HomeANA PeriodicalsOJINTable of ContentsVol 19 2014No 2 May 2014Barriers to NP

Practice

Barriers to NP Practice that Impact Healthcare

Redesign
^ m d 
 

Debra Hain, PhD, ARNP, ANP-BC, GNP-BC

Laureen M. Fleck, PhD, FNP-BC, CDE, FAANP

Abstract

As healthcare reform evolves, nurse practitioners (NP) will play key roles in
improving health outcomes of diverse populations. According to the Institute of
Medicine (IOM) 2011 report, The Future of Nursing: Leading Change Advancing
Health, nurses should be change advocates by caring for populations within complex
healthcare systems. The IOM reports asserts, “advanced practice registered nurses
(APRNs) should be able to practice to the fullest extent of their education and
training” (IOM, 2011, s8). However, existing barriers in the healthcare arena limit
APRN practice. This article will discuss some of these barriers and provide
suggestions for possible ways to decrease the barriers.

Citation: Hain, D., Fleck, L., (May 31, 2014) "Barriers to Nurse Practitioner Practice
that Impact Healthcare Redesign" OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Vol.
19, No. 2, Manuscript 2.

DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol19No02Man02

Key words: Nurse Practitioner, Nurse Practitioner Education, Nurse Practitioner

Practice

In the 1970’s NP education moved from a certificate program to programs that

offered bachelors or masters degrees.  In 1965, to meet the demands of

underserved populations, Loretta Ford and Henry Silver began the first certificate
program that provided nurses with the skills to deliver primary care to children in
community settings. In the 1970’s NP education moved from a certificate program to
programs that offered bachelors or masters degrees. In addition, the population
focus was not only pediatric and families, but also began to include
adult/gerontology, women’s health, neonatal, and other specialty roles. These early
nursing pioneers revolutionized advanced practice nursing. Present-day NPs assume
various roles that include caring for ethnically diverse, underserved populations
within an aging society and across many healthcare settings. The rapid growth of
NPs since the initial certificate programs has been astounding and contemporary NPs
have emerged as leaders in healthcare (Sullivan-Marx, McGivern, Fairman, &

Greenberg, 2010).  Despite many positive expansions to the NP role, there

continues to be many barriers requiring attention of national and state leaders in

order to achieve the Triple Aim of healthcare...  The NP role in the 21st century

looks much different than it did in 1965.

Today, NP practice is impacted by four significant policy and regulation initiatives 1)

the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification
and Education (APRN Joint Dialogue Group, 2008);  2) the Doctor of Nursing Practice
movement;  3) the IOM report (2011); and  4) the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (PPACA). Despite many positive expansions to the NP role, there continues
to be many barriers requiring attention of national and state leaders in order to
achieve the Triple Aim of healthcare:  1) better care;  2) better health; and  3) lower
healthcare cost (Berwick, Nolan, & Whittington, 2008). The next part of this paper
will discuss some of the barriers to NP practice.

Barriers

State Practice and Licensure

NP practice is regulated by state licensure...only about one-third of the nation has

adopted full practice authority licensure and practice laws for NPs.  State

licensure regulates NP practice and is a barrier to NPs practicing to the fullest extent
of their education and training. Licensure and practice laws for NPs vary per state,
despite a main goal of full practice authority. What does this mean? Full practice
authority is “the collection of state practices and licensure laws that allow for NPs to
evaluate patients, diagnose, order, and interpret diagnostic tests, initiate and
manage treatments-including prescribing medications-under the exclusive licensure
authority of the state board of nursing” (American Association of Nurse Practitioner
(AANP), 2014, p.1).
The problem is only about one-third of the nation has adopted full practice authority
licensure and practice laws for NPs. The remainder of NPs in the U.S either have: 1)
reduced practice and licensure which means the NP has the ability to engage in at
least one element of the NP practice and is regulated through a collaborative
agreement with an outside health discipline in order to provide patient care; or  2)
restricted practice and licensure which means that NP has the ability to engage in at
least one element of NP practice and requires supervision, delegation, or team-
management by an outside health discipline in order to provide patient care (AANP,
2013).

IOM report  has recognized that overly restrictive scope-of-practice

regulations of NPs in some states as one of the most serious barriers to accessible

care.  Full practice authority is also referred to autonomous practice or

independent practice. Under full practice authority, NPs are required by their
licensing state to meet educational and practice requirements for licensure, maintain
national certification, consult and refer to other healthcare providers per
patient/family needs, and be accountable to the public and state board of nursing for
meeting the standards of care in practice and professional conduct (AANP, 2014).
The IOM report (2011) has recognized that overly restrictive scope-of-practice
regulations of NPs in some states as one of the most serious barriers to accessible
care. NPs with the same educational preparation and national certification may face
a compendium of restrictions when relocating from one state to another, thus
limiting their scope of practice (Safriet, 2011). Variation of scope-of-practice across
states has an indirect impact on patient care because the degree of physician
supervision may affect practice opportunities and payer polices for NPs (Yee,
Boukus, Cross & Samuel, 2013).

Physician Related Issues

Some physician professional organizations, including the American Medical

Association, believe that because physicians have longer and more rigorous training
than NPs, nurse practitioners are incapable of providing quality, safe care at the
same level as physicians (American Medical Association (AMA), 2010; Fairman,
Rowe, Hassmiller, & Shalala, 2011). However, other physicians recognize that the
education and training is not the same as their own, yet continue to value nurse
practitioners. In 2009, the American College of Physicians published a position paper
identifying the important role NPs play in meeting the growing demand for primary
care (American Colleges of Physicians, 2009). This may contribute to the confusion
among many physicians regarding the role of nurse practitioners.

At a time when healthcare reform is rapidly evolving, it is critical that NPs and

physicians collaborate to achieve best practices.  In preparation for this article,

local nurse practitioners were queried about what they see as physician related
barriers. One common thread was lack of physician and other healthcare
professionals’ knowledge of NPs scope-of-practice (Hain, Personal Communication,
February 15, 2014). At a time when healthcare reform is rapidly evolving, it is
critical that NPs and physicians collaborate to achieve best practices. Although,
physicians and NPs possess a similar goal of improving patient outcomes, barriers to
successful collaboration exist. Lack of knowledge of NPs scope-of-practice has been
identified as a barrier to successful collaboration (Clarin, 2007;Phillips, Harper,
Wakefield, Green, & Fryer, 2002). The traditional medical hierarchal model of
practice contributes to ineffective teamwork. This model promotes physician
dominance over the healthcare team. As the shortage of primary care providers
looms in the distance and healthcare providers struggle to care for an aging
population, this type of medical model will no longer suffice. It is critical to establish
collaborative models of care that embrace the gifts of all members of the healthcare
team (IOM, 2011). Accomplishing this may be difficult if some physicians believe
that nurse practitioners lack competence to provide quality care. This belief can be
one of the major obstacles to independent NP practice (Clarin, 2007).

In Florida, nurse practitioners have struggled for years to move from restrictive
practice and licensure to full practice authority but have consistently been met with
opposition from some medical organizations. Recently, a “fact sheet” was sent to
members of the Florida Medical Association opposing the current Independent
Advanced Practice Registered Nurse bill. The reasons cited were: 1) major
differences in educational preparation between NPs and physicians; 2) concerns
regarding NPs ability to safely prescribe controlled substances and narcotics; 3)
shortage of physicians (should support initiatives to increase the number of
physicians in the state); 4) shortage of nurses (NPs will affect the future nursing
workforce); and 5) inability to control healthcare costs (expansion of role may lead
to NP reimbursement same as physicians); and 6) lack of physician oversight
(concerned about the danger of less qualified RNs practicing without supervision
(FMA Fact Sheet, 2014). Heated debates regarding these topics have brought the
scope-of-practice issue to the forefront with some legislators supporting the
expanded role of NPs and others standing strong with physician organizations who
oppose broadening the scope-of-practice for NPs.
A recent study (Donelan, DesRoches, Dittus, & Buerhaus, 2013) suggests that,
despite a shortage of primary care providers, primary care physicians are not likely
to support expansion of the roles and supply of nurse practitioners. The findings
from this study indicate that the majority of physicians in the sample (70% of the
505 physician respondents) agreed that nurse practitioners should practice to the
“fullest extent of their education and training.”  Nonetheless, many physicians didn’t
agree with NPs leading medical homes or receiving equal pay for providing similar
service as them. On the other hand, NPs felt they were capable of leading medical
homes and there should be equity in compensation for services. In addition,
physicians thought they provided better quality care to patients then NPs which was
incongruent with the beliefs of the NPs in this study and similar studies exploring
this concept.

A Cochrane review of substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care settings

indicated that similar to physicians, nurse practitioners provided high quality care
that leads to improved health outcomes (Laurant et. al, 2004). Patient satisfaction
was higher with nurse-led care; however, this didn’t mean that patients preferred
NPs to doctors. In fact, there were mixed results with some patients preferring
nurses and others preferring physicians. The findings of this review should be
viewed carefully because there were several methodological limitations across the
various studies. Regardless if care is delivered by an NP or a physician, the goal
should be to meet the Triple Aim of healthcare. However, payer polices related to NP
practice may present challenges in meeting these goals.

Payer Policies

Restrictive scope-of-practice may lead to stricter payer policies limiting NPs ability

to practice independently.  Many NPs report that payer polices have a

significant impact on their ability to practice to the fullest extent of their licensure
and training (Yee, Boukus, Cross, & Samuel 2011). Payer policies are often linked to
state practice regulations and licensure. Restrictive scope-of-practice may lead to
stricter payer policies limiting NPs ability to practice independently. They are
essentially forced to be in practice as employees of physician practice, hospitals or
other entities (Yee et al., 2013). Commercial health plan payment policies may vary
and often don't recognize NPs as primary care providers. In addition, these payers
may be resistant to credentialing or directly paying NPs for services they provide. In
some practices, NPs have to bill ‘incident-to’ a physician's services which means the
billing for care delivery is under the physician's name. The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) state that billing incident-to require that the physician
establishes the initial plan of care and the nurse practitioner performs follow up care
with the physician on site. Once again this type of practice may limit practice sites to
only those associated with physicians. Even in states where NPs have full practice
authority, some public and private payers impede NPs from practicing independent
of a physician by not paying directly or reimbursing at a lower rate (Yee et al.,
2013).

State insurance mandates are important to NP practice because they affect nurse

practitioners’ ability to independently practice and bill for services.  State

insurance mandates are important to NP practice because they affect nurse

practitioners’ ability to independently practice and bill for services. Health insurance
mandate “is a command from a governing body, such as a state legislature, to the
insurance industry or health plans to include coverage of a particular healthcare
provider, benefit and/or patient population” (Bunce, 2013, p. 3). This mandate
legislation varies from bill to bill and from state to state and can substantially
increase the cost of health insurance. The problem is some states have not set
mandates for specific reimbursement for nurse practitioners as primary care
providers.

For decades nurses have “been ‘revenue invisible,’...  which may

promote the belief that nurses are not ‘revenue generators.’  For decades nurses

have “been ‘revenue invisible,’ meaning that nursing services are not separated from
the institutional room fee or other professional fees on the billing statements,” which
may promote the belief that nurses are not ‘revenue generators.’ This may
contribute to the underrepresentation in or exclusion from the decision-making
processes that determine the metrics upon which costs, value, pricing, and payment
are based” (Safriet, 2011, pg. H-2). Nurse practitioners historically receive lower
wages and reimbursement fees as compared to their physician counterparts. These
lower payments make it difficult for NP’s to financially sustain a primary care
practice (Chapman, Wides, & Spetz, 2010).

Other Barriers

Nurse practitioners hold prescriptive privileges in 50 states with the ability to

prescribe controlled substances in 49, which has allowed NPs to prescribe
medications for patients in need. Despite having prescriptive privileges, barriers may
exist preventing NPs from following their patients when they are admitted to acute
care facilities which ultimately may impact patient outcomes. Continuity of care is an
important aspect of providing the best care for patients. At a time when care
coordination has drawn national attention, obtaining admitting privileges to a
hospital poses a significant obstacle to continuity of care (Brassard & Smolenski,
2011). The reasons for not allowing NPs to have admitting privileges is unclear;
however, recognizing the potential contribution of NPs, some hospital organizations
are hiring nurse practitioners to increase physician productivity, improve continuity
of care, and improve patient safety and quality (Brassard & Smolenski, 2011).

Another barrier to NP practice is job satisfaction and intent to leave. As the demand
for more primary care providers increases, NPs can be expected to have an active
role in meeting primary care needs. The impact of experienced NPs leaving their job
can have a negative effect on meeting the goals of the Triple Aim. The authors of a
recent study (De Milt, Fitzpatrick, & McNulty, 2011) reported that NPs (n = 254)
who attended a national nurse practitioner conference were more satisfied with their
job if they had “intrapractice partnership and collegiality” (p.47) and that benefits
didn't play a significant role in job satisfaction. Those with the intention to leave
their current position had lower job satisfaction scores as compared to who didn't
have plans to seek new employment. The most common reasons for planning to
leave current positions were having little control over practice and limited career
advancement opportunities. Even though there are study limitations, this research
provides further evidence of the importance of NP independent, collaborative
practice.

Addressing Barriers

Policy Initiatives

The continued dialogue about whether nurse practitioners are prepared to provide
quality, cost effective healthcare reduces the ability to have meaningful
conversations about strategies to address the growing need for primary care
providers and decrease healthcare disparities. State legislative reforms continue to
focus on NPs issues such as state scope-of-practice and payer polices. National
nursing organization such as the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the
American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) are leading advocates for
allowing NPs to practice to the fullest extent of their education and training. In
addition there are many state and local NP organizations that continue to struggle to
move legislative initiatives forward.

The level of physician supervision appears to have the greatest impact on NPs ability
to practice the fullest extent of their education and training (Devi, 2011). Despite
physician organizations opposition, certain consumer groups like AARP (2013) have
shown support for the independent NP practice. The ‘call to action” is loud and clear;
nursing organizations are not able to move policy and legislative initiatives forward
without the financial support of its members. Becoming an active member of nursing
organizations at the national, state, and local levels is a major way to address the
barriers to NP practice.

Eliminating variances in state licensure and scope-of-practice and removing barriers

to independent practice are necessary elements of providing superior primary care.
TheConsensus Model for APRN Regulation (APRN Joint Dialogue Group Report, 2008)
recommends having a single-advanced practice RN license, allowing independent
practice with no regulatory mandates for physician supervision or collaborative
agreement (a formal agreement that is submitted to state boards of nursing).
Standardizing APRN regulation may promote nationwide consistency and quality of
NP educational programs so that there is uniformity among the graduates (Round,
Zych, & Mallary, 2012). NPs have demonstrated the ability to provide quality, cost
effective care, therefore are deserving of equitable pay for services rendered. In
alignment with the concept of quality care, NPs should be held accountable for
contributions to “high-value primary care” by including performance measures of
NPs who are independently practicing or in a collaborative practice in the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality Health Care Quality Report Card (Naylor &
Kurtzman, 2010, p. 897).

Transforming Healthcare

An essential step to advancing the role of NPs is to rethink how to deliver quality,
efficient primary care in an environment with a projected workforce shortage.
Newhouse et al. (2012) suggest having an integrated workforce in which NPs
establish relationships with primary care and specialty physicians. Primary care
providers could refer to NPs with the expertise in chronic disease management. In
accordance with the IOM (2011) report, NPs should take an active role as a member
and/or leader of interprofessional teams. In this dynamic healthcare environment,
NPs should take an outcome driven approach to care, by showing that innovative NP
models of care may lead to improved health outcomes of populations.

Collaboration between physicians and NPs is a fundamental part of healthcare

transformation.  Paying attention to gaps in quality may provide a focused

direction for areas needing improvement. The implementation of the Doctor of

Nursing Practice (DNP) degree has allowed opportunity for nursing inquiry and
quality improvement. These areas include but are not limited to: 1) practice
management, 2) health policy, 3) use of informatics, 3) risk management, 4)
evaluation of evidence, 5) advanced diagnosis and management of disease process
(Apold, 2008). It is anticipated that DNPs will make substantial contributions to
healthcare redesign. Healthcare redesign must include payer policy reform.
Restructuring should support interprofesional teams and promote independent NP
practice (Newhouse et al., 2012). Collaboration between physicians and NPs is a
fundamental part of healthcare transformation.

Collaboration between physicians and NPs as members of interprofesional teams is

an important aspect of achieving the Triple Aim of healthcare. As NPs strive for
independent practice, collaboration can be used as a tool to educate physicians
about the role of NPs and help strengthen relationships to achieve best practice
(Maylone, Ranieri, Griffin, McNulty, & Fitzpatrick, 2009). Collegiality, respect, and
patient-centered care are principle attributes of physician-NP collaboration (Crecelius
et al., 2011). Taking an intellectual approach instead of allowing one’s emotions to
take control when confronted by conflicts with physicians is congruent with the
concepts of interprofesional collaboration (Gegaris, 2007). One way to increase
knowledge and understanding of NP roles is through interprofessional education.

Advanced Practice Education

Future of Advance Practice Nursing Education

In 2008, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJ) and the IOM (2011) began a 2
year initiative to respond to the need to assess and transform the nursing profession
to meet the needs of the very drastically changing healthcare environment (IOM,
2011). The IOM report reveals and recommends an urgent need for highly educated
advanced practice nurses. Guided by the Consensus Model for APRN
Regulation (Joint Dialogue Group Report, 2008), the Master’s and DNP Essentials of
Advanced Practice Nursing (American Association of Colleges of Nursing
(2011; 2006) and National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculty (NONPF),
nurse practitioner educational programs are required to provide the necessary skills
(competencies) for NPs to meet future population healthcare needs.

Since the initial release of core competencies in 1990, NONPF has published updated
and revised core competencies to guide NP educational programs. In response to a
need for further guidance for NP programs, NONPF and the American Association of
Colleges of Nursing collaborated to facilitate the development of population-specific
competencies; the first competencies were completed in 2002 (NONPF, 2013). In
2008, The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation stipulated that APRN must
complete a minimum of three core competencies which are: 1) advanced
physiology/pathophysiology; 2) advanced health assessment; and 3) advanced
pharmacology. The Consensus Model for APRN Regulationmade changes to the
population foci for NP educational tracks, most notably the adult and gerontology
foci were merged and are either primary care or acute; pediatric foci as both
primary or acute care, and psychiatric-mental health across the lifespan (APRN Joint
Dialogue Group Report, 2008) . A task force of representatives from various
organizations convened to develop competencies related to these changes. In
addition, NONPF endorsed the “transition of NP education to the doctoral level and
an integration of previous Master’s level core competencies with the practice
doctorate NP competencies” (NONPF, 2013, p. 7). Leadership, health policy roles,
business, economics, evidence-based practice, interprofessional team approach to
patient-centered care are among the other required NP skills (Aleshire & Wheeler,
2012). Many schools and colleges of nursing, in the midst of faculty shortages, are
struggling to address the demands of a dynamic U.S. healthcare system by assuring
that nurses are prepared to be essential members of the healthcare team.

The IOM and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act have identified the need

to increase primary care providers in the redesign of the healthcare system.  The

IOM (2011) and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act have identified the need
to increase primary care providers in the redesign of the healthcare system. Through
formal education and training NPs are uniquely positioned to fulfill primary care
needs. Many educators are working to create new models to prepare NPs for
practice. NONPF (2013) is committed to enhancing the level of NP and DNP
competency–based education. Competency-based model of care is a way to
demonstrate that NPs are skilled to meet contemporary healthcare challenges
(Sroczynski & Dunphy, 2012). To achieve the best outcomes it is critical that all
professionals have knowledge and competence to engage in collaborative, non-
hierarchal team approach (Golden & Miller, 2013).

Interprofessional Education

Interprofessional education (IPE) is defined as “an intervention where the members

of more than one health or social care profession, or both, learn interactively
together, for the explicit purpose of improving interprofessional collaboration or the
health/well-being of patients/clients, or both” (Reeves, Perrier, Goldman, Freeth, &
Zwarenstein, 2013, p. 2). A systematic review indicated that IPE interventions
compared to no education had positive outcomes such as improved patient
satisfaction, health outcomes of people with specific chronic diseases, and reduction
in medical errors. These promising findings should be carefully considered because
many of the studies were small and lack generalizability. There is a need for more
research exploring the benefits of IPE on clinical outcomes and the effect on
collaboration between NPs and physicians.

Through IPE nurse practitioner students can help others recognize the importance of
Care vs. Cure. This metaphor has been used by Barbara Safriet, J.D. who has
represented NPs in legislative testimony regarding the many regulatory obstacles
and restrictions that impede the full realization of NPs practicing to the fullest extent
of education and training (2013). The paradigm shift from focusing on treating
disease to one of health promotion is not new to nurses. NP students are uniquely
positioned to demonstrate this to other members of the educational team.
Conclusion

Expanded healthcare coverage mandated by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will
impact healthcare providers, policymakers, and payers as the demand for services
escalates. Healthcare professionals will be challenged to meet needs of an aging and
diverse population within an emerging primary care workforce shortage. Through
education and training, NPs are prepared to serve in roles of primary care providers
with the potential to make a substantial impact to improve clinical outcomes. The
role of nurse practitioners is defined by their scope-of-practice and ultimately their
employment agreement which is often disregarding the extent of their education and
training. These along with other barriers discussed in this paper limit the
contribution NPs can to achieve the Triple Aim of healthcare: 1) better care; 2)
better health; and 3) lower healthcare cost. Addressing the barriers to practice
demands attention from NPs, nursing professional organizations, educators,
policymakers, and payers.

Authors

Debra Hain, PhD, ARNP, ANP-BC, GNP-BC 

Email: dhain@fau.edu

Dr. Hain is a board certified adult/gerontological nurse practice with 29 years of

nursing experience, working in various areas of nursing, mostly in nephrology. She
is an Assistant Professor at Florida Atlantic University (FAU), Christine E Lynn
College of Nursing in Boca Raton, FL, and works part-time as a nurse practitioner at
Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Nephrology and at Louis and Anne Green
Memory and Wellness Center a nurse-managed center at FAU. Her scholarship
focuses on improving health outcomes of older adults with chronic kidney disease
and/or cognitive impairment.

Laureen M. Fleck, PhD, FNP-BC, CDE, FAANP 

Email: LaureenFleck@yahoo.com

Dr. Laureen Fleck is a Family Nurse Practitioner from Boca Raton, Florida. She is the
owner of a family practice serving over 7,000 patients including children, adults and
geriatric patients. She serves as a clinical preceptor for nurse practitioner students
and is associate graduate faculty in both the Nurse Practitioner program and
DNP/PhD programs at Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton, FL. Her areas of
special interest include obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and diabetes.

References
Aleshire, M. E. & Wheeler, K. (2012). The future of nurse practitioner practice: A
world of opportunity. Nursing Clinics of North America, 47(2), 181-191.
doi:10.1016/j.cnur.2012.04.002

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). Essentials of doctoral education

for advanced practice nursing. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved
fromwww.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/DNPEssentials.pdf

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). The essentials of master’s

education for advanced practice nursing. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved
fromwww.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/MasEssentials96.pdf

American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (AANP) (2013) Nurse Practitioner State

Practice Environment, retrieved from www.APRN.org

American Colleges of Physicians. (2009). Nurse practitioners in primary care: A

policy monograph of the American Colleges of Physicians. Retrieved
fromwww.acponline.org/advocacy/current_policy_papers/assets/np_pc.pdf

American Medical Association. (AMA) (2010). AMA responds to IOM report on the

future of nursing.  Retrieved from www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/news/news/nursing-
future-workforce.page

APRN Joint Dialogue Group Report (2008). Consensus model for PRN regulation:
Licensure, accreditation, certification, & education. Retrieved
fromwww.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/APRNReport.pdf

AANP (2014) Issues at-a-glance: Full practice authority. Austin, TX: Author.

Retrieved from www.aanp.org/images/documents/policy-
toolbox/fullpracticeauthority.pdf

AARP (2013). Eye on nursing. Retrieved from www.aarp.org/politics-

society/advocacy/info-05-2010/eye_on_nursing.html

Apold, S. (2008). The Doctor of Nursing Practice: Looking back, moving

forward. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 4(2), 101-107.

Baker, P. G. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and

collaborative practice. World Health Organization Retrieved
fromwww.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/en/

Berwick, D., Nolan, T., Whittington, J. (2008). Quality and accountability: The tripple
aim: Care, health & cost. Health Affairs, 27(3). 759-769.
Brassard, A., & Smolenski, M. (2011) Removing barriers to advanced practice
registered nurse care: Hospital Privileges. Insight on the Issues, 55, 1-12. Retrieved
fromhttp://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/ppi/health-care/insight55.pdf.

Bunce, V.C. (2013). Health insurance mandates in the States 2012. Alexandria, VA:

The Council for Affordable Health Insurance.

Clarin, O. A. (2007). Strategies to overcome barriers to effective nurse practitioner

and physician collaboration. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 3(8), 538-548.

Chapman, S. A., Wides, C. D., & Spetz, J. (2010). Payment regulations for advanced
practice nurses: Implications for primary care. Policy, Politics, & Nursing
Practice, 11(2), 89-98. doi:10.1177/1527154410382458

Crecelius, C., Wilson, K., Bakerjian, D., Bonner, A., Caprio, T., Fleshner, I., ... &
Unrein, C. (2011). Collaborative and supervisory relationships between attending
physicians and advanced practice nurses in long-term care facilities. Geriatric
Nursing, 32(1), 7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2010.10.010

De Milt, D. G., Fitzpatrick, J. J., & McNulty, S. R. (2011). Nurse practitioners’ job
satisfaction and intent to leave current positions, the nursing profession, and the
nurse practitioner role as a direct care provider. Journal of the American Academy of
Nurse Practitioners, 23(1), 42-50. doi: 10.111/j.1745-7599.2010.00570.x.

Devi, S. (2011). US nurse practitioners push for more responsibilities. The

Lancet,377(9766), 625-626. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60214-6.

Donelan, K., DesRoches, C. M., Dittus, R. S., & Buerhaus, P. (2013). Perspectives of
physicians and nurse practitioners on primary care practice. New England Journal of
Medicine, 368(20), 1898-1906. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1212938

Fairman, J. A., Rowe, J. W., Hassmiller, S., & Shalala, D. E. (2011). Broadening the
scope of nursing practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(3), 193-196. doi:
10.1056/NEJMp1012121

FMA Fact Sheet (2014) Retrieved

fromwww.pinellascma.org/system/medias/367/original/ARAPRN_Ind_Practice_ver_2
_FINAL.pdf?1392315360.

Gegaris, C. M. (2007) Developing collaborative nurse/physician relationships. Nurse

Leader, 5(5), 43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.mnl.2007.07.006

Golden, A., & Miller, K. P. (2013). Championing truly collaborative team-based

care.Annals of internal medicine, 159(9), 642-643. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-1589-
9-201311050-00714
Iglehart, J. K. (2013). Expanding the role of advanced nurse practitioners—Risks and
rewards. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(20), 1935-1941. doi:
10.1056/NEJMhpr1301084

Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2011). The future of nursing: Leading the change,

advancing health. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press

Laurant, M., Reeves, D., Hermens, R., Braspenning, J., Grol, R., & Sibbald, B.
(2004). Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane database of
systematic reviews, 4.

Maylone, M. M., Ranieri, L., Griffin, M. T. Q., McNulty, R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2011).
Collaboration and autonomy: Perceptions among nurse practitioners. Journal of the
American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 23(1), 51-57. doi: 10.111/j.1745-
7599.2010.00567.x.

Phillips, R. L., Harper, D. C., Wakefield, M., Green, L. A., & Fryer, G. E. (2002). Can
nurse practitioners and physicians beat parochialism into plowshares? Health
Affairs,21(5), 133-142.

Naylor, M. D. & Kurtzman, E. T. (2010). The role of nurse practitioners in

reinventing primary care. Health Affairs, 29(5), 893-899. doi:
10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0440.

Newhouse, R. P., Weiner, J. P., Stanik-Hutt, J., White, K. M., Johantgen, M.,
Steinwachs, D., … & Bass, E. B. (2012). Policy implications for optimizing advanced
practice registered nurse use nationally. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 13(2),
81-89. doi: 10.1177/1527154412456299.

NONPF (2013) DNP NP toolkit: Process and approach to DNP competency based

evaluation. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved
fromhttp://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.nonpf.org/resource/resmgr/imported/DNPNPToo
lkitFinal2013.pdf

Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013).
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare
outcomes (update). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3. doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3

Rounds, L. R., Zych, J. J., & Mallary, L. L. (2012). The consensus model for
regulation of APRNs: Implications for nurse practitioners. Journal of the American
Academy of Nurse Practitioners. doi: 10.111/j.1745-7599.2013.00812.x.

, B. J. (2011). Federal options for maximizing the value of advanced practice nurses
in providing quality, cost-effective health care. In The future of nursing: Leading
change, advancing health (pp. 443-476). Washington, DC: The National Academies
Press

Sroczymski, M. & Dunphy, L.M. (2012) Primary care nurse practitioner clinical
education: Challenges and opportunities. Nursing Clinics North America, 47(4), 463-
479. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2012.08.001.

Sullivan-Marx, E., McGivern, D. Fairman, J. & Greenberg, S. (Eds.). (2010). Nurse

practitioners: The evolution and future of advanced practice (5th ed.). New York, NY:
Springer Publishing Company.

Yee, T., Boukus, E., Cross, D., & Samuel, D. (2013). Primary care workforce
shortages: nurse practitioner scope-of-practice laws and payment policies. National
Institute for Health Care Reform. Research Brief, (13).

© 2014 OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 

Article published May 31, 2014