, legal, non- consistent with their religious convictions.
abortifacient, and effective in accordance with [Section 4(v)] (Emphases supplied)
scientific and evidence-based medical research
standards such as those registered and While the Constitution prohibits abortion,
approved by the FDA for the poor and laws were enacted allowing the use of
marginalized as identified through the NHTS- contraceptives. To some medical practitioners,
PR and other government measures of however, the whole idea of using
identifying marginalization: Provided, That contraceptives is an anathema. Consistent
the State shall also provide funding support to with the principle of benevolent neutrality,
promote modern natural methods of family their beliefs should be respected.
planning, especially the Billings Ovulation
Method, consistent with the needs of acceptors The Establishment Clause and Contraceptives
In the same breath that the establishment compelling state interest in the
clause restricts what the government can do accomplishment of an important secular
with religion, it also limits what religious objective. Necessarily so, the plea of
sects can or cannot do with the government. conscientious objectors for exemption from the
They can neither cause the government to RH Law deserves no less than strict scrutiny.
adopt their particular doctrines as policy for
everyone, nor can they not cause the In applying the test, the first inquiry is
government to restrict other groups. To do so, whether a conscientious objector’s right to
in simple terms, would cause the State to religious freedom has been burdened. As in
adhere to a particular religion and, thus, Escritor, there is no doubt that an intense tug-
establishing a state religion. of-war plagues a conscientious objector. One
side coaxes him into obedience to the law and
Consequently, the petitioners are misguided the abandonment of his religious beliefs, while
in their supposition that the State cannot the other entices him to a clean conscience yet
enhance its population control program under the pain of penalty. The scenario is an
through the RH Law simply because the illustration of the predicament of medical
promotion of contraceptive use is contrary to practitioners whose religious beliefs are
their religious beliefs. Indeed, the State is not incongruent with what the RH Law promotes.
precluded to pursue its legitimate secular
objectives without being dictated upon by the The Court is of the view that the obligation to
policies of any one religion. One cannot refuse refer imposed by the RH Law violates the
to pay his taxes simply because it will cloud religious belief and conviction of a
his conscience. The demarcation line between conscientious objector. Once the medical
Church and State demands that one render practitioner, against his will, refers a patient
unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and seeking information on modern reproductive
unto God the things that are God’s. health products, services, procedures and
methods, his conscience is immediately
The Free Exercise Clause and the Duty to burdened as he has been compelled to perform
Refer an act against his beliefs. As Commissioner
Joaquin A. Bernas (Commissioner Bernas) has
While the RH Law, in espousing state policy written, “at the basis of the free exercise
to promote reproductive health manifestly clause is the respect for the inviolability of the
respects diverse religious beliefs in line with human conscience.”
the Non -Establishment Clause, the same
conclusion cannot be reached with respect to Though it has been said that the act of
Sections 7, 23 and 24 thereof. The said referral is an opt-out clause, it is, however, a
provisions commonly mandate that a hospital false compromise because it makes pro-life
or a medical practitioner to immediately refer health providers complicit in the performance
a person seeking health care and services of an act that they find morally repugnant or
under the law to another accessible healthcare offensive. They cannot, in conscience, do
provider despite their conscientious objections indirectly what they cannot do directly. One
based on religious or ethical beliefs. may not be the principal, but he is equally
guilty if he abets the offensive act by indirect
In a situation where the free exercise of participation. Moreover, the guarantee of
religion is allegedly burdened by government religious freedom is necessarily intertwined
legislation or practice, the compelling state with the right to free speech, it being an
interest test in line with the Court’s espousal externalization of one’s thought and
of the Doctrine of Benevolent Neutrality in conscience. This in turn includes the right to
Escritor, finds application. In this case, the be silent. With the constitutional guarantee of
conscientious objector’s claim to religious religious freedom follows the protection that
freedom would warrant an exemption from should be afforded to individuals in
obligations under the RH Law, unless the communicating their beliefs to others as well
government succeeds in demonstrating a more as the protection for simply being silent. The
Bill of Rights guarantees the liberty of the Freedom of religion was accorded preferred
individual to utter what is in his mind and the status by the framers of our fundamental law.
liberty not to utter what is not in his mind. And this Court has consistently affirmed this
While the RH Law seeks to provide freedom of preferred status, well aware that it is
choice through informed consent, freedom of “designed to protect the broadest possible
choice guarantees the liberty of the religious liberty of conscience, to allow each man to
conscience and prohibits any degree of believe as his conscience directs, to profess his
compulsion or burden, whether direct or beliefs, and to live as he believes he ought to
indirect, in the practice of one’s religion. live, consistent with the liberty of others and
with the common good.”
In case of conflict between the religious beliefs
and moral convictions of individuals, on one The Court is not oblivious to the view that
hand, and the interest of the State, on the penalties provided by law endeavour to ensure
other, to provide access and information on compliance. Without set consequences for
reproductive health products, services, either an active violation or mere inaction, a
procedures and methods to enable the people law tends to be toothless and ineffectual.
to determine the timing, number and spacing Nonetheless, when what is bartered for an
of the birth of their children, the Court is of effective implementation of a law is a
the strong view that the religious freedom of constitutionally-protected right the Court
health providers, whether public or private, firmly chooses to stamp its disapproval. The
should be accorded primacy. Accordingly, a punishment of a healthcare service provider,
conscientious objector should be exempt from who fails and/or refuses to refer a patient to
compliance with the mandates of the RH Law. another, or who declines to perform
If he would be compelled to act contrary to his reproductive health procedure on a patient
religious belief and conviction, it would be because incompatible religious beliefs, is a
violative of “the principle of non-coercion” clear inhibition of a constitutional guarantee
enshrined in the constitutional right to free which the Court cannot allow.
exercise of religion.
The Implementing Rules and Regulation (RH-
Institutional Health Providers IRR)
The same holds true with respect to non- The last paragraph of Section 5.24 of the RH-
maternity specialty hospitals and hospitals IRR reads:
owned and operated by a religious group and
health care service providers. Considering Provided, That skilled health professional
that Section 24 of the RH Law penalizes such such as provincial, city or municipal health
institutions should they fail or refuse to officers, chiefs of hospital, head nurses,
comply with their duty to refer under Section supervising midwives, among others, who by
7 and Section 23(a)(3), the Court deems that it virtue of their office are specifically charged
must be struck down for being violative of the with the duty to implement the provisions of
freedom of religion. The same applies to the RPRH Act and these Rules, cannot be
Section 23(a)(1) and (a)(2) in relation to considered as conscientious objectors.
Section 24, considering that in the
dissemination of information regarding This is discriminatory and violative of the
programs and services and in the performance equal protection clause. The conscientious
of reproductive health procedures, the objection clause should be equally protective
religious freedom of health care service of the religious belief of public health officers.
providers should be respected. There is no perceptible distinction why they
should not be considered exempt from the
In the case of Islamic Da’wah Council of the mandates of the law. The protection accorded
Philippines, Inc. v. Office of the Executive to other conscientious objectors should equally
Secretary, it was stressed: apply to all medical practitioners without
distinction whether they belong to the public
or private sector. After all, the freedom to Apparently, in these cases, there is no
believe is intrinsic in every individual and the immediate danger to the life or health of an
protective robe that guarantees its free individual in the perceived scenario of the
exercise is not taken off even if one acquires subject provisions. After all, a couple who
employment in the government. plans the timing, number and spacing of the
birth of their children refers to a future event
It should be stressed that intellectual liberty that is contingent on whether or not the
occupies a place inferior to none in the mother decides to adopt or use the
hierarchy of human values. The mind must be information, product, method or supply given
free to think what it wills, whether in the to her or whether she even decides to become
secular or religious sphere, to give expression pregnant at all. On the other hand, the
to its beliefs by oral discourse or through the burden placed upon those who object to
media and, thus, seek other candid views in contraceptive use is immediate and occurs the
occasions or gatherings or in more permanent moment a patient seeks consultation on
aggrupation. Embraced in such concept then reproductive health matters.
are freedom of religion, freedom of speech, of
the press, assembly and petition, and freedom Moreover, granting that a compelling interest
of association. exists to justify the infringement of the
conscientious objector’s religious freedom, the
Compelling State Interest respondents have failed to demonstrate “the
gravest abuses, endangering paramount
The foregoing discussion then begets the interests” which could limit or override a
question on whether the respondents, in person’s fundamental right to religious
defense of the subject provisions, were able to: freedom. Also, the respondents have not
1] demonstrate a more compelling state presented any government effort exerted to
interest to restrain conscientious objectors in show that the means it takes to achieve its
their choice of services to render; and 2] legitimate state objective is the least intrusive
discharge the burden of proof that the means.
obligatory character of the law is the least
intrusive means to achieve the objectives of Other than the assertion that the act of
the law. referring would only be momentary,
considering that the act of referral by a
Resultantly, the Court finds no compelling conscientious objector is the very action being
state interest which would limit the free contested as violative of religious freedom, it
exercise clause of the conscientious objectors, behooves the respondents to demonstrate that
however few in number. Only the prevention no other means can be undertaken by the
of an immediate and grave danger to the State to achieve its objective without violating
security and welfare of the community can the rights of the conscientious objector. The
justify the infringement of religious freedom. health concerns of women may still be
If the government fails to show the addressed by other practitioners who may
seriousness and immediacy of the threat, perform reproductive health-related
State intrusion is constitutionally procedures with open willingness and
unacceptable. motivation. Suffice it to say, a person who is
forced to perform an act in utter reluctance
Freedom of religion means more than just the deserves the protection of the Court as the
freedom to believe. It also means the freedom last vanguard of constitutional freedoms.
to act or not to act according to what one
believes. And this freedom is violated when Exception: Life Threatening Cases
one is compelled to act against one’s belief or
is prevented from acting according to one’s All this notwithstanding, the Court properly
belief. recognizes a valid exception set forth in the
law. While generally healthcare service
providers cannot be forced to render
reproductive health care procedures if doing it find unacceptable, and retain the freedom to
would contravene their religious beliefs, an decide on matters of family life without the
exception must be made in life-threatening intervention of the State.
cases that require the performance of
emergency procedures. In these situations, the 4. No.
right to life of the mother should be given In this case, the RH Law, in its not-so-hidden
preference, considering that a referral by a desire to control population growth, contains
medical practitioner would amount to a denial provisions which tend to wreck the family as a
of service, resulting to unnecessarily placing solid social institution. It bars the husband
the life of a mother in grave danger. Thus, and/or the father from participating in the
during the oral arguments, Atty. Liban, decision-making process regarding their
representing CFC, manifested: “the forced common future progeny. It likewise deprives
referral clause that we are objecting on the parents of their authority over their minor
grounds of violation of freedom of religion does daughter simply because she is already a
not contemplate an emergency.” parent or had suffered a miscarriage.
In a conflict situation between the life of the The Family and Spousal Consent
mother and the life of a child, the doctor is
morally obliged always to try to save both Section 23(a)(2)(i) of the RH Law states:
lives. If, however, it is impossible, the
resulting death to one should not be The following acts are prohibited:
deliberate.
(a) Any health care service provider, whether
Accordingly, if it is necessary to save the life public or private, who shall: ...
of a mother, procedures endangering the life of
the child may be resorted to even if is against (2) refuse to perform legal and medically-safe
the religious sentiments of the medical reproductive health procedures on any person
practitioner. As quoted above, whatever of legal age on the ground of lack of consent or
burden imposed upon a medical practitioner authorization of the following persons in the
in this case would have been more than following instances:
justified considering the life he would be able
to save. (i) Spousal consent in case of married persons:
provided, That in case of disagreement, the
Family Planning Seminars decision of the one undergoing the procedures
shall prevail. [Emphasis supplied]
Anent the requirement imposed under Section
15 as a condition for the issuance of a The above provision refers to reproductive
marriage license, the Court finds the same to health procedures like tubal litigation and
be a reasonable exercise of police power by the vasectomy which, by their very nature, should
government. A cursory reading of the assailed require mutual consent and decision between
provision bares that the religious freedom of the husband and the wife as they affect issues
the petitioners is not at all violated. All the intimately related to the founding of a family.
law requires is for would-be spouses to attend
a seminar on parenthood, family planning Section 3, Art. XV of the Constitution
breastfeeding and infant nutrition. It does not espouses that the State shall defend the “right
even mandate the type of family planning of the spouses to found a family.” One person
methods to be included in the seminar, cannot found a family. The right, therefore, is
whether they be natural or artificial. As shared by both spouses. In the same Section 3,
correctly noted by the OSG, those who receive their right “to participate in the planning and
any information during their attendance in implementation of policies and programs that
the required seminars are not compelled to affect them” is equally recognized.
accept the information given to them, are
completely free to reject the information they
The RH Law cannot be allowed to infringe Even if she is not yet emancipated, the
upon this mutual decision- making. By giving parental authority is already cut off just
absolute authority to the spouse who would because there is a need to tame population
undergo a procedure, and barring the other growth.
spouse from participating in the decision
would drive a wedge between the husband and It is precisely in such situations when a minor
wife, possibly result in bitter animosity, and parent needs the comfort, care, advice, and
endanger the marriage and the family, all for guidance of her own parents. The State cannot
the sake of reducing the population. This replace her natural mother and father when it
would be a marked departure from the policy comes to providing her needs and comfort. To
of the State to protect marriage as an say that their consent is no longer relevant is
inviolable social institution. Decision-making clearly anti- family. It does not promote unity
involving a reproductive health procedure is a in the family. It is an affront to the
private matter which belongs to the couple, constitutional mandate to protect and
not just one of them. Any decision they would strengthen the family as an inviolable social
reach would affect their future as a family institution.
because the size of the family or the number of
their children significantly matters. The More alarmingly, it disregards and disobeys
decision whether or not to undergo the the constitutional mandate that “the natural
procedure belongs exclusively to, and shared and primary right and duty of parents in the
by, both spouses as one cohesive unit as they rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and the
chart their own destiny. It is a constitutionally development of moral character shall receive
guaranteed private right. Unless it prejudices the support of the Government.” In this
the State, which has not shown any regard, Commissioner Bernas wrote:
compelling interest, the State should see to it
that they chart their destiny together as one The 1987 provision has added the adjective
family. “primary” to modify the right of parents. It
imports the assertion that the right of parents
The Family and Parental Consent is superior to that of the State. [Emphases
supplied]
Equally deplorable is the debarment of
parental consent in cases where the minor, To insist on a rule that interferes with the
who will be undergoing a procedure, is already right of parents to exercise parental control
a parent or has had a miscarriage. over their minor-child or the right of the
spouses to mutually decide on matters which
Section 7 of the RH law provides: very well affect the very purpose of marriage,
that is, the establishment of conjugal and
SEC. 7. Access to Family Planning.—x x x. family life, would result in the violation of
one’s privacy with respect to his family. It
No person shall be denied information and would be dismissive of the unique and
access to family planning services, whether strongly-held Filipino tradition of maintaining
natural or artificial: Provided, That minors close family ties and violative of the
will not be allowed access to modern methods recognition that the State affords couples
of family planning without written consent entering into the special contract of marriage
from their parents or guardian/s except when to as one unit in forming the foundation of the
the minor is already a parent or has had a family and society.
miscarriage.
The State cannot, without a compelling state
There can be no other interpretation of this interest, take over the role of parents in the
provision except that when a minor is already care and custody of a minor child, whether or
a parent or has had a miscarriage, the parents not the latter is already a parent or has had a
are excluded from the decision-making process miscarriage. Only a compelling state interest
of the minor with regard to family planning.
can justify a state substitution of their In this connection, the second sentence of
parental authority. Section 23(a)(2)(ii) should be struck down. By
effectively limiting the requirement of
First Exception: Access to Information parental consent to “only in elective surgical
procedures,” it denies the parents their right
Whether with respect to the minor referred to of parental authority in cases where what is
under the exception provided in the second involved are “non-surgical procedures.” Save
paragraph of Section 7 or with respect to the for the two exceptions discussed above, and in
consenting spouse under Section 23(a)(2)(i), a the case of an abused child as provided in the
distinction must be made. There must be a first sentence of Section 23(a)(2)(ii), the
differentiation between access to information parents should not be deprived of their
about family planning services, on one hand, constitutional right of parental authority. To
and access to the reproductive health deny them of this right would be an affront to
procedures and modern family planning the constitutional mandate to protect and
methods themselves, on the other. Insofar as strengthen the family.
access to information is concerned, the Court
finds no constitutional objection to the 5. No.
acquisition of information by the minor At this point, suffice it to state that any attack
referred to under the exception in the second on the validity of Section 14 of the RH Law is
paragraph of Section 7 that would enable her premature because the Department of
to take proper care of her own body and that Education, Culture and Sports has yet to
of her unborn child. formulate a curriculum on age -appropriate
reproductive health education. One can only
After all, Section 12, Article II of the speculate on the content, manner and medium
Constitution mandates the State to protect of instruction that will be used to educate the
both the life of the mother as that of the adolescents and whether they will contradict
unborn child. Considering that information to the religious beliefs of the petitioners and
enable a person to make informed decisions is validate their apprehensions. Thus,
essential in the protection and maintenance of considering the premature nature of this
ones’ health, access to such information with particular issue, the Court declines to rule on
respect to reproductive health must be its constitutionality or validity.
allowed. In this situation, the fear that
parents might be deprived of their parental At any rate, Section 12, Article II of the 1987
control is unfounded because they are not Constitution provides that the natural and
prohibited to exercise parental guidance and primary right and duty of parents in the
control over their minor child and assist her in rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and
deciding whether to accept or reject the development of moral character shall receive
information received. the support of the Government. Like the 1973
Constitution and the 1935 Constitution, the
Second Exception: Life Threatening Cases 1987 Constitution affirms the State
recognition of the invaluable role of parents in
As in the case of the conscientious objector, an preparing the youth to become productive
exception must be made in life-threatening members of society. Notably, it places more
cases that require the performance of importance on the role of parents in the
emergency procedures. In such cases, the life development of their children by recognizing
of the minor who has already suffered a that said role shall be “primary,” that is, that
miscarriage and that of the spouse should not the right of parents in upbringing the youth is
be put at grave risk simply for lack of consent. superior to that of the State.
It should be emphasized that no person should
be denied the appropriate medical care It is also the inherent right of the State to act
urgently needed to preserve the primordial as parens patriae to aid parents in the moral
right, that is, the right to life. development of the youth. Indeed, the
Constitution makes mention of the importance
of developing the youth and their important process for failure to accord persons,
role in nation building. Considering that especially the parties targeted by it, fair notice
Section 14 provides not only for the age- of the conduct to avoid; and (2) it leaves law
appropriate-reproductive health education, enforcers unbridled discretion in carrying out
but also for values formation; the development its provisions and becomes an arbitrary
of knowledge and skills in self-protection flexing of the Government muscle. Moreover,
against discrimination; sexual abuse and in determining whether the words used in a
violence against women and children and statute are vague, words must not only be
other forms of gender based violence and teen taken in accordance with their plain meaning
pregnancy; physical, social and emotional alone, but also in relation to other parts of the
changes in adolescents; women’s rights and statute. It is a rule that every part of the
children’s rights; responsible teenage statute must be interpreted with reference to
behavior; gender and development; and the context, that is, every part of it must be
responsible parenthood, and that Rule 10, construed together with the other parts and
Section 11.01 of the RH-IRR and Section 4(t) kept subservient to the general intent of the
of the RH Law itself provides for the teaching whole enactment.
of responsible teenage behavior, gender
sensitivity and physical and emotional Further, the use of the term “private health
changes among adolescents — the Court finds care institution” in Section 7 of the law,
that the legal mandate provided under the instead of “private health care service
assailed provision supplements, rather than provider,” should not be a cause of confusion
supplants, the rights and duties of the parents for the obvious reason that they are used
in the moral development of their children. synonymously.
Furthermore, as Section 14 also mandates The Court need not belabor the issue of
that the mandatory reproductive health whether the right to be exempt from being
education program shall be developed in obligated to render reproductive health
conjunction with parent-teacher-community service and modern family planning methods,
associations, school officials and other interest includes exemption from being obligated to
groups, it could very well be said that it will give reproductive health information and to
be in line with the religious beliefs of the render reproductive health procedures.
petitioners. By imposing such a condition, it Clearly, subject to the qualifications and
becomes apparent that the petitioners’ exemptions earlier discussed, the right to be
contention that Section 14 violates Article XV, exempt from being obligated to render
Section 3(1) of the Constitution is without reproductive health service and modern
merit. family planning methods, necessarily includes
exemption from being obligated to give
While the Court notes the possibility that reproductive health information and to render
educators might raise their objection to their reproductive health procedures. The terms
participation in the reproductive health “service” and “methods” are broad enough to
education program provided under Section 14 include the providing of information and the
of the RH Law on the ground that the same rendering of medical procedures.
violates their religious beliefs, the Court
reserves its judgment should an actual case be The same can be said with respect to the
filed before it. contention that the RH Law punishes health
care service providers who intentionally
6. No. withhold, restrict and provide incorrect
A statute or act suffers from the defect of information regarding reproductive health
vagueness when it lacks comprehensible programs and services. For ready reference,
standards that men of common intelligence the assailed provision is hereby quoted as
must necessarily guess its meaning and differ follows:
as to its application. It is repugnant to the
Constitution in two respects: (1) it violates due
SEC. 23. Prohibited Acts.—The following acts health development which shall endeavor to
are prohibited: make essential goods, health and other social
services available to all the people at
(a) Any health care service provider, whether affordable cost. There shall be priority for the
public or private, who shall: needs of the underprivileged, sick, elderly,
disabled, women, and children. The State
(1) Knowingly withhold information or restrict shall endeavor to provide free medical care to
the dissemination thereof, and/or intentionally paupers.
provide incorrect information regarding
programs and services on reproductive health It should be noted that Section 7 of the RH
including the right to informed choice and Law prioritizes poor and marginalized couples
access to a full range of legal, medically-safe, who are suffering from fertility issues and
non-abortifacient and effective family desire to have children. There is, therefore, no
planning methods; merit to the contention that the RH Law only
seeks to target the poor to reduce their
From its plain meaning, the word “incorrect” number. While the RH Law admits the use of
here denotes failing to agree with a copy or contraceptives, it does not, as elucidated
model or with established rules; inaccurate, above, sanction abortion. As Section 3(l)
faulty; failing to agree with the requirements explains, the “promotion and/or stabilization
of duty, morality or propriety; and failing to of the population growth rate is incidental to
coincide with the truth. On the other hand, the advancement of reproductive health.”
the word “knowingly” means with awareness
or deliberateness that is intentional. Used Moreover, the RH Law does not prescribe the
together in relation to Section 23(a)(1), they number of children a couple may have and
connote a sense of malice and ill motive to does not impose conditions upon couples who
mislead or misrepresent the public as to the intend to have children. While the petitioners
nature and effect of programs and services on surmise that the assailed law seeks to charge
reproductive health. Public health and safety couples with the duty to have children only if
demand that health care service providers they would raise them in a truly humane way,
give their honest and correct medical a deeper look into its provisions shows that
information in accordance with what is what the law seeks to do is to simply provide
acceptable in medical practice. While health priority to the poor in the implementation of
care service providers are not barred from government programs to promote basic
expressing their own personal opinions reproductive health care.
regarding the programs and services on
reproductive health, their right must be With respect to the exclusion of private
tempered with the need to provide public educational institutions from the mandatory
health and safety. The public deserves no less. reproductive health education program under
Section 14, suffice it to state that the mere
7. No. fact that the children of those who are less
To provide that the poor are to be given fortunate attend public educational
priority in the government’s reproductive institutions does not amount to substantial
health care program is not a violation of the distinction sufficient to annul the assailed
equal protection clause. In fact, it is pursuant provision. On the other hand, substantial
to Section 11, Article XIII of the Constitution distinction rests between public educational
which recognizes the distinct necessity to institutions and private educational
address the needs of the underprivileged by institutions, particularly because there is a
providing that they be given priority in need to recognize the academic freedom of
addressing the health development of the private educational institutions especially
people. Thus: with respect to religious instruction and to
consider their sensitivity towards the teaching
Section 11. The State shall adopt an of reproductive health education.
integrated and comprehensive approach to
Consistent with what the Court had earlier “(e) To issue certificates of compliance with
discussed, however, it should be emphasized technical requirements to serve as basis for
that conscientious objectors are exempt from the issuance of appropriate authorization and
this provision as long as their religious beliefs spot-check for compliance with regulations
and convictions do not allow them to render regarding operation of manufacturers,
reproductive health service, pro bono or importers, exporters, distributors,
otherwise. wholesalers, drug outlets, and other
establishments and facilities of health
9. No. products, as determined by the FDA;
(b) Such basic services and facilities include, national priority programs which the local
but are not limited to, x x x. government is called upon to implement like
the RH Law.
While the aforementioned provision charges
the LGUs to take on the functions and Moreover, from the use of the word
responsibilities that have already been “endeavor,” the LGUs are merely encouraged
devolved upon them from the national to provide these services. There is nothing in
agencies on the aspect of providing for basic the wording of the law which can be construed
services and facilities in their respective as making the availability of these services
jurisdictions, paragraph (c) of the same mandatory for the LGUs. For said reason, it
provision provides a categorical exception of cannot be said that the RH Law amounts to
cases involving nationally -funded projects, an undue encroachment by the national
facilities, programs and services. Thus: government upon the autonomy enjoyed by
the local governments.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of
subsection (b) hereof, public works and The ARMM
infrastructure projects and other facilities,
programs and services funded by the National The fact that the RH Law does not intrude in
Government under the annual General the autonomy of local governments can be
Appropriations Act, other special laws, equally applied to the ARMM. The RH Law
pertinent executive orders, and those wholly does not infringe upon its autonomy.
or partially funded from foreign sources, are Moreover, Article III, Sections 6, 10 and 11 of
not covered under this Section, except in those R.A. No. 9054, or the organic act of the
cases where the local government unit ARMM, alluded to by petitioner Tillah to
concerned is duly designated as the justify the exemption of the operation of the
implementing agency for such projects, RH Law in the autonomous region, refer to
facilities, programs and services. [Emphases the policy statements for the guidance of the
supplied] regional government. These provisions relied
upon by the petitioners simply delineate the
The essence of this express reservation of powers that may be exercised by the regional
power by the national government is that, government, which can, in no manner, be
unless an LGU is particularly designated as characterized as an abdication by the State of
the implementing agency, it has no power over its power to enact legislation that would
a program for which funding has been benefit the general welfare. After all, despite
provided by the national government under the veritable autonomy granted the ARMM,
the annual general appropriations act, even if the Constitution and the supporting
the program involves the delivery of basic jurisprudence, as they now stand, reject the
services within the jurisdiction of the LGU. A notion of imperium et imperio in the
complete relinquishment of central relationship between the national and the
government powers on the matter of providing regional governments. Except for the express
basic facilities and services cannot be implied and implied limitations imposed on it by the
as the Local Government Code itself weighs Constitution, Congress cannot be restricted to
against it. exercise its inherent and plenary power to
legislate on all subjects which extends to all
In this case, a reading of the RH Law clearly matters of general concern or common
shows that whether it pertains to the interest.
establishment of health care facilities, the
hiring of skilled health professionals, or the Provisions declared unconstitutional in this
training of barangay health workers, it will be case:
the national government that will provide for
the funding of its implementation. Local 1] Section 7 and the corresponding provision
autonomy is not absolute. The national in the RH-IRR insofar as they: a) require
government still has the say when it comes to private health facilities and non-maternity
specialty hospitals and hospitals owned and 7] Section 17 and the corresponding provision
operated by a religious group to refer patients, in the RH-IRR regarding the rendering of pro
not in an emergency or life-threatening case, bono reproductive health service insofar as
as defined under Republic Act No. 8344, to they affect the conscientious objector in
another health facility which is conveniently securing PhilHealth accreditation; and
accessible; and b) allow minor-parents or
minors who have suffered a miscarriage 8] Section 3.01(a) and Section 3.01(j) of the
access to modern methods of family planning RH-IRR, which added the qualifier “primarily”
without written consent from their parents or in defining abortifacients and contraceptives,
guardian/s; as they are ultra vires and, therefore, null and
void for contravening Section 4(a) of the RH
2] Section 23(a)(1) and the corresponding Law and violating Section 12, Article II of the
provision in the RH-IRR, particularly Section Constitution.
5.24 thereof, insofar as they punish any
healthcare service provider who fails and or c. Natural and primary right and duty of
refuses to disseminate information regarding parents
programs and services on reproductive health
regardless of his or her religious beliefs;
4. Communication and information in
3] Section 23(a)(2)(i) and the corresponding
nation building (Article II, Section 24)
provision in the RH-IRR insofar as they allow
a married individual, not in an emergency or Section 24. The State recognizes the
life -threatening case, as defined under vital role of communication and
Republic Act No. 8344, to undergo information in nation-building.
reproductive health procedures without the
consent of the spouse; (Article XVI, Sections 10—11)
4] Section 23(a)(2)(ii) and the corresponding Section 10. The State shall provide the
provision in the RH-IRR insofar as they limit
policy environment for the full
the requirement of parental consent only to
elective surgical procedures;
development of Filipino capability and the
emergence of communication
5] Section 23(a)(3) and the corresponding structures suitable to the needs and
provision in the RH-IRR, particularly Section aspirations of the nation and the balanced
5.24 thereof, insofar as they punish any flow of information into, out of, and across
healthcare service provider who fails and/or the country, in accordance with a policy
refuses to refer a patient not in an emergency that respects the freedom of speech and of
or life-threatening case, as defined under the press.
Republic Act No. 8344, to another health care
service provider within the same facility or
Section 11. (1) The ownership and
one which is conveniently accessible
regardless of his or her religious beliefs; management of mass media shall be
limited to citizens of the Philippines, or to
6] Section 23(b) and the corresponding corporations, cooperatives or associations,
provision in the RH-IRR, particularly Section wholly-owned and managed by such
5.24 thereof, insofar as they punish any public citizens.
officer who refuses to support reproductive
health programs or shall do any act that The Congress shall regulate or prohibit
hinders the full implementation of a monopolies in commercial mass media
reproductive health program, regardless of his when the public interest so requires. No
or her religious beliefs;
combinations in restraint of trade or
unfair competition therein shall be
allowed.
- RA 3019 – Anti Graft and Corrupt Section 21. Foreign loans may only be
Practices Act incurred in accordance with law and
the regulation of the monetary
Section 1. Statement of policy. It is the authority. Information on foreign
policy of the Philippine Government, in loans obtained or guaranteed by the
line with the principle that a public office Government shall be made available to
is a public trust, to repress certain acts of the public.
public officers and private persons alike
which constitute graft or corrupt practices g.Contracts with foreign groups(Article
or which may lead thereto. XII, Section 2 [5])
involving the then Regions IX and XII which autonomous government becomes accountable
were later formed as ARMM. Limbona then not to the central authorities but to its
informed their assembly that they will have constituency.
no session during his engagement in the
House. While away for an event at the House, But the question of whether or not the grant
the assembly convened against his orders, of autonomy Muslim Mindanao under the
declaring the seat of speaker vacant and later 1987 Constitution involves, truly, an effort to
elected Conte Mangelin as the new speaker. decentralize power rather than mere
Limbona questioned his removal from his administration is a question foreign to this
speakership and later on as member of the petition, since what is involved herein is a
Sangguniang Pampook. local government unit constituted prior to the
ratification of the present Constitution.
Issue: Hence, the Court will not resolve that
Whether or not the grant of autonomy Muslim controversy now, in this case, since no
Mindanao under the 1987 Constitution controversy in fact exists. We will resolve it at
involves, truly, an effort to decentralize power the proper time and in the proper case.
rather than mere administration.
Under the 1987 Constitution, local
Held: government units enjoy autonomy in these
No. two senses, thus:
Now, autonomy is either decentralization of
administration or decentralization of power. Section 1. The territorial and political
There is decentralization of subdivisions of the Republic of the Philippines
administration when the central are the provinces, cities, municipalities, and
government delegates administrative barangays. Here shall be autonomous regions
powers to political subdivisions in order in Muslim Mindanao ,and the Cordilleras as
to broaden the base of government hereinafter provided. 29
power and in the process to make local
governments "more responsive and Sec. 2. The territorial and political
accountable," "and ensure their fullest subdivisions shall enjoy local autonomy. 30
development as self-reliant communities
and make them more effective partners xxx xxx xxx
in the pursuit of national development
and social progress." At the same time, it See. 15. Mere shall be created autonomous
relieves the central government of the burden regions in Muslim Mindanao and in the
of managing local affairs and enables it to Cordilleras consisting of provinces, cities,
concentrate on national concerns. The municipalities, and geographical areas
President exercises "general supervision" over sharing common and distinctive historical and
them, but only to "ensure that local affairs are cultural heritage, economic and social
administered according to law." He has no structures, and other relevant characteristics
control over their acts in the sense that he can within the framework of this Constitution and
substitute their judgments with his own. the national sovereignty as well as territorial
integrity of the Republic of the Philippines.
Decentralization of power, on the other
hand, involves an abdication of political An autonomous government that enjoys
power in the favor of local governments autonomy of the latter category [CONST.
units declare to be autonomous. In that (1987), art. X, sec. 15.] is subject alone to the
case, the autonomous government is free to decree of the organic act creating it and
chart its own destiny and shape its future accepted principles on the effects and limits of
with minimum intervention from central "autonomy." On the other hand, an
authorities. According to a constitutional autonomous government of the former class is,
author, decentralization of power amounts to as we noted, under the supervision of the
"self-immolation," since in that event, the national government acting through the
President (and the Department of Local (8) Establishment, operation and maintenance
Government). If the Sangguniang Pampook (of of health, welfare and other social services,
Region XII), then, is autonomous in the latter programs and facilities;
sense, its acts are, debatably beyond the
domain of this Court in perhaps the same way (9) Preservation and development of customs,
that the internal acts, say, of the Congress of traditions, languages and culture indigenous
the Philippines are beyond our jurisdiction. to the Autonomous Region; and
But if it is autonomous in the former category
only, it comes unarguably under our (10) Such other matters as may be authorized
jurisdiction. An examination of the very by law, including the enactment of such
Presidential Decree creating the autonomous measures as may be necessary for the
governments of Mindanao persuades us that promotion of the general welfare of the people
they were never meant to exercise autonomy in the Autonomous Region.
in the second sense, that is, in which the
central government commits an act of self- The President shall exercise such powers as
immolation. Presidential Decree No. 1618, in may be necessary to assure that enactment
the first place, mandates that "[t]he President and acts of the Sangguniang Pampook and the
shall have the power of general supervision Lupong Tagapagpaganap ng Pook are in
and control over Autonomous Regions." In the compliance with this Decree, national
second place, the Sangguniang Pampook, their legislation, policies, plans and programs.
legislative arm, is made to discharge chiefly
administrative services, thus: The Sangguniang Pampook shall maintain
liaison with the Batasang Pambansa.
SEC. 7. Powers of the Sangguniang Pampook.
The Sangguniang Pampook shall exercise Hence, we assume jurisdiction. And if we can
local legislative powers over regional affairs make an inquiry in the validity of the
within the framework of national development expulsion in question, with more reason can
plans, policies and goals, in the following we review the petitioner's removal as Speaker.
areas:
b. Devolution(Section 17, RA 7160, Local
(1) Organization of regional administrative Government Code of 1991)
system;
Section 17. Basic Services and Facilities. -
(2) Economic, social and cultural development
of the Autonomous Region;
(a) Local government units shall endeavor
(3) Agricultural, commercial and industrial to be self-reliant and shall continue
programs for the Autonomous Region; exercising the powers and discharging the
duties and functions currently vested
(4) Infrastructure development for the upon them. They shall also discharge
Autonomous Region; the functions and responsibilities of
national agencies and offices
(5) Urban and rural planning for the devolved to them pursuant to this Code.
Autonomous Region;
Local government units shall likewise
(6) Taxation and other revenue-raising exercise such other powers and discharge
measures as provided for in this Decree; such other functions and responsibilities
as are necessary, appropriate, or
(7) Maintenance, operation and incidental to efficient and effective
administration of schools established by the provisions of the basic services and
Autonomous Region; facilities enumerated herein.
(b) xxx
the date of the last publication of the Court, no appeal has been filed, or if, upon
notice. The clerk shall, as soon as appeal, the decision of the court has been
possible, forward copies of the petition, confirmed by the Supreme Court, and the
the sentence, the naturalization said decision has become final, the clerk of
certificate, and other pertinent data to the the court which heard the petition shall
Department of the Interior (now issue to the petitioner a naturalization
Department of Interior and Local certificate which shall, among other
Government), the Bureau of Justice (now things, state the following: The file
Department of Justice), the Provincial number of the petition, the number of the
Inspector of the Philippine Constabulary naturalization certificate, the signature of
of the province (Head of a Provincial the person naturalized affixed in the
Office of the Philippine National Police) presence of the clerk of the court, the
and the justice of the peace (judge of a personal circumstances of the person
Municipal Trial Court or Metropolitan naturalized, the dates on which his
Trial Court) of the municipality wherein declaration of intention and petition were
the petitioner resides. filed, the date of the decision granting the
petition, and the name of the judge who
Section 10. Hearing of the petition.—No rendered the decision. A photograph of
petition shall be heard within the thirty the petitioner with the dry seal affixed
days preceding any election. The hearing thereto of the court which granted the
shall be public, and the Solicitor-General, petition, must be affixed to the certificate.
either himself or through his delegate or
the provincial fiscal concerned, shall Before the naturalization certificate is
appear on behalf of the Commonwealth issued, the petitioner shall, in open court,
(now Republic) of the Philippines at all take the following oath:
the proceedings and at the hearing. If,
after the hearing, the court believes, in "I, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
view of the evidence taken, that the . . , solemnly swear that I renounce
petitioner has all the qualifications absolutely and forever all allegiance and
required by, and none of the fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate,
disqualifications specified in this Act and state or sovereignty, and particularly to
has complied with all requisites herein the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of which at this
established, it shall order the proper time I am a subject or citizen; that I will
naturalization certificate to be issued and support and defend the Constitution of
the registration of the said naturalization the Philippines and that I will obey the
certificate in the proper civil registry as laws, legal orders and decrees
required in section ten of Act Numbered promulgated by the duly constituted
Three thousand seven hundred and fifty- authorities of the Commonwealth
three. (Republic) of the Philippines; [and I
hereby declare that I recognize and accept
Section 11. Appeal.—The final sentence the supreme authority of the United
may, at the instance of either of the States of America in the Philippines] and
parties, be appealed to the Supreme will maintain true faith and allegiance
Court. thereto; and that I impose this obligation
upon myself voluntarily without mental
Section 12. Issuance of the Certificate of reservation or purpose of evasion.
Naturalization.—If, after the lapse of
thirty days from and after the date on "So help me God."
which the parties were notified of the
Section 15. Effect of the naturalization on be admitted to citizenship has borne any
wife and children. - Any woman who is hereditary title, or has been of any of the
now or may hereafter be married to a orders of nobility in the kingdom or state
citizen of the Philippines, and who might from which he came, he shall, in addition
herself be lawfully naturalized shall be to the above requisites, make an express
deemed a citizen of the Philippines. renunciation of his title or order of
nobility in the court to which his
Minor children of persons naturalized application is made, and his renunciation-
under this law who have been born in-the shall be recorded in the court, unless with
Philippines shall be considered citizens the express consent of the National
thereof. Assembly.
privileges of a citizen. Under current and which it can be inferred that C.A. No. 473 was
existing laws, there are three ways by which intended to be amended or repealed by R.A.
an alien may become a citizen by No. 9139. What the legislature had in mind
naturalization: (a) administrative was merely to prescribe another mode of
naturalization pursuant to R.A. No. 9139; (b) acquiring Philippine citizenship which may be
judicial naturalization pursuant to C.A. No. availed of by native born aliens. The only
473, as amended; and (c) legislative implication is that, a native born alien has the
naturalization in the form of a law enacted by choice to apply for judicial or administrative
Congress bestowing Philippine citizenship to naturalization, subject to the prescribed
an alien. qualifications and disqualifications.
Petitioner’s contention that the qualifications In the instant case, petitioner applied for
an applicant for naturalization should possess naturalization by judicial act, though at the
are those provided for in R.A. No. 9139 and time of the filing of his petition,
not those set forth in C.A. No. 473 is barren of administrative naturalization under R.A. No.
merit. The qualifications and disqualifications 9139 was already available. Consequently, his
of an applicant for naturalization by judicial application should be governed by C.A. No.
act are set forth in Sections 2 and 4 of C.A. 473.
No. 473. On the other hand, Sections 3 and 4
of R.A. No. 9139 provide for the qualifications Second. If the qualifications prescribed in R.A.
and disqualifications of an applicant for No. 9139 would be made applicable even to
naturalization by administrative act. judicial naturalization, the coverage of the law
would be broadened since it would then apply
Indeed, R.A. No. 9139 was enacted as a even to aliens who are not native born. It
remedial measure intended to make the must be stressed that R.A. No. 9139 applies
process of acquiring Philippine citizenship less only to aliens who were born in the
tedious, less technical and more encouraging. Philippines and have been residing here.
It likewise addresses the concerns of degree
holders who, by reason of lack of citizenship Third. Applying the provisions of R.A. No.
requirement, cannot practice their profession, 9139 to judicial naturalization is contrary to
thus promoting “brain gain” for the the intention of the legislature to liberalize
Philippines. These however, do not justify the naturalization procedure in the country.
petitioner’s contention that the qualifications One of the qualifications set forth in R.A. No.
set forth in said law apply even to applications 9139 is that the applicant was born in the
for naturalization by judicial act. Philippines and should have been residing
herein since birth. Thus, one who was born
First. C.A. No. 473 and R.A. No. 9139 are here but left the country, though resided for
separate and distinct laws—the former covers more than ten (10) years from the filing of the
all aliens regardless of class while the latter application is also disqualified. On the other
covers native-born aliens who lived here in the hand, if we maintain the distinct
Philippines all their lives, who never saw any qualifications under each of the two laws, an
other country and all along thought that they alien who is not qualified under R.A. No. 9139
were Filipinos; who have demonstrated love may still be naturalized under C.A. No. 473.
and loyalty to the Philippines and affinity to
the customs and traditions. To reiterate, the Thus, absent a specific provision expressly
intention of the legislature in enacting R.A. amending C.A. No. 473, the law stands and
No. 9139 was to make the process of acquiring the qualifications and disqualifications set
Philippine citizenship less tedious, less forth therein are maintained.
technical and more encouraging which is
administrative rather than judicial in nature. In any event, petitioner failed to prove that
Thus, although the legislature believes that the witnesses he presented were competent to
there is a need to liberalize the naturalization vouch for his good moral character, and are
law of the Philippines, there is nothing from themselves possessed of good moral character.
not petitioner has any derogatory record follows: Fifty thousand pesos (P50,000.00)
on file or any such relevant and material upon the approval of the petition and
information which might be adverse to Fifty thousand pesos (P50,000.00) upon
petitioner's application for citizenship. the taking of the oath of allegiance to the
Republic of the Philippines, forthwith, a
If the petition is found by the Committee certificate of naturalization shall be
to be wanting in substance and form, the issued. Within sixty (60) days from the
petition shall be dismissed without issuance of the certificate, the petitioner
prejudice. shall take an oath of allegiance in the
proper forum upon proof of payment of the
Section 8. Approval or Disapproval of the required naturalization processing fee and
Petition. - Within sixty (60) days from certificate of naturalization. Should the
receipt of the report of the agencies which applicant fail to take the abovementioned
were furnished a copy of the petition or oath of allegiance within said period of
the date of the last publication of the time, the approval of the petition shall be
petition, whichever comes in later, the deemed abandoned.
Committee shall consider and review all
relevant and material information it has - Legislative naturalization
received pertaining to the petition, and
may, for the purpose call the petitioner for Naturalization made through a legislative
interview to ascertain his/her identity, the act.
authenticity of the petition and its
annexes, and to determine the - Special naturalization laws
truthfulness of the statements and
declarations made in the petition and its Laws of naturalization with special
annexes. provisions on how citizenship is acquired
by any foreign national covered by the
If the Committee shall have received any said law.
information adverse to the petition, the
Committee shall allow the petitioner to - Mass naturalization law; Philippine Bill
answer, explain or refute the information. of 1902
- General law of naturalization; LOI 270 (1) Having honorably held office under
(1978) the Government of the Philippines or
under that of any of the provinces, cities,
LETTER OF INSTRUCTION NO. 270 municipalities or political subdivisions
thereof;
TO: Solicitor General
Undersecretary of Foreign Affairs (2) Having established a new industry or
Director General, NISA introduced a useful invention in the
Philippines;
SUBJECT: Naturalization of deserving
aliens by decree (3) Being married to a Filipino;
In order that aliens permanently residing (4) Having been engaged as a teacher in
in this country who, having developed and the Philippines in a public or recognized
demonstrated love for and loyalty to the private school not established for the
Philippines and affinity to the customs, exclusive instruction of children of
traditions and ideals of the Filipino persons of a particular nationality or race,
people, as well as contributed to the in any of the branches of education of
economic, social and cultural development industry for a period of not less than two
of our country, may be integrated into the years;
national fabric by the grant of Philippine
citizenship, you are hereby directed as (5) Having been born in the Philippines.
follows?
d. He must be of good moral character and
1. That you shall constitute yourselves as believes in the principles underlying the
a Committee, with the Solicitor General Philippine Constitution, and must have
as Chairman, to receive, and consider and conducted himself in a proper and
submit recommendations on, applications irreproachable manner during the entire
for naturalization by decree from aliens period of his residence in the Philippines
with the following qualifications and none in his relation with the constituted
of the following disqualifications: government as well as with the
community in which he is living;
Qualifications:
e. He must have a known trade, business,
a. He must not be less than 21 years of profession, or lawful occupation, from
age on the date of the filing of his petition; which he derives income sufficient for his
support and, if he is married or has
b. If born in a foreign country, he must dependents, also that of his family;
have been legally admitted into the
Philippines either as an immigrant or a f. He must be able to speak and write
non-immigrant; Pilipino; or English or Spanish, and any of
the principal Philippine languages;
c. He must have had a continuous
residence in the Philippines of ten years, g. He must have enrolled his minor
which period shall be reduced to five children of school age in any of the public
years for applicants with any of the or private schools recognized by the
following special qualifications: Department of Education and Culture,
where Philippine history, government and
civics are taught or prescribed as part of
the school curriculum, during the period photographs and certified true or xerox
of residence in the Philippines required of copies of his certificate of arrival (if any),
him prior to the filing of his petition his Alien Certificate of Registration and
hereunder; and his Immigrant Certificate of Residence,
and supported by the separate affidavits
h. He must have, during the period of his of two credible witnesses stating that they
residence in the Philippines, mingled have personally known the petitioner for
socially with the Filipinos and evinced a the period of time required under
sincere desire to learn and embrace the paragraph 1 hereof, that petitioner is a
customs, traditions and ideals of the person of good repute and morally
Filipino people. irreproachable, and that said petitioner
has, in their opinion, all the qualifications
Disqualifications: necessary to become a citizen of the
Philippines and is not in any way
a. He must not be opposed to organized disqualified under the provisions of this
government or affiliated with any Decree.
association or group of persons who
uphold and teach doctrines opposing all 3. That the application shall be filed with
organized governments; the Committee not later than ___________,
1975.
b. He must not defend or teach the
necessity or propriety of violence, personal 4. That on the basis of the data available
assault, or assassination for the success to the Committee, the Committee shall
and predominance of his ideas; submit appropriate recommendations to
me not later than May 15, 1975 as to who,
c. He must not be a polygamist or a among the aforesaid applicants, are
believer in the practice of polygamy; eligible and qualified for naturalization by
decree: however, the names and data
d. He must not have been convicted of any pertaining to those aliens previously
crime involving moral turpitude; screened by the Department of National
Defense and the NISA and found
e. He is not suffering from mental appropriate for naturalization by decree
alienation or any incurable contagious shall be forwarded to me without need of
disease. prior screening by the Committee; and
Cases of aliens born of Filipino mothers; 5. You are authorized to promulgate rules
If, however, the applicant was born of a and regulations and prescribe appropriate
Filipino mother before the effectivity of forms and the required fees for the
the new Constitution and has resided effective and expeditious implementation
continuously in the Philippines since of these instructions.
birth, he shall be considered qualified
hereunder without need of any further Done in the City of Manila, this 11th day
qualification, provided he does not suffer of April, in the year of Our Lord, nineteen
from the disqualifications above hundred and seventy-five.
enumerated.
b. Derivative naturalization
2. That the application shall be in
triplicate, signed and verified by the - wife, minor children. Alien woman upon
petitioner himself and accompanied by his marrying a Filipino
Section 4. Citizens of the Philippines Section 1. Any person who, being a citizen
who marry aliens shall retain their of the Philippines on December eight,
citizenship, unless by their act or nineteen hundred forty-one, had lost said
omission, they are deemed, under the law, citizenship by rendering service to, or
to have renounced it. accepting commission in, the armed forces
of an allied foreign country, and taking an
- by taking an oath of allegiance to a oath of allegiance incident thereto, may
foreign country reacquire Philippine citizenship by taking
an oath of allegiance to the Republic of
Exception: Doctrine of Indelible the Philippines and registering the same
Allegiance with the Local Civil Registry in the place
where he resides or last resided in the
The doctrine that an individual may be Philippines within one year from the date
compelled to retain his original of the approval of this Act. The said oath
nationality notwithstanding that he has of allegiance shall contain, in addition, a
already renounced or forfeited it under renunciation of any other citizenship.
the laws of the second state whose
nationality he has acquired. c. Republic Act No. 2630 (1960) (deserted
US Armed Forces)
E. Modes of reacquiring citizenship
Section 1. Any person who had lost his
1. by naturalization Philippine citizenship by rendering
service to, or accepting commission in, the
2. by repatriation Armed Forces of the United States, or
after separation from the Armed Forces of
a. Commonwealth Act No. 63 (deserted the United States, acquired United States
AFP) citizenship, may reacquire Philippine
citizenship by taking an oath of allegiance
Section. 2. How citizenship may be to the Republic of the Philippines and
reacquired. – Citizenship may be registering the same with the Local Civil
reacquired: Registry in the place where he resides or
last resided in the Philippines. The said
(1) xxx oath of allegiance shall contain a
renunciation of any other citizenship.
(2) By repatriation of deserters of the
Army, Navy or Air d. Presidential Decree No. 725 (natural
Corp: Provided, That a woman who lost born Filipinos who lost citizenship)
her citizenship by reason of her marriage
to an alien may be repatriated in PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 725
accordance with the provisions of this Act
after the termination of the marital PROVIDING FOR REPATRIATION OF
status; and FILIPINO WOMEN WHO HAD LOST
THEIR PHILIPPINE CITIZENSHIP BY
(3) xxx MARRIAGE TO ALIENS AND OF
NATURAL BORN FILIPINOS
b. Republic Act No. 965 (1963) (served
Allied Forces in World War II) WHEREAS, there are many Filipino
women who had lost their Philippine
Citizenship by marriage to aliens;
registration in the proper civil registry absolutely and forever all allegiance and
and in the Bureau or Immigration. The fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate,
Bureau of Immigration shall thereupon state or sovereignty, and particularly to
cancel the pertinent alien certificate of the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of which at this
registration and issue the certificate of time I am a subject or citizen; that I will
identification as Filipino citizen to the support and defend the Constitution of
repatriated citizen. the Philippines and that I will obey the
laws, legal orders and decrees
f. Republic Act No. 9225 (September 17, promulgated by the duly constituted
2003) (Citizenship Retention and authorities of the Commonwealth15of the
Acquisition Act of 2003) Philippines; [and I hereby declare that I
recognize and accept the supreme
- Effect of acquisition of foreign authority of the United States of America
citizenship before RA 9225 in the Philippines and will maintain true
faith and allegiance thereto;16 and that I
(Section 12, Commonwealth Act No. 473) impose this obligation upon myself
voluntarily without mental reservation or
Section 12. Issuance of the Certificate of purpose of evasion.
Naturalization.—If, after the lapse of
thirty days from and after the date on "So help me God."
which the parties were notified of the
Court, no appeal has been filed, or if, upon - Effect of acquisition of foreign
appeal, the decision of the court has been citizenship under RA 9225
confirmed by the Supreme Court,14 and
the said decision has become final, the Section 3. Retention of Philippine
clerk of the court which heard the petition Citizenship - Any provision of law to the
shall issue to the petitioner a contrary notwithstanding, natural-born
naturalization certificate which shall, citizenship by reason of their
among other things, state the following: naturalization as citizens of a foreign
The file number of the petition, the country are hereby deemed to have re-
number of the naturalization certificate, acquired Philippine citizenship upon
the signature of the person naturalized taking the following oath of
affixed in the presence of the clerk of the allegiance to the Republic:
court, the personal circumstances of the
person naturalized, the dates on which his "I _____________________, solemnly swear
declaration of intention and petition were (or affrim) that I will support and defend
filed, the date of the decision granting the the Constitution of the Republic of the
petition, and the name of the judge who Philippines and obey the laws and legal
rendered the decision. A photograph of orders promulgated by the duly
the petitioner with the dry seal affixed constituted authorities of the Philippines;
thereto of the court which granted the and I hereby declare that I recognize and
petition, must be affixed to the certificate. accept the supreme authority of the
Philippines and will maintain true faith
Before the naturalization certificate is and allegiance thereto; and that I imposed
issued, the petitioner shall, in open court, this obligation upon myself voluntarily
take the following oath: without mental reservation or purpose of
evasion."
"I, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . , solemnly swear that I renounce
running for any elective local position: . . . (d) hand, refers to the situation in which a person
Those with dual citizenship.” This provision is simultaneously owes, by some positive act,
incorporated in the Charter of the City of loyalty to two or more states. While dual
Makati. citizenship is involuntary, dual allegiance is
the result of an individual’s volition.
Invoking the maxim dura lex sed lex,
petitioner, as well as the Solicitor General, With respect to dual allegiance, Article IV, §5
who sides with him in this case, contends that of the Constitution provides: “Dual allegiance
through §40(d) of the Local Government Code, of citizens is inimical to the national interest
Congress has “command[ed] in explicit terms and shall be dealt with by law.” This provision
the ineligibility of persons possessing dual was included in the 1987 Constitution at the
allegiance to hold local elective office.” instance of Commissioner Blas F. Ople
whoexplained its necessity as follows:
To begin with, dual citizenship is different
from dual allegiance. The former arises when, . . .I want to draw attention to the fact that
as a result of the concurrent application of the dual allegiance is not dual citizenship. I have
different laws of two or more states, a person circulated a memorandum to the Bernas
is simultaneously considered a national by the Committee according to which a dual
said states. For instance, such a situation may allegiance—and I reiterate a dual allegiance—
arise when a person whose parents are is larger and more threatening than that of
citizens of a state which adheres to the mere double citizenship which is seldom
principle of jus sanguinis is born in a state intentional and, perhaps, never insidious.
which follows the doctrine of jus soli. Such a That is often a function of the accident of
person, ipso facto and without any voluntary mixed marriages or of birth on foreign soil.
act on his part, is concurrently considered a And so, I do not question double citizenship at
citizen of both states. all.
Considering the citizenship clause (Art. IV) of What we would like the Committee to consider
our Constitution, it is possible for the is to take constitutional cognizance of the
following classes of citizens of the Philippines problem of dual allegiance. For example, we
to possess dual citizenship: all know what happens in the triennial
elections of the Federation of Filipino-Chinese
(1) Those born of Filipino fathers and/or Chambers of Commerce which consists of
mothers in foreign countries which follow the about 600 chapters all over the country. There
principle of jus soli; is a Peking ticket, as well as a Taipei ticket.
Not widely known is the fact that the Filipino-
(2) Those born in the Philippines of Filipino Chinese community is represented in the
mothers and alien fathers if by the laws of Legislative Yuan of the Republic of China in
their fathers’ country such children are Taiwan. And until recently, the sponsor might
citizens of that country; recall, in Mainland China in the People’s
Republic of China, they have the Associated
(3) Those who marry aliens if by the laws of Legislative Council for overseas Chinese
the latter’s country the former are considered wherein all of Southeast Asia including some
citizens, unless by their act or omission they European and Latin countries were
are deemed to have renounced Philippine represented, which was dissolved after several
citizenship. years because of diplomatic friction. At that
time, the Filipino-Chinese were also
There may be other situations in which a represented in that Overseas Council.
citizen of the Philippines may, without
performing any act, be also a citizen of When I speak of double allegiance, therefore, I
another state; but the above cases are clearly speak of this unsettled kind of allegiance of
possible given the constitutional provisions on Filipinos, of citizens who are already Filipinos
citizenship. Dual allegiance, on the other but who, by their acts, may be said to be
bound by a second allegiance, either to Peking diplomatic relations with the People’s
or Taiwan. I also took close note of the concern Republic of China was made in 1975, a good
expressed by some Commissioners yesterday, number of these naturalized Filipinos still
including Commissioner Villacorta, who were routinely go to Taipei every October 10; and it
concerned about the lack of guarantees of is asserted that some of them do renew their
thorough assimilation, and especially oath of allegiance to a foreign government
Commissioner Concepcion who has always maybe just to enter into the spirit of the
been worried about minority claims on our occasion when the anniversary of the Sun Yat-
natural resources. Sen Republic is commemorated. And so, I
have detected a genuine and deep concern
Dual allegiance can actually siphon scarce about double citizenship, with its attendant
national capital to Taiwan, Singapore, China risk of double allegiance which is repugnant to
or Malaysia, and this is already happening. our sovereignty and national security. I
Some of the great commercial places in appreciate what the Committee said that this
downtown Taipei are Filipino-owned, owned could be left to the determination of a future
by Filipino-Chinese—it is of common legislature. But considering the scale of the
knowledge in Manila. It can mean a tragic problem, the real impact on the security of
capital outflow when we have to endure a this country, arising from, let us say,
capital famine which also means economic potentially great numbers of double citizens
stagnation, worsening unemployment and professing double allegiance, will the
social unrest. Committee entertain a proposed amendment
at the proper time that will prohibit, in effect,
And so, this is exactly what we ask—that the or regulate double citizenship?
Committee kindly consider incorporating a
new section, probably Section 5, in the article Clearly, in including §5 in Article IV on
on Citizenship which will read as follows: citizenship, the concern of the Constitutional
Commission was not with dual citizens per se
DUAL ALLEGIANCE IS INIMICAL TO but with naturalized citizens who maintain
CITIZENSHIP AND SHALL BE DEALT their allegiance to their countries of origin
WITH ACCORDING TO LAW. even after their naturalization. Hence, the
phrase “dual citizenship” in R.A. No. 7160,
In another session of the Commission, Ople §40(d) and in R.A. No. 7854, §20 must be
spoke on the problem of these citizens with understood as referring to “dual allegiance.”
dual allegiance, thus:
Consequently, persons with mere dual
. . . A significant number of Commissioners citizenship do not fall under this
expressed their concern about dual citizenship disqualification. Unlike those with dual
in the sense that it implies a double allegiance allegiance, who must, therefore, be subject to
under a double sovereignty which some of us strict process with respect to the termination
who spoke then in a freewheeling debate of their status, for candidates with dual
thought would be repugnant to the citizenship, it should suffice if, upon the filing
sovereignty which pervades the Constitution of their certificates of candidacy, they elect
and to citizenship itself which implies a Philippine citizenship to terminate their
uniqueness and which elsewhere in the status as persons with dual citizenship
Constitution is defined in terms of rights and considering that their condition is the
obligations exclusive to that citizenship unavoidable consequence of conflicting laws of
including, of course, the obligation to rise to different states. As Joaquin G. Bernas, one of
the defense of the State when it is threatened, the most perceptive members of the
and back of this, Commissioner Bernas, is, of Constitutional Commission, pointed out:
course, the concern for national security. In
the course of those debates, I think some “[D]ual citizenship is just a reality imposed on
noted the fact that as a result of the wave of us because we have no control of the laws on
naturalizations since the decision to establish citizenship of other countries. We recognize a
child of a Filipino mother. But whether or not The record shows that private respondent was
she is considered a citizen of another country born in San Francisco, California on
is something completely beyond our control.” September 4, 1955, of Filipino parents. Since
the Philippines adheres to the principle of jus
By electing Philippine citizenship, such sanguinis, while the United States follows the
candidates at the same time forswear doctrine of jus soli, the parties agree that, at
allegiance to the other country of which they birth at least, he was a national both of the
are also citizens and thereby terminate their Philippines and of the United States.
status as dual citizens. It may be that, from
the point of view of the foreign state and of its However, the COMELEC en banc held that,
laws, such an individual has not effectively by participating in Philippine elections in
renounced his foreign citizenship. 1992, 1995, and 1998, private respondent
“effectively renounced his U.S. citizenship
This is similar to the requirement that an under American law,” so that now he is solely
applicant for naturalization must renounce a Philippine national.
“all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign
prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty” of Petitioner challenges this ruling. He argues
which at the time he is a subject or citizen that merely taking part in Philippine elections
before he can be issued a certificate of is not sufficient evidence of renunciation and
naturalization as a citizen of the Philippines. that, in any event, as the alleged renunciation
In Parado v. Republic, it was held: was made when private respondent was
already 37 years old, it was ineffective as it
[W]hen a person applying for citizenship by should have been made when he reached the
naturalization takes an oath that he age of majority.
renounces his loyalty to any other country or
government and solemnly declares that he In holding that by voting in Philippine
owes his allegiance to the Republic of the elections private respondent renounced his
Philippines, the condition imposed by law is American citizenship, the COMELEC must
satisfied and complied with. The have in mind §349 of the Immigration and
determination whether such renunciation is Nationality Act of the United States, which
valid or fully complies with the provisions of provided that “A person who is a national of
our Naturalization Law lies within the the United States, whether by birth or
province and is an exclusive prerogative of our naturalization, shall lose his nationality by: . .
courts. The latter should apply the law duly . (e) Voting in a political election in a foreign
enacted by the legislative department of the state or participating in an election or
Republic. No foreign law may or should plebiscite to determine the sovereignty over
interfere with its operation and application. If foreign territory.” To be sure this provision
the requirement of the Chinese Law of was declared unconstitutional by the U.S.
Nationality were to be read into our Supreme Court in Afroyim v. Rusk as beyond
Naturalization Law, we would be applying not the power given to the U.S. Congress to
what our legislative department has deemed it regulate foreign relations. However, by filing a
wise to require, but what a foreign certificate of candidacy when he ran for his
government has thought or intended to exact. present post, private respondent elected
Philippine citizenship and in effect renounced
That, of course, is absurd. It must be resisted his American citizenship. Private respondent’s
by all means and at all cost. It would be a certificate of candidacy, filed on March 27,
brazen encroachment upon the sovereign will 1998, contained the following statements
and power of the people of this Republic. made under oath:
. . . Considering the fact that admittedly electing Philippine citizenship, renounces his
Osmeña was both a Filipino and an American, foreign nationality, but subsequently does
the mere fact that he has a Certificate stating some act constituting renunciation of his
he is an American does not mean that he is Philippine citizenship.
not still a Filipino . . . . [T]he Certification that
he is an American does not mean that he is Maquiling vs. Commission on Elections
not still a Filipino, possessed as he is, of both G. R. No. 195649, 16 April 2013
nationalities or citizenships. Indeed, there is 696 SCRA 420
no express renunciation here of Philippine
citizenship; truth to tell, there is even no G. R. No. 195649, 2 July 2013
implied renunciation of said citizenship. When 700 SCRA 367
We consider that the renunciation needed to
lose Philippine citizenship must be “express,” Facts:
it stands to reason that there can be no such Rommel Arnado, a natural-born Filipino
loss of Philippine citizenship when there is no citizen who was naturalized as an American
renunciation, either “express” or “implied.” citizen, applied for repatriation under RA
9225 at the Philippine Consulate General in
To recapitulate, by declaring in his certificate San Francisco, USA, which was approved and
of candidacy that he is a Filipino citizen; that later on took an oath of allegiance. He filed his
he is not a permanent resident or immigrant certificate of candidacy for mayor of
of another country; that he will defend and Kauswagan, Lanao del Norte. Linog Balua,
support the Constitution of the Philippines another mayoral candidate, filed a
and bear true faith and allegiance thereto and disqualification case against Arnado in
that he does so without mental reservation, connection with the 2010 elections, based on
private respondent has, as far as the laws of the computer database indicating his
this country are concerned, effectively nationality as American. The Comelec
repudiated his American citizenship and required Arnado to answer on the case but he
anything which he may have said before as a failed to do such. Balua moved to declare
dual citizen. Arnado in default and to present evidence ex
parte but both were not acted upon, having
On the other hand, private respondent’s oath been overtaken by the 2010 elections where
of allegiance to the Philippines, when Arnado garnered the highest number of votes
considered with the fact that he has spent his and subsequently proclaimed as mayor of
youth and adulthood, received his education, Kauswagan, in which Arnado filed his answer
practiced his profession as an artist, and after the said proclamation. The Comelec 1st
taken part in past elections in this country, Division ruled on the disqualification of
leaves no doubt of his election of Philippine Arnado, but its en banc reversed the division
citizenship. ruling.
existing laws of the Philippines and the showing his continued possession of a foreign
following conditions: citizenship.
commenced before the effectivity of the new required to register as an alien. Pertinently,
Constitution. the person electing Philippine citizenship is
required to file a petition with the
Being a legitimate child, respondent’s Commission of Immigration and Deportation
citizenship followed that of her father who is (now Bureau of Immigration) for the
Chinese, unless upon reaching the age of cancellation of his alien certificate of
majority, she elects Philippine citizenship. It registration based on his aforesaid election of
is a settled rule that only legitimate children Philippine citizenship and said Office will
follow the citizenship of the father and that initially decide, based on the evidence
illegitimate children are under the parental presented the validity or invalidity of said
authority of the mother and follow her election. Afterwards, the same is elevated to
nationality. An illegitimate child of Filipina the Ministry (now Department) of Justice for
need not perform any act to confer upon him final determination and review.
all the rights and privileges attached to
citizens of the Philippines; he automatically It should be stressed that there is no specific
becomes a citizen himself. But in the case of statutory or procedural rule which authorizes
respondent, for her to be considered a Filipino the direct filing of a petition for declaration of
citizen, she must have validly elected election of Philippine citizenship before the
Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age courts. The special proceeding provided under
of majority. Section 2, Rule 108 of the Rules of Court on
Cancellation or Correction of Entries in the
Commonwealth Act (C.A.) No. 625, enacted Civil Registry, merely allows any interested
pursuant to Section 1(4), Article IV of the party to file an action for cancellation or
1935 Constitution, prescribes the procedure correction of entry in the civil registry, i.e.,
that should be followed in order to make a election, loss and recovery of citizenship,
valid election of Philippine citizenship, to wit: which is not the relief prayed for by the
respondent.
“Section 1. The option to elect Philippine
citizenship in accordance with subsection (4), Be that as it may, even if we set aside this
[S]ection 1, Article IV, of the Constitution procedural infirmity, still the trial court’s
shall be expressed in a statement to be signed conclusion that respondent duly elected
and sworn to by the party concerned before Philippine citizenship is erroneous since the
any officer authorized to administer oaths, records undisputably show that respondent
and shall be filed with the nearest civil failed to comply with the legal requirements
registry. The said party shall accompany the for a valid election. Specifically, respondent
aforesaid statement with the oath of had not executed a sworn statement of her
allegiance to the Constitution and the election of Philippine citizenship. The only
Government of the Philippines.” documentary evidence submitted by
respondent in support of her claim of alleged
Based on the foregoing, the statutory election was her oath of allegiance, executed
formalities of electing Philippine citizenship 12 years after she reached the age of majority,
are: (1) a statement of election under oath; (2) which was unregistered. As aptly pointed out
an oath of allegiance to the Constitution and by the petitioner, even assuming arguendo
Government of the Philippines; and (3) that respondent’s oath of allegiance suffices,
registration of the statement of election and of its execution was not within a reasonable time
the oath with the nearest civil registry. after respondent attained the age of majority
and was not registered with the nearest civil
Furthermore, no election of Philippine registry as required under Section 1 of C.A.
citizenship shall be accepted for registration No. 625. The phrase “reasonable time” has
under C.A. No. 625 unless the party exercising been interpreted to mean that the election
the right of election has complied with the should be made generally within three (3)
requirements of the Alien Registration Act of years from reaching the age of majority.
1950. In other words, he should first be Moreover, there was no satisfactory
designated representative shall extend initiative shall then be held on the date
assistance in the formulation of the set, after which the results thereof shall
proposition. be certified and proclaimed by the
Commission on Elections.
(d) Two or more propositions may be
submitted in an initiative. Section 14. Effectivity of Local
Propositions.—If the proposition is
(e) Proponents shall have one hundred approved by a majority of the votes cast, it
twenty (120) days in case of autonomous shall take effect fifteen (15) days after
regions, ninety (90) days in case of certification by the Commission as if
provinces and cities, sixty (60) days in affirmative action thereon had been made
case of municipalities, and thirty (30) by the local legislative body and local
days in case of barangays, from notice executive concerned. If it fails to obtain
mentioned in subsection (b) hereof to said number of votes, the proposition is
collect the required number of signatures. considered defeated.
(f) The petition shall be signed before the Section 15. Limitations on Local
Election Registrar, or his designated Initiatives.—(a) The power of local
representatives, in the presence of a initiative shall not be exercised more than
representative of the proponent, and a once a year.
representative of the regional assemblies
and local legislative bodies concerned in a (b) Initiative shall extend only to subjects
public place in the autonomous region or or matters which are within the legal
local government unit, as the case may be. powers of the local legislative bodies to
Signature stations may be established in enact.
as many places as may be warranted.
(c) If at any time before the initiative is
(g) Upon the lapse of the period herein held, the local legislative body shall adopt
provided, the Commission on Elections, in toto the proposition presented, the
through its office in the local government initiative shall be cancelled. However,
unit concerned shall certify as to whether those against such action may, if they so
or not the required number of signatures desire, apply for initiative in the manner
has been obtained. Failure to obtain the herein provided.
required number is a defeat of the
proposition. Section 16. Limitations Upon Local
Legislative Bodies.—Any proposition or
(h) If the required number of signatures is ordinance or resolution approved through
obtained, the Commission shall then set a the system of initiative and referendum
date for the initiative at which the as herein provided shall not be repealed,
proposition shall be submitted to the modified or amended, by the local
registered voters in the local government legislative body concerned within six (6)
unit concerned for their approval within months from the date therefrom, and may
ninety (90) days from the date of be amended, modified or repealed by the
certification by the Commission, as local legislative body within three (3)
provided in subsection (g) hereof, in case years thereafter by a vote of three-fourths
of autonomous regions, sixty (60) days in (3/4) of all its members: Provided,
case of provinces and cities, forty-five (45) however, That in case of barangays, the
days in case of municipalities, and thirty
(30) days in case of barangays. The
period shall be one (1) year after the adoption, enactment, repeal, or
expiration of the first six (6) months. amendment of an ordinance.
Said referendum shall be held under the (c) The proposition shall be numbered
control and direction of the Commission serially starting from Roman numeral I.
within sixty (60) days in case of provinces The COMELEC or its designated
and cities, forty-five (45) days in case of representative shall extend assistance in
municipalities and thirty (30) days in case the formulation of the proposition.
of barangays.
(d) Two (2) or more propositions may be
The Commission shall certify and submitted in an initiative.
proclaim the results of the said
referendum. (e) Proponents shall have ninety (90) days
in case of provinces and cities, sixty (60)
- RA 7160, Local Government Code of days in case of municipalities, and thirty
1991, Sections 120-126 (30) days in case of barangays, from notice
mentioned in subsection (b) hereof to
Section 120. Local Initiative Defined. - collect the required number of signatures.
Local initiative is the legal process (f) The petition shall be signed before the
whereby the registered voters of a election registrar. or his designated
local government unit may directly representatives, in the presence of a
propose, enact, or amend any representative of the proponent, and a
ordinance. representative of the sanggunian
concerned in a public place in the local
Section 121. Who May Exercise. - The government unit, as the case may be.
power of local initiative and Stations for collecting signatures may be
referendum may be exercised by all established in as many places as may be
registered voters of the provinces, warranted.
cities, municipalities, and barangays.
(g) Upon the lapse of the period herein
Section 122. Procedure in Local Initiative. provided, the COMELEC, through its
- office in the local government unit
concerned, shall certify as to whether or
(a) Not less than one thousand (1,000) not the required number of signatures has
registered voters in case of provinces and been obtained. Failure to obtain the
cities, one hundred (100) in case of required number defeats the proposition.
municipalities, and fifty (50) in case of
barangays, may file a petition with the (h) If the required number of signatures is
sanggunian concerned proposing the obtained, the COMELEC shall then set a
date for the initiative during which the
proposition shall be submitted to the within six (6) months from the date of the
registered voters in the local government approval thereof, and may be amended,
unit concerned for their approval within modified or repealed by the sanggunian
sixty (60) days from the date of within three (3) years thereafter by a vote
certification by the COMELEC, as of three-fourths (3/4) of all its members:
provided in subsection (g) hereof, in case Provided, That in case of barangays, the
of provinces and cities, forty-five (45) days period shall be eighteen (18) months after
in case of municipalities, and thirty (30) the approval thereof.
days in case of barangays. The initiative
shall then be held on the date set, after Section 126. Local Referendum Defined. -
which the results thereof shall be certified Local referendum is the legal process
and proclaimed by the COMELEC. whereby the registered voters of the local
government units may approve, amend or
Section 123. Effectivity of Local reject any ordinance enacted by the
Propositions. - If the proposition is sanggunian.
approved by a majority of the votes cast, it
shall take effect fifteen (15) days after The local referendum shall be held under
certification by the COMELEC as if the control and direction of the
affirmative action thereon had been made COMELEC within sixty (60) days in case
by the sanggunian and local chief of provinces and cities, forty-five (45) days
executive concerned. If it fails to obtain in case of municipalities and thirty (30)
said number of votes, the proposition is days in case of barangays.
considered defeated.
The COMELEC shall certify and proclaim
Section 124. Limitations on Local the results of the said referendum.
Initiative. -
- Limitations on local initiative(Section
(a) The power of local initiative shall not 124)
be exercised more than once a year.
Section 124. Limitations on Local
(b) Initiative shall extend only to subjects Initiative. -
or matters which are within the legal
powers of the sanggunian to enact. (a) The power of local initiative shall not
be exercised more than once a year.
(c) If at any time before the initiative is
held, the sanggunian concerned adopts in (b) Initiative shall extend only to subjects
toto the proposition presented and the or matters which are within the legal
local chief executive approves the same, powers of the sanggunian to enact.
the initiative shall be cancelled. However,
those against such action may, if they so (c) If at any time before the initiative is
desire, apply for initiative in the manner held, the sanggunian concerned adopts in
herein provided. toto the proposition presented and the
local chief executive approves the same,
Section 125. Limitations upon the initiative shall be cancelled. However,
Sanggunians. - Any proposition or those against such action may, if they so
ordinance approved through the system of desire, apply for initiative in the manner
initiative and referendum as herein herein provided.
provided shall not be repealed, modified
or amended by the sanggunian concerned
The local referendum shall be held under (1) At least twenty-five percent (25%) in
the control and direction of the the case of local government units with a
COMELEC within sixty (60) days in case voting population of not more than twenty
of provinces and cities, forty-five (45) days thousand (20,000);
Section 71. Election on Recall. - Upon the Section 75. Expenses Incident to Recall
filing of a valid petition for recall with the Elections. - All expenses incident to recall
appropriate local office of the Comelec, the elections shall be borne by the
Comelec or its duly authorized COMELEC. For this purpose, there shall
representative shall set the date of the be included in the annual General
election or recall, which shall not be later Appropriations Act a contingency fund at
than thirty (30) days upon the completion the disposal of the COMELEC for the
of the procedure outlined in the preceding conduct of recall elections.
article, in the case of the barangay, city or
municipal officials, and forty-five (45) - Prohibition from resignation(Section 73)
days in the case of provincial officials. The
officials sought to be recalled shall Section 73. Prohibition from Resignation.
automatically be considered as duly - The elective local official sought to be
registered candidate or candidates to the recalled shall not be allowed to resign
pertinent positions and, like other while the recall process is in progress.
candidates, shall be entitled to be voted
upon. (As amended by Section 2 of - Limitations on Recall(Section 74)
Republic Act No. 9244)
Section 74. Limitations on Recall. -
Section 72. Effectivity of Recall. - The
recall of an elective local official shall be (a) Any elective local official may be the
effective only upon the election and subject of a recall election only once
proclamation of a successor in the person during his term of office for loss of
of the candidate receiving the highest confidence.
number of votes cast during the election
on recall. Should the official sought to be (b) No recall shall take place within one
recalled receive the highest number of (1) year from the date of the official's
votes, confidence in him is thereby assumption to office or one (1) year
affirmed, and he shall continue in office. immediately preceding a regular local
election.
Section 73. Prohibition from Resignation.
- The elective local official sought to be C. Qualifications and disqualifications of
recalled shall not be allowed to resign voters(Article V, Section 1)
while the recall process is in progress.
Section 1. Suffrage may be exercised by
Section 74. Limitations on Recall. - all citizens of the Philippines not
otherwise disqualified by law, who are
at least eighteen years of age, and who
shall have resided in the Philippines Any person who temporarily resides in
for at least one year, and in the place another city, municipality or country
wherein they propose to vote, for at solely by reason of his occupation,
least six months immediately profession, employment in private or
preceding the election. No literacy, public service, educational activities, work
property, or other substantive in the military or naval reservations
requirement shall be imposed on the within the Philippines, service in the
exercise of suffrage. Armed Forces of the Philippines, the
National Police Forces, or confinement or
- RA 8189 – Voter’s Registration Act detention in government institutions in
(1996) accordance with law, shall not be deemed
to have lost his original residence.
Section 7. General Registration of Voters. -
Immediately after the barangay elections Any person, who, on the day of
in 1997, the existing certified list of voters registration may not have reached the
shall cease to be effective and operative. required age or period of residence but,
For purposed of the May 1998 elections who, on the day of the election shall
and all elections, plebiscites, referenda, possess such qualifications, may register
initiatives, and recalls subsequent as a voter.
thereto, the Commission shall undertake
a general registration of voters before the Section 10. Registration of Voters. - A
Board of Election Inspectors on June 14, qualified voter shall be registered in the
15, 21, and 22 and, subject to the permanent list of voters in a precinct of
discretion of the Commission, on June 28 the city or municipality wherein he
and 29, 1997 in accordance with this Act. resides to be able to vote in any election.
To register as a voter, he shall personally
Section 8. System of Continuing accomplish an application form for
Registration of Voters. - The personal registration as prescribed by the
filing of application of registration of Commission in three (3) copies before the
voters shall be conducted daily in the Election Officer on any date during office
office of the Election Officer during hours after having acquired the
regular office hours. No registration shall, qualifications of a voter.
however, be conducted during the period
starting one hundred twenty (120) days The application shall contain the
before a regular election and ninety (90) following data:
days before a special election.
a. Name, surname, middle name,
Section 9. Who may Register. - All citizens and/or maternal surname;
of the Philippines not otherwise b. Sex;
disqualified by law who are at least c. Date, and place of birth;
eighteen (18) years of age, and who shall d. Citizenship;
have resided in the Philippines for at e. Civil status, if married, name of
least one (1) year, and in the place spouse;
wherein they propose to vote, for at least f. Profession, occupation or work
six (6) months immediately preceding the g. Periods of residence in the
election, may register as a voter. Philippines and in the place of
registration;
h. Exact address with the name of
the street and house number for location
in the precinct maps maintained by the tribunal of having committed any crime
local office of the Commission, or in case involving disloyalty to the duly
there is none, a brief description of his constituted government such as rebellion,
residence, sitio, and barangay; sedition, violation of the firearms laws or
i. A statement that the applicant any crime against national security,
possesses all the qualifications of a voter; unless restored to his full civil and
j. A statement that the applicant is political rights in accordance with law:
not a registered voter of any precinct; and Provided, That he shall automatically
k. Such information or data as may reacquire the right to vote upon
be required by the Commission. expiration of five (5) years after service of
sentence; and
The application for registration shall
contain three (3) specimen signatures of c. Insane or incompetent persons
the applicant, clear and legible rolled declared as such by competent authority
prints of his left and right thumbprints, unless subsequently declared by proper
with four (4) identification size copies of authority that such person is no longer
his latest photograph, attached thereto, to insane or incompetent.
be taken at the expense of the
Commission. Section 12. Change of Residence to
Another City or Municipality. - Any
Before the applicant accomplishes his registered voter who has transferred
application for registration, the Election residence to another city or municipality
Officer shall inform him of the may apply with the Election Officer of his
qualifications and disqualifications new residence for the transfer of his
prescribed by law for a voter, and registration records.
thereafter, see to it that the accomplished
application contains all the data therein The application for transfer of registration
required and that the applicant's shall be subject to the requirements of
specimen signatures, fingerprints, and notice and hearing and the approval of
photographs are properly affixed in all the Election Registration Board, in
copies of the voter's application. accordance with this Act. Upon approval
of the application for transfer, and after
Section 11. Disqualification. - The notice of such approval to the Election
following shall be disqualified from Officer of the former residence of the
registering: voter, said Election Officer shall transmit
by registered mail the voter's registration
a. Any person who has been record to the Election Officer of the voter's
sentenced by final judgment to suffer new residence.
imprisonment of not less than one (1)
year, such disability not having been Section 13. Change of Address in the
removed by plenary pardon or amnesty: Same City or Municipality. - Any voter
Provided, however, That any person who has changed his address in the same
disqualified to vote under this paragraph city or municipality shall immediately
shall automatically reacquire the right to notify the Election Officer in writing. If
vote upon expiration of five (5) years after the change of address involves a change in
service of sentence; precinct, the Board shall transfer his
registration record to the precinct book of
b. Any person who has been adjudged voters of his new precinct and notify the
by final judgment by a competent court or voter of his new precinct All changes of
7) The seventh copy shall be deposited organization may use the four certified
inside the compartment of the ballot box copies of election returns for the conduct
for valid ballots. of citizens' quick counts at the local or
national levels;
8) The eight copy to the Provincial Board
of canvassers; B. In the election of local officials and
members of the House of Representatives:
9) The ninth to the eighteenth copies,
shall be given to the ten (10) accredited 1) The First copy shall be delivered to the
major national parties, excluding the city or municipal board of canvassers;
dominant majority and minority parties,
in accordance with a voluntary agreement 2) The second copy, to the Commission;
among them. If no such agreement is
reached, the Commission shall decide 3) The third copy, to the provincial board
which parties shall receive the copies on of canvassers;
the basis of the criteria provided in
Section 26 of Republic Act No. 7166; 4) The fourth copy, to the citizens' arm
authorized by the Commission to conduct
10) The nineteenth and twentieth copies, an unofficial count;
to the two accredited major local parties
in accordance with a voluntary agreement 5) The fifth copy, to the dominant
among them. If no such agreement is majority party as determined by the
reached, the commission shall decide Commission in accordance with law;
which parties shall receive the copies on
the basis of criteria analogous to that 6) The sixth copy, to the dominant
provided in Section 26 of Republic Act No. minority party as determined by the
7166; Commission in accordance with law; and
11) The twenty-first to the twenty-fourth 7) The seventh copy shall be deposited
copies, to national broadcast or print inside the copy shall deposited inside the
media entities as may be equitably compartment of the ballot box for valid
determined by the Commission in view of ballots.
propagating the copies to the widest
extent possible; 8) The eight copy to be posted
conspicuously on a wall within the
12) The twenty-fifth and twenty-six premises of the polling place or counting
copies, to local broadcast or print media center;
entities as may be equitably determined
by the Commission in view of propagating 9) The ninth to the eighteenth copies,
the copies to the widest extent possible; shall be given to the ten (10) accredited
and major national parties, excluding the
dominant majority and minority parties,
13) The twenty-seventh to the thirtieth in accordance with a voluntary agreement
copies, to the major citizen's arms, among them. If no such agreement is
including the accredited citizen's arm, and reached, the Commission shall decide
other non-partisan groups or organization which parties shall receive the copies on
enlisted by the Commission pursuant to the basis of the criteria provided in
Section 52(k) of Batas Pambansa Blg. 881. Section 26 of Republic Act No. 7166;
Such citizens' arm, groups and
10) The nineteenth and twentieth copies detach the election return from the wall
shall be given to the two accredited major and keep the same in his custody to be
local parties in accordance with a produced as may be requested by any
voluntary agreement among them. If no voter for image or data capturing or for
such agreement is reached, the any lawful purpose as may be ordered by
Commission shall decide which parties competent authority.
shall receive the copies on the basis of
criteria analogous to that provided in Within one hour after the printing of the
Section 26 of republic Act No. 7166; election returns, the chairman of the
board of election inspectors or any official
11) The twenty-first to the twenty-fifth authorized by the Commission shall, in
copies, to national broadcast or print the presence of watchers and
media entities as may be equitably representatives of the accredited citizens'
determined by the Commission in view of arm, political parties/candidates, if any,
propagating the copies to the widest electronically transmit the precinct
extent possible; results to the respective levels of board of
canvassers, to the dominant majority and
12) The twenty-sixth and twenty-seventh minority party, to the accredited citizen's
copies, to local broadcast or print media arm, and to the Kapisanan ng mga
entities as may be equitably determined Brodcaster ng Pilipinas (KBP).
by the Commission in view of propagating
the copies to the widest extent possible; The election results at the
and city/municipality canvassing centers shall
be transmitted in the same manner by the
13) The twenty-eighth to the thirtieth election officer or any official authorized
copies to the major citizens' arms, by the commission to the district or
including the accredited citizens' arm, and provincial canvassing centers.
other non-partisan groups or organization
enlisted by the Commission pursuant to The election returns transmitted
section 52(k) of Batas Pambansa Blg. 881. electronically and digitally signed shall be
Such citizens' arms, groups and considered as official election results and
organization may use the five certified shall be used as the basis for the
copies of election returns for the conduct canvassing of votes and the proclamation
of citizens' quick counts at the local or of a candidate.
national levels.
After the electronic results have been
Immediately after the eight copy is transmitted additional copies not to
printed, the poll clerk shall announce the exceed thirty (30) may be printed and
posting of said copy on a wall within the given to requesting parties at their own
premises of the polling place or counting expense.(As amended by Section 19 of
center, which must be sufficiently lighted Republic Act No. 9369)
and accessible to the public. Any person
may view or capture an image of the Section 25. Canvassing by Provincial,
election return by means of any data City, District and Municipal Boards of
capturing device such as, but not limited Canvassers. - The City or Municipal board
to cameras at any time of the day for of canvassers shall canvass the votes for
forty-eight (48) hours following its the president, vice-president, senators,
posting. After such period, the chairman and parties, organization or coalitions
of the board of election inspectors shall participating under the party-list system
and senators and thereafter, proclaim the the city or municipal board of canvassers
elected members of the House of and distributed as follows:
Representatives and the provincial
official. (1) The first copy shall be delivered to the
provincial board of canvassers for use in
The municipal, city, district and the canvass of election results for
provincial certificates of canvass of votes president, vice-president, senators,
shall each be supported by a statement of members of the House of Representatives,
votes. parties, organization or coalitions
participating under the party-list system
Within one hour after the canvassing, the and elective provincial officials;
Chairman of the district or provincial
Board of Canvassers or the city board of (2) The second copy shall be sent to the
canvassers of those cities which comprise Commission;
one or more legislative districts shall
electronically transmit the certificate of (3) The third copy shall be kept by the
canvass to the commission sitting as the chairman of the board; and
national board of canvassers for senators
and party-list representatives and to the (4) The fourth copy shall be given to the
Congress as the National Board of citizen arm designated by the Commission
Canvassers for the president and vice to conduct an unofficial count. It shall be
president, directed to the President of the the duty of the citizens' arm to furnish
Senate. independent candidates' copies of the
certificate of canvass at the expense of the
The Commission shall adopt adequate requesting party.
and effective measures to preserve the
integrity of the certificates of canvass (5) The fifth copy to Congress, directed to
transmitted electronically and the results the President of Senate;
in the storage devices at the various levels
of the boards of canvassers. (6) The sixth copy to be posted on a wall
within the premises of the canvassing
The certificates of canvass transmitted center;
electronically and digitally signed shall be
considered as official election results and (7) The seventh and eighth copies shall be
shall be used as the basis for the given to the dominant majority and
proclamation of a winning candidate.(As minority parties;
amended by Section 20 of Republic Act No.
9369) (8) The ninth to eighteenth copies shall be
given to the ten (10) accredited major
Section 26. Number of Copies of national parties, excluding the dominant
Certificates of Canvass of Votes and their majority and minority parties, in
distribution. - (a) The certificate of accordance with a voluntary agreement
canvass of votes for president, vice- among them. If no such agreement is
president, senators, members of the reached, the Commission shall decide
House of Representatives, parties, which parties shall receive the copies on
organization or coalitions participating the basis of the criteria provided in
under the party-list system and elective Section 26 of Republic Act no. 7166;
provincial officials shall be produced by
(9) The nineteenth and twentieth copies boards of canvassers in the Metro Manila
shall be given to the two accredited major area, and other highly urbanized areas
local parties in accordance with a and distributed as follows:
voluntary agreement among them. If no
such agreement is reached, the (1) The first copy shall be sent to congress
Commission shall decide which parties , directed to the president of the Senate
shall receive the copies on the basis of for use in the canvass of election results
criteria analogous to that provided in for president and vice-president;
Section 26 of Republic Act No. 7166;
(2) The second copy shall be sent to the
(10) The twenty-first to the twenty-fifth Commission for use in the canvass of the
copies to national broadcast or print election results for senators;
media entities as may be equitably
determined by the Commission in view of (3) The third copy shall be kept the
propagating the copies to the widest chairman of the board; and
extent possible;
(4) The fourth copy shall be given to the
(11) The twenty-six and twenty-seven citizens' arm designated by the
copies, to local broadcast or print media Commission to conduct an unofficial
entities as may be equitably determined count. It shall be the duty of the citizens'
by the Commission in view of propagating arm to furnish independent candidates
the copies to the widest extent possible; copies of the certificate of canvass at the
and expense of the requesting party.
(12) The twenty-eighth to the thirtieth (5) The fifth copy to Congress, directed to
copies, to the major citizens' arms, the President of the Senate;
including the accredited citizens' arm, and
other non-partisan groups or (6) The six copy to be posted on a wall
organizations enlisted by the commission within the premises of the canvassing
pursuant to Section 52(k) of Batas center;
Pambansa Blg. 881. Such citizens' arms,
groups and organization may use the (7) The seventh and eight copies to the
three certified copies of election returns dominant majority and minority parties;
for the conduct of citizens' quick counts at
the local or national levels; (8) The ninth and tenth copies to two
accredited major national parties
The board of canvassers shall furnish all representing the majority and minority,
other registered parties copies of the excluding the dominant majority and
certificate of canvass at the expense of the minority parties, to be determined by the
requesting party. Commission on the basis of the criteria
provided in Section 26 of Republic Act No.
(b) The certificate of canvass of votes for 7166;
president, vice-president and senators,
parties, organization or coalitions (9) The eleventh to thirteenth copies to
participating under the party-list system broadcast media entities as may be
shall be produced by the city boards of equitably determined by the Commission
canvassers of cities comprising one or in view of propagating the copies to the
more legislative districts, by provincial widest extent possible; and
boards of canvassers and by district
Section 29. Random Manual Audit. - - RA 9189 – Overseas Absentee Voting Act
Where the AES is used, there shall be a (2003) (as amended by Republic Act No.
random manual audit in one precinct per 10590 – now called Overseas Voting Act)
congressional district randomly chosen by
the Commission in each province and city. Section 6. Personal Overseas Registration
Any difference between the automated and/or Certification. - Registration and/or
and manual count will result in the certification as an overseas voter shall be
determination of root cause and initiate a done in person at any post abroad or at
manual count for those precincts affected designated registration centers outside
by the computer or procedural the post or in the Philippines approved by
error.(Added by Section 24 of Republic Act the Commission.
No. 9369)
Field and mobile registration centers
Section 30. Authentication of shall be set up by the posts concerned to
Electronically Transmitted Election ensure accessibility by the overseas
Results. - The manner of determining the voters.
authenticity and due execution of the
certificates shall conform with the All applicants shall submit themselves for
provisions of Republic Act No. 7166 as live capture of their biometrics.
may be supplement or modified by the
provision of this Act, where applicable, by The Commission shall issue an overseas
appropriate authentication and voter identification card to those whose
certification procedures for electronic applications to vote have been approved.
signatures as provided in Republic Act (Added by Section 5 of Republic Act No.
No. 8792 as well as the rules promulgated 10590)
by the Supreme Court pursuant
thereto.(Added by Section 25 of Republic Section 10. Transfer of Registration
Act No. 9369) Record. - In the event of change of voting
venue, an application for transfer of
E. System of Absentee voting (Article V, registration record must be filed by the
Section 2) overseas voter with the OFOV, through
its Chairperson, at least one hundred
Section 2. The Congress shall provide a eighty (180) days prior to the start of the
system for securing the secrecy and overseas voting period: Provided, That
sanctity of the ballot as well as a system those who would eventually vote in the
for absentee voting by qualified Philippines should register within the
Filipinos abroad. time frame provided for local registration
in the municipality, city or district where
The Congress shall also design a they intend to vote: Provided, further,
procedure for the disabled and the That those who have registered in the
illiterates to vote without the assistance municipality, city or district where they
of other persons. Until then, they shall be resided prior to their departure abroad
allowed to vote under existing laws and need not register anew: Provided, finally,
such rules as the Commission on That transferees shall notify the OFOV,
Elections may promulgate to protect the through its Chairperson, of their transfer
secrecy of the ballot. back to the Philippines at least one
hundred eighty (180) days prior to the
next national elections for purposes of
cancelling their names from the CLOV
and of removing their overseas voter's (a) A valid Philippine passport. In the
registration from the book of voters. absence of a valid passport, a certification
(Added by Section 9 of Republic Act No. of the DFA that it has reviewed the
10590) appropriate documents submitted by the
applicant and has found them sufficient to
Section 11. System of Continuing warrant the issuance of a passport, or
Registration. - The Commission shall that the applicant is a holder of a valid
ensure that the benefits of the system of passport but is unable to produce the
continuing registration are extended to same for a valid reason;
qualified overseas voters. Registration
shall commence not later than six (6) (b) Accomplished registration form
months after the conduct of the last prescribed by the Commission; and
national elections. Towards this end, the
Commission shall be authorized to utilize (c) Applicants who availed themselves of
and optimize the use of existing facilities, the Citizen Retention and Reacquisition
personnel and mechanisms of the various Act (Republic Act No. 9225) shall present
government agencies for purposes of data the original or certified true copy of the
gathering and validation, information order of approval of their application to
dissemination and facilitation of the retain or reacquire their Filipino
registration process. citizenship issued by the post or their
identification certificate issued by the
Pre-departure Orientation Seminars Bureau of Immigration.
(PDOS), services and mechanisms offered
and administered by the DFA, the DOLE, The Commission may also require,
the Philippine Overseas Employment additional data to facilitate registration
Administration (POEA), the Overseas and recording. No information other than
Workers' Welfare Administration those necessary to establish the identity
(OWWA), the Commission on Filipinos and qualification of the applicant shall be
Overseas and by other appropriate required.
agencies of the government and private
agencies providing the same services shall All applications for registration and/or
include the salient features of this Act certification as an overseas voter shall be
and shall be utilized for purposes of considered as applications to vote
supporting the overseas registration and overseas. An overseas voter is presumed
voting processes. to be abroad until she/he applies for
transfer of her/his registration records or
All employment contracts processed and requests that her/his name be cancelled
approved by the POEA shall state the from the NROV. (As amended by Section
right of migrant workers to exercise their 11 of Republic Act No. 10590)
constitutional right of suffrage within the
limits provided for by this Act. (As Section 13. National Registry of Overseas
amended by Section 10 of Republic Act No. Voters (NROV). - The Commission shall
10590) maintain a National Registry of Overseas
Voters or NROV containing the names of
Section 12. Requirements for Registration. registered overseas voters and the posts
- Every Filipino registrant shall be where they are registered.
required to furnish the following
documents: Likewise, the Commission shall maintain
a registry of voters (ROV) per
The fact of deactivation shall be Section 18. Voters Excluded from the
annotated in the NROV and the NROV Through Inadvertence. - Any
registered overseas voter whose name has bulletin boards and/or websites within ten
been inadvertently omitted from the (10) days from receipt thereof.
NROV may, personally or through an
authorized representative, file with the Subject to reasonable regulation and the
RERB through the OFOV or the post payment of fees in such amounts as may
exercising jurisdiction over the voter's be fixed by the Commission, the
residence, an application under oath for candidates, political parties, accredited
reinstatement not later than one hundred citizens' arms, and all other interested
twenty (120) days before the start of the persons shall be furnished copies thereof:
voting period. Provided, That nongovernmental
organizations and other civil society
The RERB shall resolve the application organizations accredited by and working
within one (1) month from receipt thereof, with the Commission as partners on
otherwise the application shall be deemed overseas voters' education and
approved. (Added by Section 18 of participation shall be exempt from the
Republic Act No. 10590) payment of fees. (As amended by Section
20 of Republic Act No. 10590)
Section 19. Application for Correction of
Entries and Change of Name. - Any Section 21. Printing and Transmittal of
registered overseas voter who intends to Ballots, Voting Instructions, Election
change her/his name by reason of Forms and Paraphernalia. -
marriage, death of husband, or final court
judgment; or to correct a mispelled name 21.1. The Commission shall cause the
or any erroneous entry in the NROV, printing of ballots for overseas voters, and
CLOV and voter's identification card may, all other accountable election forms in
personally or through an authorized such number as may be necessary, but in
representative, file an application under no case shall these exceed the total
oath for change of name or correction of number of approved applications. Security
entries with the RERB through the OFOV markings shall be used in the printing of
or the post exercising jurisdiction over the ballots for overseas voters.
voter's residence not later than ninety
(90) days before the start of the voting 21.2. The Commission shall present to the
period. authorized representatives of the DFA
and of the accredited major political
The RERB shall resolve the application parties the ballots for overseas voters,
within one (1) month from receipt thereof, voting instructions, election forms and
otherwise the application shall be deemed other election paraphernalia for scrutiny
approved. (Added by Section 19 of and inspection prior to their transmittal
Republic Act No. 10590) to the posts.
Section 20. Preparation and Posting of 21.3. The Commission shall transmit, as
Certified List of Overseas Voters. - The far as practicable, but not later than forty-
Commission shall prepare the Certified five (45) days before the day of elections,
List of Overseas Voters or CLOV not later by special pouch to all posts the exact
than ninety (90) days before the start of number of ballots for overseas voters
the overseas voting period, and furnish corresponding to the number of approved
within the same period electronic and applications, along with such accountable
hard copies thereof to the appropriate forms necessary to ensure the secrecy and
posts, which shall post the same in their integrity of the election.
elections. Such report shall contain data their transmittal to the Special Boards of
on the number of ballots cast and received Election Inspectors.
by the offices, the number of invalid and
unclaimed ballots and other pertinent 24.10. During this phase of the election
data. process, the authorized representatives of
the political parties, candidates, and
24.6. Ballots not claimed by the overseas accredited citizens' arms of the
voters at the posts, in case of personal Commission shall be notified in writing
voting, and ballots returned to the posts thereof and shall have the right to witness
concerned, in the case of voting by mail, the proceedings.
shall be cancelled and shipped to the
Commission by the least costly method 24.11. The Commission shall study the
within six (6) months from the day of use of electronic mail, Internet, or other
elections. secured networks in the casting of votes,
and submit a report thereon to the Joint
24.7. Only ballots cast, and mailed ballots Congressional Oversight Committee. (As
received by the posts concerned in amended by Section 24 of Republic Act No.
accordance with Section 25 hereof before 10590)
the close of voting on the day of elections
shall be counted in accordance with Section 25. Voting by Mail. -
Section 27 hereof. All envelopes
containing the ballots received by the 25.1. For the May, 2004 elections, the
posts after the prescribed period shall not Commission shall authorize voting by
be opened, and shall be cancelled and mail in not more than three (3) countries,
shipped to the Commission by the least subject to the approval of the
costly method within six (6) months from Congressional Oversight Committee.
the day of elections. Voting by mail may be allowed in
countries that satisfy the following
24.8. A special ballot Reception and conditions:
Custody Group composed of three (3)
members shall be constituted by the (a) Where the mailing system is fairly
Commission from among the staff of the well-developed and secure to prevent the
posts concerned, including their attached occasion of fraud;
agencies, and citizens of the Philippines
abroad, who will be deputized to receive (b) Where there exists a technically
ballots and take custody of the same established identification system that
preparatory to their transmittal to the would preclude multiple or proxy voting;
SBEI. and,
24.9. A Special Ballot Reception and (c) Where the system of reception and
Custody Group composed of three (3) custody of mailed ballots in the
members shall be constituted by the embassies, consulates and other foreign
Commission from among the staff of the service establishments concerned are
embassies, consulates and other foreign adequate and well-secured.
service establishments concerned,
including their attached agencies, and Thereafter, voting by mail in any country
citizens of the Philippines abroad, who shall be allowed only upon review and
will be deputized to receive ballots and approval of the Joint Congressional
take custody of the same preparatory to Oversight Committee.
27.4. The SBOC composed of the highest and circumstances peculiar to such
ranking officer of the post as Chairperson, country or countries, and which events,
a senior career officer from any of the factors and circumstances are beyond the
government agencies maintaining a post control or influence of the Commission.
abroad and, in the absence of another
government officer, a citizen of the 27.6. In the preparation of the final tally
Philippines qualified to vote under this of votes on the results of the national
Act and deputized by the Commission, as elections, the Commission shall ensure
vice chairperson and member-secretary, that the votes canvassed by each and
respectively, shall be constituted to every country shall be reflected as a
canvass the election returns submitted to separate item from the tally of national
it by the SBEIs. Immediately upon the votes. For purposes of this Act, the
completion of the canvass, the chairperson returns of every election for President and
of the SBOC shall transmit via facsimile, Vice-President prepared by the SBOCs
electronic mail, or any other means of shall be deemed a certificate of canvass of
transmission equally safe and reliable the a city or a province.
Certificates of Canvass and the
Statements of Votes to the Commission, 27.7. Where feasible, the counting and
and shall cause to preserve the same canvassing of votes shall be automated.
immediately after the conclusion of the Towards this end, the Commission is
canvass, and make it available upon hereby authorized to borrow, rent, lease
instructions of the Commission. The or acquire automated voting machines for
SBOC shall also furnish the accredited purposes of canvassing and counting of
major political parties and accredited votes pursuant to the provisions of this
citizens' arms with copies thereof via Act, and in accordance with the
facsimile, electronic mail and any other Implementing Rules and Regulations
means of transmission equally safe, promulgated by the Commission.
secure and reliable.
- RA 7166 – (Synchronized Elections),
The Certificates of Canvass and the Section 12 – Absentee Voting for AFP,
accompanying Statements of Votes as PNP and government employees assigned
transmitted via facsimile, electronic mail to places where they are not registered
and any other means of transmission voters
equally safe, secure and reliable shall be
the primary basis for the national Section 12. Absentee Voting. - Absentee
canvass. voting as provided for in Executive Order
No. 157 dated March 30, 1987 shall apply
27.5. The canvass of votes shall not cause to the elections for President, Vice-
the delay of the proclamation of a winning President and Senators only and shall be
candidate if the outcome of the election limited to members of the Armed
will not be affected by the results thereof. Forces of the Philippines and the
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Philippine National Police and other
Commission is empowered to order the government officers and employees
proclamation of winning candidates who are duly registered voters and
despite the fact that the scheduled who, on election day, may temporarily
election has not taken place in a be assigned in connection with the
particular country or countries, if the performance of election duties to
holding of elections therein has been place where they are not registered
rendered impossible by events, factors voters.