Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Rhetorical Analysis Essay
ENG 110-047
At the beginning of his essay, Sherman Alexie begins with the struggles of his
upbringing. Instead of focusing on his story to gain sympathy for his struggles, he uses it as a
way to introduce his father and his love for reading. He talks about his father's immense passion
for reading and the lengths that he would go to be able to have books to read. This was where
Alexie would get his love of reading from. Since he loved his father so much he began to love
the same things. He then transitions into his childhood, through the books he read. He begins by
picking up his father's books and being fascinated by his discovery of a paragraph. From there he
began to learn to read and see the world through the lens of a paragraph. Throughout his essay,
Alexie seems to be creating his argument through anecdotes from his own life to inspire future
Anecdotes are the main source of evidence from beginning to end. Alexie starts the essay
off with a snippet about how he got super into reading, where he learned to read through looking
at the pictures of the Superman comics and staring blankly at the paragraphs in his father’s
novels, but swiftly moves past that to get to the main argument of his piece, reading is a
necessary skill to become successful. This is made evident by Alexie’s argument that reading
was a way “ to save my life” (Alexie, p. 2). Alexie compares what he has to go through as a
Native American student with a hunger for knowledge, with the expectations of the “normal”
Indian kids, whose societal expectations for them were to not care about anything having to do
with school. The difference that Alexie drew between him and the expectations of Native
American students was that Alexie had an almost obsessive interest in reading, which helped him
“save his life” and become a successful author. The author continues to compare his experience
as a reader to the expectations that are set for the kids, writing that they were “Indian children
who were expected to be stupid” (Alexie, p. 2) in a school setting. Alexie also says reading
“anything that had words and paragraphs,” and cultivating an interest in literacy, he “[refused to
fail” (Alexie, p. 3). The way that Alexie writes allows him to convince the reader to take his side
With most of Alexie’s evidence being snippets from his own life, Alexie seems to be
persuading us to continue to read off of his own credibility. As written earlier, Alexie repeatedly
writes “trying to save my life” while talking about his love for reading. The constant use of this
phrase is there to emphasize the importance of reading. Repetition can be found at the end of
page 2, where Alexie starts most sentences with, “I read…” (Alexie, p. 2/3). This use of
anaphora is important because it is another attempt to emphasize his experiences reading, and the
overall importance that he places on the act of reading to succeed. Alexie views reading not only
as a form of leisure but also as a way out of a life devoid of purpose. Alexie’s use of simple
sentences in this same paragraph also appeals to a general audience, without alienating poor
readers.
Alexie ends his essay by talking about his time as an educator, where he would travel to
different reservation attempting to appeal to students who are uninterested in reading, stating that
he is “trying to save our lives” (Alexie, p. 3). Including this does not strengthen his argument of
the importance of reading, but it does suggest his personal interest in reading as not just a hobby
but a way to become successful. Alexie does have a persistent argument throughout the piece, his
only source of evidence is his own life. He does use repetition, anaphora, and simple sentences
which allow the paper to be read by a larger audience. This fits seamlessly with his argument on
the importance of reading. By including all readers with his simple style of writing, he doesn’t
leave out any type of reader. Through his rhetorical choices, I believe that Alexie formed a
comprehensive, credible argument, through his informal style, and his use of evidence from his
own life which were able to convey his main argument well.