An Introduction To The Raychaudhuri Equations: Sayan Kar
An Introduction To The Raychaudhuri Equations: Sayan Kar
(a) (b)
A A >A
1 2 1
Area at O 1 Area at O2
Shear
A A
Area at O 1 Area at O 2
Rotation
Figure 2. The defining fea-
tures of expansion, shear
A A
and rotation of the disc as
mentioned in the second
Area at O Area at O 2
1 example.
c . F lo w in g F lu id s
Area enclosing fluid flow lines
F in a lly, let u s lo o k a t ° ow in g ° u id s. F low in g ° u id s a re
rep resen ted b y th e v elo city v ecto r ¯ eld d e¯ n ed a t ea ch
p o in t in th e ° u id . T h e v elo city ¯ eld is a lw ay s ta n g en -
tia l to th e so -ca lled ° u id ° ow lin es. C o n sid er th e cro ss-
sectio n a l a rea o rth o g o n a l to ° u id ° ow a t so m e va lu e o f
a p a ra m eter (say ¸ ) w ith w h ich p o in ts in th e ° ow lin es
Figure 3. A set of fluid flow
a re la b elled . T a k e a ¯ x ed n u m b er o f ° ow lin es p a ssin g
lines enclosing cross- th ro u g h th is a rea a n d lo o k a t th e sa m e set o f ° ow lin es
sectional areas at two dif- a t a n o th er lo ca tio n (a n o th er va lu e o f ¸ ) in th e ° u id .
ferent values of the param- D o es th e a rea ex p a n d / co n tra ct, d efo rm in sh a p e o r g et
eter λ. Note that the flow tw isted ? If it d o es, th en w e h av e a situ a tio n sim ila r to
has a positive expansion: th e ca se o f d efo rm a b le m ed ia . W e ca n th erefo re ch a r-
the area at λ1 is smaller a cterise th e ° ow in g ° u id b y lo o k in g a t h ow th e cro ss-
than that at λ2.
sectio n a l a rea ch a n g es w ith th e ° ow o f th e ° u id . F igu re
3 p rov id es a n illu stra tio n o f th e ° ow lin es a n d th e cro ss-
sectio n a l a rea s a t tw o d i® eren t va lu es o f ¸ . D i® eren tia l
eq u a tio n s g ov ern in g th e k in em a tic ev o lu tio n o f th e ex -
p a n sio n , sh ea r a n d ro ta tio n ca n th erefo re tell u s m o re
a b o u t th e n a tu re o f ° u id ° ow . In o th er w o rd s, if y o u
k n ow th e in itia l va lu es o f th e ex p a n sio n , sh ea r a n d ro ta -
tio n , y o u ca n d eterm in e th em a t a la ter sta g e b y so lv in g
th ese d i® eren tia l eq u a tio n s.
In a ll th e th ree ex a m p les g iv en a b ov e, w e n o te a co m m o n
fea tu re { n a m ely, th e n a tu re o f ev o lu tio n o f a v ecto r ¯ eld
a lo n g a p a ra m etrised d irectio n . T h e p a ra m eter co u ld b e
sp a tia l (a s in th e ¯ rst ex a m p le) o r it co u ld b e tim e (a s
in th e seco n d o n e) o r a n a rb itra ry p a ra m eter (a s in th e
la st ex a m p le). T h e eq u a tio n s g ov ern in g th e ev o lu tio n o f
The equations
th e q u a n tities su ch a s ex p a n sio n / co n tra ctio n , sh ea rin g
governing the
o r tw istin g o f su ch ° ow lin es (a s in th e ° u id ca se) a re
evolution of the
th e R ay ch a u d h u ri eq u a tio n s (in a so m ew h a t g en era lised
expansion, shear
sen se). W e sh a ll m a k e th ese id ea s m o re p recise b elow .
or rotation along
the flow lines are 2 . D e v e lo p in g th e D e fo rm a b le M e d ia A n a lo g y
the Raychaudhuri
L et u s n ow d ev elo p th e secon d scen a rio g iv en in th e
equations.
w h ere
¢ » i = B ji (t0 )» j (t0 )¢ t + O ((¢ t)2 ); (2 )
a n d th e in d ex j is su m m ed ov er (eg . ¢ » 1 = B 11 » 1 + B 21 » 2 :
a n d , sim ila rly fo r ¢ » 2 ). T h erefo re, w e m ay w rite
d »i
= B ij (t)» j ; (3 )
dt
w h ere B ij (t) is a n a rb itra ry seco n d ra n k ten so r a n d o n ce
a g a in , th e rep ea ted in d ices (j , fo r in sta n ce, in th e a b ov e
1
eq u a tio n s) m ea n s w e h av e to su m o v er th em , eg . dd»t =
B 11 » 1 + B 12 » 2 a n d so o n . If y o u a re n o t fa m ilia r w ith
ten so rs, th in k o f th e B ij a s a 2 £ 2 m a trix w ith elem en ts
3 . F lu id F lo w s The behaviour of
A s m en tio n ed in th e ¯ rst sectio n , th e k in em a tics o f ° u id the expansion
° ow ca n b e u n d ersto o d u sin g a sim ila r fo rm a lism . In along the flow
o rd er to m a k e co n ta ct w ith co sm o lo g y w e n ow b rin g in would tell us
th e rela tiv istic fo rm a lism . T h e th in g s n eed ed to k n ow whether the flow
a b o u t su ch a fo rm a lism a re listed in B ox 1 . lines come
towards each other
C o m p a rin g w ith th e ca se o f d efo rm a b le m ed ia , w e n o -
or move away.
tice th a t th e d efo rm a tio n v ecto r » i is n ow rep la ced b y
th e v elo city v ecto r v i, w h ere i h ere ru n s fro m 0 to 3 .
A lso , w e a ssu m e v i to b e tim e-lik e (see B ox 1 fo r th e
d e¯ n itio n o f tim e-lik e).' W e co n sid er o n ly th o se ° ow
lin es w h ich a re g eo d esic, in th e sen se th a t v i a re ta n -
g en ts to g eo d esics. T h e g ra d ien t o f th e v elo city v ecto r
i
is o f co u rse @@ xv j . W h en w e h av e a cu rv ed sp a ce-tim e (re-
ca ll w h a t E in stein ta u g h t u s in G en era l R ela tiv ity : th e
g rav ita tio n a l ¯ eld is eq u iva len t to a cu rv ed sp a ce-tim e,
see B ox 1 fo r fu rth er d eta ils), th e u su a l p a rtia l d eriv -
a tiv e is rep la ced b y a cova ria n t d eriva tiv e, d en o ted b y
r j . T h u s, in su m m a ry, th e q u a n tity r j v i is a seco n d
ra n k ten so r a n d ca n b e sp lit, a s b efo re in to th e tra ce,
sy m m etric tra celess a n d a n tisy m m etric p a rts. T h ese a re
o n ce a g a in , th e ex p a n sio n , sh ea r a n d ro ta tio n .
S o , th e eq u a tio n s o f ev o lu tio n o f th e ex p a n sio n , sh ea r
a n d ro ta tio n a lo n g th e ° ow lin es ca n ea sily b e o b ta in ed
b y fu rth er d i® eren tia tin g r j v i, u sin g th e fa ct th a t th e
tra jecto ries a re g eo d esic a n d th en ex tra ctin g th e tra ce,
sy m m etric tra celess a n d a n tisy m m etric p a rts o n b o th
sid es (reca ll, th ese a re ex a ctly th e sa m e a s S tep s (i),
(ii) a n d (iii) m en tio n ed ea rlier, fo r d efo rm a b le m ed ia ).
T h is is a b it co m p lica ted to w o rk th ro u g h , so w e m en tio n
w h a t th e en d resu lt is a n d th en d iscu ss th e co n seq u en ces.
W e lo o k a t o n ly th e eq u a tio n fo r th e ex p a n sio n µ , b e-
ca u se th e o th er eq u a tio n s a re m o re co m p lica ted a n d a lso
b eca u se R ay ch a u d h u ri, in h is o rig in a l p a p er, d id ch o o se
to d iscu ss th is eq u a tio n in g rea ter d eta il.
B ox 1.
T ra n sfo r m a tio n s: To go from one inertial frame tx y z to another t0x 0y 0z 0, one has to
use the Lorentz transformations and n o t the Galilean transformations. The Minkowski
distance mentioned above remains unchanged under a Lorentz transformation of the
coordinates.
d2F
+ k (¸ )F = 0: (1 6 )
d¸ 2
H ow ev er, it is a h a rm o n ic o scilla to r ty p e eq u a tio n o n ly
if k is a p o sitiv e q u a n tity. T h is m ea n s R ij v iv j + ¾ 2 ¸ 0 .
O r, w ith ¾ 2 ¸ 0 , w e h av e th e req u irem en t R ij v iv j ¸ 0 .
N ow , o n e m ay a sk { w h a t d o w e g et o u t o f th is h a rm o n ic
o scilla to r-lik e eq u a tio n ? T o u n d ersta n d th is, w e n eed to
g o b a ck to th e d e¯ n itio n o f µ = F3 dd F¸ . If F is o scilla to ry,
th en F w ill h av e zero s a t ¯ n ite va lu es o f ¸ , (rem em b er,
fu n ctio n s lik e th e sin e o r co sin e h av e zero s a t ¯ n ite va lu es
o f ¸ ). T h is w o u ld im p ly th a t µ ca n d iv erg e to n eg a tiv e
in ¯ n ity if, in itia lly (a t say, ¸ = 0 ), µ is n eg a tiv e. N ow
reca ll th a t µ is a q u a n ti¯ er o f th e iso tro p ic ex p a n sio n .
T h erefo re w e m ay w rite µ a s
A (¸ 2 ) ¡ A (¸ 1 )
µ = ; (1 7 )
A (¸ 2 )
R ela tiv ity a s rela ted to `g rav ita tin g m a tter', w h ich is
a ttra ctiv e in n a tu re. L o o sely sp ea k in g , R ij v iv j is so m e-
w h a t lik e r 2 Á (w ith Á a s th e g rav ita tio n a l p o ten tia l).
T h erefo re, u sin g P o isso n 's eq u a tio n fo r N ew to n ia n g rav -
ity, r 2 Á is p ro p o rtio n a l to th e m a ss d en sity ½ m , w h ich
a s w e a ll k n ow , is a lw ay s ¸ 0 .
E x e rc is e 4 . A ssu m in g ! ij = 0 a n d R ij v iv j ¸ 0 , o n e
ca n reca st th e R ay ch a u d h u ri eq u a tio n a s a n in eq u a lity
dµ
d¸
+ 13 µ 2 · 0 . A n a ly se th is in eq u a lity to sh ow th a t if µ
a t ¸ 0 is n eg a tiv e, th en µ m u st ten d to n eg a tiv e in ¯ n ity
w ith in a ¯ n ite va lu e o f ¸ .
Y o u m ig h t b e cu rio u s, a t th is sta g e, a s to w h y w e a re
a lw ay s settin g th e ro ta tio n eq u a l to zero ? If y o u d o n 't,
y o u w ill g et a n o p p o site e® ect, b eca u se th e sig n o f th a t
term in eq u a tio n (1 3 ) is o p p o site to th a t o f th e ¾ 2 a n d
th e R ij v iv j term s. T h u s ro ta tio n ca n a ctu a lly lea d to
a defocu sin g (g eo d esics m ov in g aw ay fro m ea ch o th er)
e® ect.
4 . C o sm o lo g y
A s m en tio n ed rig h t a t th e b eg in n in g , th e eq u a tio n s o rig -
in a lly a ro se in th e co n tex t o f co sm o lo g y. In a m o d el o f
th e u n iv erse w h ich w e ca ll a co sm o lo g ica l m o d el, th e
u n iv erse is ta k en a s h o m o g en eo u s a n d iso tro p ic (i.e., n o
p referred lo ca tio n s o r d irectio n s) a t sca les in w h ich a
g a la x y is trea ted a s a p o in t. S u ch g a la x ies m a k e u p
th e co sm o lo g ica l ° u id w h ich ° ow s a lo n g g eo d esics in th e
g iv en g eo m etry. T h e ex p a n sio n o f th e u n iv erse is q u a n -
ti¯ ed b y a sca le fa cto r w h ich w e d en o te a s a (t). T h e a (t)
ca n b e o b ta in ed b y so lv in g th e E in stein eq u a tio n s w ith
a n a p p ro p ria te so u rce, u su a lly a p erfect ° u id . S o , it ca n
b e seen , h ow ° u id ° ow en ters th e p ictu re. O b v io u sly,
o n ce w e h a v e a ° ow , w e m u st h av e ex p a n sio n , sh ea r a n d
ro ta tio n . It tu rn s o u t th a t th e ex p a n sio n is g iv en q u ite
sim p ly :
a_ 1 d
µ = 3 = 3 a3: (1 8 )
a a dt
B ox 2.
What is a sin gu la rity? Loosely speaking, it is a location where `things' are ill-de¯ned.
Recall Coulomb's law or Newton's law of gravity and ask yourself { what happens when
you are just at the location of the point charge or the point mass { the potential and
the ¯eld diverges to in¯nity. Einstein taught us that gravity is manifest in the curvature
of space-time { so when the curvature becomes very large, gravity must be very strong
too. More speci¯cally, when certain co-ordinate invariant quantities (scalars) diverge at
some point, we say that we have a cu rva tu re sin gu la rity. The Big Bang and the black
hole are two examples, though they are di®erent in nature. For instance, in the case of
Big Bang, the scalars just mentioned about, vary as inverse powers of the scale factor
a (t) { so when a (t) ! 0 (the universe shrunk to a point in its past, as it is believed to
have been) these quantities diverge. However, note there is another characteristic of a
singularity { geodesics (trajectories) seem to end there, they cannot be continued further
beyond and this happens at a ¯nite value of the parameter that labels points on them.
Such situations are described technically by the term geod esic in co m p leten ess. But it
might happen that geodesic incompleteness can occur without there being any curva-
ture singularity, i.e., those scalars may not diverge at that point beyond which geodesics
cannot be continued. So, its a o n e-w a y statement which we can make { curvature sin-
gularities are locations where curvature diverges and geodesics end (focus) but geodesics
can focus in a completely benign way too (without encountering a curvature singular-
ity). In a nutshell, curvature singularities imply geodesics focusing there, but, geodesic
focusing does not necessarily imply a curvature singularity. Thus, you realise how im-
portant the Raychaudhuri equations must be in understanding these singularities, which,
despite Einstein's utter dislike of them, are inevitably there in his theory of gravity. The
details about singularities (their de¯nition, properties, the conditions under which they
are bound to appear etc.,) is what Hawking and Penrose worked on in the 1960s, early
1970s and one of their tools (among many others) were the Raychaudhuri equations.
If w e ta k e a (t) » tº , th en µ » t¡1 . G o in g b a ck w a rd s
in tim e (i.e., tow a rd s t ! 0 fro m to d ay ), it is th erefo re
ea sy to see th a t w e en d u p w ith a n ex p a n sio n w h ich b e-
co m es n eg a tiv e in ¯ n ity. T h a t's focu sin g { a n d w h ere d o
th ese g eo d esics fo cu s to ? { th e b ig b a n g ! S o , in ev ita b ly,
th e ex isten ce o f a sin g u la rity (see B ox 2 to g et a n id ea
o f a sin g u la rity ) b eco m es o b v io u s irresp ectiv e o f w h a t º
is. F u rth er, lo o k in g a t th e seco n d ex p ressio n fo r µ (i.e.,
µ = a13 ddt a 3 ), o n e ca n ea sily co n clu d e th a t µ is a q u a n tity
w h ich ch a ra cterises th e fra ctio n a l ch a n g e in th e v o lu m e
o f th e th ree-d im en sio n a l sp a ce (v o lu m e = a 3 ). T h ere-
fo re, it is a lso ca lled th e volu m e ex p a n sio n . In fa ct th e
R ay ch a u d h u ri eq u a tio n a n d g eo d esic fo cu sin g g av e th e