SpecPro Part 2
SpecPro Part 2
A - CONCEPT OF ADOPTION.
B - NATURE OF ADOPTION.
C - PURPOSE OF ADOPTION.
7. Daoang vs. Mun. Judge of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte, GR NO. L- 34568, March 28, 1988;
8. Republic vs. Vergara, GR No. L- 95551, March 20, 1977;
9. Cang vs. CA, GR No. L- 105308, September 25, 1998;
G - EFFECTS OF ADOPTION.
I - DECREE OF ADOPTION.
K - RESCISSION OF ADOPTION.
L - GUARDIANSHIP.
20. Oropesa vs. Oropesa, GR No. L- 184528, April 25, 2012;
21. Francisco vs. CA, GR No. L- 57438, January 3, 1984;
22. Rivero vs. CA, GR No. L- 141273, May 17, 2005;
23. Nery vs. Lorenzo, GR No. 23096, April 27, 1972 ( Notice to minor is jurisdictional )
24. Guerrero vs. Tejan, GR No. L- 4898, March 19, 1909 ( Bond of guardians );
25. Delfin Narion vs. Phil Am Life, GR No. L- 22796, June 26, 1967 ( guardianship bond by parents );
26. Francisco vs. CA ( Supra ); qualifications of guardians;
27. Vancil vs. Belmes, GR No. L- 132223, June 19, 2001 ( guardian to be appointed should be within
the court's jurisdiction ); Guerrero vs. Tejan ( Supra ).
M - TRUSTESS.
28. Araneta vs. Perez, GR Nos. L- 16185-86, May 31, 1962 ( distinction bet. executor and
administrator;
29. Salinas vs. Tuazon, GR No. L- 33626, March 2, 1931 ( acquisition of trust by prescription).
PART II
Note: Rules 92 to 97 of the Rules of Court are deemed modified by AM No. 03-02-05-SC ( insofar as
guardianship of minors are concerned ). That means, if the person to be placed under guardianship is
minor, use AM No. 03-02-05-Sc and NOT Rules 92 to 97.
2. STUDY AM No. 02-6-02-SC ( Rule on Adoption ); Rules 99 and 100 of the Rules of Court are repealed.