This document discusses legal ethics in the Philippines. It begins by defining key terms related to legal ethics such as the distinction between the bar and bench. It then discusses the original and present bases of legal ethics in the country. This includes sources like the Constitution, codes of professional responsibility, and court decisions. The document also outlines the requirements to practice law such as admission to the bar, academic qualifications, and continuing obligations as a lawyer. It concludes by describing circumstances where non-lawyers can appear in court, such as small claims cases or representing parties pro se.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views
Significance of Legal Ethics
This document discusses legal ethics in the Philippines. It begins by defining key terms related to legal ethics such as the distinction between the bar and bench. It then discusses the original and present bases of legal ethics in the country. This includes sources like the Constitution, codes of professional responsibility, and court decisions. The document also outlines the requirements to practice law such as admission to the bar, academic qualifications, and continuing obligations as a lawyer. It concludes by describing circumstances where non-lawyers can appear in court, such as small claims cases or representing parties pro se.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Legal Ethics class of persons who are licensed officers
of the courts, empowered to appear,
A branch of moral science, which prosecute and defend; and upon whom treats of the duties which an Attorney peculiar duties, responsibilities, and owes to the court, to the client, and to his liabilities are developed the law as a colleagues and to the public as embodied consequence (Cui v. Cui, 120 Phil. 729). in the Constitution, Rules of Court, the Attorney in fact – an agent whose Code of Professional Responsibility, Canons authority is strictly limited by the of Professional Ethics, jurisprudence, instrument appointing him, however, he moral laws and special laws (Agpalo). may do things not mentioned in his Significance of Legal Ethics appointment but are necessary to the performance of the duties specifically Legal Ethics will guard against the required of him by the power of attorney abuses and ills of the profession such as appointing him, such authority being dishonesty, deceit, immorality, necessarily implied. He is not necessarily a negligence, slothness, lack of diligence lawyer. and the many forms of malpractice of the members of the bar. Counsel de Oficio – a counsel, appointed or assigned by the court, from among Original Bases of Legal Ethics members of the Bar in good standing who, 1. Canons of Professional Ethics by reason of their experience and ability, 2. Supreme Court Decisions may adequately defend the accused. 3. Constitution Attorney ad hoc – a person named and 4. Treatises and publications appointed by the court to defend an 5. Statistics absentee defendant in the suit in which Present basis of the Philippine Legal the appointment is made (Bienvenu v. System: Code of Professional Ethics Factors of Traders Insurance).
Definition of terms Attorney of Record – one who has filed a
notice of appearance and who hence is Bar vs. Bench – refers to the whole body of formally mentioned in “court records as attorneys and denotes the whole body of the official attorney of the party. Person judges, counselors, collectively the whom the client has named as his agent members of the legal profession upon whom service of papers may be made Practice of Law – Any activity in or out of (Reynolds v. Reynolds). court which requires the application of Lead Counsel – the counsel on their side of law, legal principle, practice or procedure a litigated action who is charged with the and calls for legal knowledge, training and principal management and direction of a experience (Cayetano vs. Monsod, 201 party’s case. SCRA 210). House Counsel – lawyer who acts as Attorney-at-law/Counsel-at- attorney for business though carried as an law/Attorney/Counsel Abogado/Boceros – employee of that business and not as an 1. He must have been admitted to the independent lawyer. bar a. Furnishing satisfactory proof Bar Association – an association of of educational, moral and members of the legal profession other qualification; Admission to the Practice of Law b. Passing the bar c. Taking the lawyer’s oath Article 8, Sec 5(5) of the before the SC Constitution vests this power of control d. Signing the Attorney’s roll and regulation in the Supreme Court. The and receiving from the Clerk constitutional power to admit candidates of Court of the SC a to the legal profession is a judicial certificate of the license to function and involves the exercise of practice discretion (In re: Almacen 31 SCRA 562). 2. After his admission to the Bar, a The Bar Examination Committee lawyer must remain in good and regular standing, which is a 1. (1) Member of the Supreme Court continuing requirement for the who acts as chairman and (8) practice of law members of bar a. Remain a member of the IBP 2. The (8) members act as examiners b. Regularly pay all IBP for (8) bar subjects with one subject membership dues and other assigned to each (In re: Lanuevo, 66 lawful assessments, as well as SCRA 254). the annual privilege tax c. Faithfully observe the rules and ethics of the legal Practice of Law profession Any activity in or out of court which d. Be continually subject to requires the application of law, legal judicial disciplinary control principle, practice or procedure and calls Requirements of admission to the Bar for legal knowledge, training and experience (Cayetano vs. Monsod, 201 1. Citizen of the Philippines SCRA 210). 2. At least 21 years’ old 3. Of good moral character It is a privilege granted only to 4. Resident of the Philippines those who possess the strict intellectual 5. Production before the Supreme and moral qualifications required of Court satisfactory evidence of: lawyers who are instruments in the a. Good moral character effective and efficient administration of b. No charges filed against him, justice (In re: Argosino, 1997). involving moral turpitude Requirements before a candidate can Academic Requirements for Candidates engage in the practice of law 1. A bachelor’s degree in arts and sciences (pre-law course) 2. A complete course in: 4. Student Practice Rule – a law a. Civil law student who has successfully b. Commercial law rd completed his 3 year of the regular c. Remedial law 4-year prescribed law curriculum d. Public international law and is enrolled in a recognized law e. Private international law school’s clinical legal education f. Political law program approved by the SC – may g. Labor and social legislation appear without compensation in any h. Medial jurisprudence civil, criminal or administrative case i. Taxation before any trial court, tribunal, j. Legal ethics board or officer, to represent indigents clients accepted by the Appearance of Non-lawyer in Court Legal Clinic of the School (Sec. 1, May a non-lawyer appear in court? Rule 138-A). The student shall be under the direct supervision and General Rule: Only those who are licensed control of a member of the IBP duly to practice law can appear and handle accredited by the law school (Sec. cases in court 2). Exceptions: 5. Under the Labor Code – non-lawyers may appear before the NLRC or any 1. Before the MTC – a party may Labor Arbiter if they (a) represent conduct his case or litigation in themselves; (b) represent their person with the aid of an agent or organization or members thereof friend appointed by him (Sec. 34, (Art. 222, PD 442). Rule 138) 6. A non-lawyer may represent a 2. Before any court – a party may claimant before the Cadastral Court conduct his litigation personally. (Sec. 9, Act. No. 2259) But he gets someone to aid him and 7. Any person appointed to appear the that someone must be an authorized government of the Philippines in member of the Bar (Sec. 34, Rule accordance with law (Sec. 33, Rule 138). He is bound by the same rules 138) in conducting the trial of his case. He cannot, after judgment, claim Rules on Public Officials Regarding that he was not properly Practice of Law represented. 3. In a criminal case before the MTC – Public officials who cannot practice law in a locality where a duly licensed in the Philippines member of the Bar is not available, 1. Judges and other officials and the judge may appoint a non-lawyer employees of the SC (Rule 148, Sec. who is a resident of the province, of 35, RRC) good repute for probity and ability 2. Officials and employees of the to accused in his defense (Sec. 7, Office of the Solicitor General Rule 116) 3. Government Prosecutors (People v. Villanueva, 14 SORA 109) 4. President, Vice-President, members of the cabinet their deputies and assistants (Art. VI, Sec. 15, 1987 Constitution) 5. Members of the Constitutional Commission (Art. IX-A, Sec 2, 1987 Constitution) 6. Ombudsman and his deputies (Art. IX, Sec 8(2), 1987 Constitution) 7. All governors, city and municipal mayors (R.A. No. 7160, Sec. 90) 8. Those prohibited by special law Public officials with restrictions in the practice of law 1. Senators and Members of the House of Representatives 2. Members of the Sanggunian 3. Retired Justice or Judge 4. Civil service officers or employees without permit from their respective department heads (Noriega vs. Sison, 125 SCRA 293) Remedies Against Unauthorized Practice (DICeD) 1. Petition for Injunction 2. Declaratory Relief 3. Contempt of Court 4. Disqualification and complaints for disbarments 5. Criminal complaint for estafa against a person who falsely represented to be an attorney to the damage of a party