0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views1 page

Bautista vs. Salonga - Case Digest

The Supreme Court ruled that the Commission on Appointments does not have the constitutional authority to review the President's appointment of the Chairperson of the Commission on Human Rights. Former President Aquino appointed Mary Concepcion Bautista to the position, but the Commission on Appointments claimed authority to confirm the appointment. However, because the Chairperson of the Commission on Human Rights is not one of the positions listed in the Constitution as requiring Commission on Appointments confirmation, the President's appointment of Bautista did not require their review or participation.

Uploaded by

Onilyn Molino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views1 page

Bautista vs. Salonga - Case Digest

The Supreme Court ruled that the Commission on Appointments does not have the constitutional authority to review the President's appointment of the Chairperson of the Commission on Human Rights. Former President Aquino appointed Mary Concepcion Bautista to the position, but the Commission on Appointments claimed authority to confirm the appointment. However, because the Chairperson of the Commission on Human Rights is not one of the positions listed in the Constitution as requiring Commission on Appointments confirmation, the President's appointment of Bautista did not require their review or participation.

Uploaded by

Onilyn Molino
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

G.R. No.

86439 April 13, 1989

MARY CONCEPCION BAUTISTA, petitioner,


vs.
SENATOR JOVITO R. SALONGA, COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE,
JUDICIAL AND BAR COUNCIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND HESIQUIO R. MALLILLIN, respondents.

Facts:
Former President Corazon Aquino appointed Atty. Mary Concepcion Bautista as the acting
Chairman of the Commission on Human Rights. She then decided to make the appointment
permanent and forwarded such to the Commission on Appointments (CA) for confirmation.
Bautista already completed her oath of office before the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and
started to discharge her duties. Thereafter, CA sent a letter to Bautista requiring her to send
information and documents in connection with confirmation of her appointment. Bautista
responded that her position as the chairperson of CHR does not require confirmation by CA,
pursuant to the decision in the case of Sarmient vs. Mison. During the pendency of the issue of
Bautista’s appointment with the CA, former President Aquino appointed Hesiquio Mallilin as the
acting chairman of the CHR. Bautista then received a letter from CA disapproving her appointment
because she refused to be subjected to confirmation by the CA.

Issue:
Whether or not CA has constitutional authority to review the President’s appointment of a
chairperson of CHR.

Held:
No. Since the position of Chairman of the Commission on Human Rights is not among the positions
mentioned in the first sentence of Sec. 16, Art. VII of the 1987 Constitution, appointments to which
are to be made with the confirmation of the Commission on Appointments, it follows that the
appointment by the President of the Chairman of the (CHR), is to be made without the review or
participation of the Commission on Appointments. The Chairman and Members of the Commission
on Human Rights are among the officers of government whom the President may be authorized by
law to appoint. Bautista's appointment on 17 December 1988 is an appointment that was for the
President solely to make.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy