Scribd
Upload
45 views1 page

Grading Form For Technical Papers

This grading form can be used to evaluate student technical papers using criteria-based points. It focuses on technical elements like the title, abstract, introduction developing background and stating hypotheses, method section describing participants, materials, and procedures, results, references, grammar, format, and assigns up to 60 total points. The form is designed for grading two-part technical projects and provides criteria with a technical research focus.

Uploaded by

Alhassan Adamu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
45 views1 page

Grading Form For Technical Papers

This grading form can be used to evaluate student technical papers using criteria-based points. It focuses on technical elements like the title, abstract, introduction developing background and stating hypotheses, method section describing participants, materials, and procedures, results, references, grammar, format, and assigns up to 60 total points. The form is designed for grading two-part technical projects and provides criteria with a technical research focus.

Uploaded by

Alhassan Adamu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

 

Grading Form for Technical Papers


This tool can be used for students to evaluate other student's papers that follow a technical format, such
as APA. This is a criteria-based form where points are assigned for each criteria.

Grading Form for Technical Papers

This form is similar to the Grading Form, but it has a more technical focus. The author of the two forms
used them in conjunction to grade a two part project. The criteria in this form has a more technical
focus.

_______ Title Page with a good descriptive title. (3 points)

_______ Abstract (summarizes study). (5 points)

_______ Introduction (12 points)


Develops the background. Summarizes the relevant literature. States the specific purpose of
the study. Demonstrates a logical connection between previous research and the study.
Includes formal statements of hypothesis (es).

_______ Method (10 points)


Participants (Tells who they were, gives specifics.) Materials (describes the equipment),
Procedure (explained clearly)

_______ Results (5 points)

_______ References (adequate number of relevant sources) (5 points)

_______ Grammar, spelling, sentence construction (7 points)

_______ Format (followed format of sample paper) (3 points)

_______ Total (60 points)

O'Quin, K. (1996) "Depth by doing: Cooperative research projects in social psychology." In :


Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Undergraduate Teaching of Psychology. (10th Ellenville, NY,
March 20-22, 1996).

group-­‐technical.docx    6/10/13  
 

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy