100% found this document useful (1 vote)
118 views2 pages

Performance Appraisal - R&F - Generic

John Rey Cabasal's performance was rated in several key job factors such as work output, work orientation and abilities, attendance, and interpersonal skills. Based on the ratings, his overall performance was determined to be below average, scoring a 2.65 out of 5. The supervisor provided general comments to justify the ratings and plans to discuss developmental areas and recommendations with John Rey Cabasal.

Uploaded by

Wenfam Gas Corp
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
118 views2 pages

Performance Appraisal - R&F - Generic

John Rey Cabasal's performance was rated in several key job factors such as work output, work orientation and abilities, attendance, and interpersonal skills. Based on the ratings, his overall performance was determined to be below average, scoring a 2.65 out of 5. The supervisor provided general comments to justify the ratings and plans to discuss developmental areas and recommendations with John Rey Cabasal.

Uploaded by

Wenfam Gas Corp
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM for

Rank & File Employees

NAME: John Rey Cabasal DATE EVALUATED: April 5, 2019


POSITION: CSR DATE HIRED: February 15, 2019
DEPLOYMENT: Caltex Diokno EMPLOYMENT STATUS:

Part I: Read each scale and assign the numerical rating (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) most nearly describes your subordinate’s performance of his/her job.

Numerical Rating : At the end of each job factor scale, write the numerical rating.
Weighted Rating : Multiply the numerical rating by percentage rating.
Overall Rating : Add all the individual weighted ratings. Indicate rating interpretation based on the scale provided at the back of this form.
General Comments : Write your comments on the space provided which justify your ratings.

Part II: Answer each item on the space provided. (Discuss your ratings with your immediate superior).
Part III: Communicate the results of your appraisal to your subordinates and ask him/her to sign this form.
Part IV: Write your recommendations after you have discussed with your subordinate the results. This part is confidential and should not be shared with him/her.

Part I. KEY JOB FACTORS AND RATINGS

KEY JOB FACTORS Ratings


A. WORK OUTPUT (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Numerical Percentage Weighted
1. QUANTITY OF WORK
Amount of volume of Seldom able to Sometimes Generally Usually Always
acceptable work complete required completes completes completes much completes much
accomplished in a given amount of work. required required amount more than the more than the 3 25% 0.75
time. amount of of work. required amount required amount
work. of work. of work.
2. QUALITY OF WORK
Degree by which work Often commits Work Work fairly Work usually Work generally
meets standards, many errors in sometimes thorough and accurate, neat accurate neat 0.75
accuracy/thoroughness/ works; careless inaccurate; complete and thorough. and complete in 3 25%
neatness of work. incomplete all details
B. WORK ORIENTATION, ABILITIES & SKILLS
3. JOB KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS
Extent of the theoretical Exhibits poor job Exhibits Exhibits enough Exhibits Exhibits
knowledge skills and knowledge and limited job job knowledge thorough job excellent job 0.45
practical know-how of skill knowledge and skill knowledge and knowledge and 3 15%
present job. and skill skill skill
4. ATTITUDE
Comment to company as Generally shows Sometimes Attitude Oftentimes Consistently
shown to dedication to negative attitude shows generally meets shows positive shows positive
work & adherence to positive normal attitude attitude, has 2 0.3
company policy & rules. attitude expectation strong sense of 15%
commitment
5. ATTENDANCE & PUNCTUALITY
Regularity and Frequently absent; Sometimes Attendance Attendance Rarely if ever
punctuality in observing oftentimes does absent; generally meets generally absent or tardy;
work hours. not observe work occasionally normal regular, strictly observes
hours fails to expectations observes work work hours. 2 5% 0.1
observe work hours
hours.

6. INTERPERSONAL SKILLS
Getting along and Antagonizes Very limited Fairly good Above average Outstanding
working well with others people, cannot get ability in ability in getting skills in getting skill in getting
along nor work getting along along and along and along &
well with others and working working well working well working well 2 5% 0.1
well with with others with others. with others &
others obtaining their
full cooperation
7. INITIATIVE
Self-starting ability; Lacks initiative; Exercise very Occasionally Often shows Highly
promptness in taking waits to be told little shows some initiative seizes developed
holds of and following what to do. initiative, initiative; does opportunities for initiative, does
thorough a job with a oftentimes regular work work more than what 2 5% 0.1
minimum amount of needs to be without waiting improvement is required
supervision & direction. told what to for direction. without
do. prodding.
8. JUDGEMENT
Ability to grasp work Poor judgment; Shows limited Shows fairly Shows sound Shows very
situation and draw sound tend to ability to sound judgment, judgment in sound judgment
conclusions. misinterpret facts arrive at usually in routine and under most 2 5% 0.1
and arrive at sound routine matters. slightly complex circumstances
wrong conclusions judgment matters.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Overall Rating: 2.65
Rating Interpretation: Below
Average
INTERPRETATION OF OVERALL RATING

5.00 – 4.40 : Outstanding (Approaches the best possible work performance) 3.74 – 3.00 : Average (Meets normal requirements of the position)
4.39 – 3.75 : Above Average (Exceeds normal requirements of the position) 2.99 – 2.10 : Below Average (Fails short of normal requirements of the position)
2.09 – 1.00 : Poor (Inadequate to fulfill present position)

PART II. DEVELOPMENTAL PROFILE

1. What are the employee’s strong points?

2. What are the employee’s significant limitations?

3. What must the employee do to improve his/her performance?

4. What can the company do for the employee’s development? (Include advancement potential)

PART III. EMPLOYEE’S REVIEW

I had the opportunity to review this performance appraisal

_______________________ _______________________
Employee’s Signature Date

PART IV. RECOMMENDATIONS (to be filled up after the employee has signed this form)

Employment Status

_____ Confirm Present Appointment _____ Terminate before Expiration of Probationary Appointment
_____ Issue Regular Appointment _____ Terminate
_____ Extend Employment Contract (for project –based employee) _____ Others: (please state) ____________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________

Suggested Effectivity Date: ________________________

Promotion/Transfer:
_______________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________ Suggested Effectivity Date
_______________________________________________________________________________________

APPRAISED BY :

Name/Signature: Position: Date:

For HRD Use Only

REVIEWED BY :
Human Resources Head: Signature: Date:

Comments of Reviewer:

Accomplished Form Received By: Date: Action Taken: Date:

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy